R2003-0137 09-29-03RESOLUTION NO. R2003-137
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND,
TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
ENTER INTO AN ENGINEERING CONTRACT WITH S & B
INFRASTRUCTURE, LTD., FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STATE HWY 35 SOUTH SEWER
PROJECT.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS:
Section 1. That certain contract by and between the City of Pearland and S & B
Infrastructure, Ltd., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part
hereof for all purposes, is hereby authorized and approved.
Section 2. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute
and the City Secretary to attest a contract with S & B Infrastructure, Ltd., for preliminary
engineering services associated with the State Hwy 35 south Sewer Project.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 29th day of
A.D., 2003.
TOM REID
MAYOR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
c�a..._ H. QR—
DARRIN M. COKER
CITY ATTORNEY
September
Exhibit "A"
Resolution No. R2003-137
CITY OF PEARLAND
STANDARD AGREEMENT
FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
This Contract (Contract) is made between the City of Pearland, Texas
(hereinafter "City"), and S&B Infrastructure, LTD. (hereinafter "Engineer") as follows:
1. Summary of Contract Terms. The following information and referenced documents
shall be a part of this Contract:
Description of Project: Provide professional Engineering services for State Hwy 35
South Trunk Sanitary Sewer.
Engineer/Subconsultant(s)
Fee
Basis of Compensation
S&B Infrastructure, LTD.
$74,529.00
Cost Plus/NTE
Maximum Contract Amount
$74,529.00
Cost Plus/NTE
* All financial obligations created by this agreement are between the City an
Engineer, and shall not be construed to be between City and any subconsultant.
Delivery of plans, specifications and estimates: Sixty (60) days from completion of
work.
Attachments: Scope of Services — Exhibit A
2. Services and Payment.
Engineer shall perform services within the Standard of Care of the Engineering
profession as follows:
A. Engineer will furnish services to the City in accordance with the terms and
conditions specified in this Contract. Payment for the services of Engineer shall be due
and payable upon submission and approval of a statement for services to City.
Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly.
After consultation with the City, the Engineer shall specify the basis of
compensation in the scope of work for the project. The Engineer shall provide adequate
detail of the basis of compensation so that the City can determine the reasonableness
of the fees and have the ability to make reasonable progress payments to the Engineer
based upon work completed at the payment intervals. The Engineer shall subcontract
for all subconsultants, subject to City approval, necessary to complete the scope of
work. The subconsultant's fees and administrative mark-up, if any, shall be included in
the scope of work. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the method of compensation shall
be one of the following methods:
i
1. Salary Cost Times Multiplier Plus Direct Nonsalary Expense ("Salary")
Compensation shall be based on 1) the direct salaries (including benefits)
of the Engineer's employees whose time is directly chargeable to the
project; 2) an agreed upon multiplier to compensate the Engineer for
overhead and profit; and 3) reimbursement for direct nonsalary
expenditures and subconsultant contracts as defined in the scope of work
for the project. The Engineer shall provide a proposal that includes the
total fees for the project, which shall not be exceeded without prior City
approval.
2. Per Diem ("Per Diem")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) an agreed upon lump sum per day
for specific services; and 2) reimbursement for direct nonsalary
expenditures and subconsultant contracts as defined in the scope of work
for the project. This method is best suited to expert witness work or other
short-term engagements involving intermittent services.
3. Cost Plus Fixed Fee ("Cost Plus")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) reimbursement of the actual costs
of all services and supplies related to the project and 2) an agreed upon
fixed fee (profit). The Engineer shall provide an estimate of the costs to
be reimbursed, but actual compensation shall be based upon invoices and
supporting documentation provided by the Engineer.
4. Lump Sum ("Lump")
Compensation shall be based upon an agreed lump sum payment for
completing the entire scope of work. This method is best suited to
investigations or studies and for basic services with limited scope and
complexity.
5. Percent of Construction ("Percent")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) the "Harris County Curve for
Engineering Compensation" for basic and construction phase services;
and 2) reimbursement for direct nonsalary expenditures and subconsultant
contracts as defined in the scope of work for the project. The Engineer
shall provide a proposal that includes the estimated construction cost of
the project and the total fees for the project. If the actual low bid for
construction is 20% above or below the estimate, the engineering fees are
subject to equitable adjustment by mutual agreement of the Engineer and
City.
If City fails to make any payment due Engineer for services and expenses within
thirty (30) days after receipt and approval of Engineer's statement for services therefore,
the amounts due Engineer will be increased at the rate of one percent (1%) per month
from said thirtieth (30th) day, and, in addition, Engineer may, after giving seven (7) days'
written notice to City, suspend services under this Contract until Engineer has been paid
in full, all amounts due for services, expenses, and charges.
B. All the Engineer's working drawings, plans, and specifications, if required under
this Contract, shall be sufficiently accurate, detailed, and complete so that competitive
bids for the work can be obtained and the improvements constructed.
C. Approval of the Engineer's work by the City shall not release the Engineer, its
employees, agents, or consultants, from the responsibility and liability for the accuracy
and competency of their designs, working drawings, and specifications, or other
documents and services.
D. Subject to Article 8 herein or as otherwise agreed, the Engineer shall promptly
correct errors in the Engineer's work, including errors discovered after final payment,
without receiving additional compensation.
E. Prior to execution of this agreement, the Engineer shall have prepared a project
schedule identified as an attachment to this agreement. The Project Schedule shall be
submitted in digital and paper form, in the Microsoft Project for Windows format. The
Project Schedule shall contain a complete schedule so that the Engineer's scope of
services under this contract can be accomplished within the specified time and contract
cost. The Project Schedule will provide specific work sequence and definite review
times by the City and the Engineer of the work performed. If the review time should
take longer than shown on the project schedule, through no fault of the Engineer,
additional contract time may be authorized by the City through a supplemental
agreement, if requested by a timely written request from the Engineer and approved by
the City.
3. Term and Termination. This Contract term will begin upon execution and end sixty
days after issuance of the certification of completion of construction by the Engineer.
The City may terminate this Contract at any time during its term by giving written notice
to Engineer. The City shall pay the Engineer for all services rendered to the date of
termination.
4. Modifications. City without invalidating the Contract, may order changes within the
general scope of the work required by the Contract by altering, adding to and/or
deducting from the work to be performed. If any change under this clause causes an
increase or decrease in Engineer's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of
any part of the Services under the Contract, an equitable adjustment will be made by
mutual agreement and the Contract modified in writing accordingly.
3
5. Subcontracts. If, for any reason, at any time during the progress of providing
services, City determines that any subcontractor for Engineer is incompetent or
undesirable, City will notify Engineer accordingly and Engineer shall take immediate
corrective action, which may include cancellation of such subcontract. Subletting by
subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in the
Contract shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and City.
6. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, report data, and other project information
developed in the execution of the services provided under this Contract shall be the
property of the City upon payment of Engineer's fees for services. Engineer may retain
copies for record purposes. Owner agrees such documents are not intended or
represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others. Any reuse by City or by those
who obtained said documents from City without written verification or adaptation by
Engineer will be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engineer, or
to Engineer's independent associates or consultants, and City shall indemnify and hold
harmless Engineer and Engineer's independent associates and consultants from all
claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or
resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle Engineer to further
reasonable compensation. Engineer may reuse all drawings, report data, and other
project information in the execution of the services provided under this Contract in
Engineer's other activities. Any reuse by Engineer will be at Engineer's sole risk and
without liability or legal exposure to City, and Engineer shall indemnify and hold
harmless City from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees
arising out of or resulting therefrom.
7. Insurance.
A. The Engineer shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons, damages to property, or any errors and
omissions relating to the performance of any work by the Engineer, its agents,
employees or subcontractors under this Agreement, as follows:
(1) Workers' Compensation as required by law.
(2) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 in
the aggregate.
(3)
Comprehensive General Liability and Property Damage Insurance with
minimum limits of $1,000,000 for injury or death of any one person,
$1,000,000 for each occurrence, and $1,000,000 for each occurrence of
damage to or destruction of property.
4
(4) Comprehensive Automobile and Truck Liability Insurance covering owned,
hired, and non -owned vehicles, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 for
injury or death of any one person, $1,000,000 for each occurrence, and
$1,000,000 for property damage.
B. The Engineer shall include the City as an additional insured under the policies,
with the exception of the Professional Liability Insurance and Workers' Compensation.
Certificates of Insurance and endorsements shall be furnished to the City before work
commences. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to
the City. Upon request, certified copies of all insurance policies shall be furnished to the
City.
8. Indemnity. Engineer shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents, and
employees, harmless from any claim, loss, damage, suit, and liability of every kind for
which Engineer is legally liable, including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and
attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, for damage to any property, or
errors in design, any of which are caused by the negligent act or omission of the
Engineer, his officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors under this Contract.
9. Assignment. Engineer shall not assign this Contract without the prior written
consent of the City.
10. Law Governing and Venue. This Contract shall be governed by the law of the State
of Texas and no lawsuit shall be prosecuted on this Contract except in a court of
competent jurisdiction located in Brazoria County, Texas.
11. Entire Contract. This Contract represents the entire Contract between the City and
the Engineer and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or contracts, either
written or oral. This Contract may be amended only by written instrument signed by
both parties. Purchase orders issued under this Agreement shall contain a statement
nullifying additional terms and conditions on the reverse side of the purchase order and
referencing this Agreement.
12. Conflicts in Contract Documents. The above provisions shall govern over any
conflicting provision contained in any referenced contract document specified above.
13. Dispute Resolution Procedures. The Engineer and City desire an expeditious
means to resolve any disputes that may arise between them regarding this Contract. To
accomplish this, the parties agree to mediation as follows: If a dispute arises out of or
relates to this Contract, or the breach thereof, and if the dispute cannot be settled
through negotiation, then the parties agree first to try in good faith, and before bringing
any legal action, to settle the dispute by mediation of a third party who will be selected
by agreement of the parties.
5
EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the 29thday of September
CITY OF PEARLAND ENGINEE
By:
Printed Name: Bi 11 Ei sen
Title: City Manager
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF —OR_ z-o
By:
Printed ' ame: 40J. 4• t
Title: eu af.4 of
, 2003
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
I/ e/ _ t #i. , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes
and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS c 9 DAY OF
, A.D., 20 0 3 .
ALA N. LEHMAN
dry Public, State of Texas
rviy Commission Expires:
APRIL 2, 2005
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF //s, 1 S
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF TEXAS //
Printed Name: t/4- .�,
My Commission Expires: Arr1 0 a, 200S'
/� BEF RE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
rIL}P.,Qth R.C.bb iS i1 , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS 7 DAY OF
Cab , A.D., 20 t 3 .
G SEI.A A GONZALEZ
Notary Public: State of Texas
My Cornmissroo Expires 04-25-05
6
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND R T
STATE OF TEXAS
Printed Name: 67Sek 4 -6;51•Mie >-
My Commission Expires: 9-25 --b,c
Mr. Joe Wertz, Jr.
Projects Director
City of Pearland
3519 Liberty Drive, 3`d Floor
Pearland, Texas 77581
Re.:
State Highway 35 South Trunk Sanitary Sewer;
Preliminary Engineering Report
Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
Dear Mr. Wertz:
September 16, 2003
S&B Letter No.: PU-0285.001rr
S&B Project No.: PU-0285
S&B Infrastructure, Ltd. (S&B) is pleased to present this proposal for providing Professional Engineering
Services for the referenced project. S&B proposes to provide "Basic" engineering services as described in
the attached scope of services for the Lump Sum amount of $73,944. S&B further proposes to provide
optional "Additional" engineering and associated services as described in the attached scope of services for
the Cost Plus Not to Exceed (NTE) amount of $585 ($74,529 total). Included with this proposal are the
previously mentioned narrative scope of services and the detailed opinion of engineering cost. Also
included are a preliminary schedule and an order of magnitude construction cost estimate.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to the City of Pearland and look forward to
finalizing the agreement and beginning work. If you have any questions or need more information, please
call me at 713-845-4802.
Sincerely,
Eddie Kirst, P.E.
Deputy Director
Municipal Engineering
encl.
cc: Mr. H.J. Reddish, P.E. — S&B
LEK/dcd
S:\project\pu0285-P1nd-SH35_Trnk SS\admin\ltrs\001rr-cop-sh35-s-per-prop.doc
3535 Sage Road • Houston, Texas 77056-7011.713.845.5401 • Fax 713.993.9301
ATTACHMENT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
State Highway 35 South Trunk Sanitary Sewer;
Preliminary Engineering Report
Pearland, Brazoria County, Texas
GENERAL:
The work to be furnished by S&B Infrastructure, Ltd. (Engineer) under this contract
shall consist of Engineering services required for preparing a preliminary engineering
report for design of State Highway 35 South Trunk Sanitary Sewer. The main trunk
sewer connects to the proposed Magnolia Drive Trunk Sewer and is located along State
Highway 35 with limits from Swensen Road to Cowart Creek. This system also includes
four lateral sewers. The first lateral is located along John Lizer Road from State
Highway 35 to Pearland Parkway. The second lateral is located along the north access
road of Pearland High School from State Highway 35 to Pearland Parkway. The third
and fourth laterals are located east and west of State Highway 35 along Industrial Road.
This sewer project is an integral part of the City of Pearland's (City) master sanitary
sewer plan. These services shall be in accordance with the City's design standards
and in English units.
The Engineer shall furnish all equipment, materials, supplies, and incidentals as
needed to perform the services required.
The Engineer will perform all work efforts and prepare all deliverables in accordance
with the applicable / current requirements of the City's specifications, standards, and
manuals. Whenever possible, the City's standard drawings, standard specifications or
previously approved special provisions and / or special specifications will be used. If a
special provision and / or special specification must be developed for this project, it shall
be prepared in City format and, to the extent possible, incorporate references to
approved City test procedures.
The Engineer will develop and submit a work schedule with milestone activities and/or
deliverables identified Microsoft Project for Windows.
BASIC SERVICES:
Preliminary Phase:
The Engineer shall produce a letter report deliverable recommending location for the
proposed State Highway 35 South Trunk Sewer with horizontal and vertical alignments.
The Engineer shall meet with the City staff at the beginning of the project to determine
the design concepts for the State Highway 35 South Trunk Sewer and the Veterans Lift
Station. The Engineer shall incorporate applicable data obtained from the City's
hydraulic modeling consultants into the cost-effectiveness analysis package. The
Engineer shall provide standards for sanitary sewer planning and provide details for the
Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT "A"
applied engineering approach as a result of planning activities. The Engineer will hold
progress meetings with the City staff at 30% and 90% complete stages to gather and
incorporate comments, and to present 100% documents.
The goal of the Cost -Effectiveness Analysis is to determine the best combination of
gravity sewers, force mains, lift stations, and treatment facilities to provide sanitary
sewerage service to the Veterans Lift Station Sub -basin Area. The following is a list of
anticipated tasks to be provided under basic services:
• With Veterans Lift Station at the intersection of Magnolia Road and Veterans
Drive, evaluate gravity trunk sewer along Magnolia from Veterans to State
Highway 35 and along State Highway from Swensen Road to Cowart Creek,
including laterals. The intent of the study is to eliminate existing lift stations
along each route.
• Define the Veterans Lift Station Service Area sewerage system components
and it's sub -basins. Collect / develop flow criteria for the land use within the
service area. Collect / prepare population projections based on the "Land
Use and Urban Development Ordinance No. 509" and "Wastewater and
SCADA System Master Plan" prepared by Montgomery Watson Harza
(MWH). Determine the existing and ultimate average daily flows (ADF) for
each sub -basin using the City's Zoning Map. Determine the design Inflow /
Infiltration flows for each sub -basin.
• Prepare presentation maps to compare alternatives identifying major cost
components. Identify existing facilities and life -services expectancy based on
TWDB projections and modeling consultants current master plan hydraulic
model. Compare the advantages and disadvantages for each alternative.
• Coordinate with the City's Hydraulic Modeling Consultant to run the agreed
upon alternative.
• Develop a cost-effectiveness workbook using historical information for
alternative components i.e. Gravity Sewers, Force Mains, List Stations and
Treatment Plants. Cost shall include facility, land, operation and
maintenance.
Prepare a letter report comparing the alternatives and make recommendations that
define future development of the sewage system within the Magnolia Service Area.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
The Engineer shall provide additional engineering services as described below:
Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT "A"
Reimbursable Expenses:
The Engineer shall provide courier services, travel for Engineer's personnel to and
from official meetings and the project site, and internal reproductions of plans and
specifications. The total amount for all reimbursable expenses shall not exceed
$585 without prior authorization from the City.
Page 3 of 3
-{11111
ASTRUCTURE, LTD. OPINION OF ENGINEERING COST
ae�.a 6 awwun G rueu�ea.- FOR
State Highway 35 South Trunk Sanitary Sewer; Preliminary Engineering Report
City of Pearland
S&B Project No.: pu0285
Revised: Sep. 15, 2003
DESCRIPTION
Dir/PM
Sr, Eng.
PE
EIT/Dsgn
CADD
Cler
TOTAL
MANHOURS
TOTAL
COST
BASIC SERVICES:
Preliminary Phase, Area 100 (LS):
Coordination with Montgomery Watson
4
4
4
4
4
20
$ 2,172
Project Scope Development and Coord. Meetings
12
64
64
16
16
8
180
$ 20,004
Service Area Definition and Flow Analysis
9
48
48
12
12
6
135
$ 15,003
Preliminary Eval.; Veteran's Trunk Sewer to City Limits
4
16
16
4
4
2
46
$ 5,136
Preliminary Eval.; Veteran's Pump Station
4
16
16
4
4
2
46
$ 5,136
Progress Meeting - Prlm Findings with Cost (30%)
3
3
3
3
1
13
$ 1,464
Model Run
6
32
32
8
8
4
90
$ 10,002
Review Computer Model Results
3
16
16
4
4
2
45
$ 5,001
Sewerage System Cost Analysis
3
8
8
5
2
1
27
$ 2,991
Progress Meeting - Conclusion and Recom (90%)
3
3
3
3
1
13
$ 1,464
Prepare/Present Preliminary Letter Report
4
10
10
4
2
4
34
$ 3,684
Prepare/Present Final Letter Report
2
5
5
2
4
18
$ 1,887
Subtotal Preliminary Phase, Area 100 (LS):
I 57
225
225
69
56
35
667
I $ 73,944
TOTAL BASIC SERVICES:
I 57
225
225
69
56
35
667 I
$ 73,944
ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
Preliminary Phase, Area 110 (CP):
Engineering:
Subtotal Engineering:
t
Reimbursable Expenses:
Deliveries
+/-5 Deliveries @ $15/ea.
$ 75
Mileage/Travel
+/-8 Trips @ 52 mi/trip @ $0.36/mi
$ 150
Meals/Lodging
$ 360
Subtotal Reimbursable Expenses:
I [
$ 585
Subconsultants/Vendors:
Subconsultant Administrative Fee I
10%
Subtotal Subconsultants/Vendors: I
Subtotal Prlm. Ph. Add. Svcs., Area 110 (CP): I
I
$ 585
TOTAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES:
$ 585
` TOTAL COST:
57
225
225
69
56
35
667
$ 74,529
Assumptions:
1) Design of all segments to be done concurrently as one drawing package
2) No New ROW, Sidewalks, Street Lights, Easements, or Environmental Assessments
S:\project\pu0285-Plnd-SH35_Trnk_SS\Cost_Estimates\Eng\005-exh-d-per-engr-mp-cost-15-sep-03.xls\Task Originated: 01/13/03
Form: 2/12/03 Page 1 of 1 Printed: 9/16/2003
3
3
1
a
N
mm
Submit "Bid Ready" PS&E Package
Obtain Final Signatures and Approvals
Prepare 100% PS&E Package
Prepare 90% PS&E Package
0
d
Uodaa JauaW IIwgng
m
3
v
No a + G NA A N O
j E. Op N N N N m•
N a a a u a n a n m a a a
N N N N m N N N N N N N N m N h y •m .'p.
f f(3 C 0 1 C i , '1^ 1 'f ? f
W � A N N `N ( N
NO A W ` AA A A N O O W W A (3 • p,W
W
N m ' O] Of N T. m 2 O2 7 T. il mj O> T. T.
W V O1 QN A A N y 5 ` N
N A AA W W A AN A A V.
p• N• pA
A
•
3
N
m
0
0
z
F
1
l
Vl
1O cm tp �
W W W W W W
1 -I
w
A w
I
Uodea Jada1 FuugnS
£0/9/0L uotN
1
C T
T1
O'
\Tm
Z
>o
ZD(
vvth
oo0c
-
yD
C
o
c cnn z
z
o,�,^^
VI
mmZ
>n
N Z
ry
m
mm
r
co
CITY OF PEARLAND
Construction Cost Estimating Workbook
Order of Magnitude
PROJECT NUMBER : PU0285
SCENARIO : State Highway 35 South Trunk Sewer
SERVICE AREA : Magnolia
Subbasin : State Highway 35 South Trunk Sewer
PROJECT COST: $ 3,476,650
16-Sep-03
Construction Costs Adjustment
Date of Estimate :
ENR Construction Cost Index November-02
ENR Construction Cost Index ,Lily-03
Inflation rate
Number of Years
Average Inflation rate
Period in years
Difficulty Factor (Urban, Utility Relocation and Dewatering)
April-03
6578
6695
1.8%
0.67
3%
25
1.15
Manhole
Number
FacilityDescription
p
Diameter
inches
Length
feet
Depth
feet
Number
Manholes
of
Capacity
mgd
or
mg
Unit
Prices
Right
-of
-Way
Manhole
Manhole
Odor
Construction
Right
of
Way
Capital
0 &
M
Present
Worth
From
To
Material
Bid
Tab
Restoration
Misc.
(YIN)
and
Pavement
(YIN)
Total
(ac)
(type)
($lft2)
Unit
Price
Facility
Cost
Cost
Control
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Value
Section
No.
1
- Sanitary
Sewer
along
State
Highway
35
from
Swensen
Road
to
Magnolia
Road
19
100'
N
of
19
Tunnel
under
John
Lizer
12,0
100
20.0
2
$
13.57
$ 299.66
S 299.66
0.02
$ -
$ 3,983
$ 29,966
$ 7,967
$ 37,933
$ -
$ 52,347
$ 70
$ 41,316
100'
N
of
19
134
Gravity
Sewer
12.0
2,274
16.5
5
$
13.57
$
76.36
y
$ 30.05
$ -
:$ 106.41
0.52
2
$ 2.50
$ 3,383
$ 241,979
$ 16,917
$ 258,896
$ 56,850
$ 414,126
$ 1,592
$ 392,675
Sub
Total
$ 296,828
$ 56,850
$ 466,473
$ 1,662
$433,991
Section
No.
2
- Sanitary
Sewer
along
State
Highway
35
from
Magnolia
Road
to
Cowart
Creek
and
Industrial
Road
West
of
State
Highway
:35
19
100'
N
of
47
Gravity
Sewer
30.0
1,881
21.0
4
$
76.67
$ 136.63
y
$ 53.77
$ -
a 190.40
0.43
2
$ 2.50
$ 7,151
$ 358,144
$
28,604
$ 386,748
$ 47,025
$ 580,737
$ 3,292
$ 592,858
100'
N
of
47
47
Tunnel
under
High
Road
School
Access
30.0
100
20.0
2
$ 76.67
$ 615.81
:i 615.81
0.02
$ -
$ 7,001
$ 61,581
$ 14,002
$ 75,583
$ -
$ 104,305
$ 175
$
84,041
47
100'
N
of 52
Gravity
Sewer
30.0
2,227
18.5
3
$ 76.67
$ 129.92
y
$ 51.13
$ -
$ 181.05
0.51
2
$ 2.50
$ 6,701
$ 403,191
$
20,103
$ 423,294
$ 55,675
$
639,820
$ 3,897
$ 667,317
100'
N
of
52
52
Tunnel
under
Oiler
Drive
30.0
100
17.0
2
$ 76.67
$ 615.81
S 615.81
0.02
2
$ 2.50
$ 6,551
$ 61,581
$ 13,102
$ 74,683
$ 2,500
$ 105,563
$
175
$ 85,641
52
56
Gravity
Sewer
24.0
2,995
14.0
6
$ 50.29
$ 101.48
y
$ 39.94
$ -
S 141.42
0.69
2
$ 2.50
$ 6,101
$ 423,540
$
36,606
$ 460,147
$ 74,875
$ 709,877
$ 5,241
$ 788,323
56
3
Gravity
Sewer
27.0
221
11.5
1
$ 62.83
$
87.00
y
$ 34.24
$ -
S 121.24
0.05
2
$ 2.50
$ 5,651
$ 26,794
$
5,651
$ 32,445
$ 5,525
$ 50,299
$
387
$ 56,661
3
59
Gravity
Sewer
24.0
2,085
10.5
4
$ 50.29
$
73.89
y
$ 29.08
$ -
S 102.98
0.48
2
$ 2.50
$ 5,501
$ 214,709
$ 22,004
$ 236,714
$ 52,125
$ 378,790
$ 3,649
$ 465,177
59
150'
W of
56
Tunnel
under
State
Highway
35
24.0
150
11.0
2
$ 50.29
$ 516.73
;' 516.73
0.03
$ -
$ 5,651
$ 77,510
$ 11,302
$ 88,812
$ -
$ 122,561
$
263
$ 101,498
150'
W
of
56
26
Industrial
Road
Sewer
West
Gravity
12.0
2,635
9.0
5
$ 13.57
$
46.69
y
$ 18.38
$ -
S
65.06
0.60
$ -
$ 2,333
$ 171,445
$ 11,667
$ 183,113
$ -
$ 252,695
$
1,845
$
272,255
Sub
Total
$ 1,961,538
$ 237,725
$ 2,944,648
$ 18,923
$3,113,771
Section
No.
3
- Sanitary
Sewer
along
John
Lizer
Road
from
State
Highway
35
to
Pearland
Parkway
and
along
Pearland
Parkway
North
19
129
Gravity
Sewer
24.0
2,610
20.0
5
$ 50.29
$ 120.40
y
$ 47.39
$ -
5 167.78
0.60
$ -
$ 7,001
$ 437,916
$ 35,005
$ 472,921
$ -
$ 652,631
$
4,568
$ 693,661
129
100'
N
of
129
Tunnel
under
John
Lizer
18.0
100
19.0
2
$ 29.20
$ 412.15
S 412.15
0.02
$ -
$ 5,184
$ 41,215
$ 10,369
$ 51,583
$ -
$ 71,185
$
175
$
60,041
100'
N
of
129
133
Gravity
Sewer
18.0
1,849
16.5
4
$ 29.20
$ 93.24
y
$ 36.70
$ -
S 129.94
0.42
$ -
$ 4,734
$ 240,261
$ 18,937
$ 259,199
$ -
$ 357,694
$
3,236
$ 415,577
Sub
Total
$ 783,703
$ -
$ 1,081,510
$
7,978
$1,169,279
Section
No.
4 - Sanitary
Sewer
along
North
Access
Road
for
Pearland
High
School
from
State
Highway
35 to
Pearland
Parkway
47
21
Gravity
Sewer
E v
1
,,,
17
0
4
$ 29.20
$ 95.83
y
$ 37.72
$ 37.34
S 170.89
0.45
4
$ 5.00
$ 4,884
$ 337,161
$ 19,537
$ 356,699
$ 98,650
$ 590,894
$
3,453
$ 622,215
Sub
Total
356,699
$ 98,650
$ 590,894
$ 3,453
$ 622,215
`$
Section
No.
5 - Sanitary
Sewer
along
Industrial
Road
East
of
State
Highway
35
3
29
Industrial
Road East
Sewer
Gravity
8.0
11
8 5
3
$ 6.31
$ 33.46
$ 13.17
$ -
S 46.63
0.35
2
$ 2.50
$ 2,333
$ 70,881
$ 7,000
$ 77,881
$ 38,000
$ 145,476
$ 1,064
$ 167,302
Sub
Total
$ 77,881
$ 136,650
$ 145,476
$ 1,064
$ 167,302
TOTAL:
$ 3,476,650
$ 529,875
$ 5,229,001
$ 33,080
$5,506,558
Notes
:
1. Capital Cost includes ROW Acquisition, Engineering (8%), Legal and Administration (5%), Construction Management (10%) and Construction Contingencies (15%).
2. ROWs are 10 foot wide and costs categories are 1) Acquire Easement ($1.25), 2) Rural Area ($2.50 3) Developed Area ($3.75) 4) Primary ($5.00).
s1project\pu02851estimslconst1003- CoP- SH 35 Trunk- Construction Cost.xls
ts
i t ice.
•,1' Cyr
dA' / T'• _
_ •
J- ./ ett.; Ire
•
r•
M
•
•
Exhibit
Resolution No. R2003-137
11 pages & 8 nl awinys
I.
1.7244.'r! �-�a‘-i�� ..e.,s�._ _ '.ti +'�' • -
ant
•
Are
J ;C.,,,,;; >_
• _ram_ -r. �l _ ✓, ��1' 1 �����:.
4• swami..
-, fry -,i4. y ° .
--1-
a. r _, _ ' •- .-c -•
�.-. Z_-. •�^
CITY OF PEARLAND
Veteran's Lift Station Service Area
Analysis and Recommendation Report
... -I a
siwi ant
•
__n !lll�iiv
atta taws
-=r�mnnati�it�rm�►
—�• 1-111111 " la
i1urnv111f.y
ASTIIUCIME,JT&
Engineering 0 Management 0 Technology
•
Mr. Joe Wertz, Jr.
Projects Director
City of Pearland
3519 Liberty Drive, 3 d Floor
Pearland, Texas 77581
August 5, 2004
S&B Letter No.: U-0285.003
S&B Project No.: U-0285
Resolution No.: R2003-137
Re.: Letter Report for the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area
Analysis and Recommendations for Improvements
Dear Mr. Wertz:
The following is S&B Infrastructure, Ltd 's (S&B) Letter Report for the analysis of the Veteran's Lift
Station Service Area and Recommendations for Improvements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the request of the City of Pearland (City), S&B has prepared this Letter Report to present the results
of an analysis of the current and future wastewater system requirements for the Veteran's Lift Station
Service Area, and make recommendations for the most cost-effective approach to future City
improvements in the region.
The current Veteran's Lift Station Service Area encompasses approximately 1,280 acres in southern
Pearland, Brazoria County, Texas. Within the service area ale business industrial, and residential
developments parks, and a significant amount of undeveloped acreage. This entire area is serviced by
numerous shallow gravity sewer systems with small lift stations that convey wastewater flows through
several small forcemains to other gravity systems that eventually lead to the Barry Rose and Southwest
Environmental Center Wastewater Treatment Plants.
The existing shallow sanitary sewer systems were designed and constructed with a depth constraint of
approximately 20 feet below natural ground. This design guideline was adopted some time ago by the
City based on geotechnical testing evidence of a perched water table and observed field conditions during
previous construction projects of a sand lens located at this depth. This depth restriction limited the area
that could be served by a single gravity sanitary system without the numerous small lift stations
previously mentioned.
A number of different growth pattern scenarios were evaluated for use in determining current and future
capacity requirements of the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area. All growth pattern scenarios were
developed using the City of Pearland's Existing and Proposed Land Use Plan found in their 1999-2020
Comprehensive Plan. Daily wastewater flows were calculated for existing and future conditions using
these estimated population numbers and usage rate criteria from the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ), formerly the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission,
Chapter 317 — Design Criteria for Sewerage System (§317.4 Wastewater Treatment Facilities, figure 1:
Page 1 of 10
30 TAC §317.4(a)). After preliminary population and wastewater flow information for five (5) different
growth pattern scenarios (Exhibits 7.2 - 7.6) was reviewed with the City, S&B was directed to use the
City Limits Current Growth Pattern Scenario - Year 2050 (Exhibit 7.3) as the basis for further design,
analysis, cost comparisons, and recommendations for improvements.
The improvements recommended for the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area include construction of a
single ` regional" lift station at the southeast corner of Magnolia Street and Veterans Drive, and an
integrated "deep" trunk gravity sanitary sewer system. The main trunk sewers will extend from the
recommended lift station south along Veterans Drive to the City Limits, east along Magnolia St. and
John Lizer Road to Pearland Parkway, and south along State Highway 35 from Magnolia Road to
Cowart Creek. Pipe sizes will range from 24 to 36 inches. Smaller branches of the trunk sewer system
will extend north along SH 35 to pick up the Swensen lift station east from SH 35 along the high school
north access road to Pearland Parkway to pick up that lift station and east and west from SH 35 along
Industrial Drive. A future branch will extend west from Veterans along Bailey to McLean then turn
north for a thousand feet or so to pick up two existing lift stations. Another future branch will extend
east from Veterans Drive along future Bailey Rd. then south along Wells Drive to McKeever Road, then
east along McKeever Road approximately 1,500 feet. Sizes of the branch trunks will range from 12 to
18 inches.
This system will service more than 3,000 acres (approximately 1 700 additional acres) and provide for
the elimination of up to nine (9) small existing lift stations. It will also allow most if not all of the
undeveloped property within the service area to be developed without lift stations in the future To serve
this expanded area with the recommended regional lift station location 20 % of the recommended gravity
trunk sewer system, along Magnolia Street and Veterans Drive, will exceed the old 20-foot depth limit
with the maximum depth of 24 feet at the lift station. However, today's impioved construction
techniques and pipe materials allow for construction of deep sanitary systems that provide acceptable
service life expectancy even in saturated soil conditions such as those found in the Veteran's Lift Station
Service Area. The new lift station will also be SCADA ready and will initially convey flows to the
Southwest Environmental Center Wastewater Treatment Plant, and capable of being easily modified to
divert flows to other treatment plants in the future if needed.
Estimated construction costs were developed to compare the recommended deep trunk sewer/regional lift
station approach to future development of the service area versus continuing the current shallow
sewer/multiple lift station approach. While the capital cost of a deep trunk sewer system will be more,
based on S&B's life cost analysis, the recommended approach is more cost efficient overall for the fifty
year design life of the facilities the City will likely build within the entire service area. It is also less
maintenance intensive and therefore more cost efficient to service one "regional" lift station than the nine
(9) existing and possibly as many as four (4) future "small" lift stations. Funding for implementation of
most of the recommended deep trunk sewers and the regional lift station will be provided through the
City and the Pearland Economic Development Council (PEDC) Some portions will be funded by or
even constructed by future developments.
S&B believes that the current sanitary sewer design approach of shallow sewers and small lift stations in
the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area must be changed to ensure a more cost effective solution to long-
term development of the sewerage system within the service area and reduce the future maintenance
Page 2 of 10
burden for the City. A deep trunk sewer/regional lift station design approach does both. The analysis,
findings, and recommendations presented in this report merely represent the first step in the process of
developing an efficient regional wastewater system The next steps are detailed final design and
preparation of engineering plans, followed by construction.
S&B appreciates the opportunity to present this report and looks forward to working with the City of
Pearland in the successful development of the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On September 29, 2003, S&B was authorized by the City of Pearland to perform an analysis of
the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area and make recommendations for improvements to ensure a
cost effective, orderly, planned development of the wastewater collection and conveyance system
for the entire service area. In preparing this report, S&B used Montgomery Watson Harza's
(MWH) wastewater master plan and the City's 1999-2020 Comprehensive Plan as guidelines in
developing service area limits and associated populations of the existing sewered areas and five
(5) long-range growth/build-out scenarios for currently unsewered property. State criteria for
per capita wastewater flows were applied to these population projections to develop the current
and future sewer system and lift station capacity requirements as the basis for evaluation and
comparison of the five growth scenarios. Specific design considerations for each of these
scenarios are discussed in greater detail in Section 4 of this report.
2.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to present the results of an assessment of the current and future
sewerage requirements for the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area and to make recommendations
for cost-effective future improvements. It is not intended to provide a design, only an
exploration of options and possible solutions to be studied further in the final design process.
Detailed final designs, accompanied by topographic surveys and geotechnical investigations,
must be conducted in order to effectively implement the recommended solution during
development of the service area.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Veteran's Lift Station Service Area currently covers approximately 1,280 acres of land in
south central Pearland Biazoria County, Texas The limits and location of the existing service
area are shown on Exhibit 7.1. The service area contains business, industrial, and residential
developments, parks, and undeveloped acreage All the currently sewered areas within the entire
Veteran's Lift Station Seivice Area are serviced by shallow gravity sewer systems with numerous
small lift stations. Wastewater flows from the area are conveyed by force mains to other gravity
sewer systems that ultimately lead to the Barry Rose and Southwest Environmental Center
Wastewater Treatment Plants.
4.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) prepared a wastewater master plan for the City of Pearland
titled "Wastewater and SCADA System Master Plan" in October 2002. As part of this service,
Page 3 of 10
MWH gathered information from City Departments to establish service area limits for the City's
wastewater treatment plants. In accordance with the MWH Master Plan, the Veteran's Lift
Station Service Area is actually a sub -area of the Southwest Environmental Center Wastewater
Treatment Plant service area MWH then developed a hydraulic model for the wastewater
systems to identify existing capacity deficiencies and future capacity requirements.
The City requested that S&B use information from MWH's wastewater master plan and the
City's 1999-2020 Comprehensive Plan in analyzing the Veteran s Lift Station Service Area. The
City also requested that a cost comparison be performed for developing the regions wastewater
system with a deep gravity sanitary sewer system, a regional lift station, and eliminating as many
small existing lift stations as was feasible, versus maintaining the existing system and continuing
development of the wastewater system using the current shallow sewer/multiple lift station
approach.
The design considerations necessary in performing the analysis of the Veteran's Lift Station
Service Area can be broken down into four primary categories; 1) establishing the ultimate limits
of the service area, 2) estimating population growth, 3) calculating daily wastewater flows, and
4) flow conveyance hydraulics and system depth. The assumptions, criteria, and methodologies
covered under these topics below provide the basic design tools to answer questions regarding
the quantity of sewage that will need to be conveyed and how to convey it.
4.1 SERVICE AREA LIMITS
In determining the limits of the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area for this evaluation,
S&B took into consideration: the MWH master plan, the City's 1999-2020
Comprehensive Plan area topography and physical restrictions, such as roads and
streams, input from City staff, and a "new' maximum sewer depth of 24 feet below
existing grade. From this, the maximum serviceable area was determined to be some
3,000 acres. The limits of this service area are roughly Mary's Creek on the north, the
Pearland Parkway corridor on the east, McLean Rd. on the west, and the current City
Limits on the south, as shown on Exhibits 7.1-7.4.
4.2 POPULATION GROWTH
A number of different growth pattern scenarios were evaluated to determine the future
capacity requirements of the Veteran s Lift Station Service Area. All growth pattern
scenarios were developed and evaluated using the City of Pearland's existing and
proposed Land Use Plan found in their 1999-2020 Comprehensive Plan, existing GIS
data (parcels, zoning maps, collection systems, etc...), and 2002 aerial photography.
The different growth pattern scenarios are shown graphically on Exhibits 7.2 through
7.6.
Population numbers of 3.2 persons per dwelling unit were used for all low-, medium -
and high -density residential developments and undeveloped areas. Dwellings for
undeveloped residential areas were calculated using the maximum dwelling units per acre
allowed per the Comprehensive Plan (4 dwellings per acre for low density residential, 10
dwellings per acre for medium density residential, and 10 dwellings per acre per 3 story
Page 4 of 10
height for high density residential). Current populations for industrial light industrial,
general business and schools were obtained through site visit and telephone interviews
with current tenants In the absence of existing data, criteria used by the City's Fire
Marshall of 1 person per 100 square feet, was used. From the data discussed above, the
following five (5) population growth/build-out scenarios were developed:
Existing Scenario - Year 2000 : This scenario represents the total number of people
within the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area already connected to a City sewer. The
area encompassed by this scenario is shown as Sewered, Developed" on Exhibit 7.1.
Existing Scenario with 100% Sewered System - Year 2005 : This scenario represents the
total number of people within the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area projected to be
connected to a City sewer by 2005. The area encompassed by this scenario is shown as
`Sewered, Developed" on Exhibit 7.2 and is bound on the south by the current city
limits.
City Limits Curr ent Growth Pattern Scenario - Year 2050 : This scenario represents the
total number of people within the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area projected to be
connected to a City sewer by 2050 based on current growth patterns. And, it is the basis
for the findings and recommendations presented later in this report. The area
encompassed by this scenario is shown as "Sewered, Developed" on Exhibit 7.3.
City Limits Build -Out Scenario - Year 2050 : This scenario represents the total number
of people within the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area projected to be connected to a
City sewer by 2050 based on the Comprehensive Plan's `Ultimate Build -Out" growth
patterns. This includes re -development of existing rural or ` Hoise-Lot' parcels to low
density residential lots. The area encompassed by this scenario is shown as "Sewered,
Build -Out" on Exhibit 7.4.
City Limits and ETJ Current Growth Pattern Scenario - Year 2070 : This scenario
represents the total number of people within the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area
projected to be connected to a City sewer by 2050, plus, the total number of people
projected to be within the City's ETJ to the south, that could be connected to a City
sewer by 2070 based on current growth patterns. The area encompassed by this scenario
is shown as "Sewered, Developed" on Exhibit 7.5. The wastewater numbers derived
from this population projection were not used to develop the future sewer system
recommendations.
City Limits and ETJ Build -Out Scenario - Year 2070 : This scenario represents the total
number of people within the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area projected to be
connected to a City sewer by 2050, plus the total number of people projected to occupy
areas within the City's ETJ to the south, that could be connected to a City sewer by 2070
on the Comprehensive Plan's ' Ultimate Build -Out' growth patterns. The area
encompassed by this scenario is shown as "Sewered, Build -Out" on Exhibit 7.6. The
wastewater numbers derived from this population projection were not used to develop the
future sewer system recommendations.
Page 5 of to
Population numbers for all scenarios are shown in the tables found on Exhibits 7.1-7.6.
4.3 CALCULATING DAILY WASTEWATER FLOWS
Daily wastewater flows for the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area were calculated for
existing and future conditions using the estimated population numbers and criteria from
TCEQ Chapter 317 — Design Criteria for Sewerage System (§317.4 Wastewater
Treatment Facilities, figure 1: 30 TAC §317.4(a)).
The design daily wastewater flows, in gallons per day per person are:
Daily
(GPD
Wastewater
/
Flow
Zone
Person)
General
Business
20
Industrial
20
Light
Industrial
20
Low
Density
Residential
100
Medium
Density
Residential
100
Parks
5
Public
/ Semi -Public
20
The daily wastewater flows generated by the different growth pattern scenarios are
shown on Exhibits 7.1 through 7.6.
4.4 FLOW CONVEYANCE HYDRAULICS AND SYSTEM DEPTH
At the request of the City, a uniform peak factor of 4 was applied to the daily wastewater
flows determined in Section 4.3 to establish the design flows. In accordance with state
criteria, a roughness coefficient of 0.013 was used. Flow velocities were held to a
minimum of 2.0 feet per second. The system was designed for "no surcharging" during
dry- and wet -weather design flows
Analysis of flow conveyance hydraulics consisted of using Manning's formula to
evaluate closed conduit system capacities of proposed gravity sanitary sewers to
determine preliminary pipe size/slope combinations required to convey the design flows.
This pipe size and slope data was entered into AicView (by ESRI) along with the
preliminary system layout and GIS topographic data from the City's web site (reconciled
against field survey data provided by C.L. Davis & Co. (CLD)). Flowlines
and top elevations for the existing small lift stations and topographic information for
other pertinent features within the Veteran s Lift Station Service Area (also provided by
CLD) were also added. Finally, the maximum allowable flowline depth of 24 feet below
grade was entered.
Page 6oflo
The result was a 3-D computer model of a trunk sanitary sewer system for the entire
service area. The starting flowlines of various branches were then adjusted to meet
capture depth requirements at as many of the existing small lift stations in the service
area as were possible. Starting flowlines of branches that would not be capturing an
existing lift station were adjusted to ensure the "actual" service area limits at least
matched the `evaluation" service area limits discussed in Section 4.1 above. Based on
these point flowlines, the pipe size/slope information, and the maximum allowable
flowline depth, the model calculated the profiles for every trunk sewer in both the
shallow and deep systems. Upon review, only minor adjustments were needed to resolve
a few flowlme conflicts and velocity deficiencies and bring both systems into compliance
with all design criteria previously discussed.
5.0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
5.1 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
• Alternative No. 1 - Continue Development Of The Service Area With Shallow
Gravity Sewers And Numerous Small Lift Stations
Under this alternative, that could also be called the "Do Nothing" alternative, the
City would maintain the existing sewers and numerous lift stations indefinitely and
future development of the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area system would continue
using the current shallow sewer/multiple lift station design approach. The shallower
trunk system in this approach would require three new lift stations; one at State
Highway 35 and Magnolia, one on Veterans south of Bailey Road, and one at
Pearland Parkway Estates, with firm capacities of 6.56, 5.40 and 0.56 million
gallons per day, respectively.
Advantage:
• Lower capital cost for shallower trunk sewers (See Table 8.2 and 8.3).
Disadvantages:
• Higher aggregate capital and long-term O&M costs for three new
smaller/shallower lift stations versus one larger/deeper regional lift
station.
• Continued O&M cost for the existing small lift stations/shallow sewers
(See Tables 8.2 and 8.3).
• Does not benefit from excellent current construction market prices since
construction would be done on an as needed basis over several years.
• Shallow trunk sewers will force some future land development projects
to construct small lift stations further adding to the City's O&M burden.
• All flows pumped at least twice.
Estimated construction cost for this alternative is: $8,318,775
Page 7 of 10
Estimated present worth value for this alternative is: $21,388,795
• Alternative No. 2 - Construct A Deep Trunk Gravity Sanitary Sewer System
With A Regional Lift Station
This alternative consists of a regional lift station at the southeast corner of Veterans
and Magnolia, with an approximate firm capacity of 10.6 million gallons per day,
and trunk gravity sanitary sewers as follows:
• south along Veterans to the City Limits,
• west along Bailey Road from Veterans to McLean, then north for
approximately 1,000 feet,
• east along Bailey from Veterans to Wells Drive, then south to McKeever,
• east along Magnolia/John Lizer from the lift station to Pearland Parkway,
• north along SH 35 from Magnolia to Swensen,
• south along SH 35 from Magnolia to Cowart Creek
• east along the high school north access road from SH 35 to Pearland
Parkway, and east and west from SH 35 along Industrial Drive.
Additionally, as many small existing lift stations as is feasible would be
eliminated
Advantages:
• Lower capital cost for one large/deep regional lift station than aggregate
capital cost for three new small/shallow stations.
• Lower long -team O&M cost for one larger regional lift station and deep
sewers versus three new small/shallow stations.
• No long-term O&M cost for existing lift stations that would be
eliminated (See Tables 8.2 and 8 3).
• Construction of most of the recommended system could be done now,
taking advantage of excellent construction market prices
• Minimize impacts and disruptions to the area's quickly growing
residential and commercial population.
• Makes the whole service area more easily developable for existing and
future property owners.
• All flows pumped once.
Disadvantage:
• Higher capital cost for deep trunk sewers (See Tables 8.2 and 8.3).
Estimated construction cost for this alternative is: $8,801,048
Estimated present worth value for this alternative is: $18,492,425
Page 8 of 10
5.2 FINDINGS
Over the next few years the rapid growth and development currently seen in the
Veteran's Lift Station Service Area are expected to continue and a "regional'
wastewater collection and conveyance system will be required. There are two basic
design approaches to regional wastewater collection and conveyance; deep systems that
utilize long, continuous, gravity trunk sewers feeding into a deep lift station, and shallow
systems consisting of shorter runs of the same size trunk sewers and multiple lift stations
Each of these approaches have advantages and disadvantages; amount and type of
material and equipment, constructability (mostly based on physical and geotechnical site
conditions), anticipated life, possible right-of-way acquisition(s), and operation and
maintenance. All of these factors can be quantified in terms of capital and O&M costs to
develop present value "life cycle costs ' for each type of system. An example calculation
for the life cycle costs is shown in Table 8.1 - Life Cycle Cost Analysis. A comparison
of these present values, along with an evaluation of the current construction market,
flexibility and adaptability of the system with respect to projected vs. actual growth
patterns, and total area serviceable for the money, form the basis of S&B's findings as
follows:
Continuing development of the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area using the current
design approach of shallow sewers and multiple lift stations is not a cost effective
solution when compared to an integrated deep gravity sewer/regional lift station system.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Veteran s Lift Station Service Area is expected to experience rapid growth and development
over the next few years as evidenced by several subdivisions in the area currently under
construction or in planning, and interest from industrial concerns according to information
provided by PEDC. Effective planning performed with an understanding of potential population
growth, such as what has been done here, will lead to solutions that are cost effective in capital
and long-term O&M costs, as well as life expectancy. Therefore, S&B respectfully recommends
Alternative No. 2, the regional lift station and trunk gravity sanitary sewer system as outlined in
Section 5.1 above, as the most cost effective approach to provide regional sanitary sewer service
to the Veteran's Lift Station Service Area.
Furthermore, S&B recommends immediate implementation of several key portions of the
recommended solution, specifically; the trunk sewers along Veterans Dr. approximately 2,000
feet south of Magnolia St., along Magnolia St. and John Lizer Rd. from Veterans Dr. to
Pearland Parkway, and along SH 35 from Swensen St. to Cowart Creek. We feel these projects
should proceed immediately so that current developments can take advantage of the deeper
gravity systems and be designed without small lift stations that would just have to be abandoned
in a few years. In addition, completing these facilities now would take advantage of not only an
excellent construction market at this time but would also minimize impacts and disruptions to the
area s quickly growing residential and commercial population. The next step in the
implementation of the recommended solution is to begin final design of the key portions of the
improvements including a detailed survey as well as a geotechnical investigation of the area.
Page 9 of 10
Once the key portions of the recommended system have been constructed, the City of Pearland
will have positioned the Veteran's Lift Station Seivice Area to be more easily developable for
current and future property owners with less capital expense and fewer maintenance concerns.
7.0 EXHIBITS
7.1 EXISTING SCENARIO — YEAR 2000
7.2 EXISTING SCENARIO WITH 100% SEWERED SYSTEM — YEAR 2005
7.3 CITY LIMITS CURRENT GROWTH PATTERN SCENARIO — YEAR 2050
7.4 CITY LIMITS BUILD -OUT SCENARIO — YEAR 2050
7.5 CITY LIMITS AND ETJ CURRENT GROWTH PATTERN SCENARIO YEAR 2070
7.6 CITY LIMITS AND ETJ BUILD -OUT SCENARIO — YEAR 2070
8.0 TABLES
8.1 LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS
8.2 ALTERNATIVE NO. 1 - PRESENT VALUE COST ESTIMATE
8.3 ALTERNATIVE NO. 2 - PRESENT VALUE COST ESTIMATE
Sincerely,
Mike Harju, P E
Project Manager
encl.
cc: Mr. H.J. Reddish, P.E. — S&B
JMH/dcd
S \project\u0285-pled-sh35_trnk_ss\admin\ltrs\003-cop-Wertz-vet-Is-Itr-rpt.doc
Page 10 of 10
Legend
P New Veterans Lift Station
P Required for Shallow Trunk Sewer
P Transfer Lift Station
P Existing Lift Station
P To be abandoned
N ew Manhole
Existing Manhole
New Sanitary Sewer
Existing Sanitary Sewer
Existing Force Main
Existing WWTP
• Drainage Feature
SERVICE, CONDITION
S ewered, Developed
l j Sewered, Undeveloped
U nsewered, Developed
Vi2 Unsewered, Undeveloped
-� Street
Existing Scenario - Year 2000
ZONE
Daily Wastewater
Flow
(GPD/Person)
Existing Persons
Connected to Sewer
Gallons Per
Day
Acres
General Business
20
55
1,100
52
Industrial
20
60
1,200
81
Light Industrial
20
100
2,000
232
Low Density Residential
100
2,914
291,400
547
Medium Density Residential
100
2,239
223,900
146
Parks
5
50
250
65
Public/Semi-Public
20
4,000
80,000
159
TOTAL
9,418
599,850
1,282
•r.•2 tF 50 _-
3.2 03.2 3.2 32 3.23 2 13 .!
f 32 323.2• 0 75.
3.2 0 3.2 j 3.2 3 :}
. 03.23,
3:21 3.2 3.2 3.2
1323.'1 32 :303.�! 33331.2222 3-'!
.23.2�323,2 - 0:g1 3,23.2 3.203.2753.2 j�3.2.23.2�.-3:2 __T 3.23.233.23.23.2 0 Ij3.210
,3.23.2 32 3.3.2�'. 210:
3.2 3.2 3_2 :0.2_23.23232'
3.23.2 3.
•3.2
3-23.2 3.
1 3.2 3.
3.2 3.
3.2 32
3.2
3.2 3.2
•_3.2
3.2
V
.-- 3.2 - 3.2
03.23.23.2 3.23.23.23 .23.2
3.2 3.2 3 - 3
10 3.2 3,2
03.2323.2 3.2 32 3.232�
3.2 3.2 32 3
03.2 3.2 4/' ` 0
3.2 3.23.2- f T �3.23.23•
0
e10 10 3.23.2 3.2 3,2323.2 3:
•2 32 3.23.2 3.2 3
232
23.23.2 3.23.2 3.23.23.2. 3.2
3.2323.2 3.2 3-2 3.2
3.2 3.2 3.2 0 . 3
12. .
-0
20 -
160
_. 98
3.2 3.232�, + 2020
3.2 3.23.23.2 10
3.2 1
3•23.2 3.2 3.2 �, ►1
3.2 3.2 3.2
3.23.23.23.2� r'
?3.2 3.2323.2�
23.23.23.2001� � , � - �i
3.2 3.2 3.232� . • � ���
2 3.2 3.2 3. 0 � ,�� ��.�
23.2 3.2
,3.23.2 . 3.23.2
2 3.2
j223 23.20 3.23,20 0 10
� 00
:3.23,2 3.20- 101000
3.23.23.2 3.23.2
2323.2 3•23.23.2 3.2
323'2 3.23.2
18 03.2 3.2 3. 3.2
2 - 3.2 ... �.
I_
Feet
1,300 2,600 5,200 7,800 10,400
ASIBIJICIU IIE,1111
rn9$ataief 0 Ki.ertieel (= TeelsOn
Exhibit No. 7.1 EXISTING SCENARIO - YEAR 2000
LLegend
New Veterans Lift Station
P Required for Shallow Trunk Sewer t
P Transfer Lift Station
P Existing Lift Station
P To be abandoned
New Manhole
Existing Manhole
N ew Sanitary Sewer
Existing Sanitary Sewer
Existing Force Main
Existing WWTP
Drainage Feature
S ewered, Developed
S ewered, Undeveloped
Street
Bailey
ci
co
Co Ifecierat
Existing Scenario
with
100%
Severed
System- Year
2005
ZONE
Daily
Flow
Wastewater
(GPD/Person)
Existing Persons
Connected to Sewer
Gallons Per
Day
Acres
General Business
20 55
1,100
52
Industrial
20 663
13,260
636
Light Industrial
20 263
5,260
413
Low Density Residential
100 4,033
403,300
1564
Medium Density
Residential
100
2,239
223,900
145
Parks
5 50
250
65
Public / Semi -Public
20 4,000
80,000
159
TOTAL
11,303
727,070
3,035
�RUCTIIII 1TD
0
Cowart Creek
Haste
Hastings ielcl
D
0 1,300 2,600
Exhibit No. 7.2 EXISTING SCENARIO WITH 100% SEWERED SYSTEM - YEAR 2005
71.( nf)n
Feet
10,400
1
Legend
New Veterans Lift Station
Required for Shallow Trunk Sewer
Transfer Lift Station
Existing Lift Station
To be abandoned
New Manhole
Existing Manhole
New Sanitary Sewer
Existing Sanitary Sewer
I Existing Force Main
Existing WWTP
Drainage Feature
Service, CONDITION
Sewered, Developed
Street
Terrell
Sharondal
Bailey
Trans
City Limits Current Growth
2050
Pattern Scenario - Year
ZONE
Daily
Wastewater
Flow
Existing
Persons of
Coverage Area
Existing Persons of
Coverage Area Plus
Ultimate
Undeveloped Areas
Gallons per
Day Existing
Gallons per Day
Existing &
Ultimate
Undeveloped
Acres
General Business
20
55
75
1,100
1,500
54
Industrial
20
663
1,323
13,260
26,460
636
Light Industrial
20
263
563
5,260
11,260
413
Low Density Residential
100
4,033
14,980
403,300
1,498,000
1,564
Medium Density Residential
100
2,239
3,115
223,900
311,500
144
Parks
5
50
75
250
375
65
Public / Semi -Public
20
4,000
4,000
80,000
80,000
159
TOTAL
11,303
24,131
727,070
1,929,095
3,035
Engineering ;= Management 0 Technology
lon►al
lfedernt
•-�• iiTiiwI•/
•.�allal
r, �
13L
111111 lli.I 54 °I'"'-lal/�i
Mt :Ill. -. ,4 + -�ra.M
rr rnnln • �'n iIrnC
el*ragi—INt • arwla►a•
1014.1
1583.8
1517.7
1,300 2,600
Hast I gs ield
fi4.• Hastings
Exhibit No.. 7-3 CITY LIMITS CURRENT GROWTH PATTERN SCENARIO - YEAR 2050
Feet
10,400
New Sanitary Sewer
Existing Sanitary Sewer
Existng Force Main
::• •�:• %► 7 -► -- 25 2
7-1 11.3 57.2
60.5 29• *'
63.4 44.2 13113.7
60 3i,74.714,2 26.5•I
59.2 35.6 25.1 31.3 409. •�
29.729.E 60.5 31.1 1•�
6.3 26
10.$9 38 11.E 1010 25
59.1
5.4 10.4 47 13.4 16.E
2229.5
59.4
29.8 47fi0.1 12.6 31.6 29-
66.9 10
23.5
59.4 7.3 30.3 32.210
59.8 60 32.1
15.5
71 58.9 48.1
24 61.3 5.9 28..
35.3 5.914.4
59.5 15.9 28.
15.91E 28.
31.8 31.8 28
1 59.5 58.2 -- 31.729
0 23.2 1824.1 18.1
2023.7 24 24.2 24. ; 28 C
0 21.215 ..-_ 24.118.1
14.9 17.9
14 923.9 9 2612.999.2926.9 23.923.
2 7 11.55.3 23.914.917.9 17.9 14.9
5 5.85.E 124.7
23.8 12.823.8 14.2
10 10 23.8 23.8 9.55
0.51023.723.82233.7
.5 23.7 23.7 11.9 1
-.�.86.2
59.9 13.1 23.923.91515 32.515 121524
59.349 60 .727 48.4 31.7 23. 29. •07 3.6 14.9 11.8 5718.1 11-
13.518.9
7.88 12.513.330.73021.23.27
City
Limits
Build
-Out
Scenario - Year 2050
ZONE
Daily
Wastewater
(GPD/Person)
Flow
Existing
Persons of
Area
Existing
Ultimate
Subdivisions,
Developed and
Undeveloped Areas
Gallons per Day
Existing
Gallons per Day
Ultimate Developed
and Undeveloped
Areas
Acres
Coverage
General Business
20
60
75
1,200
1,500
54
Industrial
20
663
1,340
13,260
26,800
636
Light Industrial
20
293
570
5,860
11,400
413
Low Density Residential
100
4,039
20,929
403,900
2,092,900
1,564
100
2,154
3,114
215,400
311,400
144
Medium Density Residential
Parks
5
75
75
375
375
65
Public / Semi -Public
20
4,000
4,000
80,000
80,000
159
TOTAL
11,284
30,103
719,995
2,524,375
3,035
3.23.2 3.23.23.23.2
10 32
3.2
.T` 24.2 10
232
d': 7 10.1
10.212 21.24.7
12 2423.9 35.7
1 12 15.8 21.413.9
1 16.9
15.3 18.24.7
1 30.518.3 2318.6
12.3 18.313.1
7 23.514.7 16,3
14.7 23.614.5
514.722.5 20.69.T'
.7 24 22.5 138
12 21.7 ` 2.53.
50.5 8
' 36.8 33.5 66.5
20.9 21.7
.94.814.7
14.E 14.614,E 36
12.412.4
14.611.8
23.7 719.114.830 2 10
n:.38 .-_. 3.8 �.. .L:71
Exhibit No. 7.4 CITY LIMITS BUILD -OUT SCENARIO - YEAR 2050
Existing Sanitary Sewer
Existing Force Main
City
Limits
and
ETJ
Current
Growth
Pattern
Scenario - Year 2070
ZONE
Flow
Daily
Wastewater
(GPD/Person)
Existing Persons
of Coverage Area
Existing Persons
Coverage Area
Ultimate Undeveloped
Areas
Plus
of
Gallons
Day
per
Existing
Gallons
Existing
Ultimate
Undeveloped
per Day
&
Acres
General Business
20
60
75
1,200
1,500
54
Industrial
20
887
4,007
17,740
80,140
2,494
Light Industrial
20
373
1,293
7,460
25,860
741
Low Density Residential
100
6,617
23,157
661,700
2,315,700
3,313
Medium Density Residential
100
2,154
3,115
215,400
311,500
144
Parks
5
75
75
375
375
65
Public / Semi -Public
20
4,000
4,000
80,000
80,000
159
TOTAL
14,166
35,722
983,875
2,815,075
6,970
Exhibit No. 7.5 CITY LIMITS AND ETJ CURRENT GROWTH PATTERN SCENARIO - YEAR 2070
11.724.2232
, 10
:.711.6 16.59.1
212 212 10.1.
22423.9 35.7 \ -
1 1215.821.413.9
16.9
' 15.3 - 18.24i
.1 30.518.3 2318.6
.12.3 18y318_1,
723777
14.7 23'614.5
514.7 - 20.69.1
36.8 33.5 66.5 21 7
20.9 21.7
g - 14.6 12.412,4
4.814.6 1A636 17.4
14.E 10.1 '1
57 38.E 23.7 14.830 2 10
30.321. 2.8 3 14. 8
118.3 117.9
124.2118.7118.5118.1 285.7
17.423.417.E 17.819.9 18,1�
9.2 23.6 30.3
10.423.2 217,81 . 34.3 !,
7
11.199.4 32.27E 27.34.842.5
11.1 29.1 23.8 20 ' 25 10.3
22.2 23.8 23.2 13.911.4
40.7 12.4
9.8 8.922 21.6 43.2 24.816.3 15.3'.
53.7 45 24.6 29.414.7 10.7
51.6 24.6 22.2 17.9 -
33.3 38.8 51.6 27.1 22 823.4 41.6
1
16.126 8.2 57.5 23.8 23.923.9 49,
32.2 22.8 12.6
373-8373'9 22.8 20.7 5.5
39.4 ti
100 29.5 23 23.424.E 22.9410.8
28.2: 35.314.417.411.811.9 5.3
11.2
58.E 25.5 53.3
106.3 25.5 66.367.1 67 67.16767.1 50 154.2 33.8,
13.813.9
Existing Manhole
New Sanitary Sewer
Existing Sanitary Sewer
Existing Force Main
•3� •r.• 7 v•• .. 25,29.
57.2 •fir
7.1 11.3 60.5
63.4 44.213;7.7 14.2 26.5
59.2 35,63125.1 31.3 40. .
29.760 29.E 60.5 31.1 19. •�r.
95? 26.
10.89 3811.61010 25. 9
5.4 59.4 10.44713.4 59.1 16:6.
-29 8 60.147.5 31.6 29.
2229.5 66.9
)• 74.5 15.9i8 28.
I 31.8. 119.9 31.8 28.
'i 59.5
II 58.2 59.9 31.7 29'
59.3 60 31.7 29.
13.5 13.1 23.
i8.949 30.730.727 48.4 23.2
7.88. 12_513.3
City Limits and ETJ Build
-Out Scenario - Year 2070
ZONE
Daily
(GPD/Person)
Wastewater
Flow
Existing PersonsGallons
of Coverage Area
Existing Subdivisions,
Ultimate Developed and
Undeveloped Areas
per Day
Existing
Gallons per Day
Ultimate
Developed and
Undeveloped
Areas
Acres
General Business
20
60
75
1,200
1,500
54
Industrial
20
887
4,860
17,740
97,200
2,494
Light Industrial
20
373
1.300
7,460
26,000
741
Low Density Residential
100
6,617
43,308
661,700
4,330,800
3,313
Medium Density Residential
100
2,154
3,114
215,400
311,400
144
Parks
5
75
75
375
375
65
Public / Semi -Public
20
4,000
4,000
80,000
80,000
159
TOTAL
14,166
56,732
983,875
4,847,275
6,970
21.7 20.5 19
53.9 17.9 11.9
11.9
20.4 23.5 12.3
16.624.3 17.7 54.8
11.223.3 19.622.8
47.617.9
30.4 24.E
26.326.2
84.6
44.4
54.8 37.566.4
30.834.7
0 23.2 1824.124.1 18.1
23.7 24 24.224.128_,.!
21.2 15--18.1:
0.323.9 926.99926.923.923'-!
23.9 17.9 17.914.9
5 5.8 129.2 124.7
�7 11.55.3
43.8 12.823.8 14.2
10 23.823.8 9.55,
0.5 23.7__23.7 18.1 1
• 8 23.91515 32.515 121524
623.9 14.9 11.8
118.3 24.7115.1
11.7
B.1 64 16 24.9
16.1.
5.7
s I n 30.430.E 8.719.?P a-4534.8
C�, 14.530.4 37 �81.4 39.d`\Gi } ;
27.835.3♦ 29.8 '. 40.8 '., M
a1s �` p
30.360.7 125.333.3 22 g26.1 12 E 29 762.E 24.311.5
330. 31.619.328.828.7 83.2 89.8.
33.530.3 29.8 60,8 2i.2
�6.9 34.E 16.7 2d.6 25.1 21.328.1 27.3
4 • 25.4 30.721,917.369.8 25.111323..9783.E 96,E 13.7 28 44.4
25.530.830.79.811.8 48.5 8.7 320.3
` I47 41.9 . 30.1 36 23.3 39.9 25,827,2 13.852.89•79•i - 24.32
` P tl1 7 16.5 29.931.7 128.4 35.930.i . 27.8 34.9 53.213.4 26.5
' 517-4 49.3
/36.5 11.728.2 37.512.312.9 36.744 59.7 .7 26 16.2 i3,312.865.9
20.320.E 9.9 61.940.E 39.91.9 54.9 12.4 61.437.1 24.2 11.9
15.8 13 27,3 9.6
/ 113.3 87.625.6 1415.4 38.939 28.839
29 6 27.216.8 56.5
6 62 2
47.j 25.624.623.9 159.8 42.7 52.237.8 g.3 56.3 56.$
96.222.E 1 1526,522 99 31.1106'4i3.212.9 53.8 56.3 61.530.7 6'
42.E 6,5 57.5 11.5 60.E 59.E 82.4 , /
13.4 31.6103.3 42.2 41.3 123.939.8 15.9 31.7 27.1
20 6.559.7 24.9 16.3 32.61 17 25.b9.4 29.661.1
127,9 122.1 59.9 9.3 9 4 27.3
_ 32,316.29,3 31 38.65.7 . 57.7 49.1
•�.. i23.5 62.5 12.96191n22:98.986.922:
43.4181`• b_, 127.9123.531.2 .B31,353'g12.2121.937.5122.1 97.524.E 28.E0
128 2 620.7 15 9720,511.E65.54.710.9 44.1122.1 122.1 10.635.1 10.8 1216,823.610 1.1455.811.58.465.527.E 312.2 32 5 6 16.312 9688,7 685,457.766.745.930.5 30.531.217.7
8.647.9 \ib J7.513.5•91i 18.4 30.72026.b10
31160356.414.3 28.4333.70.9 50.3 13.E1033.3153 \33.E49.112.9ip
13.2 173 19.812.5 9,71a
27.3 10 i D23.8 100� C .
w4 59 10 f
10 `. 1.613.7 �0 i
• 14. 10 \fti 10
Exhibit No. 7.6 CITY LIMITS AND ETJ BUILD -OUT SCENARIO - YEAR 2070
61.5 83.3
47.8
59.210')
1i1
12.8 58.1
Table 8 1 Life Cycle Cost Analysis
for New Veterans Lift Station
presented in Alternative No. 2
Example Live Cycle Cost Analysis
Proposed Capital Costs: $ 1,548,293
Proposed Annual O&M Costs $ 35,745
Present Value : $ 3,039,361
Inflation Rate : 3.30%
Municipal Bond Rate : 4.00%
n = year
Year
Proposed
Capital
Costs
Annual
Proposed
Costs
O&M
Total
Proposed
Costs
Inflation
Inflation
Cost
Municipal
Bond
Rate
Present Value
0
2004
$
-
1.0000
$
-
1.0000
$ -
1
2005
$1,548,293
$ -
$ 1,548,293
1.0330
$
1,599,387
0.9615
$ 1,537,872
2
2006
$
35,745
$ 35,745
1.0671
$ 38,143
0.9246
$ 35,266
3
2007
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.1023
$ 39,402
0.8890
$ 35,028
4
2008
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.1387
$ 40,702
0.8548
$ 34,792
5
2009
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.1763
$ 42,045
0.8219
$ 34,558
6
2010
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.2151
$ 43,433
0.7903
$ 34,326
7
2011
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.2552
$ 44,866
0.7599
$ 34,095
8
2012
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.2966
$ 46,347
0.7307
$ 33,865
9
2013
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.3394
$ 47,876
0.7026
$ 33,637
10
2014
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.3836
$ 49,456
0.6756
$ 33,411
11
2015
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.4292
$ 51,088
0.6496
$ 33,186
12
2016
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.4764
$ 52,774
0.6246
$ 32,963
13
2017
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.5251
$ 54,516
0.6006
$ 32,741
14
2018
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.5754
$ 56,315
0.5775
$ 32,520
15
2019
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.6274
$ 58,173
0.5553
$ 32,301
16
2020
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.6811
$ 60,093
0.5339
$ 32,084
17
2021
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.7366
$ 62,076
0.5134
$ 31,868
18
2022
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.7939
$ 64,124
0.4936
$ 31,654
19
2023
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.8531
$ 66,240
0.4746
$ 31,440
20
2024
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.9143
$ 68,426
0.4564
$ 31,229
21
2025
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
1.9775
$ 70,684
0.4388
$ 31,019
22
2026
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.0427
$ 73,017
0.4220
$ 30,810
23
2027
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.1101
$ 75,426
0.4057
$ 30,603
24
2028
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
21798
$ 77,916
0.3901
$ 30,397
25
2029
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.2517
$ 80,487
0.3751
$ 30,192
26
2030
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.3260
$ 83,143
0.3607
$ 29,989
27
2031
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.4028
$ 85,887
0.3468
$ 29,787
28
2032
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2
4820
$ 88,721
0.3335
$ 29,586
29
2033
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.5639
$ 91,649
0.3207
$ 29,387
30
2034
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.6486
$ 94,673
0.3083
$ 29,189
31
2035
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.7360
$ 97,797
0.2965
$ 28,993
32
2036
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2
8262
$
101,025
0.2851
$
28,798
33
2037
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
2.9195
$
104,358
0.2741
$
28,604
34
2038
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.0159
$
107,802
0.2636
$ 28,411
35
2039
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.1154
$
111,360
0.2534
$ 28,220
36
2040
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.2182
$
115,034
0.2437
$ 28,030
37
2041
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.3244
$
118,831
0 2343
$ 27,842
38
2042
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.4341
$
122,752
0.2253
$ 27,654
39
2043
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.5474
$ 126,803
0.2166
$ 27,468
40
2044
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.6645
$ 130,987
0.2083
$ 27,283
41
2045
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.7854
$ 135,310
0.2003
$ 27,100
42
2046
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
3.9103
$ 139,775
0.1926
$ 26,917
43
2047
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.0394
$ 144,388
0.1852
$ 26,736
44
2048
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.1727
$ 149,153
0.1780
$ 26,556
45
2049
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.3104
$ 154,075
0.1712
$ 26,377
46
2050
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.4526
$ 159,159
0.1646
$ 26,200
47
2051
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.5995
$ 164,411
0.1583
$ 26,023
48
2052
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.7513
$ 169,837
0.1522
$ 25,848
49
2053
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
4.9081
$ 175,441
0.1463
$ 25,674
50
2054
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
5.0701
$ 181,231
0.1407
$ 25,501
51
2055
$ 35,745
$ 35,745
5.2374
$ 187,212
0.1353
$ 25,330
S:\Project\U0285\Eng Rept
01-JMH Deep Sewer Magnolia Service Area !6-May-04
1 of 1
Originated : 5/16/04
Printed: 8/4/2004
CITY OF PEARLAND
2020 - CIP WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN
Construction Cost Estimating Workbook
Order of Magnitude
Construction
Year
Table 8.3 Alternative No. 2
Construct a Deep Trunk Gravity Sanitary Sewer System
with a Regional Lift Station
PROJECT NUMBER : U0285
SCENARIO : Deep Sewer Alternative - Build New Veterans Lift Station and Deep Trunk Sewer eliminating existing lift station inth Magnolia Subbasin
SERVICE AREA : SWEC
Subbasin : Veterans Drive
PRESENT VALUE : $ 18,492,425
ESTIMATE DATE: 16-May-04
Facility Location
At/Along
From
To
Facility
Description
Capacity
(mgd or
mill. g)
Diameter
(inches)
Length
(feet)
Depth
(feet)
Number of
Manholes
Unit Prices
Total
Rrgfit•of•Way
(ac)
(type)
($1ft2)
Manhole
Unit Price
(S)
Manhole
Cost
($)
subtotal
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
New Veterans Lift Station
LS 23 Magnolia Street at Weatherford
LS Eagle Lift Station
LS 20 Veterans Drive at Springfield
LS 49 Veterans Drive at Cobblestone
1 LS 52 Veterans Drive at Middle School
LS 19 McLean Road at Springfield
LS 21 Veterans at Magnolia Oaks
LS 24 State Highway 35 at Swensen
LS 54 Pearland Parkway at High School
LS 66 McLean Road at Caprock
New Lift Station
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
Lift Station Abandonment
10.60
0.11
0.11
0.281
0.40
0.32
0.19
0.32
0.16
0.52
0.94
0.56
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
r
2005
2005
2006
2006
2010
2010
2010
2010
2020
2020
2005
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2006
2020
2006
2006
2006
2010
2006
2006
System A
Veterans Drive Lift Station
Veterans Drive
Veterans Drive
Veterans Drive
Bailey Road
McLean Road
System B
Bailey Road (Future)
Wells Road
System C
Veterans Drive
CR 935
System D
Veteran Drive Lift Station
Magnolia Gravity Sewer
Magnolia Gravity Sewer
State Highway 35
State Highway 35
State Highway 35
State Highway 35
State Highway 35
System E
Industrial West
System F
Industrial East
System G
High School Gravity Sewer
System H
State Highway 35
System I
John Lizer
Pearland Parkway
LS
Magnolia (18)
Cobblestone (5)
Springfield (25)
Bailey (9)
Bailey
Veterans Drive (9)
Batley (6)
Batley (9)
Veterans Drive (121)
18
Veterans Drive (38)
Railroad
Magnolia (19)
School Access (47)
Oiler (52)
Industrial West (56)
Industrial East (3)
18
Cobblestone (5)
State Highway 35 (3)
Springfield (25)
Bailey (9)
McLean
Spring Branch (23)
Wells Road (8)
Dead End (105)
CR 935(121)
Dead End (125)
38
Railroad
State Highway 35 (56)
State Higway 35 (4)
Magnolia (19)
State Higway 35 (19)
Pearland Parkway (129)
State Highway 35 (19)
School Access (47)
Oiler (52)
Industrial West (56)
Industrial East (3)
Cowarts Creek (59)
Dead End (29)
Dead End (26)
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
11.4
7.9
Gravity Sewer
Pearland Parkway (21)
Marys Creek (134)
Pearland Parkway (129)
Marys Creek (133)
Tunnels
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
79'
7.9
4.1
4.1
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
Gravity Sewer
2.3
2.3I
36
30I
30
30
24
24
18
18
2.3r
1.6
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9 1
7.9
7.9
4.1
4.1
0.5
1.0
2.3
1.0
2.3
2.3
18
15
30
30
30
10
513
2,649
1,973
2,700
1,411
30
30.
24
24
12
2,620
3,500
8,420
2,400
135
18',
12
18
m
2,228
1,925
1,981
2,327
24.
24
22
20
15
15
Construction Costs Adjustment
Dec-03 6782
May-04 7065
Construction Cost Adjustment: 4.2%
Number of Years: 0.34
Present Value Factors
Average Inflation Rate:
Municipal Bond Rate:
Period in Years:
Difficulty Factor:
Odor Control
Cost
(S)
$ 97,693
17
2,995I
221'
2,085
1,520
2,785
17
13
24
$ 186.39
$ 167.72
5
22
21
1,973'.
2,374
2,610
1,949
18
16
13
11
16
17
17
19
3
1
15:
3
$ 165.06
$ 159.74
$ 124.17
$ 124.17
5 113.91
$ 101.60
0.00
0.12
0.61
$ 38.75
$ 210.52
$ 203.84
$ 567.83
$ 193.83
$ 178.93
0.45
0.62
0.32
0.60
0.80
$ 164.03 1i
$ 122.48
$ 98.01
r$ 28.43
5
4
5 34.72
$ 110.83
5 117.08
5 153.29
$ 131.39
1.93
0.55
0.03
0.51
0.34
0.45
0.53
0.69
0.05
0.48
1
1
1
1
1
0.35
5 1.25
1
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
11
0.64
0.45
0.54
1
1
0.60
0.45
1
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
1.25
1
1.25
1.25
$ 2.50
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 7,601
$ 7,451
7,301
7,001
$ 6,251
6,251
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
1.25
$ 1.25
4,884
$ 4,884
$ 4,284
$ 7,601
7,451
$ 36,505
S 28,004
$ 31,255
Capital Cost Adjustments
Construction Cost
(S)
$ 97,693
$ 18,753
$ 24,422
$ 34,191
5 72,834
5 2,333 $ 11,667
$ 7,451
$ 1.25
$ 1.25
$ 7,151
$ 7,601
5 6,701
$ 6,401
$ 5,951
5,651
5,351
2,333
2,333
$ 4,734
$ 3,533
$ 5,184
7,451
$ 26,804
$ 32,005
$
$ 976,935
$
12,501
12,501
Basic
Engineering
Services
10.0%
12,501
12,501
12,501
12,501
12,501
12,501
12,501
1,101,942
97,694
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
9,465
473,752
343,175
366,501
$ 35,706
322,864
432,873
928,333
$ 5,651
$ 21,404
$ 4,434
7,000
$ 14,001
$ 18,937
$ 17,667
$ 25,922
$ 17,737
Collection System Subtotal:
GRAND TOTAL:
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
97,693
1,250
$ 110,194
Special
Engineering
Services
7.0%
104,668
35,871
$ 482,762
$ 872,843
410,774
68,385
875
875
875
875
875
875
875
875
875
875
946
9,349
47,375
34,318
36,650
448,367
19,395
32,266
77,136
City's Legal and
Administralon
5.0%
43,287
92,833
526,965
32,719
225,762
50,213
110,684
237,610
295,626
426,018
10,467
3,587
48,847
625
625
Construction
Management
8.0%
s
625
625
625
625
663
625
625
625
625
6,544
33,163
24,022
25,655
13,577
22,600
48,276
41,077
44,837
52,696
3,272
22,576
5,021
$ 11,068
23,761
55,097
78,155
1,000
473
30,301
$ 64,983
7,327
2,511
42,602
27,382
$ 769,911
$ 33,793
4,675
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
Construction
Contingencies
1,000
1,000
1,000
23,688
18,325
9,698
16,143
1,000
1,000
•
146,540
1,875
Commissioning
and Start-up
1.0%
1,875
1,875
1,875
1,875
1,875
1,875
1,875
1,875
1,875
21,644
61,099
28,754
31,386
36,888
2,290
15,803
880,105 1
$ 249,637
167,432
3,515
7,748
16,633
20,694
757
7,479
46,417
5,233
1,794
24,138
43,642
20,539
$ 22,418
$ 26,348
1,636
37,900
27,454
29,320
15,516
25,829
165,291
9,769
125
125
125
125
125
Right of Way
Cost
($)
$ 121,968
125
125
125
125
125
1,420
34,630
11,288
19,167
538,937
125,876
$ 616,073
$ 174,746
$ 117,202
88,113
5,534
11,881
74,267
8,373
2,870
$ 14,781
$ 21,301
13,691
38,621
69,827
32,862
35,869
42,157
2,618
$ 384,955
440,052
83,716
62,938
18,061
14,024
Capital Cost
(2004 Vs)
121,968
1,548,293
18,251
18,251
18,251
18,251
18,251
18,251
Capital Cost
At Construction
($)
18,251
18,251
18,251
18,251
1,730,804
1,599,387
18,853
rs
71,063
51,476
54,975
29,093
48,430
95
935
64,931
$ 139,250
15,700
5,381
4,738
3,432
3,665
1,940
3,229
72,414
4,017
8,855
19,009
34,081
21,905
615,928
704,084
199,710
133,945
100,701
130,926
61,616
67,255
79,045
4,908
33,864
7,532
16,603
35,642
4,329
9,283
1,047
359
4,828
63,903
41,073
$ 1,154,866
1,320,157
251,148
188,814
125
6,413
8,728
4,108
4,484
5,270
327
2,258
33,113
$ 24,663
$ 33,750
$ 17,638
32,750
502
1,107
2,376
2,956
$ 105,250
30,000
1,688
27,850
24,763
29,088
37,438
2,763
26,063
13,849
141,976
720,053
19,476
19,476
19,476
22,176
22,176
22,176
Annual O&M
Cost
($)
Present Value
(2004 Vs)
22,176
22,176
1,806,402
565,177 1
298,865
500,903
4,260
2,738
76,991
$
88,010
•
16,743
12,588
671,416
1,451,332
181,768
53,700
727,855
19,000
34,813
24,663
$ 29,675
11303,047
620,385
679,219
801,536
14,306
146,661
768,361
557,305
686,730
363,143
35,745
$ 7,541
7,543
608,633
815,819
2,439,900
$ 305,579
50,206
353,418
32,625
24,363
679,663
801,631
195,468
157,563
161,313
91,809
195,305
369,198
7,688
7,793
7,722
7,609
7,725
7,586
55,472
7,890
8,245
113,088
3,039,361
25,792
25,795
33,452
33,661
33,520
62,538
63,224
64,198
3,510,235
751,874
1,342,139
$ 662,006
724,787
855,310
458,333
650,351
421,398
11,843,366
13,574,170
3,825,223
2,585,949
53,574
594,146
97,968
$ 208,407
393,967
18
898
4,636
3,453
4,725
556,908
2,469
4,585
6,125
14,735
$ 1,680
693,983
$ 449,669
14,146,647
15,953,049
3,947,546
3,142,114
236
3,899
2,620
14,602
180,578
913,197
666,216
742,833
391,591
674,874
3,467
4,072
5,241
387
3,649
5 1,064
$ 1,950
3,453
1,662
4,568
229,535
63,859
895,507
1,415,693
764,272
848,570
1,019,991
66,385
461,146
136,634
83,000
196,088
58,500
58,622
277,252
514,177
512,197
841,049
564,232
18,492,425
5,661,185
3,543,895
1,986,518
3,339,625
2,574,737
Pape 1 of 1
CO1 JMH Deep Sew,' Alternative Magno6a Service Area 16-May-04 als
Printed: 8142004
Table 8.2 Alternative No. 1
Continue Development of the Service Area
With Shallow Gravity Sewer and Numerous Small Lift Stations
CITY OF PEARLAND
2020 - CIP WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN
Construction Cost Estimating Workbook
Order of Magnitude
PROJECT NUMBER : U0285
SCENARIO : Shallow System Alternative - Extend 36-inch Sanitary Sewer at Magnolia and Veterans along Magnolia to State Highway 35 and along Veterans to Bailey
SERVICE AREA : SWEC
Subbasin : Veterans Dnve
PRESENT VALUE : $ 21,388,795
ESTIMATE DATE: 15-Feb-04
Construction Costs Adjustment
Dec-03 6782
May-04 7065
Construction Cost Adjustment: 4.2%
Number of Years: 0.34
Present Value Factors
Average Inflation Rate:
Municipal Bond Rate:
Period in Years:
Difficulty Factor:
5
Facility Location
Capacity
(mgd or
mill. g)
Diameter
(inches)
Length
(feet)
(feet)
Depth
Unit
Prices
•ig
-o
-"ay
Manhole
Unit
(S)
Price
Manhole
Cost
($)
Odor
Cost
($)
Control
Construction
($)
Cost
Capital
Cost Adjustments
Right
Cost
of
($)
Way
Capital
Cost
(2004 $'s)
Capital
At Construction
($)
Cost
Annual
Cost
($)
O&M
Present
(2004
Value
S's)
Basic
Engineering
Services
10.0%
Special
Engineering
Services
7.0%
City's Legal and
Adminlstralon
5.0%
Construction
Management
8.0%
Construction
Contingencies
15.0%
Commissioning
and Start-up
1.0%
Total
(ac)
(type)
($Ift2)
Construction
Year
At/Along
From
To
Facility
Description
Treatment
Plants
1
�S
Treatment
Plant
Subtotal:
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
-
$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Lift
Stations
2006
New John Lizer Lift Station
New Lift Station
6.56
0.56
4
$ 5.00
$ 92,222
$ 687442
$ 68,744
$ 48,121
$ 34,372
$ 54,995
$ 103,116
$ 6,874
$ 121,968
$ 1,125,633
$ 1,194,184
$ 26,523
$ 2,167,437
2006
New Pearland
Parkway
Lift
Station
New
Lift
Station
0.56
0.42
4
$ 5.00
$ 84,097
$ 164,600
$ 16,460
$ 11,522
$ 8,230
$ 13,168
$ 24,690
$ 1,646
$ 91,476
$ 331,791
$ 351,997
$ 10,968
$ 746,496
2010
New Bailey
Road
Lift Station
New
Lift Station
5.40
0.56
4
5 5.00
$ 90,651
$ 598,776
$ 59,878
$ 41,914
$ 29,939
$ 47,902
$ 89,816
$ 5,988
$ 121,968
$ 996,182
$ 1,189,493
$ 23,764
$ 1,820,319
2015
LS 23 Magnolia Street at Weatherford
Chance
Collar Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.11
0.42
$ 20,960
S 2,096
$ 1,467
$ 1,048
$ 1,677
$ 3,144
$ 210
$ 30,602
$ 42,360
$ 7,710
$ 338,050
2020
LS 19 McLean Road at Springfield
Springfield
Litt Station Rehabilitation
0.19
0.42
$ 33,031
$ 3,303
$ 2,312
$ 1,652
$ 2,642
$ 4,955
$ 330
$ 48,225
$ 77,387
$ 8,020
$ 368,097
2020
LS 20 Veterans Drive at
Springfield
Lift Station
Rehabilitation
0.28
0.42
$ 45,822
$ 4,582
$ 3,208
$ 2,291
$ 3,666
$ 6,873
$ 458
$ 66,900
$ 107,355
$ 8,354
$ 397,872
2020
LS 21 Veterans at Magnolia
Oaks
Veterans
Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.32
0.42
$ 51,595
$ 5,160
$ 3,612
$ 2,580
$ 4,128
$ 7,739
$ 516
$ 75,329
$ 120,880
$ 8,507
$ 411,384
2020
LS 24 State Highway 35 at Swensen
Swensen
Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.16
0.42
$ 29,073
$ 2,907
$ 2,035
$ 1,454
$ 2,326
$ 4,361
$ 291
$ 42,446
$ 68,113
$ 7,917
$ 358,935
2020
LS 49 Veterans Drive at Cobblestone
Cobblestone
Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.40
0.42
$ 61,634
$ 6,163
$ 4,314
$ 3,082
$ 4,931
$ 9,245
$ 616
$ 89,986
$ 144,401
$ 8,775
$ 434,974
2020
LS 52 Veterans Drive at Middle School
Lift Station
Rehabilitation
0.32
0.42
$ 51,077
$ 5,108
$ 3,575
$ 2,554
$ 4,086
$ 7,661
$ 511
$ 74,572
$ 119,666
$ 8,493
$ 410,169
2020
LS 54 Pearland Parkway at High School
Pearland
Parkway Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.52
0.42
$ 75,606
$ 7,561
$ 5,292
$ 3,780
$ 6,048
$ 11,341
$ 756
$ 110,385
$ 177,136
$ 9,153
$ 467,977
2020
LS Eagle Lift Station
Eagle
Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.11
0.42
$ 21,438
$ 2,144
$ 1,501
$ 1,072
$ 1,715
$ 3,216
$ 214
$ 31,300
$ 50,227
$ 7,722
$ 341,349
2020
LS 66 McLean Road at Caprock
Park
Village Lift Station Rehabilitation
0.94
0.42
$ 122,231
5 12,223
$ 8,556
$ 6,112
$ 9,778
$ 18,335
$ 1,222
$ 178,457
$ 286,372
$ 10,440
$ 579,255
Lift Stations:
Lift Station Subtotal
$
266,970
$ 1,963,285
$ 196,329
$ 137,430
$ 98,164
$ 157,063
$ 294,493
$ 19,633
$ 335,412
$ 3,201,808
Force
Mains
1
1
Force Main
Subtotal:
$
-
$ - $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
S -
S -
$ -
$ -
1
$ - I
S -
Collection
System
System A
2005
Veterans Drive Lift Station
18
Gravity
Sewer
13 7
36
10
12
$ 11916
0.00%
$ 1,026
• :
i i
i 720
2005
Veterans Drive
Magnolia
(18)
Cobblestone
Gravity
Sewer
1108.92
i
•
•
r
i
$ 9,229
i
2005
Veterans Drive
Cobblestone
i i
Springfield
Gravity
Sewer
i
1
98.04
•
r
i
i
$ 28,722
$ 20 105
$ 14 361
$ 22,978
$ 43,083
$ 2 872
$ 33,113
$ 449 581
$ 463068
•
2006
Veterans Drive
S • rin. field
25
Gravit
Sewer
7.9
30
1,973
8
$ 76,28
0.45
• i •
$ 171,912
$ 17,191
$ 12,034
$ 8,596
$ 13,753
$ 25,787
$ 1,719
$ 24,663•
i
402,857
2010
Bailey Road
Bailey
(9)
McLean
Gravity
Sewer
4.1
24
2,700
15
$ 124.17
0.62
1
$ 1.25
$ 6,251
$ 31,255
$ 366,501
$ 36,650
$ 54,975
$ 3,665
$ 33,750
$ 565,177
$ 674 850
2010
McLean Road
Bailey
Gravity
Sewer
i
i
$ 29,093
i
System B
2010
Bailey Road
(Future)
Veterans Drive
(9)
Wells
Road
Gravity
Sewer
2.3
18
2,620
17
$ 113.91
0.60
• r r
$ 16,143
$ 25,829$
48,430
$ 3 229
$ 32,750
i • r
• : 104
2010
Wells Road
Bailey
(6)
i_•
i
Gravity
Sewer
2 3
18
3,500
0.80
t 301i
$ 64,931
$ 4 329
$ 43,750
801,706
System C
2020
Veterans Drive
Bailey
(9)
Gravity
Sewer
2 3
18
8,420
13
$ 101 • i
$ 139,250
105,250
2020
CR 935
Veterans Drive (121)
Dead
Gravity
Sewer
1 6
15
2,400
i
667
104,668i.
$ 15,700
$ 1,047i
r r r
1,680
System D
2005
Veteran Drive Connection to SWEC
Veterans Drive (18)
Gravity
Sewer
7 9
30
0.03
108
$ 2,411
$ 1 688
i
$ 3,616
•
•
36,643
Gravity Sewer
Veterans Drive
Gravity
Sewer
i
i22,604
i
904
• i
$ 49,081
r
• • :300
2005
Magnolia
(38)Railroad
•
2005
Magnolia Gravity Sewer
Railroad
Tunnels
7 9
30
1 925
10
0.34
2
$ 2.50
7,601
: i
i••
$ 43,642
$ 69,827$
130,926
$ 8 728
$ 37,425
$ 1
303,047i
i
2006
State Highway 35
Magnolia
(19)
School
Access
(47)
Gravity
Sewer
7 9
30
1,981
15
$ 173 ' •
0.45
i 0'
$ 55,443
$ 3,696
$ 24,763
$ 560,709
•
687,407
2006 .
State Highway 35
School
Access
(47)
•
Gravity
Sewer
i
r
r
i29,005
'
•
i
$ 56,83829,088
i
072
2006
State Highway 35
Oiler
(52)
Gravity
Sewer
7 9
30
2,995
9
$ 109 40
i
i •
$ 359 771
$ 35,977
$ 25 184
$ 17 989
$ 28,782
$ 53,966
State Highway 35
Industrial West (56)
Gravity
Sewer
i i
• i
• i
r: i
:
$ 3,241
i
' •
2006
• i
State Hi! hwa 35
Industrial East
(3)
Gravi
Sewer
4.1
24
2,085-
0.48
• • •
21,404
$ 2,140
$ 1,498
$ 1,070
$ 1,712
$ 3,211
$ 214
$ 26,063
$ 57,099
$ 91,626
$ 3,649
$ 170,831
System E
2006 :
Industrial West
State Highway 35
(3)
Dead
Gravity
Sewer
0.5
1,520
6
$ 28.43
i7,000
50,213
5 5,021$
4,017
$ 7,532
$ 502
19,000
809
• i i
r
System F
2006
Industrial East
State Highway 35
(56)
Dead
Gravity Sewer
1 i
12
2,785
6
$ 34.72
i
14,001
i • •
i • %
$ 7 748
$ 5,534
$ 8,855
$ 16,603
$ 1,107
$ 34,813
$ 195,305i
i
i
System G
2010
High School Gravity Sewer
State Highway 35
(41
Pearland
Gravity Sewer
2.3
18
1,973
10
$ 76.23
i45
1
$ 1.25
$ 3,834
$ 15,337
165,733
$ 16,573
$ 11,601
$ 8,287
$ 13,259
$ 24,860
$ 1,657
•.379,049
System H
2010
State Highway 35
Magnolia
(19)
Gravity Sewer
1 1
12
2,374
13
$ 104.44
0.54
1
$ 1.25
$ 2 933
$ 14,667•
i
% 382i
$ 21,006
$ 39,390
$ 2,626
$ 29,675
$ 410,441•
i r ::
$ 1,662
$ 452 001
S stem I
2006
John Lizer
State Highway 35
(19)
Pearland
Parkway
(129)
Gravity
Sewer
2.3
18
2,610
13
$ 127.53
0.60
1
$ 1.25
$ 4,284
$ 21,422
$ 354,272
$ 35,427
$ 24,799
$ 17,714
$ 28,342
$ 53,141
$ 3,543
$ 32,625
$ 546,319
$ 579,590
$ 4,568
$ 715,097
2006
Pearland Parkway
Pearland Parkway (129)
Marys Creek
(133)
Gravity Sewer
2.3
18
1,949
9
$ 74.44
0.45
1
$ 1.25
$ 3,684
$ 14,737
$ 159,828
$ 15,983
$ 11,188
$ 7,991
$ 12,786
$ 23,974
$ 1,598
$ 24,363
$ 256,113
$ 271,710
$ 3,411
$ 383,607
Collection System Subtotal:
$ -
$ 6,355,490
$ 635,549
$ 444,884
$ 317,775
$ 508,439
$ 953,324
$ 63,555
S
679,663
$ 9,895,123
$ 11,703,882
$ 83,000
$ 12,546,481
GRAND TOTAL:
$ 266,970
$ 8,318,775
$ 831,878
$ 582,314
$ 415,939
$ 665,502
$ 1,247,816
$ 83,188
$ 1,015,075
$ 13,096,931
$ 15,633,454
$ 229,346
$ 21,388,795
2000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
2005
$ -
$ 1,579,746
$ 157,975
$ 110,582
$ 78,987
$ 126,380
$ 236,962
$ 15,797
$ 106,613
$ 2,397,245
$ 2,469,162
$ 12,306
$ 2,870,680
2010
$ 90,651
$ 2,343,296
$ 234,330
$ 164,031
$ 117,165
$ 187,464
$ 351,494
$ 23,433
$
304,193
$ 3,707,959
$ 4,427,497
$ 46,782
$ 5,248,018
2015
$
-
$ 20,960
$ 2,096
$ 1,467
$ 1,048
$ 1,677
$ 3,144
$ 210
$ -
$ 30,602
$ 42,360
$ 7,710
$ 338,050
2020
$ -
$ 1,545,912
$ 154,591
$ 108,214
$ 77,296
$ 123,673
$ 231,887
$ 15,459
$ 161,313
$ 2,407,799
$
3,863,811
$ 97,446
$ 5,899,927
S iPro}ect s VU 02851E rig R pl s1
001-JMH Do Neth4g Alternative Magnolia Service Area 16•MayO4. is
Page 1 of 1
Orignated: 12/2003
Printed: 8/4F2 4