Loading...
R75-29 12-22-75RESOLUTION NO. 75-29 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, REAFFIRMING PREVIOUS ACTION AND POSITION TAKEN BY RESOLUTION NO. 37, ADOPTED UNDER DATE OF MAY 22, 1969, ON THE WESTERN ROUTE OF THE ALVIN-HOUSTON EXPRESSWAY. WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Pearland, Texas, on the date of May 22nd, 1969, did duly pass a Resolution wherein they favored the locating and routing of the Alvin -Houston Expressway on the West side of State Highway 35 in and near the City of Pearland, County of Brazoria, State of Texas; and WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Pearland .on the date of this Resolution reaffirms the action taken by Resolution No. 37, and hereby express that they believe that the public interest, service, necessity and welfare can best be served and advanced by recommending to the appropriate State Officials that the location and routing of the Alvin - Houston Expressway should be on the West side of State Highway 35 in and near the•City of Pearland; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the governing body of the City of Pearland, Brazoria and Harris Counties, Texas: That the said City by this action does by these presents reaffirm Resolution No. 37 favoring the locating and routing of the Alvin -Houston Expressway on the West side of State Highway 35 in and near the City of Pearland, Texas PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on this day of ;:1rm.€P/ , A. D. 1975. ATTEST `Gifu Secre Councilman Councilman Mayor Pro Tem i 1 WNI • -- -- � NOTICE dh F FORMA�UBLIC HEA I FTIT OR THE PROPOSED CORRIDOR ANDDESIGN OF STATE HIGHWAY 35 CC 5 i ms CITY OF The Texas State Department of Highways t;RP ;i is Transportation will conduct a public hearing on Thursday, January 8, at 7:30 P.M. in the Pearland High School-C. A. Nelson Auditorium at 2337 North' Galveston Avenue in Pearland for the purpose of discussing alternate routes and designs of the proposed relocation of State Highway 35 between Almeda-Genoa Road in Houston and Spur 409 North of Alvin. The Draft Environmental Impact State- ment for this project is being circulated in ac- cordance with Federal Highway Administration guidelines. At the public hearing, two possible routes will be presented, one east and one westofthe City of Pearland. For either route, the proposed design would provide a fully controlled access freeway on a usual right of way width of 420' with eightmain lanes separated by a 76-foot median from Almeda-Genoa Road to south of F.M.518 and continuing south to Spur 409 with six main lanes divided by a 100-foot median. Diagrammatic layouts, drawings, and exhibits showing the proposed preliminary locations and geometric design along with the Draft Environmen- tal Impact Statement to be displayed at this formal public hearing and any other available in- formation about the proposed project are on file and available for copying at the offices of Mr. Omer F. Poorman, District Engineer, at 7721 Wash- ington Avenue in Houston and Mr. Virgil Schultz, Supervising Resident Engineer, on F.M. 1959 be- tween the Gulf Freeway (I.H. 45) and Old Galves- ton Road (S.H. 3) southeast of Houston. The State's Relocation Assistance Program, the benefits and services for displacees, and infor- mation concerning the relocation assistance of- fice will be discussed. Tentative schedules for right of way acquisition and construction will be discussed. All interested citizens are invited to attend this public hearing. Written statements and other exhibits may be submitted to Mr. Omer F. Poorman, District Engineer, P. 0. Box 1386, Houston, Texas, 77001, but must be received no later than 10 days after the public hearing to become part of the official transcript. tcrEi i�Y • ALMEDA-GENOA RD ROOKSIDE: ILLAGE J � PP"{.ill -;WEST ROUTE; nr • •• \, • A .: : • •/ •••' • • • • • r ALVIN • EAST ROUTE ••• # 40EgR� Cflujo1 o ©©rrll© d Z TEXAS P. O. Box 2068 • Pearland, Texas 77588-2068 . 485-2411 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AT 1 : 00 P.M. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1990, IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3519 LIBERTY DRIVE, THERE WILL BE A GENERAL DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE ROUTING OF THE NEW HWY 35 THROUGH THE CITY OF PEARLAND INTO THE CITY OF ALVIN. MEMBERS OF THE PEARLAND CITY COUNCIL, ALVIN CITY COUNCIL, MANVEL CITY COUNCIL AND BROOKSIDE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE IN ATTENDANCE. POSTED: 7 — REMOVED: g' 2' 90 COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWA ENGINEER-DIRECTOR REAGAN HOUSTON. CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTAT � B. L. DEBERRY DEWITT C GREER P. O. Box 1386 CHARLES E. SIMONS Houston, Texas 77001 January 21 , 1976 CITY OF Brazoria & Harris Counties PE ..g;:PAD. S.H. 35 : From Almeda-Genoa Road in Houston IN REPLY REFER To To Spur 409 in Alvin FILE NO Control 178-9 & 10 IPE's 271 & 273 Mr. William E. Wolff City Manager City of Pearland P. O. Box 1157 Pearland, Texas 77581 Dear Sir : This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of recent date concerning the proposed State Highway 35 within the above limits . We appreciate your interest , and your comments will be made a part of our records covering this project and will be reviewed as we continue our studies . Very truly yours , Omer F. Poorman District Engineer District No. 12 /► MR. EXAMINER : I AM CARLTON MCCOMB, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS . IT APPEARS THAT WE ARE ONCE AGAIN GATHERED TO TRY AND RESOLVE THE LOCATION OF THE ALVIN-HOUSTON EXPRESSWAY. ON PAGE ONE OF THE T. H.D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, YOU STATE THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITY IS TO "IMPROVE TRAFFIC SERVICE BETWEEN ALVIN AND HOUSTON . " As A CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITY, THIS PROPOSED ROAD IS NOT LIKE THE ONE CONSTRUCTED THROUGH ALVIN IN THAT IT HAS BEEN DESIGNED WITHOUT ACCESS ROADS . WITHOUT THESE ACCESS ROADS, THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS WILL HAVE NO OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP THEIR LAND AS "COMMERCIAL TRACTS" SERVICED WITH "FREEWAY" ACCESS . IN 1960 WHEN THE T. H .D. BEGAN ITS PRELIMINARY PLANNING OF THIS FACILITY, THE POPULATION OF ALVIN, TEXAS WAS 5,643 AND THE CITY OF PEARLAND WAS JUST A WIDE SPOT IN THE ROAD WITH A POPULATION OF 1,497, AT THE TIME OF THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING IN 1967, THE POPULATION OF ALVIN WAS APPROXIMATELY 10,200, WHILE THE POPULATION OF PEARLAND HAD GROWN TO APPROXIMATELY 5,000 PEOPLE . TODAY THE ESTIMATED POPULATION OF ALVIN IS 14,000, AND THE ESTIMATED POPULATION OF PEARLAND IS 9,500. THE POINT IS, THAT MANY COMMUNITY CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED SINCE 1960, AND EVEN MORE SINCE 1967, OUR COMMUNITY IS GROWING AT A PHENOMENAL RATE. IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS OVER $12,000,000, 00 IN NEW CONSTRUCTION HAS OCCURRED IN OUR CITY AND MUCH OF THE LAND WHICH WAS UNDEVELOPED IN 1960 AND 1967 IS NOW COMMERCIALLY, INDUSTRIALLY, AND RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THE DESIGN OF THE FACILITY THROUGH PEARLAND IS BASED ON THE NEEDS OF 1960 AND NOT 1980, BEING MAYOR OF A MAJOR GROWTH CENTER IS DIFFICULT ENOUGH WITHOUT HAVING TO COPE WITH THE ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS OF A NEW MAJOR ROAD FACILITY WITH DESIGNED OBSOLESCENCE. BOND FUNDS WHICH WERE AVAILABLE FOR LAND PURHCASE SIX AND ONE-HALF YEARS AGO ARE STILL AVAILABLE BUT THE COST OF THE LAND HAS INCREASED TO SUCH AN EXTENT THAT THIS AVAILABLE AMOUNT IS NO LONGER ADEQUATE, AND BEFORE THE ALVIN-HOUSTON EXPRESSWAY CAN BECOME A REALITY, ADDITIONAL FUNDS WILL HAVE TO BE VOTED. NOT ONLY FOR LAND PURCHASE, BUT PLSO FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE FAMILIES AND BUSINESSES LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CORRIDOR. I WOULD NOW LIKE TO COMMENT ON WHAT OUR CITY COUNCIL FEELS IS THE BEST FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND. * (READ RESOLUTION No. 75-29) . OUR DECISION FAVORING THE WESTERLY ROUTE WAS PREDICATED UPON THE FOLLOWING FACTS : (1) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL DIVIDE THE CITY OF PEARLAND'S CORPORATE MASS INTO TWO PARTS. (2) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 420 ACRES FROM THE TAX ROLLS OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND. To GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THIS IMPACT, LET US ESTIMATE THAT THIS LAND HAS A MARKET VALUE OF $4,000 PER ACRE. AT OUR CURRENT CITY ASSESSMENT RATIO AND TAX RATE THIS WOULD EQUATE TO A $13,104. 00 PER YEAR MONITARY LOSS - THIS LOSS IS FOREVER. (3) THE EASTERLY ROUTE, AS PRESENTLY DESIGNED, WILL ONLY AFFORD INGRESS AND EGRESS TO OUR CITIZENS AT THREE POINTS IN APPROXIMATELY 4. 5 MILES OF ROAD LENGTH, (4) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL SERIOUSLY AFFECT THE EAST-WEST TRAFFIC FLOW THROUGH OUR CORPORATE LAND MASS BY MAKING ONLY FIVE CROSSINGS AVAILABLE IN 4. 5 MILES OF ROADWAY. (5) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL REQUIRE THE CITY OF PEARLAND TO EXPEND BETWEEN $137,800 AND $369,000 DOLLARS FOR EXISTING UTILITY RELOCATION . AN ESTIMATE WAS PREPARED FOR US BY YOUR DEPARTMENT BY LETTER DATED JUNE 11, 1975. THIS ESTIMATE OFFERS TWO SOLUTIONS TO THE RELOCATION OF OUR 27 INCH MAIN SEWER LINE TO WASTE TREATMENT PLANT No. 2. WE QUESTION THE ADVISABILITY OF PROPOSAL "1" TO FACILITY "4", IN THAT 700 FEET OF LINE WOULD BE INSTALLED WITHOUT ANY ELEVATION DEFERENTIAL. IN ADDITION TO THE LINE RELOCATION DISCUSSED IN THE JUNE 11, ESTIMATE, THE CITY HAS INSTALLED TWO ADDITIONAL SANITARY SEWER LINES ACROSS THE PROPOSED EASTERLY ROUTE WHICH WILL REQUIRE CONSTRUCTION ADJUSTMENTS . I CAN ONLY ASSUME THAT THESE ADDITIONAL COSTS WOULD BE COMPARABLE FOR LIKE SIZE LINES MENTIONED IN THE ESTIMATE. (6) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL REQUIRE THE CITY OF PEARLAND TO EXPEND AN UNDETERMINED SUM FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER CROSSINGS - 2 - Ammik ACROSS THE FREEWAY ROUTE IN ANTICIPATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNIMPROVED LAND. THE SIZING AND LOCATION OF THESE LINES WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE AT THE PRESENT TIME . (7) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL REQUIRE A MAJOR REVISION TO THE CITY'S LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN . (8) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL REQUIRE THAT PEOPLE, LIVING IN THE UN-INCORPORATED AREAS WEST OF PEARLAND, UTILITZE, TO EVEN A GREATER EXTENT, THE OVERLOADED STREETS AND ROADWAYS LEADING FROM WEST TO EAST. (9) THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL, ACCORDING TO YOUR DESIGN, REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ADDITIONAL OVERPASSES OVER HWY 35 AND THE SANTA FE RAILWAY TRACKS NORTH AND SOUTH OF PEARLAND. THE EASTERLY ROUTE WILL COST AN ADDITIONAL TEN MILLION DOLLARS ACCORDING TO YOUR ESTIMATES EXPRESSED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. LET ME BE THE FIRST TO AGREE THAT OUR CITY NEEDS RELIEF FROM THE DEPLORABLE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ON STATE HWY 35, THE PEARLAND CITY COUNCIL, THE BRAZORIA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT AND THE BRAZORIA COUNTY CITIES ASSOCIATION ARE ON RECORD AS FAVORING THE WESTERLY ROUTE. THE TEXAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION AGREED WITH THE PEARLAND CITY COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSIONERS COURT THAT THE WESTERLY ROUTE WAS THE MORE DESIRABLE OF THE TWO. THE CONCURRENCE IS EXPRESSED IN A TEXAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION MINUTE ORDER No, 63415 IN FEBRUARY OF 1970. THIS MINUTE ORDER IS STILL IN EFFECT AT THIS TIME. I AM SURE THAT AFTER YOUR REVIEW OF THE ABOVE LISTED FACTS AS THEY RELATE TO THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF NORTH BRAZORIA COUNTY, THAT YOU ALSO WILL AGREE THAT THE PLACEMENT OF THE PROPOSED EXPRESSWAY WEST INSTEAD OF EAST OF PEARLAND IS TRULY IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE WE SERVE . - 3 - TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION TEXAS 77843 TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PARTICIPATION SURVEY The Texas Transportation Institute, in cooperation with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and the Federal Depart- ment of Transportation, is conducting a study of public participation in transportation planning. We are trying to learn more about involving the public in future transportation projects, and to do this, we need first-hend information from people like yourself. Please fill out this questionnaire at your earliest convenience and mail it in the attached stamped, self-addressed envelope. Your responses will be treated confidentially. We greatly appreciate your considerate cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact: Dr. Michael Weiss Texas A&M University Texas Transportation Institute College Station, Texas 77843 1 . How many highway hearings have you attended? 0 [] 1 [] 2 [] 3 [] 4 [] 5 or more [] 2. If you have attended one or more highway hearings, have you usually favored the project(s)? Yes [] No [] 3. Have you spoken at a highway hearing? Yes [] No [] 4. How did you find out about the highway hearing(s) you attended? (Check all that apply) Highway Hearings [] Highway Department Handouts [] Radio [] Newspapers [] TV [] A Friend [] Community Meetings [] Direct Mail [] Calls to Highway Department [] Legal Advertisement [] Organization (please give name) Other (please describe) 5. Did you attend this public hearing as a representative of an organization? Yes [] No [] 6. If as a member or representative of an organization, were you an 1 ) Officer [] 2) Board Member [] 3) Committee Chairman [] or 4) Other [] (please describe) 7. Please check reasons for attending hearing: To Listen [] To Make a Statement [] To Ask Questions [] Other (please describe) 8. What other public hearings have you attended? City Council Hearings [] County Commissioners [] Planning and Zoning [] School Board [] Other [] (please describe) None [] 9. How far did you travel to attend the highway public hearing (approximately)? Less than 1 mile [] 1-2 miles [] 2-3 miles [] 3-4 miles [] 4-5 miles [] more than 5 miles [] 10. How well did the Highway Department conduct the hearing? Good [] Fair [] Poor [] Other [] Why? 11 . Have you attended any other meetings concerning the highway project? Yes [] No [] 12. If yes, were representatives from the Highway Department at the meeting? Yes [] No [] 13. How well were the meetings conducted? Good [] Fair [] Poor [] Other [] Why? 14. Please indicate any other activities you took part in that were directly related to this highway project. (Check all that apply. ) Voting [] Sending letters/telegrams [] Phoning people about the project [] Other [] (please describe) 15. What was your feeling about the highway project when you first heard about it? Strongly Approved [] Approved [] Uncertain or No Opinion [] Disapproved [] Strongly Disapproved [] 16. What is your feeling about the project now? Strongly Approved [] Approved [] Uncertain or No Opinion [] Disapproved [] Strongly Disapproved [] 17. Do you believe that you have had any influence on the project plans? Yes [] No [] Don' t Know [] Uncertain [] (please explain) 18. Based on your experience with this highway project, choose one of the answers below and write the corresponding number in the box in front of the question. 1 . I strongly agree 2. I tend to agree 3. I have no opinion 4. I tend to disagree 5. I strongly disagree [ ] The highway project information I have received has been consistent and accurate. [ ] If desired, it has been possible to personally communicate with highway officials about this highway project. [ ] If desired, it has been possible to personally communicate with local officials about this highway project. [ ] If desired, it has been possible to get directly involved in highway project planning. [ ] The public has been well represented by those citizens who are par- ticipating in highway project planning. [ ] Attendance at meetings about this highway project has been small enough to allow everybody to participate, if desired. [ ] It has been possible to determine the progress of this highway project when desired. [ ] Highway officials have been willing to make highway project planning changes when requested by citizens. [ ] Local , elected officials have been willing to make highway project planning changes when requested by citizens. [ ] The public hearing process has had an influence on the proposed project planning. [ ] There was enough time to prepare for the highway hearing. 19. Occupation (please be specific) 20. Do you own residence [] or rent [] ? 21 . Educational level attained: Finished Grade School [] Finished High School [] Some College [] Finished College [] Graduate or Professional School [] 22. Which of the following applies to you? a. [ ] 1 . My residence is located in project area [ ] 2. My residence is located near project area [ ] 3. My residence is located some distance from project area b. [ ] 1 . I own a business in the project area [ ] 2. I own a business near the project area [ ] 3. I own a business some distance from project area c. [ ] 1 . I am employed in the project area [ ] 2. I am employed near the project area [ ] 3. I am employed some distance from the project area 23. A. Do you live in the city of Pearland or county of Brazoria? Yes [] No [] B. If yes, how many years (approximately)? 24. Are you Male [] or Female [] ? (Continued on other side) 25. What suggestions do you have for conducting public participation efforts in the future? COMMISSION STATE HIGHWAY E`iGIN=ER REAGAN HOUSTON. CHAIRMAN TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT B. L. OF-BERRY DEWITT C. GRFER CHARLES E. SIMONS P. 0. Box 1386 Houston, Texas 77001 June 11, 1975 IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO. • • City of Pearland Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities =0 AID SLLi I4I1C IPE 271 (East Route) State Highway 35 7')' Brazoria Count 75* From Harris County Line to Alvin Hon. Carlton McComb Mayor, City of Pearland P. 0. Box 1157 Pearland, Texas 77581 Dear Sir: As requested of this office in your letter of June 2, 1975, attached is the updated estimate for the relocation of your facilities on the subject project. This estimate is based on the rising cost of material and construction for highway projects - in this District. Should you need any additional information, .please advise. Yours very truly, Omer F. Poorman District Engineer District No. 12 SP/jc Attachment Revised June 11, 1975 Detailed Cost Estimate for the Relocation of the City of Pearland' s Water and Sewer Facilities in conflict with the proposed East Route of SH 35, Alvin Freeway • Facility No. 1 - Six inch transite water line in the right of way of SH 35 north of Pearland. This adjustment will consist of re- placing and lowering approximately 600 feet of 6 . inch transite water line and placing it in. a 10 . inch : 250 wall thickness casing. Material, contract cost and engineering amount to $22. 60 a foot, for a total cost of $13,600.00. Due to being in public right of way, the' costs are not eligible for reimbursement. Facility No. 2 - An 8 inch transite water line in the right of way of Knapp Road. Work accomplished by this adjustment will be to lower approximately 600 feet of 8 inch transite water line and place it in a 12 inch . 250 wall thickness casing across the entire right of way. Material, contract cost and engineering amount to a per foot cost of $32.00, for a total cost of $19,200.00. Due to being in public right of way, this work is not eligible for reimbursement. Facility No. 3 - 10 inch transite water line on private right of way - parallel to FM 518. The work to be done in the course of this adjustment will be to lower and replace the entire crossing placing the 10 inch transite water line in a 16 inch . 250 wall casing. Material, contract cost and engineering amount to $40.00 a foot for a total cost of $111,000.00 for which the cost incurred by this relocation will be reimbursable to the City of Pearland. Facility No. 4 - Proposal No. 1 - 27 inch transite sewer line, gravity flow. This adjustment will comprise of rerouting approximately 700 feet of the 27 inch transite sewer line around the bridge structure- at proposed Hughes Ranch Road. Material, contract cost and engineering are $150.00 a foot or a total adjustment cost of $105,000.00. Facility No. 4 - Proposal No. 2 - 16 inch cast iron pressured crossing encased in a 24 inch . 250 wall casing and a lift station to replace the 27 inch gravity flow sewer line listed in Item 4, Proposal 1 above. The wet well for the lift station will be approximately 10 feet by 12 feet by 25 feet deep and the maximum flow of the 27 inch gravity sewer line would require approximately 4,000 gallons per minute capacity pumps. It will be necessary to encase the 16 inch cast iron line crossing the freeway in that it is a pressured crossing. This adjustment will also consist of laying 1,000 feet of 16 inch cast iron pipe encased in a 22 inch casing at a cost of $41.00 per foot or a total crossing cost of $41,000.00. A lift station to accommodate the 27 inch gravity flow sewer line including labor, material and equipment will be $102,000.00. Engi- neering in the amount of $14, 200.00 which gives a total cost for the lift station and crossing of $157, 200.00. Estimate repairs, replacement and maintenance in the amount of $6,000.00 per year, minimum, times a 30 year life of the entire facility for a total of $180,000.00. Total cost to the City and State at the end of the 30 year life expect- ancy of the lift station $337,200.00, say $337,000.00. Total Re-Cap of Item 4, Proposals 1 and 2. Total cost of the highway crossing adjusted on the basis of replacing the 27 inch main with the lift station based on a 30 year cost is $337,000. 00. Total cost to adjust the 27 inch facility by adding to the existing line and rerouting around the bridge structure at proposed Hughes Ranch Road is $105,000.00 which results in a total difference of $232,000.00. i I .,Afir I .., }r . r • y I} $ .N SII, HOUSTON ; t I,- L? ��; �� ��,t otri Shoes • i. • • - ; Y- X r v m• .+ t } 1 ,i _ _ "w!' COMBINED irliAi • ""':' ""`° °`" Fs r' fu= CORRIDOR (LOCAT ION) AND DES IGN i i• h ALMEDA-GENOA ROAD •• �' 1 Rho \ PUBLIC HEARING • --T1 —;_-.. .1. .. i -i ' , _ , '� $ is i i_ 1 � ` w ,� , for 1%: OM ••••• • • • •• 9r, 1 PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY 35 CLEAR • • `' y• TY ,-- BROOKS IDE S < ..� ,;_'� r� :••• \ As A • _ VILLAGE11 ' 10 ' , , •• ••• *'•,►d.- R7. •• 1 Controlled-Access Divided Highway t >,� : From Almeda Genoa Road In Houston ° ••••...»..qv••• .. .,, ••...•. ,+ •:' :. I I I ;PEARLAND / . •.ti To Spur 409 In Alvin F.,- M. 51 A,44... , �I• In / : ":11 • ' '� Harrisand Brazoria Counties ll ... 1k77 IN!iii « 1 ill :''' ::'*::::: WEST ROUTE •_ '' EAST ROUTE. �F;®®d ***** ***** ***** 4 I •..• a �� Thursday, January 8, 1976 ..• Y�4 ° - - • . ••• Zoa • 104IL r I In the C. A. Nelson Auditorium 1 •r,� / \ •.•• Of the Pearland High School �►c� b'$ "' ...••, .� At 2337 N. Galveston Avenue d'• t••• r° ' Pearland, Texas 1 _ •fs •� ***** ***** ***** • i ••• • i • Alm unni milli mil n uinihy�i mu trtt •• iiti S�nni nuunn -- r •�;•.. x i� ����������' `'' State Department of Highways S. jg. ` iiiiiiiiiiii;;� And Public Transportation 1••.• •�, • •• " '• °`' '' District No. 12 4 Houston, Texas 1 • ••. .N• s c `b \ �ri-v • i o A LV IN , . PROGRAM GENERAL COMMENTS MODERATOR: All interested persons are invited to make a Dale D. Marvel statement . Persons desiring to make a state- District Administrative Engineer ment, either oral or written, are asked to fill out a card at the registration table. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS : The Moderator will call for statements from Richard J. Kabat those who have so indicated on returned cards . District Environmental Coordinator RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EXPLANATION : * * * Darwin Marsh Right of Way Supervisor Written statements and other Exhibits in place PRESENTATION OF PROJECT: of or in addition to oral statements may be George E. Kishi submitted at the Public Hearing or submitted Senior Designing Engineer to Mr. Omer F. Poorman, District Engineer, P. O. Box 1386 , Houston, Texas , 77001 , but must be received not later than January 19, 1976 . RECESS * * At anytime after this public hearing, all OPPORTUNITY TO STUDY DISPLAYS information developed will be available for in- spection and copying at the office of Mr . Omer F. ASSISTING WITH DISPLAYS : Poorman, District Engineer, 7721 Washington Avenue in Houston, Texas . Dennis J. Mlcak Steven J. Wong Chris M. Barnes I. O. Villarreal * * * James J. Wong George E. Kishi PLEASE REGISTER YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AT THE REGISTRATION DESK. RECONVENE TO RECEIVE STATEMENTS FROM THE FLOOR