Loading...
R2008-123 2008-08-08RESOLUTION NO. R2008-123 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE CITY'S INTEREST IN PARTICIPATING IN A PROPOSED SPORTS AND RECREATION COMPLEX IN PEARLAND, TEXAS AND RESOLVING OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZORIA § CITY OF PEARLAND § WHEREAS, USA Partners Sports Alliance ("UPSA") has proposed to the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Pearland, Texas (the "City") that the City develop aCity- owned sports and recreation complex to be named as the George & Barbara Bush Sports Complex (the "Project"), with UPSA serving as the manager of the Project pursuant to a multi- year management agreement (the "Management Agreement") with the City; WHEREAS, UPSA has made certain representations regarding the Project to the City, including a projection of anticipated revenues of the Project and the necessity of the City's participation in the Project in order to facilitate the financing thereof; WHEREAS, UPSA has also represented to the City that revenues generated from residual contracts with local hotels, (i.e. contracts with local hotels that provide such hotels will pay the City or UPSA a portion of the payments received from hotel room rentals generated as a result of the requirement by UPSA that participants at sporting and other events held at the Project rent hotel rooms at such local hotels (the "Residual Contracts")), sales taxes generated from sales occurring at the Project site and the sale of sponsorships as a result of the construction and operation of the Project (collectively, the "Project Revenues") will collectively be sufficient on a yearly basis to pay debt service on a series of taxable certificates of obligation proposed to be issued by the City (the "Certificates of Obligation") in an amount not to exceed $18 million for the construction of the Project; WHEREAS, if the Certificates of Obligation were issued by the City, it is the City's intent that debt service on such Certificates of Obligation be paid from Project Revenues; provided, however, that such Certificates of Obligation would be secured by a pledge of the City's ad valorem taxes and a limited subordinate pledge of certain City revenues; WHEREAS, UPSA has requested that the City express its willingness to participate in the Project, and the City Council desires to provide such an expression of interest subject to presentation of an acceptable definitive financing structure and acceptable financing terms, the fulfillment of certain conditions precedent to any financing of the Project and approval of all related financing and legal documents by the City's legal counsel and financial consultants. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS: HOU:2833728.4 Section 1. Preamble. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Resolution are hereby found and declared to be true and correct. Section 2. Description of Proposed Financing of the Project. UPSA has represented to the City that the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation in an amount not to exceed $18 million will be sufficient to (i) construct the Project and (ii) pay certain costs of issuance of the Certificates of Obligation and that upon construction of the Project, Project Revenues will be sufficient on a yearly basis to make debt service payments on the Certificates of Obligation for a term of no more than twenty (20) years. Section 3. Cit Ex ression of Interest. (i) By adoption of this Resolution, the City officially expresses its interest in the proposed Project and its willingness to consider issuing the Certificates of Obligation to fund construction of the Project, subject to the satisfactory fulfillment of the following conditions precedent relating to the Project within 6 months from the date of this Resolution: (a) execution of the Management Agreement relating to the Project between UPSA and the City in a form acceptable to the City in its sole discretion; (b) verification of estimated Project Revenues provided by UPSA to the City and an independent analysis of the viability of the Project by an independent third-party consultant retained by and acceptable to City in its sole discretion; (c) verification by the City's financial consultants that the estimated Project Revenues described in subsection (b) above, will be sufficient, on a yearly basis and at then prevailing market rates of interest, to make debt service payments on the Certificates of Obligation; (d) original executed copies of Residual Contracts in an amount sufficient, as determined by the City in its sole discretion, to generate that portion of verified estimated Project Revenues attributable to the Residual Contracts; (e) original executed copies of sponsorship agreements in a number sufficient, as determined by the City in its sole discretion, to generate that portion of verified estimated Project Revenues attributable to the such sponsorship agreements; (f) the commitment of George H.W. Bush and Barbara Bush, or the legally authorized representatives thereof, in a form acceptable to the City in its sole discretion, that George H.W. Bush and Barbara Bush will allow the Project to be named "The George & Barbara Bush Sports Complex" or otherwise bear their respective name or names in a form acceptable to the City in its sole discretion; and (g) the approval by the City, in its sole discretion, of the financing structure and financing terms for the Project (including, but not limited to, final interest rates, principal amounts, maturities, etc.) in connection with the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation. HOU:2833728.4 (ii) Upon the fulfillment of the conditions precedent described in Section 3(i) hereof, the City will give the proposed Project strong consideration and may at such time agree to the City's participation in the Project, including, but not limited to, the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation; provided, however, the City will be under no legal obligation to participate in the Project or issue the Certificates of Obligation at such time and may in its sole discretion determine not to do so. (iii) City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds reasonably necessary for the City to assist UPSA to fulfill the conditions precedent listed in Section 3(i) hereof, including without limitation the payment of consultants and advisors necessary for the City to evaluate the fulfillment of such conditions precedent. It is anticipated that each of the City and UPSA shall bear its own costs in connection with the fulfillment of the conditions precedent listed in Section 3(i) hereof. Other than as described in the first sentence of this Section 3(iii), and notwithstanding any provision above that may be construed to the contrary, nothing in this Resolution shall be construed as creating any financial obligation on the part of the City. Any and all services or other support to be provided by the City shall be subject to the appropriation of funds therefor by the City Council, either through the budget for the fiscal year in which such services or support are to be provided or otherwise. (iv) The City is required to comply with federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes in connection with the construction of the Project, including particularly procurement laws relating to the selection of a contractor to construct the Project. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to obligate the City to select or use UPSA as a contractor or subcontractor in connection with the construction of the Project. Section 4. Authorization of Other Matters Relating Thereto. The City Manager and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things necessary or desirable to carry out this Resolution including, but not limited to, directing the City's legal counsel, financial consultants and other consultants to review materials provided by UPSA relating to the conditions precedent described in section 3(i) hereof and the structure, financial terms and legal documentation for the proposed Project and the expenditure of funds necessary. Section 5. Public Meeting. It is officially found, determined and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time place and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given all as required by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, as amended. [signature page follows) 3 HOU:2833728.4 PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 8`" day of August, 2008. Mayor City of Pearland, Texas ATTEST: y Se ity of arland, exas S-1 HOU:2833728.4 City ofPenrland,Teias Park Bond Debt Service Comparison Funds Needed To Cover Debt Service S17,720,000 General Obligation Park Bonds. In idditlon to.General.Ohuigatinn.Park.Bondis.6h Fiscal Year Series 2009 $4,200,000 S4,200,000 S8;400;000 l00%of 90%of 75%0 of •60%of :50%of Ending Certificates of Series:2012 Series 2013 Total Revenues Reventes Revenues Revenues Revenues 9/30 Obligation Park Bonds Park Bonds Park Bonds Difference S1,683,122 .1,514,810 S 1,262;342 51,609,873 3841,561 '2009 $598,050 S0 * 2010. 1,641,100 1,043,050 " 640,072 640;072 640,072 640,072 640;072 2011 1,641;063 1,641;063 42,060 42,060 42,060 42,060 42,060 2012 1,639;000 S120,750 S120,750 1,518,250 104,872. (3,440) (255,9(19) 008,377) (676,689) 2013 1,630,913 241,500 S120,750 362,250 1,277,663i 405,460 237,147 (15,32i) (267;789). (436,102) . 2014 1;638,463 261,500 261,500 523;000 1,115,463 567,660 399,347 146;879 (105,589) (273;902) '2015 1,639,650 320,350 325,350 645,700 993,950 689,172 520;860 268,392 15,923 (152,389) 2016 1,638,138. 325,750 325,403 .651,213 986,925 .696,197 527;885 275,417 22,948 (145,364) 2017 1,638;925 325,575 325;288 650,863 988,063 695,060 526,747 274,279 21,811 (146,502) , 2018" 1,641;675 325,113 324,825 649,938 991,738 691,385. 523;072 270,604 18,136 (150,177) 2019 1,641,050 324;363 324,075 648,438 992,613 696,510 522,197 269;729 17,261 (151,052) 2020 1,642,050 328,325 328,033 656,363 .985,688 697,435 529,122 276,654 24,186 (144,127) 2021. 1,039,338 326,713 320,425 653,138 986,200 696,922 528,610 276;142 . 23,673 (144,639) 2022, . 1,637,913 324,813 324,525 649;338 988,575 694,547 526,235 273;767 21,298 (147,014) 2023 1,642,438 327;625 327,338 654,963 987,475 695,647 527,335 274,867 22,398 (145,914) 2024 1,642,238 324,863 324,575 649,438 902,800 690,322 52.2,010 269;542 17,073 (151,239) 2025 1,642,313 320,813 326,525 653,338 988,975 694.147 525;835 273;367 20,898 (147;414) 2026 1,642,325 328;188 327,900 656,088 986,238 696;885 528,572 276;104 23,636 (144,677) 2027 1,641;938 328;988 328,700 657,688 934,250 608,872 530,560 278,092 25;623. (142,689) 2028 1,640,813 324,213 323,925 648,138 992,675 690,447 522,135 269,667 17,198 (151,114), 2029 1,638;613 329;150 328,863 658,013 980,600 702,522 534,210 281,742 '29,273 (139,039p 2030 328,225 327,938 656;163 (65.6;163). 2031 320,125 326;438 •653,163 (653,163) 2032 324,650 324;363 649,0.13_ (649,013) 2033. 327,000. 3.26,7.13 '653;713 (653,713); " 2034 323,488 323,200 646,688 (646,688) 2035 319,400 319,113 638,5:13 (638,513) , 2036 319,738 319,450 639,188 (639,188) 2037 324,213 323,925 648,138 (648,138) 2038 322,538 317,250 639,788 (639,788) Total S33,407,000 S8,430,563 S8,182,450 516;613,013 S15,597,888 * Net debt service after Capitalized Interest. '°' Reduction of revenue:begins:in2012. ilsstiiiiptions: Series.2009 Series 2012;and 2013 Estimated Revenues: Taxable Certificates of Obligation'issue General Obligation Bond issues Sponsorships S860,000 Estimated Interest Rate:of 6.75% :Estimated Interest;Rates of 5,75%o Sales Tax• 67;122 Hotel,Residuals. 756,000, Total: $1,633,122, USA PARTNERS * SPORTS ALLIANCE The George & Barbara Bush Sports Complex Pearland, Texas Complex Sponsors Amount Term Naming.Rights $200,000 per year /0.year contract Turf licensing agreement 250,000 per year 10 year contract Field Sponsorships 250,000 per year 3 year contract Field Signage 120,000 per year 1 year. contract Beverage Sponsorship 40,000 per year - 5 yearcontract Total Complex Sponsors $860,000 per year Additional Revenue Sources: 1) sales tax increase 2) hotel;bed tax 3) hotel residuals 4) general economic impact 230 Canal Boulevard,Suite 3•;Poole Vedra Beach,FL 32082 usapsa @runail.cam• Phone(904):543-7285•Mobile(904)910-5318•-v.v w usapsa.com 3 it USA PARTNERS * SPORTS ALLIANCE , The George & Barbara Bush Sports Complex at Pearland,Texas August 19,2008 Mr. Frank Ildebrando First City Tower 1001 Fannin Street. Suite 1200 Houston, TX 77002-6708 Re: George& Barbara Bush Sports Complex Dear Frank, It was nice to talk to you yesterday. Per our conversation, I am addressing the questions you had pertaining to the revenue streams and projections on the proposed George and Barbara Bush Sports Complex in.Pearland. 1. The estimate for the sales tax is confirmed 2. Hotel Bed tax revenues will not be 100%of this number because of hotel availability in Pearland 3. We are very confident that the hotel residuals of$756,000.00 are.accurate. 4. No, other than the hotel bed tax numbers and the Sponsorship projections. (New Sponsorship projection of$860,000.00) 5. Yes, the sponsorships are renewable. Some are multi-year and some are annual. We are very confident that this project will help.Pearland become 'The Premier Youth Sports Destination' site in the country. We are very excited to get started marketing this to our national sponsors. Time is critical for us to begin preliminary design work and sponsorship sales.. 230 Canal Boulevard,Suite 3 • Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082 P 904.543.7285 • www.usapsa.com USA PARTNERS * SPORTS ALLIANCE Please let me know if you need any further.information. Regards, Tim Dulin (901)461 - 1909 230 Canal Boulevard,Suite 3 • Ponte Vedra Beach, FL'32082 P 904.543.7285 • www.usapsa.com City of Pearland,Texas Park Bond Debt Service Comparison S17,720,000 General Obligation Park Bonds Coverage Fiscal Year Series 2009 S4,200,000 $4,200,000 S8,400,000 Based On Ending Certificates of Series 2012 Series 2013 Total Estimated 9l30 Obligation Park Bonds Park Bonds Park Bonds Difference Revenues 2009 $598,050 $0 * 2010 1,641,100 1,043,050 * 1.614 2011 1,641,063 1,641,063 1.026 2012 1,639,000 $120,750 $120,750 1,518,250 1.109 2013. 1,639 913 241,500 $120,750 362,250 1,277,663 1.317 2014 1,638,463 261,500 261,500 523,000 1,115,463 1.509 2015 1,639,650 320,350 325,350 645,700 993,950 1.693 2016 1,638,138 325,750 325,463 651,213 986,925 1.705 2017 1,638,925 325,575 325,288 650,863 988,063 1.703' 2018 1,641,675 325,113 324,825 649,938 991,738 1.697 2019 1,641,050 324,363 324,075 648,438 992,613 1.696 2020 L,642,050 328,325 328,038 656,363 985,688 1.708 2021 1,639,338 326,713 326,425. 653,138 986,200 1.707 2022 1,637,913 324,813 324,525 649,338 988,5,75 1.703 2023 1,642,438 327,625 327,338 654,963 987,475 1.704 2024 1,642,238 324,863 324,575 649,438 ' 992,800 1.695 2025 1,642,313 326,813 326,525 653,338 988,975 1.702 2026 1,642,325 .328,188 327,900 656,088 986,238 1.707 2027 1,641,938 328,988 328,700 657,688 984,250 1.710 2028. 1,640813 324,213 323,925 648,138 992,675 L696 2029 1,638,613 329,150 328,863 658,013 980,600 1.716 2030 328,225 327,938 656,163 (656,163) 2031 326,725 326,438 653,163 (653,163) 2032 324,650 324,363 649,013 (649,013) 2033 327,000 326,713. 653,713 (653,713) 2034 323,488 323,200 646,688 (646,688) 2035 319,400 319,113 638,513 (638,513) 2036 319,738 319,450 639,188 (639,188) 2037 324,213 323,925 648,138 (648,138) 2038 322,538 317,250 639,788 . (639,788) Total S33,407,000 S8,430,563 S8,182,450: S16,613,013 S15,597,888 * Net debt service after Capitalized Interest. Assumptions: Series 2009 Taxable Certificates of Obligation issue Estimated Interest Rate of 6.75% Series 2012 and 2013 General Obligation Bond issues Estimated.Interest Rates of 5.75% Estimated Revenues: Sponsorships $860,000 Sales Tax 67,122 Hotel Residuals 756,000 Total: $1,683,122 • ".Jones,Gregg" To <BEisen@ci.pearlandax.us>,<cmantel@ci.pearlan.bLus>, rAfi <GreggJones@andrewskurt "ldebrando;,Frank"<Frank.ildebrando@rbccm.corn>, h.com> "O'Hara;Ryan"<Ryan OHara@rbccin.com• cc "Witte,Rick <RickWitte andrewskurth.com>- 08/13/200811:58 AM @ . • bcc Subject Pearland Sports Complextax:issues, History;, This message has been forwarded:• «Attachment (618595-1 08-13-2008 11-03-16 AM)'.PDF» Claire. and Gentlemen: I have looked at the attached schedules to identify revenues. that could be used to support tax-exempt debt and other structuring issues that- would maximize the amount of tax-exempt bonds that could be issued for the proposed Pearland Sports Complex, and I -have the following: observations: 1.. The revenues from the sale of-Naming Rights and other, sponsorships will give rise to private business use and will b:e private payments if received by the City or EDC, according to a private letter ruling issued by the IRS. They should be pledged to taxable debt which can be either obtained directly by the Developer or issued by the City or the EDC.. There is no tax advantage in having those payments. received by the City or EDC, as was suggested by someone during our conference call last month. In fact, it is preferable- from a tax standpoint for those • revenues to be received and controlled entirely by the Developer, as was done with the naming rights for Minute' Maid Park, which are.: completely the property of the Astros and are not used, to pay or secure. any of the bonds financing the Park. 2, Whether the sales revenues from the concessions, vending machines, gate admissions and merchandise will also treated as private payments will depend on the nature of the management contract between the Developer and the City or EDC.. If the management contract is a "qualified management. contract," within the meaning of Revenue. Procedure 97-13, then the sales revenues need not be treated as private payments and may be used to pay or secure tax-exempt bonds issued by the City or EDC. Generally, the determination of whether a •management contract is a qualified management contract is based on the interplay between the term Of the contract and the type of compensation received by the manager: a.. For a 15-year contract, at least 953 of,. the,manag:er'.s compensation must be fixed, which is defined as a stated. dollar amount .paid ;fora. specified period of time-. The stated dollar amount may be; increased periodically by reference to an external objective standard, e.g. the Consumer Price Index. b. For a 10-year contract, at least 80% of the compensation must be fixed. c. For a 5-year contract, at least 50% of the compensation must be. fixed, and the City must have the right to cancel the contract without penalty or cause at the end of 3 years. The balance of the compensation may be based- on a pear-unit fee or e. percentage of gross revenues or expenses but .not both, and' may not result in sharing a.percentage of the net profits with the Developer.. • I recall hearing the Developer say during our conference call that he was looking for a 20-year management contract. If so, that would not be a qualified management contract and would result in private. business use of the entire complex by -the Developer, making any revenues received by the City or the EDC from the project private payments. In that case the City could issue taxable bonds to which these revenues would be pledged and could "also issue tax-exempt bonds or COs payable from ad valorem taxes to finance infrastructure or other project costs. This' was essentially the. structure used by League City to finance .the Big League Dreams project. I know this is a lot to digest, so if any of you have questions after reviewing the foregoing, please feel free to :email or call: me at the number below. I look forward to working with you on this proje"ct.. Gregg H. Jones Andrews Kurth LLP 713-220-4479 7.13-238-7133 (fax) This email message and any attachments are for. the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain confidential and/or .privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments. Treasury Circular 230 Disclosure - To comply with requirements iniposed- by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that..any tax advice: contained. in this written :communication" (including any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the person. If this written communication contains any tax advice that is used or referred to in connection. with the promoting, marketing or recommending of any transaction(s) or matter(s), this written communication should be construed..as written to support the .promoting, marketing or recommending of the transaction.(s) or matter(S) addressed by this written communication, and the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an- independent tax advisor. No limitation has been imposed by Andrews Kurth LLP on disclosure of the tax treatment or tax structure of the transaction(S) or matter.(s) • fiitachment(618595-108-13-200911-03.1 G AM).PDF •