R2006-010 01-23-06
RESOLUTION NO. R2006-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND,
TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH KIRST KOSMOSKI, INC., FOR
WASTEWATER SYSTEM MODELING, ANALYSIS AND PLANNING
SERVICES.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS:
Section 1. That certain contract by and between the City of Pearland and Kirst
Kosmoski, Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof
for all purposes, is hereby authorized and approved.
Section 2. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute
and the City Secretary to attest a contract with Kirst Kosmoski, Inc., for wastewater system
modeling, analysis and planning services.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 23rd day of January
A.D., 2006.
~n>.-J
TOM REID
MAYOR
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
lJa--:. ~
DARRIN M. COKER
CITY ATTORNEY
~ J f,j\
() ')~. . 'vt.
\ ~\
Texas \/
Exhibit "A"
Resolution 2006-10
r"\
CITY OF PEARLAND
STANDARD AGREEMENT
FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
"
1'<'
This Contract (Contract) is made between the City of Pearland,
(hereinafter "City"), and Kirst Kosmoski, Inc.. (hereinafter "Engineer") as follows:
1. Summary of Contract Terms. The following information and referenced documents
shall be a part of this Contract:
Description of Project: Provide the City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling,
Analysis and Planning.
En ineer/Subconsultant s
Kirst Kosmoski, Inc.
ensation
Fee
$325,435.00
Maximum Contract Amount $325,435.00 Lump Sum
* All financial obligations created by this agreement are between the City and
Engineer, and shall not be construed to be between City and any subconsultant.
Delivery of plans, specifications and estimates: See schedule
Attachments: Scope of Services - Exhibit A
Rate Schedule - Exhibit B
2. Services and Payment.
Engineer shall perform services within the Standard of Care of the Engineering
profession as follows:
A. Engineer will furnish services to the City in accordance with the terms and
conditions specified in this Contract. Payment for the services of Engineer shall be due
and payable upon submission and approval of a statement for services to City.
Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly.
After consultation with the City, the Engineer shall specify the basis of
compensation in the scope of work for the project. The Engineer shall provide adequate
detail of the basis of compensation so that the City can determine the reasonableness
of the fees and have the ability to make reasonable progress payments to the Engineer
based upon work completed at the payment intervals. The Engineer shall subcontract
for all subconsultants, subject to City approval, necessary to complete the scope of
work. The subconsultant's fees and administrative mark-up, if any, shall be included in
the scope of work. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the method of compensation shall
be one of the following methods:
~
-\\-
~ ,0' '>J i
ufO-
\9
1. Salary Cost Times Multiplier Plus Direct Nonsalary Expense ("Salary")
Compensation shall be based on 1) the direct salaries (including benefits)
of the Engineer's employees whose time is directly chargeable to the
project; 2) an agreed upon multiplier to compensate the Engineer for
overhead and profit; and 3) reimbursement for direct nonsalary
expenditures and subconsultant contracts as defined in the scope of work
for the project. The Engineer shall provide a proposal that includes the
total fees for the project, which shall not be exceeded without prior City
approval.
2. Per Diem ("Per Diem")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) an agreed upon lump sum per day
for specific services; and 2) reimbursement for direct nonsalary
expenditures and subconsultant contracts as defined in the scope of work
for the project. This method is best suited to expert witness work or other
short-term engagements involving intermittent services.
3. Cost Plus Fixed Fee ("Cost Plus")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) reimbursement of the actual costs
of all services and supplies related to the project and 2) an agreed upon
fixed fee (profit). The Engineer shall provide an estimate of the costs to
be reimbursed, but actual compensation shall be based upon invoices and
supporting documentation provided by the Engineer.
4. Lump Sum ("Lump")
Compensation shall be based upon an agreed lump sum payment for
completing the entire scope of work. This method is best suited to
investigations or studies and for basic services with limited scope and
complexity.
5. Percent of Construction ("Percent")
Compensation shall be based upon 1) the "Harris County Curve for
Engineering Compensation" for basic and construction phase services;
and 2) reimbursement for direct nonsalary expenditures and subconsultant
contracts as defined in the scope of work for the project. The Engineer
shall provide a proposal that includes the estimated construction cost of
the project and the total fees for the project. If the actual low bid for
construction is 20% above or below the estimate, the engineering fees are
subject to equitable adjustment by mutual agreement of the Engineer and
City.
2
If City fails to make any payment due Engineer for services and expenses within
thirty (30) days after receipt and approval of Engineer's statement for services therefore,
the amounts due Engineer will be increased at the rate of one half percent (112%) per
month from said thirtieth (30th) day, and, in addition, Engineer may, after giving seven
(7) days' written notice to City, suspend services under this Contract until Engineer has
been paid in full, all amounts due for services, expenses, and charges.
B. All the Engineer's working drawings, plans, and specifications, if required under
this Contract, shall be sufficiently accurate, detailed, and complete so that competitive
bids for the work can be obtained and the improvements constructed.
C. Approval of the Engineer's work by the City shall not release the Engineer, its
employees, agents, or consultants, from the responsibility and liability for the accuracy
and competency of their designs, working drawings, and specifications, or other
documents and services.
D. Subject to Article 8 herein or as otherwise agreed, the Engineer shall promptly
correct errors in the Engineer's work, including errors discovered after final payment,
without receiving additional compensation.
E. Prior to execution of this agreement, the Engineer shall have prepared a project
schedule identified as an attachment to this agreement. The Project Schedule shall be
submitted in digital and paper form, in the Microsoft Project for Windows format. The
Project Schedule shall contain a complete schedule so that the Engineer's scope of
services under this contract can be accomplished within the specified time and contract
cost. The Project Schedule will provide specific work sequence and definite review
times by the City and the Engineer of the work performed. If the review time should
take longer than shown on the project schedule, through no fault of the Engineer,
additional contract time may be authorized by the City through a supplemental
agreement, if requested by a timely written request from the Engineer and approved by
the City.
3. Term and Termination. This Contract term will begin upon execution and end sixty
days after issuance of the certification of completion of construction by the Engineer.
The City may terminate this Contract at any time during its term by giving written notice
to Engineer. The City shall pay the Engineer for all services rendered to the date of
termination.
4. Modifications. City without invalidating the Contract, may order changes within the
general scope of the work required by the Contract by altering, adding to and/or
deducting from the work to be performed. If any change under this clause causes an
increase or decrease in Engineer's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of
any part of the Services under the Contract, an equitable adjustment will be made by
mutual agreement and the Contract modified in writing accordingly.
3
5. Subcontracts. If, for any reason, at any time during the progress of providing
services, City determines that any subcontractor for Engineer is incompetent or
undesirable, City will notify Engineer accordingly and Engineer shall take immediate
corrective action, which may include cancellation of such subcontract. Subletting by
subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in the
Contract shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and City.
6. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, report data, and other project information
developed in the execution of the services provided under this Contract shall be the
property of the City upon payment of Engineer's fees for services. Engineer may retain
copies for record purposes. Owner agrees such documents are not intended or
represented to be suitable for reuse by City or others. Any reuse by City or by those
who obtained said documents from City without written verification or adaptation by
Engineer will be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engineer, or
to Engineer's independent associates or consultants, and City shall indemnify and hold
harmless Engineer and Engineer's independent associates and consultants from all
claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or
resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle Engineer to further
reasonable compensation. Engineer may reuse all drawings, report data, and other
project information in the execution of the services provided under this Contract in
Engineer's other activities. Any reuse by Engineer will be at Engineer's sole risk and
without liability or legal exposure to City, and Engineer shall indemnify and hold
harmless City from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees
arising out of or resulting therefrom.
7. Insurance.
A. The Engineer shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons, damages to property, or any errors and
omissions relating to the performance of any work by the Engineer, its agents,
employees or subcontractors under this Agreement, as follows:
(1) Workers' Compensation as required by law.
(2) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 in
the aggregate.
(3) Comprehensive General Liability and Property Damage Insurance with
minimum limits of $1,000,000 for injury or death of anyone person,
$1,000,000 for each occurrence, and $1,000,000 for each occurrence of
damage to or destruction of property.
4
(4) Comprehensive Automobile and Truck Liability Insurance covering owned,
hired, and non-owned vehicles, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 for
injury or death of anyone person, $1,000,000 for each occurrence, and
$1,000,000 for property damage.
B. The Engineer shall include the City as an additional insured under the policies,
with the exception of the Professional Liability Insurance and Workers' Compensation.
Certificates of Insurance and endorsements shall be furnished to the City before work
commences. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to
the City. Upon request, certified copies of all insurance policies shall be furnished to the
City.
8. Indemnitv. Engineer shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents, and
employees, harmless from any claim, loss, damage, suit, and liability of every kind for
which Engineer is legally liable, including all expenses of litigation, court costs, and
attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person, for damage to any property, or
errors in design, any of which are caused by the negligent act or omission of the
Engineer, his officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors under this Contract.
9. Assiqnment. Engineer shall not assign this Contract without the prior written
consent of the City.
10. Law Governinq and Venue. This Contract shall be governed by the law of the State
of Texas and no lawsuit shall be prosecuted on this Contract except in a court of
competent jurisdiction located in Brazoria County, Texas.
11. Entire Contract. This Contract represents the entire Contract between the City and
the Engineer and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or contracts, either
written or oral. This Contract may be amended only by written instrument signed by
both parties. Purchase orders issued under this Agreement shall contain a statement
nullifying additional terms and conditions on the reverse side of the purchase order and
referencing this Agreement.
12. Conflicts in Contract Documents. The above provIsions shall govern over any
conflicting provision contained in any referenced contract document specified above.
13. Dispute Resolution Procedures. The Engineer and City desire an expeditious
means to resolve any disputes that may arise between them regarding this Contract. To
accomplish this, the parties agree to mediation as follows: If a dispute arises out of or
relates to this Contract, or the breach thereof, and if the dispute cannot be settled
through negotiation, then the parties agree first to try in good faith, and before bringing
any legal action, to settle the dispute by mediation of a third party who will be selected
by agreement of the parties.
5
EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the 23rd day of Januarv
, 20.QL.
CITY OF PEARLAND
ENGINEER
tff -lJ);
By: 1-:'
Printed Name; : ~...rr, i'E.
Title: ;:;'eI/'/~~f-
By: tiJlE->
Printed f'lame: Bi 11 Ei sen
Title: Ci tv Manaqer
STATEOFTE~ .
COUNTY OF~
~
~
~
() BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
U[l i {J r; i 5eJ1 , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes
and consideration therein expressed.
c=:?l GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS c13'cl DAY OF
U~ ,AD., 20 ~& .
~~l!dr1Y.L
NO ARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF TEXAS
Printed Name: ;Z,b'!1 E ~~
My Commission Expires: :s;j
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTYOF~
~
~
~
~ d J3.EFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
L.. cu.e /C'(.J'S f , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed.
?GIVEN UNDER MY HANg, AND SEAL OF. OFFICE THIS... ~ DAY OF
()/}it(()A(j/ ,AD., 20~. .,,'
/ '&Idm /
\ . '/7 rrfjJ~f,~ M J.
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF TEXAk"
,. _ '1 /
Printed Name: b' f) I::; If). t/1.DG,K-
My Commission Expires: 513 )"YSt.
I I
6
KK
I
KIRST KOSMOSKl, INC.
Civil/Consulting Engineers
2630 Fountainview, Ste. 318; Hou., Tx. 77057
November 10, 2005
City of Pearland
Projects Department
3519 Liberty Drive, 3rd F1.
Pearland, Texas 77581
KKI Project No.:
KKI Proposal No.:
Vendor No.:
CoP P.O. No.:
mOOO 1-020-100
mOOO 1-020-1 00
4747
Attn.: Mr. Joseph S. Wertz
Projects Director
Re.: City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling, Analysis, & Planning
Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
Gentlemen,
Kirst Kosmoski, Inc. (KKI) is pleased to present this scope of services and proposal for providing Professional
Engineering Services to the City of Pearland (City) for the referenced project. This proposal provides for a
complete hydraulic modeling for the wastewater infrastructure. The objectives of the modeling, analysis, and
planning efforts are to:
. Simulate the existing wastewater sewerage system,
. Analyze the current capacity of the existing system,
. Identify the operational problems,
. Verify infrastructure improvements projects and retirement for aging components, such as lift stations,
proposed in the 2030 - Wastewater Capital Improvement Program (CIP),
. Develop additional cost-effective improvement alternatives, and
. Provide the City with a comprehensive working model to be used for future system analysis & planning.
The proposed solutions will become part of the recommended 2030 - Wastewater CIP that will promote shared
costs for planned developments on the existing wastewater infrastructure for the rapidly growing Pearland
community. The scope of services for this project includes:
1. InfoWorks Hydraulic Model Construction involves a collection of various data sources from
different utility depmiments which houses information and data to be used in the model.
2. Capital Improvement Program Challenge considers the balance of maintaining day-to-day operations
for optimal customer service with the need to maintain, improve, rehabilitate, and plan for the future
of its increasingly stressed and aging infrastructure.
3. Hydraulic Model Calibration establishes an essential component to any useful, effective model. The
condition and level to which a model is calibrated is directly related to the degree of confidence to
which a management decision is made on that system.
4. Hydraulic Model Analysis will be performed to the extent to which the model has been calibrated
which considers the source and method of data input, the closeness to which model results match field
data, and the length oftime which the model has been calibrated.
5. KKI Experience will provide "Value-Added" services as an opportunity for our clients to add modeling
capabilities and "Will Call Updates" on an as-needed basis.
6. Utilities Coordination Mapping is our GIS mapping system to track each project within a utility's
service area using Microsoft Office, ESRI, and Info Works impOIi and export software modules.
November, 102005
City of Pearland
City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling, Analysis, & Planning
Page 2 of 5
KKI will work with the city's staffto develop a specific set of critelia, maintain data compatibility based on the
established design criteria, and perform engineering service necessary to provide a comprehensive assessment of
the Capital Improvement Program.
KKI will present the City of Pearl and with the opportunity to maintain its hydraulic model with the most recent
facility information available using the latest in techniques to improve the quantity and accuracy of input data
for the complete sewerage system. Therefore, KKI will improve the depth and breadth of decision-making,
accessibility to existing system information, and potential relationships with other departmental databases.
KKI will coordinate informational sources to potentially improve on the quantity and quality of data input to the
hydraulic model:
· Geographical Information System,
. Record Drawings,
· Aerial Photography and Ortho Rectification,
· Operation and Maintenance,
· Data gathering systems i.e. SCADNtelemetry systems,
· Water Customer Billing Database, and more
KKI will use the InfoWorks hydraulic model to upgrade the City's current system model by incorporating new
developments, infrastructure improvements, and up-to-date attribute data into the database to yield a current
functional and visual representation of your system. Reasons to update the current hydraulic model include:
· Gravity sewer and force main size analysis,
· Lift station rehabilitation & abandonment evaluation & scheduling,
· Delineation of service area boundaries for flow transfers,
· Evaluation of new or additional lift/pump stations,
. Adjusted valve settings,
· Additional storage facilities planning,
· Modified automated system controls,
· Analyze significant developments which place additional demand on existing system,
· Cost sharing with land developers,
· .. .and more
The wastewater modeling effort can be divided into four phases, as follows:
Phase 1 - Model Development, Flow Analysis, and Hydrograph Generation
Phase 2 - Build Service Area Models
Phase 3 - Define Capital Improvement Projects
Phase 4 - Deliverables and City Staff Training
Phase 1 - Model Development, Flow Analysis, and Hydrograph Generation
1. Investigate service area status. Review the status of area overflows, proposed capital improvement
and maintenance projects, state compliance, system adequacy and flow monitoring data. Conduct city
staff interviews to establish baseline service area status. Open channels of communications.
November, 102005
City of Pearl and
City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling, Analysis, & Planning
Page 3 of 5
2. Verify acreages. Develop wastewater basins for developed (sewer) and undeveloped acreages.
Wastewater basins will be defined as an area served by a lift station or key junction point within a
gravity system, such as a subdivision, connected to a trunk sewer. All City parcel shape files (over
40,000 elements) will be assigned to basins. Build GIS tools and maps to maintain new changes or
upgrades in land use.
3. Determine existing dry weather flows (DWF). Determine existing DWF using flow monitoring
records collected by City Operations. Use exiting flow monitoring data to establish average DWF and
associated diurnal flow profiles. In the absence of flow monitoring data, use existing water
consumption records to develop unit flows for the various land uses. Build GIS tools and maps to
maintain changes or upgrades to unit flow records.
4. Population projections and land development. Obtain population projections for each service area
and modify those projections based on planned and newly developed areas.
5. Determine future dry weather flows. Determine the DWF from future development for each
wastewater basin using current land use definitions.
6. Wastewater basin hydrographs. Each wastewater basin represents inflow to the InfoWorks model of
the entire service area sewerage network. As a general rule, wastewater basins should be delineated
based on the ease of flow monitoring locations such as lift stations or historically monitored meter sites.
7. Select flow monitoring site for each wastewater basin. Initial flow monitoring sites will be selected
based on city staff interviews to assist the development of the service area model. Additional sites will
be selected based on initial model results that define possible problem areas within the basin.
8. Develop RT&K's. The 7-day and Meter Shape Analysis Synthetic (MSAS) Excel Workbooks will be
used to analyze the existing flow data to determine representative wastewater basin hydro graphs (R, T,
and K's) characterizing land use types, i.e. residential, commercial, industrial, or instructional.
9. Develop existing inflow and infiltration (III) hydrographs. Using the MSAS Workbook, apply
wastewater basin hydrographs parameters (R, T, and K's) to generate a basin's design synthetic
hydro graph for TCEQ 2-year, 24-hour Design Storm event. The area (acreage) used should represent
the total sewered acreage for the wastewater basin which has been monitored.
10. Develop future III hydrograph. Determine the wastewater peak III flow for future development for
each basin by applying average water consumption rates by land use in gallons per day per acre
multiplied by 5 for peak VI hour.
11. Meter Analysis. Develop 2-year, 24hour synthetic hydro graphs for wastewater basins that have been
metered. Key steps include:
· Gather meter data and establish relationships to upstream hydro graphs,
· Verify consistency of flow monitoring data,
· Establish relationships with surrounding rain gauges,
· Select rain events that cover the range of storm duration and magnitude,
· Determine VI hydro graph shape characteristics, and
· Develop 2-year, 24-hour design hydrographs.
Phase 2 - Build Service Area Models
1. Material takeoffs. Review existing service area pipe networks for completeness. Complete pipe
network using existing record drawings.
2. InfoWorks network. Build the InfoWorks pipe network for all pipes within each service area.
November, 102005
City of Pearland
City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling, Analysis, & Planning
Page 4 of 5
3. Model calibration. When the computer model and flow analysis are complete, the service area model
can be calibrated. Calibrate hydraulic models to the service area wastewater treatment plants permanent
flow meter.
4. Meet with City staff. Meet with appropriate City personnel to review completeness of model and
discuss known problems.
5. Service Area Summary. Summarize the peak and average daily flows for hydro graph basins in a
Flow Calculation Workbook and GeoDatabase. Three scenarios will be evaluated for each service basin
as follows:
· Scenario A - Existing dry weather flow (DWF) plus wet weather flow (WWF),
· Scenario B - Current known developments DWF plus WWF, and
· Scenario C - Capital Improvement Project DWF plus WWF.
Phase 3 - Define Capital Improvement Projects
1. Run the Info Works model with existing flows. Run The InfoWorks model for Scenario A. Verify
model output based on model continuity, hydraulics, and location of overflows. Review the model
results to identify key hydraulic constrictions in the existing system and overflow locations.
2. Meet with the City staff. Meet with appropriate City personnel to discuss known problems such as
customer complaints, overflows, model accuracy, and proposed solutions. Discuss staff concerns with
current land developments within the service area and plans to service these developments.
3. Field survey. Perform a field reconnaissance of the service area to view first hand problem areas.
Look for features such as low points where a model overflows. Coordinate the reconnaissance with
City staff.
4. Revise models. Based on comments from the City and information gathered from field surveys revise
the service area model to reflect information about existing overflow conditions. Correlate overflow
events with causes relating to rainfall events or system repairs such as replacement of a level float at a
lift station. Calibrate model to overflow event.
5. Run model with design flows. Run the service area models for Scenario B - current development and
Scenario C - ultimate development. Generate service area maps showing locations of surcharged sewers
and potential overflows. Perforn1 sensitivity analysis on models to determine potential problem areas
where flows increase above design conditions.
6. Meet with the City staff. Meet with appropriate City personnel to discuss solutions.
7. Alternative Analysis. Prepare alternatives such as new sewers, lift station expansion, flow diversion,
lifts station abandonment, and downstream treatment expansion for the entire service area. Prepare cost
estimates to compare alternatives.
8. Flow Reduction. Consider flow reduction through sewer rehabilitation in wastewater basins indicating
high VI. Provide cost estimate.
9. Capital Improvement Project. Prepare a project description for the detailed design engineer. Discuss
the CIP project with the City staff and assign construction completion date. Place project into the
Capital Improvements Program.
November, 10 2005
City of Pearl and
City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling, Analysis, & Planning
Page 5 of 5
Phase 4 - Deliverables and City Staff Training
1. Deliverables:
. InfoWorks Hydraulic Model,
. Training of City Staff to Use and Maintain the Model,
. Shape and Analysis Flow Analysis,
. GIS Interface to GeoDatabases, and
. Project Descriptions.
KKI proposes to perform the tasks and provide the deliverables listed above as "Basic Services" for the Lump
Sum amount of $325,435. KKI anticipates it will take fifteen to eighteen months to complete this project. A
breakdown of the level of effort for the major tasks and their costs is attached.
"Additional Services" such as field surveying to resolve conflicts in the available system data and flow
monitoring beyond the City's current capabilities are not included in Basic Services but can be provided on Cost
Plus - NTE (Not to Exceed) bases if required and approved by the City. Further, KKI also offers "Value Added
Opportunities" to assist the City in working together with development community. These services would be
provided on "Time & Materials" Work Authorization bases per the attached rate schedule as requested and
approved by the City including, but not limited to:
. Modeling of future/proposed developer projects that appear to deviate from or modify the City's CIP,
. Software Training of Additional City Staff,
. Model Maintenance and Updating,
. In-House Hydraulic Model Expertise to QAlQC Project Submittals,
. Assistance with Development of Scopes, Schedules, and Budgets for Wastewater CIP Projects,
. Coordination with the Economic Development council, Planning & Zoning, and members of the
development community,
. Assistance with Proposal Reviews for determination of compliance with the Hydraulic Model Approach
and Understanding, and
. Model to GIS Integrations.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to the City and look forward to finalizing the agreement
and beginning work. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at 832-242-7200 or
832-465-0784.
Sincerely,
Eddie Kirst, P .E.
Principal
attch.
JMH/LEK/lek
C:\Documents and Settings\kirstle\My Documents\lek_ kki\mOOO] -CoP\020-cw ww mdlng\OO l-cop-wertz_ ww mdlng plng_] 1-] O-OS.doc
City of Pearl and
KKI Project No.: mOOOI-020-100
.
. . ..
., ...- ~" .....
K
K1
KIRST KOSMOSKI, INC.
CivtlConsu/lmg Engmeers
2630 FOllntamvtew, Ste 318: HOll, Tx. 77057 OPINION OF ENGINEERING COST
FOR
City Wide Wastewater System Hydraulic Modeling, Analysis, & Planning
TASK DESCRIPTION
Prin
TOTAL
TOTAL
COST
Basic Services LS:
10
10
10
10
150
ISO
ISO
100
300
300
300
100
600
600
600
200
150
150
20
20
20
20
1230 $ 98,752.50
1230 $ 98,752.50
1080 $ 90,502.50
430 $ 37,427.50
Form: 11/10/2005 Page 1 of 1
C:\Documents and Settings\kirstle\My Documents\lek._kki\m0001-CoP\020-cw ww mdlng\OOl-ww mdlng & plng_opln-of-engr-cost-11-10-05-2.xls
Originated: 11/0912005
Printed: 11/1012005
KK
I
KIRST KOSMOSKI, INc.
Civil/Consulting Engineers
2630 Fountainview, Ste. 318; Hou., Tx. 77057
RATE SCHEDULE
Effective: 01101/06
I Description I Billing Code I Rate I
Em!:ineerin2:
Principal II 02 $ 205.00
Proj. Mngr. / Sr. Eng. II 11 $ 126.00
Project Engineer II 21 $ 100.00
EIT / Designer II 31 $ 81.00
CADD Operator II 41 $ 60.00
Clerical II 51 $ 54.00
Reimbursable Expenses:
Delivery Service 60 Cost
Project Specific Supplies (ex. Film, Binders, Software...) 61 Cost
Meals / Entertainment 62 Cost
Transportation (Air/Ground Fare, Parking) 63 Cost
Lodging 64 Cost
Mileage / Parking 70 $ 0.375
In-house Repro. - Copies (8W' x 11") 71 $ 0.25
In-house Repro. - Copies (11" x 17") 72 $ 0.50
In-house Repro. - Copies/Prints (8Y2" x 14") 73 $ 0.32
In-house Repro. - B&W Plots (24" x 36") 74 $ 6.50
In-house Repro. - Color Plots (24" x 36") 75 $ 50.00
SubconsultantsN endors:
Survey; Topo, Right-of-Way, Boundary, etc. 80 Cost Plus 10%
Geotechnical Investigation & Design 81 Cost Plus 10%
Signal/Illumination Design 82 Cost Plus 10%
Drafting 83 Cost Plus 10%
Studies; Environmental, Traffic, Hydraulic... 84 Cost Plus 10%
Contract Services 85 Cost Plus 10%
Contract Services 86 Cost Plus 10%
Contract Services 87 Cost Plus 10%
Outside Reproduction - Copies (ex. Specs, Reports) 88 Cost Plus 10%
Outside Reproduction - BL's, Sepias, "TIFF's"... 89 Cost Plus 1 0%