Ord. 1479 2013-05-13ORDINANCE NO. 1479
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND,
TEXAS, REVISING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF PEARLAND; UPDATING IMPACT FEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
STATE LAW; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING A PENALTY
FOR VIOLATION; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE AND A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION,
CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, by virtue of Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated, Volume 3, Local
Government Code, Chapter 395 ("State Law"), the City Council has found it necessary and
appropriate to revise the City's capital improvements plan and update impact fees to
comply with the provisions of said State Law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has employed qualified professionals to revise the
capital improvements plan and calculate updated impact fees, and has held a public
hearing, as required by State Law, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt the revised capital improvements
plan and levy an updated impact fee in accordance with said State Law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS:
Section 1. The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance are
hereby found to be true and correct.
Section 2. The capital improvements plan, included in a study by Freese and
Nichols entitled Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update 2012 (the "Study"), is
incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all purposes.
Section 3. The updated impact fee calculations, included in the Study made a part
hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved and adopted.
1
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
Section 4. The impact fees set forth in the Study are hereby levied against new
development on lands located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Pearland. The
impact fees levied hereby are subject to the applicable provisions of State Law.
Section 5. Penalty. Any person who shall violate the provisions of this section
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction by a court of
competent jurisdiction, be punished by a fine in any sum not exceeding Five Hundred
Dollars ($500.00).
Section 6. Savings. All rights and remedies which have accrued in favor of the
City under this Chapter and amendments thereto shall be and are preserved for the benefit
of the City.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid, unconstitutional or otherwise
unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 8. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed but only to the extent of such conflict.
Section 9. Codification. It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Pearland,
Texas, that the provisions of this Ordinance shall be codified in the City's official Code of
Ordinances as provided hereinabove.
Section 10. Publication and Effective Date. The City Secretary shall cause this
Ordinance, or its caption and penalty, to be published in the official newspaper of the City
2
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
of Pearland, upon passage of such Ordinance. The Ordinance shall then become effective
ten (10) days after its publication, or the publication of its caption and penalty, in the official
City newspaper.
PASSED and APPROVED ON FIRST READING this the 22nd day of April, A. D.,
2013.
ATTEST:
614,1,
MA IA E. RODRIGU Z
DEP TY CITY SECRETARY
3
TOM REID
MAYOR
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
PASSED and APPROVED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING this the 13th day of
May, A. D., 2013.
ATTEST:
.,4 t-diz. LAT Le
MAIA E. RODRIGUEZ ()
DEUTY CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DARRIN M. COKER
CITY ATTORNEY
4
TOM 1REID
MAYOR
NOTE TO CITY COUNCIL
Study to be attached to original executed ordinance as Exhibit "A".
Copy available in City Secretary's office for review.
Memorandum
To: Mayor Reid and City Council
From: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIRC)
Date: February 22, 2013
RE: 2012 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Report Update
On February 18, 2013 the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee met to review and take
action on the 2012 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Report Update. The Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee recommends approval of the proposed 2012 Water and
Wastewater Impact Fee Report Update.
Sincerely
Henry Fuertes
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
Chairperson
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
1 NICHOLS
Table 2.3 City of Pearland Service Unit Factors
No.
Development Type
Unit of Measure
S.U.E.
Remarks
1
Bakery
Square Foot
0.000700_
2
Barber Shop
Chair
0.470000
3
Beauty Salon
Bowl
0.470000
4
Bowling Alley
Lane
0.635000
Does not include restaurant
5
Car Repair
Square Foot
0.000160
Does not include carwash
6
Carwash, Tunnel Self Service
Lane
6.350000
7
Carwash, Wand Type Self Service
Bay
1.220000
8
Carwash, Tunnel With Attendants
Lane
31.430000
Does not include reclamation
9
Church, Administration
Occupant
0.047000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
10
Church, Auditorium
Seat
0.003200
11
Church, Classroom
Seat
0.004700
12
Club/Tavern/Loun:e
Seat
0.031000
13
Convenience Store
Square Foot
0.000220
14
Country Club
Occupant
0.390000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
15
Day Care Center
Occupant
0.031700
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
16
Doctor Office/Dentist Office/Emergency Clinic
Square Foot
0.000335
17
Dormitory
Bed
0.286000
18
Driving Range
Tee
0.210000
19
Fire Station
Employee
0.286000
20
Funeral Home
Embalming Station
2.140000
21
Gas Station, SelfServiceIsland
0.800000
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not include carwash
22
Gas Station, Full -Service
Island
0.860000
Island is defined as 1 .umpin: station - Does not include carwash
23
Grocery Store
Square Foot
0.000260
Does not include restaurant
24
Health Club
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
25
Health Club w/ Whirpool or Swimming Pool
Occupant
0.032000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
26
Hospital
Bed
0.635000
Patient Care Area - Does not include designated office areas
27
Hotel/Motel
Room
0.251000
Does not include restaurant
28
Hotel/Motel with Kitchenettes
Room
0.430000
29 -
Ice Cream Parlor with Seating
Seat
0.047000
30
Indoor Entertainment/Amusement w/o Restaurant
Occupant
0.031000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
31
Industrial Laundry
50 lbs
0.950000
32
Manufacturing
Square Foot
0.000160
Average: Each development must be individually evaluated
33
Nursing Home
Bed
0.286000
34
Office Building
Square Foot
0.000335
35
Photo Store, 1 -Hour Processing
Store
4.000000
36
Post Office, Excluding Dock
Square Foot
0.000254
37
Raquetball Club
Court
0.510000
38
Recreational Vehicle Park
Space
0.238100
39
Resident, Apartment
Dwelling Unit
0.700000
Basic Service Unit
40
Resident, Condominium
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
41
Resident, Duplex
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
42
Resident, Mobile Home
Dwelling Unit
0.700000
43
Resident, Single Family
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
44
Resident, Town House
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
45
Restaurant, Full -Service, General
Seat
0.110000
46
Restaurant, Fast Food with Seatin:
Seat
0.047000
47
R- .0 . , F.s F... , 1 .0 S-. r
S.uareFoot
0.002300
48
Restaurant, Buffet with Seatin:*
Seat
0.110000
*Non -disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
49
Restaurant, Buffet with Seatin:**
0.070500
**Disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
50
Retail Store
S.uare Foot
0.000223
School, High
Seat
0.047600
Does not include resident dormitory
52
School, Other
Seat
0.031700
Does not include resident dormitory
53
Skatin Rink
Occupant
0.016000
Occu anc Loads established b the ado. ted buildin: codes
54
Swimml g Pool
Occupant
0.016000
Occupant Loads established b the ado.ted buildin: codes
55
Stadium
Seat
0.010000
56
Theatre, Drive-in
Space
0.016000
57
Theatre, Indoor
Seat
0.016000
58
Toilet (non-specific)
Toilet
0.254000
59
Transportation Terminal without Restaurant
Passenger
0.016000
60
Warehouse
Square Foot
0.000100
61
Washateria
Machine
1.580000
2-6
25659207 CITY OF PEARLAND Mar 13 2013 Page 2
Houston Chronicle
CLASSIFIEDS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING ON
AMENDMENT OF
IMPACT FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
THAT A PUBLIC HEARING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PEARLAND,
TEXAS WILL BE HELD ON
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY
OF APRIL 2013, 6:00 PM IN
THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AT CITY HALL, 3519 LIB-
ERTY DRIVE, PEARLAND,
TEXAS, AT WHICH TIME
THE CITY COUNCIL WILL
RECEIVE PUBLIC COM-
MENTS ON THE FOLLOW-
ING ITEM:
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC
HEARING ON AN AMEND-
MENT OF IMPACT FEES,
THE PURPOSE OF WHICH
IS TO CONSIDER THE
AMENDMENT OF LAND
USE ASSUMPTIONS AND A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN AND THE IMPOSI-
TION OF AN IMPACT FEE.
ANY MEMBER OF THE
PUBLIC HAS THE RIGHT TO
APPEAR AT THE HEARING
AND PRESENT EVIDENCE
FOR OR AGAINST THE UP-
DATE.
DATED THIS 12TH DAY OF
MARCH 2013
YOUNG LORFING, TRMC
CITY SECRETARY
THIS SITE IS ACCESSIBLE
TO DISABLED INDIVIDU-
ALS. FOR SPECIAL ASSIS-
TANCE, PLEASE CALL
YOUNG LORFING AT (281)
652-1655, PRIOR TO THE
MEETING SO THAT AP-
PROPRIATE ARRANGE-
MENTS CAN BE MADE.
25659207 CITY OF PEARLAND Mar 13 2013
Page 1
Houston Chronicle
CLASSIFIEDS
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF TEXAS:
COUNTY OF HARRIS:
Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State
of Texas, on this day personally appeared, the Newspaper Representative
at the HOUSTON CHRONICLE, a daily newspaper published in Harris County, Texas,
and generally circulated in the Counties of: HARRIS, TRINITY, WALKER, GRIMES,
POLK, SAN JACINTO, WASHINGTON, MONTGOMERY, LIBERTY, AUSTIN, WALLER, CHAMBERS,
COLORADO, BRAZORIA, FORT BEND, GALVESTON, WHARTON, JACKSON, and MATAGORDA
and that the publication, of which the annexed herein, or attached to,
is a true and correct copy, was published to -wit:
CITY OF PEARLAND 25659207 53870025
RAN A LEGAL NOTICE
SIZE BEING: 1 X 54 L
product date class page
he Mar 13 2013 1245.0 D_wedlg_6
1010.
NEWSPAPER REPRESENTATIVE
Sworn and subscribed to before me, this the 13th Day of March A.D. 2013
``‘��l►11113ec��1.1.11'''
�4E¢QN1C�
�
=
-t1: n:Z
I.I�'7%°'iii, rEXPkS �:
"/"..v.
,20 i 6 �e����°\
X
Notary Public in and for
the State of Texas
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
The Pearland Reporter News
2404 Park Avenue
Pearland, Texas 7,
State of Texas
Brazoria and Harris Counties
Ordinance No. 1479
Exhibit
I, Lloyd Morrow, hereby certify that the notice hereby appended was published in
THE REPORTER NEWS, a newspaper of general circulation in Brazoria, Harris and
Galveston Counties, for % issues, as follows:
No. / Date 4g 20 R
No. Date 20
No. Date 20
No. Date 20
No. Date 20
Subscribe and sworn to before me this SO
20 L.3
LAURA ANN EMMONS
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF TEXAS
My Commission Expires 09-09-2014
CFO
day of C/IXALS,
Laura Ann Emmons, Publisher
Notary Public, State of Texas
bki). /Ifig
LEGALS
Published May 29, 2013
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF
PEARLAND, TEXAS,
REVISING THE CAPI-
TAL IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF PEARLAND; UP-
DATING IMPACT FEES
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STATE LAW;
MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS; PROVID-
ING A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATION; CONTAIN
ING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE, A SEVER-
ABILITY CLAUSE AND
A REPEALER
CLAUSE; PROVIDING
FOR PUBLICATION,
CODIFICATION AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Section 5. Penalty.
Any person who shall
violate the provisions of
this section shall be
deemed guilty of a mis-
demeanor and shall,
upon conviction by a
court of competent juris-
diction, be punished by
a fine in any sum not
exceeding Five Hundred
LEGALS
Dollars ($500.00).
PASSED and AP-
PROVED this the 13th
day of May, A.D., 2013.
/s/ Tom Reid, Mayor
ATTEST:
Young Lorfing, TRMC
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO
FORM:
/s/ Darrin M. Coker
City Attorney
VOTING RECORD
SECOND AND
FINAL READING
MAY 13, 2013
Voting "Aye" — Council -
members Owens, Sher-
man, Sherrouse, Orde-
neaux and Hill.
Voting "No" - None.
Motion passes 5 to 0.
PUBLICATION DATE:
May 29 2013
EFFECTIVE DATE:
June 7, 2013
PUBLISHED AS RE-
QUIRED BY SECTION
3.10 OF THE CHARTER
OF THE CITY OF
PEARLAND, TEXAS
Innovative approaches
Practical results
Outstanding service
/
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
May 2013 Update
Prepared for:
City of Pearland
Prepared by:
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
11200 Broadway Street
Offices West, Suite 2332
Pearland, Texas 77584
(832) 456-4700
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report ri <NICHOLS
City of Pearland
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
May 2013 Update
TF�-9s1
i* ®° ° ° a *I,�
°°0°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°o°°° Pro
RICHARD WEATHERLY
r� 100211 a ��:
,�VSS6Cee,e C'��� 5/2Z//3
Ar1,44 &1-424-Pc
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
TEXAS REGISTERED
ENGINEERING FIRM
F-2144
CITY OF PEARLAND
3519 Liberty Dr.
Pearland, TX 77581
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
11200 Broadway Street
Offices West, Suite 2332
Pearland, Texas 77584
FNI Project Number: PRL12291
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rii INICHOLS
City of Pearland
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 BACKGROUND 1-1
2.0 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS 2-1
2.1 Service Area 2-1
2.2 Historical & Projected Population 2-1
2.3 Land Use 2-3
2.4 Current and Projected Service Units 2-5
2.5 Construction Trends 2-7
3.0 WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 3-1
3.1 Existing System 3-1
3.2 Future Planned System 3-2
3.3 Water System Projections 3-3
3.4 Water Capital Improvements Plan 3-6
4.0 WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 4-1
4.1 Existing System 4-1
4.2 Wastewater System Projections 4-4
4.3 Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan 4-5
5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS 5-1
5.1 Maximum Impact Fee Determination 5-1
5.2 Impact Fee Assessment 5-2
6.0 IMPACT FEE ADOPTION 6-1
6.1 Public Hearing 6-1
6.2 Ordinance 6-1
i
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rii INICHOLS
City of Pearland
Table 1.1
Table 2.1
Table 2.2
Table 2.3
Table 2.4
Table 2.5
Table 3.1
Table 3.2
Table 3.3
Table 3.4
Table 3.5
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 4.4
Table 4.5
Table 5.1
Figure 2.1
Figure 3.1
Figure 4.1
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
LIST OF TABLES
List of Abbreviations
Historical and Future Population Projections(')
Existing and Future Land Use Projections(1)
City of Pearland Service Unit Factors
Service Unit Projection(1)(2)
Construction Permits Granted
Existing Water Supply Facilities
Water Production in Million Gallons (2007 — 2012)
Future Planned Water Supply Facilities
System Capacity and Projected Water Demands
Water Impact Fee Eligible Projects & Utilization
Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Wastewater Flow to each WWTP in Million Gallons (2007 — 2011)
Total Wastewater Flow in Million Gallons (2007 — 2011)
System Capacity and Projected Wastewater Flows
Water Impact Fee Eligible Projects & Utilization
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation
LIST OF FIGURES
1-1
2-2
2-3
2-6
2-7
2-7
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-7
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-6
5-2
Future Land Use 2-4
Water System Impact Fee Capital Improvements 3-8
Water System Impact Fee Capital Improvements 4-7
LIST OF APPENDICES
Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code
City of Pearland 2012 Market Study Update
Water Facilities Capacity Criteria
Water System 10-Year CIP Project Descriptions and Cost Tables
Wastewater System 10-Year CIP Project Descriptions and Cost Tables
Analysis of Water and Wastewater Plants Reserve Capacity
Public Hearing Presentation —April 22, 2013
City Ordinance No. 1479
ii
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report FilNICHOLS
City of Pearland
1.0 BACKGROUND
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires an impact fee analysis before impact
fees can be created and assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as "a charge or
assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate
revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions
necessitated by and attributable to the new development." In September 2001, Senate Bill 243
amended Chapter 395 thus creating the current procedure for implementing impact fees.
In June 2012, the City of Pearland, Texas, authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to update
the 2007 Impact Fee Study for the City's water and wastewater systems. The purpose of this
report is to address the methodology used in the development and calculation of water and
wastewater impact fees for the City of Pearland. Also presented in this report are individual
water and wastewater capital improvements identified by the City of Pearland that will be
required to meet the 10-year demand. A study of existing and future land use assumptions is
described in the report. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas
Local Government Code Chapter 395 for the establishment of water and wastewater impact
fees, as seen in Appendix A.
Table 1.1 provides a list of abbreviations used in this report.
Table 1.1 List of Abbreviations
Abbreviation
Full Nomenclature
AWWA
American Water Works Association
CIP
Capital Improvements Plan
ESFC
Equivalent Single Family Connection
FNI
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
gpcd
Gallons per Capita per Day
gpd
Gallons per Day
gpm
Gallons per Minute
MGD
Million Gallons per Day
TCEQ
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
1-1
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report IiiUNICHOLS
City of Pearland
2.0 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Population and land use are important elements in the analysis of water and wastewater
systems. Water demands and wastewater flows depend on the residential population and
commercial development served by the systems and determines the sizing and location of
system infrastructure. A thorough analysis of historical and projected populations, along with
land use, provides the basis for projecting future water demands and wastewater flows.
2.1 Service Area
The service area for Pearland's water and wastewater systems is defined as the area bounded
by the existing city limits. There are two exceptions to this definition:
• Brazoria County MUD 1 is within the city limits but is outside the City of Pearland impact
fee service area. The estimated population is 4,288.
• Brazoria County MUD 4 was annexed into the city effective December 31, 2012. The
MUD was outside the city limits but inside the City of Pearland impact fee service area in
2012. The estimated population is 3,045.
• Brazoria County MUD 16 is outside the city limits but is inside the City of Pearland
impact fee service area. The estimated population is 878.
Pearland's city limits encompass approximately 47.56 square miles or 30,438 acres.
2.2 Historical & Projected Population
Population growth projections were established based on information from the 2012 Market
Study Update prepared by the City's Planning Department as seen in Appendix B, as well as
information on upcoming developments. The City estimated a 2015 population of 109,400 and
an annual growth rate of approximately 3,100 people every year beyond 2015. For the 2000 -
2005 period, the estimated City population was increased by the MUD 16 population. For the
2006 - 2032 period, the estimated City populations were reduced by the MUD 1 population and
increased by the MUD 16 population. Historical census data as well as future population
projections and the impact fee eligible population are shown in Table 2.1.
2-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
ir
1 NICHOLS
Table 2.1 Historical and Future Population Projections(1)
Year
Total
Population
Average Annual
Population Growth
Average Annual
Population Growth
(%)
Total Impact Fee
Eligible
Population(3)
2000(2)
37,640
-
-
1
38,518
2001
39,612
1,972
5.2%
40,490
2002
42,772
3,160
8.0%
43,650
2003
46,013
3,241
7.6%
46,891
2004
50,553
4,540
9.9%
51,431
2005
58,379
7,826
15.5%
59,257
2006
68,835
10,456
17.9%
65,425
2007
77,425
8,590
12.5%
74,015
2008
83,363
5,938
7.7%
79,953
2009
87,939
4,576
5.5%
84,529
2010(2)
91,252
3,313
3.8%
87,842
2012
103,800
6,274
6.9%
100,390
2017
115,626
3,113
2.8%
112,216
2022
131,165
3,100
2.5%
127,755
2027
146,665
3,100
2.2%
143,255
2032
162,165
3,100
2.0%
158,755
2)
3)
Date of preparation: October 2012
US Census - City of Pearland
Total Impact Fee Eligible Population is the Total Population reduced by MUD 1
and increased by MUD 16. MUD 4 is included in the Total Population for 2012.
2-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
Fil NICHOLS
City of Pearland
2.3 Land Use
The City provided an existing and buildout acreage distribution by land use type. According to
information received from the City, growth is expected to continue in the next 10 years. This
growth is expected to be centered in the Shadow Creek development and other developments
with vacant lot inventory. The City is expected to need approximately 4,668 acres for
developmental purposes during the next 10 years, with approximately 1,373 acres
(approximately 30%) required for commercial/industrial use. Residential uses will require
approximately 3,271 acres (approximately 70%) with the vast majority of this development
allocated for single family usage. Table 2.2 presents the land use acreage by planning year for
the water and wastewater service area broken up by land use type. Figure 2.1 shows the
growth projections throughout the City (including Shadow Creek Ranch).
Table 2.2 Existing and Future Land Use Projections(')
Land Use
2012
2017
2022
2027
Total
Acres
New
Acres
Total
Acres
New
Acres
Total
Acres
New
Acres
Total
Acres
Single Family
9,718
1,692
11,410
s
1,565
12,975
1,565
14,540
Multi -Family
339
18
357
20
377
22
399
Subtotal
10,057
1,710
11,767
1,585
13,352
1,587
14,939
Commercial/Industrial
4,779
827
5,606
546
6,152
546
6,698
Total
14,836
2,537
17,373
2,131
19,504
2,133
21,637
Date of preparation: February 8, 2013
2-3
E./PROPPED
CALL LS PD
1741.4prt .L5POPD
DIJAPPILL
CLEO
0
,1
5000
SCALE IN FEET
30MP OR PL
opL.plop
PULL/MORD
SID
j
1
1
1
i
—
0
b
i
n
1 -
=.1111411PI R
I
M
O
O
K
SI
D
E
x • - - L:.:,..A.,,kiL,•'•-•,1
1 • ' L • II '4, '' - ' " 1 j'i , 1 • '-'"''''''''''' - ,ss.. 1 ',I'I<" l'I.I.II'iLIci,o-fii,-,.. E
I
,
e
_.
.,_.•
•
.Z
,
.
F
-
..RuI1
P;.,Lsoi- -L_
p,-S,
t;
.:0
'l
.
:.
..
i
-
.--o
P
• -
4
„
,
„
•,
:i
. L
.
, ti
41i
. .
:
I
,
s
W
u
m
.
0
.
.
I..
i
t
.
••
-
•I.-I
E
T.4
I
'—r
""
.
"
1
IV;
-
..1:-
•'--"--
. 1 i
-.."• --
'- - rg.44 ;1 ..„
.,„•
,
,`,'.,,',•5,-4
".:-
` '
s-',
;'s•'
, '
.
-'
rf
'•PL
H
• •-
- • -- r1. r' gLL '0 •• -- i
0
-
,1
i10
P
L
P
.
F
IO
L
I
P
1
.
.,
0
1
I
•
•-
,
1
i
E
L
M
M
•
00
0 °-t.
Q [
0 `
a
•
i
-
4,
_
c
,
.
.
.
4
U
,
1
P
E
o
.
M
:
-
;
-
'
.
.
,
_
,
•
a
'
-
-
•
.
,
-
=-
ryo
_
x
.
s
p
,
'
'
'
?
I
I,
!1
,i
I1
1
. i 1
i.• ------ -
SHAW RD MAO
¢DLLAROPLI .
!
OLLPOP PO I
P PPE
•
L
ILL ROO, / PAL L DI
•
Ll
1
n
• . •
1 _
pt.'s sem.
RCIEPLOP
'''''
wa.4 ow: .: 44
,-----
1 -,
1
a-.„. 1 R.
.........-_, I
ra-1 ...... , sann
lIchlwASI.
1
— — — --1 i
i 1 1 1
1 I
I ;
1 It
i
i - 1 . 1 ''
. E
.4714.
,
,
P
s
•
I
,
7
:
-
7•
,
-
,
1
,
i
0 0 0 E,, CEI
.1
P
O
•P
•
'
o
L
L
DEL PELL° SPUR
OODWOOOLVE
i
I'
rimFREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report ' NICHOLS
City of Pearland
2.4 Current and Projected Service Units
The maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of
required capital improvements by the total number of service units attributed to new
development during the impact fee eligibility period. A water service unit is defined as the
service equivalent to a water connection for a single-family residence. This is also known as an
equivalent single family connection (ESFC). The City of Pearland does not directly meter
wastewater flows and bills for wastewater services based on the customer's three-month
winter average water consumption. Therefore, a wastewater service unit is defined as the
wastewater service provided to a customer with a water connection for a single-family
residence.
The service associated with public, commercial, and industrial connections is converted into
equivalent service units. The City of Pearland currently uses an impact fee assessment based
on land use type.
Table 2.3 provides equivalent service unit factors for different types of developments which
occur in Pearland. This table will allow conversion of different developments to an equivalent
single-family connection (ESFC). All developments not matching one of the development types
below will be evaluated individually based on data submitted by the developer.
Future population projections as well as projected future land use growth percentages were
used to calculate the projected ten year growth in service units. Table 2.4 shows the current
and projected connections for the years 2012 and 2022 by land use type as provided by the
2012 Market Study Update.
2-5
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r1 NICHOLS
Table 2.3 City of Pearland Service Unit Factors
No.
Development Type
Unit of Measure
S.U.E.
Remarks
1
Bakery
Square Foot
0.000700
2
Barber Shop
Chair
0.470000
3
Beauty Salon
Bowl
0.470000
4
Bowling Alley
Lane
0.635000
Does not include restaurant
5
Car Repair
Square Foot
0.000160
Does not include carwash
6
Carwash,TunnelSelfService
Lane
6.350000
7
Carwash, Wand Type Self Service
Bay
1.220000
8
Carwash, Tunnel With Attendants
Lane
31.430000
Does not include reclamation
9
Church, Administration
Occupant
0.047000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
10
Church, Auditorium
Seat
0.003200
11
Church, Classroom
Seat
0.004700
12
Club/Tavern/Lounge
Seat
0.031000
13
Convenience Store
Square Foot
0.000220
14
Country Club
Occupant
0.390000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
15
Day Care Center
Occupant
0.031700
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
16
Dormitory
Bed
0.286000
17
Driving Range
Tee
0.210000
18
Fire Station
Employee
0.286000
19
Funeral Home
Embalming Station
2.140000
20
Gas Station, Self -Service
Island
0.800000
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not include carwash
21
Gas Station, Full -Service
Island
0.860000
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not include carwash
22
Grocery Store
Square Foot
0.000260
Does not include restaurant
23
Health Club
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
24
Health Club w/ Whirpool or Swimming Pool
Occupant
0.032000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
25
Hospital
Bed
0.635000
Patient Care Area - Does not include designated office areas
26
Hotel/Motel
Room
0.251000
Does not include restaurant
27
Hotel/Motel with Kitchenettes
Room
0.430000
28
Ice Cream Parlor with Seating
Seat
0.047000
29
Indoor Entertainment/Amusement w/o Restaurant
Occupant
0.031000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
30
Industrial Laundry
50 lbs
0.950000
31
Manufacturing
Square Foot
0.000160
Average: Each development must be individually evaluated
32
Nursing Home
Bed
0.286000
33
Office Building
Square Foot
0.000335
34
Photo Store, 1-Hour Processing
Store
4.000000
35
Post Office, Excluding Dock
Square Foot
0.000254
36
Raquetball Club
Court
0.510000
37
Recreational Vehicle Park
Space
0.238100
38
Resident, Apartment
Dwelling Unit
0.700000
Basic Service Unit
39
Resident, Condominium
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
40
Resident, Duplex
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
41
Resident, Mobile Home
Dwelling Unit
0.700000
42
Resident, Single Family
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
43
Resident, Town House
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
44
Restaurant, Full -Service, General
Seat
0.110000
45
Restaurant, Fast Food with Seating
Seat
0.047000
46
Restaurant, Fast Food without Seating
Square Foot
0.002300
47
Restaurant, Buffet with Seating*
Seat
0.110000
*Non -disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
48
Restaurant, Buffet with Seating**
Seat
0.070500
**Disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
49
Retail Store
Square Foot
0.000223
50
School, High
Seat
0.047600
Does not include resident dormitory
51
School, Other
Seat
0.031700
Does not include resident dormitory
52
Skating Rink
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
53
Swimming Pool
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
54
Stadium
Seat
0.010000
55
Theatre, Drive-in
Space
0.016000
56
Theatre, Indoor
Seat
0.016000
57
Toilet (non-specific)
Toilet
0.254000
58
Transportation Terminal without Restaurant
Passenger
0.016000
59
Warehouse
Square Foot
0.000100
60
Washateria
Machine
1.580000
2-6
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
Table 2.4 Service Unit Projection(1)(2)
.NM F&NICNOLS
Land Use
2012
2022
Growth
in
Service
Units
Impact Fee
Eligible
Connections(3)
S.U.E.s
Service
Units
Impact Fee
Eligible
Connections
S.U.E.s
Service
Units
Single Family
26,359
1.0
26,359
36,399
1.0
36,399
8,107
Multi-Family(4)
4,504
0.7
3,153
7,212
0.7
5,048
3,301
Total Residential
30,863
29,512
43,611
41,447
11,408
Commercial /Industrial
1,954
4.0
7,816
4,273
4.0
17,092
9,276
Assisted Livings)
569
0.286
163
625
0.286
179
16
Hospital
0
0.635
0
300
0.635
191
191
Total
33,386
37,491
48,809
58,909
21,418
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Date of preparation: February 8, 2013
Source: City of Pearland Inspection Services Department
Connections were reduced by MUD 1 and increased by MUD 16 connections.
Apartment Units are substituted for connections.
Beds are substituted for connections.
2.5 Construction Trends
Historical construction data by type, beginning in 2007, are presented in Table 2.5. As shown, a
total of 5,125 residential and 289 commercial/industrial building permits have been granted
between 2007 and 2011. Based on recent growth data, the City anticipates continued
development in the next ten years.
Table 2.5 Construction Permits Granted
Land Use
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
5-Yr Total
Residential
1,606
n
1,242
829
727
721
5,125
Commercial
77
52
78
40
42
289
Total
1,683
1,294
907
767
763
5,414
Existing major subdivisions in the City with vacant lot inventory include the following: Southern
Trails, Southgate, Cambridge Lakes, Lakes of Highland Glenn, Cabot Cove, Shadow Creek Ranch,
Pearland Farms, Park at Walnut Bend, Stonebridge, La Paloma, Bellavita, Pearland Park Estates,
Village at Mary's Creek, Canterberry Park, Twin Lakes, Village Grove, Cypress Village, Avalon
Terrace, Oakbrook Estates, Preserve at Highland Glen and Emerald Stone.
2-7
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rii NICHOLS
City of Pearland
3.0 WATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Water system impact fee capital improvements were provided by the City of Pearland. The
recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and reliability to meet
projected water demands through year 2022.
3.1 Existing System
Currently, Pearland provides potable water from eleven wells plus three surface water plants.
The current surface water contract for the Shadow Creek Water Plant is take -or -pay 40 million
gallons per month (1,333,333 gpd) with a maximum day capacity of 6 million gallons per day
(MGD). The current surface water contract for the Alice Water Plant is pay-as-you-go 10 MGD.
Table 3.1 presents the existing water supply facilities, including their pumping and storage
ca pacities.
Table 3.1 Existing Water Supply Facilities
Water Source
Booster Pumps
Ground
Storage
(gal)
Elevated
Storage
(gal)
Water Plant
Surface
(gpd)
Well
(gpm)
No.
Capacity
(gpm)
McLean
-
600
3
600
427,000
500,000
Mary's Creek
-
747
3
600
460,000
-
Old City Hall
-
535
2
500
327,000
-
Alice
10,000,000
-
3
3,500
5,000,000
500,000
Liberty
-
1,330
3
1,000
460,000
500,000
Magnolia
-
1,000
3
900
460,000
-
Garden
-
1,448
3
800
460,000
-
Southeast
-
1,800
3
2,100
1,000,000
1,000,000
Cullen
-
1,400
3
2,100
600,000
1,000,000
Kirby
-
2,200
3
1,800
1,000,000
1,000,000
Southdown
-
1,250
3
1,000
500,000
-
Country Place
-
1,050
2
1
1,000
650
500,000
Shadow Creek
1,333,333
-
5
2,000
3,200,000
-
Green Tee
100,000
-
2
500
210,000
-
Total
11,433,333
13,360
42
19,050
14,604,000
4,500,000
3-1
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report ini,NICHOLS
City of Pearland
Table 3.2 presents the average water production for the city over the past six years. The
average daily usage over the past five years has been 11.02 MGD. The average gallons per
capita per day (gpcd) has ranged from a low of 100 gpcd to a high of 147 gpcd during the 2011
drought. Public consumption includes all metered irrigation systems.
Table 3.2 Water Production in Million Gallons (2007 — 2012)
Month
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
January
180
210
239
236
257
298
February
178
214
226
225
251
255
March
235
238
278
263
354
291
April
228
267
270
316
454
325
May
240
346
339
419
515
397
June
246
336
436
386
535
400
July
203
371
438
323
503
337
August
255
312
385
408
527
456
September
241
289
321
329
473
409
October
241
298
277
407
397
410
November
245
248
276
288
318
385
December
216
240
243
270
273
330
Total
2707
3370
3728
3868
4857
4292
Daily Average
7.42
9.23
10.21
10.60
13.31
11.76
Impact Fee Eligible
Population
74,015
79,953
84,529
87,842
90,690
95,101
Average Demand
(gpcd)
100
115
121
121
147
124
3.2 Future Planned System
The City of Pearland anticipates decommissioning the Green Tee and Old City Hall Water Plants
in the next 5 years. In addition, the City anticipates infrastructure improvements that will allow
them to receive 6 MGD surface water (the amount of their current contract) at the Shadow
Creek Water Plant in 2015. Table 3.3 presents the future planned water supply facilities,
including their pumping and storage capacities.
3-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r
1 NICHOLS
Table 3.3 Future Planned Water Supply Facilities
Water Source
Booster Pumps
Ground
Storage
(gal)
Elevated
Storage
(gal)
Water Plant
Surface
(gpd)
Well
(gpm)
No.
Capacity
(gpm)
McLean
-
600
3
600
427,000
500,000
Mary's Creek
-
747
3
600
460,000
-
Alice
10,000,000
-
3
3,500
5,000,000
500,000
Liberty
-
1,330
3
1,000
460,000
500,000
Magnolia
-
1,000
3
900
460,000
-
Garden
-
1,448
3
800
460,000
-
Southeast
-
1,800
3
2,100
1,000,000
1,000,000
Cullen
-
1,400
3
2,100
600,000
1,000,000
Kirby
-
2,200
3
1,800
1,000,000
1,000,000
Southdown
-
1,250
3
1,000
500,000
-
Country Place
-
1,050
2
1,000
500,000
Shadow Creek
6,000,000
-
5
2,000
3,200,000
-
Total
16,000,000
12,825
38
17,400
14,067,000
4,500,000
3.3 Water System Projections
The population and land use data was used to develop future water demands based on the
average day per connection usage history and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ) requirements. Table 3.4 presents the City's existing and projected water demands.
Currently, the City has a 10 MGD surface water supply pay-as-you-go contract with the City of
Houston, in addition to 1.333 MGD take -or -pay contract and the eleven water wells with a total
capacity of 19.24 MGD (13,360 gpm) for a total system capacity of 30.67 MGD. According to
TCEQ's criteria of 0.6 gpm per connection, the required current supply should be 28.85 MGD
(94% of actual supply). However, based on a maximum day demand of 18,354,300 gallons on
July 29, 2008, the City applied for and received an Alternative Capacity Requirement variance
from TCEQ for 0.47 gpm per connection. Therefore, according to the TCEQ variance, the
required current supply is 22.60 MGD and the City currently has an excess water supply of 8.08
MGD.
3-3
JJ
1/10
WV_
•
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
System Capacity and Projected Water Demands
a)
cc
Excess or (Deficient) Capacity
2022
1
1
1
1,434,069
(4,606,868)
a
r,
rn
N
O
h
o
m
(-NI
(380,900)
10,855,178
r,
coLn
N
i
l0
Cr).
00
(.()
628,039
O
00
N
mi.
Ln
co
N
12,152,340
273,000
12,425,340
2012
8,076,088
3,944,008
1,826,229
N
`-
t
N
c--1
O
O
cI
l0
r_i•
13,829,012
Future
Capacity(')
-a
v
C
C
(0
0_
1
1
1
34,468,000
34,468,000
34,468,000
14,067,000
O
0
0
Q
0
If)
18,567,000
Current
Capacity
2012
m
N
. I
L.0
O
M
1.
a-i
LID
O
m
N.
N-1
LSD
d
14,604,000
4,500,000
0
O
Cj
O
t-I
Required Capacity (gallons)
N
N
esi o
ill
n N
`-I
co
00
ce 00
co
rn
00'
Ln
33,033,931
39,074,868
l0
O
N
Gy.
N
or)
ci.
m
00
N
4,880,900
7,711,822
n
c-{
ON
1.0
N
sN-I
Htri.
42,270
49,974
28,608,336
CO
01
Ol
00
m
00
N
r-I
Lfl
m
1.0
l0
d'
N
4,227,000
1.0
l0
l0
2012
% -1
O
co
l0
CO00
mi.
m
% -1
CT)
r\
m
22,595,645
ill
^
^
N
^
us.
N
28,845,504
00
00
m
I./5(n
m
co
3,338,600
5,274,988
Impact Fee Eligible
Population(1)
Impact Fee Eligible
Connections(1)
Impact Fee Eligible
Equivalent Service
Units(2)
Water Production (gpd)
(Current Variance)(3)
Water Production (gpd)
(Projected Variance)(4)
Water Production (gpd)
(TCEQ Standard)(5)
Ground Storage (gal)
Elevated Storage (gal)
Total Storage (6)
(gal)
C
(o
QJ
it ate+ ��-I C7
o a, coco a)
o_ L N L -C
a) h° a) b°
cc a) L a) O
0) U •4 C U
CU LL C CO C c
(13
.L
4Q. •L C
o co 'a °CD
(0 > ) 0 > •7
Q_ ++ CO +-+ lLn
E v_o O v E
CO O E E
o �_ L1 O
N 7 0) a) O a)
a) a' C D O
s a) c 0) a)
++ 0 L f -
4-+
'O (� E U o
0) (o Q (o `+-
Q_ N
o (Qo eo d co
U w U
v > > 0
-a '+� o +� U
L (o
i C -coO (_ >`
O L c L a_.
a) a)- C a) U
w Q Q O.
C C E C c(0
0 0 3 0 0 -0-0a) -a-0 1.-
0
L
V) VI — V) V) d-+
Co oo LL m CO Li-
1-1 N m a 111 tD I�
0
C7
2
0
0
L
0
0
m
O
4-
C
(0
a)
ro
a)
0)
U
O
(o
N
a)
Q
0
C
(o
Q
a)
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
irmilfICIIOLS
According to TCEQ the alternative capacity requirement variance granted will be based on
115% of the maximum day demand over the previous three years. FNI recommends a
projected variance of 0.556 gpm/connection based on a July 4, 2011 maximum day demand.
Based on the equivalent service unit projections and the projected updated TCEQ variance, the
water supply need for the year 2022 will increase to 39.07 MGD. The supply need for 2022 will
be at 127% of current production and surface water contracts; therefore, it is necessary to add
additional water sources for the upcoming 10-year period. The capacity analysis for the water
system can be found in Appendix C.
The City has the option to purchase an additional 5 MGD from the Southeast Water Purification
Plant to be delivered to the Alice Water Plant. However, based on results from the City's water
model, the future water demands will be primarily on the west side of the City. The Alice Water
Plant will be unable to provide the sufficient pressure to serve these future water demands. In
anticipation of these future water demands, the City has acquired land and completed sand pit
stabilization for a new surface water treatment plant on the west side of the City. Therefore, it
is recommended that the City pursue the construction of a new 10 MGD surface water
treatment plant on the west side of the City in the next ten years.
The existing eleven water wells, with a capacity of 13,360 gpm, are a major source of water for
the City of Pearland. No new wells are proposed to be added to the City's system. However, if
new wells are drilled, TCEQ requires a minimum of two booster pumps (three pumps
recommended) with a minimum capacity of 1,000 gpm each (1,500 gpm is recommended).
To meet current state requirements, a minimum of two booster pumps with a total capacity of
1,000 gpm and the ability to meet peak hourly demands with the largest pump out of service,
are required at each booster pump station. With the exception of the Green Tee and Old City
Hall water plants, the booster pumps at every other water plant meet this requirement. An
additional booster pump is required at the Green Tee and Old City Hall Water Plants to meet
this requirement but the City plans to close the Green Tee and Old City Hall water plants.
3-5
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
FREESE
F8NICNOLS
The existing ground storage tanks, with a total capacity of 14,604,000 gallons, and five elevated
storage tanks, with a total capacity of 4,500,000 gallons, meet the current TCEQ storage
requirement. Based on a maximum day demand of 18,354,300 gallons on July 29, 2008, the
City applied for and received an Alternative Capacity Requirement variance from TCEQ for 158
gallons of total storage per connection. According to the TCEQ variance, for the year 2022, the
total required storage (ground and elevated) will be 7.71 million gallons. The City will have
18.57 million gallons of total storage in 2022. Therefore, the total storage requirement is met
for the upcoming 10- year period. The required elevated storage for the year 2022 will be 4.88
million gallons; however, the City currently has 4.5 million gallons of elevated storage.
Therefore, it is recommended that a minimum of 1.0 million gallons of elevated storage be
constructed in the 10-year time period.
3.4 Water Capital Improvements Plan
A summary of the costs for each of the projects required for the 10-year growth period used in
the impact fee analysis for the water system is shown in Table 3.5. The costs listed for the
existing projects are based on actual design and construction costs provided by the City. Table
3.5 shows the 2012 percent utilization as the portion of a project's capacity required to serve
existing development. This portion of the project cost is not eligible to be included in the
impact fee analysis. The 2022 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that
will be required to serve the City of Pearland in 2022. The 2012-2022 percent utilization is the
portion of the project's capacity required to serve development from 2012 to 2022. The
portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2012
through 2022 is calculated as the total actual cost multiplied by the 2012-2022 percent
utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The proposed 10-
year water system projects are shown on Figure 3.1. Individual descriptions and cost tables for
each project can be found in Appendix D.
3-6
Cost Based on 2012 Dollars I
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
EXISTING PROJECTS '
IN
Ol
O
.-I
.-I
VT
V1
V1
al
O
.I
M
N
In.
$ 7,846,716
$ 264,647 I
M
N
O
O
CO
ti
V}
$ 371,629I
CO
lD
V'
Ol
ID
.--1
V}
$ 2,476,314
$ 2,008,021I
.-i
M
O
ppl1
O
m
VT
$ 639,124I
ul
N
V1
00
.-I
%-1
0
N
V
al
N
Ol
V}
00
V1
M
M
CO
VT
I $ 340,721 I
N
•--I
O
Ql
f0
0
.-I
V}
'
V}
N
.-i
00
.--I
M
V}
$ 251,050
$ 28,797,251,
H
W
01
a-i
N
O
.4
V}
o
O
.-i
_
O
M
N
VT
o
Vl
N
OO
N
Ol
.-I
VT
$ 429,6001
S
.H
00
al
r�
VT
o
01
I-
V1
M
m
.-i
VT
$ 15,718,033 I
S
n
Vl
Ql
V)
VT
$ 1,408,200I
O
Vl
01
COri
00
0
.1
VT
0
lD
N
c-I
VT
$ 2,143,350I
$ 1,544,200
$ 1,200,350
$ 30,724,483 I
(11 Utilization in 2012 on Proposed Projects incudes a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system, and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost
recovery for future growth.
(Z) For existing projects, the project cost may be distributed over a 20-year or longer period by the issuance of bonds to support the projects. When that is the case, the amount of
the actual distribution of bond indebtedness is used in the impact fee calculations. For proposed 10-year projects, no debt issuance is assumed.
(3) Project is in the City of Pearland FY 2013 - 2017 CIP.
Beyond 2022(2)
$ 312,524 I
.-I
CFI
Ol
.OD
Cr
ry
V}
O
.-1
.-i
Oil
alj
VT',
$ 187,457
I
VT
i
VT
V}V}
fl
i
00
01
m
°.-I'
N
c
VT
$ 983,038
i
VT
VT
V}
i
V}
V}
i
VT
i
V}
i
V}
i
V}
M
m
m
0
00
01
M
V?
Vp}
V}
V}
V}
VT
VT
i
VT
M
M
m
0
0o
01
01
V}
N
0
$ 2,244,194 I
$ 4,621,910
F
$ 360,145
.^Il
N
m
V
N
VT
$ 4,952,628
$ 4,016,041
$ 1,278,247
V)
O
n
M
V}
O
d'
al
0O
V1
V}
I $ 681,442
N
O
OD
Vl
.-I
V}
OSSSSr.SSO
.-i
f
O
V1
VT
$ 57,594,502
$ 2,042,000
$ 460,200 I
u1
V1
00
VT
N
Vl
0O
VT
N
01
ul
V}
ul
.-I
N
N
O
m
cr
m
V}
cr
01
c-I
VT
V
.-I
00DIH
V}
01
N
V}
$ 2,523,800
$ 4,286,700
$ 3,088,400
$ 2,400,700 I
.D
t0
VT
Current
Development
V}
1411:1±::I::
±±±±±::
Project Cost
2,556,718
0
1
pp
Ol
$ 19,599,542
o�
_
lD
.i
r`
co.
lD
DI
VT
$ 743,257
cr,m
_
00
m
M
VT
$ 6,665,484I
$ 4,675,947
01
al
a1
M
VT
$ 2,066,461
0
n
m
VT
$ 26,809,000
coCOr0
1p
O
V
VT
_
lDO
.D
.--I
VT
$ 2,158,024I
$ 63,624
0
N
V10
V}
•
�a�
N
Nc'/1.-i
in.
_
O
.DVlVIQl.-1M01a-1NO
V
V}
.D
00
V}
o
Ql
GD
V}
g
.D
V)
V}
g
.-I
N
N
V}
r
N
V}
_
.--1
.-i
.-1
VT
g
iD
00
N
V}
al
a-1r.-1
NFvILV}VT
V}
$ 2,523,800I
I $ 4,286,7001
$ 3,088,400
$ 2,400,700
g
V}
Percent Utilization(i)
N NI 0
N N
PROPOSED 10-YEAR PRO;
SSSSSS�SSSSSSS
.-i
.-1
.
.-I
.-1
ci
'Proposed 10-Year Project Sub -Total
N
DI
N
g
.-1
o
.-1
%00T
o
.1
r-1NI
%00T
ID
%00T
8
g
8
%00T
8
S
C.4
*
0
00
*
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
*
0
�
0
al
0
�
0
ae
0
*
0
Description of Project
:Old Alvin Road 20" Water Line
McHard Road 16" Water Line
'Houston 30" Interconnect Transmission Line
Magnolia Rd 12" Water Line
:Bailey Rd 24" & 30" Water Transmission Lines
IBW 8 / SH 288 12" Water Line
SH 35 Water 16" Water Line - South of Magnolia Road
Kirby Water Plant & 1.0 MGD EST
Proposed WTP Property Acquisition & Sand Pit Stabilization
ISH 35 16" Water Line - FM 518 to Clear Creek
:Dixie Farm Rd 16" Water Line
Impact Fee Study
:Purchase 10 MGD from City of Houston
McHard Surface Water Connection & Line
Far Northwest Water Plant (Phase 1)
Far Northwest Water Plant Expansion (Phase 2)
Kingsley 20" Water Line - Broadway to Trinity Bay I
Hawk Road 12" Water Line
Pearland Pkwy 12" Water Line Extension
Existing Project Sub -Total
SH 35 16" Water Line - FM 518 to Magnolia(3)
Veterans Drive 12" Water Line
1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Riley Rd & Kirby Dr. 1
CR 94 12" Water Line(3)
FM 521 16" Water Line(3)
Fellows Rd. 12" Water Line(3) 1
10 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant (Phase 1)(3)
FM 1128 16" Water Line(3) .I
CR 10016" Water Line(3)
Harkey Rd. & CR 128 12" Water Lines(3)
Veterans Dr. 16" Water Line - Bailey Rd to CR 12813i
CR 48 North 30" & 20" Water Line
CR 59 20" Water Line 1
Far Northwest Water Plant Expansion (Phase 3)
4
m
U
0
W
W
L7
2—
Y
Z
0
G.
0.
0C
H
.-I
N
01
a
N
to
N
CO
01
O
.-I
N
M,i
Cost Based on 2012 Dollars
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
I PROPOSED PROTECTS BEYOND 10-YEAR PERIOD I
VT
V}
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
iA
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
UT
iR
$ 59,521,734
N
o
N
C
>.
01
CO
0
Q
0
N
N
+n
o
l�0
.-i
th
0
.�-I
Lf
in
$ 9,691,000 j
00
N
,-I
1/
a
N
. i
11-
$ 2,824,500 {
$ 12,116,500
m
N
M
11
$ 1,434,800
$ 2,209,400
N
001
,-I
AA
$ 2,166,300 J
$ 2,262,300
0
u
N
to
$ 929,200
co 00
OM1
N
,n
$ 53,767,400
a
00
O
'4
of
10-Year
(2012-2022)
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
V}
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
$ 119,043,469
Current
Development
UR
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
tn.
VT
in.
VT
in
VT
1J
VT
in.
VT
VT
Project Cost
O
OO
0
N
N
VT
$ 1,645,000
$ 5,142,900
0
l
01
lD
01
VT
0
N
01
N
'i
VT
$ 1,265,900
$ 2,824,500
0
tD
ri
.-I
fV
,-1
VT
0m
W
00
N
m
VT
$ 1,434,800
$ 2,209,400
O
,
CO
00
'i
VT
$ 2,166,300
$ 2,262,300
O
0
O1
ul
N'
VT
$ 929,200
$ 2,935,800
$ 53,767,400
$ 230,070,642
Percent Utilizationill
N N
N
0 O
N N
Proposed Projects Beyond 10-Year Period Sub -Total
Total Cost
N
0
N
0
N
Description of Project
Purchase 5 MGD from City of Houston
0.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Garden Road Water Plant
Bailey Road 24" Water Line - Veterans Drive to FM 1128
Bailey Road 24" Water Line - FM 1128 to CR 48
State Highway 35 12" Water Line
Hughes Ranch & Stone Road 12" Water Line
Broadway (FM 518) 16" Water Line
Far East Water Plant, Elevated Storage & 12" Water Lines
Alice Water Plant Expansion (Phase 2)
Roy Road 12" Water Line
FM 521 & Riley Road 12" Water Lines
CR 129 & CR 127 12" Water Lines —J
Hastings Cannon Road (CR 128) 12" Water Line
Hastings Field Road 16" Water Line
CR 59 & CR 564 12" & 16" Water Lines
CR 564 12" Water Line - CR 59 to Broadway
1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Dixie Farm & FM 518
z
aN-1
'i
,1
'�-I
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
m•
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rii NICHOLS
City of Pearland
4.0 WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Wastewater system impact fee capital improvements were provided by the City of Pearland.
These recommended improvements will ensure that the City of Pearland can handle projected
wastewater flows resulting from residential and commercial growth through the year 2022
while maintaining high quality service.
4.1 Existing System
There are currently five wastewater treatment plants in the City of Pearland: JHEC, Longwood,
Barry Rose, Far Northwest & Southdown. The location of each wastewater treatment plant can
be seen on Figure 4.1 and the current permitted capacity is shown in Table 4.1. The current
total capacity of the plants is 11.55 million gallons per day.
Table 4.1 Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Wastewater
Plant
Permitted
Plant Capacity
(MGD)
Barry Rose
3.1
Longwood
2.5
JHEC
4.0
Southdown
0.95
Far Northwest
2.0
Total
11.55
Table 4.2 details the monthly wastewater flows seen at each of the five wastewater treatment
plants since 2008.
4-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
Table 4.2 Wastewater Flow to E
JHEC WWTP
Longwood WWTP
Month
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2008
January
47
38
73
57
60
65
44
52
47
39
74
February
41
32
75
41
76
57
44
54
36
44
57
March
38
36
59
43
80
64
43
47
36
45
63
April
40
97
53
43
65
48
74
41
38
35
40
May
42
79
55
43
68
50
51
44
38
42
42
June
43
36
56
53
49
56
49
45
36
46
47
July
42
39
81
56
58
51
50
69
36
59
39
August
45
51
46
57
48
57
44
40
33
47
55
September
45
44
52
53
49
56
41
44
30
47
34
October
42
64
47
58
48
43
64
35
33
44
48
November
42
50
51
54
45
48
44
41
31
42
54
December
39
88
54
63
51
45
68
43
39
54
46
Total
506
654
704
622
698
640
615
555
432
543
598
Daily
Average
1.39
1.79
1.93
1.70
1.91
1.75
1.69
1.52
1.18
1.49
1.64
Permitted
Capacity
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
3.1
3-mo Avg
Permitted
Capacity
37%
44%
40%
47%
61%
83%
78%
70%
53%
68%
70%
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report Fil LNICHOLS
City of Pearland
The TCEQ provides design criteria to be used as minimum guidelines for wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal systems. As part of the permitting requirements, whenever flow
measurement for any wastewater treatment plant reaches 75% of the permitted average flow
for three consecutive months, design for expansion or upgrading the facility should be initiated.
TCEQ recommends that the expansion be under construction when the plant reaches 90% of
permitted average flow. The Far Northwest plant exceeded the threshold of 75% of permitted
average flow in 2012 and the Longwood plant is at 68% of permitted capacity. It is
recommended to begin design for expansion or diversion of those facilities.
Table 4.3 summarizes the 2007 to 2012 total wastewater flows to all treatment plants. The
flows shown include some infiltration and inflow (I & I) entering the collection system.
Table 4.3 Total Wastewater Flow in Million Gallons (2007 — 2011)
0.) Total population estimate reduced by MUD 1 and increased by MUD 16 populations.
Month
Wastewater Flow (MG)
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
January
232
222
159
205
207
186
February
154
188
144
216
156
210
March
202
201
156
181
165
227
April
183
156
271
159
163
186
May
191
165
200
166
164
201
June
183
177
159
167
158
179
July
268
162
166
258
164
236
August
183
191
179
162
162
192
September
181
169
161
179
151
192
October
160
168
233
156
169
184
November
169
179
170
173
159
174
December
156
164
265
185
189
178
Total
2,262
2,142
2,263
2,207
2,007
2,344
Daily Average
6.20
5.87
6.20
6.05
5.50
6.40
Impact Fee Eligible
Population(')
73,937
79,875
84,451
87,764
90,612
95,023
Average Flow (gpcd)
84
73
73
69
61
68
MUD 16 has 31 fewer wastewater connections than water connections.
4-3
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
IrailliTE2Es
Based on the average flows shown in Table 4.3 and an estimated impact fee eligible population
of 95,023 in 2012, the per capita wastewater flow is 68 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). This
average flow has ranged from 61 to 84 gpcd.
4.2 Wastewater System Projections
The population and land use data was used to develop future wastewater flows based on the
average day per connection flow history and TCEQ requirements. A per capita of 100 gpcd was
used to project future wastewater flows. Table 4.4 presents the existing and projected
wastewater flows for the City versus system capacity.
Table 4.4 System Capacity and Projected Wastewater Flows
Required Capacity gallons)
Current
Capacity
Excess or (Deficient) Capacity
2012
2017
2022
2012
2012
2017
2022
Impact Fee Eligible
Population(1'2)
95,023
112,138
127,677
Impact Fee Eligible
Connections(2)
33,355
42,239
48,778
-
-
-
-
Impact Fee Eligible
Equivalent Service
Units(3)
37,460
49,943
58,878
-
-
-
-
Equivalent Persons/
Service Unit(4)
2.5
2.4
2.3
Wastewater Flow
Rate Per Person Per
Day (gpcd)
100
100
100
Wastewater Flow
Rate Per Service
Unit Per Day
250
240
230
Total Wastewater
Flow (MGD)
9.36
11.99
13.54
11.55
2.19
(0.44)
(1.99)
1) Total estimate reduced by MUD 1 and increased by MUD 16 populations/connections.
(2) MUD 16 has 31 fewer wastewater connections than water connections.
(3) Based on factors developed in the 2007 Impact Fee Report Service Unit Equivalents (S.U.E.).
(4) The equivalent persons/service unit decreases due to the large projected increase in
commercial connections. The equivalent persons/service unit was reduced by 0.1 every 5
years.
4-4
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
4.3 Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan
FREESE
rimBNICNOLS
A summary of the costs for each of the projects required for the 10-year growth period used in
the impact fee analysis for the wastewater system is shown in Table 4.5. The costs listed for
the existing projects are based on actual design and construction costs provided by the City.
Table 4.5 shows the 2012 percent utilization as the portion of a project's capacity required to
serve existing development. This portion of the project cost is not included in the impact fee
analysis. The 2022 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that will be
required to serve the City of Pearland in 2022. The 2012-2022 percent utilization is the portion
of the project's capacity required to serve development from 2012 to 2022. The portion of a
project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2012 through
2022 is calculated as the total actual cost multiplied by the 2012-2022 percent utilization. Only
this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The proposed 10-year wastewater
system projects are shown on Figure 4.1. Individual descriptions and cost tables for each
project can be found in Appendix E.
4-5
Cost Based on 2012 Dollars
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
coo6
0
ri
VT
$ 1,447,467
$ 1,632,604
$ 942,300
$ 5,042,404
$ 265,235
$ 304,810
art
lD
1.1
VT
o
.-i
hi
N
.h
$ 182,886I
oho
rn
LD
00
v}
$ 27,085,799I
8
1n
cn
/n
$ 2,267,524I
$ 374,700
0
a`oo IT
N
.4
VT
$ 1,254,125 I
0
o
Qa1
.-i
VT
0
u1
LLD
�i
VT
$ 830,850 I
$ 1,357,600
$ 2,821,780
$ 17,804,539
Uri
VT
VT
VT
I
V!
co
m
W
v
a
VT
(1' Utilization in 2012 on Proposed Projects includes a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system, and therefore are not eligible for impact fee cost
recovery for future growth.
(2) For existing projects, the project cost may be distributed over a 20-year or longer period by the issuance of bonds to support the projects. When that is the case, the amount of
the actual distribution of bond indebtedness is used in the impact fee calculations. For proposed 10-year projects, no debt issuance is assumed.
(3) Project is in the City of Pearland FY 2013 - 2017 CIP.
(4) A portion (55%) of the Southdown WWTP Expansion or Diversion will address existing deficencies in the system and is not impact fee eligible.
Beyond 2022(2)
VT
$ 647,845
to
O
lhD
.-I
N
VT
VT
VT
$ 430,662
VT
01
V
t0
m
VT
$ 244,142
$ 741,475
t0
N
O
.M-1
V
PROPOSED 10-YEAR PROJECTS
VT
N
t00
.
tm0
ai
VT
VT
'
VT
lD
m
W
.-i
m
+n
$ 3,882,100
01
W
N
oho
m
ri
I.R.
VT
VT
$ 19,541,440
h
R
rl
N
O
to
V1,
(PROPOSED PROJECTS BEYOND 10-YEAR PERIOD
O
Om
00
Om
0
.1
VT
0
ON
Ili
m
m
VT
O
OV1
n
W
N.'
VT
$ 25,185,000
$ 42,206,000
M
ry
0a0
a
to
Q1
VT
N
,"I
O
L N
14 O
N N
C
$ 21,576,337
m
m
01
N'
VT
$ 3,265,208I
8
1p
.-I
VT
$ 10,084,807
$ 530,470
O
N
l0
lOD
in.
$ 11,200,625
$ 584,219
$ 365,772
$ 37,050I
h
01
111
.h-1
a
M
i?
$ 181,000 I
$ 4,535,048
$ 749,400
p
O'
h
N
VT
$ 2,508,249
$ 3,882,100
rl
N
.-i
CO
1
.-i
ih
O
h
l0
.-i
VT
O
O
N
h
N
VT
O
lD
L!1
l00
Ln
VT
$ 35,609,078
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
$ 89,780,675
Current
Development
th
VT
i
VT
VT
i
VT
VT
i
i
.
.
T
i
VT
i
$ 6,925,875
IF
i
VT
i
VT
i
VT
i
VT
i
VT
$ 6,925,875
Project Cost
CO00
r1
O
V
01
Oi
ci
VT
$ 3,542,778
$ 4,935,371
pp
O
tD
00
0o
rl
VT
.m-I
00
M
0o
N
m
VT
$ 530,470 I
$ 1,040,282
•
-
h
O
0o
01
in.
.�i
Ol
0
t0
VT
ON
O
h
m
VT
$ 49,164,616
$ 181,000
O
IN
l0
l0
.-1
'
.1
VT
O
V
01
V
IN
VT
O
h
In
N
VT
O
to
N
01
Ill
N
.--1
VT
$ 7,764,200
O
O
6
CO
.-I
to
N
VT
8
h
.-1
l0
l0
.-1
VR
0
fV
to
1-1
h
N'
VT
$ 25,185,000I
O
m
00
O
m
o
.-1
V1
O
N
In
01
o0
or;
VT
S
m
h
1-1
00
N
VT
$ 25,185,000I
Percent Utilization�1
Existing Project Sub -Total _
O
1-1
m
O
.-I
0
r1
N
0
V
O
r1
0
r1
N
Proposed 10-Year Project Sub -Total
II
Proposed Projects Beyond 10-Year Period Sub -Total
(Total Cost
00
O
.1
r
m
0
0
1-1
.-I
N
0
In
V
r1
0p)
0
rI
4
IN
N
0
0
0
0
e,
00
Lf1
0
0
0
0
0
Description of Project
JHEC WWTP 1.65 MGD Expansion
Magnolia Corridor Trunk Sewer
SH 35 30" Trunk Sewer
BW 8 / SH 288 12" FM and Sanitary Sewer Line
SH 35 18" Sewer - Broadway to Clear Creek
Veterans Dr 27" Sewer - Wells to Bailey Rd
Shadow Creek Parkway Trunk Sewer (Phase 1)
Far Northwest WWTP (Phase 1)
Shadow Creek Parkway Trunk Sewer (Phase 2) _
Barry Rose WWTP Expansion J
Longwood WWTP Expansion
Impact Fee Study
Broadway 12" Sanitary Sewer - Liberty to Pirate's Cove(3) J
Barry Rose WWTP 1.4 MGD Expansion (3)
Riverstone Ranch Lift Station & Sanitary Sewer
Roy/Max/Garden Roads Basin Sewage System131
Southdown WWTP Expansion or Diversion(3)
Veterans Drive Lift Station Service Areal')
Far Northwest WWTP Expansion [ Cost Sharing]
McHard Road Trunk Sewer(3)
Cullen to WWTP Trunk Sewer
JHEC WWTP 2.0 MGD Expansion (Phase 3)i3i
Harkey Road Trunk Sewer South of Ravenwood
Dixie Farm - SH 35 Trunk Sewer
Miller Ranch Road Lift Station & Collection System
Far Northwest WWTP Expansion (Phase 3)
Q
m
U❑
W
LL
O
_-
-.
Y
J
.1
N
M
a
N
l0
CO
1
N
.N-1
.Mi
..11
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
IFilFNIIIIVOEs
The impact fee analysis involves determining the utilization of existing and proposed projects
required as defined by the capital improvement plan to serve new development over the next
10-year time period. For existing or proposed projects, the impact fee is calculated as a
percentage of the project cost, based upon the percentage of the project's capacity required to
serve development projected to occur between 2012 and 2022. Capacity serving existing
development and development projected for more than 10 years in the future cannot be
charged to impact fees.
5.1 Maximum Impact Fee Determination
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code states that the maximum impact fee may not
exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements required by the
total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility
period.
Chapter 395 also requires that the impact fee, actually charged, be either discounted 50% from
the computed maximum fee or establish a reimbursement method for ad valorem tax and
utility service revenues generated and take a credit for any debt payment included in the CIP.
The City of Pearland has historically used the 50% credit option due to the complexity of
tracking impact fees and the implementation of the required reimbursement method. For
these reasons, the 50% credit option was used for this study.
The City of Pearland has previously separated the impact fees for the City and the Shadow
Creek development. Because the Shadow Creek and City systems have become so
interconnected, the City opted to combine the impact fee for this 2012 update.
The total projected costs include the projected capital improvement costs to serve 10-year
development, the projected finance cost for the capital improvements, and the consultant cost
for preparing and updating the Capital Improvements Plan. Table 5.1 summarizes the water
and wastewater impact fee calculation.
5-1
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
rBNICMOLS
Table 5.1 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation
Water Impact Fee
Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs
$119,043,469
Total Eligible Costs with Credit')
$59,521,734
Growth in Service Units
21,418
Maximum Water Impact Fee per Service Unit(2):
$2,779
Wastewater Impact Fee
Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs
$89,780,675
Total Eligible Costs with Credit')
$44,890,338
Growth in Service Units
21,418
Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee per Service Unit(�):
$2,096
Total Water & Wastewater Impact Fee: $4,875
Ill 50% of Total Capital Improvement Costs
(2) Total Eligible Costs/Growth in Service Units
5.2 Impact Fee Assessment
The City of Pearland currently uses an impact fee assessment based on the land use of the
proposed development. The impact fee for a single-family dwelling land use is proposed to be
$2,779 for water and $2,096 for wastewater, for a total of $4,875. For a multi -family dwelling,
according to Table 2.4, the rate would be 0.75 of that for a single-family dwelling. For
commercial developments, the impact fee will be assessed according to the unit of measure fo
the development type as seen in Table 2.3.
5-2
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
6.0 IMPACT FEE ADOPTION
6.1 Public Hearing
111M&NICNOLS
The amended Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires a public hearing to be
held to present any update of the impact fee. The presentation shall include a discussion of the
new land use assumptions and capital improvements plan. The hearing was held on April 22,
2013 at the Pearland City Hall. The presentation by Freese and Nichols, Inc. at the public
hearing is presented in Appendix F.
6.2 Ordinance
Once the public hearing is held, the political subdivision shall approve or disapprove the
amendment of the capital improvement plan and modification of the impact fee within 30 days
after the public hearing. At a City Council meeting on May 13, 2013, Council adopted the
impact fee update assessment that was presented at the public hearing. A copy of the City
Ordinance adopting the impact fee update assessment is presented in Appendix G.
6-1
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report raRNICHOI.S
City of Pearland
APPENDIX A:
Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code
A-1
CHAPTER 395. FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY NEW
DEVELOPMENT IN MUNICIPALITIES, COUNTIES, AND CERTAIN OTHER LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS
SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 395.001. Definitions
In this chapter:
(1) "Capital improvement" means any of the following facilities that have a life expectancy of three or
more years and are owned and operated by or on behalf of a political subdivision:
(A) water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities; wastewater collection and treatment facilities;
and storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities; whether or not they are located within the service
area; and
(B) roadway facilities.
(2) "Capital improvements plan" means a plan required by this chapter that identifies capital
improvements or facility expansions for which impact fees may be assessed.
(3) "Facility expansion" means the expansion of the capacity of an existing facility that serves the same
function as an otherwise necessary new capital improvement, in order that the existing facility may serve
new development. The term does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an
existing facility to better serve existing development.
(4) "Impact fee" means a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new
development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or
facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development. The term includes
amortized charges, lump -sum charges, capital recovery fees, contributions in aid of construction, and
any other fee that functions as described by this definition. The term does not include:
(A) dedication of land for public parks or payment in lieu of the dedication to serve park needs;
(B) dedication of rights -of -way or easements or construction or dedication of on -site or off -site water
distribution, wastewater collection or drainage facilities, or streets, sidewalks, or curbs if the dedication
or construction is required by a valid ordinance and is necessitated by and attributable to the new
development;
(C) lot or acreage fees to be placed in trust funds for the purpose of reimbursing developers for
oversizing or constructing water or sewer mains or lines; or
(D) other pro rata fees for reimbursement of water or sewer mains or lines extended by the political
subdivision.
1
However, an item included in the capital improvements plan may not be required to be constructed
except in accordance with Section 395.019(2), and an owner may not be required to construct or
dedicate facilities and to pay impact fees for those facilities.
(5) "Land use assumptions" includes a description of the service area and projections of changes in land
uses, densities, intensities, and population in the service area over at least a 10-year period.
(6) "New development" means the subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,
conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any structure; or any use or extension of
the use of land; any of which increases the number of service units.
(7) "Political subdivision" means a municipality, a district or authority created under Article III, Section
52, or Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution, or, for the purposes set forth by Section
395.079, certain counties described by that section.
(8) "Roadway facilities" means arterial or collector streets or roads that have been designated on an
officially adopted roadway plan of the political subdivision, together with all necessary appurtenances.
The term includes the political subdivision's share of costs for roadways and associated improvements
designated on the federal or Texas highway system, including local matching funds and costs related to
utility line relocation and the establishment of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage appurtenances, and
rights -of -way.
(9) "Service area" means the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction, as
determined under Chapter 42, of the political subdivision to be served by the capital improvements or
facilities expansions specified in the capital improvements plan, except roadway facilities and storm
water, drainage, and flood control facilities. The service area, for the purposes of this chapter, may
include all or part of the land within the political subdivision or its extraterritorial jurisdiction, except for
roadway facilities and storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities. For roadway facilities, the
service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall
not exceed six miles. For storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities, the service area may include
all or part of the land within the political subdivision or its extraterritorial jurisdiction, but shall not
exceed the area actually served by the storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities designated in
the capital improvements plan and shall not extend across watershed boundaries.
(10) "Service unit" means a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or discharge
attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted
engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political
subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years.
Added by Acts 1989, 71 st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Amended by Acts 1989, 71 st Leg., ch.
566, § 1(e), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
2
SUBCHAPTER B. AUTHORIZATION OF IMPACT FEE
§ 395.011. Authorization of Fee
(a) Unless otherwise specifically authorized by state law or this chapter, a governmental entity or
political subdivision may not enact or impose an impact fee.
(b) Political subdivisions may enact or impose impact fees on land within their corporate boundaries or
extraterritorial jurisdictions only by complying with this chapter, except that impact fees may not be
enacted or imposed in the extraterritorial jurisdiction for roadway facilities.
(c) A municipality may contract to provide capital improvements, except roadway facilities, to an area
outside its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction and may charge an impact fee under the
contract, but if an impact fee is charged in that area, the municipality must comply with this chapter.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.012. Items Payable by Fee
(a) An impact fee may be imposed only to pay the costs of constructing capital improvements or facility
expansions, including and limited to the:
(1) construction contract price;
(2) surveying and engineering fees;
(3) land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert
witness fees; and
(4) fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial
consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political
subdivision.
(b) Projected interest charges and other finance costs may be included in determining the amount of
impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or
other obligations issued by or on behalf of the political subdivision to finance the capital improvements
or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan and are not used to reimburse bond
funds expended for facilities that are not identified in the capital improvements plan.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Edwards Underground Water District or a
river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that function as impact fees may
use impact fees to pay a staff engineer who prepares or updates a capital improvements plan under this
chapter.
(d) A municipality may pledge an impact fee as security for the payment of debt service on a bond, note,
or other obligation issued to finance a capital improvement or public facility expansion if:
(1) the improvement or expansion is identified in a capital improvements plan; and
3
(2) at the time of the pledge, the governing body of the municipality certifies in a written order,
ordinance, or resolution that none of the impact fee will be used or expended for an improvement or
expansion not identified in the plan.
(e) A certification under Subsection (d)(2) is sufficient evidence that an impact fee pledged will not be
used or expended for an improvement or expansion that is not identified in the capital improvements
plan.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg.,
ch. 90, § 1, eff. May 16, 1995.
§ 395.013. Items Not Payable by Fee
Impact fees may not be adopted or used to pay for:
(1) construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than capital improvements
or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan;
(2) repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facility expansions;
(3) upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing
development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards;
(4) upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to provide better service
to existing development;
(5) administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision, except the Edwards Underground
Water District or a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that function
as impact fees may use impact fees to pay its administrative and operating costs;
(6) principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness, except as
allowed by Section 395.012.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.014. Capital Improvements Plan
(a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan
and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the
following items:
(1) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade,
update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter
safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified
professional engineer licensed to perform the professional engineering services in this state;
4
(2) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of
the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed
to perform the professional engineering services in this state;
(3) a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs
necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use
assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform the
professional engineering services in this state;
(4) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or
discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an
equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses,
including residential, commercial, and industrial;
(5) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development
within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with
generally accepted engineering or planning criteria;
(6) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units
projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and
(7) a plan for awarding:
(A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units
during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt,
that are included in the capital improvements plan; or
(B) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital
improvements plan.
(b) The analysis required by Subsection (a)(3) may be prepared on a systemwide basis within the service
area for each major category of capital improvement or facility expansion for the designated service
area.
(c) The governing body of the political subdivision is responsible for supervising the implementation of
the capital improvements plan in a timely manner.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.015. Maximum Fee Per Service Unit
(a) The impact fee per service unit may not exceed the amount determined by subtracting the amount in
Section 395.014(a)(7) from the costs of the capital improvements described by Section 395.014(a)(3)
and dividing that amount by the total number of projected service units described by Section
395.014(a)(5).
5
(b) If the number of new service units projected over a reasonable period of time is less than the total
number of new service units shown by the approved land use assumptions at full development of the
service area, the maximum impact fee per service unit shall be calculated by dividing the costs of the
part of the capital improvements necessitated by and attributable to projected new service units
described by Section 395.014(a)(6) by the projected new service units described in that section.
Added by Acts 1989, 7l st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 3, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.016. Time for Assessment and Collection of Fee
(a) This subsection applies only to impact fees adopted and land platted before June 20, 1987. For land
that has been platted in accordance with Subchapter A, Chapter 212, or the subdivision or platting
procedures of a political subdivision before June 20, 1987, or land on which new development occurs or
is proposed without platting, the political subdivision may assess the impact fees at any time during the
development approval and building process. Except as provided by Section 395.019, the political
subdivision may collect the fees at either the time of recordation of the subdivision plat or connection to
the political subdivision's water or sewer system or at the time the political subdivision issues either the
building permit or the certificate of occupancy.
(b) This subsection applies only to impact fees adopted before June 20, 1987, and land platted after that
date. For new development which is platted in accordance with Subchapter A, Chapter 212, or the
subdivision or platting procedures of a political subdivision after June 20, 1987, the political subdivision
may assess the impact fees before or at the time of recordation. Except as provided by Section 395.019,
the political subdivision may collect the fees at either the time of recordation of the subdivision plat or
connection to the political subdivision's water or sewer system or at the time the political subdivision
issues either the building permit or the certificate of occupancy.
(c) This subsection applies only to impact fees adopted after June 20, 1987. For new development which
is platted in accordance with Subchapter A, Chapter 212, or the subdivision or platting procedures of a
political subdivision before the adoption of an impact fee, an impact fee may not be collected on any
service unit for which a valid building permit is issued within one year after the date of adoption of the
impact fee.
(d) This subsection applies only to land platted in accordance with Subchapter A, Chapter 212, or the
subdivision or platting procedures of a political subdivision after adoption of an impact fee adopted after
June 20, 1987. The political subdivision shall assess the impact fees before or at the time of recordation
of a subdivision plat or other plat under Subchapter A, Chapter 212, or the subdivision or platting
ordinance or procedures of any political subdivision in the official records of the county clerk of the
county in which the tract is located. Except as provided by Section 395.019, if the political subdivision
has water and wastewater capacity available:
(1) the political subdivision shall collect the fees at the time the political subdivision issues a building
permit;
6
(2) for land platted outside the corporate boundaries of a municipality, the municipality shall collect the
fees at the time an application for an individual meter connection to the municipality's water or
wastewater system is filed; or
(3) a political subdivision that lacks authority to issue building permits in the area where the impact fee
applies shall collect the fees at the time an application is filed for an individual meter connection to the
political subdivision's water or wastewater system.
(e) For land on which new development occurs or is proposed to occur without platting, the political
subdivision may assess the impact fees at any time during the development and building process and
may collect the fees at either the time of recordation of the subdivision plat or connection to the political
subdivision's water or sewer system or at the time the political subdivision issues either the building
permit or the certificate of occupancy.
(f) An "assessment" means a determination of the amount of the impact fee in effect on the date or
occurrence provided in this section and is the maximum amount that can be charged per service unit of
such development. No specific act by the political subdivision is required.
(g) Notwithstanding Subsections (a)-(e) and Section 395.017, the political subdivision may reduce or
waive an impact fee for any service unit that would qualify as affordable housing under 42 U.S.C.
Section 12745, as amended, once the service unit is constructed. If affordable housing as defined by 42
U.S.C. Section 12745, as amended, is not constructed, the political subdivision may reverse its decision
to waive or reduce the impact fee, and the political subdivision may assess an impact fee at any time
during the development approval or building process or after the building process if an impact fee was
not already assessed.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg.,
ch. 980, § 52, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 4, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.017. Additional Fee Prohibited; Exception
After assessment of the impact fees attributable to the new development or execution of an agreement
for payment of impact fees, additional impact fees or increases in fees may not be assessed against the
tract for any reason unless the number of service units to be developed on the tract increases. In the
event of the increase in the number of service units, the impact fees to be imposed are limited to the
amount attributable to the additional service units.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.018. Agreement With Owner Regarding Payment
A political subdivision is authorized to enter into an agreement with the owner of a tract of land for
which the plat has been recorded providing for the time and method of payment of the impact fees.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
7
§ 395.019. Collection of Fees if Services Not Available
Except for roadway facilities, impact fees may be assessed but may not be collected in areas where
services are not currently available unless:
(1) the collection is made to pay for a capital improvement or facility expansion that has been identified
in the capital improvements plan and the political subdivision commits to commence construction within
two years, under duly awarded and executed contracts or commitments of staff time covering
substantially all of the work required to provide service, and to have the service available within a
reasonable period of time considering the type of capital improvement or facility expansion to be
constructed, but in no event longer than five years;
(2) the political subdivision agrees that the owner of a new development may construct or finance the
capital improvements or facility expansions and agrees that the costs incurred or funds advanced will be
credited against the impact fees otherwise due from the new development or agrees to reimburse the
owner for such costs from impact fees paid from other new developments that will use such capital
improvements or facility expansions, which fees shall be collected and reimbursed to the owner at the
time the other new development records its plat; or
(3) an owner voluntarily requests the political subdivision to reserve capacity to serve future
development, and the political subdivision and owner enter into a valid written agreement.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.020. Entitlement to Services
Any new development for which an impact fee has been paid is entitled to the permanent use and benefit
of the services for which the fee was exacted and is entitled to receive immediate service from any
existing facilities with actual capacity to serve the new service units, subject to compliance with other
valid regulations.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.021. Authority of Political Subdivisions to Spend Funds to Reduce Fees
Political subdivisions may spend funds from any lawful source to pay for all or a part of the capital
improvements or facility expansions to reduce the amount of impact fees.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.022. Authority of Political Subdivision to Pay Fees
Political subdivisions and other governmental entities may pay impact fees imposed under this chapter.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
8
§ 395.023. Credits Against Roadway Facilities Fees
Any construction of, contributions to, or dedications of off -site roadway facilities agreed to or required
by a political subdivision as a condition of development approval shall be credited against roadway
facilities impact fees otherwise due from the development.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.024. Accounting For Fees and Interest
(a) The order, ordinance, or resolution levying an impact fee must provide that all funds collected
through the adoption of an impact fee shall be deposited in interest -bearing accounts clearly identifying
the category of capital improvements or facility expansions within the service area for which the fee was
adopted.
(b) Interest earned on impact fees is considered funds of the account on which it is earned and is subject
to all restrictions placed on use of impact fees under this chapter.
(c) Impact fee funds may be spent only for the purposes for which the impact fee was imposed as shown
by the capital improvements plan and as authorized by this chapter.
(d) The records of the accounts into which impact fees are deposited shall be open for public inspection
and copying during ordinary business hours.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.025. Refunds
(a) On the request of an owner of the property on which an impact fee has been paid, the political
subdivision shall refund the impact fee if existing facilities are available and service is denied or the
political subdivision has, after collecting the fee when service was not available, failed to commence
construction within two years or service is not available within a reasonable period considering the type
of capital improvement or facility expansion to be constructed, but in no event later than five years from
the date of payment under Section 395.019(1).
(b) Repealed by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 9, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
(c) The political subdivision shall refund any impact fee or part of it that is not spent as authorized by
this chapter within 10 years after the date of payment.
(d) Any refund shall bear interest calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund at the
statutory rate as set forth in Section 302.002, Finance Code, or its successor statute.
(e) All refunds shall be made to the record owner of the property at the time the refund is paid. However,
if the impact fees were paid by another political subdivision or governmental entity, payment shall be
made to the political subdivision or governmental entity.
9
(f) The owner of the property on which an impact fee has been paid or another political subdivision or
governmental entity that paid the impact fee has standing to sue for a refund under this section.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg.,
ch. 1396, § 37, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, § 7.82, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 9,
eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
SUBCHAPTER C. PROCEDURES FOR ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEE
§ 395.041. Compliance With Procedures Required
Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, a political subdivision must comply with this subchapter
to levy an impact fee.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.0411. Capital Improvements Plan
The political subdivision shall provide for a capital improvements plan to be developed by qualified
professionals using generally accepted engineering and planning practices in accordance with Section
395.014.
Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.042. Hearing on Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan
To impose an impact fee, a political subdivision must adopt an order, ordinance, or resolution
establishing a public hearing date to consider the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan
for the designated service area.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.043. Information About Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan Available
to Public
On or before the date of the first publication of the notice of the hearing on the land use assumptions and
capital improvements plan, the political subdivision shall make available to the public its land use
assumptions, the time period of the projections, and a description of the capital improvement facilities
that may be proposed.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
10
§ 395.044. Notice of Hearing on Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan
(a) Before the 30th day before the date of the hearing on the land use assumptions and capital
improvements plan, the political subdivision shall send a notice of the hearing by certified mail to any
person who has given written notice by certified or registered mail to the municipal secretary or other
designated official of the political subdivision requesting notice of the hearing within two years
preceding the date of adoption of the order, ordinance, or resolution setting the public hearing.
(b) The political subdivision shall publish notice of the hearing before the 30th day before the date set
for the hearing, in one or more newspapers of general circulation in each county in which the political
subdivision lies. However, a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that
function as impact fees may publish the required newspaper notice only in each county in which the
service area lies.
(c) The notice must contain:
(1) a headline to read as follows:
"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PLAN RELATING TO POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES"
(2) the time, date, and location of the hearing;
(3) a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to consider the land use assumptions and capital
improvements plan under which an impact fee may be imposed; and
(4) a statement that any member of the public has the right to appear at the hearing and present evidence
for or against the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.045. Approval of Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan Required
(a) After the public hearing on the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan, the political
subdivision shall determine whether to adopt or reject an ordinance, order, or resolution approving the
land use assumptions and capital improvements plan.
(b) The political subdivision, within 30 days after the date of the public hearing, shall approve or
disapprove the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan.
(c) An ordinance, order, or resolution approving the land use assumptions and capital improvements
plan may not be adopted as an emergency measure.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001
11
§ 395.0455. Systemwide Land Use Assumptions
(a) In lieu of adopting land use assumptions for each service area, a political subdivision may, except for
storm water, drainage, flood control, and roadway facilities, adopt systemwide land use assumptions,
which cover all of the area subject to the jurisdiction of the political subdivision for the purpose of
imposing impact fees under this chapter.
(b) Prior to adopting systemwide land use assumptions, a political subdivision shall follow the public
notice, hearing, and other requirements for adopting land use assumptions.
(c) After adoption of systemwide land use assumptions, a political subdivision is not required to adopt
additional land use assumptions for a service area for water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities
or wastewater collection and treatment facilities as a prerequisite to the adoption of a capital
improvements plan or impact fee, provided the capital improvements plan and impact fee are consistent
with the systemwide land use assumptions.
Added by Acts 1989, 7l st Leg., ch. 566, § 1(b), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.047. Hearing on Impact Fee
On adoption of the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan, the governing body shall adopt
an order or resolution setting a public hearing to discuss the imposition of the impact fee. The public
hearing must be held by the governing body of the political subdivision to discuss the proposed
ordinance, order, or resolution imposing an impact fee.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001
§ 395.049. Notice of Hearing on Impact Fee
(a) Before the 30th day before the date of the hearing on the imposition of an impact fee, the political
subdivision shall send a notice of the hearing by certified mail to any person who has given written
notice by certified or registered mail to the municipal secretary or other designated official of the
political subdivision requesting notice of the hearing within two years preceding the date of adoption of
the order or resolution setting the public hearing.
(b) The political subdivision shall publish notice of the hearing before the 30th day before the date set
for the hearing, in one or more newspapers of general circulation in each county in which the political
subdivision lies. However, a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that
function as impact fees may publish the required newspaper notice only in each county in which the
service area lies.
(c) The notice must contain the following:
(1) a headline to read as follows:
"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES"
12
(2) the time, date, and location of the hearing;
(3) a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to consider the adoption of an impact fee;
(4) the amount of the proposed impact fee per service unit; and
(5) a statement that any member of the public has the right to appear at the hearing and present evidence
for or against the plan and proposed fee.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.050. Advisory Committee Comments on Impact Fees
The advisory committee created under Section 395.058 shall file its written comments on the proposed
impact fees before the fifth business day before the date of the public hearing on the imposition of the
fees.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.051. Approval of Impact Fee Required
(a) The political subdivision, within 30 days after the date of the public hearing on the imposition of an
impact fee, shall approve or disapprove the imposition of an impact fee.
(b) An ordinance, order, or resolution approving the imposition of an impact fee may not be adopted as
an emergency measure.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 5, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.052. Periodic Update of Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan Required
(a) A political subdivision imposing an impact fee shall update the land use assumptions and capital
improvements plan at least every five years. The initial five-year period begins on the day the capital
improvements plan is adopted.
(b) The political subdivision shall review and evaluate its current land use assumptions and shall cause
an update of the capital improvements plan to be prepared in accordance with Subchapter B.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 6, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
13
§ 395.053. Hearing on Updated Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan
The governing body of the political subdivision shall, within 60 days after the date it receives the update
of the land use assumptions and the capital improvements plan, adopt an order setting a public hearing to
discuss and review the update and shall determine whether to amend the plan.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.054. Hearing on Amendments to Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, or
Impact Fee
A public hearing must be held by the governing body of the political subdivision to discuss the proposed
ordinance, order, or resolution amending land use assumptions, the capital improvements plan, or the
impact fee. On or before the date of the first publication of the notice of the hearing on the amendments,
the land use assumptions and the capital improvements plan, including the amount of any proposed
amended impact fee per service unit, shall be made available to the public.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.055. Notice of Hearing on Amendments to Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements
Plan, or Impact Fee
(a) The notice and hearing procedures prescribed by Sections 395.044(a) and (b) apply to a hearing on
the amendment of land use assumptions, a capital improvements plan, or an impact fee.
(b) The notice of a hearing under this section must contain the following:
(1) a headline to read as follows:
"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT OF IMPACT FEES"
(2) the time, date, and location of the hearing;
(3) a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to consider the amendment of land use assumptions and
a capital improvements plan and the imposition of an impact fee; and
(4) a statement that any member of the public has the right to appear at the hearing and present evidence
for or against the update.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 7, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
14
§ 395.056. Advisory Committee Comments on Amendments
The advisory committee created under Section 395.058 shall file its written comments on the proposed
amendments to the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee before the fifth
business day before the date of the public hearing on the amendments.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.057. Approval of Amendments Required
(a) The political subdivision, within 30 days after the date of the public hearing on the amendments,
shall approve or disapprove the amendments of the land use assumptions and the capital improvements
plan and modification of an impact fee.
(b) An ordinance, order, or resolution approving the amendments to the land use assumptions, the capital
improvements plan, and imposition of an impact fee may not be adopted as an emergency measure.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.0575. Determination That No Update of Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan
or Impact Fees is Needed
(a) If, at the time an update under Section 395.052 is required, the governing body determines that no
change to the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee is needed, it may, as an
alternative to the updating requirements of Sections 395.052-395.057, do the following:
(1) The governing body of the political subdivision shall, upon determining that an update is
unnecessary and 60 days before publishing the final notice under this section, send notice of its
determination not to update the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee by
certified mail to any person who has, within two years preceding the date that the final notice of this
matter is to be published, give written notice by certified or registered mail to the municipal secretary or
other designated official of the political subdivision requesting notice of hearings related to impact fees.
The notice must contain the information in Subsections (b)(2)-(5).
(2) The political subdivision shall publish notice of its determination once a week for three consecutive
weeks in one or more newspapers with general circulation in each county in which the political
subdivision lies. However, a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that
function as impact fees may publish the required newspaper notice only in each county in which the
service area lies. The notice of public hearing may not be in the part of the paper in which legal notices
and classified ads appear and may not be smaller than one -quarter page of a standard -size or tabloid -size
newspaper, and the headline on the notice must be in 18-point or larger type.
15
(b) The notice must contain the following:
(1) a headline to read as follows:
"NOTICE OF DETERMINATION NOT TO UPDATE
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN, OR IMPACT FEES";
(2) a statement that the governing body of the political subdivision has determined that no change to the
land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee is necessary;
(3) an easily understandable description and a map of the service area in which the updating has been
determined to be unnecessary;
(4) a statement that if, within a specified date, which date shall be at least 60 days after publication of
the first notice, a person makes a written request to the designated official of the political subdivision
requesting that the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee be updated, the
governing body must comply with the request by following the requirements of Sections 395.052-
395.057; and
(5) a statement identifying the name and mailing address of the official of the political subdivision to
whom a request for an update should be sent.
(c) The advisory committee shall file its written comments on the need for updating the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plans, and impact fee before the fifth business day before the earliest
notice of the government's decision that no update is necessary is mailed or published.
(d) If, by the date specified in Subsection (b)(4), a person requests in writing that the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee be updated, the governing body shall cause an
update of the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan to be prepared in accordance with
Sections 395.052-395.057.
(e) An ordinance, order, or resolution determining the need for updating land use assumptions, a capital
improvements plan, or an impact fee may not be adopted as an emergency measure.
Added by Acts 1989, 71 st Leg., ch. 566, § 1(d), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.058. Advisory Committee
(a) On or before the date on which the order, ordinance, or resolution is adopted under Section 395.042,
the political subdivision shall appoint a capital improvements advisory committee.
(b) The advisory committee is composed of not less than five members who shall be appointed by a
majority vote of the governing body of the political subdivision. Not less than 40 percent of the
membership of the advisory committee must be representatives of the real estate, development, or
building industries who are not employees or officials of a political subdivision or governmental entity.
16
If the political subdivision has a planning and zoning commission, the commission may act as the
advisory committee if the commission includes at least one representative of the real estate,
development, or building industry who is not an employee or official of a political subdivision or
governmental entity. If no such representative is a member of the planning and zoning commission, the
commission may still act as the advisory committee if at least one such representative is appointed by
the political subdivision as an ad hoc voting member of the planning and zoning commission when it
acts as the advisory committee. If the impact fee is to be applied in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the
political subdivision, the membership must include a representative from that area.
(c) The advisory committee serves in an advisory capacity and is established to:
(1) advise and assist the political subdivision in adopting land use assumptions;
(2) review the capital improvements plan and file written comments;
(3) monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements plan;
(4) file semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to
the political subdivision any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee;
and
(5) advise the political subdivision of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, capital
improvements plan, and impact fee.
(d) The political subdivision shall make available to the advisory committee any professional reports
with respect to developing and implementing the capital improvements plan.
(e) The governing body of the political subdivision shall adopt procedural rules for the advisory
committee to follow in carrying out its duties.
Added by Acts 1989, 7lst Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
SUBCHAPTER D. OTHER PROVISIONS
§ 395.071. Duties to be Performed Within Time Limits
If the governing body of the political subdivision does not perform a duty imposed under this chapter
within the prescribed period, a person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land on which an
impact fee has been paid has the right to present a written request to the governing body of the political
subdivision stating the nature of the unperformed duty and requesting that it be performed within 60
days after the date of the request. If the governing body of the political subdivision finds that the duty is
required under this chapter and is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to commence within 60
days after the date of the request and continue until completion.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
17
§ 395.072. Records of Hearings
A record must be made of any public hearing provided for by this chapter. The record shall be
maintained and be made available for public inspection by the political subdivision for at least 10 years
after the date of the hearing.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.073. Cumulative Effect of State and Local Restrictions
Any state or local restrictions that apply to the imposition of an impact fee in a political subdivision
where an impact fee is proposed are cumulative with the restrictions in this chapter.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.074. Prior Impact Fees Replaced by Fees Under This Chapter
An impact fee that is in place on June 20, 1987, must be replaced by an impact fee made under this
chapter on or before June 20, 1990. However, any political subdivision having an impact fee that has not
been replaced under this chapter on or before June 20, 1988, is liable to any party who, after June 20,
1988, pays an impact fee that exceeds the maximum permitted under Subchapter B by more than 10
percent for an amount equal to two times the difference between the maximum impact fee allowed and
the actual impact fee imposed, plus reasonable attorney's fees and court costs.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.075. No Effect on Taxes or Other Charges
This chapter does not prohibit, affect, or regulate any tax, fee, charge, or assessment specifically
authorized by state law.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.076. Moratorium on Development Prohibited
A moratorium may not be placed on new development for the purpose of awaiting the completion of all
or any part of the process necessary to develop, adopt, or update land use assumptions, a capital
improvements plan, or an impact fee.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 441, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.077. Appeals
(a) A person who has exhausted all administrative remedies within the political subdivision and who is
aggrieved by a final decision is entitled to trial de novo under this chapter.
18
(b) A suit to contest an impact fee must be filed within 90 days after the date of adoption of the
ordinance, order, or resolution establishing the impact fee.
(c) Except for roadway facilities, a person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of property on which
an impact fee has been paid is entitled to specific performance of the services by the political
subdivision for which the fee was paid.
(d) This section does not require construction of a specific facility to provide the services.
(e) Any suit must be filed in the county in which the major part of the land area of the political
subdivision is located. A successful litigant shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and
court costs.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.078. Substantial Compliance With Notice Requirements
An impact fee may not be held invalid because the public notice requirements were not complied with if
compliance was substantial and in good faith.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.079. Impact Fee for Storm Water, Drainage, and Flood Control in Populous County
(a) Any county that has a population of 3.3 million or more or that borders a county with a population of
3.3 million or more, and any district or authority created under Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas
Constitution within any such county that is authorized to provide storm water, drainage, and flood
control facilities, is authorized to impose impact fees to provide storm water, drainage, and flood control
improvements necessary to accommodate new development.
(b) The imposition of impact fees authorized by Subsection (a) is exempt from the requirements of
Sections 395.025, 395.052-395.057, and 395.074 unless the political subdivision proposes to increase
the impact fee.
(c) Any political subdivision described by Subsection (a) is authorized to pledge or otherwise
contractually obligate all or part of the impact fees to the payment of principal and interest on bonds,
notes, or other obligations issued or incurred by or on behalf of the political subdivision and to the
payment of any other contractual obligations.
(d) An impact fee adopted by a political subdivision under Subsection (a) may not be reduced if:
(1) the political subdivision has pledged or otherwise contractually obligated all or part of the impact
fees to the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by or on behalf
of the political subdivision; and
(2) the political subdivision agrees in the pledge or contract not to reduce the impact fees during the term
of the bonds, notes, or other contractual obligations.
19
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 669, § 107, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
§ 395.080. Chapter Not Applicable to Certain Water -Related Special Districts
(a) This chapter does not apply to impact fees, charges, fees, assessments, or contributions:
(1) paid by or charged to a district created under Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution to
another district created under that constitutional provision if both districts are required by law to obtain
approval of their bonds by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission; or
(2) charged by an entity if the impact fees, charges, fees, assessments, or contributions are approved by
the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission.
(b) Any district created under Article XVI, Section 59, or Article III, Section 52, of the Texas
Constitution may petition the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission for approval of any
proposed impact fees, charges, fees, assessments, or contributions. The commission shall adopt rules for
reviewing the petition and may charge the petitioner fees adequate to cover the cost of processing and
considering the petition. The rules shall require notice substantially the same as that required by this
chapter for the adoption of impact fees and shall afford opportunity for all affected parties to participate.
Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg.,
ch. 76, § 11.257, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
§ 395.081. Fees for Adjoining Landowners in Certain Municipalities
(a) This section applies only to a municipality with a population of 105,000 or less that constitutes more
than three -fourths of the population of the county in which the majority of the area of the municipality is
located.
(b) A municipality that has not adopted an impact fee under this chapter that is constructing a capital
improvement, including sewer or waterline or drainage or roadway facilities, from the municipality to a
development located within or outside the municipality's boundaries, in its discretion, may allow a
landowner whose land adjoins the capital improvement or is within a specified distance from the capital
improvement, as determined by the governing body of the municipality, to connect to the capital
improvement if:
(1) the governing body of the municipality has adopted a finding under Subsection (c); and
(2) the landowner agrees to pay a proportional share of the cost of the capital improvement as
determined by the governing body of the municipality and agreed to by the landowner.
(c) Before a municipality may allow a landowner to connect to a capital improvement under Subsection
(b), the municipality shall adopt a finding that the municipality will benefit from allowing the landowner
to connect to the capital improvement. The finding shall describe the benefit to be received by the
municipality.
20
(d) A determination of the governing body of a municipality, or its officers or employees, under this
section is a discretionary function of the municipality and the municipality and its officers or employees
are not liable for a determination made under this section.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1150, § 1, eff. June 19, 1997.
§ 395.082. Certification of Compliance Required
(a) A political subdivision that imposes an impact fee shall submit a written certification verifying
compliance with this chapter to the attorney general each year not later than the last day of the political
subdivision's fiscal year.
(b) The certification must be signed by the presiding officer of the governing body of a political
subdivision and include a statement that reads substantially similar to the following: "This statement
certifies compliance with Chapter 395, Local Government Code."
(c) A political subdivision that fails to submit a certification as required by this section is liable to the
state for a civil penalty in an amount equal to 10 percent of the amount of the impact fees erroneously
charged. The attorney general shall collect the civil penalty and deposit the amount collected to the
credit of the housing trust fund.
Added by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 345, § 8, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
21
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report rill NICHOLS
City of Pearland
APPENDIX B:
City of Pearland 2012 Market Study Update
B-1
Table 1
Population Trends
Pearland and Selected Areas
1970-2030
Census
End of Year Estimates and Projections
Area
Houston -
Sugar
Land-
Baytown
M.S.A*
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2,169,100
2,735,766
3,322,025
4,715,407
5,966,839
6,765,666
7,675,842
8,707,403
9,870,332
Brazoria
County
108,300
169,588
191,707
241,767
287,681
311,763
335,893
359,900
383,526
% of
Houston -
Sugar
Land -
Baytown
M.S.A.
5.00%
6.20%
5.80%
5.10%
4.82%
4.61%
4.38%
4.13%
3.89%
City of
Pearland
W/O SCR
6,400
13,200
18,697
37,640
70,551
74,449
90,014
105,514
121,014
City of
Pearland
W/SCR
6,400
13,200
18,697
37,640
91,252
109,400
124,965
140,465
155,965
% of
Brazoria
County
5.90%
7.80%
9.80%
15.60%
31.72%
35.09%
37.20%
39.03%
40.67%
10 County Metropolitan Statistical Area includes:
Austin, Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery,
San Jacinto, Waller.
Sources: Texas State Data Center 2008 Population and Projections for Counties, and U.S. Census of
Population and Housing 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000.
Table 2
Pearland-Selected Demographics
2000-2010
Characteristic
Pearland 2000
Pearland 2010
Change
Age
Number
Percentage
Number
Percentage
# Change
% Increase
Decrease or
Under 5
2,996
8.0%
8,287
9.1%
5,291
1.1%
5 to 9
3,035
8.1%
7,715
8.5%
4,680
0.4%
10 to 14
2,996
8.0%
7,070
7.7%
4,074
-0.2%
15 to 19
2823
7.5%
5,761
6.3%
2,938
-1.2%
20 to 24
1,767
4.7%
4,359
4.8%
2,592
0.1%
25 to 34
5,681
15.1%
13,945
15.3%
8,264
0.2%
35 to 44
7,205
19.1%
15,775
17.3%
8,570
-1.9%
45 to 54
5,164
13.7%
12,763
14.0%
7,599
0.3%
55 to 59
1,626
4.3%
4,839
5.3%
3,213
1.0%
60 to 64
1,188
3.2%
3,701
4.1%
2,513
0.9%
65 to 74
1,893
5.0%
4,225
4.6%
2,332
-0.4%
75 to 84
987
2.6%
2,098
2.3%
1,111
-0.3%
85+
279
0.7%
714
0.8%
435
0.0%
Total
37,640
91,252
53,612
Average Age
34.2
34.1
-
-
Education
Number
Percentage
Number
Percentage
# Change
%Increase or
Decrease
Less than 12th grade
(no diploma)
2,938
12.1%
4,322
7.8%
1,384
4.2/°
High School Graduate
(includes equivalency)
5,537
22.7%
8,947
16.2%
3,410
-6.5%
Some College
(no degree)11,670
7,081
29.1%
21.1%
4,589
7.9/
Associates Degree
1,710
7.0%
4,471
8.1%
2,761
1.1%
Bachelor Degree
5,337
21.9%
15,470
28.0%
10,133
6.1%
Graduate Degree
1,751
7.2%
10,328
18.7%
8,577
11.5%
Percent Bachelors or
Higher
-
29.1%
46.7%
17.6%
Household
Income
Number
Percentage
Number
Percentage
# Change
% Increase or
Decrease
Less than $10,000
252
2.3%
847
3.6%
595
1.2%
$10,000 - $14,999
158
1.5%
448
1.9%
290
0.4%
$15,000 - $24,999
717
6.6%
805
3.4%
88
-3.2%
$25,000 - $34,999
663
6.1%
995
4.2%
332
-1.9%
$35,000 - $49,999
1,510
13.9%
1,721
7.3%
211
-6.7%
$50,000 - $74,999
2,476
22.8%
3,756
15.8%
1280
-7.0%
$75,000 - $99,999
2,242
20.7%
3,644
15.4%
1402
-5.3%
$100,000 - $149,999
2059
19.0%
6101
25.7%
4042
6.7%
$150,000 - $199,999
509
4.7%
2926
12.3%
2417
7.6%
$200,000 or more
252
2.3%
2481
10.5%
2229
8.1%
Total
10,838
-
23,724
-
12,886
-
Median Household
$70,748
-
$97,392
-
$26,644
-
Per Capita Income
$26,306
-
$34,205
-
$7,899
-
Source: 2000 U.S. Census Summary File 3, Selected Economic and Social Char. and 2010 American
Community Survey, Selected Economic and Social Char.
9
Table 3
Pearland Projected School Enrollment 1990-2020
Pearland ISD - Enrollment and Projections
Year
Enrollment
Projected School
1990
6,440
Actual School Enrollment
2000
10,185
2002
11,800
2006
15,434
2010
18,726
2015
20,918
Projected School Enrollment
2019
22,417
2020
22,806*
Sources: Pearland ISD Population and Survey Analysts — Demographics and Mini Update —June
2010, 2007 City of Pearland Market Study.
* 2020 Population estimated from the Series I Projection from the Pearland ISD Study based on averaged growth from 2014-
2019.
10
Table 4
Employment Statistics
City of Pearland and Brazoria County
1990-2010
City of Pearland Employment: 1990-2010
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Labor Force
11,084
11,835
12,010
29,600
49,460
Employment
10,772
11,297
11,556
28,385
46,387
Unemployment
312
538
454
1,215
3,073
Unemployment Rate
2.8%
4.5%
3.8%
4.1%
4.8%
Brazoria County Employment: 1990-2010
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Labor Force
98,079
105,798
106,312
135,442
155,319
Employment
93,554
97,945
99,685
127,709
143,049
Unemployment
4,527
7,853
6,627
7,733
11,863
Unemployment Rate
4.6%
7.4%
6.2%
5.7%
5.0%
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Texas Workforce Commission, CDS Market Research and the
2010 U.S. Census American Community Survey, 1-Year Estimates, Selected Economic
Characteristics.
S2
C
E
0
CQ
C
2000 to 2010
City of Pearland Employment By Industry: 2000 to 2010
Employment
0
O
N
2.00%
0
O
Cr
Is:
0
0
L 1
r1
0
0
s'
Ln
0
0
l0
o1
0
0
c-I
CD
0
0
CD
N
0
0
LD
I�
0
0
L--I
O
(--1
0
0
u1
o1
(--1
0
0
01
4
0
0
L11
4
0
0
N
L(1
Change
0
0
p
0
0
cci
n
0
0
lD
0
0
c-I
-0.30%
0
0
O
0.00%
0
0
M
.g
0
p
i ry
0*
0
.--1
O
(.1O
co
-2.00%
0
r-1
O
0
O
Ll1
N
0
O
N
0
O
m
W
4.10%
0
O
m
cur
0
O
00
0
O
LD
0
O
m
4
0
1n
rm-I
cr'0
Ql
Om
0
O
%-4
0
O
I�
m
O
t\
m
0
O
CO
m
m
Tr
r-i
2,830
1,042
L
CO
e-i
rn
r-I
(-I
506
00
r-i
N
Cr)
c-i
0
00
M.
LD
Cr)r-1
876
In
,--1
LD
Cr)N
r
# Employed
# Change
801
L!1
0
Le')
00
O
a -I
847
I-IO�
LLo
r
N
1,500
I�
N
lD
514
m
c
0
Lfl
Ln
O
N
m
N
823
602
c-I
N
01
LD
N
O
N
N
CO
r-I
1,940
01
COm
m
01
00
00
,
4,330
L--I
CT)
LD
N
m
CO
(4
N
0
N
m
00
1.6
(-1
Ln
m
7..1
Cr)
CO
M
0 1
LD
.--i
Lf1
I�
(-I
46,387
M
y
3
C
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining
Construction
`Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Transportation and warehousing, and utilities
Information _
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing
Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative
and waste management services
Educational services, and health care and social assistance
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and
food services
Other services, except public administration
Public administration
Total Employment
Brazoria County Employment By Industry: 2000 to 2010
% Employment
O
N
o
N
NN-
O
u?
O
O
c•MIn
o
'O.
CD
M
c-
o
C.
(0
0
O
CO
1-
0
00
in
8.10%
0
O
x-
0
O
lC)
%OL'.V
5.30%
Change
cyz
O
O
o
CT
—i
o
O
Cr
LIl
0.00%
\
00
O
O
\
O
o
N
O
o
E
O
c
COD
N
\
O
LO
o
O
O
-0.40 %
00
Oi
O
r"I
O
N
o
0
Cr)
N
o
0
CO
W
a
0
CO
N
o
0
N'
M
0
0
co
6
0
0
co
6
0
0
CO
0
0
N-
4
0
C)O
~
O6
24.30%
0
CO
Ln
0
O
Cr)
V
0
O
LC)
4
'a
O.
W
im
p
N
c
N
12,264
O
`-
_
3,644
10,957
d'
0
Cfl
�_
O)
�-
N
CCOO
Ln
COLO
CO
CO-
19,341
CO
4,963
C)
CMO
Ln
N
LID
LO
O
ci
r
U
:X
Cmm
1,494
co
mmi
.-i
00
00
N
c-i
3,786
2,223
394
1,081
LO
O
!-
LD
15,394
00
N
N
(V
0
N
c-1
738
36,387
O
O
f'1
3,314
CO
18,032
rn
d'
14,743
8,227
2,308
6,733
M
34,735
co
co
Cr)
T
CO
6,371
143,049
N
7
13
C
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Transportation and warehousing, and utilities
Information
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing
Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative
and waste management services
IEducational services, and health care and social assistance
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and
food services
Other services, except public administration _ 1
Public administration
Total Employment
Table 6
Pearland Major Private Employers 2012
Company Name
Local Employees
Kemion Products
358
Davis Lynch
275
Bredero Shaw
150
TurboCare
150
Profax
135
Texas Honing, Inc.
132
Packaging Service Co., Inc.
130
Aggreko
125
Allied Fire Protection
95
Third Coast Terminals
91
CPI Group, Inc.
85
Amerlux Exterior
65
Baker Hughes
63
Weatherford
55
Gate Precast Company
50
Traffic Control Devices, Inc.
50
Solvchem
196
13
Table 7
Residential Construction Permits Issued
1990-2011
(Entire City)
Year
Single Family Units
Multi -family Units*
Total Units
1990
403
2
405
1991
381
4
385
1992
402
160
562
1993
481
0
481
1994
362
0
362
1995
340
0
340
1996
479
2
481
1997
415
79
494
1998
516
245
761
1999
536
496
1,032
Subtotal 1990-1999
4,315
988
5,303
2000
818
0
818
2001
1,243
0
1,243
2002
1,430
0
1,430
2003
1,684
12
1,696
2004
2,102
0
2,102
2005
2,610
0
2,610
2006
2,072
286
2,358
2007
1585
21
1606
2008
1240
2
1242
2009
776
53
829
2010
723
4
727
Subtotal 2000-2010
16,283
378
16,661
2011
691
30
721
Total
21,289
1,396
22,685
* Includes duplexes and apartments.
Sources: City of Pearland, Permit Division, and CDS Market Research
14
Table 8
Pearland Surveyed Apartments
(Entire City)
Year Built/
Renovated
Name
Units
Occupancy
Average
Rent/Unit
Average
Rent/
Sq. Ft.
Average
Sq.Ft./
Unit
1983
Strawbridge
tRoyal
171
98.0%
$674
$0.88
802
1972
Oaks
Apts
298
96.0%
$623
$0.84
813
1972/1992
Salem
Village Apts
141
100.0%
$644
$0.75
934
1976/1994
Silver Maple
Apts
152
99.0%
$640
$0.74
909
1979/1989
Pearland
Village Apts
130
100.0%
$561
$0.81
701
1970
Park Place
Apts
99
97.0%
$597
$0.77
802
1985
Whispering
Winds Apts
286
95.0%
$770
$0.86
923
1993
Remington
ts
352
97.0%
$849
$0.91
975
1999
Enclave at
Mary's
Creek
240
93.0%
$850
$0.93
959
2000
WAptske
256
96.0%
$856
$0.84
1,021
2003
Oakbridge Apts
158
99.4%
$700
$1.00
696
2005
Waterford
Place Apts
296
94%
$829
$1.20
691
2006
Villas at
Shadow
Creek Ranch
264
--
--
--
--
Total/Average
2,843
97%
$716
$0.87
852
-- Could not obtain information
Sources: City of Pearland, Permits Division, and CDS Market Research
15
Table 9
Commercial Construction Permits Issued
(Entire City)
Year
Value of
Construction *
Number of
Buildings **
Average Building
Value
1990
$1,197,840
8
$149,730
1991
$2,501,000
11
$277,364
1992
$6,849,000
16
$428,063
1993
$6,475,570
15
$431,705
1994
$2,997,021
12
$249,752
1995
$3,762,900
13
$289,454
1996
$5,189,850
19
$273,150
1997
$10,785,050
30
$359,502
1998
$12,696,415
23
$552,018
1999
$127,661,680
22
$5,802,804
Subtotal 1990-1999
$180,116,326
169
$1,065,777
2000
$49,776,147
17
$2,928,009
2001
$10,773,000
20
$538,650
2002
$32,924,097
28
$1,175,861
2003
$41,504,192
49
$847,024
2004
$39,220,592
43
$912,107
2005
$40,675,200
51
$797,553
2006
$173,299,982
66
$2,625,757
2007
$264,425,944
77
$3,434,103
2008
$100,205,092
52
$1,927,021
2009
$95,164,827
78
$1,220,061
2010
$24,585,663
40
$614,641
Subtotal 2000-2010
$872,554,736
521
$17,020,788
2011
$23,492,992
42
$559,356
Total
$1,076,164,054
732
$1,199,713
Notes
* Not adjusted for inflation
Includes industrial, office and retail buildings.
**
Sources: City of Pearland, Permits Division and CDS Market Research
0
1-
t4
a,
* 12/2026 Total
33,134
CO
tyj
36,918
Q
z
4,500
400
O
vs
CO
co
,--I'
d'
N
o To
N FO-
*
28,812
3,440
N
N
N
m
V/N
Nin
370
50
N
Ol
t.
m
* 12/2016 Total
25,054
N
cA
co
Q
Z
O�
in
N
360
50
31,141
12/2011 Total
lD
00
N
,4,
N
2,843
24,629
Q
Z
in
,-1
343
o
26,547
a
0
20,627
Lc.)Z
(-J
23,152
LC0
0
23,753
Dec-00
00
in
c
<-1
^
O
N
12,485
Q
Z
toO
U
O
<-1
0
m
0)
Q
H
Single Family
I Multi -Family
Total Residential
Industrial **
Commercial
Assisted Living (beds)
Hospital (beds)
Grand Total
from 2006 — 2011.
•
'U
a
C
E
O
U
O
.O
a
to
a
a
a)
t6
a
E c
0
C @
a
4 - a)
cC
O Y
a L
a) to
a+ Cr)
� 0
O U
CO
CO O_
,n >
7 Q
C typ
L.-
C
O C
L @
O tl
OA
a C
to @
v L
a (a
4--, a
co o_
@ O
f2.
a >^
to U
a
> O
to (0
t
L
O CO
a
O O
ate+
U
_ O
+7-, O
-O •>
C
to
to
a,
d
4-
O H
>, a
+-, U
U L
* 0
* t/)
Pearland Land Use Figures
2000-2006
V1
C1A
c
X
LLS
Total
Acreage
m
lD
Cr)
Lfl
rn
LO
c-1
lD
N
c-i
l0
u-
M
1,
ci
m
c-i
l0
N
10,474
2006
New Acreage
N.
01
d'
c-1
28
1,525
545
in
c-i
O
N
4,085
U nits/Acre
N
m
lD
`-1
Q
Z
0.42
01
m
dO
Q
Z
New Units
a-i
01
i,
440
r-1
M
N
229
268
5,728
N
7
to
c
a)
U
O
O
O
N
Total Acreage
lD
In
m
c-1
0
O
01
598
6,389
Units/Acre
111
N
ST
Q
Z
0.42
m
0
Q
Z
Unit
Ln
-1
e-1
2,027
1
rri
500
80
13,772
a,
Q
H
Single Family
Multi -Family
Subtotal
Commercial*
*
*
co
0
c
Total
Total Acreage
0
Li
R
183
M
N
I.:,
CI
Cr
d`
al
tD
eI
N
% -1
i�-i
0
N
New
N
lD
LA
r-i
20
N
co
Lf)
c-I
cN-I
Ln
al
LD
c-1
Units/Acre
cNvj
Q
z
m
Li
N
cr
O
Q
Z
New Units
0
N
CO
M
00
N
5,414
a)
iz
H
Single Family
Multi -Family
Subtotal
Commercial* (includes
industrial)
Total
0
U
«
c t $
E \
/ k U
CL) CO
b " k
M ¥ Q q
c 7 o
o_ N
« f m a
x Eco
> 0
› u u /
Q \ / . E
o 4- a) t u o
On § CU
0
E = u /' co
«
~ m Ch o -0 2 §
ni ¥ R a) / 2
% 0 <
o o ° M
/ / / / Crl
W c t x u
co� c C CI uk E
:kco/o2
CO Q . ..■i
/E E -
k E 2 / o C
o E
\ k ' ( = §
2 E 0 co
o_a= co'
2 - 1 \ C
E= u u CC= CO
§
. CD \ / d .E -0 §
m ~ 0 $ § a_
7.5 -0 o
E p o . �
cE 45 O/'a.) co E o.5-oSu/ co E
0
0
(ri co
/ / � 0 I_ co §
«CL ° .
a 2 E/ EIA
[ (13 j
> 0 2 7 6 -0
/' �� k
o q k CL b
~ \ b L.
4-
17) 2 « « >-
in Ln in ®
(Ni ¥ (NiO
§
e
=
0
* * VI
Ir
Acreage based on:
Pearland Land Use Projections
2006-2026
U
b.0
c
u
LLI
2026
(O
O
In
N
N
r-I
243
00
LD
N
r-I
0
O
`�
tO
in
CO'
,--I
New Acres
In
to
Ln
.-1
N
N
I",
CO
Ln
.--1
546
1
CO
CO
r-I
N
`�
N
O
N
(0
F-
t00
LID
O�
r- I
N
CO00
00
Ov-i
O
x--I
to
Ln
i
16,442
New Acres
In
to
LC)
ri
20
Ln
co
LO
r-I
546
i
t-I
m
.-1
N
2016
CO
H8
it)
01
O
Ol
r,.i
O
N
to
to
01
N
0l
O
L1
'--I
O
L)i
t--1
r
CO
f
r-I
New
Acres
Ln
to
Lf1
a-1
co
r-I
m
co
LC)
T4
to
In
1
2,129
ro
O
F
O
Ln
I�
183
m
i 1
I.
N
01
to
cr
�'
i
N
00M
.1
N
r-I
0
N
New Acres
Is,
LID
14
20
N
00
e-i
ri
N
c-i
i
00
0
r_
LID
O
O
N
Acreage
CO
tO
01
Ln
4.0
1-1
t0
N
r-1
to
ui
m
h
r-1
CO
%1
to
N
10,474
0)
0.
1—Ho
Single Family
Multi -Family
Subtotal I
Commercial*
Industrial**
(O
a-+
0)
E
•
0
ro
00
C
0
V)
(j)
0
CO
O1
tT
m
4-,
N
(O
0
61-
L)
U
(0
45
0.
N
C
N
N
4-4
C�0
.Q
0
O
0
(Li
0
(O
a)
N
a--+
E
CO
L.L
0)
00
v1
N
m
C
O
-o
a)
In
(0
m
0
0
L
Q
(O
L
4-,
-C
b.0
•
0)
C
(n
CO
O
N
co
c-I
ro
0)
1-
E
O
0)
I1
O
t
a)
rroo
4-4
vi
0)
C
0)
0
a)
a)
C
O aj
0 U
O
C
i) C
O
(0 0 (O
Q) (0 (1)
Q .V cc
L
cu
� � O
O U
0 C
LL >? q0
- � L
2 co
tD CO
rl N
a)
E
E
O
U
**Industrial combined with commercial in 2011.
Sources: City of Pearland Planning Division and CDS Market Research
Dec-26
N—I
O
CO'
N
N
M
12723
748
0
270
250
Dec-21
.-1
to
01
o0
N
N
N
M
12723
748
O
255
250
i�-I
cJ
cu 0
N
oo
00
c-I
m
N
11255
748
O
240
250
Dec-11
N
M
Q1
Lff
'--I
CD
,--1
00
u-
h
cn
N
M
O
226
O
O
cJ
aJ
0
3,000
300
3300
O,—i
O
O
O
Dec-00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Single Family
Multi -Family
Subtotal
Commercial J
Industrial
Assisted Living (beds)
Hospital (beds)
Estimates based on average annual increase from 2006 — 2011, while assuming Shadow Creek Ranch Build out by 2016.
OD
C
co
co
ro
aJ
d
4-
O
U
0
co
..0
U
to
cc
v
aJ
L
U
0
CO ++
.s✓ C
to aJ
E
aJ �
L
Q
Shadow Creek Ranch Land Use
Estimates and Projections
CD �,
N L
O v
N co
Ln
r-i
m
N
156
2,471
521
0
O
N
0
1.11
3,062
p U
N c.
m
N
LOfl
`�
-
nj
N
L l
O
O
O
3,062
0 u
N =p
m
(Ni
1�f1
r-1
2,471
N
Lfl
0
O
O
3,062
%--1 N
t--I L
N ;°
00
CO
N
156
2,344
260
p
d-
Lf1
N
up —0
p0 u'Do
N cp
Ol
r,
LnN
Ql
O
O
00
CT
Ln a
o
(L�
N v
641
O
641
c�-1
O
O
Up
co
o o
u
N `p
t\
al
N
O
n
01
N
L.r,O
O
312
m
O u
O N c0
O�
.-I
O
�O
c-I
12
O
O
cV
r-I
I Single Family
Multi -Family
Subtotal
Commercial
Industrial
Assisted Living
Hospital
Grand Total
Note: Parks and other public use acreages are not accounted for.
0
0
a
..Q
0J
N
CU
00
co
aJ
U
(0
0)
((0
C
LL)
0)
L
U
co
0)
E
(0
E
LD
r1
0)
(0
co
N
4-
Y
D
E
(0
LL
0)
00
N
N
m
2.4 acres per commercial connection, dropping to 1.6 acres past 2012. 7.5 acres per industrial connection.
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP rai.NICHOLS
FREESE
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
May 2013
Construction Project Number 1 19
Project Description
State Highway 35 12" Water Line
Detailed Description
Approximately 8,000 feet of 12-inch water line on State Highway 35 extending from dixie Farm Road to the South.
This water line will provide water for future developoments south of Dixie Farm Road.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
7,900
LF
$80
632,000
2
Fire Hydrant
16
EA
$3,200
51,200
3
6" Gate Valve with Box
16
EA
$900
14,400
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
4
EA
$2,000
8,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$35,000
35,000
6
Trench Safety
7,900
LF
$2
15,800
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
12
TN
$4,500
54,000
8
12" WL Creek Crossing
100
LF
$140
14,000
SUBTOTAL: $824,400
ENG/SURVEY 15% $123,700
SUBTOTAL: $948,100
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $90,100
SUBTOTAL: $1,036,200
CONTINGENCY 25% $259,600
SUBTOTAL: $1,297,800
PROJECT TOTAL $1,297,800
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
FREESE
rI• NICHOLS
May 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
20
Hughes Ranch & Stone Road 12" Water Line
Detailed Description
Approximately 7,400 feet of 12-inch water line along Stone Road from Brookside Road to Hughes Ranch Road and
Hughes Ranch Road from Stone Road to Cullen Blvd.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
7,300
LF
$80
584,000
2
12" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$300
30,000
3
Fire Hydrant
15
EA
$3,200
48,000
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
6
EA
$2,000
12,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
15
EA
$900
13,500
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
7
Trench Safety
7,300
LF
$2
14,600
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
16
TN
$4,500
72,000
SUBTOTAL: $804,100
ENG/SURVEY 15% $120,700
SUBTOTAL: $924,800
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $87,900
SUBTOTAL: $1, 012,700
CONTINGENCY 25% $253,200
SUBTOTAL: $1,265,900
PROJECT TOTAL $1,265,900
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
9 NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST ltIa2013
Construction Project Number
21
Project Description
Broadway (FM 518) Transmission Line
Detailed Description
Approximately 14,000 feet of 16-inch water line extending from Harkey Road to Texas.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL &Appurtenances
14,000
LF
$105
1,470,000
2
Fire Hydrant
28
EA
$3,200
89,600
3
16" Gate Valve with Box
7
EA
$10,000
70,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
28
EA
$900
25,200
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$35,000
35,000
6
Trench Safety
14,000
LF
$2
28,000
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
17
TN
$4,500
76,500
SUBTOTAL: $1, 794, 300
ENG/SURVEY 15% $269,200
SUBTOTAL: $2, 063, 500
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $196,100
SUBTOTAL: $2, 259, 600
CONTINGENCY 25% $564,900
SUBTOTAL: $2,824,500
PROJECT TOTAL $2,824,500
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIF FI1
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
FREESE
<NICHOLS
MAN' iv 2013
Construction Project Number
22
Project Description
Far East Water Plant, Elevated Storage & 12" Water Lines
Detailed Description
A new water plant with a water well, 1 million gallon ground storage and 1 million gallon elevated storage tanks,
booster pumps, electrical, and piping, etc.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
Water Well
1
LS
$1,500,000
1,500,000
2
1 Million Gallon GST
1
LS
$1,000,000
1,000,000
3
1 Million Gallon EST
1
LS
$1,800,000
1,800,000
4
Booster Pumps, Electrical & Piping
1
LS
$2,000,000
2,000,000
5
16" WL & Appurtenances
1,000
LF
$105
105,000
6
12" WL & Appurtenances
11,600
LF
$80
928,000
7
16" Gate Valve with Box
3
EA
$10,000
30,000
8
12" Gate Valve with Box
10
EA
$2,000
20,000
9
6" Gate Valve with Box
23
EA
$900
20,700
10
Fire Hydrant
23
EA
$3,200
73,600
11
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$60,000
60,000
12
Trench Safety
12,600
LF
$2
25,200
13
Ductile Iron Fittings
30
EA
$4,500
135,000
SUBTOTAL: $7, 697, 500
ENG/SURVEY 15% $1,154,700
SUBTOTAL: $8, 852, 200
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $841,000
SUBTOTAL: $9, 693, 200
CONTINGENCY 25% $2,423,300
SUBTOTAL: $12,116,500
PROJECT TOTAL $12,116,500
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBAI3LE COST
FREESE
is<NICHOLS
May 2013
Construction Project Number1
23
Project Description
Alice Water Plant Expansion
Detailed Description
A new 5 million gallon ground storage tank with additional 2 new booster pumps, controls, and piping.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
1
5 Million Gallon GST
1
LS
$1,800,000
1,800,000
2
Additional 2 Booster Pumps
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
3
Yard Piping
1
LS
$75,000
75,000
4
Electrical Controls
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
5
Site Work
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
SUBTOTAL:
$2,075,000
ENG/SURVEY
15%
$311,300
SUBTOTAL:
$2,386,300
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5%
$226,700
SUBTOTAL:
$2, 613,000
CONTINGENCY
25%
$653,300
SUBTOTAL:
$3,266,300
PROJECT TOTAL
$3,266,300
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
NM FREESE
MI 9• NICHOLS
INIay 2013
Construction Project Number 1 24
Project Description
Roy Road 12" Water Line
Detailed Description
Approximately 8,500 feet of 12-inch water line along roy Road from FM 518 to Brookside road. This line will provide
water for areas along Roy Road.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
8,100
LF
$80
648,000
2
12" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$300
30,000
3
Fire Hydrant
17
EA
$3,200
54,400
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
4
EA
$2,000
8,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
17
EA
$900
15,300
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
7
Trench Safety
8,100
LF
$2
16,200
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
15
EA
$4,500
67,500
9
12" WL Creek Crossing
300
LF
$140
42,000
SUBTOTAL: $911,400
ENG/SURVEY 15% $136,800
SUBTOTAL: $1,048,200
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $99,600
SUBTOTAL: $1,147, 800
CONTINGENCY 25% $287,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,434,800
PROJECT TOTAL $1,434,800
OPINION
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP •9 NICHOLS
OF PROBABLE COST M'Iav 2013
Construction Project Number
25
Project Description
FM 521 & Riley Road Water Lines
Detailed Description
Approximately 13,500 feet of 12-inch water line along Riley Road from Kirby Drive to Almeda road (FM 521) and
Almeda Road (FM 521) from Riley road to the Shadow Creek Ranch connection.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
13,400
LF
$80
1,072,000
2
12" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$300
30,000
3
Fire Hydrant
27
EA
$3,200
86,400
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
27
EA
$900
24,300
5
12" Gate Valve with Box
9
EA
$2,000
18,000
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$56,000
56,000
7
Trench Safety
13,400
LF
$2
26,800
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
20
TN
$4,500
90,000
SUBTOTAL: $1, 403, 500
ENG/SURVEY 15% $210,600
SUBTOTAL: $1,614,100
CONSTRUCTION MGM7 9.5% $153,400
SUBTOTAL: $1, 767, 500
CONTINGENCY 25% $441,900'
SUBTOTAL: $2,209,400
PROJECT TOTAL $2,209,400
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP ii
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
FREESE
aNICHOLS
May 2013
Construction Project Number1 26
Project Description
CR 129 & CR 127 Water Lines
Detailed Description
Approximately 11,600 feet of 12-inch water line along CR 127 from CR 130 to CR 129 and CR 129 from CR 127 to
State Highway.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
11,200
LF
$80
896,000
2
12" Boring and Casing
200
LF
$300
60,000
3
Fire Hydrant
24
EA
$3,200
76,800
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
8
EA
$2,000
16,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
24
EA
$900
21,600
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$48,000
48,000
7
Trench Safety
11,200
LF
$2
22,400
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
20
TN
$4,500
90,000
9
12" WL Creek Crossing
200
LF
$140
28,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,258,800
ENG/SURVEY 15% $188,900
SUBTOTAL: $1,447,700
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $137,600
SUBTOTAL: $1, 585, 300
CONTINGENCY 25% $396,400
SUBTOTAL: $1,981,700
PROJECT
TOTAL $1,981,700
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
IFIII9 <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Nla2013
Construction Project Number
27
Project Description
Hastings Cannon road (CR 128) Water Line
Detailed Description
Approximately 13,100 feet of 12-inch water line extending from State Highway 35 to Pearland Sites Road (CR 143)
along Hastings Cannon Road (CR 128).
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
12,700
LF
$80
1,016,000
2
12" Boring and Casing
200
LF
$300
60,000
3
Fire Hydrant
27
EA
$3,200
86,400
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
8
EA
$2,000
16,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
27
EA
$900
24,300
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
7
Trench Safety
12,700
LF
$2
25,400
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
20
TN
$4,500
90,000
9
12" WL Creek Crossing
200
LF
$140
28,000
SUBTOTAL: $1, 376,100
ENG/SURVEY 15% $206,500
SUBTOTAL: $1, 582, 600
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $150,400
SUBTOTAL: $1,733,000
CONTINGENCY 25% $433,300
SUBTOTAL: $2,166,300
PROJECT TOTAL $2,166,300
OPINION
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
r1
FREESE
<NICHOLS
OF PROBABLE COST
Nlay 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
1 28
Hastings Field Road Water Transmission Line
Detailed Description
Appriximately 10,200 feet of 16-inch water transmission line along Hastings Field Road from State highway 35 to
Pearland Sites Road (CR 143).
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
10,000
LF
$105
1,050,000
2
16" Boring and Casing
200
LF
$350
70,000
3
Fire Hydrant
21
EA
$3,200
67,200
4
16" Gate Valve with Box
7
EA
$10,000
70,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
21
EA
$900
18,900
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$42,000
42,000
7
Trench Safety
10,000
LF
$2
20,000
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
22
TN
$4,500
99,000
SUBTOTAL:
$1,437,100
ENG/SURVEY
15% $215,600
SUBTOTAL:
$1, 652,700
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5% $157,100
SUBTOTAL:
$1,809,80D
CONTINGENCY
25% $452,500
SUBTOTAL:
$2,262,300
PROJECT TOTAL
$2,262,300
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROI3AI3LE COST
MEM
•1•
FREESE
NICHOLS
Nlav 2013
Construction Project Number
29
Project Description
CR 59 & CR 564 Water Transmission Lines
Detailed Description
Approximately 5,400 feet of 16-inch and 8,200 feet of 12-inich water line along CR 59 from CR 48 to Wood Street. In
addition, a 12-inch line, approximately 5.400 feet long, will extend from CR 564 B to CR 59 along CR 564.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
5,300
LF
$105
556,500
2
12" WL & Appurtenances
8,000
LF
$80
640,000
3
16" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$350
35,000
4
12" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$300
30,000
5
Fire Hydrant
28
EA
$3,200
89,600
6
6" Gate Valve with Box
28
EA
$900
25,200
7
12" Gate Valve with Box
7
EA
$2,000
14,000
8
16" Gate Valve with Box
5
EA
$10,000
50,000
9
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$57,000
57,000
10
Trench Safety
13,300
LF
$2
26,600
11
Ductile Iron Fittings
25
TN
$4,500
112,500
12
12" WL Creek Crossing
100
LF
$140
14,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,650,400
ENG/SURVEY 15% $247,600
SUBTOTAL: $1, 898, 000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $180,400
SUBTOTAL: $2,078,400
CONTINGENCY 25% $519,600
SUBTOTAL: $2,598,000
PROJECT TOTAL $2,598,000
OPINION
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OF PROBABLE COST
�� FREESE
' NICHOLS
May 2013
Construction
Project Number
1 30
Project Description
CR 564 12" Water Line - CR 59 to Broadway
Detailed Description
Approximately 5,400 feet of 126-inch along CR 564 from CR 59 to Broadway.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
5,300
LF
$80
424,000
2
12" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$300
30,000
3
Fire Hydrant
11
EA
$3,200
35,200
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
5
EA
$2,000
10,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
11
EA
$900
9,900
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
7
Trench Safety
5,300
LF
$2
10,600
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
9
TN
$4,500
40,500
SUBTOTAL: $590,200
ENG/SURVEY 15% $88,600
SUBTOTAL: $678, 800
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $64,500
SUBTOTAL: $743,300
CONTINGENCY 25% $185,900
SUBTOTAL: $929,200
PROJECT TOTAL $929,200
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
FREESE
9 <NICHOLS
11av 2013
Construction Project Number1 31
Project Description
1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Dixie Farm & FM 518
Detailed Description
A 1 million gallon composite elevated storage tank at Dixie Farm & FM 518.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
1.0 MG EST (Composite Tank)
1
LS
$1,500,000
1,500,000
2
Foundation
1
LS
$200,000
200,000
3
Site Work
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
4
Piping
1
LS
$40,000
40,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$25,000
25,000
SUBTOTAL: $1, 865, 000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $279,800
SUBTOTAL: $2,144, 800
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $203,800
SUBTOTAL: $2, 348, 600
CONTINGENCY 25% $587,200
SUBTOTAL: $2,935,800
PROJECT TOTAL $2,935,800
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Webster
r1 NICHOLS
APPENDIX E:
Wastewater System 10-Year CIP Project Descriptions and Cost Tables
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rii INICHOLS
City of Pearland
Appendix E: Wastewater System 10-Year CIP Project Descriptions
1. Broadway 12" Trunk Sewer Extension
This project consists of approximately 1,165 feet of 12-inch sanitary sewer line along
Broadway from Country Club Dr. to Regal Oaks Ln. This line will provide gravity sewer
to vacant lots north and south of Broadway east of Liberty/Country Club as well as
serve properties that aren't currently served.
2. Barry Rose WWTP 1.4 MGD Expansion
Expansion of the existing 3.1 MGD Barry Rose WWTP to 4.5 MGD to serve the growing
population in this area.
3. Riverstone Ranch Lift Station & Sanitary Sewer
The City's cost to upsize and provide deeper lines and larger capacity lift station in a
proposed subdivision. The upsizing will allow future developments to connect to the
system.
4. Roy/Max/Garden Roads Basin Sewage System
This project proposed approximately 5,000 feet of 18-inch trunk sewer along
Broadway St. from Food Town's Lift Station to O'Day Rd, approximately 1,300 feet of
15-inch trunk sewer along Garden Rd from Broadway to the lift station and 1,200 feet
of 12-inch sewer line along Roy/May Rd from Broadway to Hickory Slough. These
trunk sewers will serve the areas along the four roadway corridors and will eliminate
old lift stations to provide better service.
5. Southdown WWTP Expansion or Diversion
A 1.0 MGD plant expansion of the Southdown WWTP, which currently serves Brazoria
County MUD's No. 4 and 5, to serve future developments in this basin. An alternative
to this expansion would be diversion of the flows to the Far Northwest WWTP.
E-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r$NICFIOLS
6. Veterans Drive Lift Station Service Area
This project defines the extension of the trunk sewer south along Veterans Dr. as far
as Dare Rd. with gravity sewer service as follows: approximately 1,600 feet of 12-inch,
16,300 feet of 18-inch and 8,000 feet of 24-inch sanitary sewer line. It is anticipated
that this project will be developer driven and the City's cost would be for oversizing
and deepening of the lines.
7. Far Northwest WWTP Expansion [Cost Sharing] (Phase 2)
The City's share of a 2.0 MGD wastewater treatment plant expansion serving the area
west of S.H. 288. The City's share is to serve areas outside of the Shadow Creek Ranch
development.
8. McHard Rd Trunk Sewer
Install, along McHard Rd, approximately 4,500 feet of 24-inch trunk sewer from Cullen
to Southdown WWTP. This project will provide gravity sewer to areas not currently
served by the City.
9. Cullen to WWTP Trunk Sewer
Approximately 8,300 feet of 24-inch trunk sewer along Cullen Blvd. and the projection
of McHard Road, west of Cullen Blvd., to a new WWTP. This line will serve the areas in
this sector.
10. JHEC WWTP 2.0 MGD Expansion (Phase 3)
A 2.0 MGD expansion to the existing 4.0 MGD John Hargrove Environmental Center
WWTP is proposed to increase the wastewater treatment plant capacity to 6.0 MGD
to help this plant meet the wastewater treatment need for the future development.
E-3
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r� NICHOLS
11. Harkey Road Trunk Sewer South of Ravenwood (Oversizing)
Approximately 31,800 feet of 18-inch, 24-inch, 30-inch, and 36-inch trunk sewers
along Harkey Road, Bailey Road (CR 101), CR 100, and Amie Lane. These trunk sewers
will serve the areas along the four roadway corridors. It is anticipated that this project
will be developer driven and the City's cost would be for oversizing and deepening of
the lines.
12. Dixie Farm — State Highway 35 Trunk Sewer
Approximately 4,620 feet of 12-inch along Dixie Farm Road, 8,000 feet of 18-inch and
2,000 feet of 24-inch trunk sewer along State Highway 35. This project will also
include a triplex lift station and approximately 300 feet of 10-inch force main along
Dixie Farm Road.
13. Miller Ranch Road Lift Station & Collection System
Approximately 13,445 feet of 10-inch, 12-inch, 15-inch, and 18-inch sanitary sewer
lines along Hughes Ranch Road and Miller Ranch Roads. These sanitary sewer lines
will serve future developments in this area and eliminate old lift stations to provide
better service.
14. Far Northwest WWTP Expansion (Phase 3)
A 2.0 MGD expansion of this plant to increase capacity to 6.0 MGD to serve areas
outside of Shadow Creek Ranch.
E-4
City of Pearland
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
rI <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
May 2013
Construction Project Number
1 1
Project Description
Broadway Sanitary Sewer
Detailed Description
Approximately 1,165 feet of 12-inch sanitary sewer line along Broadway from Country Club Dr. to Regal Oaks Ln.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" Sanitary Sewer
1,165
LF
$80
93,200
2
48" Diameter Manhole
2
EA
$3,500
7,000
3
Well Pointing
200
LF
$25
5,000
4
Trench Safety
1,165
LF
$4
4,660
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$5,000
5,000
SUBTOTAL:
$114, 900
ENG/SURVEY
15% $17,300
SUBTOTAL:
$132,200
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5% $12,559
SUBTOTAL:
$144,759
CONTINGENCY
25% $36,200
SUBTOTAL:
$181,000
PROJECT TOTAL
$181,000
OPINION
City of Pearland
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP rill
FREESE
NICHOLS
OF PROBABLE COST
May 2013
Construction Project Number
2
Project Description
Barry Rose WWTP 1.4 MGD Expansion
Detailed Description
Expansion of the existing WWTP and headworks with all associated components from 3.1 MGD to 4.5 MGD.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
Lift Station Expansion with Associated Piping & Structural Improvem
1
LS
$9,000,000
9,000,000
SUBTOTAL: $9,000,000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $1,350,000
SUBTOTAL $10, 350, 000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $983,250
SUBTOTAL: $11, 333, 250
CONTINGENCY 25% $2,833,400
SUBTOTAL: $14,166,700
PROJECT TOTAL $14,166,700
IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE PORTION $4,535,048
NOTES:
The Impact Fee Eigible 10-yr capacity need is 0.45 MGD. Therefore, the impact fee eligible portion is $4,535,048.
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP - I NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number
3
Project Description
Riverstone Ranch Lift Station & Sanitary Sewer
Detailed Description
The City's cost to upsize and provide deeper lines and a larger capacity lift station in a proposed subdivision.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
City's cost for upsizing sewer lines & lift station
1
LS
$476,000
476,000
SUBTOTAL: $476,000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $71,400
SUBTOTAL: $547,400
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $52,003
SUBTOTAL: $599,403
CONTINGENCY 25% $149,900
SUBTOTAL: $749,400
PROJECT TOTAL $749,400
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP - I NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number 1 i 4
Project Description
Roy/Max/Garden Roads Basin Sewage System
Detailed Description
Approximately 5,000 feet of 18-inch trunk sewer along Broadway St. from Food Town's Lift Station to O'Day Rd,
approximately 1,300 feet of 15-inch trunk sewer along Garden Rd from Broadway to the lift station and 1,200 feet of
12-inch sewer line along Roy/May Rd from Broadway to Hickory Slough.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" Sanitary Sewer
5,135
LF
$80
410,800
2
15" Sanitary Sewer
1,300
LF
$100
130,000
3
18" Sanitary Sewer
4,840
LF
$130
629,200
4
18" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$450
45,000
5
48" Diameter Manhole
11
EA
$3,500
38,500
6
60" Diameter Manhole
16
EA
$5,000
80,000
7
Well Pointing
5,000
LF
$25
125,000
8
Trench Safety
11,275
LF
$4
45,100
9
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
SUBTOTAL: $1, 553, 600
ENG/SURVEY 15% $233,100
SUBTOTAL: $1,786,700
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $169,737
SUBTOTAL: $1,956,437
CONTINGENCY 25% $489,200
SUBTOTAL: $2,445,700
PROJECT TOTAL $2,445,700
City of Pearland
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP
rFREESE
� <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number 1 5
Project Description
Southdown WWTP Expansion or Diversion
Detailed Description
A 1.0 MGD plant expansion of the Southdown WWTP, which currently serves Brazoria County MUD's No. 4 and 5, to
serve future developments in this basin. An alternative to this expansion would be diversion of the flows to the Far
Northwest WWTP.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
1.0 MGD New WWTP
1,000,000
GAL
$8
8,000,000
SUBTOTAL: $8,000,000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $1,200,000
SUBTOTAL: $9,200,000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $874,000
SUBTOTAL: $10, 074, 000
CONTINGENCY 25% $2,518,500
SUBTOTAL: $12,592,500
PROJECT TOTAL $12,592,500
IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE PORTION $2,508,249
NOTES:
The Impact Fee Eligible 10-yr capacity need is 0.20 MGD. Therefore, the impact fee eligible portion is $2,508,249.
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP 1I I'JICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number
6
Project Description
Veterans Drive Lift Station Service Area
Detailed Description
Approximately 1,600 feet 12-inch, 16,300 feet 18-inch and 8,000 feet 24-inch sanitary sewer line.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" Sanitary Sewer
1,420
LF
$80
113,600
2
18" Sanitary Sewer
15,480
LF
$130
2,012,400
3
24" Sanitary Sewer
7,560
LF
$160
1,209,600
4
24" Boring and Casing
400
LF
$450
180,000
5
18" Boring and Casing
800
LF
$450
360,000
6
12" Boring and Casing
200
LF
$350
70,000
7
48" Diameter Manhole
4
EA
$3,500
14,000
8
60" Diameter Manhole
46
EA
$5,000
230,000
9
Well Pointing
20,000
LF
$25
500,000
10
Trench Safety
23,220
LF
$4
92,880
11
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$150,000
150,000
SUBTOTAL: $4,932,500
ENG/SURVEY 15% $739,900
SUBTOTAL: $5,672,400
CONSTRUCTION MGMI 9.5% $538,878
SUBTOTAL: 56,211,278
CONTINGENCY 25% $1,552,900
SUBTOTAL: $7,764,200
PROJECT TOTAL $7,764,200
IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE PORTION $3,882,100
NOTES:
There will be an oversizing agreement on this project. It is estimated that the City's share would be 50%. Therefore, the Impact Fee Eligible portion
would be $3,252,950.
City of Pearland
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
IFNI <NICHOLS
OPINION
Construction
Project Description
OF PROBABLE COST
Project Number
I
Ma� 2013
7
Far Northwest WWTP Expansion (Phase 2)
Detailed Description
A 2.0 MGD WWTP expansion serving the area west of S.H. 288.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
1
2.0 MGD WWTP Expansion
2,000,000
GAL
$8
16,000,000
SUBTOTAL:
$16,000,000
ENG/SURVEY 15%
$2,400,000
SUBTOTAL:
$18,400,000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5%
$1,748,000'
SUBTOTAL:
$20,148,000
CONTINGENCY 25%
$5,037,0001
SUBTOTAL:
$25,185,000
PROJECT TOTAL
$25,185,000
IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE PORTION
$11,287,121
NOTES:
The Impact Fee Eligible 10-yr capacity need is 0.90 MGD. Therefore, the impact fee eligible portion is $11,287,121.
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP -I <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number j 8
Project Description
McHard Rd Trunk Sewer
Detailed Description
Approximately 4,500 feet of 24-inch sewer from Cullen to Southdown WWTP.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
24" Sanitary Sewer
4,500
LF
$160
720,000
2
60" Diameter Manhole
11
EA
$5,000
55,000
3
Well Pointing
4,500
EA
$25
112,500
4
Trench Safety
4,500
LF
$4
18,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$150,000
150,000
SUBTOTAL: $1, 055, 500
ENG/SURVEY 15% $158,400
SUBTOTAL: $1,213,900
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $115,321
SUBTOTAL: $1,329,221
CONTINGENCY 25% $332,400
SUBTOTAL: $1,661,700
PROJECT TOTAL $1,661,700
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP -R<NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number I 9
Project Description
Cullen to WWTP Trunk Sewer
Detailed Description
Approximately 8,300 feet of 24-inch trunk sewer along Cullen Blvd. and the projection of McHard Road, west of
Cullen Blvd., to a new WWTP.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
24" Sanitary Sewer
8,200
LF
$160
1,312,000
2
24" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$450
45,000
3
60" Diameter Manhole
18
EA
$5,000
90,000
4
Well Pointing
8,200
LF
$25
205,000
5
Trench Safety
8,200
LF
$4
32,800
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$40,000
40,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,724,800
ENG/SURVEY 15% $258,800
SUBTOTAL: $1, 983, 600
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $188,442
SUBTOTAL: $2,172, 042
CONTINGENCY 25% $543,100
SUBTOTAL: $2,715,200
PROJECT TOTAL $2,715,200
City of Pearland FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP IFNI<NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number 10
Project Description
JHEC WWTP Expansion (Phase 3)
Detailed Description
A 2.0 MGD plant expansion is proposed to increase capacity to 6.0 MGD to help this plant meet the wastewater
treatment need for the future development.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
2.0 MGD WVVTP Expansion
2,000,000
GAL
$8
16,000,000
SUBTOTAL: $16, 000, 000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $2,400,000
SUBTOTAL: $18, 400, 000
CONSTRUCTION MGMI 9.5% $1,748,000
SUBTOTAL: $20,148, 000
CONTINGENCY 25% $5,037,000
SUBTOTAL: $25,185,000
PROJECT TOTAL $25,185,000
IMPACT FEE ELIGIBLE PORTION $5,643,560
NOTES:
The 10-yr capacity need is 0.45 MGD. Therefore, the impact fee eligible portion is $5,643,560.
OPINION
City of Pearland
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP
ril FREESE
<NICHOLS
OF PROBABLE COST
May 2013
Construction Project Number
I 11
Project Description
Harkey Road Trunk Sewer South of Ravenwood (Oversizing)
Detailed Description
Approximately 31,800 feet of 18-inch, 24-inch, 30-inch, and 36-inch trunk sewers along Harkey Road, Bailey Road
(CR101), and Amie Lane.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
18" Sanitary Sewer
10,050
LF
$130
1,306,500
2
24" Sanitary Sewer
11,500
LF
$160
1,840,000
3
30" Sanitary Sewer
4,000
LF
$200
800,000
4
36" Sanitary Sewer
6,250
LF
$252
1,575,000
5
60" Diameter Manhole
75
EA
$5,000
375,000
6
Well Pointing
15,000
LF
$25
375,000
7
Trench Safety
31,800
LF
$4
127,200
8
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$150,000
150,000
SUBTOTAL:
$6, 548,700
ENG/SURVEY
15% $982,400
SUBTOTAL:
$7, 531,100
CONSTRUCTION MGM7
9.5% $715,455
SUBTOTAL:
$8, 246, 555
CONTINGENCY
25% $2,061,700
SUBTOTAL:
$10, 308, 300
PROJECT TOTAL
$10,308,300
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP - I NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
1 12
Dixie Farm -State Highway 35 Trunk Sewer
Detailed Description
Approximately 4,620 feet of 12-inch sewer along Dixie Farm road, 8,000 feet of 18-inch and 2,000 feet of 24-inch
trunk sewer along State Highway 35.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
Lift Station (Triplex)
1
LS
$300,000
300,000
2
12" Sanitary Sewer
4,500
LF
$80
360,000
3
18" Sanitary Sewer
8,000
LF
$130
1,040,000
4
24" Sanitary Sewer
2,000
LF
$160
320,000
5
12" Boring and Casing
120
LF
$350
42,000
6
48" Diameter Manhole
9
EA
$3,500
31,500
7
60" Diameter Manhole
26
EA
$5,000
130,000
8
10" Force Main
300
LF
$60
18,000
9
Well Pointing
5,000
LF
$25
125,000
10
Trench Safety
14,500
LF
$4
58,000
11
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
SUBTOTAL: $2,474, 500
ENG/SURVEY 15% $371,200
SUBTOTAL: $2, 845, 700
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $270,342
SUBTOTAL: $3,116, 042
CONTINGENCY 25% $779,100
SUBTOTAL: $3,895,200
PROJECT TOTAL $3,895,200
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP-7<NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROI3ABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number1 13
Project Description
Miller Ranch Road Lift Station & Collection System
Detailed Description
Approximately 13,445 feet of 10-inch, 12-inch, 15-inch, and 18-inch sanitary sewer lines along Hughes Ranch Road
and Miller Ranch Roads.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
10" Sanitary Sewer
1,570
LF
$70
109,900
2
12" Sanitary Sewer
4,015
LF
$80
321,200
3
15" Sanitary Sewer
3,460
LF
$100
346,000
4
18" Sanitary Sewer
4,400
LF
$130
572,000
5
48" Diameter Manhole
12
EA
$3,500
42,000
6
60" Diameter Manhole
22
EA
$5,000
110,000
7
Well Pointing
7,000
EA
$25
175,000
8
Trench Safety
13,445
LF
$4
53,780
9
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$60,000
60,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,789, 900
ENG/SURVEY 15% $268,500
SUBTOTAL: $2,058,400
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $195,548
SUBTOTAL: $2, 253, 948
CONTINGENCY 25% $563,500
SUBTOTAL: $2,817,500
PROJECT TOTAL $2,817,500
City of Pearland
FREESE
Wastewater 2012 Impact Fee CIP -• <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
1 14
Far Northwest WWTP Expansion (Phase 3)
Detailed Description
A 2.0 MGD expansion of this plant to increase capacity to 6.0 MGD to serve areas outside of Shadow Creek Ranch.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
2.0 MGD WWTP Expansion (CIP # 16)
2,000,000
GAL
$8
16,000,000
SUBTOTAL: $16,000,000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $2,400,000
SUBTOTAL: $18,400,000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $1,748,000
SUBTOTAL: $20,148,000
CONTINGENCY 25% $5,037,000
SUBTOTAL: $25,185,000
PROJECT TOTAL $25,185,000
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
APPENDIX F:
Analysis of Water and Wastewater Plants Reserve Capacity
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
ANALYSIS OF WTP CAPACITY
rBNICNOLS
REQUIREMENTS TO MEET YEAR 2022 DEMAND
5 MGD Surface Water Contract
New 10 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant
$22,000,000
$68,237,400
Existing Service Units: 37,491 SUEs
10-year Projected Increase: 21,418 SUEs
2012 Water Demand: 33,386 connections x 0.47 gpm/connection = 15,691 gpm
10-year Projection: 48,809 connections x 0.556 gpm/connection = 27,138 gpm
Total Water Demand by 2022: 27,138 gpm
Available Capacity: 23,936 gpm
Additional Capacity Required by 2022: 3,202 gpm
In order to increase the current supply to provide the additional 3,202 gpm (4.61 MGD), an
additional 5 MGD surface water contract could be negotiated with the City of Houston.
However, it is still necessary to pursue the construction of a new surface water treatment plant
to provide required water production capacity to the west side of the City.
Therefore, the 10-yr eligible costs for the impact fee are:
10-yr portion of 5 MGD Contract = $22,000,000 x 0% = $0
10-yr portion of New 10 MGD Surface Water Treatment Plant
= $68,237,400 x 4.606868/10.0 = $31,436,067
F-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
ANALYSIS OF COMPLETED WATER PROJECTS
DEBT SERVICE ALLOCATIONS
Completed Water Lines:
Old Alvin Road 20" Water Line
McHard Road 16" Water Line
Houston 30" Interconnect Transmission Line
Magnolia Rd 12" Water Line (FM1128)
Bailey Rd 24" & 30" Water Transmission Lines
BW 8 / SH 288 12" Water Line
SH 35 Water 16" Water Line - South of Magnolia
SH 35 16" Water Line - FM 518 to Clear Creek
Dixie Farm Rd 16" Water Line
McHard Surface Water Connection & Line
Kingsley 20" Water Line - Broadway to Trinity Bay
Hawk Road 12" Water Line
Pearland Pkwy 12" Water Line Extension
Debt Service Allocations Are As Follows:
NM FREESE
IFIIM NICHOLS
$ 2,556,718
$ 7,090,901
$ 19,599,542
$ 716,750
$ 360,145
$ 743,257
$ 338,936
$ 1,399,492
$ 2,066,461
$ 406,281
$ 198,750
$ 63,624
$ 502,100
$ 36,042,957
Water Line Projects
Project Cost
Paid Cash
10 Year
Debt Service
Allocation
10 Year
Total Cost
(2012 - 2022)
Old Alvin Road 20" Water Line
$2,556,718
$1,556,718
$687,476
$2,244,194
McHard Road 16" Water Line
$7,090,901
$629,857
$3,992,053
$4,621,910
Houston 30" Interconnect Transmission Line
$19,599,542
$3,331,235
$12,362,197
$15,693,432
Magnolia Rd 12" Water Line (FM1128)
$716,750
$116,750
$412,543
$529,293
Bailey Rd 24" & 30" Water Transmission Lines
$360,145
$360,145
$0
$360,145
BW 8 / SH 288 12" Water Line
$743,257
$743,257
$0
$743,257
SH 35 Water 16" Water Line - South of Magnolia Road
$338,936
$338,936
$0
$338,936
SH 35 16" Water Line - FM 518 to Clear Creek
$1,399,492
$74,492
$543,569
$618,061
Dixie Farm Rd 16" Water Line
$2,066,461
$0
$1,278,247
$1,278,247
McHard Surface Water Connection & Line
$406,281
$0
$166,716
$166,716
Kingsley 20" Water Line - Broadway to Trinity Bay
$198,750
$0
$0
$0
Hawk Road 12" Water Line
$63,624
$63,624
$0
$63,624
Pearland Pkwy 12" Water Line Extension
$502,100
$502,100
$0
$502,100
Total:
$27,159,915
F-3
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rii?NICHOLS
City of Pearland
ANALYSIS OF WWTP CAPACITY EXPANSIONS
DEBT SERVICE ALLOCATIONS
Completed Expansions:
JHEC WWTP Expansion — Phase 2 (1.65 MGD) $ 19,940,189
Far Northwest Expansion — Phase 1 (2.00 MGD) $10,000,000
Barry Rose WWTP Expansion (0.85 MGD) 609,914
Longwood WWTP Expansion (0.75 MGD) 1,879,431
Total Completed Expansions (5.25 MGD)
Debt Service Allocations Are As Follows:
$ 32,429,534
WWTP Exyansion
Project Cost
Paid Cash
10 Year
Debt Service
Allocation
10 Year
Total Cost
(2012 - 2022)
SWEC
$19,940,189
$3,122,793
$18,453,544
$21,576,337
Far Northwest
$10,000,000
$0
$11,200,625
$11,200,625
Barry Rose
$609,914
$0
$365,772
$365,772
Longwood
$1,879,431
$0
$1,137,956
$1,137,956
Total:
$34,280,690
Since entire 5.25 MGD expansion is needed to meet current and 10-yr period demand, the total
allocation is impact fee eligible.
F-4
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report rill NICHOLS
City of Pearland
ANALYSIS OF WWTP CAPACITY
REQUIREMENTS TO MEET YEAR 2022 DEMAND
Existing Service Units: 37,460 SUEs
10-year Projected Increase: 21,418 SUEs
2012 Wastewater Flow: 6.60 MGD
10-year Projection: (58,878 SUEs)(2.3 persons/SUE)(100 gal/person) = 13.54 MGD
Available Capacity: 11.55 MGD
Additional Capacity Required by 2022: 1.99 MGD
Projected Wastewater Flows by Service Area were determined using the Future Land Use and
Projected Growth map (Figure 2.1):
WWTP Service Area
Projected
10 Year
Population
Growth
Wastewater
Flow Rate
(gpcd)
Projected
Wastewater
Flow Increase
(MGD)
Eligible
Projected
Wastewater
Flow Increase
(MGD)
SWEC
4,500
100
0.45
0.45
Far Northwest
9,000
100
0.90
0.89
Barry Rose
4,500
100
0.45
0.45
Southdown
2,000
100
0.20
0.20
Total:
2.00
1.99
Impact Fee Eligible WWTP Expansion costs were determined using the Eligible Projected
Wastewater Flow Increases:
WWTP Expansion
Expansion
(MGD)
Eligible
Projected
Wastewater
Flow Increase
(MGD)
Percent of
Expansion
Impact Fee
Eligible
Expansion
Cost Estimate
Impact Fee
Eligible
Expansion
Cost
Estimate
SWEC
2.00
0.45
22%
$25,185,000
$5,540,700
Far Northwest
2.00
0.89
44%
$25,185,000
$11,081,400
Barry Rose
1.40
0.45
32%
$14,166,700
$4,533,344
Southdown
1.00
0.20
20%
$12,592,500
$2,518,500
Total:
6.40
1.99
$77,129,200
$23,673,944
F-5
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
1 NICHOLS
ANALYSIS OF COMPLETED SEWER PROJECTS
DEBT SERVICE ALLOCATIONS
Completed Sewers:
Magnolia Corridor Trunk Sewer
SH 35 30" Trunk Sewer
BW 8 / SH 288 12" FM and Sanitary Sewer Line
SH 35 18" Sewer - Broadway to Clear Creek
Veterans Dr 27" Sewer - Wells to Bailey Rd
Shadow Creek Parkway Trunk Sewer (Phase 1)
Shadow Creek Parkway Trunk Sewer (Phase 2)
Debt Service Allocations Are As Follows:
$3,542,778
$4,935,371
$1,884,600
$3,783,813
$530,470
$1,040,282
$980,718
$16,698,032
Sewer Line Projects
Project
Cost
Paid Cash
10 Year
Debt Service
Allocation
10 Year
Total Cost
(2012 - 2022)
Magnolia Corridor Trunk Sewer
$3,542,778
$1,807,778
$1,087,155
$2,894,933
SH 35 30" Trunk Sewer
$4,935,371
$2,200,000
$1,065,208
$3,265,208
BW 8 / SH 288 12" FM and Sanitary Sewer Line
$1,884,600
$1,884,600
$0
$1,884,600
SH 35 18" Sewer - Broadway to Clear Creek
$3,783,813
$88,813
$9,995,994
$10,084,807
Veterans Dr 27" Sewer - Wells to Bailey Rd
$530,470
$0
$0
$0
Shadow Creek Parkway Trunk Sewer (Phase 1)
$1,040,282
$0
$609,620
$609,620
Shadow Creek Parkway Trunk Sewer (Phase 2)
$980,718
$0
$584,219
$584,219
Total:
$19,323,387
F-6
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report i NICHQLS
City of Pearland
APPENDIX G:
Public Hearing Presentation — April 22, 2013
0
M
O
NI
\
N
M
0
MI
\
M
M
0
CV
\
M
M
0
CV
Cr
4/22/2013
M
0
CV
CA
\
LA
Workshop with CIAC
Workshop with City Council
Submit Advertising for Public Hearing
Conduct Public Hearing
1st Reading of Impact Fee Ordinance
2nd Reading of Impact Fee Ordinance
0
G
eve o. Lan. Use Assum •tion
. F- - C. cu ation
O
$208,824,144
21,418
LA
00
44
cu
cu
t
O
00
N
006
-cm-
21,418
160
at
r'vl
Water
$119,043,469
21,418
at
Total Eligible Capital Improvements
Costs (50% Eligible)
Growth in Service Units
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee
per Service Unit with Credit
rvice it Factor
1
€
Does not Include restaurant
Does not Include carwash
Does not Include reclamation
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not include carwash
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not Include carwash
Does not include restaurant
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
Patient Care Area - Does not Include designated office areas
Does not Include restaurant
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
_ Average: Each development must be Individually evaluated
u
2
'Non -disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
**Disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
Does not include resident dormitory
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
0
0 0
0 0
d A
M
0.003200
0.004700
0.031000
0.000220
C O
0.000335
O G
O r1
o O,
O O
O O
O O
O g
0 0
0 0
V O
0 0
o A
A
o A
a O
O O
O G
O G
O G
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 ..
i
LL
m
Lane
Square Foot
Nc 1-
Lane
Occupant
r r
Q
r LL
Y
Occupant
Occupant
p
LL
A
Bed
Tee
€
o C
u 1 1 i i
C
Square Foot
Occupant
Occupant
Bed
• 501bs
Square Foot _
LL
Store
Square Foot
Court
Space
Dwelling Unit
Dwelling Unit
Dwelling Unit
Dwelling Unit
Seat
S
Occupant
Seat •
y
«
Square Foot
Machine
ri
8
w 'E
Vi
N 4
3
Carwash, Tunnel With Attendants
Church, Administration
Church, Auditorium
Church, Classroom
Club/Tavern/Lounge
Convenience Store
Country Club
Day Care Center
or Office/Dentist Office/Emergency Clinic
Dormitory
Driving Range
Fire Station
Funeral Hone
Gas Station, Self -Service
Gas Station, Full -Service
s z
ox
Health Club w/ Whirpool or Swimming Pod
Hospital
c
ti. -,.=3
xs
« x
Ice Cream Parlor with Seating
Indoor Entertainment/Amusement w/o Restaurant
r o
v'izg;oc
m
a
o G
a '
s
5 1
m
x
Resident, Apartment
Resident, Condominium
Resident, Duplex
Resident, Town House,
Restaurant, Full-Servke, General
Restaurant, Fast Food with Seating
Restaurant, Fast Food without Seating
Restaurant, Buffet with Seating"
Restaurant, Buffet with Seating**
School, Other
Skating Rink
Swimming Pool
Stadium
58 Toilet lnon-specific)
59 Transportation Terminal without Restaurant
60 Warehouse
61 Washaterla
4..
.
..«'
{4S4
3
43144
',J44'10344
YJAm'•f'
43
tRUMAISr,4**V/Sr9S512VMI
rA
14
M
{;
0.470000 a
Unit of
Measure
0
CO
Development Type
Beauty Salon
°
rn
Ns
14
D
if
0.000335
Unit of
Measure
Square Foot
Development Type
Doctor Office/
Dentist Office/
Emergency Clinic
2
ri
Service Unit Factors
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
APPENDIX H:
City Ordinance No. 1479
rIM?NICHOLS
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND,
TEXAS, REVISING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR THE CITY
OF PEARLAND; UPDATING IMPACT FEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
STATE LAW; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING A PENALTY
FOR VIOLATION; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE AND A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION,
CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, by virtue of Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated, Volume 3, Local
Government Code, Chapter 395 ("State Law"), the City Council has found it necessary and
appropriate to revise the City's capital improvements plan and update impact fees to
comply with the provisions of said State Law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has employed qualified professionals to revise the
capital improvements plan and calculate updated impact fees, and has held a public
hearing, as required by State Law, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt the revised capital improvements
plan and levy an updated impact fee in accordance with said State Law; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS:
Section 1. The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance are
hereby found to be true and correct.
Section 2. The capital improvements plan, included in a study by Freese and
Nichols entitled Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update 2012 (the "Study"), is
incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all purposes.
Section 3. The updated impact fee calculations, included in the Study made a part
hereof for all purposes, are hereby approved and adopted.
1
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
Section 4. The impact fees set forth in the Study are hereby levied against new
development on lands located within the corporate boundaries of the City of Pearland. The
impact fees levied hereby are subject to the applicable provisions of State Law.
Section 5. Penalty. Any person who shall violate the provisions of this section
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction by a court of
competent jurisdiction, be punished by a fine in any sum not exceeding Five Hundred
Dollars ($500.00).
Section 6. Savings. All rights and remedies which have accrued in favor of the
City under this Chapter and amendments thereto shall be and are preserved for the benefit
of the City.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid, unconstitutional or otherwise
unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 8. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed but only to the extent of such conflict.
Section 9. Codification. It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Pearland,
Texas, that the provisions of this Ordinance shall be codified in the City's official Code of
Ordinances as provided hereinabove.
Section 10. Publication and Effective Date. The City Secretary shall cause this
Ordinance, or its caption and penalty, to be published in the official newspaper of the City
2
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
of Pearland, upon passage of such Ordinance. The Ordinance shall then become effective
ten (10) days after its publication, or the publication of its caption and penalty, in the official
City newspaper.
PASSED and APPROVED ON FIRST READING this the 22nd day of April, A. D.,
2013.
ATTEST:
MA IA E. RODRIGU Z
DEP TY CITY SECRETARY
3
TOM REID
MAYOR
ORDINANCE NO. 1479
PASSED and APPROVED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING this the 13th day of
May, A. D., 2013.
ATTEST:
z
M ' IA E. RODRIGUEZ
DE"UTY CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(43-4----------
u6
DARRIN M. COKER
CITY ATTORNEY
4
TOM REI D
MAYOR
NOTE TO CITY COUNCIL
Study to be attached to original executed ordinance as Exhibit "A".
Copy available in City Secretary's office for review.
Memorandum
To: Mayor Reid and City Council
From: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC)
Date: February 22, 2013
RE: 2012 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Report Update
On February 18, 2013 the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee met to review and take
action on the 2012 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Report Update. The Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee recommends approval of the proposed 2012 Water and
Wastewater Impact Fee Report Update.
Sincerely
Henry Fuertes
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
Chairperson
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
�1 �u�uiois
Table 2.3 City of Pearland Service Unit Factors
Ao.
Development Type
Unit of Measure
S.U.E.
Remarks
1
Bakery
Square Foot
0.000700
2
Barber Shop
Chair
0.470000
3
Beauty Salon
P:.4;
0.470000
4
Bowling Alley
Lane
0.635000
Does not Include restaurant
5
CarRepair
Square Foot
0.000160
Does not indude carwash
6
Carwash, Tunnel Self Service
Lane
6.350000
7
C-arwash, Wand Type Self Service
Bay
1.220000
8
Carwash, Tunnel With Attendants
Lane
31.430000
Does not include reclamation
9
Church, Administration
Occupant
0.047.000
Occupancy Loads established by theadopted building codes
10
Church, Auditorium
Seat
0.003200
11
Ghurch, Classroom
Seat
0.004700
12
Club/Tavern/Lounge
Seat
0.031000
13
ConvenienceStore
Square Foot
0.000220
14
Country Club
Occupant
0.390000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
15
Day CareCenter
Occupant
0.031700
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted buildln&codes
16
Doctor Office/Dentist Office/Emergency Clinic
Square Foot
0.090335
17
Dormitory
Bed
0.286000
18
Driving Range
Tee
0.210000
19
Fire Station
Employee
0.286000
20
Funeral Home
Embalming Station
2.140000
23
Gas Station, Self -Service
Island
0.800000
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not include carwash
22
Gas Station, Full -Service
Island
0.860000
Island is defined as 1 pumping station - Does not include carwash
23
Grocery Store
Square Foot
0.000260
Does not include restaurant
24
Health Club
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
25
Health Club w/ Whirpool orSwimming Pool
Occupant
O032000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
26
Hospital
Bed
0.635000
Patient Care Area - Does not include designated office areas
27
Hotel/Motel
Room
0,251000
Does not include restaurant
28
Hotel/Motel with Kitchenettes
Room
0.430000
3
Ice Cream Parlor with Seating
Seat
0.047000
s0
Indoor Entertainment/Amusement w/o Restaurant
Occupant
0.031000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
31
Industrial Laundry
50dbs
0.950000
32
Manufacturing
Square Foot
0.000160
Average: Each development must be individually evaluated
33
Nursing Home
Bed
0.286000
34
Office Building
Square Foot
0.000335
35
Photo Store, 1-Hour Protesting
Store
4.000000
36
Post Office, Excluding Dock
Square Foot
0.000254
37
Raquetball Club
Court
O.510000
38
Recreational Vehicle Park
Space
0.238100
39
Resident, Apartment
Dwelling Unit
0.700030
Basic Service Unit
40
Resident, Condominium
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
41
Resident, Duplex
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
42
Resident, Mobile Home
Dwelling Unit
0.700000
43
Resident, Single Family
Dwelling Unit
1,000003
44
Resident, Town House
Dwelling Unit
1.000000
45
Restaurant, FullzService, General
Seat
0.110000
46
Restaurant, Fast Food with Seating
Seat
0.047000
47
Restaurant, Fast Food without Seating
Square Foot
0.002300
48
Restaurant, Buffet with Seating*
Seat
0.110000
*Non -disposable Dinnerware and Flatware
49
Restaurant, Buffetwith Seating`*
Seat
0.070500
'"'Disposable Dinnerware and'Fdatware
50
Retail Store
Square Foot
,,
0.000223
51
School, High
Seat
0.047600
Does not include residentdormitoly
52
School, Other
Seat
0.031700
Does not include resident dormitory
53
Skating Rink
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy loads established by the adopted building codes
54
Swimming Pool
Occupant
0.016000
Occupancy Loads established by the adopted building codes
55
Stadium
Seat
0.010000
56
Theatre, Drive-in
Space
0.016000
57
Theatre, Indoor
Seat
0.0.16000
58
Toilet(non-specificl
Toilet
0.254000
1
Transportation Terminal without Restaurant
Passenger
0.016000
Warehouse
Square Foot
0.000100
I,J
61
Washateria
Machine
1.580000
2-6
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
�iiois
City of Pearland
APPENDIX C:
Water Facilities Capacity Criteria
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report FNICHOLS
City of Pearland
TEXAS COMMISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM RULES & REGULATIONS
ALTERNATIVE CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS
Water Distribution
Pressure
Water Storage
Wells
Distribution system shall provide a minimum of 20 psi under peak
conditions and a minimum of 35 psi during normal operating
conditions (1.5 gpm per connection).
Capacity 158 gallons of total storage capacity per connection of which 100
gallon/connection must be from elevated tanks.
Capacity Provide at least 0.47 gpm per connection in 2012 and 0.556 gpm
per connection by 2022.
Booster Pumps
Each pump station shall have two or more pumps that have a
total capacity of 1.6 gpm per connection OR that have a total
capacity of at least 1,000 gpm and the ability to meet peak flow
hourly demands with the largest pump out of service, whichever
is Tess.
Auxiliary Power Provide 0.35 gpm per connection in case of power outages, if
system does not meet the elevated storage requirement.
C-2
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report IFININICHOLS
City of Pearland
CALCULATION OF EXISTING AND
FUTURE DEMAND VERSUS EXISTING CAPACITY
1. Current Conditions: Impact Fee Eligible Population = 95,101 persons
Impact Fee Eligible Equivalent Service Units = 37,491 units
Water Supply Capacity:
33,386 connections x 0.47 gpm/connection
= 15,691 gpm or 22,595,645 gpd required
21,300 gpm treated water supply currently available
11.433 MGD surface water contracts, or 7,940 gpm equivalent flow, plus 13,360
gpm from wells is available. The City's required demand is approximately 74% of
contracted supply and well production amount.
Booster Pumps:
Criteria 1:
33,386 connections x 1.6 gpm/connection
= 53,418 gpm required
57,850 gpm available
Criteria 2:
With the exception of the booster pumps at the Old City Hall and Green
Tee Water Plants, the existing booster pumps meet the requirement of
1,000 gpm minimum capacity with the largest pump out of service at
each station. If they are not decommissioned, FNI recommends that the
booster pumps at these Water Plants be upgraded to 1,000 gpm pumps
or add an additional pump.
C-3
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
FNRICNOLEESE
BS
Auxiliary Power:
System meets the elevated storage requirement, therefore, auxiliary power
criteria is met.
Storage Capacity:
Total Ground and Elevated Storage
33,386 connections x 158 gal/connection
= 5,274,988 gal total required (or 28% of available storage)
19,104,000 gal total available
Elevated Storage:
33,386 connections x 100 gal/connection
= 3,338,600 gal total required (or 74% of available storage)
4,500,000 gal available
Distribution Pressure:
Capacity, as defined by maintaining minimum pressures during normal and peak
conditions, cannot be determined without a detailed system analysis which is
beyond the scope of this study.
C-4
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report Fil NICHOLS
City of Pearland
2. Year 2022 Conditions: Impact Fee Eligible Population = 131,165 persons
Impact Fee Eligible Equivalent Service Units = 58,909 units
Water Supply Capacity:
48,809 connections x 0.556 gpm/connection
= 27,138 gpm or 39,078,438 gpd required
23,936 gpm treated water supply available in 2022
16.0 MGD surface water contracts, or 11,111 gpm equivalent flow, plus 12,825
gpm from wells is available. The City's required demand is approximately 113%
of contracted supply and well production amount. FNI recommends that the
City obtain a minimum of 5 MGD additional water supply in the next ten year
time period.
Booster Pumps:
Criteria 1:
48,809 connections x 1.6 gpm/connection
= 78,094 gpm required
56,200 gpm available
Criteria 2:
With the exception of the booster pumps at the Old City Hall and Green
Tee Water Plants, the existing booster pumps meet the requirement of
1,000 gpm minimum capacity with the largest pump out of service at
each station. If they are not decommissioned, FNI recommends that the
booster pumps at these Water Plants be upgraded to 1,000 gpm pumps
or add an additional pump.
C-5
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r� NICHOLS
Auxiliary Power:
When the system meets the elevated storage requirement, auxiliary power
criteria will be met.
Storage Capacity:
Total Ground and Elevated Storage
48,809 connections x 158 gal/connection
= 7,711,822 gal total required (or 42% of available storage)
18,567,000 gal total available
Elevated Storage:
48,809 connections x 100 gal/connection
= 4,880,900 gal total required (or 108% of available storage)
4,500,000 gal available
FNI recommends that the City construct a minimum of 1 MGD additional elevated storage tank
in the next ten year time period.
C-6
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r9i�� ors
APPENDIX D:
Water System 10-Year CIP Project Descriptions and Cost Tables
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r1� NICHOLS
Appendix D: Water System 10-Year CIP Project Descriptions
1. SH 35 16" Water Line — FM 518 to John Lizer
Install approximately 9,800 feet of 16-inch water transmission line along SH 35 from
FM 518 to Magnolia/John Lizer. This line completes Pearland's major north -south line.
2. Veterans Drive 12" Water Line
Install approximately 1,900 feet of 12-inch water line on Veterans Drive south of
Walnut. The water line, in addition to providing water service to the area, will
complete a water line loop.
3. 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Riley Rd. & Kirby Dr.
A 1.0 million gallon composite elevated storage tank at Riley Rd. & Kirby Dr. This
elevated tank will provide the required elevated storage needed for the first 10-year
period.
4. CR 94 12" Water Line
Install approximately 5,300 feet of 12-inch water line from Hughes Ranch Rd/CR 403
to just north of FM 518/Broadway. The water line will provide water service to new
developments in the area.
5. FM 521 16" Water Line
Install approximately 7,500 feet of 16-inch water transmission line along Almeda
Rd/FM 521 from Broadway to Mooring Pointer Dr. The water line, in addition to
providing water service to the area, will complete a water line loop.
D-2
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report rii.,NICHOLS
City of Pearland
6. Fellows Loop 12" Water Line
Install approximately 14,400 feet of 12" water line to loop from the termination of the
existing waterline along the feeder road of BW 8 along Fellows to Cullen and
terminating at Hawk Rd. The water line, in addition to providing water service to the
area, will complete a water line loop.
7. Surface Water Treatment Plant (Phase 1)
Design and construction of a 10 MGD surface water treatment plant with room to
expand to 20 MGD.
8. FM 1128 16" Water Line
Install approximately 5,300 feet of 16-inch water line along FM 1128 (Manvel Rd) from
Bailey Rd to CR 100. The water line, in addition to providing water service to new
developments in the area, will complete a water line loop.
9. CR 100 16" Water Line
Install approximately 13,200 feet of 16-inch water line along CR100 from Veterans Dr.
to FM 1128 (Manvel Rd). The water line, in addition to providing water service to new
developments in the area, will complete a water line loop.
10. Harkey Rd. & CR 128 12" Water Line
Install approximately 13,300 feet of 12-inch water line from Harkey Rd/CR 100 south to
CR 128 then east to Veterans Dr. The water line, in addition to providing water service
to new developments in the area, will complete a water line loop.
11. Veterans Dr. 16" Water Line — Bailey Rd to CR 128
Install approximately 13,200 feet of 16-inch water line along CR100 from Veterans Dr.
to FM 1128 (Manvel Rd). The water line, in addition to providing water service to new
developments in the area, will complete a water line loop.
D-3
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report IFNI NICHOLS
City of Pearland
12. CR 48 North 30" & 20" Water Lines
Approximately 8,000 feet of 30-inch water line and approximately 5,000 feet of 20-
inch water line along CR 48 from the future water treatment plant to Broadway.
13. CR 59 20" Water Line
Approximately 10,800 feet of 20-inch water transmission line along CR 59 from CR 94
to CR 48 and approximately 800 feet of 12-inch water on Kirby Drive, north of CR 59.
14. Far Northwest Water Plant Expansions (Phase 3)
Installation of a third 1.66 million gallon ground storage tank, a second 15,000 gallon
pressure tank, and related piping and controls. This expansion will be for future
developments outside of Shadow Creek Ranch.
D-4
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
rilfnUREs
15. Purchase 5 MGD from City of Houston
The existing Alice water plant will be expanded to accept an additional 5 MGD from
the City of Houston's Southeast Plant.
16. 0.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Garden Road Water Plant
A 500,000-gallon elevated storage tank at the Garden Road Water Plant. This elevated
tank will provide the required elevated storage needed for future developments.
17. Bailey Road 24' Water Line — Veterans Drive to FM 1128
Approximately 14,100 feet of 24-inch water line along Bailey Road from Veterans Drive
to FM 1128, 1,100 feet of 16-inch water line along Harkey Road, and 1,100 feet of 12-
inch water line along McClean Road.
18. Bailey Road 24" water Line — FM 1128 to CR 48
Approximately 30,500 of 24-inch water Tine along Bailey Road extending from FM
1128 to CR 48. This line will be the major transmission line from the future water
treatment plant to the east.
19. State Highway 35 12" Water Line
Approximately 8,000 feet of 12-inch water line on State Highway 35 extending from
Dixie Farm Road to the south. This water line will provide water for future
developments south of Dixie Farm Road.
20. Hughes Ranch — Stone Road 12" Water Line
Approximately 7,400 feet of 12-inch water line along Stone Road from Brookside Road
to Hughes Ranch Road and Hughes Ranch Road from Stone Road to Cullen Blvd.
21. Broadway (FM 518) 16" Water Line
Approximately 14,000 feet of 16-inch water line extending from Harkey Road to Texas.
D-5
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report
City of Pearland
r� NICHOLS
22. Far East Water Plant, Elevated Storage & 12" Water Lines
A new water plant with a water well, 1 million gallon ground storage and 1 million
gallon elevated storage tanks, booster pumps, electrical, and piping, etc. In addition,
approximately 11,600 feet of 12-inch and 1,000 feet of 16-inch water transmission
lines along CR 127 from Dixie Farm Road to CR 130 and CR 130 from CR 131 to CR 127.
23. Alice Water Plant Expansion (Phase 2)
A new 5 million gallon ground storage tank with additional 2 new booster pumps,
controls, and piping.
24. Roy Road 12" Water Line
Approximately 8,500 feet of 12-inch water line along Roy Road from FM 518 to
Brookside Road. This line will provide water for areas along Roy Road.
25. FM 521 & Riley Road 12" Water Lines
Approximately 13,500 feet of 12-inch water line along Riley Road from Kirby Drive to
Almeda Road (FM 521) and Almeda Road (FM 521) from Riley Road to the Shadow
Creek Ranch connection.
26. CR 129 & CR 127 12" Water Lines
Approximately 11,600 feet of 12-inch water line along CR 127 from CR 130 to CR 129
and CR 129 from CR 127 to State Highway.
27. Hastings Cannon Road (CR 128) 12" Water Line
Approximately 13,100 feet of 12-inch water line extending from State Highway 35 to
Pearland Sites Road (CR 143) along Hastings Cannon Road (CR 128).
D-6
FREESE
Water & Wastewater Draft Impact Fee Report ram NICHOLS
City of Pearland
28. Hastings Field Road 16" Water Line
Approximately 10,200 feet of 16-inch water transmission line along Hastings Field
Road from State Highway 35 to Pearland Sites Road (CR 143).
29. CR 59 & CR 564 12" & 16" Water Lines
Approximately 5,400 feet of 16-inch and 8,200 feet of 12-inch water line along CR 59
from CR 48 to Wood Street. In addition, a 12-inch line, approximately 5,400 feet long,
will extend from CR 564 B to CR 59 along CR 564.
30. CR 564 212" Water Line — CR 59 to Broadway
Approximately 5,400 feet of 126-inch along CR 564 from CR 59 to Broadway.
31. 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Dixie Farm & FM 518
A 1 million gallon composite elevated storage tank at Dixie Farm & FM 518. This
elevated tank will provide the required elevated storage needed for the first 10-year
period.
D-7
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP •7NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number
1
Project Description
SH 35 Water Transmission Line - FM 518 to Magnolia
Detailed Description
Install approximately 9,800 feet of 16-inch water line along State Highway 35 from FM 518 to just south of
Magnolia/John Lizer.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
9,600
LF
$105
1,008,000
2
Fire Hydrant
20
EA
$3,200
64,000
3
16" Gate Valve with Box
3
EA
$10,000
30,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
20
EA
$900
18,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
6
Trench Safety
9,600
LF
$2
19,200
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
20
TN
$4,500
90,000
8
16" WL Creek Crossing.
200
LF
$190
38,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,297,200
ENG/SURVEY 15% $194,600
SUBTOTAL: $1,491, 800
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $141,800
SUBTOTAL: $1, 633,600
CONTINGENCY 25% $408,400
SUBTOTAL: $2,042,000
PROJECT TOTAL $2,042,000
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP IFill NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
2
Veterans Drive 12" Water Line
Detailed Description
Install approximately 1,900 feet of 12" water line south of Walnut on Veterans Drive.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
1,900
LF
$80
152,000
2
Fire Hydrant
4
EA
$3,200
12,800
3
16" Gate Valve with Box
4
EA
$10,000
40,000
4
12" Gate Valve with Box
2
EA
$2,000
4,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
4
EA
$900
3,600
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
7
Trench Safety
1,900
LF
$2
3,800
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
4
TN
$4,500
18,000
9
12" WL Creek Crossing
200
LF
$140
28,000
SUBTOTAL: $292,200
ENG/SURVEY 15% $43,900
SUBTOTAL: $336,100
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $32,000
SUBTOTAL: $368,100
CONTINGENCY 25% $92,100
SUBTOTAL: $460,200
PROJECT TOTAL $460,200
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP ratNICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBAI3LE COST May 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
I 3
1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Riley Rd. & Kirby Dr.
Detailed Description
A 1 million gallon composite elevated storage tank at Riley Rd. & Kirby Dr.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
1.0 MG EST (Composite Tank)
1
LS
$2,000,000
2,000,000
2
Foundation
1
LS
$200,000
200,000
3
Site Work
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
4
Piping
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
SUBTOTAL.: $2,450, 000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $367,500,
SUBTOTAL: $2, 817, 500
CONSTRUCTION MGMI 9.5% $267,700
SUBTOTAL: $3, 085, 200
CONTINGENCY 25% $771,300
SUBTOTAL: $3,856,500
PROJECT TOTAL $3,856,500
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
ITI7LNICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
May 2013
Construction Project Number
4
Project Description
CR 94 12" Water Line
Detailed Description
Install approximately 5,300 feet of 12-inch water line from Hughes Ranch Rd/CR403 to just north of FM
518/Broadway.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
5,300
LF
$80
424,000
2
Fire Hydrant
11
EA
$3,200
35,200
3
12" Gate Valve with Box
5
EA
$2,000
10,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
11
EA
$900
9,900
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$20,000
20,000
6
Trench Safety
5,300
LF
$2
10,600
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
8
TN
$4,500
36,000
SUBTOTAL: $545, 700
ENG/SURVEY 15% $81,900
SUBTOTAL: $627, 600
CONSTRUCTION MGMI 9.5% $59,700
SUBTOTAL: $687, 300
CONTINGENCY 25% $171,900
SUBTOTAL: $859,200
PROJECT TOTAL $859,200
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction Project Number
11NICHOLS
FREESE
Ma) 2013
5
Project Description
FM 521 16" Water Line
Detailed Description
Install approximately 7,500 feet of 16-inch water line along Almeda Rd/FM 521 from Broadway to Mooring Pointer Dr.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
7,30D
LF
$105
766,500
2
Fire Hydrant
14
EA
$3,200
44,800
3
16" Gate Valve with Box
4
EA
$10,000
40,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
14
EA
$900
12,600
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$30,000
30,000
6
Trench Safety
7,300
LF
$2
14,600
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
15
TN
$4,500
67,500
8
16" WL Creek Crossing
200
LF
$190
38,000
SUBTOTAL:
$1, 014, 000
ENG/SURVEY
15% $152,100
SUBTOTAL:
$1,166,100
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5% $110,600
SUBTOTAL:
$1, 276, 900
CONTINGENCY
25% $319,300
SUBTOTAL:
$1,596,200
PROJECT TOTAL
$1,596,200
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP IF
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
FREESE
NICHOLS
May 2013
Construction Project Number1
6
Project Description
Fellows Loop 12" Water Line
Detailed Description
Install approximately 14,400 feet of 12-inch water line to loop from the termination of the existing waterline along the
feeder road of BW 8 along Fellows to Cullen and terminating at Hawk Rd.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
13,300
LF
$80
1,064,000
2
Fire Hydrant
30
EA
$3,200
96,000
3
12" Gate Valve with Box
12
EA
$2,000
24,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
30
EA
$900
27,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
6
Trench Safety
13,300
LF
$2
26,600
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
30
TN
$4,500
135,000
8
12" Boring and Casing
600
LF
$300
180,000
9
12" WL Creek Crossing
500
LF
$140
70,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,722,600
ENG/SURVEY 15% $258,400
SUBTOTAL: $1,981,000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $188,200
SUBTOTAL: $2,169,200
CONTINGENCY 25% $542,300
SUBTOTAL: $2,711,500
PROJECT
TOTAL $2,711,500
OPINION
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
•1• NICHOLS
May 2013
OF PROBABLE COST
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
I 7
Surface Water Treatment Plant (Phase 1)
Detailed Description
Design and construction of a 10 MGD surface water treatment plant with room to expand to 20 MGD.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
Site Civil
1
LS
$2,007,000
2,007,000
2
Raw Water Intake Structure
1
LS
$2,529,000
2,529,000
3
Raw Water Pump Station
1
LS
$1,109,000
1,109,000
4
Raw Water Pipeline
1
LS
$159,000
159,000
5
Conventional Treatment Processes
1
LS
$2,463,000
2,463,000
6
GAC Filters
1
LS
$2,121,000
2,121,000
7
Microfiltration Membrance Unit
1
LS
$7,823,000
7,823,000
8
Ozone System
1
LS
$3,394,000
3,394,000
9
Chemical Feed System
1
LS
$2,796,000
2,796,000
10
Backwash Waste Water Lagoon & Pump Station
1
LS
$3,564,000
3,564,000
11
High Service Pump Station
1
LS
$1,070,000
1,070,000
12
Clearwell
1
LS
$1,749,000
1,749,000
13
Electrical and Instrumentation & Control
1
LS
$6,912,000
6,912,000
14
Yard Piping
1
LS
$5,655,000
5,655,000
SUBTOTAL:
$43, 351, 000
ENG/SURVEY
15% $6,502,7001
SUBTOTAL:
$49, 853, 700
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5% $4,736,200
SUBTOTAL:
$ 54, 589, 900
CONTINGENCY
25% $13,647,500
SUBTOTAL:
$68,237,400
PROJECT TOTAL
$68,237,400
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBABLE; COST
FREESE
r7',NICHOLS
2013
=
May
Construction Project Number
1
8
Project Description
FM 1128 16" Water Line
Detailed Description
Install approximately 5,300 feet of 16-inch water line along FM 1128 (Manvel Rd) from Bailey Rd to CR 100.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
5,100
LF
$105
535,500
2
16" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$350
35,000
3
Fire Hydrant
11
EA
$3,200
35,200
4
16" Gate Valve with Box
3
EA
510,000
30,000
5
6" Gate Valve with Box
11
EA
$900
9,900
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$22,500
22,500
7
Trench Safety
5,100
LF
$2
10,200
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
9
TN
$4,500
40,500
9
16" WL Creek Crossing
200
LF
$190
38,000
SUBTOTAL:
$756, 800
ENGISURVEY
15%
$113,600
SUBTOTAL:
$870,400
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5%
$82,700
SUBTOTAL:
$953,100
CONTINGENCY
25%
$238,300
SUBTOTAL:
$1,191,400
PROJECT TOTAL
$1,191,400
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
�1 :NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction Project Number
j
May 2013
9
Project Description
CR 100 16" Water Line
Detailed Description
Install approximately 13,200 feet of 16-inch water line along CR100 from Veterans Dr. to FM 1128 (Manvel Rd).
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
13,000
LF
$105
1,365,000
2
Fire Hydrant
27
EA
$3,200
86,400
3
16" Gate Valve with Box
9
EA
$10,000
90,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
27
EA
$900
24,300
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$56,000
56,000
6
Trench Safety
13,000
LF
$2
26,000
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
23
TN
$4,500
103,500
8
16" WL Creek Crossing
200
LF
$190
38,000
SUBTOTAL:
$1,789,200
ENG/SURVEY
15% $268,400
SUBTOTAL:
$2, 057,600
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5% $195,500
SUBTOTAL:
$2,253,100
CONTINGENCY
25% $563,300
SUBTOTAL:
$2,816,400
PROJECT TOTAL
$2,816,400
OPINION
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
•7<NICHOLS
\gay 2013
OF PROBABLE COST
Construction Project Number
10
Project Description
Harkey Rd & CR 128 12" Water Lines
Detailed Description
Install approximately 13,300 feet of 12-inch water line from Harkey Rd/CR 100 south to CR 128 then east to Veterans
Dr.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
12" WL & Appurtenances
13,300
LF
$80
1,064,000
2
Fire Hydrant
27
EA
$3,200
86,400
3
12" Gate Valve with Box
12
EA
$2,000
24,000
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
27
EA
$900
24,300
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$56,000
56,000
6
Trench Safety
13,300
LF
$2
26,600
7
Ductile Iron Fittings
23
TN
$4,500
103,500
SUBTOTAL: $1, 384, 800
ENG/SURVEY 15% $207,800
SUBTOTAL: $1,592,600
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $151,300
SUBTOTAL: $1,743, 900
CONTINGENCY 25% $436,000
SUBTOTAL: $2,179,900
PROJECT TOTAL $2,179,900
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
OPINION OF PROBAI3LE COST
FREESE
•1NICHOLS
Mal. 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number1
11
Veterans Drive 12" & 16" Water Line - Bailey Rd to CR 128
Detailed Description
Install approximately 5,300 feet of 16-inch water line on Veterans Dr. from Bailey Rd., south to CR 100 and continue
an additional 5,300 feet of 12-inch water line on Veterans Dr. from CR 100 south to CR 128.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
16" WL & Appurtenances
5,100
LF
$105
535,500
2
16" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$350
35,000
3
12" WL & Appurtenances
5,200
LF
$80
416,000
4
Fire Hydrant
22
EA
$3,200
70,400
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
6
EA
$56,000
336,000
6
12" Gate Valve with Box
6
EA
$2,000
12,000
7
6" Gate Valve with Box
22
EA
$900
19,800
8
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$44,000
44,000
9
Trench Safety
10,300
LF
$2
20,600
10
Ductile Iron Fittings
18
TN
$4,500
81,000
11
16" WL Creek Crossing
100
LF
$190
19,000
12
12" WL Creek Crossing
100
LF
$140
14,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,603,300
ENG/SURVEY 15% $240,500
SUBTOTAL: $1, 843, 800
CONSTRUCTION MGMI 9.5% $175,200
SUBTOTAL: $2, 019, 000
CONTINGENCY 25% $504,800
SUBTOTAL: $2,523,800
PROJECT TOTAL $2,523,800
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
•9• NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number
Project Description
12
CR 48 North 30" & 20" Water Lines
Detailed Description
Approximately 8,000 feet of 30-inch water line and approximately 5,000 feet of 20-inch water line along CR 48 from
the future water treatment plant to Broadway.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
30" WL & Appurtenances
7,900
LF
$195
1,540,500
2
20" WL & Appurtenances
4,900
LF
$130
637,000
3
Fire Hydrant
26
EA
$3,200
83,200
4
30" Butterfly valve with Box
3
EA
$22,000
66,000
5
20" Butterfly Valve with Box
2
EA
$15,000
30,000
6
6" Gate Valve with Box
26
EA
$900
23,400
7
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$55,000
55,000
8
Trench Safety
12,800
LF
$2
25,600
9
Ductile Iron Fittings
45
TN
$4,500
202,500
10
20" WL Creek Crossing
100
LF
$240
24,000
11
30" WL Creek Crossing
100
LF
$360
36,000
SUBTOTAL: $2, 723, 200
ENG/SURVEY 15% $408,500
SUBTOTAL: $3,131,700
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $297,600
SUBTOTAL: $3, 429, 300
CONTINGENCY 25% $857,400
SUBTOTAL: $4,286,700
PROJECT TOTAL $4,286,700
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP r1 <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction Project Number
\Ian 2013
13
Project Description
CR 59 20" Water Line
Detailed Description
Approximately 10,800 feet of 20-inch water transmission line along CR 59 form CR 94 to CR 48 and approximately
800 feet of 12-inch water line on Kirby Drive, north of CR 59.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
20" WL & Appurtenances
10,500
LF
$130
1,365,000
2
12" WL & Appurtenances
800
LF
$80
64,000
3
20" Boring and Casing
300
LF
$400
120,000
4
Fire Hydrant
24
EA
$3,200
76,800
5
20" Butterfly Valve with Box
7
EA
$15,000
105,000
6
12" Gate Valve with Box
2
EA
$2,000
4,000
7
6" Gate Valve with Box
24
EA
$900
21,600
8
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$48,000
48,000
9
Trench Safety
11,300
LF
$2
22,600
10
Ductile Iron Fittings
30
TN
$4,500
135,000
SUBTOTAL: $1, 962, 000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $294,300
SUBTOTAL: $2, 256, 300
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $214,400
SUBTOTAL: $2,470,700
CONTINGENCY 25% $617,700
SUBTOTAL: $3,088,400
PROJECT TOTAL $3,088,400
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP F1 <NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number
14
Project Description
Far Northwest Water Plant Expansions (Phase 3)
Detailed Description
Installation of a third 1.66 million gallon ground storage tank, a second 15,000 gallon pressure tank, and related
piping and controls.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
1.66 Million Gallon GST
1
LS
$1,250,000
1,250,000
2
15,000 Gallon Pressure Tank
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
3
Yard Piping
1
LS
$75,000
75,000
4
Electrical Controls
1
LS
$50,000
50,000
5
Site Work
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,525,000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $228,800
SUBTOTAL: $1,753,800
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $166,700
SUBTOTAL: $1,920,500
CONTINGENCY 25% $480,200
SUBTOTAL: $2,400,700
PROJECT TOTAL $2,400,700
0
0
0
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
FREESE
IFNI<NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number
1 15
Project Description
Purchase 5 MGD from City of Houston
Detailed Description
Purchase 5 MGD from City of Houston's Southeast Plant.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
Purchase 5 MGD from City of Houston
1
LS
$20,000,000
20,000,000
SUBTOTAL: $20,000,000
ENG/SURVEY Included $0
SUBTOTAL: $20,000,000
CONSTRUCTION MGMT Included $0
SUBTOTAL: $20,000,000
CONTINGENCY 10% $2,000,000
SUBTOTAL: $22,000,000
PROJECT TOTAL $22,000,000
City of Pearland
FREESE
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP •7:NICHOLS
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST May 2013
Construction Project Number 1 16
Project Description
0.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank at Garden Road Water Plant
Detailed Description
A 500,000-gallon elevated storage tank at the Garden Road Water Plant.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
500,000 Gallon Elev. Storage
1
LS
$875,000
875,000
2
Foundation
1
LS
$100,000
100,000
3
Site Work
1
LS
$25,000
25,000
4
Piping
1
LS
$25,000
25,000
5
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$20,000
20,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,045,000
ENG/SURVEY 15% $156,800
SUBTOTAL: $1,201,800
CONSTRUCTION MGMI 9.5% $114,200
SUBTOTAL: $1,316,000
CONTINGENCY 25% $329,000
SUBTOTAL: $1,645,000
PROJECT TOTAL $1,645,000
OPINION
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIP
111101
FREESE
<NICHOLS
M721v 2013
OF PROBABLE COST
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
17
Bailey Road 24" Water Line - Veterans Drive to FM 1128
Detailed Description
Approximately 14,100 feet of 24-inch water line along Bailey Road from Veterans Drive to FM 1128, 1,100 feet of 16-
inch water fine along Harkey Road, and 1,100 feet of 12-inch water line along McClean Road.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1
24" WL & Appurtenances
14,000
LF
$160
2,240,000
2
16" WL & Appurtenances
1,100
LF
$105
115,500
3
12" WL&Appurtenances
1,100
LF
$80
88,000
4
24" Boring and Casing
100
LF
$450
45,000
5
24" Butterfly Valve with Box
10
EA
$18,000
180,000
6
Fire Hydrant
33
EA
$3,200
105,600
7
6" Gate Valve with Box
33
EA
$900
29,700
8
12" Gate Valve with Box
2
EA
$2,000
4,000
9
16" Gate Valve with Box
2
EA
$10,000
20,000
10
16" T.S. & Valve
1
EA
$17,000
17,000
11
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$75,000
75,000
12
Trench Safety
16,200
LF
$2
32,400
13
Ductile Iron Fittings
70
EA
$4,500
315,000
SUBTOTAL: $3,267,200
ENGISURVEY 15% $490,100
SUBTOTAL: $3,757,300
CONSTRUCTION MGMT 9.5% $357,000
SUBTOTAL: $4,114, 300
CONTINGENCY 25% $1,028,600
SUBTOTAL: $5,142,900
PROJECT TOTAL $5,142,900
City of Pearland
Water 2012 Impact Fee CIF
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
FREESE
9• NICHOLS
May 2013
Construction
Project Description
Project Number
18
Bailey Road 24" Water Line - FM 1128 to CR 48
Detailed Description
Approximately 30,500 feet of 24-inch water line along Bailey Road extending from FM 1128 to CR 48.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT
PRICE TOTAL
1
24" WL & Appurtenances
29,500
LF
$160
4,720,000
2
24" Boring and Casing
500
LF
$450
225,000
3
Fire Hydrant
61
EA
$3,200
195,200
4
6" Gate Valve with Box
61
EA
$900
54,900
5
24" Butterfly Valve with Box
15
EA
$18,000
270,000
6
Site Clearing & Restoration
1
LS
$150,000
150,000
7
Trench Safety
29,500
LF
$2
59,000
8
Ductile Iron Fittings
75
TN
$4,500
337,500
9
24" WL Creek Crossing
500
LF
$290
145,000
SUBTOTAL:
$6,156,600
ENG/SURVEY
15% $923,500
SUBTOTAL:
$7,080,100
CONSTRUCTION MGMT
9.5% $672,700
SUBTOTAL:
$7,752, 800
CONTINGENCY
25% $1,938,200
SUBTOTAL:
$9,691,000
PROJECT TOTAL
$9,691,000
0
0
0
LWE OAK
DALLAS RD
JASMINE
m
ERGREEN
JASMINE
PAL
W 8 ALMEDA
BLUEBONNET DR
SOUTH DR BLUEBONNET DR
s$ o
c
Ip S V' FM
FOURT
1 $•' 24" _24"
Ili
l l h
II
c 111,
f-
L 1t
III
kir
-rs
it
m II
II
// rR564A
- rr
Far Northwest WWTP
Permitted Capacity = 2.0 MGD
used 2.0 MG Expansion (,
>osed 2.0 MG Expansion (20 .
CR 895
CR 694
42" 42'
li
i _ Beltway 8 and State Highway 288
Sewerlmproe
Southdown WWTP
Permitted Capacity = 0.95 MGD
Proposed 1.0 MGD Expansio;
and Replacement (2022)
SUMMERWIND CT -
5P11ESIO!
0" 30'10" F.M.
KILNAR
PAW, IINN'LH
MEADE
CR t9TC_
[J
ILsI
wwm
ww1P
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Existing Impact Fee Eligible
Lift Station
2022 Wastewater Treatment
Plant Improvement
2022 Lift Station
Improvement
2032 Wastewater Treatment
Plant Improvement
2032 Lift Station
Improvement
1 W i Existing Lift Station
FIGURE 4.1
CITY OF PEARLAND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR
WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE, MAY 2013
LEGEND
Existing/In Design Impact Fee
Eligible Wastewater Line
Existing/In Design Impact Fee
Eligible Force Main
2022 Wastewater Line
Improvement
2032 Wastewater Line
Improvement
2032 Force Main
NM
Improvement
Existing Force Main
Existing 8" and Smaller
Wastewater Line
Existing 10" and Larger
Wastewater Line
Street
Railroad
Stream
Index Contour (25 ft)
Intermediate Contour (5 ft)
Lake
Parcel
Outside City Limit
but Inside Service Area
Within City Limit
but Outside Service Area
! City Limit
County Boundary
1 NICHOLS
OAK CREEK
SERVICE AREAS
Barry Rose
Barry Rose & JHEC
Far Northwest
Longwood
MUD 1
Southdown
JHEC
\a
EELLO SPUR
DOGWOOD AME
ANRYA'VF..
—may''
10" 10"
20" F.M. 20"
r
'State Highway 35 & Industrial
Sanitary .3evvei cilia
itt StM C,,-, SIn.rwenoormoot,
JHEC WWTP
Permitted Capacity = 4.0 MGD
Expansion from •?
Proposed 2.0 MGD
TRIDrE DRI
GRACE U.
S SAM HOUSTON PKWV
4;
JENKINS RD
DARE RO
24" 24" 24"
Barry Rose WWTP
Pemlitted Capacity = 3.1 MGD
CARRIE I. N.
CR 541
NNN
:44
R 291 n16,1
CR 296A.
C&296D
I CR 1280
ti
0
Permitted Capacity = 2.5 MGD
e
2,500
5,000
SCALE IN FEET
reeled By Freese and Ni title, Inc
Jos No. PRL12281
Localism HAW _WO/ _PIANNINGWELIVERABLE9W2_Impect_Fee CIPayFIWre-4.1}WaMmat JF_CIP . FINAL.rmd
Undated: Tuesday. Meath 12. 20131'.33'.25 PM
W JAS
CLEO
PALM
S LOCUST D
PECAN
2022 Water Plant
Improvement
2022 Ground Storage Tank
Improvement
2022 Elevated Storage Tank
Improvement
2032 Well Improvement
2032 Water Plant
Improvement
2032 Ground Storage Tank
Improvement
2032 Elevated Storage Tank
Improvement
Crctled By Freese and NKrd4 Inc.
Job No.. PRL12291
Location'. "\W %NW PLANNINGIDELIVERABLE8102_ImpWLF" CIPs(Fiy re.3.1)-WMer IF CIP . FI
NeSMed. Tuesdc. Marc 12 20191:92:57 PM
SOUTH DR
BLUEDONNET DR _
BLUEBONNET DR
EDA BW 8
12" 12"
RILEY RO
�►�.1 i Proposed 1.0 MG
Elevated Storage Tank
Shadow Creek Water Plant 3.20 MG Ground Storage Tank
(5) - 2,000 GPM Booster Pumps
Proposed Expansion ,
Proposed
Water Treatment Plant
Pit St bilizati:
TR.IL (k'
FIGURE 3.1
CITY OF PEARLAND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR
WATER IMPACT FEE, MAY 2013
LEGEND
Water Plant
Ground Storage Tank
Elevated Storage Tank
ea
Existing/In Design Impact Fee
Eligible Water Line
2022 Water Line
Improvement
2032 Water Line
Improvement
8" and Smaller Water Line
10" and Larger Water Line
Street
Railroad
Stream
Lake
Parcel
Outside City Limit
but Inside Service Area
Country Place Water Plant
0.50 MG Ground Storage Tank
(2) - 1,000 GPM Booster Pumps
(1) - 650 GPM Booster Pump /
f Kirby Water Plant
1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank
1.0 MG Ground Storage Tank
(3) - 1,800 GM Booster Pumps
Within City Limit
but Outside Service Area
City Limit
County Boundary
OAGG RD
EADE
S SAM HOUSTON PKWY
Garden Road Water Plant
0.46 MG Ground Storage Tank
�() (3) - 800 GPM Booster Pumps
Proposed 0.5 MG
Elevated Storage Tank
'Old City Hall Water Plant
0.33 MG Ground Storage Tank
(2) - 500 GPM Booster Pumps
McLean Water Plant
0.50 MG Elevated Storage Tank
0.43 MG Ground Storage Tank
1/4(3) - 600 GPM Booster Pumps
TERRELL 1/
Magnolia Water Plant
0.46 MG Ground Storage Tank
GOLD:' , (3) - 900 GPM Booster Pumps
LESTER GR
Southdown Water Plant
0.50 MG Ground Storage Tank
(3) - 1,000 GPM Booster Pumps
Cullen Blvd. Water Plant
1.00 MG Elevated Storage Tank
0.60 MG Ground Storage Tank
1(3) - 2,100 GPM Booster Pumps,
J I
I__
I
ouTtmrvc KPKWY l
r �_ s
DEL BELLO LN_
CR 100
DEL BELLO SPUR
DOGWOOD AVE
:0
r
Alice Water Plant
0.50 MG Elevated Storage Tank
5.0 MG Ground Storage Tank
(3) - 3,500 GPM Booster Pumps
aed Expansion (203i J
Southeast Water Plant
1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank
1.0 MG Ground Storage Tank
1/4(3) - 2,100 GPM Booster Pumps,
GR 541
Liberty Road Water Plant
0.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank
0.46 MG Ground Storage Tank
(3) - 1,000 GPM Booster Pumps,
CR 281
Green Tee Water Plant
0.21 MG Ground Storage Tank
(2) - 500 GPM Booster Pumps
Marys Creek Water Plante
0.46 MG Ground Storage Tank
(3) - 600 GPM Booster Pumps
Proposed 1.0 MG
Elevated Storage Tank
Proposed Far East Water Pant
and Elevated Storage Tank
CR 129
HA4VKINS
BARBELL RD
2,500
SCALE IN FEET
5,000