1997-04-14 P&Z Minutes (in Agenda Packet)AGENDA -REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, APRIL 21, 1997, 6:00
P.M. IN THE SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, 3519 LIBERTY
DRIVE, PEARLAND, TEXAS.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of April 14, 1997
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -Preliminary Plat of Sedgefield,
Section 1 at Silverlake. A subdivision of 32.3244 acres of land out of the John W.
Maxey Survey, Abstract No. 721 and the G.C. Smith Survey, Abstract No. 548,
Brazoria County, Texas.
Variance Request:
1. Use of 20 foot building line setbacks on lots fronting the bulb portion of cul-
de-sacs.
2. Use of 5 foot side lot building line setbacks.
B. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -Final Plat of Oakbrook Estates,
Section Three, and a Partial Replat of Oakbrook Estates, Section One. A subdivision
of 5.9329 acres out of the W.D.C. Hall League, Abstract No. 70, Pearland, Brazoria
County, Texas.
C. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -Final Replat of Lot 1, Block 4,
Green Tee Terrace, Section 1, Vol. 170, Pg. 28, H.C.M.R.. Being a 0.2916 acre tract
located in the W.D.C. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 23 , in Harris County, Texas
D. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -Discussion item to review the
update of Land Use Assumptions, Water and Sewer Capital Projects and Impact Fees.
E. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -Discussion item to review
Subdivision Ordinance proposed changes.
IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: Monday, April 28, 1997, 6:00 p.m. Joint Public Hearing
V. ADJOURNMENT
Posted: ,L f?zlu Day of __ ~-1-1------------' A.D., 1997
/~P.M.
Removed: ______ Day of _______________ , A.D., 1997
' I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, HELD MONDAY, APRIL 14,
1997, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING IN THE SECOND
FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, 3519 LIBERTY DRIVE, PEARLAND,
TEXAS.
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:45 p.m. with the following present:
Vice Chairman Pat Lopez
Commissioner Emil Beltz
Commissioner Jack D. Mathis
Commissioner Randy Patro
Commissioner Mary Starr
Assistant City Manager Richard Burdine
City Engineer John Hargrove
City Projects Coordinator Alan Mueller
Secretary Judy Highburger
Commissioner Marshall Eggers was absent.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of April 7, 1997
A motion was made by Commissioner Emil Beltz, and seconded by Commissioner Mary Starr to
approve the Minutes of April 7, 1997.
Motion passed 4 to 1 (Commissioner Jack D. Mathis abstained).
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 112
Request of Josephine Leggio, owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and Urban
Development Ordinance of said City from Classification Suburban Development
District (SD) to General Business District (GB) on the following described
property, to-wit:
1
Lot 18, Section 3, Garden Acres, approximately .6 acres out of Tract 36, H.T. &
B. R.R. Survey, Section 7, A-219, recorded in volume 10, page 77 of the plat
records of Brazoria County, Texas.
Assistant City Manager Richard Burdine, presented the Commissioners with copies of the Final
Judgement of Seminole Pipeline Company (Plaintiff) vs. Mike F. Leggio (Defendant), et al. This
document was discussed previously in the first half of the meeting. He went on to say that the
document contains an excellent description of the pipel."1e easement.
Discussion began with concerns of the property meeting the width requirements, to which Mr.
Burdine referenced the Land Use and Urban Development Ordinance Section 24.2, allowing
flexibility for lot platted prior to the effective date of the zoning ordinance -which is the date a
property was annexed in this case.
Mr. Burdine said the Judgement provides the property owner limited use of the surface of the
pipeline easement with the pipeline company having underground uses. Developers must go to
the pipeline company and work out details of paving over or crossing the easement. Mr. Burdine
emphasized that the issue at hand is whether or not "GB" zoning is appropriate, not the pipeline
easement.
Commissioner Mathis stated the letter of the law states structures can be built on the 30' easement,
it can be traveled across, or parked on (may require expansion joints). Vice Chairman Lopez said
the development of the site stands alone. Mr. Burdine said he reviewed the Judgement with the
City Attorney prior to the meeting and is conveying her opinion.
Commissioner Randy Patro made a motion to deny Application 112. Motion failed for lack of
a second. There was no further discussion.
Commissioner Beltz made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Starr to approve Application 112
as presented.
Motion passed to approve 4 to 1 (Commissioner Patro abstained).
B. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 114
Request of Leo J. Gabriel III, owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and
Urban Development Ordinance of said City from Classification Suburban
Development District (SD) to General Business District (GB) on the following
described property, to-wit:
Lot 2, Block 1, Gabriel Enterprises Subdivision, approximately .5165 acres,
recorded in Volume 19, pages 291-292 of the deed records of Brazoria County,
Texas.
There was no representative present.
Commissioner Beltz made a motion seconded by Commissioner Patro to approve Application No.
114.
2
Motion passed to approve 5 to 0.
C. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 116
Request of George H. McCaa, owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and
Urban Development Ordinance of said City from Classification Suburban
Development District (SD) to General Business District (GB) on the following
described property, to-wit:
2.00 acres out of Lot 23, Allison-Richey Gulf Coast Home Co. Suburban Gardens
Subdivision, Section 8, H.T. & 8. R.R., A-504, recorded in Vol. 2, Page 23 of
the Plat Records of Brazoria County, Texas.
There was no representative present.
Commissioner Patro made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Mathis to approve Application
No. 116.
Motion passed to approve 5 to 0.
D. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 113
Request of Josephine M. Leggio, owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and
Urban Development Ordinance of said City from Classification Suburban
Development District (SD) to Commercial District (C) on the following described
property, to-wit:
Lots A and B, Section 3, Garden Acres, 2.617 acres out of Tract 36, H.T. & B.
R.R. Survey, Section 7, A-219, recorded in volume 10, page 77 of the plat records
of Brazoria County, Texas. (5800 Broadway)
Mr. Burdine said he recommends GB rather than C zoning, and Commissioner Beltz questioned
the Commercial request instead of General Business. Mr. Burdine said it was for a retail/shopping
strip.
I
Commissioner Patro made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Beltz to deny Application 113.
Motion passed to deny 5 to 0.
E. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 115
Request of Jo Maples, agent for Bill E. Holley, owner, for an amendment to the
Land Use and Urban Development Ordinance of said City from Classification
Suburban Development District (SD) to Commercial District (C) on the following
described property, to-wit:
Lot 23, Allison-Richey Gulf Coast Home Co. Suburban Gardens Subdivision of
Section 8, H.T. & 8. R.R. Survey, A-504, recorded in Volume 2, Page 23 of the
plat records of Brazoria County, Texas. (5523 Broadway)
3
There was no representative present.
The Corrunissioners questioned the proposed uses of the land listed on the Zone Change
Application which includes apartments, strip center with bar, cleaners, radiator shop, and storage
for apartments.
Corrunissioner Beltz made a motion to approve Application No. 115 and exclude some of the
proposed uses. Mr. Burdine said some of the uses would remain non-conforming.
Corrunissioner Beltz revised his motion to approve as presented, and Commissioner Starr seconded
the motion.
Another concern was if a radiator shop would be a Specific Use, to which Vice Chairman Lopez
replied it would still be non-conforming. Mr. Burdine said the best use of the property would be
a shopping center, and most of the other uses would fall into the GB category.
Motion passed to approve 4 to 1 (Commissioner Patro abstained).
F. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 207
Request of Pro-Line Water Screen Services, Inc., agent for Gatech Enterprises, Inc.,
owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and Urban Development Ordinance of
said City from Classification Suburban Development District (SD) to Heavy
Industrial District (M2) on the following described property, to-wit:
2.00 acres out of Lot 178, Zychlinsk:i Subdivision, Section 28, H.T. & 8. R.R.
Survey, A-551, (G.C. Smith Survey), recorded Vol. 593, Page 407 of the Deed
Records of Brazoria County, Texas. (17605 SH 35)
There was no representative present.
G. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION-APPLICATION NO. 208
Request of Gatech Enterprises, Inc., owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and
Urban Development Ordinance of said City from Classification Suburban
Development District (SD) to Heavy Industrial District (M2) on the following
described property, to-wit:
2.7106 acres out of Lot 178, Zychlinski Subdivision, Section 28, H.T. & 8. R.R.
Survey, A-551, (G.C. Smith Survey), recorded Vol. 29, Page 9 of the Deed
Records of Brazoria County, Texas. (17635 SH 35)
A motion was made by Commissioner Beltz, and seconded by Corrunissioner Starr to join
Applications No. 207-208.
Motion passed to join 5 to 0.
Corrunissioner Starr made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Beltz to approve Applications No.
207-208.
4
Commissioner Patro asked if there was another category instead of M 1 or M2 for these two
requests, and Mr. Burdine said he anticipates the area remaining industrial. Commissioner Patro
questioned Dixie Farm being developed as residential. Mr. Burdine explained it was a
thoroughfare.
Motion passed to approve 5 to 0.
H. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -SPECIFIC USE PERMIT
APPLICATION NO. 53
Request of Pro-Line Water Screen Services, Inc., agent for Gatech Enterprises, Inc.
owner, for a Specific Use Permit on the following described property, to-wit:
2.00 acres out of Lot 178, Zychlinski Subdivision, Section 28, H.T. & B. R. R.
Survey, A-551, (G.C. Smith Survey), recorded in Vol. 593, Page 407 of the Deed
Records of Brazoria County, Texas. (17605 SH 35)
There was no representative present.
Commissioner Starr made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Mathis, to approve Specific Use
Permit Application No. 53.
Motion passed to approve 5 to 0.
I. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION -APPLICATION NO. 198
Request of Bert Jones, owner, for an amendment to the Land Use and Urban
Development Ordinance of said City from Classification Single Family Dwelling
District (R-2) to General Business (GB) on the following described property, to-
wit:
South Yi of Lot 45, approximately 5 acres, Allison-Richey Subdivision of the H.T.
& B. R. R. Survey, Section 6, A-544.
Mr. Bert Jones, owner, was present and seeking approval of Application No. 198.
Discussion revolved around the surrounding area's zoning, which was shown by Mr. Burdine on
a wall map. There is commercial zoning along Broadway, the Knights of Columbus Hall is zoned
GB, and all around that area is zoned R-2.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beltz, and seconded by Commissioner Patro to deny
Application No. 198 .
Motion to deny 5 to 0.
IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: April 21, 1997, 6:00 p.m.
5
. .
V. ADJOURNED:
Minutes approved as submitted this
A.D., 1997.
ATTEST:
8:38 p.m.
2-/ day of __._A~~_,'J.=2-~t --'C;;.__ ___ _
p~~
Ju~r,&~
6
. ---
DEED
VOL 17181·M;1616
2203 8 NO. 10,503
SEMil\OLE PIPELINE COMP ,\l\Y,
PLAINTIFF
VS.
Mil\E r. LEGGIO, SR., ET J\L,
DEFENDANTS
I
l
l
l
l
l
l
Fl NI\ L J UlJG~IENT
lN TllE COUNTY COURT
/\T L/\\\' NUt-1HER ONE
BR/\ZOHIA CCJllNTY, TEXA S
BE IT RDIEMBERED thu.t on the date hereinafter se t forth c.1111c
on to be heard and considered the above entitJed and nurnberecJ
condemnation cause h'herein· SHIINOLE PIPELINE COMPANY , a Delaware
·corporation duly a1,1thorizecJ to transa ct business in the State of
.Texas, is Plaintiff, and t-111\E r. LEGGIO, SIL , CULLEN L/\NDJS,
Executor of the Estate of D. C. Anderson, Deceased , BUDDY CREGORY,
·Executor of the Estate of lJ. C. Anderson, Deceased , LIND/\ LOU
' ANDERSON, IWNALD CLEON ANDERSON, LJNlJA C/\HROL PLATZ, L/\RHY lJOt~
ANDERSON and CllJ\RLOTTE l\/\Y !\OGER, is DefencJant, wh\ther one or
more.
\\'hereupon ln open Court Plaintiff and said Defendant, by and
through their attorneys of record, announced to the Court th;-it (l
compromise anJ scttlc111c11t of this cause h ;-i s b e en rellchcd n11c.J the
parties stipulate and agree as follOh'S, and ppon due consideration
. the Court finds and determines the following:
(I) That Defendant admits that Plaintiff is, among other
things, a corporation anJ a common carrier pipeljne company for
hire engage<l in the pipeline business trJnsporting oil products,
gas, liquified minerals and other mineral solutions in the State
of Texas anJ is Jul» ve~tcd "'ith the right and power of eminent
·domain;
(2) That DcfenJant aJmits that this Court has jurisdiction
to adjudicate this cause;
(3) That Plaintiff is condemning and acqu1r1ng herein an
e a s e m e n t a n d r i g h t -o f -,,. a y a n d a t e mp o r a r )' c o 11 s t r u c t i o n e a s e rn c n t
011 , in, oYer, unJcr, through ;inJ acro5s the hereinnfter de s cribe d
.,, .. . d
·DEED
vot 17181'~G~ 617
property oh·11ed by Dcfend<.111t for the purpose of establi s hi11g, laying,.
constructing, maintaining, inspecting, protecting, operating, repairing,
altering, cathotlically protecting, changing the sjz.e of, substituting,
replacing and removing thereon a pipeline for the tr;insportation of
oi 1 products, gas, liquj fied minerals, and other minera_l solutions;
( 4 ) Th a t a f t e r g o o d Lii t h 11 e g o t L.1 t i o n s , 11 l a i n t i ( f ".a s u n a b l e
to reach an agrcc111e11t h'ith lkfcnd:rnt 01i tile 111 ;1r"-ct value of the
easement and rigl1t-of-way and temporary construction easement to be
acquired herein and the amount of damages, if any, to Defendant's
remaining land not condemned herein, "'hereupon Plaintiff thereafter
duly and regularly filed its Statement and Petition in Condemnation
with the Judge of this Court;
( S ) Th a t upon c o 11 s i tk r at i on o f P l :1i n t i f [ ' s S t a t e 111 e n t a 11 cJ Pe t i t i o n
in Condemnation, the Judge of this Court thereafter July appointed
three disinterested freeholders of Brazori:i County, Texas, a s Special
'Commissioners, and each of said appointees duly qualified as a Special
Commissioner by taking the oJth prescribed by law;
(6) That the Special Commissioners set a time and place __ [or
hear in g P 1 n i n t i ff and De fend n n t and j s sued a \ff i t t en no t i c e o f 5 u c h
hearing, containing a copy of Plaintiff's State111cnt and Petition in
Condemnation, to Defendant, h·IJich SCJid notice \vas duly anJ ti111cly
served on all Defendant s by having been duly Jelivered and served in
person by a person comp~tent to testify;
(7) That such hearing was duly held at the time and place so
d e s i g n a t e d i n s a i d \ff i t t c n n o t i c e o f he a r i n g , a 11 J P 1 a i 11 t i f f ;:i p p e u r e d
I
by and through its attorneys of record, and the Special Commissioner5
heard the evidence offered by the Plaintiff and duly rendered their
,,. r i t t e n A h"<H d i n t h e a mo u 11 t s t a t e d t h c r e i n , a n d t h c s a 111 e , t o g e t h e r
1vi th a 11 o t h e r p a p e r s i 11 t h i s p r o c e e d i n g we r e f o r t h w i t h f i 1 e d ". i t h
the Judge of this Court;
( 8 ) Th a t o b j e c t i on s t o s a i d Ah' a rd ". e r e d u 1 y and t i me 1 y f i 1 e J
herein by DcfenJunt;
( 9 ) Th a t a 11 p r e r c q u i s i t e s h CJ v e h e e n c o 111 p l i e d ". i t h a n d a 1 1
pr c 1 i 111 i n ~ r y 5 t e p s h :1\' c b cc 11 L1 kc n t o co 11 f e r .i u r i s d i c t i o 11 or: t h i ::
- 2 -
"J, . ' . ..;
UEED
voL 17181'Mi~ 618
Court, whether or not specifically li sted h ereinabove , anJ this
cause is regularly in anJ before this Court for disposition;
(10) Th::n the herei naft er described property is subject to
condemnation and Plaintiff is entitled to have the s<J111c conJc:111nc<l as
praye<l for in Plaintiff's Statement and Petition in Col)dcmnation ,
and all of the same is admitt ed by. Defendant;
(11) That Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed upon a s um of
money and Plaintiff has paid the same to Defendnnt and De fend ant
acknowledges receipt of the said sum of money in full payment of the
following: (1) the mark et v<Jlue of the hereinafter described easement
and right-of-Kay and temporary construction easement , and also (2)
in full payment for any and all reduction or dimuniti on in market
value of the Defendant's remaining o r re111ainder lanJ ca usc<l by the
acquisition by Plaintiff of the easement a nd right-of-way a n d temporary
construction easement hereina fter <lescribed for the purposes set
forth herein, ·and further in full payment for any and all damages
inside or outside of the boundaries of said c<lse111ent and right -o f-
way and t em po r a r y cons t r u ct ion ea s cm en t t_o t he s u r face , c r ops....,
trees·, t i 111 be r , r o a <ls , 1 a k e s , po 11 <l s , gr as s 1 an <l , livestock or an\' ' ,
other property or i111prove111 e11t s , re al or person ;d , of Defend'-!nt ,
located insi<le or out:ide of the boundaries of said casement and
r i g ht -o f -"'a y and t em po r a r y c on s t r u c t i on e a s e 111 en t , w h i c h d am a g e s \,' e r e
or might have been caused by the initial establishing, laying and
con s t r u c t i n g o f s a i d p i p e 1 i n e on s a i J e a s em en t a 11 <l r i g h t -o f -\,·a y .
That :uch sum represents the entire sum to h1 hich said Defendant is
' entitled to receive, recove r a nd be paid in this cause , and Plaintiff,
)y reason of such payment and the agreement of the parties, no\,·
;tan<ls released µnd discharged of its constitutional obligations to
1ay just compensation for the condemnation of the said easement and
ight-of-\..:a}', temporary construct ion eascrncnt and all Jamages incurred
n connection therewith;
( 1 2 ) I' u r s u a n t t o t h e ,\ h"<Jr J o f S pc c i a l Co 111 m i s s i o n e r s h e r c i n ,
laintiff has heretofore paid ancl <lepositcJ the Clmount thereof into
IC R.egistr~· or this Court, and in :1<lditio11 thereto, l'l;1i11tirt' l.;1~
-3 -
'?· .. . ..
OEElJ
vm.17181w;~619
also deli\·ered to the Court a bonJ for an equal sum of money and a
bond for costs, all in full anJ complete compliance with Article
3268, V.A.C.S., which bonds "·ere duly npprovec.1 a11d filec.1 or this
Court.
It is OIWERED, 1\ll.JUDCED anc.1 DECREED tlt;1t Plaj11tiff, SGIINOI.E
PIPELii\E CO~IPANY, a IJeJaHare corporation c.luly autliorized to trnnsact
business in the· State of Texas , do have and recover from Defendant,
an easement an<l right-of-way and a temporarr construction easement
for the purpose of establishing, laying, constructing, maintaining,
inspecting, protecting, operat:ing, repa:iring, altering , cathodically
protecting, reducing the size of, substituting, replricing and
rem o v i n g on s a i <l e a s em en t a 11 <l r i g h t -o £ -'"a y o 11 e (1 ) p i p e 1 i n e n o t t o
exceed fourteen inches (14'') in outside pipe <liameter, together
~·ith such appurtenant facilities necessary or desir;1blc from time
to time in connection with the use anJ convenient operation of
such pipeline for the transportation of oil products, gas, liquificd
-minerals, anJ other mineral solutions, Hhich said cJSelllent CJncJ
right-of-way, sai<l tempor;ny constructi~n casement and the lands
) u t o f ,,. h i c h t h e s <J m e a r e t a k e n a r e m o r e p a r t i c u l a r I y cl e s c r i b c J a s
·ol lOh'S :
A thirty foot (30') "·i<le Penncment Easement and Right-of-\\'ay containing
0. 24 acres of land, more or less, on, in, over, w1der, through and across
that certain 2.43 ;icre tr;ict of l;mJ, more or less, in the 1-1.T. fi B.R.R.
Co. Surver, 1\bstract Ntunber 219 in Brazoria County, Texas, said 2.43 ;icre
tract of l;md bein~ 111orc p;1rticularly described in that certc:dll <leecl d;itec.1
January 16, 1979, from Lee Latino, et U.\, to ~like F. Leggio, Sr., n1.1d
D. C. An<lerson, rccordeJ in \"olw11e 1438, Pnge 023 , of the Deed R.cc0rds of
Rra:oria Cowity, Tcxn5, reference to •d1id1 is herc:in made, said thirty
foot (30 1 ) ,,·i<le Pc1111'1J1c11t Fasernent anJ Right-of-hay being th'enty feet
(20 •) on the Easterly sic.le <md ten feet (10') on the \\'esterl y side of the
follo~ing described survey line:
Begi1ming on the South property line of sa id 2.43 ;:icre tract, a roint
being Northh·est 98.1 feet from the Southeast corner of sniJ tract;
lllENCE t\. 01° 00' E., 2•1 11.6 feet to an angle point;
11-lE~CE N. 6q 0 49' L., 110.8 feet to point of exit on the E:1:-;t prnp•.'rt)·
ine, said point being 76. 0 feet South from the 1~ortheast corner, sa i cl
urve,· line bein~ in ;111 :;:,s.4 feet or 21.53 rnJ~ fo length, 111orc 01 Jes~.
nd .s~id Pen11a.nc~t Easement contains 0.24 acres, more or less.
-;i •. '
· . ...
{.
~!.
I ,.
·~~
... ... . ·-..
.1.'
.I
"·
. -:·
i
~·
~·
UE EIJ
vm 17181wa620
Six (6) Tcmpor:ary Cn11struction J:asc111ents:
]~t l_::1se111~"llt be~ll ~'. rifl t'l'I\ f't't_'I (l '.11) ill h'idtli ;11.1.\ l<K;1tcd pilr:11lc·I,
contJ guous and rnuncd1 ;1l c J)· ;1 d _1 ;icc111 t o lliL· l.;1s tL·rl)' l1111 11 11 l:1n' l i1w 111 · tlil.'
thirty f oot (30') h·.id e pe1111:111e11t C'asc111e11t ;\1 1J right -of'-1v;1v ~lc ~;c ribcd
herc inabo\'e, ;rnd beginning on the South property ljne o f ~;i id 2 .43 acre
tract of Lind;
TllL\CE, ~\Prthc:i s t <"lllll lg tl1c Fa :_;terly l 10 L111d ;1 r~· ur tl1e :tl10 \'C' dcscr il.icd
thirty foot (30 1) "'itl c p enn<lne nt ea~c111c 11 t ;111d ri ght-of-h·;iy.
2nd [:Jse111c11t be ing C.iv e fl'et LS') 11111•jtlth :111d l oc;1t cd p:1r;llkl, cont i ·.:11uus
and inunecliatcly ;1Jj;1ct•n t t o the \\'ester]\· hound:Jn' ljne of the thjrt,· f~0t
(:_;;0'1 h'ide pen11ane;1t c;1 ~e111cnt and ri ):ht .-o[-h-.1)' <l~:~cri becl :ibove , a11d . beginn in g
on the South pro perty ]Jne o[ s a .id 2.!13 acre t1«1ct of J;mJ;
'JllENCE Northeas t alo11 .L! the \\csLerl)' hot111t.1;1ry I inc of Ll1e <iliovc de:;cril1eJ
thjrLy foot (30') 1dtlc pcn11;111 c 11t casc111c11t :JJ1J right -of -h·:iy , be ing in all
a tut al dis tance of 355. 4 feet or 21. 53 rods in J c11gLh , 111cire or less .
3rcl F:ise111c11t bei11g Ci !teen Ccct (!'.',') i11 h'idtli ;111d l oc:1t ed p;1r:1 l l c l,
co11ti1!llOUS <Vld .i111111cd.i ;1tclv ;1tlj;icc11t to the La ~L l1ot u1d ;11y 1i11 e or tl1c ;1huvc
described fifll'Cn fno t (!~1 1 ) Cll11~;trnc ti 1 111 c;1sc111l'llL ;111 d i ic-.~i1111i11~'. 011 tl1 c
North right-of-h':J;' Jinc of St ;1L c lligJ11,·ay 518, Bra:or iu Cu1111ty urHl c~:t c 11din )'.
Nortlie;1q 01\C l1u11Llr cd f eet (100') rro111 qid ri 1:l1t-of-h•;1y line ;ll cm g tl1c
E;i s t hmu1d:i1 ·y o[ the al.i on' described rifteert fool (15') LO l1Stn1c t ion
l'<I C.l'lllCllt.
·1th E<Jscrnent being thirty-five fee t (3S') in h'iJLh <md loc;itcd par;1J1cl ,
contiguous illl<l j111111cdi;1tcly ;i d_i;i ccnt to the \\'esl bo1111da r>' li11e or tl 1e
;1ho\·e dt'scrihcd Ci\'l' r1ll)t LS') COl\S\ J'llL'l i tll l Ci l ~l'llll'lll :lll tl ]1l',l'.ill11i n'1: Oil the
North r.ight --uf-1\:I)' lin t~ <Jf ~)t:1t c lli gl1h·;1 )' :.18, J'.r ;1:.t1 r.i :1 C:nt111ly ;111d t•1:t 1:1 1di11)'.
Northea s t ClllC ln111tlrl'tl fl'L'l l100') lr•Hn s ;iid rii:l1t -o r -"·;1y Jinc ;!long tl1 c
\\'est \Jll\Uldary of tile ;ilio\·e dc sc rilicd liVL;· ruut (~)') Cu11:;tn1c t iu11 -<':1:·.c 111"Jll
Sth Ease111cnt hc i11g Ii 1·t ee11 feet (JS' l in h'idt.11 ;111d Jlic alcJ r1:1r;i1 l e 1,
Cl)11tigt11)us and i111111l'tli ;J1 eh· ;itl_i ;1ce11t t o tl1 e So11tliL'~1'.~t lio u11d;1rr l j 11c o f the:
above described l'ilt cc11 font (IS') co11'.-tn1L"ti o11 c;1~~l'111t·11t ;111d l 1c·.''.i1111i11 ~ 1111
the \\est right -l)r -h·:1~· line or 11.r;1 :orja Ctl\IJll)' Huad t\11111l1cr 111 3 ;111d C.\t l'nd i1l .!'.
Southhe.st one htuidretl ( lllll') fcl'L fro111 '.;aid ri gh t -of-h'<lY J i11 c :il o11g t l1c
Southeast bounJ;iry of the :1bovc described fifteen f oot (lS'I con ~;tn1cti o11
ease111cn t.
6th [:Jscmcnt bejng thi rt)·-five feet (3S ') in "'iu th :ind located 11;1r;-il lel,
contiguous ;rn<l i11uncdintcl y adjacent to the Nort J11,·est ho1u1tbry line of the
;1110\·e tlescrihcd fi\·c font (S') co11stn1ctio11 c;isc111c nt and bei:i1min1: on the
\\·~st rig ht-of-h';1~· line o[ Br:i:oria CoLU1 Ly Ho;iJ ;\1 u11l1cr 103 a11J c.xtc11di11$:'.
Southh·c ~t one hundred fret ( lOO') fro11 1 s;-iid right -o f-h·a~· line a l qng the
\orthh·est bow1dary of the ;ibove described fi\·c foot (S ') construction
easement.
The abo\·e s ix (Cl) le111pora11· Con s Lruc t i on Easements conu1in 0. :i~1 ;icrcs of
land, more or less.
anJ the s:iid easements be anJ the sa111e are h ereb;· vested :in
p l a i n t i f f , S DI I N Cl L E l ' l P L L I N E C 0~1 P J\t~ Y , a D e 1 :i "' a r e c o r p o r a t i o n
July authori:eJ to tran s act busines s in the S tate o f Tcx:is,
t o g e t Ii c r ". i t h t he r :i g h t o f i 11 g r c s s a 11 J c g r c ~ 5 , ,,. h i c h r i ~: Ii t o r
ingres s and egress sha11 h e s trictly Jirnjt c J and confincJ t o
-s -
"J ... . "
.,
;
~·
OCED
VOL 17181'~1il·621
the boundaries of the easement and right-of-\.o:ay ancJ the hounc.1aries
of the temporar:.-construction casement; provjdcd , hoh'ever,
that Plaintiff's right of ingress and egres s h'ith re s pect to
the tcmpor<.Jr)' construction easement shall terlllinatc upon
completion of the construct .ion of the s aid pipeline upon the
easement and right-of-h·ay or at 12:00 noon 0 11 .Ja11uary 1st, 198 2 ,
\\°11 i c he \' e r o c cu r s f i r s t .
It is further ORDERED, J\DJUOGED and llf:Cl ~Er:n that tl1e s aid
temporary construction easeJ11cnt will be used and occupied by
Plaintiff only during the period of initial construction of
t h e a f o r e s a i d p i p e 1 in e on t h e e a s em en t a n cJ r i g h t -o f -''a y an d
upon completion of the initial construction of said pipeline,
or at 12:00 noon on Janu~1ry 1st, 1982, ,,·JJichever occurs fi.1-st ,
the said tclllporary co115truction casement sh;1J1 thereupon
autolllatically terminate and revert to the Oh'ners of the land
covere<l by said temporary construction eascrnc11t, free and
c 1e3 r of an)' right , t i t 1 e or inter cs t i 11 I' 1;1 i n t i ff, an J that
as of the date of this order , said t c 111 pas a r )' construction
e 3 s em e 11 t h a s t e r Ill i 1w t e d .
Jt is further OIWEHED, J\OJUDGED ;rnJ DECREED that Plaintiff
ha v e an J re c o \' e r t h c f o l l o ". i n g r i g h t s :
(1) the right of ingress and egress, h'hich right of
ingress and egress shall be strictly lirnited and confined to
t he b o u n cJ a r i e s o f t he Ea s em e n t , ,,. i t h P 1 a i n t i f f ' s r i g h t o f
ingress and egress in connection h'ith the Temporary Construc .tion
I
Easement terminating upon the termination of the Temporary
:onstruction Easement as aforesaid.
(2) the right to cathodically protect its said pipeline
· i t h i n t he b o u n <l <• r i c s o r t h c Ea s e 111 c n t an d t o p 1 a c e p j p e 1 i n c
arl\crs anJ cathoJic protection test lcaJs hithin the bound;nic·~
f the Easement at or rea sonab ly near fence ljnes and road
·ossings.
( 3 ) t he r i g h t t o p r c v c 11 t t h c c o n ~ t r u c t 1 o n , i-· i t li i n t l 1 t ·
u n Jar i cs of t h c [as c 111t'11 t ;rn d t h c r i g ht t o r c 111 o \. e t he re from ,
\' bu i l d i n ~ or st r u ct u r c c .:x cc pt ~ s Ii c r c in JH o \' i <l c cl for .
. ..
0[[0
·vot 17181·AG~ 622
lt is further OIWEl~ED , AD.JUDGED ant.I DECIU'.ElJ tl1at there are
rescn·eJ to Defendllnt, hi .s heirs, successors a11d ;1ssig11 s , each ;ind
all of the follo1dng rj!~ht s h'ith refcrc11 cc t o the :1bove described
property covered by the Sllid easement ant.I right-of-h'a)':
(1) Plaintiff shall have 110 above-ground structures 1dthin
the boundaries of the Easement except for the pipeline markers anJ ,.
cathodic protection test leaJs aforesaid .
(2) The pipeline constructed by the Plaintiff h'i thin the
boundaries of the Easement shall be buried to a minimum depth of
forty-eight (48) inches below the surface of the grounJ at the time
of construction, measured from the top of the pipe to the surface
of the ground.
( .3 ) J> 1 a i n t i f f s h :i l 1 n o t f c 11 c e ll o r o t h c r h' i .s e e 11 c J o s e s a i J
.. Easement, or anr part thereof.
(4) In the event it becomes necessary for Plaintiff, at any
ti m c and from t i 111 e to t i 111 e , i 11 conn e c t i on 1.,i i t h t he c on s t r u c t i o 11 o r
.operation 1dthin the bound:-iries of the Ease111e11t, to cut any feJJces ,
l l a i n t i ff , b e f o r e c u t t i 11 g s u c h [en c e , s h a_ 1 1 f i r s t s c t b r n c e µo s t s
on each siJe of the La ~c 111cnt or Tcmporarr Construc ti on Easc111cnt,
: and at t a ch a 11 ex i s t i n g 1,· i re s to such bra c e po s t be fore cu t t j n g a n y
s u c h fen c e o r f c n c e s , t h e p u r po s e o f 1,• h i c h i s t o p r e v c 11 t t h e h i r c
fences from slackening or sagging due to Plaintiff's operations or
activities in or upon the Easement. In t lli s connection , P 1 a inti ff
sh a 11 u s e 1,· i re g a p s o r t em po r a r y g a t e s Ju r i n g o r i g i n a 1 c o n s t r u c t i o n
ictiivities or operations sufficient to prevent cattle or livestock
:rom entering or lea,·ing Defendant's property. After the original
:onst ruction is completed, Plaintiff shall remove its 1,·ire gaps or
emporary gates .and shall restore the fences to as gooJ a condition
s the same were in i111111ediately prior to Plaintiff's cutting of
aid fences.
(S) J\11 oil, gas :ind other minerals in, on, and under the
1 s e rn en t a c qui red he re i n , p r o v i Jed , ho 1.,i eve r , t ha t 1J e [end ant s ha 1 1
1 t be perm i t t e d to J r i 1 l or op c r a t e Io r 111 i 11 c r a 1 s on t he s u r f :"\cc o f
1 e Ea s c 111 c n t , but h' i l l b c pc rm i t t e cl t o c x t r a c t o i 1 a n d Io r ;1d n c r c!l s
om and under the casement by direction:ll Jrilling or other 111c;111~,
-7 -
_., .. . ..:.
UEEU
vot 17181·AG~623
so long as Plaintiff's use of the Easement is not <listurbe<l, which
shall include the right of Plni11tiff to ph)'sicnlly support and
maintain a minimum cover uround anr pipeljne ins talled by Plaintiff
\d t h i n t he b o u n d a r i e s o f t he Ea s e 111 en t a s re 4 u i re d b )' a n y 1 a"' o r
regulation as well as the right that sc.dd pipeline s hall not be
endangered, obstructed, or interfered ~ith;
(6) The right to pass back and fonh across tlic Ensernent on
foot or in vehicles, to cultivate or lanJscape the same; to raise
crops or garde 11 s therein ; to graze ca t t 1 e <111 d 1 iv es tock there i n ; to
layout, de<licate, construct and maintain roads, streets, alleys,
railroad tracks, ditches, irrigation canals, underground communication
conduits, electric transmissions lines, telephone lines, an<l gas,
h'ater, drainage, anJ sewer pipelines across the 1:;1serne11t ilt ;i11y
angle of not less than 45 degrees to said pipcli11e; n11d to use ~a.id
· 1 and f o r r c c re a t i on o r f o r a 11 )' o t h e r pu r po s C' , no t i n c o n s i s t c n t ,,. i t h
Plai.ntiff's use nnd enjoyment of the Easement for the purpu-;L's set
forth herein; proviJcd, however, Plaintiff's facjlities will not be
obs t r u c t e d , end .:in g ere d or i n t er fer e d w i t b ; n n J f u r th c r pro\' id c d
that the surface an<l subsur f;:icc of any s uch ronds, st rec ts, a 1 J cys,
railroad tracks, ditches, irrigation cannls, conduits or gas,
Kater, Jrainage or seh·er pipelines will be so constructcJ as to
insure a minimum cover for Plaintiff's pipeline ns required by any
law or regulation and further provided that said pipeline is left
,.;i th proper, sufficient, and permancn t support.
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Clerk of
.he Court out of the funds heretofore deposited by Plaintiff in the
egistry of this Court, shall pay and refund to Plaintiff the sum
f $11,640.0U·, being the total amount heretofore paid and deposited
~· Plaintiff in the Registry of this Court in this cause.
It is further OIUJEl~Ell, J\DJUDCED and DECREED that a ,,Tit of
, s s e s s i on b e i s s u e d i n b c h ;i 1 f o f P 1 a i n t i f f ". i t h re s r e c t t o t h c
sement and right-of-h"<.lf as hereinabove Jescribc<l, and that no
it of possession is5uc h'ith respect to the temporary construction
s cm en t s ".hi ch ha\' e C' x pi r c J o f t he i r o"' n t c n11 s .
-s -
-Jt ,I
··--·------
1 • H".J. 8 B.R.R. CO. Survey , A-219 ·'..
j Brazoria · County , Texas
I
MIKE F. LEGGIO, SR. a D. C. ANDERSON
144-TX-BA-197(2)
DETAIL "s"
1"11.'I I
SURVEY LINE
---1FM·518l1---
n ""J 1~ Jcr ~ ,<C .., t~ z Cl. ~ ~-I[ .... t.'
.Q
Vt" LP.
NOl0 0o'E
244.61
~ ' IC
.... z ..,
z .. :i
I[ .... A.
·o ...
76 o·
,.,,
0
d a:
d u
I RODS= 21.53
1 PERMANENT R/W = 0. 24 Ac.
TEMPORARY R/W = 0 .39 Ac.
ci a:
0 u
I
It .. DETAIL A
111 =1001
DETAIL"B"
1"=401
DETAIL "c"
111 =1001 ...... ·Exh1b1t A
Page lof 2
t.UllHGS DClllVEO fllOW 0££0 . 1\.0. BK.• IA-I , ,.C>.19
SEMINOLE PIPELINE COMPANY PROPOSED 14" PIPELINE CROSSING
MIKE F. LEGGIO , SR. a D. C. ANDERSON
BAAZORIA CO TEXAS \
ll[V.
,.~ .. -------..--_-___ -_-.-.. ---:-. --:-. -:-_ .:'."'". ---:i~o":.:::~:.:.:=."'-7:~--=---::~=~='=~::--:. -=-=-=.:-:.7.:_:-::_o-,:_::-:_=-=-·. 1a a.,. rx: ~et., 1g1 I?.\
I •
I _
I .
DEED
voL 1718rh1;~ 625
THE STATE OF TEXAS )
COUNTY OF BRAZORIA )
I, Dolly Bailey, Clerk of the County Court, in and for Brazoria
County, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and
correct copy of that certain_--'F"-'i=n~a~l=--.;J"'"'u=d=p:.'"""qn=e...,.r-'-'1 t~-----------
in Cause No. 10, ?03 , styled Seminole Pipeline Company Vs.
_M~i~k~e~F~·~L~e~g_g_i~o~·~S~r_._.~e~t~a_l~----' on the --~C~i~v~i=l=------
Docket, as the same appears on file and in the office of the County Clerk of
:,.Brazoria County, Texas .
.'I ,' ...
... . · :': .. . !'
. ,!·:
office at Angleton, Texas, this
Jul_..Y.__ __ , A.D., 19~8_3~-
Dolly Bailey, Clerk County Court,
in and for Brazoria County, Texas.
By ~ >n .L7;;;)
Annie M. Senter
FILED FOR R.EGORD
JuL I 2 s s PM '8 3
:./ .· . ~.., .·,:,) .i.-4-._ ,. IJ
COUNTY CUM lllU~IA COUN'rY. T~I
Dep1:1ty
• >
~ .' DEED
voL 171R1·A1;1-624
It is further 01\DERED, 1\DJUDGED and DECREED th;..lt J>lnintiff pay
all costs of Court in this proceeding, and that Plaintiff having
paid such costs, the .bonds heretofore depositc<l h'ith the Court by
Plaintiff shall cease and terminate and b(' of no further force and
effect, and the sureties on said bonds are hereby discharged from
liability thereon.
A 11 re 1 i e f · s o u g h t h c r e i n b )' a 11 )' o f t h c pa I" t i e s he r c t o , ,,. h i c h
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KEE & PATTERSON
P. 0. Box 700
Angleton, Texas 77515
713/849-5772
I FULBRIGHT & JAKORSKI
Bank of the Southwest Building
Houston, Texas 77002
Br:~l 0)(YJ_l ~ Fren~-f-l
State Bar No. 119090
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
SEMINOLE PIPELINE COt-lP.'\NY
\\'I LLIA~I II.
2919 Allen
Houston, T
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFEND . .\l\TS
Ml t\E F. LEGG I 0, SR. , CULLEN LANDIS, EXECUTOR ,
OF THE ESTA TE OF D. c. ,\NDERSON, DECEASED, nu om
GREGORY, EXECUTQR OF TllE ESTATE OF D. C. ~NDERSOt\, ,
DECEASED, LINDA LOU /\NDLHSON, RONALD CLEON AN~E~SON~ LINDA
CARROL PLATZ, LARRY DOl\ ANDERSON AND CHARL\)TTE KAY KOGER
-9 -
. u