2000-07-31 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTEStos t
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PEARLAND, TEXAS, HELD ON JULY 31, 2000, AT 6:30 P.M., IN THE COUNCIL
CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 3519 LIBERTY DRIVE, PEARLAND, TEXAS.
The meeting was called to order with the following present:
Mayor
Mayor Pro -Tem
Councilmember
Councilmember
City Manager
City Attorney
City Secretary
Tom Reid
Klaus Seeger
Woody Owens
Larry Marcott
Glen Erwin
Darrin Coker
Young Lorfing
Absent: Councilmembers Helen Beckman and Larry Wilkins.
Others in attendance: Deputy City Manager Alan Mueller; Manager of Administrative
Support Tobin Maples; City Engineer John Hargrove; Finance Director Jim Causey
Assistant City Attorney Nghiem Doan.
PURPOSE OF THE MEETING:
Mayor Reid with concurrence of Council moved to Item No. 3, which is the First and Only
Reading of Ordinance No. 981.
FIRST AND ONLY READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 981 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AND ORDERING THE
ISSUANCE OF CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT
REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2000; PRESCRIBING THE TERMS AND FORM
THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL THEREOF AND
INTEREST THEREON; AWARDING THE SALE THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE
PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO BE USED IN
CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF THE BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF
BOND INSURANCE; MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS REGARDING SUCH BONDS,
INCLUDING USE OF THE PROCEEDS THEREOF, AND MATTERS INCIDENT
THERETO; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BECAUSE THE NEED TO THE
BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC AND, THEREFORE, BEARS DIRECTLY UPON THE HEALTH,
SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENRY. Mr. Jim Causey, Director of Finance.
Councilmember Owens made the motion, seconded by Councilmember Mayor Pro -Tem
Seeger to approve Ordinance No. 981 on its first and only reading.
Page 1 of 6 - 7/31/2000
007
Frank Ildebrando, Dane Rauscher, City Financial Advisor, addressed Council and stated
as discussed in the past this ordinance is for the refinancing of certain bonds that the City
has outstanding. The proposed ordinance will allow the refunding of existing Certificates
of Obligation (1990,1991, and 1992), in orderto realize a present value savings from lower
interest rates. The new bonds will be placed with Chase Bank of Houston, upon, which a
portion of the proceeds will be invested in certain securities and applied to the payments
of principal and interest on the refunded bonds. The amount of the refunded bonds is
1990 Certificates of Obligation $10,000,000,1991 Certificates of Obligation $810,000 and
the 1992 Improvement Bonds $1,075,000 for a total of $11,885,000. Mr. Ildebrando gave
a detailed presentation regarding the Permanent Improvement Refunding Bonds Series
2000. He stated that the current fiscal year, the City will save $332,993, and $6,913 next
year, then three years of approximately $220,000 each, and the total expenditure to the
City for the sale of the bonds is approximately $200,000. The overall savings on the bonds
is $1,015,203, after all expenses are paid on these transactions.
Additional discussion ensued between Council and the City Financial Advisor regarding the
details of the sale of the bonds.
Voting "Aye" Councilmembers Owens, Seeger, and Marcott.
Voting "No" None.
Motion Passed 3 to 0, with Councilmembers Beckman and Wilkins absent.
COUNCIL ACTION - PRESENTATION OF 2000 CERTIFIED APPRAISAL ROLL FOR
THE CITY OF PEARLAND AND ASSOCIATED NEW CONSTRUCTION VALUE. Mr. Jim
Causey, Finance Director.
Mayor Pro -Tem Seeger made the motion, seconded by Councilmember Owens, to accept
the 2000 Certified Appraisal Roll for the City of Pearland and associated new construction
value.
Finance Director, Jim Causey stated that the City has received the Certification of the 2000
Appraisal Roll for the City of Pearland for the Council's acceptance. Mr. Causey stated
that the numbers are substantially larger than last year. The taxable value for the 2000
Appraisal Roll is $1,524,504,879, estimated Taxable value for the 2000 Supplemental Roll
is $46,208,808, the Net Taxable value is $1,570,713,687.
Councilmember Marcott asked if the increase in value is due to the construction new
homes?
Page 2 of 6 - 7/31/2000
Finance Director, Jim Causey, stated that the Chief Appraiser does not have that break
down yet, but he suspects that it is due to the new home construction. He further stated
when he gets that report in, he will forward a copy to Council.
Councilmember Owens asked what the City had last year?
Finance Director, Jim Causey, reported that the value was approximately $1,321,000,000
Additional discussion ensued between Council and Mr. Causey regarding the amount of
property value that is being protested by taxpayers and various other areas of the property
values such as mobile homes, personal property, and tax abatements.
Voting "Aye" Councilmembers Marcott, Seeger, and Owens.
Voting "No" None.
Motion Passed 3 to 0, with Councilmembers Beckman and Wilkins absent.
FIRST AND ONLY READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 979 -AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, ADDING SECTION 30-103 TO
CHAPTER 30 OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND CODE OF ORDINANCES, AS THE SAME
MAY HAVE BEEN, FROM TIME TO TIME, AMENDED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROVIDING FOR THE RECONCILIATION OF THE TERMS OF A STRATEGIC
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTAND RELATED AGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPERS
OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION WITH THE
CITY CODE AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS RELATED THERETO; HAVING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A REPEALER
CLAUSE, AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND
FOR CODIFICATION; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BECAUSE THE NEED TO
MAINTAIN ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF LAND INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF THE
PUBLIC AND, THEREFORE, BEARS DIRECTLY UPON THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND
WELFARE OF THE CITIZENRY. Mr. Darrin Coker, City Attorney.
Councilmember Marcott made the motion, seconded by Councilmember Owens, to
approve Ordinance No. 979 on its first and only reading.
City Attorney, Darrin Coker, stated this item is related to the Friendswood Development
Agreement the City recently entered into with Lennar Homes, Inc. for development of a
residential community in the City's ETJ (Highway 6 at FM 521 vicinity). As part of the
agreement, the City agreed to a strategic partnership agreement, which determines the
conditions of development, which includes, but are not limited to lot sizes, yard setbacks,
Page 3 of 6 - 7/31/2000
404 -
and size of streets. Because certain development standards, as identified in the
development agreement, will deviate from existing City criteria, it is necessary to pass an
ordinance indicating that the terms of a strategic partnership agreement entered into
pursuant to Section 4.0751, of the Texas Local Government Code, shall govern when
conflict with the City arises.
Deputy City Manager, Alan Mueller, stated that this is a recommendation from our attorney,
Charles Williams. The general statement is that an agreement cannot supercede an
ordinance, and keeps us procedurally in check.
Councilmember Owens asked about the eaves?
Deputy City Manager, Alan Mueller, reported that eaves are limited to 18", and in the text
of the land use agreement.
Councilmember Marcott asked why does this ordinance have to be passed as an
emergency?
City Attorney, Darrin Coker, stated that because this is a special meeting the City Charter
does not allow us to pass an ordinance at a special meeting unless it is declared an
emergency and read-only once.
Councilmember Marcott asked if there need for this to be an emergency?
City Attorney, Darrin Coker, stated that it is important the we get this passed. Ideally, this
would have been on the same agenda as the development agreement, however, it was not
ready at that time. He further stated that there is not a set standard for declaring an
emergency reading. The City Council can declare, if the body deems it an emergency, it
can be passed as an emergency.
Voting "Aye" Councilmembers Seeger and Owens.
Voting "No" Councilmember Marcott.
Motion Passed 2 to 1, with Councilmembers Beckman and Wilkins absent.
FIRST AND ONLY READING OF ORDINANCE NO.980 -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES
NECESSARYTO PROPERLY IMPLEMENT AND ENFORCE THE CITY OF PEARLAND'S
EMERGENCY WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN; PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATION; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND A
Page 4 of 6 - 7/31/2000
REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, PUBLICATION, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE. Mr. Darrin Coker, City Attorney.
Councilmember Marcott made the motion, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Seeger, to
approve Ordinance No. 980 on its first and only reading, and to amend the ordinance to
reflect a zero dollar amount fined for the first offense.
City Manager, Glen Erwin, stated several years ago the City passed a water conservation
ordinance, and for some reason there was not any type of penalty associated with the non-
compliance of the ordinance. This ordinance will authorize variances for businesses and
nurseries and such as that.
City Attorney, Darrin Coker, stated the penalties kick in at the time that a moderate
condition is declared and then ultimately a severe condition declared. Mr. Coker further
stated under the duties of the City Manager, when the usage levels reach 95% of the
capacitythen the City Manager shall declare a moderate condition and shall implement the
apporiate measures as identified in the ordinance. So, once the threshold is met to
implement the penalties. Mr. Coker further explained the methods by which the City will
contact the water users. He also explained the penalty end of the ordinance is $100 for
the first occurrence and each subsequent penalty shall be punishable by $500.
Councilmember Owens stated that he would rather see a warning issued for the first
violation. He also commented that the residents may not also know that a penalty is in
effect, because of the lack of the communication.
Mayor Pro -Tem Seeger stated that he also likes the idea of a warning the first time.
Assistant City Attorney, Nghiem Doan stated that in lieu of giving a warning, assess a small
fine so that the municipal court will be able to track the offenders. A warning is difficult to
administer.
Lengthy discussion ensued between Council and Staff regarding the penalty and the
administration and the enforcement of the penalty, and the various ways the residents
could be notified at the time penalty is in effect.
Stella Roberts asked will the City also have to adhere to the regulations of the ordinance
during a period of time that water is being conserved.
City Attorney, Darrin Coker, stated that the City will be regulated like everyone else and
during severe conditions no water is allowed for City parks or grounds.
Page 5 of 6 - 7/31/2000
ft0F
Deputy City Manager, Alan Mueller reported that Staff is working on additional revisions
to the water conservation ordinance, basically this adopting the language that was passed
in the resolution for 1996. There are a lot of things in the current ordinance that has to be
addressed.
Additional discussion ensued between Council and Staff regarding the penalty for the first
violation of the ordinance.
Councilmember Marcott stated he feels it would have been apporiate to have some
comments at the last Regular Council Meeting regarding the water situation, if the City was
on a temporary or voluntary reduction. He further stated that it should have been
discussed at the Council Meeting.
Voting "Aye" Councilmembers Seeger and Marcott.
Voting "No" Councilmember Owens.
Motion Passed 2 to 1, with Councilmembers Beckman and Wilkins absent.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Minutes approved as submitted and/or corrected this the 28h day f August, 2000.
Tom Reid
Mayor
ATTEST:
Page 6 of 6 - 7/31/2000