R2002-0075 05-13-02 RESOLUTION NO. R2002-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND,
TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LONGWOOD
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS:
Section 1. That certain contract by and between the City of Pearland and Klotz
Associates, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all
purposes, is hereby authorized and approved.
Section 2. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute
and the City Secretary to attest a contract with Klotz Associates, Inc., for engineering
services associated with the Longwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 13 dayof May ,
A.D., 2002. ~--'~)~/J///b Jr~'~¢~
TOM REID
MAYOR
ATTEST:
SE.(~RETARY g/ ~
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DARRIN M. COKER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF PEARLAND
STANDARD AGREEMENT
FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
Exhibit "A"
R2002-75
This Contract (Contract) is made between the City of Pearland, Texas
(hereinafter "City"), and Klot~. Associates, Inc. (hereinafter "Engineer") as follows:
1. Summary of Contract Terms. The following information and referenced documents
shall be a part of this Contract:
Description of Project: Archeological Investigation of Site Proposed for
Longwood Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
EngineedSubconsultant(s) Fee Basis of Compensation
See Exhibit A $44,700.00 Salary cost times
multiplier plus non-salar,~
Maximum Contract Amount expenses
* All financial obligations created by this agreement are between the City and
Engineer, and shall not be construed to be between City and any subconsultant.
Delivery of plans, specifications and estimates: See Exhibit B /.f~/~ ~
Attachments: Scope of Services - Exhibit A
Project Schedule - Exhibit B
2. Services and Payment.
Engineer shall perform services within
profession as follows:
W?l oz.
__ ~"~_._-'_" - 0 ,'1/'"1~-
..
the Standard of Care of the Engineering
A. Engineer will furnish services to the City in accordance with the terms and
conditions specified in this Contract. Payment for the services of Engineer shall be due
and payable upon submission and approval of a statement for services to City.
Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly.
After consultation with the City, the Engineer shall specify the basis of
compensation in the scope of work for the project. The Engineer shall provide adequate
detail of the basis of compensation so that the City can determine the reasonableness
of the fees and have the ability to make reasonable progress payments to the Engineer
based upon work completed at the payment intervals. The Engineer shall subcontract
for all subconsultants, subject to City approval, necessary to complete the scope of
work. The subconsultant's fees and administrative mark-up, if any, shall be included in
the scope of work. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the method of compensation shall
be one of the following methods:
1. Salary Cost Times Multiplier Plus Direct Nonsalary Expense ("Salary")
Compensation shall be based on 1) the direct salaries (including benefits)
of the Engineer's employees whose time is directly chargeable to the
project; 2) an agreed upon multiplier to compensate the Engineer for
overhead and profit; and 3) reimbursement for direct nonsalary
expenditures and subconsultant contracts as defined in the scope of work
for the project. The Engineer shall provide a proposal that includes the
total fees for the project, which shall not be exceeded without prior City
approval.
2. Per Diem ("Per Diem")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) an agreed upon lump sum per day
for specific services; and 2) reimbursement for direct nonsalary
expenditures and subconsultant contracts as defined in the scope of work
for the project. This method is best suited to expert witness work or other
short-term engagements involving intermittent services.
3. Cost Plus Fixed Fee ("Cost Plus")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) reimbursement of the actual costs
of all services and supplies related to the project and 2) an agreed upon
fixed fee (profit). The Engineer shall provide an estimate of the costs to
be reimbursed, but actual compensation shall be based upon invoices and
supporting documentation provided by the Engineer.
4. Lump Sum ("Lump")
Compensation shall be based upon an agreed lump sum payment for
completing the entire scope of work. This method is best suited to
investigations or studies and for basic services with limited scope and
complexity.
5. Percent of Construction ("Percent")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) the "Harris County Curve for
Engineering Compensation" for basic and construction phase services;
and 2) reimbursement for direct nonsalary expenditures and subconsultant
contracts as defined in the scope of work for the project. The Engineer
shall provide a proposal that includes the estimated construction cost of
the project and the total fees for the project. If the actual Iow bid for
construction is 20% above or below the estimate, the engineering fees are
subject to equitable adjustment by mutual agreement of the Engineer and
City.
If City fails to make any payment due Engineer for services and expenses within
thirty (30) days after receipt and approval of Engineer's statement for services therefore,
the amounts due Engineer will be increased at the rate of one percent (1%) per month
from said thirtieth (30th) day, and, in addition, Engineer may, after giving seven (7) days'
written notice to City, suspend services under this Contract until Engineer has been paid
in full, all amounts due for services, expenses, and charges.
B. All the Engineer's working drawings, plans, and specifications, if required under
this Contract, shall be sufficiently accurate, detailed, and complete so that competitive
bids for the work can be obtained and the improvements constructed.
C. Approval of the Engineer's work by the City shall not release the Engineer, its
employees, agents, or consultants, from the responsibility and liability for the accuracy
and competency of their designs, working drawings, and specifications, or other
documents and services.
D. Subject to Article 8 herein or as otherwise agreed, the Engineer shall promptly
correct errors in the Engineer's work, including errors discovered after final payment,
without receiving additional compensation.
E. Prior to execution of this agreement, the Engineer shall prepare a project
schedule identified as an attachment to this agreement and submit it for review within
15 calendar days after receiving a Notice-to-Proceed The Project Schedule shall be
submitted in digital and paper form, in the Microsoft Project for Windows format. The
Project Schedule shall contain a complete schedule so that the Engineer's scope of
services under this contract can be accomplished within the specified time and contract
cost. The Project Schedule will provide specific work sequence and definite review
times by the City and the Engineer of the work performed. If the review time should
take longer than shown on the project schedule, through no fault of the Engineer,
additional contract time may be authorized by the City through a supplemental
agreement, if requested by a timely written request from the En_gineer and approved by
3. Term and Termination. This Contract term will begin upon execution and en~
The City may terminate this Contract at any time during its term by giving written notice
to Engineer. The City shall pay the Engineer for all services rendered to the date of
termination.
4. Modifications. City without invalidating the Contract, may order changes within the
general scope of the work required by the Contract by altering, adding to and/or
deducting from the work to be performed. If any change under this clause causes an
increase or decrease in Engineer's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of
any part of the Services under the Contract, an equitable adjustment will be made by
mutual agreement and the Contract modified in writing accordingly.
5. Subcontracts. If, for any reason, at any time during the progress of providing
services, City determines that any subcontractor for Engineer is incompetent or
undesirable, City will notify Engineer accordingly and Engineer shall take immediate
corrective action, which may include cancellation of such subcontract. Subletting by
subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in the
Contract shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and City.
6. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, report data, and other project information
developed in the execution of the services provided under this Contract shall be the
property of the City upon payment of Engineer's fees for services. Engineer may retain
copies for record purposes. Owner agrees such documents are not intended or
represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others. Any reuse by City or by those
who obtained said documents from City without written verification or adaptation by
Engineer will be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engineer, or
to Engineer's independent associates or consultants, and City shall indemnify and hold
harmless Engineer and Engineer's independent associates and consultants from all
claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or
resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle Engineer to further
reasonable compensation. Engineer may reuse all drawings, report data, and other
project information in the execution 'of the services provided under this Contract in
Engineer's other activities. Any reuse by Engineer will be at Engineer's sole risk and
without liability or legal exposure to City, and Engineer shall indemnify and hold
harmless City from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees
arising out of or resulting therefrom.
7. Insurance.
A. The Engineer shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons, damages to property, or any errors and
omissions relating to the performance of any work by the Engineer, its agents,
employees or subcontractors under this Agreement, as follows:
(1) Workers' Compensation as required by law.
(2) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 in
the aggregate.
(3)
Comprehensive General Liability and Property Damage Insurance with
minimum limits of $1,000,000 for injury or death of any one person,
$1,000,000 for each occurrence, and $1,000,000 for each occurrence of
damage to or destruction of property.
(4) Comprehensive Automobile and Truck Liability Insurance covering owned,
hired, and non-owned vehicles, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 for
injury or death of any one person, $1,000,000 for each occurrence, and
$1,000,000 for property damage.
B. The Engineer shall include the City as an additional insured under the policies,
with the exception of the Professional Liability Insurance and Workers' Compensation.
Certificates of Insurance and endorsements shall be furnished to the City before work
commences. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to
the City. Upon request, certified copies of all insurance policies shall be furnished to the
City.
8. Indemnity. Engineer shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents, and
employees, harmless from any claim, loss, damage, suit, and liability of every kind for
which Engineer is legally liable, including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and
attorney's feeS, for injury to or death of any person, for damage to any property, or
errors in design, any of which are caused by the negligent act or omission of the
Engineer, his officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors under this Contract.
9. Assignment. Engineer shall not assign this Contract without the prior written
consent of the City.
10. Law Governinq and Venue. This Contract shall be governed by the law of the State
of Texas and no lawsuit shall be prosecuted on this Contract except in a court of
competent jurisdiction located in Brazoria County, Texas.
11. Entire Contract. This Contract represents the entire Contract between the City and
the Engineer and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or contracts, either
written or oral. This Contract may be amended only by written instrument signed by
both parties. Purchase orders issued under this Agreement shall contain a statement
nullifying additional terms and conditions on the reverse side of the purchase order and
referencing this Agreement.
12. Conflicts in Contract Documents. The above provisions shall govern over any
conflicting provision contained in any referenced contract document specified above.
13. Dispute Resolution Procedures. The Engineer and City desire an expeditious
means to resolve any disputes that may arise between them regarding this Contract. To
accomplish this, the parties agree to mediation as follows: If a dispute arises out of or
relates to this Contract, or the breach thereof, and if the dispute cannot be settled
through negotiation, then the parties agree first to try in good faith, and before bringing
any legal action, to settle the dispute by mediation of a third party who will be selected
by agreement of the parties.
EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the 13 day of May
,20 02
CITY OF PEARLAND
Klotz Associates, Inc.
, Engineer
B il
City Manager
By:
NamE' Billy M. Cooke, P.E.
Printed
Title: Executive Vice PreSident
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY O F"~/'~
.~ BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
~'/? ~-~'~,~,~..-~,- , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes
and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER
~l~[',~L~l 'Notary Publl~, 8~e of T~
~ J~ My Commlealon Expires: .
STATE OF TE~S
COUN~ OF
MY HAND
,A.D., 20¢
AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS //~" DAY
OTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF TEXAS
Printed Name: ~,'''z/~/~/~(/"~'~"
My Commission Expires:/¢/¢~-// .~/ ~20~-~~
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
Billy M. Cooke, P.E. , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS 23rd DAY OF
May , A.D., 2002
. O I/~A )R(Y P~U B L, ~4R~ THE
STATE OF TEXAS
Printed Name:
Diana Mitchell
~ [ ~'".._~L._"~' .~ Notary PtJbllc '
~[*( ~]*J State of Texas
6
Diana Mitchell
KLOTZ
ASSOCIATES
INC.
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
April 10, 2002
1160 Dairy Ashford
Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77079
(281) 589-7257
(281) 589-7309 Fax
email@klotz.com
Mr. Jerry Bums
Director of Public Works
City of Pearland
3501 E. Orange Street
Pearland, Texas 77581
Rel
Archeological Investigation of Site Proposed for
Longwood Wastewater Treatment Expansion
TPDES Permit Application (TNRCC Draft Permit No. 10134-10)
Klotz Associates Project No. 21810
Dear Mr. Bums:
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for providing follow-up engineering
services for the referenced project.
UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT
Klotz Associates prepared a Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit
application for the Longwood Wastewater Treatment Plant and submitted it to the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission on August 1,2001. Klotz Associates, Inc.
received a draft TPDES Permit for the Longwood facility on January 24, 2002, and
forwarded the City's comments and ours to the TNRCC on February 13, 2002. In a letter
dated March 5, 2002, the TNRCC notified Klotz Associates that the draft TPDES permit had
been revised as requested and forwarded it to the office of the Chief Clerk for further
processing.
The draft permit provides for expansion of the Longwood plant on a 10.8013 acre tract of
land owned by the City that is adjacent to the existing plant. The City envisions the total
capacity of the new plant modules to be 4.0 mgd with the first module having a capacity of
2.0 mgd.
On January 10, 2002 the Texas Historical Commission (THC) sent a copy of a letter dated
January 8, 2002 and addressed to the TNRCC Wastewater Permits Section stating that the
10.8013 acre tract proposed for plant expansion contains archeological site 41 HR 194. In
that letter, the THC recommends that the proposed plant site be relocated. If that is not
possible, the THC requests that longitudinal trenches be excavated with heavy equipment so
that a professional archeologist can inspect the site. The THC also requires that a written
KLOTZ
ASSOCIATES,
INC.
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
Mr. Jerry Bums
April 10, 2002
Page 2
report of the findings be provided for their review and for the THC to determine if further
work is necessary.
In a letter dated March 20, 2002, Mr. Robert D. Brush of the TNRCC's Environmental Law
Division notified the City and Klotz Associates that City should reach a resolution of the
THC's objection directly through Mr. Ed Baker of the THC. According to the TNRCC, the
draft TPDES permit will remain a draft permit until the THC removes its objection regarding
use of the 10.8013 acre parcel for plant expansion.
The objectives of the proposed scope of services are:
· To provide the required investigation report to the THC as the first step in determining if
the 10.8013 acre tract can be used for expansion of the Longwood WWTP without
further investigations;
· To determine if the THC will require any additional investigation work; and
To estimate the cost of any investigation needed to prepare the site for development by
the City.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
Klotz Associates will provide the following services to meet the project objectives described
above:
· Confirm specific TNRCC and THC archeological site investigation requirements.
· Obtain and review proposal from the archeological investigation subcontractor (Prewitt
and Associates, Inc.), finalize scope of work and approach.
· Obtain and review proposal from surveying subcontractor (C.L. Davis & Company),
finalize scope of work and approach.
· Coordinate site investigation with subcontractors and City staff.
· Visit site during investigations to determine possible impacts on layout of proposed
Longwood WWTP expansion.
· Prepare site plan showing archeological features and proposed plant structures. Upon
approval by City, provide site plan to Prewitt and Associates, Inc. for incorporation into
archeological site investigation report.
· Coordinate review of Prewitt and Associates, Inc. report by Klotz Associates and the
City, and preparation of final report by Prewitt and Associates, Inc.
· Monitor progress of report review by THC.
· In cooperation with Prewitt and Associates, Inc., answer questions and provide additional
information as required by the THC and TNRCC.
KLQTZ
ASSOCIATES,
INC.
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
Mr. Jerry Bums
April 10, 2002
Page 3
Provide revised permit application exhibits to TNRCC if THC removes objection to
development of the 10.8013 acre tract.
We request that the City of Pearland do the following:
Sign archeological permit application and pay any required permit application fee.
Provide backhoe and operator for the duration of the sitework (up to four days).
Provide escorted access onto the site for Klotz Associates, Prewitt and Associates,
Inc., and C.L. Davis & Company.
TERMS AND FEE
We propose to perform the required basic engineering services on a "salary cost times
multiplier plus direct nonsalary expenses" under the terms of the City's Standard Agreement
for Engineering Services. A marked up copy of the Standard Agreement is attached for use
by the City in preparing the final Standard Agreement. This letter will serve as Exhibit A to
that agreement.
Our salary cost multiplier is 2.5.
We propose to provide the services described herein for the fee presented below and detailed
in Attachment A. A copy of the Prewitt & Associates, Inc. and C.L. Davis & Company
professional services proposals are enclosed as Attachments B and C.
Firm Primary
Responsibilities Fee
Klotz Associates, Inc. Project Coordination, Site $16,900.00
Plan Development, TNRCC
& THC Communications,
TPDES Permit Revisions
Prewitt & Associates, Inc. Archeological Investigation $21,300.00
C.L. Davis & Company Surveying $6,500.00
Total $40,700.00
KLQTZ
ASSOCIATES,
INC.
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
Mr. Jerry Burns
April 10, 2002
Page 4
SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule for the project is provided as Exhibit B to the City's Standard
Agreement.
PROJECT STAFF
Mr. Fred Mittl, P.E. will serve as Project Manager for this Project and the undersigned will
serve as Principal-in-Charge.
Thank you for this opportunity to serve the City of Pearland. Please call if you have any
questions.
Very truly yours,
Larry F. Smalley, P.E.
Manager, Public Utilities Division
LFS:ng
Attachment A - Project Budget Detail
Attachment B - Prewitt & Associates, Inc. Professional Services Proposal
Attachment C - C.L. Davis & Company Professional Services Proposal
Mr. Alan R. Mueller, Deputy City Manager
Mr. John W. Hargrove, P.E., City Engineer
Attachment A
Project Budget Details
Attachment A
City of Pearland
Longwood Wastewater Treatment Plant TPDES Permit
Archeological Investigation of Site Proposed for Longwood WWTP Expansion
Project Budget Detail
April 3, 2002
Senior
Subtask Descriptions Principal Project Project Design Total
Engineer Engineer Designer Clerical
Manager Hours
Project Management (6 month duration) 8 3 11
Obtain and Review Prewitt & Associates Proposal 3 3
Obtain and Review C.L. Davis Proposal 3 3
Coordinate Site Investigation with Subcontractors
& City Staff 6 2 8
Site Visits During Archeological Investigation 8 14 22
Prepare Site Plan Showing Archeological Features
and Proposed Plant Structures, Address City
Comments & Provide to Prewitt & Associates 2 10 4 18 34
Coordinate Review of Report by City, Klotz
Report Review 1 7 1 9
Monitor Progress of Report Review by THC 4 4
With Prewitt & Associates, Prepare Response to
Texas Historical CommissionFl'NRCC 2 8 4 4 2 20
TNRCC Coordination for Final TPDES Permit
(Revise Exhibits) 1 8 6 12 27
Task Totals 6 65 0 28 34 8 141
Budget
PERSONNEL Hours
?rincipal 6
genior Project Manager 65
Project Engineer 0
Design Engineer 28
Senior Designer 34
Clerical 8
Klotz Associates, Inc. Labor Cost 141
Klotz Associates, Inc. Expenses
Total Klotz Associates, Inc.
Total Prewitt and Associates, Inc.
Total C.L. Davis & Company
Total
Hourly
Rate Cost
$150 $900
$140 $9,100
$95 $0
$85 $2,380
$95 $3,230
$60 $480
$16,090
$810
$16,900
$21,300
$6,500
$44,700
Page 1 of 1
Attachment B
Prewitt & Associates, Inc. ProfessiOnal Services Proposal
PREWI & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CULTURAL RESOURCES SERVICES
Since 1979
7701 N. ~R, SUITE 104
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78752-1012
FAX (512) 459-3851
(512) 459-3349
staff~paiarch, com
January29,2002
Fred Mittl, PE
Klotz Associates, Inc.
l 160 Dairy Ashford, Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77046
Re:
Archeological Testing of 41 HR84 (Rogers Site)
for proposed Longwood Wastewater Plant,
City of Pearland, Texas
Dear Mr. Mittl:
As we discussed by phone this morning, this letter constitutes our proposal to conduct
archeological investigations at 41HR84 in connection with the City of Pearland's (CITY)
proposed Longwood wastewater treatment plant. A fee proposal showing the costs to conduct the
archeological investigations is enclosed. AcCording to Ed Baker at the Texas Historical
Commission (THC), the project falls under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
because the plant will need a discharge permit, and the Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination
System program is administered by the Texas National Resources Conservation Commission on
behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The proposed plant location falls within a
portion of prehistoric archeological site 41HR84 (called the Rogers site) and may impact
significant buried cultural deposits. Archeological testing will be needed to determine whether or
not the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
Our fee proposal to conduct backhoe trenching and hand excavation to determine NRHP
eligibility as required by the THC is $18,502.58. We know that at least one and possibly two
mound areas (these are natural landforms) containing buried prehistoric archeological remains are
located in the proposed treatment plant construction zone. Our field investigations will address
the primary question of whether the archeological remains are significant or not. If any areas are
found to be significant (i.e., they further archeological investigations if they were to be disturbed
or destroyed by the project), we will work with you to look at the possibility of altering the
project design (e.g., moving construction areas) to avoid impacts to those areas.
Before beginning the fieldwork; we will do all the paperwork needed to apply for and
obtain a Texas Antiquities Permit to conduct the investigations. The permit will be issued to us,
but a CITY representative and someone from the EPA will need to sign the permit application.
The archeological work we propose includes two archeologists spending up to four days on site.
We assume that the CITY will provide us with a backhoe and operator at no expense, and that
access to the site is not a problem. We also assume that the CITY will coordinate with all
appropriate entities to confirm that there are no buried utility lines or other hazards in the areas
where we will need to dig.
Mittl Letter, Page 2
The archeological investigations will involve excavation of two or more trenches in each
mound area that might be impacted by the project, and excavation of several backhoe trenches in
the areas between mounds to confirm that there are no buried archeological remains. We also will
hand dig 50xS0-cm or 100xl00-cm test units adjacent to selected trenches as needed to sample
the cultural deposits. We will conduct the appropriate artifact and archeoiogical data analyses and
prepare and submit a draft report to the THC for their review. We will address all review
comments, prepare and submit 50 copies of the final report, and assume responsibility for making
sure all of the obligations stipulated in the antiquities permit are met.
I estimate that the total time involved in these studies could be as much as three to four
months from notice to proceed until the THC provides review comments on the draft report. We
would prefer to have at least three week's notice before starting the fieldwork. The proposed
schedule for this work is:
Obtain notice to proceed
Apply for and receive a Texas Antiquities Permit from the THC
Conduct fieldwork
Conduct artifact and data analysis and prepare draft report
Review of draft report by THC
Address review comments and prepare final report
Submit final report and clear permit
2 to 4 weeks
I week
4 to 6 weeks
4 weeks
6 weeks
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please call or email me if you
have any questions regarding the cost estimate or the proposed archeological investigations. If
anyone from the CITY needs more information, please do not hesitate to have them contact me
directly. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Douglas K. Boyd, RPA
Vice President
Enclosure
FEE PROPOSAL
PROJECT: Archeological Testing and National Register Assessment of 41HR84 (Rogers Site)
SUBMITTED TO: Klotz Associates, Inc. for the City of Pearland, Texas
SUBMITTED BY: Prewitt and Associates, Inc.
DATE SUBMITTED: January 29, 2002
TYPE OF CONTRACT: Firm, Fixed Price
Description Quantity Unit Rate Cost
I. Salaries and Wages
A. Prefield Preparation
1. Principal Investigator
2. Project Archeologist, Prehistoric
3. Project Archeologist, Historic
4. Project Geomorphologist
5. Project Historian
Subtotal:
2.5 hour $73.75 $184.38
6 hour $51.25 $307.50
hour $43.13 $0.00
hour $51.25 $0.00
hour $62.50 $0.00
8.5 $491.88
B. Field Investigations
1. Principal Investigator
2. Project Archeologist, Prehistoric
3. Project Archeologist, Historic
4. Project Geomorphologist
5. Project Historian
6. Assistant Project Archeologist
7. Archeological Assistant
Subtotal:
40
40
80
C. Laboratory Analysis and Report Preparation
1. Principal Investigator 8
2. Project Archeologist, Prehistoric 80
3. Project Archeologist, Historic
4. Project Geomorphologist
5. Project Historian
6. Assistant Project Archeologist
7. Laboratory Supervisor 20
8. Laboratory Technician 40
9. Drafter 16
10. Illustrator 24
11. Word Processor 24
12. Editor 8
Subtotal: 220
Total, Item I:
hour $73.75 $0.00
hour $51.25 $2,050.00
hour $43.13 $0.00
hour $51.25 $0.00
hour $62.50 $0.00
hour $48.75 $1,950.00
hour $33.75 $0.00
$4,00O.00
hour $73.25 $586.00
hour $51.25 $4,100.00
hour $43.13 $0.00
hour $51.25 $0.00
hour $62.50 $0.00
hour $48.75 $0.00
hour $65.00 $1,300.00
hour $35.00 $1,400.00
hour $58.13 $930.08
hour $37.50 $900.00
hour $40.63 $975.12
hour $73.25 $586.00
$10,777.20
Totals
$15,269:08
Page I of 2
Description
II. Equipment, Materials, and Supplies
A. Vehicle Rental
B. Backhoe Rental
C. Field Supplies
D. Laboratory Supplies
E. Office Supplies
Total, Item I1:
III. Travel and Per Diem
A. Subsistence and Quarters
B. Vehicle Mileage
Total, Item II1:
IV. Other Costs
A. Radiocarbon Assays
B. Faunal Analysis
C. Macrobotanical Analysis
D. Communications
E. Photocopying
F. Report Production
E. Collection Accessioning
Total, Item IV:
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS:
Quantity
5
0
4
4
12
9
540
1
10
150
5O
0.5
Unit
day
day
day
day
day
day
mile
sample
sample
sample
day
page
copy
cuft
Rate
$75.00
$600.00
$12.00
$6.00
$6.0O
$75.00
$0.40
$595.00
$25.00
$25.00
$5.00
$0.08
$12.00
$1,133.00
Cost
$375.00
$0.00
$48.00
$24.00
$72.00
$675.00
$216.00
$595.00
$0.00
$0.00
$50.00
$12.00
$600.00
$566.5O
Totals
$519.00
$891.00
$1,823.50
$18,502.58
Page 2 of 2
Attachment C
C.L. Davis & Company Professional Services Proposal
C.L. DAVIS & COMPANY
LAND SURVEYING
1500 WINDING WAY
FRIENDSWOOD, TEXAS 77546
(281) 482-9490
FAX (28t) 482-1294
E-MAIL: cldavisc@gte.net
February 6, 2002
Mr. Fred Mittl
Klotz Associates, Inc,
1160 Dairy Ashford, Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77079
Re: Longwood Treatment Plant
Dear Mr. MitU:
Our proposal for land surveying services for the above referenced project is as follows:
Specifically, our proposal covers the following item(s):
1. Locate mounds indentified by the Texas Historical Commission on the
above referenced site (horizontally only)
06.0 Hours Principal @ $125.00
24.0 Hours Field @ $110.00
24.0 Hours Total Station @ $ 30.00
20.0 HoursCadd @ $ 70.00
03.0 Hours Clerical @ $ 45.00
Total Amount of Proposal
$750100
$2,640.00
$720.00
$1,400.00
$135.00
$$,645. oo
The following items will be invoiced at cost:
Reproductions
Submittal fee(s) to governmental agencies
Delivery service
Electronic Mail
Abstracting
2002-013 Longwood Mounds.doc
Payment of all invoices is due thirty days from receipt. Fee based on hours shown
above to be sufficient to complete project. Any changes or revisions in the scope of the
project after authorization to proceed will be billed on an hourly basis as described
below:
Principal
Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS)
Technical/Cadd
Three-man field crew
Data Collection
Clerical
$125.00
$85.00
$70.00
$110.00
$30,00
$45.00
All surveying services are under the jurisdiction of the Texas Board of Land Surveying:
7701 North Lamar, Suite 400; Austin, Texas 78752; phone number: 512-452-9427. Any
complaints about surveying services should be sent to the above address to the
attention of Complaints Officer of the Board.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to working
with you.
Sincerely:,
C.L, Davis, R.P,L.S.
Approved & Accepted
Mr. Fred Mittl
Klotz Associates, Inc.
2002-013 Longwood Mounds.doc