Loading...
2010-07-29 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES CITY OF PEARLAND CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, HELD ON JULY 29, 2010 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE HUMAN RESOURCES CONFERENCE ROOM OF PEARLAND CITY HALL, 3519 LIBERTY DRIVE, PEARLAND TEXAS. Present Tom Hodges, Chairperson Bonita J. Hall Civil Service Director Phil Cessac, Vice Chairperson Cristen Wood, HR Generalist James Gilbert, Commissioner Police Captain Ron Fraser CALL TO ORDER. At 6:01 p.m. 2010-11 Discuss and Approve Minutes for the July 7, 2010 meeting. James Gilbert made a motion to accept the minutes as presented, and Phil Cessac seconded. MOTION CARRIED 2010-12 Discuss and Approve Minutes for the July 21, 2010 meeting. James Gilbert made a motion to accept the minutes as presented and Tom Hodges seconded. MOTION CARRIED 2010-13 Discuss and Consider Revisions to Section 143.022 of the City of Pearland Local Civil Service Rules. Bonita Hall updated the members on the process involving section 143.022 and applicant Carlson. There was discussion about the physicians’ offices not understanding the need for appellants to see the physician and not a physician’s assistant, nurse, etc. Tom Hodges asked if it were possible to create a pool/list of physicians for any future appeals. Bonita Hall and Captain Fraser indicated that the statute was silent on that question. Phil Cessac made a motion to accept the recommended changes to local rules section 143.022 with the provision of including the ability to create a standing Minutes Page2 list of physicians for future appeals and James Gilbert seconded. MOTION CARRIED 2010-14 Discuss and Consider Revisions to the City of Pearland Local Civil Service Rules. (Item Number 2010-07, Previously Tabled June 10, 2010.). Bonita Hall led the discussion of the proposed changes to various sections of the local rules. The Commission talked about much of the content up for consideration. The Commission specifically discussed whether or not to leave at 30 days the “notice of intent to test”; how the tie breakers should work for promotional tests; what type of tests, i.e. alcohol, drug, etc., should be run as part of the promotional process; the amount of accrued sick leave that may be paid when an employee leaves because of illness or injury; and whether or not to leave in the “Rules of Procedure”. The Commission spoke at length concerning the section on demotions and whether or not to include the current verbiage into the new rules. They sought Captain Fraser’s advice/opinion on the issue and there began a discussion about the employee being able at some point to go back to the position (temporary leave), how it should be defined and how long is “temporary”. There was lively discussion on how to protect both the officer and the City. Phil Cessac made a motion to approve the rules as discussed and amended and James Gilbert seconded. MOTION CARRIED The meeting was adjourned the meeting at 7:19 p.m. Approved on the ______ day of ________________, 2011. ______________________________ Tom Hodges, Chairperson ______________________________ Phil Cessac, Vice Chairperson ______________________________ James Gilbert, Commissioner