Loading...
R2002-0093 06-10-02 RESOLUTION NO. R2002-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS,APPROVING WORK AUTHORIZATION#6 SUPPLEMENT#2 FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE BAILEY ROAD/OILER DRIVE PROJECT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS: Section 1. That certain contract by and between the City of Pearland and Turner, Collie and Braden, Inc., ("T C & B)for Program Management of the Pearland Mobility and Drainage Bond Program was authorized by the City Council on December 10, 2001. Section 2. That T C & B has developed work authorization #6 Supplement#2, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 3. That work authorization#6 Supplement#2 for environmental services associated with the Bailey Road/Oiler Drive Project is hereby approved. PASSED,APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 10 day of June A.D., 2002. TOM R D MAYOR ATTEST: ctreo,. • Y• NG G SE ' 'ETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: DARRIN M. COKER CITY ATTORNEY Turner Collie Braden Inc. 5/30/2002 EXHIBIT A FEE SCHEDULE Pearland Mobility&Drainage Bond Program Work Authorization No.6 Supplement No.2 Summary Project Bailey/Oiler Road Improvements Engineering Services Previous Current • Authorization Authorization Hydrologic&Hydraulic Environmental Compliance Harding ESE $ - $ 110,012.00 Topographic Survey C. L. Davis&Company $ 308,400.00 $ - Geotech HVJ Associates, Inc $ 131,560.00. $ - ROW Maps&Documents - PS&E - ROW Acquisition Assistance - Materials Testing $ - $ - Subtotal $ 439,960.00 $ 110,012.00 Total to Date $ 549,972.00 • Page 1of1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE STUDIES • Harding ESE will conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) along the proposed corridor for Bailey/Oiler Road that includes property or right-of-way acquisition. The scope of work will include a modified ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Standard Practice E 1527-00, with records search modifications. The modifications will include limiting the agency database records review to a 500-foot radius of the project alignment or area for all records except the National Priorities List(NPL), the RCRA Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD)Facility database,landfills and the Texas Hazardous Waste Sites (TWS) database. The records for the NPL, RCRA,TSD, landfills and TWS databases will be reviewed for an area within one mile of the subject property.. In addition,the historical use of the properties will be assessed based on the historical aerial photographs, historical topographic maps, and Sanborn fire insurance maps. In addition, the Phase I ESA will also include a review of fault maps, oil and gas well records, and preparation and issuance of a draft and final versions of the report. The assumptions used in developing the scope of work for this project are detailed below. • If access is required, arrangements for access to the properties along the right-of-way will be made by Turner Collie &Braden Inc.prior to the site visit. • If available,Turner Collie &Braden, Inc. will provide a copy of any previous environmental reports. • Interviews will not be conducted with residential property owners. Site interviews will be performed during the site visit and will be limited to the available personnel at each commercial property where access is obtained prior to the site reconnaissance. • Two copies of the draft report will be provided to Turner Collie &Braden, Inc. and,upon receipt of comments, six copies of the final report will be provided. • The scope of work covers only Phase I ESA. Upon completion of the Phase I ESA, Harding ESE will provide recommendations for Phase II activities, if necessary. The Scope of Work for the Phase II ESA would be negotiated as an additional service in a supplemental agreement. • The draft reports will be provided within 45 days after receiving authorization to proceed, and the final reports will be provided within ten days of receiving comments. Item 1: Records Review Based on maps that detail the boundaries of the project area and any properties that will be acquired, available historical aerial photographs and historical topographic maps for 5 to 10 year intervals dating back to the 1940s or 1950s, will be obtained for review. Local fault maps will also be obtained and reviewed. This historical information will be supplemented with Sanborn fire insurance maps. Oil and gas exploration maps will be obtained from commercial vendors and Texas Rail Road Commission. Well records will be obtained and reviewed, as appropriate. A-1 to review and discuss any additional concerns that were identified during the Phase I ESA.During this meeting,recommendations for Phase II ESA activities would be provided. The Scope of Work and budget for Phase II ESA would be negotiated as an additional service in a supplemental agreement. SECTION 404 COMPLIANCE Harding ESE will perform a reconnaissance level investigation or complete preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) to meet the requirements of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) where the project has the potential to impact jurisdictional waters of the United States, including wetlands. The appropriate Section 404 permits that would be required for the project would be identified. The Scope of Work for Phase II Permitting activities including the notification and/or application for the permits would be negotiated as an additional service and cost in a supplemental agreement. PHASE I-WETLAND DELINEATION A. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination 1. Field Delineation Prior to the fieldwork, the centerline (where appropriate) and right-of-way (ROW) boundaries must be staked in the field by others. Harding ESE will obtain right-of- entry. The field effort and approach will follow the requirements of the USACE- Galveston District as specified by their Enforcement Section. Identification of potential jurisdictional wetlands will be based upon the routine determination methodology published in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1), as amended by the USACE memoranda dated 23 and 27 August, 1991 and March 6, 1992, and Questions &Answers to the 1987 Manual, 16 September, 1991, and 7 October, 1991. This methodology includes documentation of the changes of both wetland and upland communities with representative data points (soil stations). The following parameters will be documented on the field data forms as required by the USACE manual. Soils. Work will consist of establishing locations for soil stations utilizing data from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soils reports and available aerial photography of the area. Soil stations will be sampled with augers or soil probes to depths of 16 inches or more depending upon NRCS and USACE guidance on what should be discernible in the soil profile. Soils at each of the proposed stations will be examined and compared with NRCS descriptions and hue/value/chroma using the Munsell color chart. These data will be recorded on field data forms. Vegetation. Dominant vegetation in an area around the soil station as specified by the federal manual will be identified according to species. These data will be recorded on field data forms. Hydrology. Field indicators of inundation and/or saturation as specified by the federal manual will be the focus of the determination of whether wetland hydrology is present. This information will be recorded on the data forms. • A-3 . t Staking and Surveying of Wetland Boundary. Following USACE—Galveston District guidance for linear projects, the entire ROW will be investigated for wetland areas. Each soil station will be marked in the field to indicate its location and the location will be surveyed. The wetland boundaries will be staked in the field to allow for subsequent surveying. The wetlands flagged in the field will need to be re-flagged just before the USACE verification, especially in areas that have a.high potential of disturbance because of weather, animals, or human activities. The preliminary surveyed wetland boundaries will be located on a map of the ROW and sealed or certified by the surveyor. The location of the ROW boundaries will be required for any wetlands that are adjacent or cross these boundaries. Photos will also be taken of the areas around soil stations. If field access is not possible on all proposed ROW parcels, Harding ESE will utilize (but will not be limited to) other available resources such as soil surveys, infrared photography, topographic maps, and national wetlands inventory data to delineate potential wetlands within the project area. Windshield surveys or other remote sensing techniques will be used to validate the size, classification, and location of wetlands identified through these other resources. 2. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Report Preparation The consultant will prepare the PJD report for study area. A PJD report will include the following: • Short description of the project,methods/sampling procedures, and results as required by USACE—Galveston District • Acreage of the project area investigated with boundaries indicated • Preliminary wetland delineation map on a recent infrared aerial photograph • Transects indicated on the delineation map • Data forms for each change in dominant vegetative community within the boundaries of the proposed ROW(for both wetlands and uplands) • Location (surveyed) of each observation point/data point on delirieation.map • Preliminary acreage of each wetland and total potential jurisdictional areas (all waters of United States, including wetlands) Harding ESE will submit a copy of the PJD report to the City for review and comment. After incorporating the review comments and upon City approval, Harding ESE will submit the report to USACE on the City's behalf asking the USACE—Galveston District for their concurrence on the report. B. USACE Verification Verification of the PJD will be requested by the consultant from the USACE-Galveston District. It is anticipated that the USACE would require at least six site visits to verify the PJD and Harding ESE will accompany the USACE on site visits. USACE requests for changes in wetland A-4 boundaries will be identified in the field and surveyed and included in the final sealed survey map. C. Field Review of Wetland Function and Value Harding ESE will prepare a RAPID wetland evaluation that documents the actual function and value of the wetlands within the project ROW. This review of the function and value is needed for the mitigation design and to show in the permit(s) that the mitigation replaces the `function and value' of the wetlands that will be filled. The consultant will use the USACE's Wetland Functions and Values:A Description Approach method that has been used with other permit(s) in the USACE —Galveston District. This method quickly assesses 13 functions: • Groundwater Recharge/Discharge • Floodflow Alteration • Fish and Shellfish Habitat • Sediment/Toxicant Retention • Nutrient Removal • Production Export • Sediment/Shoreline Stabilization • Wildlife Habitat • Recreation • Educational Scientific Value • Uniqueness/Heritage • Visual Quality/Aesthetics • Endangered Species Habitat Representative photographs of each wetland type will be taken to be included in the final report and permit(s)where necessary. PHASE II-PERMITTING Phase II of 404 Compliance will consist of those activities associated with the preparation of permit application packages for the permits required for construction. The scope of services necessary to perform this Phase will be provided. The Scope of Work for Phase II Permitting activities including the notification and/or application for the permits would be negotiated as an additional service in a supplemental agreement. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NEPA 1) Harding ESE will prepare an Environmental Assessment(EA) in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) and the requirements of TxDOT and Federal Highway Administration Technical Advisory 6640.8A for the portion of the proposed corridor from west of A-5 existing Bailey Road pavement to Nolan Ryan Expressway (Hwy 288) (approximately one mile). The EA will also cover the affected portion of the Nolan Ryan Parkway from Southfork Road to Croix Road. The scope of services will include the following general tasks: Identify and Confirm Issues Within the Project Area A. Collect data from existing data sources and by conducting a site visit. Existing data sources will include maps,inventories and records related to environmental concerns, such as wetlands, hazardous waste, and historic properties.This effort will assist with identifying environmental constraints during preliminary schematic development. B. Develop a constraints map showing features that could possibly affect route selection. The map will be based on a compilation of available information and will show the project study area. II. Meeting with Affected Property Owners - A. Prepare a mailing list of residents, businesses, and other property owners within the study area. B. Schedule, advertise, and conduct meetings with potentially affected property owners and other interested individuals or groups. C. Prepare a memorandum summarizing the public comments/questions recorded by Engineer's staff. III. Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment The applicable procedures of the National Environmental Policy Act and Federal Highway Administration Technical Advisory 6640.8A will be followed. A brief description of the proposed report format per TxDOT guidelines is as follows: • Cover Sheet • Table of Contents • Project Setting/Existing Environment • Description of the Proposed Action a. Roadway Construction b. Right-of-Way c. Utility Construction d. Project Funding • Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action/Reasonable Alternatives • Potential Social,Economic, and Environmental Impacts a. Socioeconomic Data b. Land Use c. Regional and Community Growth A-6 d. Public Facilities and Services e. Community Cohesion f. Environmental Justice g. Economic Impacts h. Conservation and Preservation i. Displacement of People, Businesses, and Farms. j. Water Quality—Section 404 Permits, Wetlands, Floodplains, SW3P, and Surface Water Hydrology k. Air Quality Analysis 1. Traffic Noise Analysis m. Vegetation Impacts n. Wildlife and Threatened/Endangered Species Impacts o. Section 4(f) Properties p. Prime Farmlands q. Archaeological/Historical Structures r. Construction Impacts s. Hazardous Waste/Materials • Secondary Impacts • Comments and Coordination—Description of public and agency comments and coordination. • Conclusion Exhibits will include photos, typical sections, layouts, and a project location map. Harding ESE will submit the preliminary draft EA to the City for review. A draft EA will then be prepared, incorporating changes and comments. The draft EA will then be submitted to TxDOT for review, if requested by the City. The EA will then be revised to address TxDOT comments. The scope of services for some of the elements of the EA is described in more detail below. A. Archaeological and Historical Structures Harding ESE will photograph all structures adjacent to the project ROW, and will provide them to TxDOT with a location map. Two views of each structure will be provided, with address if available. Section 106 and a Phase I archeological study will be preformed if required. If required, the scope of services necessary to perform Section 106 Coordination and an archeological study would be negotiated as an additional service in a supplemental agreement. B. Hazardous Materials/Waste • A Phase I ESA, as described previously in this Scope of Work, will be conducted to evaluate the potential for hazardous materials/waste. C. Endangered Species and Ecological Assessment The assessment of the relative impacts of the project alternatives will be based primarily on a review of aerial photography, topographic and soils maps, and field reconnaissance. This effort will be designed to provide pertinent biological information to support the alternatives analysis in the EA. Although it is not anticipated that this project would impact threatened or endangered species; if A-7 necessary, Section 7 consultation service would be negotiated as an additional service and budget in a supplemental agreement. D. Waters of the U.S., including Wetlands (for preferred alternative only) Harding ESE will identify and delineate the Waters of the.U.S. (including wetlands) potentially affected by the proposed project as described previously in this Scope of Work. E. Vegetation Survey and.Mitigation Plan TxDOT's memorandum of agreement with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department(TPWD)requires evaluation of project impacts to forested areas. If the preferred alternative affects these areas, a tree survey and mitigation plan may be required. This work would be negotiated as an additional service and budget in a supplemental agreement. F. 4f Analysis A 4f analysis would be negotiated as an additional service in a supplemental agreement if the preferred alternative impacts a park or any other 4f property. IV. Public Hearing After completion and preliminary approval of the Draft Final EA and the approval of the schematic design,Harding ESE will support the City if a public hearing is requested. A. Prepare a mailing list of residents, businesses and other property owners within the study area. B. Schedule, advertise, and conduct a public meeting with potentially affected property owners and other interested individuals or groups. The meeting will consist of an informal "open-house"prior to the TxDOT introduction. Assistance in answering questions and recording public comments will be provided. Harding ESE will provide assistance in preparing graphics and displays to be shown at the meeting. The workshop will be advertised twice in the two local newspapers prior to the meeting. A court reporter will be provided if requested by TxDOT. D. Prepare a memorandum summarizing the public comments/questions recorded by Harding ESE's staff. V. Prepare Final Environmental Assessment After the public hearing and the approval of the preliminary schematic design, Harding ESE will prepare the Final EA. This work will include incorporating information on the public hearing, and responding to public comments. A-8 ATTACH1VIENT D WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 6 SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 This Work Authorization is made pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Pearland Mobility & Drainage Bond Program, hereinafter identified as the `Contract', entered into by and between the City of Pearland ( `City"), and Turner Collie & Braden Inc. ("Engineer). P ART 1. Work Authorization No. 6, Supplement No. 2 is related to Baily/Oiler Road Improvement Project. The Engineer will perform Environmental services under this Authorization. P ART 2. The maximum amount payable for services under this Work Authorization is $110,012.00. This amount is based on the attached fee proposal submitted by Harding ESE dated May 28, 2002. P ART 3. Payment to the Engineer for the services established under this Work Authorization shall be "Lump Sum". P ART 4. This Work Authorization shall become effective on June 11, 2002 and shall teuminate on November 12, 2005, unless extended by a supplemental work authorization. P ART 5. This Work Authorization does not waive the parties' responsibilities and obligations provided under the contract. P ART 6. This Work Authorization is hereby accepted and acknowledged below. ENGINEER CITY OF PEARLAND By: By: Typed or Printed Name Typed or Printed Name Title Title Date Date LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A — Fee Schedule Exhibit B — Work Schedule Harding ESE May 28, 2002 Harding ESE, Inc. Proposal No.: 41370.01.1 Mr. James Keller, P. E Turner Collie& Braden Inc. P.O. Box 130089 Houston, Texas 77219-0089 RR Proposal for Environmental Compliance Studies — City of Pearland Dear Mr. Keller: 9800 Richmond Ave. Suite 200 Houston, Texas Telephone: 713/789-8050 Fax: 713/789-1029 Home Page: www.mactec.com Harding ESE is pleased to submit the attached proposal for subconsultant services for environmental compliance studies for Bailey/Oiler Road in Pearland Texas. We understand that the studies will consist of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA); Section 404 Compliance activities; and Environmental Assessment (EA). The Scope of Work was developed based on a meeting with Turner Collie & Braden Inc on May 15, 2002 and the various guidances that were provided for the completion of individual components. Harding ESE has utilized the experience of past projects to assist in determining reasonable cost estimates for the various tasks that will be required for the successful and defensible documentation of the potential impacts that may arise as a consequence of the implementation of the project. Cost were based upon the following assumptions: Phase I ESA • If access is required, arrangements for access to the properties along the right-of-way will be made by Turner Collier & Braden Inc. prior to the site visit. • If available, Turner Collie & Braden Inc. will provide a copy of any previous environmental reports. • Interviews will not be conducted with residential property owners. Site interviews will be performed during the site visit and will be limited to the available personnel at each commercial property where access is obtained prior to the site reconnaissance. • The scope of work covers only Phase I ESA. Upon completion of the Phase I ESA, Harding ESE will provide recommendations for Phase II activities if necessary. The Scope of Work for Phase II ESA would be negotiated as an additional service in a supplemental agreement. • Two (2) copies of the draft report will be provided to Turner Collie & Braden Inc. and, upon receipt of comments, six (6) copies of the final report will be provided. • The draft reports will be provided within 45 days after receiving authorization to proceed, and the final reports will be provided within ten days upon receiving comments. May 30, 2002 Mr. James Keller, P. E. Turner Collie & Braden Inc. Page 2 Section 404 Compliance • Prior to the fieldwork, the centerline (where appropriate) and right-of-way (ROW) boundaries will be staked in the field by others. • The study area for Section 404 Compliance will be limited to 500 feet from the proposed centerline. • Turner Collie & Braden Inc. will obtain ROW entry for Harding ESE's field crew. Environmental Assessment (NEPA) • The study area for the EA will be limited to the portion of the proposed corridor from west of existing Bailey Road pavement to Nolan Ryan Expressway (Hwy 288) (approximately one mile). The EA will also cover the affected portion of the Nolan Ryan Parkway from Southfork Road to Croix Road. • If available, Turner Collie & Braden Inc. will provide a copy of any previous environmental reports. • The range of the project alternatives to be examined in the EA will include the No Action and one Build Alternative. • The EA will follow the content and format in accordance with the Texas Department of Transportation guidance for environmental documentation. • Harding ESE will receive from Turner Collie & Braden Inc. the digital files that include the project area and study alternatives Noise Modeling efforts will utilize the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model 1.1 (TNM 1.1) • Six (6) copies of the draft report will be provided to Turner Collie & Braden Inc. and upon receipt of comments, ten (10) copies of the final report will be provided. The estimated cost effort for the entire project effort is $110,012. Individual tasks and associated scope and labor hours are provided in the attached spreadsheet. Once again, Harding ESE appreciates the opportunity to work with Turner Collie & Braden Inc. on this project. Please feel free to call Keith Dias at (713) 789-8050 or Rhonda Boyer at (713) 974- 9615 if you have any questions or comments regarding the labor hour and cost submittal Sincerely, HARDING ESE, INC. i Keith G. Dias Principal Attachments Rhonda Boyer Environmental Planning Manager Harding ESE 1 MAC TEC CC.t vvV The following environmental regulatory agency records will be reviewed: Federal Records Superfund (NPL) Site CERCLIS Site RCRA TSD Sites RCRA Generator Sites ERNS Sites State Records Superfund Sites (TX Haz. Waste) Leaking UST Sites Registered UST Sites Registered AST Site Landfill Sites Additional Records State Spills Voluntary Cleanup Program Records Fire Department Response Records Item 2: Site Reconnaissance Search Distance 1.0 mile 0.5 miles 1.0 mile 500 feet Target Property Search Distance 1.0 mile 500 feet 500 feet 500 feet 1.0 mile Search Distance Target Property 500 feet Key Maps After reviewing historical data, a site visit will be conducted. During the site visit, the portion of the street segment that can be readily accessed and the adjoining properties will be visually inspected for the (1) presence and management of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products, and (2) any obvious signs of environmental releases on the property. Structures identified within the right-of-way will be documented. Site interviews with commercial facility occupants, will be conducted during the site visit to obtain information on current and historical uses of the property. During the inspection field notes, copies of any pertinent facility and regulatory records, and site photographs will be obtained. Item 3: Environmental Site Assessment Report Upon reviewing all information obtained during the records review and the site visit, a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report will be prepared. The reports will clarify the scope of work and limitations and will detail the procedures and results Copies of relevant information will be included in the appendices. Two copies of the draft report will be provided. Upon receipt of comments, six copies of the final report will be provided. Phase II ESA Based on the results of the Phase I ESA, additional assessment may be recommended. If a Phase II ESA is determined to be necessary, Harding ESE will obtain prior authorization to clarify and confirm the scope of work for the Phase II ESA without incurring unnecessary delay in the project. A meeting will be scheduled after the submission of the site reconnaissance portion of the Phase I H-,rding ESE Cost Proposal for Baily/Oiler Road City of Pearland Page 1 of 3 Task Principal Env. Scientist (hours) Associate Level Scientist (hours) Senior Project Level Scientist (hours) Staff Scientist(hours) GIS/graphics (hours) Word Processor (hours) Contract Admin (hours) Total by Hours Task ; �' 'Yw, _.} ...,: RHASEi'ENVIRONMENTAL � .. SITE 5 ASSESSMENT , Kr .. F....- ^-':k: h.: ... p . t .,. �++- F>.-...a� .�Y i-.?, _.u�n�:�.IIxC..�:S , L , .. • 4. t_Syt {3S } n:,. , _ , ,. Fr`4 s+'i. s ,m�a :-.t- 2r.- ._:f `.'fit :>.. .'p` _:. h'...��...:.. '^'^'+rF,,.ya4.rviR�� �zs ..Y ,.., � :.. ,. .. r 1.0 Site Reconnaissance 4 8 25 25 25 87 2.0 Historical Document Review and Report Preparation 4 10 18 60 30 10 3 135 TOTAL HOURS 8 18 43 85 55 _ 10 3 222 Rate 147.74 102,14 84.02 54.84 88.86 44.61 56.90 ___ TOTAL LABOR $1,182 $1,838 $3 613 54 661 54,887 5446 $171 $16,799 EXPENSES SIMOIMIIIMINummat Local travel Field Vehicle $250 200 Global Positioning System $140 Regulatory Database Search (EDR) $645 Historical Aerial Photographs $76Historical Oil & Gas Records (Atlas Environmental) $250 $$15 Historical Topographic Maps $15 Historical Sanborn Map Search S50 Shipping maps, photo processing, miscellaneous expenses $300 Photocopying (Inc administrative record documents) and printing $300 TOTAL' ESTIMATED; COST FOR PHASE 1 ESA, _ _ ,., •, 1 s 19,709 5E CT10N.4 04.00 MPRIAN CE ter ,., �i �_ 4 > v x� _ s.y:. „.�. �am.-'�i, _.-.�-. , -?•��i-��_. ',"P�., 4 • lz.Y- _'�e'iY.,-"^��X.:.;-.rajs _ Y�r. �!M1v��,.^"fieg'"M�... -.}'A�.. �:e:,A,;. - k.,.. ..`Y...a?.,_ 1.0 General Reconnaissance Surveys& Delineation 100 100 200 2.0 Biological Assessment Report Production 2 20 80 16 32 150 3.0 Wetland Assessment Report Production 2 20 80 16 32 150 TOTAL HOURS 4 40 260 100 32 64 300 Rate 147.74 102.14 84.02 54.84 88.86 44,61 56.90 --- _ TOTAL LABOR $591 $4,086 $21,845 $5,484 $2,844 $3,642 $38,490 EXPENSES ��$0 Local travel $300 Field Vehicle $250 Field Equipment Global Positioning System $140 140 Shipping, maps, photo processing, miscellaneous expenses $300 Photocopying (Inc administrative record documents) and printing $1,100 '- x .' TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR 404,COMPI,IANCE - _1•1 �&1/4An. ,o,; _..ENVI O M E TAL SSESSMENT.INEPA �.5,.. ..._..x_.;._ ....'_.<,.. . '+.,.«.:a,..., y-��._..�., .. -.. , .,� .. � 1.0Description of Proposed Action ...' .,, 2.0 Purpose &Nedeed for the Proposed Action ,. ,.. 3.0 Environmental Constraints Data Collection and IS Mapping 4 4 4 20 4:0 Reasonable Alternatives :, 4 ti 4 ,5:0 Preliminary DraftE � _ .. .. � . , _ ,�, .. _ - _ _- �.. ., �.• ,r.� 5.1.1 Socioeconomics 2 2 0 4 5.1.2 Land Use 2 2 2 0 6 5.1.3 Regional and Community Growth 2 2 2 0 6 5.1.4 Public Facilities and Services 1 2 2 0 5 5.1.5 Community Cohesion 1 1 0 2 5.1.6 Environmental Justice 2 2 0 4 , Harding ESE Cost Proposal for Baily/Oiler Road City of Pearland Page 2 of 3 Task Principal Env. Scientist (hours) Associate Scientist Level (hours) Senior Project Level Scientist (hours) Staff Scientist(hours) GIS/graphics (hours) Word Processor (hours) Contract Admin (hours) Total by Task Hours Economic Impacts—©__©_©— 0 5 5.1.8 Conservation and Preservation _— 2 2 _©— 0 6 5.1.9 Displacement of People, Businesses and Farms --©IIIIIII 2 0 6 5.1.10 Water Surface Quality Water - Hydrology Section 404 Permits, Wetlands, Floodplains, SW3P, and allall q IMIIIIIIIIIIII 0 10 Quality5.1.11 Air -. 16 5.1.12 Traffic Noise Analysis 8 16 24 0 48 5.1.13 Vegetation -- 1 3 0 5 5.1.14 Wildlife and Species —l. 11.1111111a11111©_ 0 4 Threatened/Endangered Section 4(f) Properties —111_— 0 2 5.1.16 Prime Farmlands 0 2 5.1.17 Archeological/Historical Structures nIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4 4 16 5.1.18 Hazardous Waste/Materials 0 6 52•1 Environmental impact Analysis , .. 5 2 1 Socioeconomics 2 2 2 0 6 5.2.2 Land Use 2 2 2 0 5.2.3 Regional and Community Growth —_ 1 2 0 5 5.2.4 Public Facilities and Services -- 1 2 2 a 0 5 5.2.5 Community Cohesion 0 5 5.2.6 Environmental Justice --11111111, 0 3 Impacts 11111111111.11111111flin 4 0 10 Economic 5.2.8 Conservation and Preservation 1 0 2 5.2.9 Displacement of People, Businesses and Farms 2 2 0 6 5.2.10 Water Surface Quality Water - Hydrology Section 404 Permits, Wetlands, Floodplains, SW3P, and 2 4 0 8 5.2.11 Air Quality Analysis IIII— 16 16 111111.1011111111 0 64 5.2.12 Traffic Noise Analysis 8 16 24 0 48 5.2.13 Vegetation 2 1 0 3 5.2.14 Wildlife and Species 1 1 0 2 Threatened/Endangered 5.2.15 Section 4(f) Properties 1 1 0 2 5.2.16 Prime Farmlands 1 nail 0 2 5.2.17 Archeological/Historical StructuresMEI 4 0 8 5.2.18 Hazardous Waste/Materials 1 1 111111111111.111111111 0 3 5.2.19 Construction Impacts 1 11101.111 0 2 Seconda /Gummulatrve Impacts .� ., .� •._ ,,, :6 2 2 , , =`0 : �;; , .-7:0 Comments and Coordination. Agency g Y) ;:.; , , _ .., , .,�; :_,: _- �. � _ �= ..; 4 ,..;_.�-. �-__ .8 ..:: -. .._-=.8 : _ ,`-: . , _-=•� 8 , . ,, �.. � 4 6 (Public ( 7.1 Prepare Mailing List 8 8 0 16 7.2 Conduct Public Meeting 8 16 8 8 4 57 7.3 Organize and Respond to Public and Agency Comments . 8 8 0 24 :-. 8.0 Prepare Final EA _ _ ur .. 16 8 0 r 24 .. >..., :.� 9.0 Prepare FONSI "-> _.... .... ._..:. .. _ .. ...,_.• , ,_ , . . _, _ ,.,.,. t . Kam' - TOTAL HOURS 5 150 174 . 211 40 16 8 604 Rate TOTAL EXPENSES LABOR 147.74 $739 102.14 $15,321 84.02 $14,619 54 Inn 84 88.86 44.61 56.90 ...... $714 $455 $46,973 _ Local travel $250 Newspaper ads $1,000 Cost Proposal for Baily/Oiler Road City of Pearland Page 3 of 3 Harding ESE Task Shipping, maps, photo processing, miscellaneous expenses Photocopying (inc administrative record documents) and printing TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR NEPA .=TOTAL ESTIMATED COST Associate Level Scientist (hours) Senior Project Level Scientist (hours) Staff Scientist(hours) GIS/graphics Word Processor (hours) (hours) Contract Admin (hours) Principal Env. Scientist (hours) Total Hours by Task $300 $1,00I $49,523 CITY OF PEARLAND MOBILITY & DRAINAGE PROGRAM BAILY ROAD ID 1 0 ZR 10 11 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 38 Task Name Bally Road Preliminary Engineering Services Data Collection Field Reconnaissance Authorization -Survey Prep of Contracts Survey ROW Mapping Authorization-Geotech & ESA Prep of Contracts Authorization - Drainage Studies Prep of Contracts Geotech Studies Drainage Studies Phase I ESA Preliminary Design Review City of Pearland Final Design Authorization Prep of Contracts ROW Acquisition Design 30% Review 30% Design Design 60% Review 60% Design 90% Review 90% Complete Bid Documents ROW Acquisition Acquisition Advertize,Bid & Award Advertize Bid Pre Bid Confrence Receive Bids Recommend Award Award Construction Contract Construction Phase Notice to Proceed Construction Duration 1649 days 270 days 22 days 21 days 0 days 15 days 84 days 84 days 0 days 22 days O days 15 days 84 days 84 days 84 days 84 days 10 days 537 days 0 days 21 days 42 days 84 days 14 days 84 days 14 days 84 days 14 days 120 days 365 days ---------- 40 days O days 0days! 0 days 0 days 0 days', 900 days 0days' 900 days Start Mon 2/4/02 Mon 2/4/02 Mon 2/4/02 Fri 2/8/02'. Mon 2/11/02 Mon 2/11/02 Tue 4/16/02 Fri 4/26/02 Mon 6/10/02 Mon 6/10/02 Mon 6/24/02 Mon 6/24/02 Tue 7/2/02 Tue 7/9/02 Tue 7/2/02 Tue 7/30/02 Finish Predecessors Thu 8/10/06 Thu 10/31/02 Mon 2/25/02 Thu 2/28/02 3SS Mon 2/11/02 Mon 2/25/02 5 Mon 718/02 Thu 7/18/02 Mon 6/10/02 5FS+50 days Mon 7/1/02 9 Mon 6/24/02 Mon 7/8/02 11 Mon 9/23/02 10 Mon 9/30/02 , 12 Mon 9/23/02 10 Mon 10/21/02 7,13FF+21 days,l' Tue 10/22/02 Thu 10/31/02 16 Fri 7/19/02 Tue 1/6/04 Mon 11/18/02 . Mon 11/18/02 17FS+18 days Tue 11/19/02 Mon 12/9/02 19 Tue 11/19/02 Mon 12/30/02 19 Tue 11/19/02 Tue 2/11/03 Tue 2/25/03 Tue 5/20/03 Tue 6/3/03 Tue 8/26/03 Tue 9/9/03 Fri 7/19/02 Tue 1/6/04 Tue 1/6/04 Tue 1/27/04 Mon 2/2/04 Mon 2/9/04 Sun 2/15/04 Sun 2/22/04 Sun 2/22/04 Mon 2/23/04 Mon 2/10/03 19 Mon 2/24/03 22 Mon 5/19/03 23 Mon 6/2/03 24 Mon 8/25/03 25 Mon 9/8/03 26 Tue 1/6/04 27 Fri 7/18/03 8 Sun 2/15/04 Tue 1/6/04 28 Tue 1/27/04 31FS+21 days Mon 2/2/04 31FS+27 days Mon 2/9/04 33FS+7 days Sun 2/15/04 34FS+6 days Thu 8/10/06 Sun 2/22/04 35FS+7 days Thu 8/10/06 37 2002 Dec Jan Feb 1 Mar 'Apr 1 May j Jun 1 Jul ( Aug 1 Sep Oct f Nov t;:E:ill::::::::::::::::::: Ems:::::::: 2003 Dec Jan • • Feb l Mar j Apr 1 May 1 Jun • • 2004 Jul 1 Aug 1 Sep 1 Oct I Nov [ Dec Jan 1 Feb j Mar 1 Apr j May 1 Jun 1 Jul 404/15 +/22 Turner Collie & Braden Inc Protect 13-11256 Date: Thu 5/30/02 Task Split Progress Milestone Summary Rolled Up Task Rolled Up Split Rolled Up Milestone Rolled Up Progress External Tasks Project Summary i .`.' ._ a. Page 1 y 2003 Dec Jan • • Feb l Mar j Apr 1 May 1 Jun • • 2004 Jul 1 Aug 1 Sep 1 Oct I Nov [ Dec Jan 1 Feb j Mar 1 Apr j May 1 Jun 1 Jul 404/15 +/22 Turner Collie & Braden Inc Protect 13-11256 Date: Thu 5/30/02 Task Split Progress Milestone Summary Rolled Up Task Rolled Up Split Rolled Up Milestone Rolled Up Progress External Tasks Project Summary i .`.' ._ a. Page 1 y