The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-09-18 P&Z AGENDAMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, HELD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 3519 LIBERTY DRIVE, PEARLAND, TEXAS. The meeting was called to order with the following present: Chairman Pat Lopez Vice Chairman Emil Beltz Commissioner Randy Patro Commissioner Robert Larsen Commissioner Peggy Mayfield -Royer (arrived 7:06 p.m.) Commissioner Marshall Eggers Assistant City Richard Burdine Manager City Engineer John Hargrove Ass't. Director of Wendy Standorf Administrative Svcs. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of August 21, 1995 A motion to approve the minutes of the 8-21-95 meeting was made by Commissioner Robert Larsen and seconded by Commissioner Emil Beltz. Motion Passed 5 to 1. NEW BUSINESS Preliminary Plat Meadowview Section 1 at Silverlake & Preliminary Plat Silverlake Commercial Park Phase One. City Engineer Hargrove recommended tabling these agenda items. The developer was unable to get approval by the Brazoria County Drainage District #4. Commissioner Robert Larsen made the motion, seconded by Commissioner Marshall Eggers to table the Preliminary Plat of Meadowview Section 1 at Silverlake and the Preliminary Plat of Silverlake Commercial Park, Phase 1. Motion Passed 6 to 0. Final Plat Sunset Lakes, Section 2. Al Lentz representing Lentz Engineering was present requesting approval of the final plat of Sunset Lakes, Section 2. Dominick Basile of 1101 Lochmoor addressed the Commission on behalf of the Riverwalk Homeowners Association. He stated that the homeowners object to the opening of Chelsea Lane. He presented a petition (copy attached as Exhibit A) signed by a number of the home owners within the Riverwalk Subdivision requesting that Chelsea Lane remain closed. Mr. Basile also wanted to know who, why and how it was decided to open Chelsea Lane and he requested clarification on the approval process for subdivisions. Assistant City Manager Richard Burdine informed the Commission that when Riverwalk Subdivision was platted, the intention was for the street to be opened at some point because it was platted as a "stub" street and not a cul-de-sac. He stated that the City Council does not act on plat approval. Commissioner Jeffeiy O'Brien asked Mr. Burdine what the advantages and disadvantages would be for the street opening. Mr. Burdine stated that the disadvantage would continue an unintended "super cul-de-sac", and the advantage would allow the additional access that was intended. City Engineer Hargrove recommended approval with the corrections as specified. Bud Goza representing Lingo Properties, developer, asked if it was possible for the Riverwalk Homeowners Association to install a 911 gate for emergency access. Randy Hutchins of 1302 Chelsea Lane also addressed the Commission stating that he did not want the street open because of the danger of the added traffic. There are a number of small children within the subdivision. There was additional discussion regarding 911 gates. Commissioner Randy Patro made the motion, seconded by Jeffery O'Brien to reject the final plat of Sunset Lakes Section 2 as submitted. There was additional discussion and Jeffery O'Brien with- drew his second. Motion Failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Marshall Eggers made the motion, to approve the final plat of Sunset Lakes, Section 2 with consideration of a 911 gate after discussion with the Police Department and the Fire Chief. There was additional discussion and Marshall Eggers withdrew his motion. 2 Motion withdrawn. Commissioner Jeffery O'Brien made the motion, seconded by Commissioner Peggy Mayfield -Royer to approve the final plat of Sunset Lakes, Section 2 with the required corrections. REQUIRED CORRECTIONS: 1. Correction of 2 monument notes. 2. Add Commissioner Randy Patros name to the plat. Motion Passed 5 to 2. (Commissioners voting "aye": Pat Lopez, Emil Beltz, Marshall Eggers, Jeffery O'Brien and Peggy Mayfield -Royer; Commissioners voting "no" Randy Patro and Robert Larsen). The Commission recessed for five (5) minutes at 8:02 p.m.. Discussion of Possible Changes to the Land Use and Urban Development Ordinance (No. 509) and Direction to Staff on a date for a Public Hearing at Which to Consider said Changes. Mr. Burdine asked the Commission in which zoning districts they would consider dropping the facade requirements. Lengthy discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the Commission for the wording to include "All walls facing major thoroughfares shall meet the 75% rule". The Commission advised staff to set the Public Hearing for the earliest possible date. Next Meeting Date: The next meeting date will be October 2, 1995. Director's Report. None. Adjourned: 9:14 p.m. Minutes approved as submitted A.D., 1995. Pat Lopez, 3 To: Pearland Planning and Zoning Commission From: Riverwalk Homeowners Association Subject Petition to allow Chelsea Lane to remain closed Attached please find a listing of signatures of Riverwalk residents, by address, that indicates support of leaving Chelsea Lane closed (against expansion). Some of the signatures (8) , indicated by a "NO" in the name column identify those residents who are in favor of the expansion. The remaining (80) signatures were signed by the residents with the intent of expressing their opinion that the street should remain closed. The summary totals are as follows: 80 AGAINST EXPANSION 8 FOR EXPANSION 88 TOTAL CONTACTED D.D.Basile,President RHOA "EXHIBIT A" PETITION TO STOP CHELSEA LANE EXTENSION ADDRESS I PHONE SPRINTED NAME SIGNATURE 3501 RIVERSIDE g DRIVE 3503 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3505 RIVERSIDE � �(\,(�\(� 3507 RIVERSIDE 4 -a DRIVE L, C W'4 / N S 3509 RIVERSIDE DRIVE . .� -- 3511 RIVERSIDE Zil DRIVE 3513 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 1, 4 '�Z2� �( 4-Z3-16 -S"Z--3 ��0�1I IPO V v M/1-i_ J 1. z.j 3515 RIVERSIDE DRIVE //gy�p r _ __ C W N W L-& S 3517 RIVERSIDE DRIVE Qq 1' q6 3 oo��i`RU9d 3519 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3521 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 02_9�61 R�ca� UG 3523 RIVERSIDE G�( J 3525 RIVERSIDE7(_� �9 DRIVE DRIVE �D T 3529 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3531 RIVERSIDE M No X f 3533 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3535 RIVERSII- DRIVE -/ 3701 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3703 RIVERSIDE DRIVE DAF S4 FPE` _ v►'V 3705 RIVERSIDE�� DRIVE "t U �� d � �( d 3706 RIVERSIDE /eh DRIVE _ h i6L, 3707 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3708 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3709 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 3710 RIVERSIDE q�_ ✓�y�� DRIVE _ _ 3711 RIVERSIDE JO DRIVE 3713 RIVERSIDE o43' ________________ 7 DRIVE 3�9 ADDRESS I PHONE I PRINTED NAME 4 ; �j_ - I SIGNATURE 1101 CAMELOT LANE Gip / a073S ZiVAA £)(K)S%I CJ 1102 CAMELOT LANE 1103 CAMELOT qp l t. 073 V� Si ► i',� LANE 1104 CAMELOT LANE 1105 CAMELOT Q 1106 CAMELOT ___________ LANE 1107 CAMELOT,` J LANE2'0 4.- J L1108 ANE CAMELOT � � Q (l q l M ` `��5I7 -S? 1110 CAMELOT LANE 1114 CAMELOT LANE n CI CJ I �/ Sa"�3 SQl f Q l G3 if 1it 1 Iti ADDRESS I PHONE SPRINTED NAME I SIGNATURE X X 1101 LOCHMOORE LANE J k 1102 LOCHMOORE LANE 3 Z3 `3'9 _________ 1103 LOCHMOORE LANE 1104 LOCHMOORE q4113 ► N cC- E"5 -7r— V E - LANE j S LI 1105 LOCHMOORE LANE 1106 LOCHMOORE q qj � '/ V "` i� NN � /)4V'5 yJ � LANE r ^� l 3 ' l�J 1107 LOCHMOORE LANE qq 10 7e• } ;C1wr 0 Moo -re. o t{q-Ie' 7% - 1108 LOCHMOORE LANE _/9e/33` - 5 c 1= L -\-A ? t 11 1-i , T y —o c`�. 1112 LOCHMOORE LANE 1113 LOCHMOORE p G F E -AA x %mss LANE 1114 LOCHMOORE LANE fr t/ !� ,ql e .3 Z. 6 tf�� 1115 LOCHMOORE I -P* v e` /, fl% c LANE 4g2 113 S ,6 6 2 - O ? q 111 LOCHMOORE LANE 0�"�'�� 1 / M4 I� � L -b SL, vim 4 1119 LOCHMOORE LANE 1120 LOCHMOORE LANE 3605 LOCHMOORE LANE ) �� l� 3607 LOCHMOORE LANE a 1- O° 2 -15 Lp -1Q1 299 3608 LOCHMOORE LANE I ga 3S� Z Ob c cdl fi'l cof e s2k j (U� _�3 3 -5 q 99 1 s � 9 3609 LOCHMOORE 2"/43 S''"A ' 2-' '"n►'`, LANE q Z -I SS 3 610 LOCHMOORE q%a - 91 a a jpjj A. IC ;n5ey LANE 3 611 LOCHMOORE i( /6i,7/,a %2//4/a LANE 3612 LOCHMOORE L� 8� JAY RICHARDSON LANE / 4 �l f9 � ` Lf 5 C1 Iv RL 36 LOCHMOORE LANE �j 4W,? ��—J �✓'/�(f�Q/Ca�Y 0 3 614 LOCHMOORE BEVERLY GREENE 3 615 LOCHMOORE LANE f A -0(0) 3 - 3616 LOCHMOORE nni MARK BRIGGS LANE 117 10 % q -L7 3737 /1 3 617 LOCHMOORE 5 //.%� ) L L& 't/i✓c) LANE ! Q /J J / f 1S — fI / L'�u C� 3 618 LOCHMOORE qGi z _Q 3(�7 MICHAEL GEORGE LANES_ 3 619 LOCHMOORE �j�-/ 1OZ �L LANE o V/ q5'41) - 3620 LOCHMOORE LANE eli (, j, i.Li m f 3622 LOCHMOORE 1(8Z777S_ LANE / 3624 LOCHMOORE Lik G� 9 NAME I PHONE I PRINTED NAME QL' ). `). 4 I SIGNATURE 1101 MERRIBROOK��-�5P y LANE o% 3 3 rQ �t 2 /�.'" —� 1102 MERRIBROOK LANE : (: I%.��- k444t(A AWl CVQ 4 c. G, 1103 MERRIBROOK C7 Z iiLL 1104 MERRIBROOK LANE 1105 MERRIBROOK LANE G� r `lob `l L P-- FL-,►�N?`� cL- !l �- s-3 - lL i 1106 MERRIBROOK LANE 1107 MERRIBROOK fi !� ,I� Zf33 J Y LANE [ 1108 MERRIBROOK j r7 $ I1/ i L,-k//Z)5 LANE f + (.t__�- 1109 MERRIBROOK � 2,/ �✓ LANE I I 1110 MERRIBROOK LANE 1111 MERRIBROOK LANE 1112 MERRIBROOK LANE 1113 MERRIBROOK LANE 1114 MERRIBROOK LANE V-092Jr J(/C kk- �, 1115 MERRIBROOK p _ j� 1116 MERRIBROOK (;p LANE `"l 1 Cc �� B-� 1118 MERRIBROOK ; P, Q ADDRESS I PHONE I PRINTED NAME '8W I SIGNATURE 1101 CHELSEA L55oI L) LANE 1102 CHELSEA LANE ,'ti'O 1103 CHELSEA ___________________ LANE 1104 CHELSEA LANE 1 Qua- 6 V 7 11 ,/ NvAk4do 1105 CHELSEA f � O LANE U 1106 CHELSEA d`' n d LANE -v U&<J!fl. 1107 CHELSEA LANE LANE 1108 CHELSEA I7L�Z 1 6G�0�(5 1109 CHELSEA O p d MAP -CIA KA SKA LANE r f r 5 - Oc , — 4 oo . �Ct X111O CHELSEA ANE /L)O 1111 CHELSEA __________________ LANE 1112 CHELSEA LANE 1113 CHELSEA �� LANEgg 1 7/ 1114 CHELSEA LANE 1115 CHELSEA LANE 1116 CHELSEA LANE 1118 CHELSEA LANE 1201 CHELSEA LANE 'A Q IN �fl 1202 CHELSEA ��dR `A LANE 1203 CHELSEA it3� LANE .0iLo5 1204 CHELSEA _03?'5 I 1205 CHELSEA /�a y�� `� � y Q2,� rc -, LANE y c O ?c/ Y 1206 CHELSEA ___________ LANE 1207 CHELSEA LANE 4L2 0- &-7-g3( 1208 CHELSEA LANE 1208 CHELSEA f q2- 21/ 9 c1U/ u % LIUyNfi LANE 1209 CHELSEA LANE 1210 CHELSEA LANE 193 L,YLGk� t Q r (p-- 8 b - iO ��UIfCJ 1211 CHELSEA - net �- ms LANE �S 9 �6 9jop9 1212 CHELSEA, 4 a S LANE - 1214 CHELSEA I -f 5. '' ' i:7' � f, LANE - B- CHELSEA ] ^14i'&ss4 9 e1, -?AAzR, L1216 ANE 1218 CHELSEA LANE �o1-1 QJ t I c r e 1220 CHELSEA LANE 1222 CHELSEA99 �) 2S �� j LANE (- v Zo - 1302 CHELSEA LANE 3fje 4AvN flu.*ch/AU95 'f t` LJ - - Z2 1304 CHELSEA LANE (On' EdJCcr 1306 CHELSEA LANE IN b 1308 CHELSEA LANE �l /`/L 7 �� d67 T �%1M/< //�LL 4157-O6- 85/ - j. (Untitled) 8-14-95 Riverwalk Home Owners Association RHOA items for Pearland City Council Mtg. Address the Group * Mr/Mrs mayor, Ladies and Gentleman of the Council * My name is: Dominick Basile, I am the President of the RHOA * Our sub -division is located at the Eastern most edge of Pearland and accesses from FM518. * Thank you for this opportunity to speak tonight Our Business We are here tonight to raise the awareness level of the Council to a position we collectively hold as a sub -division. It has come to our attention that a proposal is going to come to the Council, from the PandZ board, to open Chelsea Ln. through to the proposed addition to the Sun -Meadow sub -division, which is adjacent to Riverwalk. We are opposed to the opening of this road. supporting arguments * We have a petition signed by,'4, of the 126 homes in the sub -division stating their opposition * 50% of the houses on Chelsea Ln. have only one car garages and driveways,causing an already narrow street to experience traffic flow problems due to necessary "on street" parking * Pearland police and numerous newspaper and magazine articles offer the opinion that sub -divisions that have multiple access and egress are more easily made burglary targets than those with single access and egress. We now have only 1 way in and out, and a very low incidence of crime. * Based on physical testing, emergency response time would not be positively impacted unless the response originated deep in.either the Riverwalk or Sun -Meadow sub -division and was targeted to"pick up" deep in the opposite sub -division. A highly unlikely scenario, when no response teams originate in these areas. * We have not been given any reason or arguments that enable ud to see a positive result of opening this street. We have only heard hearsay, that the school bus drivers after picking up in Riverwalk "don't like" to go back out to FM 518 to get to Sun -Meadow to get their children. Page 1 (Untitled) Other Considerations * Proposals that impact an identifiable portion of the residents should be discussed with those residents. This is the second time that this proposal is coming up and neither time were we asked for input. * We are disappointed that both the aforementioned instances were discovered by RHOA officers through "third party" conversations, and not by direct contact from the city. We believe that the city owes it's residents more respect than this kind of lack of communication portends. Our Requests 1. We respectively request that when this issue is placed on the PandZ meeting agenda, the RHOA be notified to allow for our argument and petition presentation at the meeting. 2. When, and if, the Planning and Zoning Board recommends the opening of Chelsea Ln. to the City Council for a vote, please take our viewpoint as seriously as opposing viewpoints. 3. Please cast your vote, on this issue, based on whatever is best for those residents who are directly affected by your decision. Thank you. Respectfully, r' Dominick D. Basile Wo ex 71,3 . a3S y3oS ,c1 7,3 99( r 733 Page 2 To: Pearland Planning and Zoning Commission From: Riverwalk Homeowners Association Subject Petition to allow Chelsea Lane to remain closed Attached please find a listing of signatures of Riverwalk residents, by address, that indicates support of leaving Chelsea Lane closed (against expansion). Some of the signatures (8) , indicated by a "NO" in the name column identify those residents who are in favor of the expansion. The remaining (80) signatures were signed by the residents with the intent of expressing their opinion that the street should remain closed. The summary totals are as follows: 80 AGAINST EXPANSION 8 FOR EXPANSION 88 TOTAL CONTACTED D.D.Basile,President RHOA SUGGESTED EXCEPTIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS TO ORDINANCE 509 SECTION 9.4.U), MF Access: There shall be provided a minimum of two (2) driveways per lot, no portion of which shall bean closer than fifteen Y .. ( 15) feet to adjacent lot lines. One dzavewa may be permitted on lots less than 10' in width or I and 2 family dw liut SECTION 11.4.1(7), OP Access: A minimum of two driveways shall be required with no portion thereof closer than fifteen (15) feet to an adjacent lot line ono driveway may be permitted on lots than 110' teach of 1 and 2 family dwellings, unless otherwise approved by the City. SECTION 12.4.(7), NS Access: Each lot shall have not less than two driveways with exterior driveways no closer than fifteen (1 5) feet from the adjacent lot line. One driveway may be permitted on lots less than 110 to width Qr l and 2 famtl dweltii s or as otherwise approved by the City. SECTION 13.4.(7), GB Access: Each lot shall have not less than two (2) driveways no closer than twenty-five (25) feet from adjacent lot lines. One ` 1 driveway may be pernutted on lots less than 110' to width or I and 2 faintl dwellut s, unless otherwise approved by the City. SECTION 14.4.(7), C Access: Each lot shall have not less than two (2) driveways with exterior driveways no closer than twenty-five (25) feet from the adjacent lot line Erne (1) driveway may bepermitted on lots less than 14' m width or, l and 2 familydwellings, or as otherwise approved by the City. SECTION 19.4.3(a) Access and Maneuvering (a) Entrances and/or costs exits shall be so located as to minimize traffic congestion. Driveways shall be located so that the opening, including turning radii, is no closer than 45:1..5 feet to the end of a street intersection curb return. In no case shall such entrance or exit be closer than 3-5 25 feet from the intersection of any extended curb line. Cul-de-sacs and eyebrows are exempt from this requirement. The width of the opening of entrances and exits measured at the property line, not including the turning radii of the driveway apron between the property line and the adjacent curb, shall be not less than twelve (12) feet in R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 areas and not less than twenty five (25) feet in any district nor more than thirty-five (35) feet in any district. Between any two (2) adjacent entrances or exits serving the same parking facility there shall be provided at the property line a separation of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. Beyond the required number of driveways for each district, there shall be permitted no more than one additional driveway for each on hundred (100) feet of lot width above the minimum lot width. Common driveways may be allowed upon approval of the City. SECTION 19.5.1. Paving and Drainage All off-street parking areas shall be paved with not less than five (5) inches of reinforced Portland cement t concrete rfour(#-iiiches on compacted subgrade, or one and one-half.(I 112) inches of hot -mixed asphaltic cement concrete i an on five (5) inches of approved granular base on six (fi) inches of lime treated subbase, or equal.' as approved by the Director of Public Works This is required to provide an adequate all-weather surface to the bundling line. Parking areas shall be graded and drained in such manner that run-off shall be properly channeled into a storm drain water course, ponding area, or other approved facility. addition to ordinance remove from ordinance Discuss the definition of Accessory Use (page 5). Under minimum lot size in all business zones, add the notation, "See Section 24.2.1 for exception". Section 13.4.8 appears to be in conflict with the schedule of uses, page 87, Tavern. Section 20.6. Building Facades (12) Sig ns, 0tobsolete :::::::<:>_; which no longer v' components..hereof,advertise a bona fide business ...:...........::.:.::.....::.....:......... Section 22.17. Builder/Subdivision and Subdivision Indentification Signs. (1) One builder/subdivision sign may be located at the main entrance of subdivision. Four (4) additional directional signs may be located off, sits:" appropriate locations with no such sign closer than feet to any other:: new i 3 at AGENDA - REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18,1995, at 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, 3519 LIBERTY DRIVE, PEARLAND, TEXAS. I. CALL TO ORDER H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of August 21, 1995 III. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION - Preliminary Plat approval of Meadowview Section 1 at Silverlake, a subdivision of 22.5448 acres of land out of the John W. Maxey Survey, Abstract No. 721, Brazoria County, Texas. 1. Variance request of Section 27-4(D)(1)(a) of the Subdivision Ordinance to allow for 20 -foot building line setbacks on lots fronting the bulb portion of cul-de-sacs and to allow five (5) foot side lot building setback lines. B. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION - Prelirninaiy Plat approval of Silverlake Commercial Park, Phase 1, a subdivision of 5.5310 acres of land out of the John W. Maxey Survey, Abstract No. 721, Brazoria County, Texas. C. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION - Final Plat approval of Sunset Lakes, Section 2, a subdivision of 29.9375 acres in the James E. Perry and Emily Austin League, Abstract No. a-111, Pearland, Brazoria County, Texas. D. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION - Discussion of Possible Changes to the Land Use and Urban Development Ordinance (No. 509) and Direction to Staff on a Date for a Public Hearing at Which to Consider Said Changes. IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: October 2, 1995 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORT VI. ADJOURNMENT Posted: Day of , A.D., 1995,1 Removed:)/3 Day of , A.D., 1995