The URL can be used to link to this page

R2021-039 2021-03-22 RESOLUTION NO. R2021-39 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pearland, Texas, approving the Multi-Modal Master Plan as a planning tool to compliment and enhance the use of the City's Comprehensive Plan. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to set goals, objectives, policies, and criteria for Pearland's physical growth; and WHEREAS, the Multi-Model Master Plan is intended to serve as a planning tool for use of the Comprehensive Plan: Mobility Chapter, Goals 3.1 through 3.4 and Strategic Priority 3: Sidewalk Network Upgrades; and WHEREAS, the Multi-Model Master Plan is intended to serve as a planning tool for use of the Comprehensive Plan; Parks and Tourism Chapter, Goal 6.2, Trail Master Plan and Sidewalk Program; and WHEREAS, a public discussion was held with the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 2, 2020, to provide citizen update regarding the proposed plan; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS: Section I. That the City Council approves the Multi-Modal Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this the 22nd day of March 2021. EVIN COLE MAYOR AT T: CRY TAL ROAN, TRMC, CMC � .%:* CITY SECRETARY V` \�'• - CL et Pew: Jo! ,,,,,,,, „- DARRIN M. COKER CITY ATTORNEY LAI!Wit. rA - IVIU11.1-IVIUUCII r icti I - IIIai . * , . -• • • • ,, lit " ....ill.. ... .• .. •• v. t I • * .Ir. t 111111101 ''. ' so -. . .. •••', . • , ' .• .11‘Asb.1 t• ..40* ,.• , • , *, •• . •III' il - OW NO ilia .•. • . . le -•••••• . , •lle lelir• - '*illIllilliP •• 4if ' , 46 i : ,1 - gar... , ' . ..,.. „. . I •• • ' I Nt i ri • • • t . . 611:1r, ,,.. ' •*It:.- /.1. ...."' / . • li ..•tt k . . . „... s. -,, . . ... • , i; C. . . . e . 7 ..... i.„,. ._. 4. •-.444 wis 4- • .....aima ..... Immo. \fillir4 monot1/1=0"1.6 Wirilla I _- _It 0. •• li al II I I 111 C."' .i ik ie l* \AIMS r • IP _ _ . .-....._- ... .- .. . •NibiX41111 411 a ''s ... WO j .03 I' . -- .----'1,r. .. 0,--- ,..........,,„, .... • ,di-.I -.I ;....1•7--• • •ve. • -------- .11 I. I 1 a %.'IL 4i iii NIT VINT111111‘111 II- .., . ./of 'Nip ....••••••••"" Vb 4". t.. a eAP la 11411 ei .10..0111111Wr - Ilt or. ... 101. --...... • ' '"-- d11111116••• a- - •417.....---"NIRffi 1110 er-Ir ,. II _ ......_ ._ 11 ,•,,,. . .. ....., mini .. .... . .... 414,Nill s op ...... ..... _ , . , ..,. • • os ...... pi.4.. 24. MULTI-MODAL k., c AMDMASTER PLAN L.....,.;_..,_ .....tz......„11, January 11, 2021 _ .. . _ 4_ . ..., • it i t • I C. _tof___Ai . El 3 '; c, N Spectrum Blvd • Tom Bass gg ./� • ParkTrails Comrl x at Shadow " R a To Bass Tom Bass II Greek Ranch A Trail Shadow Creek " Clear CCmek Tom Bass III Nnred Road Ranch Nature Trail Clear Creek Gott Club Nature reserve Trail(West) 1: LiIv Park 2A t TC Ttawn P.n • . _.4 , TS 6cmardrw Brookside Rd Pearland Gad Club - � at Country Puce L2 Souk Trait ov4 Cr 7�,�.v. Park Trail a s ', Event Center .. Hughes Ranch Rd a o I , ` & Paradise - Cemetery �. *1.. � ' k = Houston A • L° .� .. C .ien1l Gable al �j rdens el ..,.� Shadow CmlFancn .r `}f r r Broadway Sl(FM 51 I. L / I U Broadway St iMna Pav AP 7 Y o;wH P.t v \,}r/ `�`.�. la4a al ' 1 e� x I ,�.I•myck 7 �7 ACC SouthGate "'t r'�b' ��'Ij HI Park Trail 1 Gil L I — r / . l I CR841 Ej Executive Summary As will be illustrated and discussed within this plan, based on a thorough analysis of the City's principal thoroughfares as well as the network of existing and proposed off-street recreational trails, a system of 10 ft.wide pedestrian facilities are proposed along key thoroughfares, to link key points of origin (i.e., residen- tial neighborhoods and subdivisions), with important destinations(i.e., schools, parks, commercial centers, other public institutional buildings). Based on functional classification and right-of-way width, a series of thoroughfare cross sections were proposed (refer to Figures 7A-D, on pages 45-46) to be included within Chapter 6, Roadway Design Criteria, of the City's Engineering Design Criteria Manual (December 2018). Map ES1, Proposed Sidewalks Phasing Program, illustrates the network of proposed sidewalks that pro- vide pedestrians with a connected, active transportation system to be constructed as principal thorough- fares are reconstructed, as illustrated in Map 15, Thoroughfare Reconstruction Phasing Plan (page 42). As with the Thoroughfare Reconstruction Plan, the Proposed Sidewalks Phasing Program is divided into yearly increments (0-5 years, 5-10 years, and 10-15 years) to construct the sidewalks in stages due to planned budgets and to limit the disruption in traffic. The labels lettered A-Z refer to Table 5A-C, Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs, for proposed sidewalk improvements (pages 53-58). ii CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Air Uk ii4ii i i "t'DT ii.iiiii . R.. South Pr 35 II TEXAS 1 I, ( C osi .:..;Hard Rd _ 1H;�"�ni na irlit h,�,,�.a�all. DPIm"� NrcF SaMx's , SL I 1p _ r% 6 like. s n ° �. zcm. a a Tawn Ditch -n0 A Trail o w Orange St ,1 Crime o c Hunter) E O.a.gF SI +r�s Zy chlinski Creexa �EF E% a Perk Trail J/ 0. cyamneSrr Corrigan-Woody(41 MI a caPrest Academy Park Trail ` a��° Clear Creek Calnvy Cmn 9 *Trail(East) , ��Nm�(r,au� ,S y Fare 4 W wainu!St :Activity Cant _ RSAOj . Bead le! A.ee,".L obra- . vamted I `oij i\eaxe� Pearland LrIte Centennial t YMCA /°°""' + League Fee RC Park Trail l - v�� J p' i. ,naP. o we� Edible 1 ¢e k'''' "° ruit Trail 1� C�c� Pa�rldc Tradk West Oa Mary'seer Independence �' .aa, 1 cre Trair(Central) curse _ e,m Park Trail y /, �'t.cnn Uzer•,. Aaron peak !%� ` .... Mamma"I Park y(� , Ma s Creek Delores Fenwick 1 Mary's Creek �e n vJ Trail(West) mop Nature Center __ =0 Farms C' Trail(East) y Cabo Cave . ,�]/A/�J. ter Pim Holbw O 4 y µ / Plire NOHOW Cypress Trails at ` �,( u.ryu'c,�'..e Park Trail Village ohn Hargrove i - 0 Park Trail Environmental o Caatemarr v i, Complex tb a,a V ' E.. • Sports ete Comrans plex— oakf111e Pearlend ®.. Q 11 Aaeher Recreation Center and Nalalonum WIWI!s Dr g `t F'mee:n , e0 g I Smart Crw�jce Moosa a Cncket t ium L MAP ES 1 - - Existing Sidewalks Phase 1(0-5 years;2020-2025) Existing 10-ft.wide Sidewalk Sidewalk both sides of road PROPOSED -Sidewalk on one side of road — Existing City Trails Phase II(5 10 years;2025-2030) SIDEWALKS Existing Subdivision Trails Sidewalk both sides of road PHASING — Existing County Trails Sidewalk on one side of road • Existing Trailheads Phase Ill(10-15 years;2030-2035) -Sidewalk both sides of road PROGRAM • Existing Bridges "—Sidewalk on one side of road ADOPTED January 11,2021 iii Table of Contents Planning Area 1 Map 1, Planning Area 2 Subdivisions, Municipal Districts and Planned Developments 3 Figure 1A, Subdivision Entrance with Median 3 Figure 1B, Subdivision Entrance without Median 3 Map 2, Subdivisions, Municipal Districts and Planned Developments 4 Principal Corridors 5 Map 3, Principal Corridors 6 Table 1A, Corridor Inventory, West to East Corridors 8 Table 1B, Corridor Inventory, North to South Corridors 10 Table 1 C, Corridor Inventory, Southwest to Northeast Corridors 12 Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way 13 Map 4, Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way 14 Existing Street Sections 15 Figure 2A, Minor Collector Section 15 Figure 2B, Major Collector Section 15 Figure 2C, Secondary Thoroughfare Section 16 Figure 2D, Major Thoroughfare Section 16 Average Annual Daily Traffic (2017) 17 Map 5,Average Annual Daily Traffic (2017) 18 Thoroughfare Level of Service (2015) 19 Map 6, Thoroughfare Levels of Service (2015) 20 • Pedestrian Accidents 21 Figure 3, Pedestrian Accident Hot Spot Example 21 Map 7, Pedestrian Accidents (2013-2019) 22 Bicycle Accidents (2013-2019) 23 Figure 4, Bicycle Accident Hot Spot Example 23 Map 8, Bicycle Accidents (2013-2019) 24 Vehicular Accidents (2014-2019) 25 Figure 5, Vehicular Accident Hot Spot Example at Broadway Street and Pearland Parkway 25 Map 9, Vehicular Accidents (2014-2019) 26 Neighborhood Analysis 27 Map 10, Neighborhood Analysis 28 Destination Analysis 29 Map 11, Destination Analysis 30 Sidewalks 31 Figure 6, Sidewalk Detail 31 Map 12, Sidewalks 32 Existing Trails 33 Table 3, Existing Trails 33 Map 13, Existing Trails 34 iv CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Future Thoroughfare Improvements 35 Map 14, Future Thoroughfare Improvements 36 Table 4A, Future Thoroughfare Improvements 38 Table 4B, Future Thoroughfare Improvements 40 Thoroughfare Reconstruction Phasing Plan 41 Map 15, Thoroughfare Reconstruction Phasing Plan 42 Proposed Street Sections 44 Figure 7A, Proposed Street Sections: 80 ft. R.O.W. Major Collector 45 Figure 7B, Proposed Street Sections: 100 ft. R.O.W. Secondary Thoroughfare 45 Figure 7C, Proposed Street Sections: 100 ft. R.O.W. Secondary Thoroughfare with Median 46 Figure 7D, Proposed Street Sections: 120 ft. R.O.W. Major Thoroughfare 46 Existing Sidewalk Analysis 47 Map 16, Existing Sidewalk Analysis 48 Proposed Sidewalk Phasing Program 49 Map 17, Sidewalk Phasing Program 50 Existing Trails and Proposed Sidewalks Interface 51 Map 18, Existing Trails and Sidewalk Phasing 52 Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs 53 Table 5A, West to East Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs 53-55 Table 5B, North to South Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs 56-57 Table 5C, Southwest to Northeast Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs 58 Sidewalk and Trail Construction 59 Figure 8A-C, Sidewalk and Trail Construction Detail and Illustratives Figure 8A, Construction Details 59 Figure 8B, Concrete Trail Illustrative 60 Figure 8C, Decomposed Granite Trail Illustrative 60 Proposed Trails 61 Table 6, Proposed Trails and Order of Magnitude Costs 61 Map 19, Proposed Trails and Trailheads 62 Table 7, Breakdown of Costs for Each Type of Proposed Trailhead 63 Table 8, Proposed Trailheads and Order of Magnitude Costs 64 Active Transportation Network: Existing and Proposed 65 Map 20, Active Transportation Network 66 Active Transportation Implementation Strategies and Recommendations _67 Appendix A A.1 Table A.1-16, Subdivision Entrance Inventory A.2-17 Appendix B, Pedestrian Level of Service B.1 Table B.1, Assessment Categories B.5 Table 8.2, Trail Conditions Assessment B.7 Map B.1, Existing Trails B.8 Tables B.3-20, Trail Order of Magnitude Costs B.10-46 Figures B.2-20, Trail Opportunities for Improvement B.10-46 Trail Conditions Assessment Sheets B.49-67 ADOPTED January 11,2021 v Planning Area Purpose The purpose and goal of this first phase of Pearland's Multi-Modal Master Plan is to develop an efficient, safe, and connected network of active transportation routes throughout the City of Pearland; linking points of origin (neighborhoods, subdivisions, municipal utility districts— MUDs, and planned residential develop- ments—PDs)to destinations(other residential areas, parks, schools, libraries,commercial areas,and plac- es of employment); by way of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities, including sidewalks and off-street recreational trails. These facilities are located within thoroughfare rights-of-way, and within utility corridor (drainage and transmission) easements and rights-of-way. The Multi-Modal Master Plan will incorporate proposed future trail alignments and implementation plans outlined within the 2007 Trail Master Plan and Sidewalk Program. This is the first phase of a multi-phased, Multi-Modal Master Plan, as subsequent phases will embrace other modes of transportation including public transit, and autonomous vehicles. 1 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN / ' 'lobby ",;Airport 11-4 521 8 MAP 1, . . PLANNING AREA s _ � `" • e"�� " January 11,202f R { ___I_ Brookside Village Kr.vp R, • - --'' k' f' elik ......, _.R., ,,,,,,,,, m ii) II. „_,_,___ R $ N r N ? v'1 jou t (, 1.:::; �_ 4r (' Air• , 1. i' \ 4 1 •/ 1 ` ;yO. s ■� n� / .; r .. . Ain+et Ln1 s s .. �1. rRd(CR r WI _ —__ M QP. ..�.. ..,a / a L l / , , J M 1 / endswood _ . . . —\` _ ..a LEGEND n City Limits Q ETJ `---'� Schools Parks and Open Space ^� 0 2,500 5.000 feet; Creeks/Bayous City Data:http//gis.pearlandtx.gov/web/',Additional Data Tx DOT,rB''' Braz, oria County,and H-GAC.and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com O 0 Water Bodies • Subdivisions, Municipal Districts, and Planned Developments Context For the purposes of this planning program,points of origin include existing neighborhoods and subdivi- sions,municipal utility districts(MUDS),and planned developments(PDs);which currently make-up an area of 28 square miles,as are depicted on Map 2,Residential Areas. The following types of residential development can be found within the City of Pearland: — MUD(Municipal Utility District).A political subdivision of the State of Texas authorized by the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality(TCEQ)to provide water,sewage,drainage and other utility-re- lated services within the MUD boundaries. — Subdivision.A parcel of land divided from a larger area for the purposes of independent development, typically as single-family residential tracts. — PD(Planned Development).Areas that have modified zoning without variances to tailor the specific needs of a project plan and the unique characteristics of a site. Additionally,when combined,MUD/Subdivision,PD/MUD,PD/Subdivision,and PD/MUD/Subdivision cate- gories compose the remainder of the residential subdivisions in Pearland. This analysis focuses on the connection of municipal pedestrian circulation facilities to the entrance of a residential subdivision and does not include review of pedestrian circulation facilities within the subdivision. Figure 1A,Subdivision Entrance with Median,and Figure 1B,Subdivision Entrance without Medi- an,illustrate proposed pedestrian safety improvements at subdivision entries,with and without medians, including wide sidewalks along the principal thoroughfare,vehicular signage locations and marked cross- walks with curb cuts and ramps. Figure IA, Figure 1B, Subdivision Entrance with Median Subdivision Entrance without Median citemr4 . A A A A A A i i ► t i i i 3 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN ..., . .:,..... _ - .._ .-.Hobby Houston .., ,;Airport - .. 121 MAP 2, le: RESIDENTIAL AREAS , ...:; - , ..,. - January 11.2021 ,, / , ..14. '''''' _ isitt%ssoles/j . ., . 11111111ah—rpt., corrINC*111.1111_, ., 1 Broc•kside Village ..,.....".' ... . , . - -_ •......• - - . ... . , / r a / IMI 1.1 ,..-- ,,,,4 ., 4,' ...., / timplitR, . tr,,.... . r '''..I. - „., ",..1-., 44i,Y- ; ' 9 IMP rt m ,,,f . , . . ... . . b'.:4 1111 II .. ''',40-\ •, . / . , ...., -------.... !!rill le ..F ,.,.. . PM''.4.14. • ''&. ... '',' . ri___I _Cr: . 0 .9 '',..'•‘ g i / N•::: . .. - / . ,; •' .. . , L J• , dendswood . ..-.. -----, \7- --,.... / NI . . . . ., LEGEND .. ..: '-------..„ MI MUD -----,......._,. Subdivision ----- I I= PD -..., MUD/Subdivision ..., O 0 2,500 5.000 feet:-, 1111 PD/MUD City Data http://gis.peadandtz.gov/webr,Additional Data'TxDOTEf:AA Brazorla County.and H-GAC:and Aerial imagery www.nearmap.com tiCZNOMM. ' PD/Subdivision '-----..------„.... PD/MUD/Subdivision , Principal Corridors Purpose Several principal thoroughfares were identified, and their corresponding rights-of-way were evaluated, based on multiple criteria,to determine the feasibility of retrofitting active transportation facilities within each thoroughfare's right-of-way. Criteria for the selection of corridors include: 1. Thoroughfares which connected the greatest number of subdivision entrances(points of origin)to the • most popular destinations. 2. Rights-of-way widths of no less than 80 feet(Minor Collector)for inclusion of eight and 10-foot wide sidewalks without impeding standard vehicular drive lanes. 3. Thoroughfares which span the length and width of the city,which would provide for a continuous pe- destrian pathway. 4. Thoroughfares that do not have high speed limits or large volumes of vehicular traffic that presents a safety hazard for pedestrians(i.e.,Broadway Street).Further analysis of traffic volumes will be explored in Map 5,Annual Average Daily Traffic(2017),page 18. Map 3,Principal Corridors,depicts the corridors which compose the study area.Corridors are divided into three categories by directions of travel:West to East Corridors,North to South Corridors and Southwest to Northeast Corridors.On page 7,the list of Principal Corridors shows corridor lengths in approximate linear miles,and Tables 1A-C,Corridor Inventory(pages 8,10,and 12),details thoroughfare type,rights- of-way lengths,level of service(LOS)grade,number of travel lanes,speed limits,etc. Results Corridor analysis selection criteria No.2 and No.3 eliminates local and residential corridors as their rights- of-way are narrower than 80 feet and the corridors are confined within their respective neighborhoods. Selection criterion No.4 eliminates thoroughfares such as Beltway 8,SH 288,SH 35 and Broadway Street. 5 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Hobby Airport . L?.f B. MAP 3, a PRINCIPAL CORRIDORS . El J... ,,I I.2021 .. -• 'l Spect,Blvd 4 j 1 1-' -•-- . I 5 1 I Brookside Village 'ti • 'tA"..":.-.1'O f fe,•/'a!uft r; .,.7 E LT-H=' , . ,-, 'Pr. #T..1 i I! i1q:- i--,--F;-.--i[,'Mi.''' It"4-, - `& , wme+a..,.Rd P i t F 24 w P'.. lk 111.,,. 1uc3H'e4rd.-'RI . f.. Ib 5pe ..Po �� e C 11 .. �, `wartit;t �1 7 r i i Bmad.a s �' 2 y t41 2 1 miena; - A r.eaa r��eed i s 6 �a 26 40' 0, •' - _ 20 25 s,a+ /62.., ' ■ , m _ lidtcas3t �� —WM if .. 1 '''''''''" R I :. . -. ,r, %'''- ..:::: tzt i\ 274,, / a I 14 ;\ / ,' /: y wa�ama t>. 35 cz, %T 0*45 \ •••••**.. / al �— I . <_.... ,.I I � Friendswood Maaxge OY FWd Rd -. „�� `�, '.�,; LEGEND Manvel .. „,.;,.,;, - Thoroughfares: �\ West to East Corridors Y,. `- North to South Corridors \\ O Southwest to Northeast Corridors 0 2.500 5.000 teat City Data:http//gis.pearlandtx.gov/web/,Additional Data:TxDOT,FEM}Cfirazoria County,and H-GAC;and Aenal imagery www.nearmap.com 0 "'` As depicted on Map 3,Principal Corridors on page 6,the principal corridors traversing the City of Pearland,from west to east,then north to south,and southwest to northeast beginning on the northwest side of the City,include: Approximate West to East Corridors Linear Miles 1 Shadow Creek Parkway—McHard Road—Brookside Road—McHard Road,to Pearland Parkway 9.8 2 Broadway Street(FM 518),to the City of Friendswood City Limits 13.8 3 Trammel-Fresno Rd/Southfork Drive/Magnolia Road(CR 59)to Peadand Parkway/John Lizer Road 11.1 4 Hughes Ranch Road to Reid Road 3.0 5 Orange Drive to Peadand Parkway 2.8 6 Fite Road to Veterans Drive(CR 143) 3.9 7 Pomona Parkway I Bailey Road(CR 101)/Oiler Drive to Pearland Parkway 8.6 8 McKeever Rd 3.4 North to South Corridors 9 FM 521 6.6 10 From Sam Houston Tollway(City Limits):Almeda School Road-Kingsley Drive-Airline Road South,to east 6.8 Dallas Road(City Limits) 11 From Sam Houston Tollway(City Limits):Kirby Drive to Pomona Parkway(in ETJ) 4.8 12 From Shadow Creek Parkway:Business Center Drive/Southfork Parkway to Kirby Drive 3.7 13 From Broadway Street(FM 518):Smith Ranch Road(FM 94)to Bailey Road(CR 101) 2.1 14 From Broadway Street(FM 518):Silverlake Parkway/CR 90 to Bailey Road(CR 101) 1.9 15 From Sam Houston Tollway(City Limits):Cullen Parkway(FM 865)/Cullen Parkway(CR 89)/Old Choco- 3.8 late Bayou Road to Bailey Road(CR 101)(City Limits) 16 From Brookside Road(City Limits):Reid Road/Manvel Road to Bailey Road(CR 101) 3.9 17 From Brookside Road(City Limits):O'Day Road/Harkey Road to Bailey Road(CR 101) 3.9 18 From Broadway Street(FM 518):McLean Road to Bailey Road(CR 101) 2.0 19 From Sam Houston Tollway(City Limits):Mykawa Road to Broadway Street(FM 518) 2.4 20 From W.Walnut Street:Veterans Drive(CR 143)to Bailey Road(CR 101) 2.0 21 From Sam Houston Tollway(City Limits):SH 35 to Hastings Cannon Rd 7.3 22 From Knapp Road:Old Alvin Road to Magnolia Road(CR 59)/John Lizer Road 3.1 23 From Sam Houston Tollway(City Limits):Pearland Parkway to Dixie Farm Road 5.5 Southwest to Northeast Corridors 24 From Broadway Street(FM 518):Barry Rose Road/Hughes Road to the City Limits 2.0 25 From Peadand Parkway:John Lizer Road to Liberty Road/Country Club Road to City Limits 3.1 26 From Broadway Street(FM 518):Yost Boulevard/Scarsdale Boulevard to City limits 2.0 27 From State Highway 35:Dixie Farm Road to City limits 4.1 For more information about each thoroughfare,refer to Table 1A-C,Corridor Inventory,on the following pages. 7 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 1A,Corridor Inventory West to East Corridors Name Type' ROW* Curb to LOS'e Travel Lanes Speed Limit Average Pedestrian Bicycle Vehicular Neighborhood Sidewalk Sidewalk Existing Conditions Curb (mph) Daily Accident Accident Accident Access Width Traffic'" Data' Data' Data' UShadow Creek Major 120' D 4 lanes divided,w/shoulder 45,50 36,737 7 1 747 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,concrete road,landscaped Pkwy-McHard Rd- Thoroughfare medians and sidewalks present at residential and Brookside Rd commercial areas ©Broadway St(FM Major 120' A-C,F,D 4 lanes divided,w/shoulder 40,45 29,847 28 11 3,325 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,concrete road,landscaped 518) Thoroughfare medians and sidewalks present at residential and commercial areas ©E Dallas Rd-CR Secondary 100' D 2 lanes undivided at Trammel-Fresno 35,40 Not 0 0 54 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,asphalt road.bar ditches 59-Southfork Thoroughfare Rd;4 lanes divided east of Kirby Dr at Available present,overhead electric lines on E Dallas Rd and Dr-Magnolia Rd Magnolia Pkwy.2 lanes undivided at Magnolia Pkwy.Concrete road and landscaped medians (CR 59)-John John Lizer Rd east of Kirby Dr on Magnolia Pkwy and sidewalks present Lizer Rd at residential and commercial areas UHughes Ranch Secondary 100',80' E.A-C 2 lanes undivided 35 Not 3 2 66 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersection only at Cullen Blvd,concrete road, Road Thoroughfare, Available bar ditches present,overhead electric lines and sidewalks Major present at residential areas Collector ©W Orange St-E Major 80',60' Not 2 lanes undivided 35 Not 1 1 23 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,concrete road.Asphalt road east Orange St Collector: Available Available of Old Alvin Rd.then concrete east of Scheider Dr Minor Collector 6 Fite Rd Major 80' Not 2 lanes undivided;4 lanes divided 35 Not 2 0 39 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersection at Cullen Pkwy and Manvel Collector Available between Manvel Rd until Keithwood Available Rd,asphalt road from Navarro Rd to McLean Rd then Dr.Then 2 lanes asphalt until Mclean concrete road to Veterans Dr.sidewalk present at Rd,then 4 lanes concrete until residential and commercial areas Veterans Dr IllPomona Pkwy Major 120' D 4 lanes divided,w/out shoulder.2 35,40 Not 0 0 166 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,concrete road,landscaped -Bailey Rd(CR Thoroughfare lanes undivided east of Hooks Rd Available medians,sidewalk present at residential and commercial 101)-Oiler Dr (Hwy 90) areas and bar ditches east of Hooks Rd(Hwy90) ['McKeever Rd (CR 100) Street Type and W,dth from Cory of Peertand Thoroughfare Plan(Approved 02/26/2018) -Cry of Peadand Overland Traffic Management Plan,Technical Memorandum e3'Assessment of Transportation System.July 2015,by CDM smith '-'Tr0OT 2012 Page left blank intentionally 9 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 1B,Corridor Inventory • North to South Corridors Name Type* ROW Roadway LOS" Travel Lanes Speed Limit Average Pedestrian Bicycle Vehicular Neighborhood Sidewalk Sidewalk Existing Conditions Width (mph) Daily Accident Accident Accident Access Width Traffic`'' Data` Data Data' 9 FM 521 10 Almeda School Major 120' A-C 2 lanes undivided(Almeda School 45 13,638 0 1 53 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,Concrete road,landscaped Rd-Kingsley Dr Thoroughfare/ Rd);4 lanes divided south of Clear medians,sidewalk present at residential and commercial -CR 48-Airline Secondary Creek(Kingsley Dr) areas,bar ditches only along Almeda School Rd Rd S Thoroughfare • mKirby Dr Major 120', D,A-C 4 lanes divided 45 Not 4 3 113 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,Concrete road,landscaped Thoroughfare/ 100' Available medians and sidewalks present at residential and Secondary commercial areas Thoroughfare ®Business Center Secondary 100' A-C,D 4 lanes divided(Business Center Dr), 35 Not 3 0 383 Yes Yes 6',8'sidewalk Signalized intersections,Concrete road,landscaped Dr-Southfork Thoroughfare 2 lanes undivided(Southfork Pkwy) Available at Pearland medians and sidewalks present at residential and Pkwy Town Center commercial areas ®Smith Ranch Rd Secondary 100',60' A-C,E 4 lanes divided until Southwyck Pkwy, 35 Not 1 0 24 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,Concrete road,landscaped (FM 94) Thoroughfare, then 2 lanes undivided until Magnolia Available medians and sidewalks present at residential and Minor Pkwy,then 4 lanes undivided commercial areas Collector mSilverlake Pkwy Secondary 100',80' A-C 4 lanes divided Not Not 0 0 8 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,Concrete road,landscaped (CR 90) Thoroughfare, Available Available medians and sidewalks present at residential and Major commercial areas Collector ®Cullen Pkwy(FM Major 120', E.F,A-C 4 lanes divided;2 lanes undivided at 35,45 20.637 2 4 319 Yes Yes 7'adjacent Signalized intersections,Concrete road(Cullen), 865)-Cullen Thoroughfare/ 100' Old Chocolate Bayou Rd to street from asphalt road(Old Chocolate Bayou Rd),concrete Pkwy(CR 89)- Secondary Sam Houston medians between Sam Houston Tollway and McHard Old Chocolate Thoroughfare Tollway to Rd,landscap ed medians south of McHard Rd,sidewalk Bayou Rd Broadway St; present at residential and commercial areas and bar 10'between ditches along Old Chocolate Bayou Rd Kilnar and Freedom Dr 16 Reid Rd-Manvel Major 120',60' A-C 2 lanes undivided 40,50 9,739 1 1 109 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,concrete road and bar ditches Rd Thoroughfare, along road Minor Collector m O'Day Rd- Secondary 100' A-C,E 2 lanes undivided 35,40 Not 1 0 50 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,asphalt road and bar ditches Harkey Rd Thoroughfare Available along road 18 McLean Rd Major 80' Not 2 lanes undivided 35 Not 0 2 62 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,concrete road,power lines and Collector Available Available bar ditches along road ®Mykawa Rd Secondary 100' E,F 2 lanes undivided 40,45 Not 3 2 106 Yes Yes 6'at Pipe$ Signalized intersections,asphalt road,power lines and Thoroughfare Available Tube Supplies, bar ditches along road Allied Fire ' Protection and Independent Bank 20 Veterans Dr(CR Secondary 100' D 2 lanes undivided 40 Not 1 0 67 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersection at Magnolia Pkwy,asphalt road, 143) Thoroughfare Available sidewalks present at residential and commercial areas, power lines and bar ditches along road ®SH 35(Main St) ®Old Alvin Rd Major 80',60' Not 2 lanes undivided 35,40 Not 0 1 47 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersection at McHard Rd and E Broadway Collector. Available Available St,asphalt road,sidewalks present at residential and Minor commercial areas,power lines and bar ditches along road Collector ®Pearland Pkwy Major 120' E,F 4 lanes divided 40,50 Not 0 2 541 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersections,landscaped medians,concrete Thoroughfare Available road,sidewalks present at residential and commercial areas,traffic circle at McHard Rd Street Type and Width from City of Pearland Thoroughfare Plan(Approved 02/26'2018) •Cry of Pearland ••Peadand Traffic Management Plan.Technical Memorandum s3.Assessment of Transportation System.July 2015,by COM Smith '•'TYOOT 2017 Page left blank intentionally 11 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table IC,Corridor Inventory Southwest to Northeast Corridors Name Typo ROW' Curb to LOS" Travel Lanes Speed Limit Average Pedestrian Bicycle Vehicular Neighborhood Sidewalk Sidewalk Existing Conditions Curb (mph) Daily Accident Accident Accident Access Width Traffic"' Data Data' Data' m Barry Rose Rd- Secondary 100' A-C 4 lanes divided at Barry Rose Rd,2 35 Not 0 1 30 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersection at E Broadway St and Pearland Hughes Rd Thoroughfare lanes undivided at Hughes Rd Available Pkwy,landscaped medians,concrete road,power poles along road ®John Lizer Rd Secondary 100',80' Not 2 lanes undivided,4 lanes undivided 35 Not 0 0 0 Yes Yes 5' Signalized intersection at Peadand Pkwy and E -Liberty Rd- Thoroughfare, Available at Liberty Dr north of Shady Bend Dr Available Broadway St,sidewalks present at residential and Country Club Rd Major commercial areas,power poles cross roads,bar ditches Collector along road 26 Yost Blvd- Secondary 100', D 4 lanes divided 35 Not 1 0 22 Yes Yes 6' Signalized intersection at E Broadway St,concrete road, Scarsdale Blvd Thoroughfare, 120' Available landscaped median,sidewalks present at residential and Major commercial areas,power poles along road Thoroughfare ®Dixie Farm Rd Major 120' E 4 lanes divided 40,45 Not 3 2 268 Yes Yes 6'adjacent to Signalized intersection at SH 35,Westfield Ln,E Thoroughfare Available road Broadway St,McGinnis Dr and McDonald Dr,concrete road,landscaped median,sidewalks present at residential and commercial areas,power poles along road Street Type and Width from City of Pearland Thoroughfare Plan(Approved 02I26/20181 •City or Pearland Peadand Traffic Management Plan,Technical Memorandum#3.Assessment of Transportation System,July 2015,by COM Smith •••TxDOT 2017 Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way Purpose To further determine the capacity of existing vehicular corridors to support active transportation facility im- provements,principally sidewalks and recreational trails,thoroughfare rights-of-way widths were identified and mapped,as depicted in Map 4, Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way.Proposed thoroughfare expansions, grade separations,and right-of-way acquisitions have also been identified and included.Existing signalized intersections were also included.As identified on the City of Pearland's Thoroughfare Plan(2018)right-of- way(ROW)widths equate with a thoroughfare's functional classification,as follows: — 120 foot wide minimum ROW:Major Thoroughfares — 100 foot wide minimum ROW:Secondary Thoroughfares — 80 foot wide minimum ROW:Major Collector Streets — 60 foot wide minimum ROW:Minor Collector Streets As summarized in Pearland's 2015 Traffic Management Plan(TMP),while functional class defines a thoroughfare's characteristics as well as its purpose and the relationship with other roadways in a region,it remains somewhat of a subjective measure,and may change over time as traffic patterns change with new development.Generally,roadways of higher functional class are designed to accentuate mobility over ac- cessibility,while roadways of a lower functional class focus on providing accessibility and may,for example, have more driveways to the abutting land(page 5 of 2015 TMP). — Major Thoroughfares primarily function to provide regional mobility,but also serve to provide access to adjacent properties.This functional class typically serves 10,000 to 30,000 vehicles per day.Major thoroughfares in Pearland include Broadway Street(FM 518),Main Street(SH 35),Bailey Road(CR 101),Dixie Farm Road,Almeda Road(FM 521),and the Pearland Parkway(refer to Figure 2D,Major Thoroughfare Section). — Secondary Thoroughfares typically serve 5,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day.Examples of secondary thoroughfares in Pearland include Kirby Drive,Southfork Road,Magnolia Road(CR 59),Harkey Road, and Veterans Drive(CR 143)(refer to Figure 2C,Secondary Thoroughfare Section). — Major Collector Streets typically serve 1,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day.Collector streets provide a larger degree of access to homes and to destinations other than thoroughfares.Stone Road,Walnut Street,Fite Road,and a portion of Orange Street are examples of major collectors(refer to Figure 2B, Major Collector Section). — Minor Collector Streets typically serve less than 2,000 vehicles per day.Minor collector streets in Pearland include North Fork Drive,Clear Lake Loop,and a portion of Orange Street(page 6 of 2015 TMP)(refer to Figure 2A,Minor Collector Section). In addition to rights-of-way widths,Figures 2A-D illustrate proposed widths and locations of drive lanes, landscape buffers and pedestrian sidewalks. For additional information,refer to Tables 1A-C,Corridor Inventory on pages 8,10 and 12. 13 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Houston Hobby+'Airport f MAP 4, €3 . . Freeway , ® '.e' THOROUGHFARE RIGHTS—OF-WAY . _ „_ i.-<�=.A. __ 1!1 IT1121 ..,. i \ Br. £ - ' age�L_r,_ T" r- .!�'� k i 80' 2 e-ip , 111 ‘It''''?, - -/4 A ......ti tII. , • 4, 21`36 •..•••.5.7.4, '•. ,./ tt.6.10 . jo ioo, ' 9 • . -Y III ENO.Rd �• LioximpHrrirtri, - Y i i L_.J •. , B ♦♦* • I „..,,, „,.,,, / i , t �. •' �♦ I i ♦• qt,V • " - _ riendswood a -/ . EJ i LEGEND miss.80'ROW Freeways 80'ROW To Be Widened ` �. 7.E, — 120'ROW —80'ROW Proposed \, 120'ROW To Be WidenedMI 60'ROW - —120'ROW Proposed •••60'ROW To Be Widened O 0 2,500 5,000 feet — —60'ROW Proposed City Data:http://gis.peadandtx.gov/web/,Addition: .ta:TxDOT 4,B\razoria County,and H-GAC.and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com 0 100'ROW ■■II100'ROW To Be Widened • Traffic Signal Locations ` - —100'ROW Proposed Proposed Grade Separation Existing Street Sections Figure 2A,Minor Collector,Section MINOR COLLECTOR 12-or 3-Lane Undrwded C 3 G Roadway) { fJ 2 5' 4 5' 12' 12' 12' 45 5' TYPICAL LANE CENTER LANE TYPICAL i F 37'ROADWAY 60' ROW Figure 2B,Major Collector,Section MAJOR COLLECTOR 14-Lane Undmtled C A G Roadway) • lr 2' 6' 75' 12' 12 12' 12' 75 o -2' TYPICAL LANE LANE LANE LANE TYPICAL 80' ROW 15 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Figure 2C, Secondary Thoroughfare, Section SECONDARY THOROUGHFARE (4-iane Unnded C 8 G Roadway) f a � * • 2' 6' 8 12 12 18 12 12 8 6 2 RLANE LANE MEDIAN LANE LANE TYPICAL 4 7 ROADWAY 37'ROADWAY - 100' ROW Figure 2D, Major Thoroughfare, Section MAJOR THOROUGHFARE (6-Lane Divided C 8 G Roadway) mom a ♦ * • 2' 6 6 12 12 12' 18' 12 12 12' 6' • 6' • 2' o v LANE LANE LANE MEDIAN LANE LANE LANE rn C) C) r x � 37 ROADWAY 37'ROADWAY 120' ROW MAJOR THOROUGHFARE (4-Lone Divided C 8 G Roadway) a ♦ • • 2 6 6 12 11 ---- 12 1. 4 t • 2 512 LANE LAN: MEDIAN LANE LANE v b F _ n 'C x 24'ROADW':•` 37'ROADWAY 120' ROW _ ADOPTED January 11,2021 16 Annual Average Daily Traffic (2017) Purpose Map 5, Annual Average Daily Traffic (2017) depicts TxDOT traffic counts on Pearland's principal corri- dors.The lowest count total ranges from less than 17,000 vehicular trips to the highest at 154,000 vehicular trips.Analysis of this map will determine locations for safe pedestrian routes. Findings The highest traffic volume occurs along principal highways,as FM 288 and Beltway 8 have between 42,000 to 154,000 annual average daily trips.These traffic counts are a result of heavy vehicular traffic flow across Pearland and is not restricted to its residents. With the exception of the intersection at FM 288 and Broad- way Street(FM 518), Pearland varies between 17,000 and 42,000 annual average daily trips(AADT).Traf- fic primarily flows in the north to south direction with the exception of Broadway Street, as it is the central - west to east corridor, providing retail and commercial destinations with a total average daily trip count of 30,650 trips.Another exception is Shadow Creek Parkway, between FM 521 and FM 288, as the average daily trip count is 31,873 trips; the high trip count can be can be attributed to the traffic flow generated by residents of Shadow Creek Ranch. The remaining lower traffic counts are evenly dispersed throughout Pearland. Results As noted above, thoroughfares with the lower traffic flow will provide the safer pedestrian routes. On the other hand, measures need to be introduced to thoroughfares with higher traffic flows to ensure pedestrian safety. 17 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN /l, MAP 5, ``• Beltway .5, ANNUAL AVERAGE b n 70,078 Atm DAILY TRAFFIC (2017) B y ., , .• �_ a� �� • "p January 11,2021 288 between ry / I Shad Shadow Creek Shadow Creek?- ' 1 ` ,' —— y L o ` - t •t Pkwyand i — J •• ;w� ., FM 521 ! » 13,995122.. r j 10,104410 ,«i�� • • . y� 1 17 099 alie10.t36 • 92.2t1 ,...,..ri i r lit 1' 1 .iy • i , um 6.3 I-- :.,_801 j_ 10,217 i :7.— • r gt1 l" 11 1111-f- dway St '. S hlam St \ and ' and . •� ,, Cullen Blvd Broadway St -•i*F '.2344-f'' MIS r...,, V 40,'08.1 1.$ ' .0 ......e: I ,� — - I I I W . r Broadway St 288 between Vi s 1•.; 1 ��____ ,_ 96,632 1 ,13067 1j!! j19noa .:�: ■ f `� t 11,845^ d `.f•. ... .� Y� — s / 4.• - r� „� �t . \•:* i 71,....7.16: i' :•14t6,126: -, , --- —awe. . . — . T.\ r 3' V, 46, '0,... , •.*- • �� ii k' •� .••„:4 • McKee.Rd RAM r .. ....tan j0r� LEGEND TxDOT Annual Average Daily ..� Traffic(2017) EMI 120'ROW 0 <17,000 mmim 100'ROW 17,000-42,000 0 — — 0 CityData:htt //is. 0 2,500 5.000 feet 80'ROW p:g peadandtx.gov/web/;Addition. .ta:TxDOT KE1MA Brazoria, County,and H-GAC:and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com 0 42,000-85,000 ``,�\'^.`\' +•60'ROW 0 85,000-154,000 Thoroughfare Level of Service (2015) Purpose As summarized in Pearland's 2015 Traffic Management Plan(TMP),level of service(LOS)measures the quality of traffic flow,based on volume,design speed,and capacity.It is a qualitative measure ranging from A to F,which characterizes both operational conditions within a traffic stream and highway users'percep- tion.Transportation planners derive LOS for a roadway by examining its traffic volume and the operating capacity(the number of vehicles per hour the roadway can accommodate without creating congestion). LOS measures are defined as follows: 1111 A(Excellent)Very low vehicle delays,free traffic flow,signal progression extremely favorable,with most vehicles arriving during given signal phase. - B(Good)Good traffic flow,good signal progression,more vehicles stop and experience higher delays than for LOS A. - C(Average)Stable traffic flow,fair signal progression,significant number of vehicles stop at signals. D(Acceptable)Noticeable traffic congestion,longer delays and unfavorable signal progression, many vehicles stop at signals. dim E(Congested) Unstable traffic flow,poor signal progression, significant congestion,traffic near roadway capacity,frequent traffic signal cycle failures. F(Poor)Unacceptable delay,extremely unstable flow,heavy congestion,traffic exceeds roadway capacity,stop-and-go conditions(page 16 of 2015 TMP). Findings As depicted in Map 6,Thoroughfare Level of Service(2015),while the volume to capacity ratio on several of Pearland's north-south thoroughfares in the western portions of the City receive a LOS rating from A to C(i.e.,Almeda School Road/Kingsley Drive,much of Kirby Drive;Reid Road,O'Day Road,etc.);most of the north-south thoroughfares in the eastern portion of the City receive LOS ratings of D through F.Likewise with most of the west-east thoroughfares in the City.Hence the roadway expansion program that is depict- ed in Map 14,Future Thoroughfare Improvements. Results As the street that spans the entire city from west to east,Broadway Street is the likely thoroughfare to be used by vehicles to traversing the breadth of the city.An analysis of Map 5,Annual Average Daily Traffic and Map 6,Thoroughfare Level of Service,indicates low traffic volumes coupled with an LOS rating of D and F infers that there is congestion caused by factors other than traffic volume,including access manage- ment-related issues resulting from the presence of retail and commercial establishments.Alternative west to east routes also show low LOS ratings. 19 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN / . MAP 6, "I:' THOROUGHFARE LEVEL OF SERVICE (2015) January 11,2021 t l ) •---, m, ' .410r..-‘ N)11( t 21 C �_ I 516 7 rJ � L,rw d 1 / / 'A,,,,,,, ''''',rqrf 04 if.!".11,•'.7 LJ w, fj I as r A00. ':,,, / n zue _ 3r '- / . . .. .: r I — ,� H ^-, LEGEND --,," 2015 Level of Service(LOS) Pearland Traffic Management Plan ---`.� t• A-C 0 2,500 5,000 feel D City Data:http:l/gis.peadandlx.gov/web/;Additional Data:TxDOT K1`MA Br, azoria County,and H-GAC:and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com 0 E Pedestrian Accidents (2013-2019) Purpose From 2013 to 2019 there have been 102 accidents involving vehicles and pedestrians within the City of Pearland,refer to Map 7,Pedestrian Accidents(2013-2019).The colored blotches illustrated on the map depict the areas which have a concentration of pedestrian accidents. Figure 3,Pedestrian Accident Hot Spot Example •.. 1 '. ---1 ::a 1 • _ L,_ 'loopy ... , Findings The intersection of Broadway Street and Cullen Parkway,as depicted in Figure 3,Pedestrian Accident Hot Spot Example,is an example of a hot spot where many vehicular and pedestrian accidents occur.The presence of a retail and commercial shopping center at this intersection without crosswalk markings,is like- ly a factor in the number of vehicular and pedestrian accidents.Other hotspots include northwest Pearland at the intersection of FM 288 and Shadow Creek Parkway and on Broadway Street between Barry Rose Road and Liberty Drive.The aforementioned hotspots also contain retail and commercial shopping centers without pedestrian crosswalks at the intersections. Pedestrian accidents are found throughout Pearland with the heaviest concentration along Broadway Street,a thoroughfare which contains an abundance of retail and commercial shopping areas. Results As retail and commercial centers function as a key draw for pedestrians,traffic calming steps need to be taken to ensure their safety whether lowering vehicular speed limits or by extending the traffic signal timing. 21 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN _ 2 Hobby ...Airport / e MAP 7, PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS (2013-2019) Ei / Illk"--i-' -4--.- -.•-' ' -- January 11.2021 / . 1 ri trun,Bt., ,II, . . / I i i ,&fill*nr.L,,, —Lfj 1111 -4 "4.11 tre 1.;',-,„,,,')' :kl•/* Brookside Village : Knawi.R: . -'., g W ' , .Iv . C-1 p• i 1 ' ----4. , Cs, -' ' Mu/an:Rd ''.------ 0,,Ali. A. ,-1111 i 6.41// ..1.4' . n.c - • ,:. 741 - 4LL.j II [ 4, ..... -> ‘4%., 4___,'")--.. . G:\\.. .-• I. ,.... L_:_,.. JIM: ,., P% • '' 41-.. . , _i. ' ,,„ipl.,r,' Ps* %• • 42. ' .." VI ,de°41W 4.,1,0,,,,s, ''''' 'A' ' C Y's1' - ,e A , .I d,ft --- - ''..: k I %tr . e;'' -4i-T "*--- Wir ,. r :41griGinr—Ni •:-.-11 - Pc . , Rd ci N IT, Illi.-- 1'7 li :i _ Tii.(7_71.7-1• -, ; - /.0 Amn 41AINIrli . ' ' Or e I" al .-,9i F .11Wen....111 , ftligvil / '-stfe,. 4111rION. s ::i' ,, n I 11P,„,-Zing , i le ill. 115114 *4 \4'%.4 / —L7 •_ --..t.iii .**.— ..: ' ,- — ....,... ..r:,-•_ H_____, , -,- In .7..,• ,,, --- it _ N.,. . . ... :...• , 1 _.. L ,,,, i: ,..1-... i ,,,,,,-, /- i Friendswood . [ , . .- _ .. ._- _ - . _• : • .. . --- . -'-, . ., --., ------ 0 . LEGEND Crash Densay -- -,-,,, -'-, Less Crashes _ IN " 102 crashes between "-----„,.., February 2013 and March 2019 ,,,.. CO 0 2,500 5.000 feet City Data,http llgis.pearlandtx.goy/webt,Additional Data:TxDOTAMA,I3razoria County and H-GAC:and Aerial imagery www nearmap com Eli •.: MI More Crashes Bicycle Accidents (2013-2019) Purpose From 2013 to 2019 there have been 71 accidents involving vehicles and bicyclists within the City of Pearland,refer to Map 8,Bicycle Accidents(2013-2019).Similar to the pedestrian accidents shown in Map 7 on page 22,the colored blotches shown on the map illustrate the areas that have a concentration of bicycle accidents. Figure 4,Bicycle Accident Hot Spots w� i M l (At. • r . f../.J.l e'y` 1 'f i( Findings The intersection of Broadway Street and Kirby Drive,as indicated in Figure 4,Bicycle Accident Hot Spots,is an example of a hotspot where many vehicular and bicycle accidents have occurred.Similar to the pedestrian accidents,this intersection contains a retail and commercial uses associated with Pearland Town Center.Other hotspots include the intersection of Hughes Ranch Road and Cullen Boulevard,where Glenda Dawson High School is located.Information from the Pearland Police Department have confirmed that most schools have high incidents of vehicular accidents involving students on bicycles.Although both areas previously mentioned have crosswalk markings,accidents are still prevalent.Other sites with less occurring accidents are found in streets that are near parks,residential homes and gathering spaces. Results Similar to pedestrian accidents,the hotspots for bicycle accidents can be found at large retail and commer- cial areas and schools.Lowering vehicular speed limits and extending the traffic signal timing can aid in lowering accidents. 23 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN r // : Hobby Airport MAP 8, sd rid Ilk. BICYCLE ACCIDENTS (2013-2019) Eldnn y am 1 t _ 1 Brookside Village . . \110 .,.. ,,, ,, ' .1 '411110611.14 '' ,,eVo'j 110444 , ),„(mipiod,_ cs,,. , or. ,...., / Ai f !: l' 1y, 4111 X �� / Aimte In \ /m�� / n, -,.*f. .-„-l'.--,'-;,., -: I`riendswood Q, LEGEND Crash Density � � �� Hanel Less Crashes 1 m . 71 crashes between ��--� --,,= ,'u April 2013 and 0 2.500 5,000 feet April 2019 City Data http:/1gis.peadandtx.goeNreb/:Addll anal Data:TxDOT,F'AAA,Brazoria County.and H-GAC and Aerial imagery-www.nearreap.com 0 �-,- ME More Crashes Vehicular Accidents (2014-2019) Purpose From 2014 to 2019 there were over 10,000 vehicular accidents within the City of Pearland.Map 9,Vehic- ular Accidents(2014-2019)depicts the vehicular accidents within the five-year period with colored rings ranging from less crashes in green to more crashes in red. ..,:e.41.,,..2....7,....„.:4t,H.,...":"..4...,s i r.,._,.:,,:., Figure 5,Vehicular Accident Hot Spot at Broadway Street and Pearland Parkway a r t �v, ti/ ,r; lir ti� f ,n 7... ir ,1/4 L I // At'y Findings Map 9 reveals that concentrations of vehicular accidents have occurred along segments of thoroughfares that have a Level of Service(LOS)rating of D or worse(refer to Map 6,Thoroughfare Level of Service (2015)on page 20).Understandably,the highest concentrations of accidents have occurred where there are the greatest number of turning movements,such as at principal intersections(i.e.,Broadway and Cul- len;Broadway and N.Main;Broadway and Pearland Parkway,refer to Figure 5,Vehicular Accident Hot Spot at Broadway Street and Pearland Parkway). The west-east thoroughfares with the greatest The north-south thoroughfares with the greatest amount of vehicular accidents include: amount of vehicular accidents include: — Broadway Street(FM 518)—LOS:E/F — SH 288—LOS:unavailable — Shadow Creek Parkway—LOS:C/D — Cullen Boulevard—LOS:E/F — Magnolia Street—LOS:D — Mykawa Road—LOS:E/F Results As indicated in the two previous analyses involving pedestrian and bicycle accidents,like Figure 4 on page 23,Figure 5 is another example of a retail and commercial area that has had a high number of accidents. 25 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN • w... Houston , Airport r � . ,. MAP 9, ;t . VEHICULAR ACCIDENTS 4// (2014-2019) a:..... January 11,2021 40. 1 ., .•. • . •••1.4.1•• • ,. ` s .. Brookside Village 1 t .R. ' , ,may. .. t' .. • *--tfhte• ... ° ., •' • Allt ..11•'• .' • • - '... . . litir 0... 14 W. "lika...... -. „lbw _ ilk 14,...., 4:: . .• • ,fir--w • , :'' ,.. , • lits.V 14,..41, • � _ , � is _� . El rj rf► • P/ *1 t\. N o. Q ..•.... d E 0 L'6 .�� • ma r.. ` Friendswood I. "" LEGEND Crash Density Manvel Less Crashes MI 10,233 crashes between June 2014 �.,,� © 0 2,500 5,000 feel and June 2019 City Data:http://gis.pearlandta.gov/web/,Additional Data:TX DOT FEMA>8razoria County,a\GAC and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com 0 - More Crashes Neighborhood Analysis Purpose Map 10,Neighborhood Analysis,identifies the principal entrances into residential subdivisions.As this study is intend- ed to be a high-level connectivity analysis between points of origin and principal destinations,it was jointly decided to not focus on pedestrian facilities within residential subdivisions,as the operation and maintenance of so many subdivisions do not fall under the jurisdiction of the City of Pearland.As with the Destination Analysis(described on page 29),the objective was to identify the thoroughfares that provide access to as many residential subdivisions as possible in order to identify the routing alignment of pedestrian facilities that will accommodate the greatest number of residents.Later tasks will evaluate the connection of active transportation facilities along public thoroughfares with pedestrian facilities within residential subdivisions,including those which may not be within the City's jurisdiction,such as MUDs and PDs. Findings and Results A complete lnlerseetion et Trinity Bay Drive and Shadow Creek Parkway. Over 540 access points were Identified.Appendix A of this plan lists in alphabeti- cal order each red circle/entry point identified in Map 10.Within each of the neigh 4F/ - borhood access points(red circles)the following elements have been identified: — Subdivision Entry Street — Cross Street ••• — Access to(Type of Thoroughfare,Trail,or Potential Trail) t�+ — Presence/Absence of Sidewalks: 44 • "Y(Sidewalks)",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry y point. • "Y(Trail)",there is direct access to a trail. • "Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other. ` • "N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. AJ , — Presence/Absence of Crosswalks • "Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point. 'Incomplete'Intereeolan et Liberty Drive and • "N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point. shady Bend Drive. • "Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersec- tion.In some cases,a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. — Presence/Absence of Pedestrian Ramps ,y • "Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street. • "N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible. • "N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. k Of the 545 total subdivision entry points,66 percent have access to sidewalks and trails(28 percent of those sidewalks are"Incomplete",i.e.,).28 percent have at least one painted crossing at the entry point intersection,66 percent have no crosswalks available.And 52 percent have a pedestrian ramp or some accessi- bility at the entry point and sidewalk.48 of the access points or 9 percent have a possible access to a"Potential Trail"or proposed trail.These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to ac- cess these trails in the future. 27 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN • Houston Hobby Airport __ ® J55 MAP 10, NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS .�,.., .....,.,� ®,...._.._.,......_'._.. .... .. ........... — .,� _ January 11.2021 x ,Sit„l_- \ Brooksid Village B M ..r —L_t` 9 IP ,T a ... -,. o u / 1, --- , _- is 1 1 . 1 - ` i- • II. 0 84 s'D ii r 1 .... k, 400. dip ..:,, lii.. II/6 i e,) ' oil , L'• ... #•�..ft II ID 0 4111144:\ 4 -. Wit :_.o._ �� •�_rem... ". ; 1 r..• •.49 4. millillIO i q 1 c. .2 . �( am dm Y t l • i MEM" ' le e\ (. 12 ' \sk4 ., • i, • NS/ ——0 ' ___ _ .\_ h\-E\....1:1" PAR, t II I \ , off a � err / Friendswood — t . . ~. ,� O'+-• Y; ., ..... 9, LEGEND rl any - ., ..»,. O 120'ROW Neighborhood Access Points MI — Residential Areas moo 100'ROW z a • •-`---`\,,,..., 0 V - 2.500 5.000 feet ' 80'ROW City Data httpalgis-pearls ,Additional Data:TxDOT,�EMA Brazoria County,and H-GAC;and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com 0 —— \\ 60'ROW Destination Analysis Purpose As depicted in Map 11,Destination Analysis,several specific locations as well as general districts were identified as destination points that warrant active transportation accessibility.These destinations include schools,parks and fitness centers,libraries and museums,commercial centers,and park'n ride transit lots. The objective is to"connect the dots,'so to speak,from points of origin,i.e.,neighborhood and subdivision entrances,to these destinations,by way of a safe,efficient and connected network of active transportation facilities. Map 11,Destination Analysis also depicts proposed Major,Minor,and Residential Retail Nodes,as de- picted on the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan(map prepared February 2019).As summa- rized in Chapter 3,Mobility,of the City's Comprehensive Plan(2015),and in Section 2.4.4.1.of the City's Unified Development Code(UDC),regarding the potential establishment of Residential Retail Nodes. Subsection(j)(2)cites the"existence or provision of pedestrian access,including but not limited to walk- ways,bikeways,trails,and traffic controls,to promote safe pedestrian friendly access and environment." Findings All destinations shown in the legend are found throughout Pearland as parks,schools,and residential retail nodes are evenly dispersed while the large commercial retail areas are primarily found near Broadway Street.The largest destinations by area are the Lower Kirby District,288 Gateway District and the SH 35 Corridor Redevelopment District. Results The analysis of destinations within Pearland indicate an even dispersal of facilities for pedestrians.Review and analysis of Map 12,Sidewalks(page 32)and Map 13,Existing Trails(page 34)reveals the disconti- nuity of active transportation routes from points of origin and key destinations. 29 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN / / Hobby ,'Airport a�..'� MAP 11, �y � °' DESTINATION ANALYSIS / .. — J January 11,2021 Materna s L 0 iom Bass Torn lassEI rrenco Les 1 D tryt 'VV.' • ' ! me s • • Tan Boon e q "e comyNxe osneEow Clear CreN • EJ�,unan Geek Ranch $chow Ure . Golt ClvC • N Univenhy / peach F']NA Tn1 . I Houston x e •Vcio �. CI lake �' • ParF'n'RiEe UEnN• eaarinJGrll Clon I .1 Sch d I Cen�rYrys E.eatery y a e ( «Y' Event CeaMer Ge Ja Dawson ++ E e • h9n$C: Hkkwy ~ DeOO/ t�g r _mitO )L tedown • Sbuyfifi a $ V TI leag 268 y Hume '-. m IT • Gat ric( • • W(lrangc it • .rnks,tle ' 1� /k •Woadr51rxl 2yoNrabdl • oerlE Garr Thett Center Broadwn ::e:R cornset,. • • of e wayd a.nn�iiycme ..b>. Co mercrai • / 7 . L ry I! : • I� v g+a l • DIxeF� - -,. a s a `"" sonny Old Townsite Roaa t_,�P LIi�♦ e 7 _ ioo as :,r.it N5.SCF ik anon�Cen�er EldmnleN "aii •Elan e,ir nf�A• • &Feol Sr�wIN Cemenmal C Center a �` • • d to?1e• I„ cp`,,,od • Jrn�. •and u ixieFarm 6saunn cola 'VMS' scup _ •St1.,:.1 erHa11• EL1 LPOT menial wooeemek C V Gun • Eeade Tral NIX A ea f ? i ,.♦ Glaane•ElrmanuN •_ ♦ `.•a I I •'�_oetw renw�cn t�i •na,Pn , .. I ,� te pSibeiE ♦yr.1 I I N:eemer I IrdeperO • R[ � Nemo M / • L1�dlo5es Jonn Hargro Erm^n;ary ilarland Eat roerITee� 5 col \ n_ School• Pm Hollow Complex • /tl J _ l t ♦L -i • Nigh Bc Csr,, • rncMN { ".rC .` 1111., +�..Y Imo. t"" iry ♦ pl, '�` . .. r a t''s 5 1• f 35 ,' Z7 .,®p '•;e 1 ...; _ � � �� I...' A`aa a Remotion ,..' �,e Canlx end NINNIIY ,y. l �' 1 c e°ekc y /I a 5 C eM.o sa "=ta /r J \ —1-,. ..... • \[ „V _ r}nendswood r Kirby District '�._.` menial Areas \^ Q iownsite SH 35 Corridor �' 0 2,500 5,000 feet City Data:http://gis.pearlandtx.goo/web/,Additional Data:TxDOT.rEMA,5razoria County,and H-GAC:and Aerial Imagery:wwnearmap.com 0 _ r,a.Minor and Residential "` ` w. Nodes I Sidewalks Purpose Map 12,Sidewalks,depicts the sidewalks that have been constructed within the City of Pearland that have been recorded and mapped by the City's GIS Department.Most sidewalks have been constructed within new residential subdivisions,in compliance with Division 11—Sidewalks&Alleys,of the City's Subdivision Regulations.The intent is to provide safe and efficient access to the City's network of sidewalks from a subdivision's principal entrance,because there are several subdivisions that do not have sidewalks.As depicted in Figure 6,Sidewalk Detail,existing sidewalks and ADAAccessible Ramps(in blue circles)have been identified. Figure 6,Sidewalk Detail 11111M4ftKil 10 ' Orl; 41441t' _ -7:04•4; 14 - , '4)1011, 1\0 • c • -fit-, JCP • i Broad I I I Findings As noted above,sidewalks are primarily found within residential subdivisions and along the street frontages of retail and commercial areas while the remainder of Pearland contains trails(Map 13,page 34),or no sidewalks at all. Results Additional trailhead connections between sidewalks and trails will need to be constructed in order to achieve a continuous pedestrian accessway throughout Peadand. 31 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN ;-... ‘ . , E 35 MAP 12, SIDEWALKS �^ 1 �---. January 1 1,2021 • wi+i»1 NEa ti i t _ iµ a a n ' a V 5' z— ..„-gilf - -dir!-- , '..°.:--.7'-- —--r 1 ri. . , , "H"---/ :145. L41 *'Ø! i A4 ,,,,,;:>. '.1r4,;' if-, 44P,'',,_/ A ''''.- .,=' -' 1 ,Ellfilillia SIIII,. I .0,,,,,./411F1:/4/4 l‘, ;< •- a / tt III �, ry 1 , el,. ; ��a,. 1. III,,-, _ • 14Ø ' tlilti' 1 i 117"ligiri? ' ' ' I - --- _, ,, ,, , .. 0110fir .*kia ; — ' :.- .""Nr ' = MS It 114.14+, ,..:, e • -‘/ .,,,,:,--,- ,,./ Z� fl._ n R.:. "y / 7 , / ., / _ -,,,,,, ',. aLEGEND Sidewalks • ADA Ramps 0 2,500 5,000 feet City Data:http:!/gis.pearlandt cgoy/webn Additional Data:TzDOT..'FEA4A,,Brazoria County,and H-GAC:and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com 0 0 Existing Trails Purpose A system of parks and recreation areas is not complete without linear linkages between facilities and connections to neighborhoods,schools,and other public facilities.Existing trails offer an alternative mode of travel,typically in proximity to the often busy,heavily trafficked roads.Trails also provide connections from neighborhoods to parks and schools and commercial/retail areas.The city of Peadand currently has 19 trails,refer to Table 3,City of Pearland Existing Trails,for trail name and length;and Map 13,Existing Trails,for location.The total miles of existing city trails is 16.1 miles;which equates to approximately one mile of trail for every 7,061 residents in the city.The numbered trails in Table 3 and Map 13 highlight the major trail systems within the city which were ana- lyzed further in Appendix B of this plan.Pedestrian Level of Service(PLOS).Appendix B provides an analysis of the trail system using criteria to determine its physical condition,ease of use,and safety conditions to derive a single and overall rating.The PLOS also supplied opportunities for improvement(e.g.,benches,lighting,trees, etc.)with order of magnitude costs.In addition to city trails,there are a number of trails that have been constructed as amenities for residential subdivisions.Some trails have been constructed within transmission easements and/ or drainage corridors while other trails have been constructed to circumnavigate stormwater detention basins. Table 3,City of Pearland Existing Trails Centennial Park Trail 11 Pine Hollow Park Trail 2 Clear Creek Trail-East(Green Tee Terrace) 12 Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trail 3 Clear Creek Trail-West 13 Southdown Park Trail 4 Corrigan-Woody Park Trail 14 South Gate Park Trail 5 Cypress Village Park Trail 15 The Sports Complex at SCR Trail 6 Edible Fruit Trail I6 Town Ditch Trail 7 Independence Park Trail 17 Trails at JHEC 8 Mary's Creek Trail(Central) 18 Woodcreek Park Trail 9 Mary's Creek Trail(East) 19 Zychlinski Park Trail 10 Mary's Creek Trail(West) Findings The most extensive,circuitous trails are those that have been constructed within the Shadow Creek development; and Mary's Creek Trail,which connects the West Oaks Trail network to the John Hargrove Environmental Com- plex,and the Centennial Park Trail.Trails are constructed of either reinforced concrete or decomposed granite with steel or concrete edging to hold the material in place.Both construction materials have benefits as a concrete trail has a longer lifespan while a decomposed granite trail is more comfortable to the walking or running trail user. As stated above,more detail can be found in the Pedestrian Level of Service portion of the study.The City of Pearland has plans for the addition of trails at a future date as depicted on the Map 19,Future Trails(page 62). Results Once the combination of the existing and proposed trails and sidewalks is in place,the system of active trans- portation facilities will provide safe and efficient access from residential subdivisions to destinations throughout the City of Pearland. 33 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN E Egil i.2._! MAP 13, EXISTING TRAILS Ei .. ,r ,iii: El January 11,2021 -..--1 LH \ / .1.1''r"41,?.."' \ L_L....1 \ ,-... ( / z.--f \ 4, „,., ,,, ,. / —,.....- ., • Tay C2tch --.-I= ' — c ' 1 a i ' . , MI .!; i .....:S.j'''',..7.,'. 1i / 0 T 'CV,i'.„/ 0 t= - ma -=V .... t, .....,.. vark Trail = 9. Cler Cm* -Lfifil*Ti.,../ Trail(Ent) .., .., HLIXECT1 / ( E _, , I • .. . ... i[ ukom, i . -b5M,.. .-1 __ , ;! ,,, 4. 6- .t,...11,- =1,ay.„ a • Par*'rat ' 1 ' ' -•4.• ?-.i 15:1 TGr al 6 ri-itgiceninin. bikil El• • . k...is". 1.. m 1_, -, , ....„.„ , ri 5 17 , -..„, ......- : . ..,„ 1 4.. X .,-, :Fr:, g!tr,.. --- • "•,,,,, i _.. , . .6.1-...., .. ,. .,:, ...,*=•-11 .....,,,,,,.., , ..... 3.v1144,1 In / / 88 , 2 ,... P.,ta lie -"rx ir L „1 I . ..r v .....„).,..-1, -1..._ , 7 ,4, . ..1 :,.• 4 , 0 , LEGEND Existing Sidewalks —Existing City Trails —Existing Subdivision Trails 0 2,500 5,000 feet —Existing County Trails City Data:http://gis.peadandtx gov/web/,Additional Data TxDOT,FEMA,Brazona County,and H-GAC.and Aerial imagery:www nearmap.com 011.1 • Existing Trailheads * Existing Bridges Future Thoroughfare Improvements Purpose Map 14,Future Thoroughfare Improvements(based on the City of Pearland's Thoroughfare Plan,2018) summarizes the plan to add capacity and construct new roads to complete principal thoroughfares.The numbers on the map correspond to Tables 4A and 4B,Future Thoroughfare Improvements,which lists the location,description and schedule of improvements. Findings Each corridor shown in Map 3,Principal Corridors(page 6)is scheduled for added capacity or widening within certain sections with Reid Road(#21 and#22),Mykawa Road(#35 and#36)and Old Alvin Road (#39 and#40)slated to have two sections for renovation. 35 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN t MAP 14,� ;J, a 3S FUTURE THOROUGHFARE . ` =x IMPROVEMENTS ' 1 WI". January 11,2021 2 1 1 ---• I \21 mr 7 Ili r J r ' Lim El 133 "t13 13 i13, :113 : 35 Ilk c: / I \ 38 ' ...410 , .._... . L. a I 19 10 ' _,,_./- . - • ',/Y11 II* CF 59 y l Y —.._-_„„,, , .,„ , ,,,\ / 13 . : \ r 2 - _, .■. ...a——y.r4t9�i9"i .,, t, �-w-,.._.,�, 8 , - mesa �..�... � dj •♦ 7. E,l,�� 131_ _ \i' .4.cil L__, .'• .o. ;' emu; A. y � — y i Et1< is , . I : ♦'_ • Lam:r §aF `iLi1� - - d 2 � ,. .. .�:..a, e, � A19 ,, r,,,, LEGEND Bnrm ENI 120'ROW - o '$ 100'ROW �`'" ..¢ =80'ROW -� 0 2,500 5,000 feet City Data http://gis.pearlandtx.gov/webt,Addition. to TxDOT,FEMA Brazona County,and H-GAC;and Aerial imagery:www.nsarmap.com 0 ��60'ROW ` Road to be Improved Page left blank intentionally 37 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 4A,Future Thoroughfare Improvements Roadway From To Future Road Improvements Description Schedule 1 Alameda School Road Clear Creek Sam Houston Tollway Widen from 2 to 4-lane divided. 2028.still planned 2 N Spectrum Boulevard/W Riley Road FM 521 SH 288 Pearland Economic Development Corporation(PEDC) Development Driven 3 S Spectrum Road Kirby Drive Promenade Drive Peadand Economic Development Corporation(PEDC) Development Driven 4 Buffalo Speedway FM 521 Kirby Drive Peadand Economic Development Corporation(PEDC) Development Driven 5 Fruge Road Hooper Road Kirby Drive Peadand Economic Development Corporation(PEDC) Development Driven 6 Promenade Drive Sam Houston Tollway Clear Creek Peadand Economic Development Corporation(PEDC) Development Driven 7 Magnolia Road/CR 59 FM 521 Kirby Drive Widen from 2 to 4-lane with bridge and complete road to connect to Trammel-Fresno Road. >2030 8 Bailey Road/CR 101 FM 521 Allen Road Connecting Pomona Parkway to CR 894 to W Sycamore Road.When complete,a 4-lane divided curb and Development Driven gutter. 9 Post Road FM 521 Airline Road Complete and widen existing Post Road to be a 4-lane divided. Development Driven 10 Savannah Parkwa Windward Ba Dr Arrowhead Point Complete Savannah Parkway 4-lane divided north to Windward Bay Drive.Woodfin Road midway needs to y y widen from 2 to 4-lane divided. Development Driven 11 SH 288 Add capacity,traffic flow improvements,and toll lanes. 2019,under construction 12 Smith Ranch Road Hughes Ranch Road 200'south of Hickory Slough Widen from 2 to 4-land divided curb and gutter. 2021 13 Wooten Road Broadway St Smith Ranch Road Add capacity and complete connection. _ >2030 14 Miller Ranch Road Hughes Ranch Road Broadway Street/FM 518 Add capacity. 2025 15 Hughes Ranch Road Smith Ranch Road Stone Road Widen from 2 to 4-lanes,add median and shoulders,and sidewalks. 2019,under construction 16 Hillhouse Road McHard Road Hughes Ranch Road Complete and widen road. >2030 17 McHard Road Cullen Blvd Mykawa Road Add capacity. 2020,under construction 18a Broadway Street SH 288 Cullen Pkwy Widen to 6-Lane divided. 2023 18b Broadway Street Cullen Pkwy SH 35 Widen to 6-Lane divided. 2025 19 Fite Road Cullen Pkwy McLean Road Widen road from 2 to 4-lanes. >2030 20 Stone Road Brookside Road Hughes Ranch Road Add capacity. >2030 21 Reid Road Beltway 8 Reid Road Proposed connection instead of extending Stone Road north. >2030 22 Reid Road McHard Road Hughes Ranch Road Widen from 2 to 4 lanes divided curb and gutter. 2027,still planned 23 Roy Road Brookside Road Broadway Street/FM 518 Add capacity. >2030 24 Hughes Ranch Road Reid Road Garden Road Construct 4-lane. 2027.still planned 25 Garden Road Brookside Road Broadway Street/FM 518 Add capacity. >2030 Page left blank intentionally 39 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 48,Future Thoroughfare Improvements Roadway From To Future Road Improvements Description Schedule 26 O'Day Road/Harkey Road Brookside Road Hastings-Cannon Road Widen road from 2 to 4-lane divided curb and gutter. 2026/2028 27 Orange Street O'Day Road Hatfield Road Construct a 4-land undivided. >2030 28 Hatfield Road Brookside Road Broadway Street/FM 518 Add capacity. >2030 29 Woody Road Brookside Road Broadway Street/FM 518 Widen and complete road between McHard Road and Orange Street. >2030 30 Aimee Lane McLean Road Manvel/Masters Road Add capacity and extend road. >2030 31 Croix Road/McKeever Road/ SH 288 SH 35 Connect Croix Road to McKeever Road to Dixie Farm Road.Widen Road and connect where there are gaps. >2030 Dixie Farm Road Widen to 4 lanes. 32 Hastings Cannon Road Harkey Road Hastings Road/FM 2351(W Edgewood Drive) Add capacity,widen road,complete road to connect to Hastings Road. >2030 33 McLean Rd Magnolia Road/CR 59 McKeever Rd Add capacity. >2030 34 Williams Dr McLean Road Veterans Dr Add capacity. >2030 35 Mykawa Road Sam Houston Tollway Broadway Street/FM 518 Widen from 2 to 4-lanes with raised median(south of McHard Road)and flush median(north of McHard Road). 2021 36 Mykawa Road Broadway Street Walnut Street Construct new 4-lane divided to connect Mykawa Road to Veterans Drive/CR 143. >2030 37 Veterans Drive/CR 143 Walnut St Hastings-Cannon Road Widen from 2 to 4-lane divided curb and gutter. >2030 38 Walnut Street Broadway St and McLean Road Broadway Street and Barry Rose Road Create a Broadway Street couplet-change Walnut street(south)to a one-way east and Broadway Street 2025 (north)to one-way west.Configure unknown with Broadway. 39 Old Alvin Road Knapp Road McHard Road Add capacity. >2030 40 Old Alvin Road Hampshire St John Lizer Road Add capacity. >2030 41 Wells Drive Bailey Road/CR 101 Hastings-Cannon Road Add capacity and complete road. >2030 42 Hughes Road Pearland Parkway City Limits Widen from 2 to 4-lanes divided. 2026 43 Liberty Drive Pearland Parkway Country Club Drive Add capacity. >2030 44 Industrial Drive Railroad Dixie Farm Road Add capacity and connect road to Dixie Farm Road. >2030 45 Hastings Oil Field Road Cowart Creek Diversion Rustic Lane Add capacity and connect road to Cloverfield Road. >2030 46 Pearland Parkway Dixie Farm Road Hastings Rd/FM 2351(W Edgewood Drive) Construct 4-lane divided. >2030 47 Westfield Road Dixie Farm Road Stevenson Road Add capacity. >2030 48 Stevenson Road Dixie Friendswood Road Rustic Lane Add capacity. >2030 49 Dixie Friendswood Road Dixie Farm Road Cloverfield Road Add capacity. >2030 50 Rustic Lane Stevenson Road FM 2351 ON Edgewood Dr) Add capacity. >2030 Thoroughfare Reconstruction Phasing Plan Purpose To expand on the Future Thoroughfare Improvements(Map 14)analysis,Map 15,Thoroughfare Re- construction Phasing Plan was developed using the planned roadway reconstruction schedule from the City of Pearland Engineering Department.At the time of this study,the Phasing Plan depicts the timeframe for expansion or reconstruction of the roadways within incremental periods of 0-5 years,5-10 years,and 10 years and beyond. Findings Map 15 illustrates that the concentration of new proposed construction occurs within central Pearland.The 0-5 year thoroughfare reconstruction period occurs primarily along McHard Rd,the 5-10 year thoroughfare reconstruction period occurs primarily along Broadway Street,while the 10 year and beyond thoroughfare reconstruction period occurs primarily along Reid/Manvel Road. 41 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN / obby / , _Airpo _ MAP 15, THOROUGHFARE RECONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN { n rr { - s. . . -.- -.. L II 1 - - \..:_131:7ks • - IV. -.- •. , a L� '! /� { g , zr III i Jill", ` t dip ' inem - _ _I. i In - ...-. -Ai . Pi"' A / -____i, „. , %. ...., ....._ ... _ __ _ . _ _ 4f-- -- VP P141- 411011, _ _ k iih\__ tap n,,,,, 8:40,04itddirf .,,,,,;-',7' : Lio. . 1 . kli 10I Friendswood s - O ~ 4 i LEGEND Phasing: �" Manvel 1 City Limits at 0 to 5 Years(2020-2025) ETJ 5 to 10 Years(2025-2030) Schools it 10+Years(2030+) •..,•a;. ,- .� ' � ,, \ .. .. -_. . :...^.' Right-of-Way(ROW): Perks and Open Spaces A 0 2,500 5000f 120'ROW 80'ROW City Data:http://gm peadandtx.goy/web/Addition •ate:T%DOT,FE , azona County,and H-GAC:and Aerial image www.nearmap.com —Creeks/Bayous ■ ■ __ N., Water Bodies 100'ROW — 60'ROW Page left blank intentionally 43 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Proposed Street Sections Purpose The Proposed Street Sections, found in Figures 7A-D, on pages 45-46, illustrate expanded pedestrian facilities, as compared to the original Existing Street Sections (Figures 2A-D, pages 15-16). The Pro- posed Street Sections were informed in part by the Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS) found in Ap- pendix B, as it balances the need for safer pedestrian accessways in proximity to thoroughfares. Findings The Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS) reveals that pedestrian comfort and safety levels are directly associated with the width of sidewalks or trails.A wide pathway enables multiple users to utilize the trail at the same time without altering their path or slowing down. This is also critical with sidewalks adjacent to vehicular thoroughfares as pedestrians and bicyclists are in close proximity of moving vehicles. Separating the sidewalk from the thoroughfare using landscaped buffers and sidewalks allow users to safely navigate along the side of the street and increases their sense of comfort and safety. As determined by the City of Pearland's Engineering Department and depicted in the following street sec- tions, all roadways with 100-and 120-foot rights-of-ways shall have a minimum 10-foot-wide sidewalk.All roadways with 80-foot and less rights-of-ways shall have a minimum 8-foot-wide sidewalk. Proposed costs within the Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs (pages 53-58) show the final build-out of the preferred width of the sidewalks. Note: 10-foot-wide sidewalks represent the preferred width of proposed sidewalks, but this width remains to be confirmed in the field, prior to construction. ADOPTED January 11,2021 44 . 411cf jilt Figure 7A, Proposed Street Sections: 80 ft. R.O.W. Major Collector 80' R.O.W. Major Collector Section Four-lane undivided roadway with separated shared use 8-foot sidewalks; and an additional 2-foot buffer on either side. .:, '- '-., '; fir s it 2'-0^-. 9--0- r.S- 11'.0^ 11'-a- 1 r-o- 11'4" r.s^ EA" r.-Ira- SIDE- TYP. LANE LANE LANE LANE TYP. SIDE- WALK WALK 44'CURD TO CURB 1 OW R.O.W. Figure 7B, Proposed Street Sections: 100 ft. R.D.W. Secondary Thoroughfare 100' R.O.W. Secondary Thoroughfare Section Four-lane undivided roadway with separated shared use 10-foot sidewalks and an additional 8-foot buffer on either side for landscape enhancements. - i 1 i II Amomp1 9'-0" 10'-0" 9'-i^ 11'-0" _ 11'-a' 11'-0^ 11'-0" 9'4^ 10'4," r-r TYP. SIDEWALK TYP. LANE LANE LANE LANE TYP. SIDEWALK TYP. 4.4'CURD TO CURB 100'R.O.W. 45 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Figure 7C, Proposed Street Sections: 100 ft. R.O.W. Secondary Thoroughfare with Median 100' R.O.W. Secondary Thoroughfare with Median Section Four-lane divided roadway with a 12-foot median; separated shared use 10-foot sidewalks; and an additional 2-foot buffer on either side. : j r � � ' a . . 10•-0" .. r-r 1r-6- 12C-0- 1r4r ir-O- ir-o- r-0- 1D'-0- r-o NE'SIDEWALK TYP. LA LANE MEDIAN LANE LANE TYP. SIDEWALK \.r a- T1fI. TYP. 24'CURS TO CURE 24'CURB TO CURB 100'PLOW. Figure 7D, Proposed Street Sections: 120 ft. R.O.W. Major Thoroughfare 120' R.O.W. Major Thoroughfare Section Four-lane divided roadway with a 18-foot median; separated shared use 10-foot sidewalks; and an additional 8-foot buffer on either side for landscape enhancements. t 1 g - -. - Ip 6'47 10•47" a-o- tr.fr 12.4f 11W4" 1r4" 12'.6" OW^ 10'.O" 5.0" TYP. SIDEWALK TYP. LANE LANE MEDLAN LAME LANE TYP. SIDEWALK TYI. 26'CURS TO CURE 2E'CURS TO CURS I 120'MOM. ADOPTED January 11,2021 46 Existing Sidewalks Analysis Purpose An analysis of the existing conditions of sidewalks along all principal corridors identified within Map 3, Principal Corridors,was performed to determine whether the construction or expansion of sidewalks is re- quired to meet the spatial criteria illustrated in Figures 7A-D, Proposed Street Sections on pages 45-46. The analysis was divided into five categories as depicted in Map 16, Existing Sidewalks Analysis. The categories are as follows: - Category 1: No sidewalk exists, and construction of a sidewalk is cost prohibitive. Cost prohibitive examples include adding a sidewalk to cross an existing bridge or adding a pedestrian bridge to cross a roadway overpass. - Category 2: A sidewalk exists, and no construction shall commence as the addition of a sidewalk is cost prohibitive. Cost prohibitive examples are similar to those in Category 1. Category 3: No sidewalk exists, new construction is required. The width of the new sidewalk is de- tailed in Figures 7A-D (pages 45-46). - Category 4: A sidewalk exists, but new construction in the form of adding onto the existing sidewalk is required to bring it to the proposed width. ammo Category 5: A sidewalk exists, and it is the desired width. The Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs on page 53-58 only reflect Categories 3 and 4 and indicate sidewalk construction on both sides of the road. Findings A tabulation of the each category is as follows: — Category 1: 6.14 miles — Category 2: 3.64 miles cailvi Category 3: 71.89 miles - Category 4: 81.39 miles - Category 5: 8.48 miles Results In terms of length, Categories 3 and 4 are close while the rest of the categories fall far behind.This indicates that while the existing sidewalks are constructed according to the current city standard widths, the same length of sidewalk will need to be constructed with the proposed widths. 47 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN El E MAP 16, EXISTING SIDEWALKS ANALYSIS LI . 1 LI January 11,2021 1 ' • i II. t- . - — - —2? 1 BroolGdo Rd / ii-';'' i 1 I .. It PAcHard Rd 15,515 Rd L± 1 .5" 2 - II : • ----1 ..... __ , ...,..7... if. i tiff ' i I I 1 .. ' .:-.---.-•1,,, ...4:-.- -- 1 •. go B, Sin 5113. I••' -I_ \ _, .,- 9'9297 Or C ' T-1- r 1/ 1....__.r ...e.*( -:‘,--,21 .. 1 "(‹. • * .•'.' 1 '... (' ,-.,.,t,. '' I 4:,, ___..--.•"'". . c. ,:, ,.. 1 1 - Li C.----------t ‘" :.- ‘ / El i'' --,. ,-.,•`-' ''''' / illa 0 . "If ) 'e :WI,P.nod Rd HJSPIN,Cat,r0r.Rd Has,.9 Cannon Rd .._, —. -.... C3 LEGEND Category 1:No Sidewalk Exists-No New Construction, New Construction of a Sidewalk Is Cost Prohibitive. Category 2:Sidewalk Exists-.No Addition,Addition of a Sidewalk 0G Cost Prohibitive. 0 2,500 5,000 feet Category 3:No Sidewalk Exists-New Construction is Required. City Data:http://gIs.pearlandtx.goy/webf:Additional Data:TxDOT,FE , zone County.and H-GAC;and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.com Category 4:Sidewalk Exists-Addition Needed. ii Category 5:Sidewalk Exists and is at the Desired Width Proposed Sidewalks Phasing Program Map 17,Proposed Sidewalks Phasing Program,illustrates a network of proposed sidewalks that provide pedestrians with a connected active transportation system to be constructed in conjunction with the princi- pal thoroughfares to be reconstructed.as illustrated in Map 15, Thoroughfare Reconstruction Phasing Plan,on page 42.Just as in the Thoroughfare Reconstruction Plan,the Proposed Sidewalks Phasing Program is divided into yearly increments(0-5 years,5-10 years,and 10-15 years)to construct the side- walks in stages due to planned budgets and to limit the disruption in traffic. The labels lettered A-Z relate to Table 5A-C,Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs for pro- posed sidewalk improvements. Results The agreed-upon phasing program incorporates key thoroughfares into a series of circuits which span east to west and connect a significant number points of origin to key destinations,such as schools,parks,and commercial/retail centers. 49 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MAP 17, 288 351 PROPOSED SIDEWALKS PHASING PROGRAM :.:.:..8 B January 11,2021 w la nslxn a _ _ $ 4 N FA Ei Mefferd Rd Ai .. Crest Ploy �.._ = t: � 0 Brookside Rd I� ` n WWI Vv © c © 1. D Q iki,Avt...... Q T) y t ©NKMs R.nrh Re �i. — '— �' — - - p `ti 14 ( 10 �J . l I �i • F 4 41 �v0 PJC��1 111 _ g e G •' \ AO c 4 ill �!/ gi:„.„1,-. '€} .,I, Q Brosdw'y sI(FM 510) ©Broadway St(FM 5101 :,♦ 'j t( (' lr _ . . is-qt. .-- , . Gr Q �' r=III ''F. © 0 --=_�/ 'iG . 7. �.' fit ii4a I i� © r w f .�. Cis ® • ./' y ti- John User Rd , �. `� Ca SY E ' r.7_ 1lA rtii;1&y. 1 1 i.:: r 3 '"f, �Y ✓ � pG G ..y /} .333. �• r f - ,gam—_-` ��\air � Tom• MIN � � i r� �� +y a - ; E i©: --fCR 101) x, Masi* f. 1, t 11001�.�-j ♦� m T ., ,,,-..q,' \ _. , ,. " , 7. - Poe Rd I \\ tY/ �9 tiL :. —\__ _• E , �'.— ois.{ , 3.� 0 LEGEND Phase I(0-5 years;2020-2025) =10-ft sidewalk both sides of road Existing Sidewalks p 8-ft.sidewalk both sides of road iwisi.Existing 10-ft.wide Sidewalk —10-ft sidewalk on one side of road Phase II(5-10 years:2025-2030) n •- O =10-ft sidewalk both sides of road 0 2,500 5,000 feet —10-ft sidewalk on one side of road City Data:httpJ/gls.pearlandtx.govlwebf;Additional Data:TxDOT,FE , aria County,and H-GAC:and Aerial imagery www.nearmap.com 0 Phase III(10-15 years,2030-2035) =10-ft.sidewalk both sides of road —10-ft sidewalk on one side of road Existing Trails and Proposed Sidewalks Interface As depicted in Map 18,Existing Trails and Proposed Sidewalks Phasing,the network of existing trails was compared to the proposed sidewalk program to further evaluate active transportation(pedestrian)con- nectivity between trails and sidewalks;as well as where additional trailheads may be required(refer to Map 19,Proposed Trails and Trailheads,page 62).There clearly is a lack of pedestrian facilities in the eastern portion of the city,particularly in the residential areas east of Old Alvin Drive,flanking Peariand Parkway. The labels lettered A-Z relate to Table 5A-C,Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs for pro- posed sidewalk improvements. 51 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MAP 18, Z ® EXISTING TRAILS AND PROPOSED SIDEWALKS PHASING �e 1 e�yy, Ei January 11,2021 Conn eM R15MThe Sports OM 4112 eA TanBre Iril 'le, 6W pyY r- © Nika eM BiMa inN T 1 Shadow Creek C�a' beset. 6vusnain uiry '='f� µ^eeapo� 15 R re Trail CI rCreek NYa © i iM(est f f et ihtr �.�. � a.�.� ��;°!�° e.�a�r, ` � fuldwen .� F © e I D light iM BIb Trail SPark Tri'"' w/ � 1 • 1 © � �`tie` z �a�� fr h�eakl q liftillt%.,... P+MTral Ill ._ a —:•4^� fpi.� �O ��` ppl' Clear Dn.CM Bode Fern Road P,v e�ii C^rPa Ii eel Y �bvC M XMe and Bike Trail e .1 . , “,,,,,,. r 4cN.n..51��m y1 P. IIJL! r L d�rm if t°p"!wr Ni ira l r'°a� O j , B Get ryr )'( tasi girt - lino Canes'- �f a ��ialiEeatlM - e" J °='' I+ II a \y ! 1� 1 i ICYW V 'T 1 /mPPitk Tv'I';fir 1 J I i \ 1� PeA hall Eh'ameenebl © •* ` "'1 R, � - ntwnpba -tea.°^ rl -u --1 Apr 1 —GYs 3.* „' I {� y fJ ar aa ". ` aw / 28W eiC'oa.t3" , *r �a I ... , \ “v,',,,,°:'„ / a .yao, ., / „: , _ 6 -._- LEGEND Phase I(0-5 years;2020-2025) --- —Sidewalk both sides of road Existing Sidewalks Sidewalk on one side of road Existing 10-ft.wide Sidewalk Existing City Trails Phase II(5-10 years;2025-2030) Sidewalk both sidesidesof road —Existing Subdivision Trails —Sidewalk on one side of road 0 0 2,500 5,000 feet —Existing County Trails City Data:http://gis.pearlandtx.gov/webl,Additional Data:TxDOT,FBA,Brazona County,and H-GAC;and Aerial imagery:www.nearmap.corn 0 Phase III(10-15 years;2030-2035) Existing Trailheads =Sidewalk both sides of road Existing Bridges —Sidewalk on one side of road Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs To expand the connectivity of active transportation facilities within the City of Pearland,additional sidewalks are needed either where none exist or where facilities require widening per the widths illustrated in Fig- ures 7A-D,Proposed Street Sections,on pages 45-46.The Proposed Sidewalks Order of Magnitude Costs,shown on pages 53-58,is arranged by the Principal Corridors(refer to pages 5-12)with the con- struction timeframe set by the Thoroughfare Reconstruction Phasing Plan(Map 15,page 42).Sidewalk widths are provided by the Proposed Street Sections and the cost was derived from the unit/aggregate cost breakdown of the Sidewalk and Trail Construction Details and lllustratives,described and illustrat- ed in Figure 8A-C on pages 59-60. The proposed costs use current 2020-dollar values and include a 10 percent contingency increase which takes into the consideration that construction may commence within an unknown future date.An additional 15 percent fee is also added to account for professional services fees(soft costs).i.e.,surveying,design and construction administration associated with construction recommendations.Although the sidewalks are adjacent to streets,the costs do not include curb ramps,vehicular signage,pavement markings(e.g.,cross- walks),trailheads,or other amenities. Table 5A,Proposed Sidewalks WEST to EAST Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs West to East Corridors Shadow Creek Parkway,from FM 521 to SH 288. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map1 Existing Proposed 1 Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If)1 Total Cost A 0-5 years 0 I 10 1 10.000 200,000 $100 051,000,000 Subtotal $1,000,000 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timehame Is not included within Grand Total Brookside Road from Cullen Boulevard to Mykawa Road. Sidewalk on north side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key 1 Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) 1 Unit Cost(If) Total Cost B 10-15 years 0 10 18,570 185,700 $100 $1,857.000 Subtotal $1,857,000 McHard Road,from Mykawa Road to Old Alvin Drive. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed 1 Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) 1 Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost C 10-15 years 0 1 10 10,950 219,000 . $100 $1,095.000 Subtotal $1,095,000 53 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN 1 Table 5A, Proposed Sidewalks WEST to EAST Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs (continued) West to East Corridors McHard Road and Pearland Parkway,from Old Alvin Drive to Hidden Glen Lane. Sidewalk on south side of the road only. Map, Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed (If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost D 0-5 years 0 10 3,456 34,560 $100 *$345,600 • Subtotal $345,600 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Hughes Ranch Road,from Smith Ranch Road to Cullen Boulevard. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) l Width (ft) Proposed (If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost E 0-5 years 0 8 21,400 342,400 $100 12,140,000 Subtotal $2,140,000 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Broadway Street(FM 518),from Pearland Town Center entrance to SH288. Sidewalk on south side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost F 0-5 years 0 10 2,537 25,374 $100 *$253,740 Subtotal $253,740 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Broadway Street(FM 518),from Smith Ranch Road to Cullen Parkway. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost G 0-5 years 0 10 23,540 470,800 $100 *$2,354,000 Subtotal $2,354,000 ' Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Broadway Street(FM 518),from Cullen Parkway to Railroad Tracks. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost H 5-10 years 0 10 40,356 807,120 $100 $4,035,600 Subtotal $4,035,600 ADOPTED January 11,2021 54 Table 5A, Proposed Sidewalks WEST to EAST Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs (continued) West to East Corridors Broadway Street(FM 518),from Railroad Tracks to Old Alvin Drive. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost I 10-15 years 0 10 3,254 65,080 $100 $325,400 Subtotal $325,400 Broadway Street(FM 518),from Pearland Parkway to Drainage Ditch. Sidewalk on southwest side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost J 0-5 years 0 10 7,212 72,120 $100 *$721,200 Subtotal $721,200 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Bailey Road,from Silverlake Parkway to Manvel Road. Sidewalk on south side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed i Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost K 0-5 years 0 10 23,160 231,600 $100 12,316,000 Subtotal $2,316,000 ' Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Bailey Road,from Veterans Drive to Wells Drive. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map 1 Existing Proposed Proposed 1 Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost L 0-5 years 0 10 5,400 108,000 $100 *$540,000 Subtotal $540,000 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Bailey Road I Oiler Drive,from Wells Drive to Pearland Parkway. Sidewalk on south side of the road only. Map 1 Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe i Width(ft) I Width (ft) Proposed (If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost M 0-5 years 0 10 5,919 59,190 $100 *$591,900 Subtotal $591,900 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total 55 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 5B, Proposed Sidewalks NORTH to SOUTH Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs North to South Corridors Smith Ranch Road,from McHard Road to Hughes Ranch Road. Sidewalk on west side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost N 5-10 years 0 10 4,964 49,640 $100 $496,400 Subtotal $496,400 Smith Ranch Road,from Hughes Ranch Road to Broadway Street(FM 518). Sidewalk on west side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost O 0-5 years 0 10 5,453 54,530 $100 *$545,300 Subtotal $545,300 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Cullen Parkway,from Broadway Street(FM 518)to Magnolia Road(CR 59). Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost P 10-15 years 0 10 12,800 256,000 $100 $1,280,000 Subtotal $1,280,000 Reid Road,from Brookside Road to Hughes Ranch Road. Sidewalk on west side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width (ft) Proposed (If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost Q 5-10 years 0 10 4,326 43,260 $100 $432,600 Subtotal $432,600 Harkey Road,from Broadway Street(FM 518)to Bailey Road. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost R 5-10 years 0 10 10,350 207,000 $100 $1,035,000 Subtotal $1,035,000 ADOPTED January 11,2021 56 Table 5B, Proposed Sidewalks NORTH to SOUTH Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs (continued) North to South Corridors Mykawa Road,from Clear Creek/City Limits to Broadway Street(FM 518). Sidewalk on west side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost S 0-5 years 0 10 12,239 244,780 $100 *$1,223,900 Subtotal $1,223,900 ' Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Old Alvin Road,from Knapp Road to McHard Road. Sidewalk on east side of the road only. Map 1 Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe , Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost T 0-5 years 0 10 3,046 30,456 $100 *$304,562 Subtotal $304,562 * Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Old Alvin Drive,from McHard Road to E.Orange Street. Sidewalks on both sides of the road. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost U 5-10 years 0 10 9,540 190,800 $100 $954,000 Subtotal $954,000 Old Alvin Drive,from E.Orange Street to Broadway Street(FM 518). Sidewalk on east side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost ✓ 5-10 years 0 10 2,655 26,550 $100 $265,500 Subtotal $265,500 Old Alvin Drive,from Broadway Street(FM 518)to Pearland Parkway,via John Lizer Road. Sidewalk on east side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost W 10-15 years 0 10 10,611 106,110 $100 $1,061,100 Subtotal $1,061,100 57 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 5C, Proposed Sidewalks SOUTHWEST to NORTHEAST Corridors Order of Magnitude Costs Southwest to Northeast Corridors McHard Road,from Pearland Parkway to Clear Creek/City Limits. Sidewalk on west side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost X 0-5 years 0 10 4,601 46.010 $100 *$460,100 Subtotal $460,100 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Hughes Road,from Pearland Parkway to City Limits. Sidewalk on south side of the road only Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width(ft) Width(ft) Proposed(If) (sf) ' Unit Cost(If) Total Cost Y 0-5 years 0 10 4,875 48,750 $100 *$487,500 Subtotal $487,500 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Pearland Parkway,from Broadway Street(FM 518)to Oiler Drive.. Sidewalk on east side of the road only. Map Existing Proposed Proposed Key Timeframe Width (ft) Width (ft) Proposed(If) (sf) Unit Cost(If) Total Cost Z 0-5 years 0 10 7,212 72,120 $100 *$721,200 Subtotal $721,200 • Total Cost of sidewalks within 0-5 year timeframe is not included within Grand Total Findings The total order of magnitude costs for sidewalks along Principal Corridors are as follows: — West to East Corridors: $17,575,440 (65%) — North to South Corridors: $7,598,362 (28%) — Southwest to Northeast Corridors: $1,668,800 (6%) Final Grand Total: $26,842,602 The total costs per Sidewalk Phasing Program are as follows: — Roadway construction within 10-15 years: $5,618,500 (21%) — Roadway construction within 5-10 years: $7,219,100 (27%) — Roadway construction within 0-5 years: $14,005,002 (52%) ADOPTED January 11,2021 58 tri Sidewalk and Trail Construction Figures 8A-C, Sidewalk and Trail Construction Detail and Illustratives, illustrates the standard side- walk detail from the City of Pearland Standard Construction Details.The detail specifies sidewalk construc- tion using 3,500 PSI compressive strength concrete; reinforcement to be#4 rebar @ 18" spacings in both directions; control joint spacing equal to the sidewalk width running the length of the sidewalk; expansion joints spaced at 16-foot intervals, a two percent slope towards the street; and all new sidewalks shall be doweled into any adjacent concrete structures. The sidewalks and trails unit cost as indicated in the Future Sidewalks and Future Trails Order of Magni- tude Costs includes materials and labor, demolition, site preparation, grading and drainage for a complete and installed concrete sidewalk. Figure 8A, Sidewalk and Trail Construction Detail and Illustratives Construction Details MIN.3' AS SPECIFIED 24' (4.-0 TYP.) 1-1/2' SLOPE 2% 3/8-R (TYP) TOWARD 2%TO 8% 1-1/4'-1/2' 1/4--1/2'- kilt] !'Mt] 3500 P51 COMPRESSIVE CONTROL JOINT STRENGTH CONCRETE (SIDEWALK CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE GROOVED 1/2-DEEP ON 4'CENTERS) 6'SELECT FILL 95%MAX. DRY DENSITY SECTION EXPANSION JOINT 4'-0- 4'-0' (SPACED 0 16'rm.) I (TYP) I ) PLAN 1 2' NOTES: /{RE1NF.O 18-SPACING, I. ALL EDGES SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH 3/8-RADIUS. CONTINUOUS EACH WAY. SPA'REDWOOD 16' EYRAINTERVAL JOISTS SHALL SPACED AT 16' INTERVAL OR AS OTHERWISE 2. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT INTERVALS SAME AS WIDTH OF SPECIFIED. SIDEWALK. 3. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE 1/2'DEEP AND TROWEL EDGE. CONTROL JOINT EXPANSION JOINT 4. 1/2'EXPANSION MATERIAL REQUIRED WHERE SIDEWALKS ABUT BUILDINGS, CURBS, DRIVEWAYS,OR EXISTING SIDEWALKS. 5. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 16 FT.INTERVALS TYPICALLY. 6. WHERE NEW SIDEWALK IS PLACED AGAINST EXISTING SIDEWALK, SAWCUT EXISTING SIDEWALK FULL DEPTH TO AN EVEN STRAIGHT UNE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE NEW SIDEWALK. 7. ALL NEW SIDEWALK SHALL BE DOWELED INTO ADJACENT CONCRETE STRUCTURES. 59 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI- MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Figure 8B, Sidewalk and Trail Illustrative Construction Detail Concrete Trail Illustrative • , • • W 2'-a' SHOULDER V a I.R oc yucca Licr SHOULDER 10'•0' w s.ccf,.no..a a.ca 2 =U n B:1 _ 1 0% 1.096 MAX a CONCRETE TRAIL 1 Decomposed Granite Trail Illustrative • • •l'�.. -fir: �' r z-0r 2'-cT SHOULDER SHOULDER 10-0' ay$60,0oua14OO"' U JL afi aJ�'. 11 1 mAx DECOMPOSED GRANITE/CONCRETE EDGE ADOPTED January 11,2021 60 Proposed Trails and Trailheads As depicted in Map 19, Proposed Trails and Trailheads, and summarized in part in the Pearland Trail Master Plan(2007)several significant trails,trail extensions, and trailheads have been planned to traverse the City,from west to east. Table 6, Proposed Trails and Order of Magnitude Costs Map Proposed Proposed Unit Cost Key To-From (If) (sf) (If) Total Cost 1 Shadow Creek Parkway to Shadow Creek Ranch Trail 1,105 11,050 $100 $110,500 I 2 Windward Bay Drive to Shadow Ridge Lane 1,686 16,860 $100 $168,600 3 Southlake Boulevard to Old Airline Road-North 5,628 56,280 $100 $562,800 4 Southlake Boulevard to Old Airline Road-South 5,396 53,960 $100 $539,600 5 W.Smith Ranch Road to Fair Oak Street 1,178 11,780 $100 $117,800 6 Magnolia Parkway to Northfork Drive 5,237 52,370 $100 $523,700 7 Future Brookside Road to north City Limits 2,234 22,340 $100 $223,400 8 Pearland Dad's Club to Future Brookside Road 11,661 116,610 $100 $1,166,100 9 Bailey Avenue to Magnolia Parkway 5.314 53,140 $100 $531,400 10 Bailey Avenue to Aubrel Road 2,142 21,420 $100 $214,200 11 Drainage Ditch adjacent to Hatfield Road to Magnolia Road 5,202 52,020 $100 $520,200 12 Drainage ditch in Willowick Subdivision to Centennial Park 1,432 14,320 $100 $143,200 13 Intersection of N. Main Street and E.Orange Street to drainage ditch 973 9,730 $100 $97,300 14 East Broadway Street to Old Alvin Road 1,094 10,940 $100 $109,400 15 E.Walnut Street to Baker's Landing Trail adjacent to S. Main Street 941 9,410 $100 $94,100 16 Old Alvin Road to Pearland Parkway adjacent to Mary's Creek 3,096 30,960 $100 $309,600 17 Pearland Parkway to Mary's Creek adjacent to John Lizer Road 1,150 11,500 $100 $115,000 18 Pearland Parkway to Long Oak Drive 1,474 14,740 $100 $147,400 19 John Lizer Road to Province Village Drive adjacent to Liberty Drive 4,124 41,240 $100 $412,400 20 Pearland Parkway to Country Club Drive adjacent to E.Broadway Street 2,734 27,340 $100 $273,400 21 Clear Creek to Riverstone Ranch Subdivision Trail 2,127 21,270 $100 $212,700 22 E. Orange Street to drainage ditch adjacent to Bary Rose Road 556 5,560 $100 $55,600 23 Pearland Parkway to Clear Creek 1,900 19,000 $100 $190,000 61 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN y MAP 19, PROPOSED TRAILS 16 AND TRAILHEADS --- -- } i -_�"-``.�i- ''` 17 January 11,2021 AsmBrA , ,,,,,,w1 r'�_ _. '�w.N rid! N`-A.,-. a ›. ! -_.- �, — �.- `-�•r --- -___ __ n -7 R.18 �y— , it \\, .6 -.� i I' ems", _i Or _ -- 13 24 v 26 p r+w cam 4 2 3 ! r,m 28 35� 37 ©••• ry •S ice. '.��;,4,,:,,,-;,:. .......,/ ru•1•QP_ _ 7F 1, i ■ SS •� „ r 11. y . --t°1-1 ------------------*I , �....j 0 32��.._a / L_.. ,, 1: —'' '....""----'- ". "[''sr...Z.V.,r;'?' 11 - _ . LII II LEGEND ---Proposed Trails(2007) Existing Sidewalks .•■Proposed Trails(2020) Existing 10-ft-wide Sidewalk Proposed 8-ft.Sidewalks —Existing City Trails r_Proposed 10-ft.Sidewalks Existing Subdivision Trails 0 2,500 5,000 feet *,/`OMajor(Type 1)/Minor(Type 2) —Existing County Trails City Data.http://gis.pearlandtx.govlwebl,Additional Data:TxDOT,FEMA,Brazoria County.and H-GAC;and Aerial imagery.www.nearmap.com O Proposed Trailheads • Existing Trailheads • Proposed Bridges 0 Existing Bridges 0 Proposed Under Bridge Crossing Proposed Trailheads In conjunction with proposed new trails,as well as where existing and proposed sidewalks along principal thoroughfares are in dose proximity to existing and proposed trails,several additional trailheads are rec- ommended.Two types of trailheads are proposed,a Major(Type 1)that costs$344,050 per trailhead and a Minor(Type 2)that cot$23,750 per trail head.See Table 7,below,for a breakdown of these costs. Major(Type 1)trailheads are proposed for areas where there is ample room to include off-street concrete parking lots(curb and gutter)with up to seven parking spaces(including one handicapped space),a curb ramp and curb cuts,two street lights,directional-wayfinding signage,landscape enhancements(up to three large trees),a shade structure with two benches,waste receptacle,recycling receptacle,and drinking foun- tain.Minor(Type 2)trailheads will include a shade structure with one bench,waste receptacle,recycling receptacle,directional-wayfinding signage,and modest landscape enhancements(up to three medium trees). Major(Type 1)costs$344,050 per trailhead and a Minor(Type 2)costs$23,750 per trail head.See Table 7,below,for a breakdown of these costs.Table 8,on the facing page,lists the proposed trailheads,the type of trailhead,and total costs. Table 7,Breakdown of Costs for Each Type of Proposed Trallhead *Major Q Minor a.' Trailhead Trallhead (Type 1) (Type 2) Trailhead signage $5,200.00 $5,200.00 ro ' Wayfinding signage I $2,000.00 $2,000.00 - <'Pe Group of 3 large trees $1 350.00 (1 unit=$450)j - ' I Group of 3 medium trees i $1,050 ..._.....(1 unit=$350) +.;.h ... Landscaping $1,000.00 $1,000.00 . Land grading $50,000.0 - Street lights(1 unit $3,750) $7,500.00 $3,750.00 ench I (1 unit $8750)i $3,500.00 $1,750.00 Shade structure '` $15,000.00 $7,500.00 $4000 00 Drinking fountain - ,1 Recycle receptacle $750.00 $750.00 iimmena war cY Trash receptacle $750.00 $750.00 &: - p, (1 unit C= R$1.500)'. $3,000 Paved parking area $250,000.00 (7 spaces) ..., TOTAL $344,050.00 $23,750.00 7 63 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table 8, Proposed Trailheads and Order of Magnitude Costs Major(Type 1) Total Cost © Minor(Type 2) Total Cost 1 The Sports Complex at SCR 3 Reflection Bay Recreation Center at SCR 2 Shadow Creek Ranch 5 Ivy Park at Lower Kirby District 4 Pearland Town Center 6 Southdown Park 7 Westside Event Center 8 Silverlake Village Shopping Center 10 Tom Bass Park 9 Clarence E.Sasser Park 13 Hickory Slough Sportsplex 11 Christa V.Adair 15 Mary's Creek on Manvel Road 12 Southwyck on Magnolia Parkway 17 Clear Creek at Mykawa Road 14 Rogers Middle School 20 Corrigan-Woody Parks 16 Clear Creek at S.Wayside Drive $344,050.00 21 Recreation Center and Natatorium 18 Garden Road $23,750.00 25 Hunter Park 19 Hatfield Road 26 Clear Creek at Pearland Parkway 22 Clear Creek at Wheatridge Street 28 Province Village Park 23 Univerity of Houston at Clear Lake 29 Independence Park 24 Town Ditch Trail 30 Mary's Creek at Liberty Drive 27 YMCA 31 City Hall 32 Mary's Creek Lane ('33 Cowart Creek at Pearland Parkway 34 Clear Creek at Golfcrest I 37 Dixie Farm Road Park 35 Clear Creek at Golfcrest II 18 Major(Type 1)Trailheads= $6,192,900.00 36 Clear Creek at Scarsdale Boulevard 19 Minor(Type 2)Trailheads= $451,250.00 37 Total Trailheads = $6,644,150.00 ADOPTED January 11,2021 64 Active Transportation Network: Existing and Proposed Map 20, Active Transportation Network, illustrates all existing sidewalks, trails (city and subdivision), proposed sidewalks, and proposed trails and trailheads. Notable trails that traverse the city are described below and are highlighted in pink on Map 20 (trails include existing connections in order to illustrate the full length of the future trail): Clear Creek Trail. The trail alignment is currently in design and will soon be constructed along Clear Creek,from the Lower Kirby District eastward to El Franco Lee Park, south to the Preserve at Highland Glen Trails and ending at Independence Park. © Hickory Slough Trail.A trail extension is planned to run from the Autumn Lakes Trail eastward along the Hickory Slough, connecting to Houston Memorial Gardens and Paradise Cemetery, and beyond, to the Hickory Slough Sportsplex. © Mary's Creek Trail Extension.Beginning at a new trailhead at SH 288,a new trail will extend down the Centerpoint Transmission easement to connect with Mary's Creek and will run eastward, connecting to the existing Mary's Creek Trail at the John Hargrove Environmental Complex. The trail will continue along Mary's Creek and connect with the Centennial Park Trail, before heading northward along the railroad. 65 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MAP 20, 1726 288 ?Il ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION r�.�+� Clear Creek Tail NETWORK n -� --•--. ,-.ir+' _ January 11,2021 -y. _ -- Clear Creek Trail I. "fiir .-✓ ICY O , 1 ------------- 4 TT If f �.s I% I. F Hickory Slough • d2,'1 e.1, ` y r' . .. . --- Clear Creek Trail +aAC, * `fit-�i .� `. CM * *, a.. / j ( ;.,, • i...� ... ri _w ihiw.(. r P. •x- 5• : Mary Creek j 'll �,t s 31.1 :' / •'� _� r-` ,,.• _ Mays k 'Y t '.... _ I - +e-`a`• ' ,., p- ,,��-,.. * 3 _:..ram* .., r� S�°- !y 3 "_- , a%�`., •:..., , �. 1 a Fes. — wet . ,• / rr>l..mrtae ` _ a.W NO:flt qi'. �a Nwem�n r I L.--. rl M w:m N:/e7 y4,.. ..,. -I. El 4,.. / Am., B �... y.? ,,Ie t tt i i +t,r, / vkl°‘ 1 ue.. � ' .o:.�:,,,.e, _ �_ 0 LEGEND -. Proposed Trails(2007) --Existing Sidewalks . .Notable Proposed Trails aa./..Existing 10-ft.wide Sidewalk ......Proposed Trails(2020) Existing City Trails —Proposed 8-ft.Sidewalks —Existing Subdivision Trails maw Proposed 10-ft.Sidewalks 0 2,500 5,000 feet —Existing County Trails 0 Proposed Trailheads City Data:http://gis.pearlandtx.gov/web/.Additional Data:TxDOT,FEMA,Brazona County.and H-GAC.and Aerial imagery.www.nearmap.com 04. Existin g Trailheads * Proposed Bridges Existing Bridges 0 Proposed Under Bridge Crossin. Active Transportation Implementation Strategies and Recommendations Implementing an Enhanced Active Transportation Level of Service MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 1:Adopt Proposed Street Sections. Amend Chapter 6,Roadway Design Criteria,of the City's Engineering Design Criteria Manual(December 2018)to include the Proposed Street Sections,as illustrated in Figures 7A-D,on pages 45-46 of this report for all prioritized thoroughfares identified in Map 3,Principal Corridors(page 6). INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. Amend Division 11 —Sidewalks and Alleys,of Chapter 3,Subdivision Regulations,within the City's Unified Development Code(UDC),to require sidewalks along all thoroughfares within an 80 ft.wide right-of-way,to be a minimum of eight feet wide;with the objective of having facilities on both sides of the thoroughfare,with ample room of street trees and other furnishings,including signage,bollards, benches,public transit stops(refer to Strategy 8),etc. 2. Amend Division 11 —Sidewalks and Alleys,of Chapter 3,Subdivision Regulations,within the City's Unified Development Code(UDC),to require sidewalks along all thoroughfares within a 100 ft.wide right-of-way,to be a minimum of 10 feet wide,on both sides of the thoroughfare. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 2: Improve connectivity between neighborhood sidewalks and municipal pedestrian facilities. Amend Division 11—Sidewalks and Alleys,of Chapter 3,Subdivision Regulations,within the City's Unified Development Code(UDC),to require sidewalks on both sides of entrance roads leading-in to residential subdivisions from collector streets,to be a minimum of six feet wide(compared to current four foot width). MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 3:Align sidewalk improvements with the City's thoroughfare reconstruction program. As illustrated within Map 15, Thoroughfare Construction Phasing Program(page 42), the City has developed a thoroughfare reconstruction phasing program for many of its principal west to east and north to south thoroughfares.This has significantly informed the Proposed Sidewalk Phasing Program(refer to Map 17,page 50).It will be important for the City to take advantage of its thoroughfare reconstruction projects to phase-in construction of additional active transportation facilities. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 4:Establish sidewalk implementation partnerships. Establish partnerships with the Independent School Districts(ISDs)and developers whereby with all new development(i.e.,new schools,new residential subdivisions),the development entity will be responsible for constructing the portion of sidewalk identified within Map 17,Proposed Sidewalk Phasing Program. 67 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 5:Establish sidewalk connection partnerships. Amend Chapter 3, Subdivision Regulations, of the City's Unified Development Code to include a require- ment whereby all new development must provide pedestrian connections to adjacent trails and municipal pedestrian facilities (sidewalks), both existing and proposed. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 6: Develop a phased trail expansion program. In conjunction with the trail improvements identified within Table 6, Proposed Trails and Order of Mag- nitude Costs, develop a phased trail expansion program. Consider the proposed trail furnishings and landscape sitework enhancements, extensions and connections identified within the Pedestrian Level of Service(PLOS)Remedial Recommendations, and as illustrated in Map 19, Proposed Trails(page 62). MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 7: To improve accessibility to trails and widened sidewalks, consider where additional trailheads may be located. As indicated on Map 19, Future Trails(page 62), in conjunction with proposed new trails, as well as where existing and proposed sidewalks along principal thoroughfares are in close proximity to existing and pro- posed trails, several additional trailheads are recommended. INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. In conjunction with the development of the new animal shelter on Old Alvin Road, construct a trailhead and parking lot to provide additional access to the Town Ditch Trail. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 8: Begin to plan pedestrian improvements associated with a future public transit program. In anticipation of subsequent phases of this Multi-Modal Master Plan, begin to plan where potential pe- destrian improvements may be located to facilitate the future development of a municipal public transit system of bus routes along principal corridors. INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. Design a prototypical bus transit stop to determine area (footprint) requirements and how these bus stops would be integrated into the sidewalks and streetscapes of principal intersections and other in- termittent mid-block bus stops along a potential route. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 9:Provide safe access to Pearland's parks from adjacent neighborhoods. Provide safe access to Pearland's parks from adjacent neighborhoods. through implementing crosswalk improvement standards at principal thoroughfare intersections and mid-block crossings, where applicable; including cross walk striping, signage, curb cuts and ADA-accessible ramps, and pedestrian-activated sig- nal changing push buttons (at signalized intersections). As identified within both the Park Conditions Assessment(Appendix A of the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan) and the Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS)Assessment, few of the ADOPTED January 11,2021 68 i mic#._ city's parks have safe routes across streets to enable pedestrians to reach parks from adjacent residential neighborhoods. Safe pedestrian crossings should be developed to limit the number of places where people cross streets;as well as locate pedestrian crossings to places where vehicles are either slowing or stopping (i.e., intersections). INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. Refer to the PLOS Remedial Recommendations and Opportunities for Improvement figures in Appendix B for recommended locations of pedestrian crossings. 2. Utilizing the NRPA's Safe Routes to Parks Action Framework, conduct a safe routes to parks audit for the City's parks and implement improvements to the park and adjacent streets(both within and outside the park) based on the following criteria: enhanced park design, street design, park amenities, ADA compliance, signage and wayfinding, and maintenance practices. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 10: Continue to utilize the U.S. Department of Transportation's (USDOT) Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) Program and Guide (guide.saferoutesinfo.org) to identify and evaluate preferred routes for children to take when walking or cycling to school. Utilize the USDOT's eight-step program to engage members of the community in gathering information, identifying issues, and formulating solutions to ensure that children can walk to school safely. Develop a plan, fund the plan, and implement the plan. INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. Apply for funding through the USDOT's SRTS program for specific sidewalk and trail improvements to connect schools with neighborhoods. 2. Over the next 15-20 years, strive to ensure that Pearland's schools are all connected to the City's net- work of eight-foot-wide and 10-foot-wide sidewalks and trails. 3. Partner with Alvin ISD, Pearland ISD, and Houston ISD in the development and implementation of safe and connected sidewalks and trails. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 11:Develop a cost-effective and efficient program for providing lighting along primary trails and sidewalks. During the summer months it is often too hot to walk along trails and sidewalks, particularly along reaches of trail that are predominantly in full sun. Many people wait until after dinner to take a walk; after the sun has set and it is cooler outside. Providing lighting for some sidewalks and trails can increase safe evening use;and provide visual cues regarding function(i.e.,spine or secondary sidewalk),orientation and legibility. INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. Develop a suite of light fixture selection criteria for standard-mounted and bollard-mounted fixtures, to ensure standardization of operation and maintenance. 2. Consider a solar-powered fixture, to reduce the need for installation of conduit. 69 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 12:Implement reforestation projects throughout the City of Pearland, includ- ing its parks and trails. As discussed within the Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS), Appendix B, assessment of Pearland's trails, many trails extend for miles in the full sun. Trail users can remain fully exposed to harsh summer conditions; which can result in extreme fatigue and dehydration. The City's stormwater detention and con- veyance facilities, including detention basins and drainage sloughs, while attractive and well-maintained - many of which have perimeter trails and other pedestrian facilities - remain totally exposed to the sun. Reforestation of these stormwater facilities will reduce solar exposure; promote breezes; reduce ambient temperatures, especially in the hot summer months; improve ecosystem services and habitat value; se- quester greenhouse gas emissions; and ultimately enhance the general character of the City's residential areas by turning drainage facilities into significant open space amenities. INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS 1. Work with the City's Urban Forester to develop reforestation plans for parks, trails, and stormwater detention and conveyance facilities. 2. Partner with the Brazoria Drainage District No. 4 to amend drainage facility maintenance responsibili- ties; whereby the City of Pearland assumes increased maintenance (lawn mowing, etc.) responsibility for a 200 ft. right-of-way, centered on recreational trails, and for portions of stormwater detention basin embankments; in order to plant and maintain trees in the these areas. 3. Develop metrics to quantify reforestation of the city's open space areas, including number of trees planted, acres of new forest, tons of greenhouse gases sequestered, etc. MULTI-MODAL STRATEGY 13:Install pedestrian refuges along the City's recreational trails. The Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS), Appendix B, assessment identified several trails that needed interim way stations along the route, where trail users could stop and rest, in a shaded environment. As illustrated in Figure B.1, Pedestrian Refuge, it is recommended that clusters of three trees be planted in a triangular pattern, spanning the trail, adjacent to which would be a bench and a lighted bollard,that latter of which would function as a beacon in the evening hours, and provide small pools of light to guide one along the trail. Some pedestrian refuges may have a drinking fountain to ensure people do not get dehydrated. Additional features may include sunscreen dispensers. Pedestrian refuges would be evenly spaced along a trail, perhaps every 1,000 linear feet or so, to ensure adequate protection during the summer months. ADOPTED January 11,2021 70 c' *.,, Page left blank intentionally 71 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN NVId 2131SV1N IVOOW-I1lfiW ONVl21V3d dO A110 VV - — 2,-2- lailliallirlitifilMailaillarra- - , • " - ' •..ram-.- 71+'.�++--r-ap�� .-9, '_?s+7l t i • • i .....7..,....,,. ..maimmiimilminiolo s f _ - „ I1 I t� -i R� • I t 1- I~,-��` r ""''�'------- . ,..rti i i,,, '. • Ilk l..Ar ? . * • '• . xiaN3ddV 415 . / • ..1.4 1,..._--'-.Iv ... i.„- ... v„,... .„, .„...,,. . 4.: 0, '4- .-r.' ' - ,, t.. , NV1d ?J21SVVJ lvaovJ- InnlPJ ,. ,.,,,._ -Il Table A.1, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Afton Dr Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N Alexander Ln Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Alexander Ridge Ln Hughes Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Alexander Ridge Ln Hughes Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Anthony Ln Broadway St 120'Major N N N Anzac Dr Trail Trail N N—accessible Apple Springs Dr McLean Rd 60'Major Incomplete N Y Apple Springs Dr McLean Rd 60'Major Incomplete N N Apple Springs Dr Potential Trails Arbor Cr Potential Trail Trail N N Arwady View Ln Fite Rd 80'Major Incomplete N N Ashford Bridge Ln County Rd 59 100'Secondary N N N Ashton Park Dr Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Attiva Pearland Potential Trail Attiva Pearland Potential Trail Auburn Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Audubon PI Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary N N N Autumn Forest Dr Trail Trail N N—accessible Autumn Lake Trail Miller Ranch Rd Neighborhood N N N Autumn Leaves of Pearland Discovery Bay Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Avalon Manor Ln Reid Rd 120' Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Avalon Way Reid Rd 120'Major Incomplete N N Avenues at SCR Broadway St 120' Major Sidewalks N Y Avenues at SCR Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Avenues at SCR Trail Trail N N Avion SCR by Cortland MF Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete N—accessible Avion SCR by Cortland MF Shadow Creek Pkwy 120' Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Bailey Ave Trail Trail N N—accessible Banbury Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Bare Sky Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Barrington Way Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N—accessible Barrington Way Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N—accessible Becky Ln Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Becky Ln Aubrell Rd Neighborhood N N N Bedford Ave Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA_AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.2 Table A.2, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk' Ramps Bella Vita Dr Scarsdale Blvd 120'Major N N N Belmore Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Bestin Oaks Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Bigallo Dr Scarsdale Blvd 120'Major Incomplete N N—accessible Black Forest Way Hughes Ranch Rd 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Bluestone Edge Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Bluestone Edge Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Bluestone Edge Ln Trail Trail N Y Brazoria PI Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Brazos Bend Dr Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Brazos Bend Dr Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Brentwood Ln Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Bristol Breeze Dr Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Broadway Bend Dr Broadway St 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Broadway St Potential Trail Brookdale Pearland Scarsdale Blvd 120'Major N N N Brownstone Place Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N Bryon Ave Broadway St 120' Major N Incomplete N Buckeye Ln Fite Rd 60'Minor Sidewalks N N Bui Dr Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Butler Rd Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Butler Rd Oday Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N—accessible Cabot Cove Dr McLean Rd 80'Major Incomplete Incomplete N—accessible Camelots Ct Miller Ranch Rd Neighborhood N N N Campbell Dr McLean Rd 60'Minor Sidewalks N N—accessible Canyon Springs Dr Trail Trail N N—accessible Caprock Dr Potential Trail Cardinal Bluff Ct CR 59 100'Secondary N N N Carmona Ln Hartfield Rd 60' Minor N N N Carson Ave Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Cedar Hill Dr Potential Trails Cedar Hill Dr Potential Trail Cedar Hollow Dr Trail Trail N N—accessible Cedar St W Orange St 80' Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Centennial Village Dr Fite Rd 80' Major Sidewalks N N—accessible 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.3 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.3, Subdivision Entrance Inventoy Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Cheif Potential Trails Cherry Creek Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Cherry St Woody Rd 60'Minor Incomplete N N Cherry St Mykawa Rd 100'Secondary N N N Cherry St Mykawa Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Cheryl Dr E Orange St 60'Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y Chester Dr Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Chrissie Dr McLean Rd 60'Mionr Sidewalks N N—accessible Cliff Stone Rd Stone Rd 80'Major N N N Cliff Stone Rd Reid Rd 120'Major N N N Cliff Stone Rd Reid Rd 120'Major N N N Colleen Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Incomplete N Y Colleen Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Colmesneil Dr Hartfield Rd 60'Minor N N N Colonial Dr McLean Rd 80'Major N N N Comal St Woody Rd 80' Major N N N Confederate Dr McLean Rd 80' Major N N N Conroe Lake Ct Potential Trail Corrigan Dr Broadway St 120' Major Incomplete Incomplete N—accessible Cottonwood St Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Cottonwood St Aubrell Rd Neighborhood N N N Country Meadows Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Country Place Blvd McHard Rd 120'Major N Incomplete Y Country Place Blvd McHard Rd 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Country Place Blvd McHard Rd 120' Major N Incomplete Y Country Place Blvd McHard Rd 120' Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Country Place Pkwy Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Crosswind Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Crystal Lake Circle Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary N N N Crystal Lake Dr Cullen Blvd 120'Major Incomplete N Y Cullen Estates Dr Old Chocolate Bayou Rd 100'Secondary N N N Cunningham Dr Woody Rd 60' Mionr Incomplete N N Cunningham Dr Woody Rd 60' Minor N N N Cunningham Dr Broadway St 120'Major N N N Dawson Dr Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Y Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.4 s ciiiiiy.. . ti;.re it Table A.4, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)z: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Dee Rd Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Dillard Dr Veterans Dr 100'Secondary N N N Discovery at SCR Business Center Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Discovery at SCR Business Center dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Dixie Farm Rd Potential Trails Dixie Hollow St Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Dogwood Dr Potential Trail Dove Shores Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Dryberry Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Dublin Ln Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Dublin Ln Oday Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N—accessible Duesenberg Dr Old Chocolate Bayou Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y E Circle Dr Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Y Y E Marys Creek Ln Marys Creek Trail Trail Trail Eagle Crest Ln Silverlake Pkwy 80' Major Sidewalks N Y Eastbury Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Elaine Way Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N—accessible Elder Grove Dr Potential Trail Trail N N Elm St W Orange St 80' Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Emerald Bay Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Y Y Enclave at Mary's Creek Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete N—accessible Enclave Lake Ln Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y English Lake Dr S Main St 120'Major N N N English Oaks Blvd Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y English Oaks Blvd Trail Trail N N—accessible Excaliburs Ct Miller Ranch Rd Neighborhood N N N Fite Rd Trail Trail Y Y Fite Rd Trail Trail Y Y Fite Rd Potential Trail Forest Park Ln Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Fortuna Dr Scarsdale Blvd 120'Major Incomplete N Y Francis Dr Woody Rd 60' Minor Incomplete N N Francis Dr Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N Freestone Ave Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Gardenia St Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;'Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.5 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.5, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Glastonbury Dr Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Incomplete N N Granite Trace Ln CR 59 100'Secondary N N N Green Tree Dr Country Club Dr 80'Major N N N Halbert Dr Woody Rd 60'Minor Incomplete N N Halbert Dr Broadway St 120'Major N N N Half Moon Bay Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y Hampshire St S Main St 120'Major N N N Hampshire St Old Alvin Rd 80' Major Sidewalks N N Hampshire St Old Alvin Rd 80' Major Incomplete N Y Harbor Ridge Hughes Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Harkey Rd Trail Trail N N—accessible Harkey Rd Trail Trail N N—accessible Harrington Dr Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary N N N Hartfield Rd Fite Rd 80'Major N N N Hartfield Rd Fite Rd 80'Major N N N Hartford Lakes Dr FM 521 Almeda Rd 120'Major N N N Hartford Landing Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N N Hawk Rd Cullen Blvd 120'Major Incomplete Y Y Heaton Rd Pearland Pkwy 120' Major Incomplete N N Heritage Green Dr Barry Rose Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Heron Ln Manvel Rd 120' Major N N N Heron Ln Potential Trail6 Trail N N Hickory Hollow Dr Oday Rd 80'Major Incomplete N N—accessible Hidden Bay Dr Potential Trail N N N Hidden Glen Ln Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Hidden Glen Ln Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Highland Gap Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Highland Park Dr Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Houston Lake Ct Potential Trail Hubbell Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Huisache Blvd John Lizer Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Indigo Point Ln Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Inverness Ln Dixie Farm Rd 120' Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Isla Dr E Orange St 60'Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y Jackson Ave CR 59 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HAAccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.6 Table A.6, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Jamison Landing Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Jasperstone Ln Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Jefferson St Potential Trails Jerrycrest Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Johnston St W Walnut St 80' Major N N N Johnston St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Josephine St Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Julie St Liberty Dr 80'Major Incomplete N Y Karen Way Oday Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Keithwood Cir St Trail Trail N N—accessible Keithwood Dr Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Kelly Ln Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Kensington Bridge Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Kensington Bridge Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y King Authors Ct Miller Ranch Rd Neighborhood N N N Kingsley Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kingsley Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kingsley Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kingsley Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kingsley Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kingsley Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kirby Dr Trail Trail Y Y Kirby Dr Trail Trail Y Y Knapp Rd Old Alvin Rd 80'Major N N N Knob Hill St Potential Trail Lakecrest Ln Cullen Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Larrycrest Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Larrycrest Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Laura Ln Liberty Dr 80'Major Incomplete N Y Laura Ln Liberty Dr 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Laurie St Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Lavaca Dr Bailey Rd 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Lawrence PI Bailey Ave 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Liberty Dr Marys Creek Trail Trail Trail Linwood Oak St E Orange St 60'Minor N N N 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.7 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.7, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk" Ramp' Linwood St E Orange St 60'Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y Linwood St Old Alvin Rd 80' Major Thoroughfare N N N Livingston Lake Ct Potential Trails London Ct Barry Rose Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Y Y Long Oak Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Longview Dr Longwood Dr 60'Mionr N N N Longwood Dr Broadway St 120' Major Incomplete Incomplete N Lynn Dr Woody Rd 60'Minor Incomplete N N Lynn Dr Broadway St 120'Major N N N Magnolia Crossing Ln Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Magnolia Estates Blvd Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Magnolia Oaks Dr Veterans Dr 100'Secondary N N N Magnolia Pines Dr Veterans Dr 100'Secondary N N N Mahogany Trail Potential Trail Trail N N Maple Harvest Ln Trail Trail N N Maryfield Blvd John Lizer Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N Maryfield Blvd John Lizer Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Marys Village Dr Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y Massey Lakes Manvel Rd 120'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible McDonald Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Incomplete Y Y McGinnis Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Incomplete Y Y McGinnis Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y McKinley Ct Potential Trail McKinley Ct Hartfield Rd 60' Minor Incomplete N N—accessible Meadow Green Dr Trail Trail Incomplete Y Meadow Ln Manvel Rd 120' Major N N N Meadow Ln Potential Trail Trail N N Meadowhurst Dr Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N N Megan St Hartfield Rd 80'Major Incomplete N Y Miller Ranch Rd Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary N N Ni Miller Ranch Rd Potential Trail N N N Miller Ranch Rd Broadway St 120'Major N N N Millican Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Millican Dr McLean Rd 80'Major N N N Millican Dr Potential Trail 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA_AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks',there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.8 Table A.8, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Millican Dr Potential Trail6 Misty Creek Ln Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Mockingbird Ln Potential Trail Trail N N Moray Dr Bailey Ave 120' Major N N N Morenci St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Morgan Rd Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Y Y Morgan Rd Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Incomplete Y Y Morning Brook Dr Potential Trail N N N Morning Dawn Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Morning Trail Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Moss Creek Ln Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Moss Lake Ln Potential Trail N N N Moss Lake Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible N Austin Ave W Orange St 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y N Austin Ave Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N N Galveston Ave E Orange St 60'Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y N Galveston Ave E Orange St 60' Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y N Grand Blvd Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete N N Grand Blvd E Orange St 60'Minor Sidewalks Incomplete Y N Hampton Dr Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N N Houston Ave Broadway St 120'Major N Incomplete N N Houston Ave E Orange St 60'Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y N Pearland Ave W Orange St 80' Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y N Pearland Ave Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N Neches River Dr Fite Rd 80'Major N N N Noblewood Ct Trail Trail N N—accessible Norma Ln Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Northfork Dr Old Chocolate Bayou Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Y N—accessible Northfork Dr Old Chocolate Bayou Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete Y N—accessible Northfork Dr Manvel Rd 120'Major Incomplete N N Nottingham St Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Incomplete N Y Oak Brook Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Oak Forest St Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Oak Rd Broadway St 120'Major N N N Oak Rd Fite Rd 120'Major Incomplete N N 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA_AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.9 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.9, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Oak Ridge Dr Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Oakbridge Apt Homes Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Incomplete N N Oakbridge Apt Homes Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Incompete N N Oday Cir Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Oday Ct Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Old Airline Rd Trail Trail N N—accessible Old Airline Rd Trail Trail N N—accessible Old Alvin Rd Trail Trail N Y Old Oaks Blvd Trail Trail N N—accessible Old Oaks Blvd Trail Trail N N—accessible Old Oaks Blvd Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Olin Dr Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Orange Cir N Mykawa Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Orange Cir S Mykawa Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Orange St Schleider Dr 60'Minor Incomplete Incomplete Y Park Ave Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete N Park Ave Broadway St 120'Major N Incomplete N Park Ave E Orange St 60'Minor Sidewalks Incomplete Y Park Falls Dr Potential Trails N N N Park Place Blvd Silverlake Pkwy 80'Major Incomplete N N Parkview Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Incomplete N Y Parkview Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Parkview Dr Marys Creek Trail Trail Trail Parry Dr Potential Trail Parry Dr Potential Trail Patricia Ln Broadway St 120'Major N Incomplete N Patridge Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Patridge Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Patridge Rd Aubrell Rd Neighborhood N N N Patton Ln Harkey Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Peach Hollow Cir Potential Trail Trail N N Pear St Woody Rd 60' Minor N N N Pearland Heights Oday Rd 80' Major N N N Pearland Heights Oday Rd 80'Major N N N Pearland PI Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.10 a.r tip"' Oc1), jok Table A.10, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Pearland PI Hartfield Rd 80'Major N N N Pearland Pkwy Trail Trail N N—accessible Pearland Pkwy Trail Trail N N—accessible Pearland Pkwy Trail Trail N N—accessible Pearland Pkwy Barry Rose Rd Trail Trail Y Y Pearland Pkwy Hughes Rd Trail Trail Y Y Pearland Village Apts Old Alvin Rd 80'Major N N N Pearland Village Apts Old Alvin Rd 80' Major N N N Pebble Brook Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Pebble Creek Dr Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Pilgrims Point Ln Barry Rose Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Pine Crest Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major N N N Pine Hollow Dr Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N Pine Valley Dr Broadway St 120'Major N N N Pinehill Dr E Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Pinehill Dr W Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Y Y Piper Rd Broadway St 120'Major N N N Piper Rd Fite Rd 80'Major N N N Poplar Grove Ln Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Preserve Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Primrose Canyon Ln Trail Trail N N—accessible Province Village Dr Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y Province Village Dr Country Club Dr 80' Major Incomplete N Y Quail Run Dr Bailey Ave 120'Major N N N Queen Victoria St Potential Trail' Quiet Pines Ln Old Airline Rd 120' Major Incomplete N Incomplete Quiet Pines Ln Old Airline Rd 120' Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Radius at SCR Discovery Bay Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N—accessible Radius at SCR Business Center Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Ravenwood Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N—accessible Ravenwood Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Ray St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Rayburn Lake Ct Potential Trail Rayburn Ln Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major N N N Raza Rd Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the Intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.11 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.11, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramps Redwood Bend Ln Potential Trail6 Trail N N Reflection Bay Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y Regal Oaks Dr Broadway St 120'Major N Incomplete N Regents Bay Dr Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Y Y Regents Bay Dr Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks Y Y Remington Apts Pearland Barry Rose Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Retreat at SCR Business Center Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Retreat at SCR Trail Trail N N—accessible Retreat at SCR Trail Trail N N—accessible Retreat at SCR Trail Trail N N—accessible Retreat at SCR Business Center Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N—accessible Rice Rd Oday Rd 80'Major Incomplete N N—accessible Rice Rd Biddie Wilbur Rd 80' Major Sidewalks N Y Rice Rd Biddie Wilbur Rd 80' Major N N N Rice Rd Woody Rd 80' Major N N N Riverside Dr Broadway St 120'Major N N N Riverstone Falls Dr Hughes Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Rockland Dr Hartfield Rd 60'Minor N N N Rocky Creek Ln Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Rocky Crest Ln Fite Rd 60'Minor Sidewalks N N Roland Rue St Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Rose Rd W Orange St 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Royal Oaks of Pearland Broadway St 120' Major N N N Ryan Acres Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary N N N S Austin Ave W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N S Austin Ave Broadway St 120' Major Incomplete N N—accessible S Grand Blvd Broadway St 120'Major N Incomplete N S Houston Ave Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete N S Pearland Ave W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N S Pearland Ave Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N S Sacramento Ave W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N S Sumac Trail Trail N N—accessible Sago Bay Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y San Antonio St W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N San Antonio St W Orange St 80' Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HAAccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks',there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,In some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.12 t ib: 4„.._,,,,;(; IP At Table A.12, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramps San Antonio St Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N San Antonio St Broadway St 120'Major N N N San Marino Dr Scarsdale Blvd 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Sapphire Bay Dr Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Schleider Dr Potential Trail6 Scott Ln Biddie Wilbur Rd 80'Major N N N Scott Ln Woody Rd 80'Major N N N Scott Ln Woody Rd 80' Major N N N Shadow Grove Ln Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Shadow Ridge Ln Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Shady Bend Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Shady Bend Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Shady Gate Ln Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Shadycrest Dr Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Incomplete N Y Shadycrest Dr Broadway St 120'Major N Y Y Shallow Creek Dr Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Sharondale St Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Shauntel St Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Sheila St Potential Trail Shelby Springs Dr Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Sidwalks Incomplete Y Sherwood St Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Y N Silsbee Dr McLean Rd 60' Minor N N N Silver Dr Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Silverlake Pkwy Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Y Y Skymist St Kirby Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Sleepy Hollow Dr Trail Trail Incomplete Y Sleepy Hollow Dr Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Somerville Lake Ct Potential Trail Songbird Dr Aubrell Rd Neighborhood N N N South Hatfield MHP Hatfield Rd 60'Minor Incomplete N N South Hatfield MHP Hatfield Rd 60'Minor Incomplete N N South Hatfield MHP Hatfield Rd 60' Minor Incomplete N N Southdown Dr Hughes Ranch Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Southern Oaks Landing Old Airline Rd 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Southern Trail Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.13 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.13, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk" Ramps Southern Trails Dr Old Airline Rd 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete Southern Trails Dr Old Airline Rd 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Southgate Dr CR 59 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Southgate Dr Trail Trail N N—accessible Southlake Blvd Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Spring Branch Dr Potential Trail6 Springfield Ave Aubrell Rd Neighborhood N N N Springfield Ave McLean Rd 80'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Springfield Ave McLean Rd 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete N—accessible Springfield Ave Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Springfield Ave Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N—accessible Stable Stone Ln Pearland Pkwy • 120'Major Incomplete N Y Stacy Dr Liberty Dr 80'Major Incomplete N Y Stella at SCR Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Stella at SCR Shadow Creek Pkwy 120' Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Stonebridge Dr Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N N Stonepost at SCR MF Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Stonepost at SCR MF Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Stonepost at SCR MF Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N N—accessible Summer Breeze Dr Miller Ranch Rd Neighborhood N N N Summer Breeze Dr Silverlake Pkwy 80'Major Incomplete N Y Summer Ln Veterans Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete N Y Summit Springs Ln Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Sundown Dr Silverlake Pkwy 80' Major Incomplete N Y Sunlake Dr Silverlake Pkwy 80' Major Sidewalks N Y Sunrise Blvd Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Sunrise Meadow Dr Broadway St 120' Major Sidewalks N N Sunset Meadows Dr Broadway St 120' Major N Y N Sycamore Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120' Major Y Incomplete Y Tall Oak Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120' Major Incomplete N Y Terrell Dr Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Texas St W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N Texas St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Texas St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Thalerfield Dr Old Chocolate Bayou Rd 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.14 Table A.14, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk' Ramps The Columns at SCR MF Ttrail to Clear Creek Trail Trail N N The Columns at SCR MF Shadow Creek Pkwy 120' Major Incomplete N N—accessible The Columns at SCR MF Shadow Creek Pkwy 120' Major Sidewalks N N—accessible The Villas at SC Apts Business Center Dr 100'Secondary N N N The Villas at SC Apts Business Center Dr 100'Secondary N N N The Villas at SC Apts Business Center Dr 100'Secondary N N N The Villas at SC Apts Discovery Bay Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N—accessible Towne Lake Dr Oiler Dr 120' Major Incomplete N Y Townhomes at Lake Park Cullen Blvd 120' Major Incomplete N N—accessible Townhomes at Lake Park Potential Trails Trail N N—accessible Townhomes at Lake Park Potential Trail Trail N N—accessible Townhomes at Lake Park Brookside Rd 120'Major N N N Townhomes at Lake Park Brookside Rd 120'Major N N N Tranquility Bay Apt Homes Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N N Tranquility Bay Apt Homes Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N N Tranquility Bay Lakes Blvd Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete N N Travis Lake Ct Potential Trail Trinity Bay Dr Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Y Y Trinity Bay Dr Kingsley Dr 100'Secondary Incomplete Y Y Trinity Bay Drive Shadow Creek Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks Y Y Trinity Country Meadows Oday Rd 100'Secondary N N N Trinity Country Meadows Hartfield Rd 80'Major N N N Trinity Oaks of Pearland Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete N—accessible Tyler St Hatfield Rd 80'Major Incomplete N Y Vail Rd Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Versaille Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Village Creek Dr McLean Rd 80' Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Village Grove Dr Hartfield Rd 80'Major Incomplete N N W Circle Dr Broadway St 120' Major N Incomplete N W Hampton Dr Miller Ranch Rd Neighborhood N N N W Jasmine St Mykawa Rd 100'Secondary Incomplete N N W Mockingbird Ln Manvel Rd 120'Major N N N W Oaks Blvd Fite Rd 80' Major N N N W Oaks Blvd Fite Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y W Oaks Blvd Trail Trail N N—accessible 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.15 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table A.15, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk" Ramp5 W Oaks Cir Trail Trail N N—accessible W Oaks Cir Trail Trail N N—accessible W Oaksl Blvd Broadway St 120' Major N N N W Plum St Potential Trails W Plum St W Orange St 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y W Walnut St Trail Trail N Y Walker Dr Hartfield Rd 80'Major Incomplete N Y Walker Dr Potential Trail Walnut Bend Blvd W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N Walnut Place Ln Old Airline Rd 120'Major Sidewalks N N Wan Bridge Street Fite Rd 60'Minor N N • N Washington St W Walnut St 80'Major Incomplete N N Washington St W Orange St 80'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Washington St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Washington St Broadway St 120'Major N N N Washington-Irving Dr Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Washington-Irving Dr Yost Blvd 100'Secondary Incomplete Incomplete Y Watercrest at SCR Broadway St 100'Secondary Sidewalks N N—accessible Watercrest at SCR Trail Trail Y N—accessible Waterworth Way Trail Trail N N—accessible Watzek Way Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Watzek Way Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Sidewalks N Y Waverly Springs Ln Potential Trail Westchester Circle Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Westchester Circle Manvel Rd 120'Major Incomplete N N Westlake Residential Broadway St 120'Major N N N Westlake Residential Fite Rd 80'Major N N N Westlake Residential Fite Rd 80' Major N N N Westlea Ln Manvel Rd 120'Major N N N Westlea Ln Potential Trail Trail N N Westminister Rd Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Incomplete N Y Westminister Rd Old Alvin Rd 80'Major Incomplete N Y Westminister Rd Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Westminister Rd Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Wheatfield Blvd Pearland Pkwy 120'Major Sidewalks N Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HAAccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-_Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. January 11,2021 A.16 Table A.16, Subdivision Entrance Inventory' Cross Street Access to Pedestrian Subdivision Entry Street (Thoroughfare Name) (Type of Thoroughfare)2: Type of Path3 Crosswalk4 Ramp5 Whispering Winds Dr Potential Trails Whitestone Dr Magnolia Pkwy 100'Secondary Sidewalks Incomplete Y Willits Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Incomplete Y Y Willow Blvd W Orange St 80'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Willow Lake Dr Dixie Farm Rd 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Willow St Harkey Rd 100'Secondary N N N Windfern Dr Broadway St 120'Major Y N Y Winding Rd Broadway St 120'Major N Y N Windsor Dr Old Alvin Rd 80' Major Incomplete N Y Windward Bay Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Windward Bay Dr Broadway St 120' Major Sidewalks N Y Windward Bay Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks Incomplete Y Windward Bay Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Windy Isle Way Discovery Bay Dr 100'Secondary Sidewalks N Y Woodcreek Dr Broadway St 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete N Woods Ct Scarsdale Blvd 120'Major Incomplete Incomplete Y Woodward Springs Dr Charles Ave Neighborhood Incomplete N N Woody Rd Broadway St 120'Major N N N YMCA Dr Broadway St 120'Major Sidewalks N Y Yost Blvd Broadway St 120' Major Incomplete Y Y 1 Data from this table is saved in and can be mapped with"HA_AccessTo_MajorRoads.shp"shapefile. 2 Refer to Thoroughfare Rights-of-Way on page 16 of the Multi-Modal Master Plan. 3 Type of Path:"Sidewalks",there are sidewalks on either side of the subdivision entry point;"Trail",there is direct access to a trail;"Incomplete",there is a sidewalk on once side of the entry and not the other;"N",there are no paths for the subdivision to connect to. 4 Crosswalk:"Y",there are crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"N",there are no crosswalks at the subdivision entry point;"Incomplete",there is a crosswalk but not at all crossings of the intersection,in some cases a crosswalk is not needed at all crossings. 5 Pedestrian Ramp:"Y",there is a pedestrian ramp from sidewalk to cross the street;"N-accessible",there is no ramp but it is still accessible;"N",there is no pedestrian ramp available. 6 Potential Trail:These points have been identified to suggest they will need sidewalks,crosswalks,and/or ramps to access these trails. A.17 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Page left blank intentionally January 11,2021 A.18 • . s• - , S i t14.re al . . A a M u LTI ,...m 0 DAL Asir E , . _ . • Ilk APPENDIX B ,. , -% .. • . , . . _.. . , ... ..., . 44 , .. t,•,,,, . ..,". .41 j .)1: • 4 • ;'" 16,0* b • 4 . vi. I-. i 444 '1'A 341.74 • - '. .... 30'40, •• .„, • , ,.. , . s, . .1; t,. ... .."....N,%$•• t .. -•" ' 41 8 .. ... . " - 'it ..r. ..,„ . •,.• ,„_. 4. - •,,Ipri•' .P.7,,, - •Wpilti • . s , — .. , .„,,, be ' .1/4" L ..4.• -,..-• ... ..0: .s ter i . ..a."A,...., 4., II* •......!ailL„,IA. 1111(II"' „."41tAt.* 441- • )..;e4liT•• ar .1a#' " "alil••ft:-•.1! 4* • PsilitiC." •,' bli .t.'W ••• 11111111/416 . - • •.- ,-..'il • '‘- 't .. - ,. ‘.41", '•-47:c , .., 41.- - . 3. .• ,' 6.1444040„ 1 : , _ - '4 ' • .,--.111r.;; . ..,, . 1 ,1„1-r ag14,4- '• -• ..- • -.. .. .. .. ..,•"' ."--' •''' . 4, • ' •' A-- .0,r . t''•. ., • . •• . .• N ,,t , • " lito• A - - •• ' . r • ...., %#5....„, ..•41%,'• .,• .,: , 0, Tt.-1..- . --•• '.i ..-.1 - ........ - -1. • - - . -• * ._ - . ....• ,.... . . - •% .555/ . . % t ••• . f . . ‘.. ' .Y... ' . ',.`• 5, .• :4' N. 4$ • ." .41•4./.k ‘--- ... ,... .,..t- t••44w r,,,,,., .,_,.. a . - .. ,.4.' • •4 4' (-. 4.1. . • It,'_l..,.kg..•.:'1i'.11 k,'•,0.N',.,-...,."„14••,'.s l-•%i..,'l'„..-':-.-.'-•,.''..."_-,,,4..,."*;401_6 1'014 kW0,a1..4-/•.L.--0...1'.-..''.1.1"0,.4.,.„'1'.'."4a,.,1-.'.. -'1 h.••l-.e‘'• 't. -'ii.. ' '1.' '!•. ''...'I i.'.•t,• ..'.4'.;6 10,1.10 0. .. .1•i'4'M.i•'l.l-.A.1.' . , . .- • • I-'''i. ' `"Ig-.,4-,'-4.11.,-•V:*I •..0.1,..••, .. . .. .....' A1 . • 1., ..:,-1-,.'D•l•,i•-•::.;. •a,i7 . . ' 4),• 4 ... I • g 1 S .., . -'• : . - . • 1 • . -N I •I,. • •-4.•1 l, . ••• * I ' I Ar-;, • r•• 1 I 1 041 tr. • / .... •'"1,_. ' • • -.11/10. 011411114' . III =-• ••• ••• .4.6.„..0..•• .. . ' 1 ' a 1 . 440, iii 1 1 , , .. „, -, - • ! .7 , . , .,. ;•. • . , . '..- -4 , , -., , 4 I! •1 . - . I ' 1 ••,',, .•'. I'' IP• , s• 1, . .ji -, s.... , ,. • i ' Vs.‘S 11. II.• ^* ;.-... t . .z. _ - -4: ...\ '• • k•,4;..„.,_. .. - .•-• ..-fa, 11". --- • • .. . •,- . . . --- * ' . . . • - . . .. - • .- - ' -: - . • - B.1 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN ` - .. . - . -- - APPENDIX B Pedestrian Level of Service Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS) is divided into four main categories: Comfort, Safety, Ease of Mobility and Convenience. Each category plays an integral role in the overall use-ability of a trail system. Pedes- trians may initially overlook one or more categories while using a trail, but the overall effectiveness will likely not be achieved. In time,the trail may not live up to its full potential as pedestrians look for alternative means by which to get from Point A to Point B, while the trails do not get used. Comfort is another sign that the user's comfort is being ad- A trail's comfort level can be described as its abil- dressed. ity to attract users by offering them amenities that maintain the user's comfort level while using the Shade in the form of naturally growing trees or over- trail. The trail's surface material is an important head pavilions provides relief from solar exposure item as it is the element that is used the most. A and sweltering heat. Temporary relief from the sun concrete trail offers a flat and smooth walking or can give the user time to recuperate and continue running surface that is easy to maintain, ensures a along the trail. long lifespan, yet is hard on the human body when Full rest stations and trailheads with associated frequently used for running. Mothers pushing stroll- amenities can provide longer stopping points than ers find concrete trails to be easier to use, but jog- the short relief given by trees and pavilions. Rest gers typically do not, as running on a concrete trail stations with seating, drinking fountains, restrooms is conducive to shin splints. A decomposed granite and bicycle racks will encourage the trail user to trail on the other hand, offers a smoother running stop and rest before continuing. Trailheads are an and bicycling surface yet is difficult to use when indicator of a trail's point of origin. pushing a stroller. Maintenance is also a challenge as loose decomposed granite migrates about af- Safety ter continuous use or by heavy gusts of wind, or rain storm. Over time, routine replacement of the The second major category used for evaluating pe- decomposed granite may become cost prohibitive. destrian level of service is safety.As use of the trail The most effective trail system minimizes all short- system is an outdoor activity, many precautions are comings by balancing their uses or having a combi- taken to ensure the user's personal safety is not nation of surfaces. threatened.Since usage of the trails is not limited to the daytime only, proper lighting should be provided The trail's slope gradient is an important factor for the safety of users during evening hours. Light- when considering inclusivity and use for all age ing also serves as a wayfinding device as its place- groups, including those with disabilities. Physically ment can provide visual cues for users regarding and visually impaired users may find a trail difficult the path to be taken. to use if there are sharp grade changes. On the other hand, the slope cannot be totally flat as the A trail system may not always relegated to more trail may tend to collect water during a storm event. remote areas and separated from vehicular traffic. Trails are oftentimes combined with sidewalks and Maintenance of a trail system is important as it im- are located adjacent to the edge of a thoroughfare. pacts use and trail longevity. A clean surface free If possible, pedestrians and bicyclists should not of overgrown grass and noxious weeds will attract share the same travel lane with vehicles. Physical users. Overhanging tree limbs that are pruned back barriers can be placed between pedestrian ways away from bicyclists should also be a routine main- and vehicle lanes to increase safety.Trees, bollards tenance consideration. Repairs to cracked con- and space enhancers such as grass strips are ex- crete and replacement of lost decomposed granite amples of safety barriers. January 11,2021 B.2 Pedestrians will inevitably cross street intersections destinations. Thematic wayfinding signs typically and in doing so, their safety can be compromised. found along trails and within parks include iden- Physical precautions that can be taken to minimize tification, informational (interpretive), regulatory, this risk include crosswalk markings, curb cuts, and directional signage. Identification signs are refuge islands and wide sight distances. Whether typically located at the park entrance and clearly the street intersection is signalized or not, cross- identifies the park or trail's name and is oftentimes walk markings inform the driver that the area has accompanied by a dedication plaque. Informational the high likelihood of pedestrian activity. For hand- or interpretive signs can be found within the trail icapped pedestrians, curb cuts and ramps should system and may contain information describing the be provided at intersections to allow wheelchair local flora and fauna, the local ecology or reference access across curbed streets. For street crossings to something of historical or cultural significance. with a median, refuge islands give the pedestrian a Regulatory signs can dictate what kind of vehicles safe location to wait for an approaching vehicle to may use the trail, as well as what kind of behavior pass. The pedestrian may safely cross the street is allowed versus prohibited when using the trail. once the vehicle leaves. Additionally, the safety of Directional signs are designed to help prevent the pedestrians can be further compromised if the driv- user from getting lost. Directional signs are located er is not given enough distance and time to react at junction points or on the path where a trail user to their presence. The site distance should be wide may look for instructions on how to reach a destina- and deep so the driver can either slow their vehicle tion point. These signs may contain a mile marker or wait for the pedestrian to move out of vehicular or indicate the distance to destination points. The range to safer areas. use of signage also offers the trail user a temporary respite or pause while traversing a long trail. Ease of Mobility For the trail user, whether walking or running, any The third category for evaluating pedestrian level of break in stride can cause the user to lose focus. service is the ease of mobility. Ease of mobility can This is especially true if the trail or sidewalk meets be described as the level of difficulty a pedestrian a street intersection. Any crossing delays greater incurs in traversing a trail system. For instance,the than 60 seconds may cause an impatient user to trail should be wide enough that it can be shared forgo waiting at a street intersection and proceed to with other pedestrians and/or bicyclists traveling in cross without proper safe notification. The conse- both directions. Enough room should be provided quences may be disastrous. Proper signal phasing that the user can move along a desired path with- should remain within the 60 second range. out radically altering their forward movements in order to avoid other pedestrians and bicyclists.The Convenience American Association of State Highway Transpor- tation Officials (AASHTO) recommends a minimum The final category for pedestrian level of service is width of eight feet, while the Texas Department of convenience. The two main categories used to de- Transportation (TxDOT) requires a minimum width fine trail users include the casual walker and the of ten feet and a maximum slope of five percent. hard runner. The runner typically uses a trail for The average speed maintained by a trail user exercise and will often return to the point of origin should dictate the width of the multi-use trail so the upon completion of use. Convenience plays a piv- user can safely bypass slower pedestrians while otal role for the casual walker as the destination minimizing conflicts. is often the main purpose for using the trail. The ease of connectivity and distance to destinations Wayfinding signage can play a key role in the ease including parks, transit stations, commercial/retail of mobility as it is a tool that indicates where the centers, and community gathering spaces are rea- user is located as well as the location of intended sons why the casual walker may forgo the use of automobiles. B.3 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B 2015 Parks Master Plan: Walkable Level of Service The walkable level of service was summarized in the 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the following observations were made: 1. "Neighborhood Parks" don't often score high enough to meet the [GRASP] threshold [of 67.2] or may lack trail access, often needed for a park to reach the threshold point. 2. Several of Pearland's neighborhood parks do not offer enough quality facilities or amenities. 3. Alternative providers (i.e., homeowners asso- N ciations, municipal utility districts) supplement Pearland's neighborhood park level of service. Q `. 4. There is heavy reliance on alternative providers Ce at a walkable neighborhood level of service in many areas. X. 5. The quality of parks provided by alternative providers varies greatly across the system. LL.iCt ' 6. Analysis of the location of Pearland's residen- tial areas indicates an even distribution of parks where people live, with over 75 percent of the (J') 0-19 age group having walkable access to `. �' �some recreation facility or amenity. 7. There is a need to identify and collect inventory Q : data on the remaining alternative providers of parks/facilities. ( '. 7/ When it comes to trails and trail access: % 4 1. A variety of trails are available across the city, but they are not necessarily meeting the needs and demands of the community. 2. A significant portion of these trails may have limited, or restricted access based on locations within subdivisions. N a a a,0 s s cJ i 3. Trail access is notably absent from many of Pearland's residential neighborhoods. 4. As described within Chapter 3 of Pearland's Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan, based on Pearland's projected population growth over the next five to seven years, additional park land and facilities will likely need to be required for the system to maintain an acceptable level of service (e.g., per NRPA facility standards). Image Source:Halff Associates January 11,2021 B.4 Overview of Level of Service Findings Although the City of Pearland contains several eral, the trail system is in very good condition and miles of trails and sidewalks,that are maintained by received an overall score of 1.5. MUDs and hom,eowners associations, the follow- ing is an overview of the trails that are maintained Table B.1,Assessment Categories by the City of Pearland.As a part of the Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS), a conditions assessment Sidewalks and Surface condition, pathway/trail widths, was performed on Pearland's trail system. The ac- Trails vertical and horizontal clearance, tual Trail Conditions Assessment sheets for each of crossing points, and ADA accessibility. Pearland's trails are included within Appendix A of Considers variations in pathway/trail this document. The averaged scores are displayed type depending on the type of fitness, recreational, or transportation activities in Table 8.2, Trail Conditions Assessment on the trail is designed to support. page B.7. The respective scoring categories are as follows and described in Table B.1, Assessment Plantings and Health, maintained conditions, and Categories: Trees coverage of trees and other landscaping including overgrowth, strategic place- 1. Sidewalks and Trails 6. Buildings, Shelters, ment of vegetation to define park spaces 2. Plantings Trees and Pavilions and provide shade. 3. Parking 7. Signage 4. Trail Accessibility 8. Lighting Parking Off-street parking areas and proximate 5. Trail Amenities on-street parking areas. Condition Scale Trail Bicycle, pedestrian and ADA access to, Accessibility from, and within, the park space. The scores for each facility or improvement follow National recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) Trail Amenities Accessory amenities serving to enhance conventions and range from zero (0) to four (4), comfort including waste receptacles, with zero representing the improvements that are pet waste stations, drinking fountains, in the best condition. A ranking of four is for those benches, grills, sheltered/unsheltered trails that are in very poor condition and therefore, picnic tables, etc. either warrant replacement, rehabilitation,or recon- struction. Buildings, General recreational and accessory Shelters, and structures (enclosed and open air) in- 0 1 2 3 4 Pavilions eluding pavilions, restrooms, concession I I I I I stands, and special use facilities support very good good fair poor very poor miscellaneous activities.Areas defined for public gathering including seating and shade structures. As depicted in Table B.2, Trail Conditions As- sessment, for each trail there was a tabulation of Signage Identification, information, directional, the scores, divided by the total number scored.The and wayfinding signage. composite score indicates the overall condition of the trail, and in turn, provides a means to compare Lighting Lighting standards, fixture, and coverage the condition of each trail relative to others. In gen- area. B.5 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Order of Magnitude Costs for Trails In order to develop an improvement program for The trail conditions assessment findings are sum- Pearland's park and trail system and increase the marized on the following pages. Each trail assess- level of service, development costs for remedial ment includes a brief description, a rating and recommendations were compiled. Construction analysis of its existing conditions and remedial rec- and material costs for current(2020)projects within ommendations related to PLOS findings are provid- Pearland and the Houston metropolitan area were ed. Figure B.1, Pedestrian Refuge, exemplifies a used to determine order of magnitude (planning recommendation to improve the PLOS for various level) construction costs for the City's network of trails. Some trails listed are located within an asso- parks and trails. ciated park where both share amenities. The following estimates use current 2020-dollar values and include a 10 percent contingency for inflation and other unknown variables such as the construction of shorter trail segments that may incur higher unit costs.An additional 15 percent fee was also added to account for professional services(soft costs) such as surveying, design and construction administration associated with landscape sirework Figure B.1, Pedestrian Refuge improvements. The costs for the demolition of any By grouping the bench and lighted bollard with a concrete or decomposed trails to be replaced has cluster of three trees spaced in a triangular pattern been accounted for in the aggregate price. and spanning the trail, a pedestrian refuge is cre- ated. Bench Unit and aggregate construction costs for a new concrete sidewalk were provided by the City of Pearland Engineering and Capital Projects Depart- ment,and include a 3,000 psi, six(6)inch thick con- 416 crete slab with a medium broom finish, #4 steel re- inforcement bars @ 12 inches on center each way on stabilized subgrade with control joints every five • (5) feet on center, an expansion joint at every 30 Trail feet on center and a maximum cross slope of one T.* percent. Lightedw Construction costs for a decomposed granite trail Bollard Shade , include all labor and materials for a four (4) inch deep layer and a six(6)inch wide concrete contain- Trees ment curb along each side of the trail. The costs do not account for mobilization costs as that is de- termined by how much work will be performed at a given time by the contractor. January 11,2021 B.6 Table B.2, Trail Conditions Assessment Refer to Map B.1, Existing Trails on facing page for the location of trails. C -0 U) C i C F. U) E o: Q c O) U E ,o0�0 C) o • N a) -L -co c - d. 22 ; C L E v rn a U) H a I— I— c0 ca U) co i 0 1 Centennial Park Trail 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 1.0 2 Clear Creek Trail - East(Green Tee Terrace) 0 3 1 1 0 4 0 4 1.6 3 Clear Creek Trail -West' N/A ! N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A' 4 Corrigan-Woody Park Trail 2 1 0 4 4 4 4 ' 4 2.9 5 Cypress Village Park Trail 3 2 3 4 4 0 4 4 3.0 6 Edible Fruit Trail 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 4 1.6 7 Independence Park Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.5 8 Mary's Creek Trail (Central) 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 4 2.5 9 Mary's Creek Trail (East) 3 1 0 1 0 0 4 4 1.6 10 Mary's Creek Trail (West) 0 2 4 4 4 0 0 2 2.0 11 Pine Hollow Park Trail 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 1.0 12 Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trail 2 2 0 4 1 0 0 4 1.6 13 Southdown Park Trail 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.6 14 South Gate Park Trail 0 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 2.1 15 The Sports Complex at SCR Trail 0 2 0 4 4 0 1 1 1.5 16 Town Ditch Trail 0 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3.4 17 Trails at JHEC 2 3 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.6 18 Woodcreek Park Trail 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 4 1.5 19 Zychlinski Park Trail 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.6 Composite Score 0.9 2.0 2.3 1.7 0.9 1.4 3.2 ■ 1 Clear Creek Trail-West was not assessed and rated because it is currently under construction. B.7 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN .,. MAP B.1 7 EXISTING TRAILS El ,, ., _-------, 0 January 11.2021 / fnen" Lii nese.. ;, v. Hike arid...•NI ;cernAlAgne?'"'" , Trail Shack.Creel, 95m. 11solees• Ike.*Pe \ tr,pLI ::-,*.:' /41,...VAII. 15 R.n.1....Tr"Cie*Creek . . ""--7f 747-7— \ Mitetddlerrell i * w• dortIvitriv ''''-, 41 WM' / ''' \ ivivivvv.Rvo_ no me 131Ia irsil tee / : hi= l'' ...er A •. tirkg' ,..*.404.1.'' /.4, .. ....w. , ,—, ,,A =td4. :',. "P• 0 r .,. rV'Ll v=iit\ 'rt-,- -I - '- ,i [ . '.\,•_-1.-,'1 /, wer ;, I _-4-.- cS- IP t.0 ifeit, • El Wood<reek Part',ad' ‘-' . Ittai m_1_, ...1V.entrall i,,....,.. i (.... 'ti V f .4.IZE :,::: " s',., 1.1?,71 . .. /Eirgfr it :RI diri.4:421.1 \ t ?Z. - g„„pizi ,,,,,,,ci.L.:, ",,-,..... ,.ii.iti.t \ .„.. :-/: 'i. .er.,CA101, soArete•-• a...... 0 ,. .....= ,' Li ..MM.,,-42=c,.« ; 0,,,„, , \ , / Tn. ,,, ,,..,5'I LL ,..s• , l ...„, i 0 LEGEND Existing Sidewalks —Existing City Trails (311 —Existing Subdivision Trails 0 2,500 5 000 feet —Existing County Trails City Data http//gis pearlandtx gun/web!.Additional Data.TxDOT.FEMA,Brazorta County.and H-GAC:and Aenal imagery www nearmap corn 0 Existing Trailheads 0 Existing Bridges 0 Centennial Park Trail Centennial Park Key Map rating: 1.0 Location.A 1.6-mile-long trail located within Cen- tennial Park at the intersection of Fite Road and McLean Road. Access and Convenience. Off-street parking is provided by Centennial Park's parking lot. Comfort. The trail is in good condition although there is grass growing over the edges in several ar- eas.Amenities such as restrooms,off-street park- ing and benches are shared by both the park and ' trail users.Minimal shade is given to the benches . • as most of the trees are young and short. Safety.Although security lighting is provided for the `,. =. parking lot and sports lighting is provided for the I play fields,there is no trail lighting. Ease of Mobility.The trail system consists of an tl eight-foot-wide concrete perimeter trail which con- nects the park's elements.Park signs are located "° mtr.,rA- at the entrances of the park with pedestrian access being provided by curb ramps at the street corners AillOMINEME ---_ along the northern edge of the park and a walking bridge across Mary's Creek to the south. Remedial Recommendations.Add benches with trees and pedestrian lighting along the trail for eve- Image soO C Assocee ning use and trail security.By grouping the bench and lighted bollard with a cluster of three trees d-4• ,^. spaced in a triangular pattern and spanning the trail,a pedestrian refuge node is created(refer to Figure B.1,on page B.6)for a graphic example of this node).Add four nodes every 1,000 linear feet along the trail.Add a cluster of three trees and one lighted bollard to each of the two existing benches at the easternmost ball fields.Add two trees each to the benches at the playground.Add three trees and a lighted bollard at the bench north of the fourplex ball fields.On the facing page,Table B.3,Centen- nial Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs sum- marizes likely costs; and Figure B.2, Centennial Park Trail,Opportunities for Improvement,illus- Image Source:Haiti Assoclsles trates recommended improvements. B.9 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.3, Centennial Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Benches 4 ea. $1,750.00 $7,000.00 (Victor Stanley, 6' long, steel construction) Lighted bollards 7 ea. $625.00 $4,375.00 Trees(45 gal.) 25_ ea. $450.00 $11,250.00 Grand Total $22,625.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1. Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin "Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.2, Centennial Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Centennial Park. 1. t 1 srffi � �' .4. -i1f !!� • _w f#. ' k ( t 4114 i 1 . .. - # Ili . ' **. 1„ +r �":' Centennial Pa ., " �' .�t ry a' . Ar _ - `, ` • -�•. 'ter / -- ' !' ..A , -•.- - , :, , 'sni . . , .... . , it �F r a� / ti i at • iiiihr* , , , 1 ft I a. :. ° _ _, .� .- - A- ' 4 i 1 1 1. O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap • Existing Trailhead/Marker o Bench Lighted Bollards Tree January 11,2021 B.10 40,1•C "' UClear Creek Trail - East Clear Creek Trail-East Key Map rating: 2.0 Location. Clear Creek Trail (East) is a 2.3-mile- long trail located adjacent to The Preserve at High- l4 E land Glen and The Enclave at Highland Glen on the eastern side of the City. This is the eastern most section of Clear Creek Trail with the western portion beginning in proximity to the Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trail. Plans are underway to connect the two trails. Access and Convenience. Access to the trail is provided by an off-street parking lot along Pearland Parkway. The parking lot also includes a land- scaped shade structure and a wayfinding sign. Comfort. Although the trail surface is smooth to walk, run and bike on, the lack of trees around the trail, picnic table and benches does not offer pro- tection against the sun. Safety.There are no lights along the trail for pedes- trian safety Ease of Mobility. Additional wayfinding signs with • shade structures are provided at trail nodes. The • trail is composed of a 10-foot wide concrete walk and is in good condition with gentle slopes for the physically handicapped and those pushing a stroll- Image Source:HalffAssociates er. Remedial Recommendations. Add trees along the trail for increased pedestrian comfort. For shade and security, provide a bench with a lighted bollard and a cluster of three trees (refer to Figure B.1, on t — - page B.6)every 1,000 linear feet for a total of eight benches, eight lighted bollards and 24 trees. The two benches and single picnic table would benefit jj from a cluster of trees per element for a total of nine r • trees. On the facing page, Table B.4, Clear Creek Trail- East, Order of Magnitude Costs, summa- rizes likely costs; and Figure B.3, Clear Creek Trail - East, Opportunities for Improvement, il- lustrates recommended improvements. Image Source:Halff Associate- B.11 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.4, Clear Creek Trail- East, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Benches (Victor Stanley, 6' long, steel construction) 8 ea. $1,750.00 $14,000.00 Lighted bollards 8 ea. $625.00 $5,000.00 Trees (45 gal.) 33 ea. $450.00 $14,850.00 Grand Total $33,850.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.3, Clear Creek Trail-East, Opportunities for Improvement Jo/ 'NV s „••, , - - , =,. .• A Srt", .._.a",, �ir r '.t a"(�e;_4* ®gyp s ` . . { . . ,- f 4�t� r ", ft Existing h rS r es. �s� f Bridge ,,,,,• , ': al ,;. ', Picnic Tables ' \\ f�. o" a°,ivo .f- ; \lap At - .3' --:.-2., .;%.:\., 1•, i N\ (''' Proposed bridge over . r� `\t ,�y�' ,r'r.: • _ ' a t'` �., ' . �� . Clear Creek to connect to Town Ditch Trail „ w ° ;ri �'y >� f ✓' `tr (see pa B,39 • . • . - iiii ;Ilk , .d Town Ditch Trail ,'1":y ►*, ,� "` ! et q" } +t { yr, . ,. l' } O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap 0 Bench Trail Addition Lighted Bollards Elm Connecting/Nearby •Tree Existing Trail January 11,2021 B.12 Clear Creek Trail - West Clear Creek Trail- West Alignment, Key Map rating: N/A At the time of this report, the western portion of 1 Clear Creek Trail is under construction, thus a trail \ ' analysis cannot be conducted. Figure B.4, Clear Creek Trail - West Alignment, produced by the 035 City of Pearland illustrates the trail's proposed alignment. Based on findings from the existing trails, major deficiencies on the pedestrian level of service include a lack of trees to provide shade,trail accessibility, and lighting for safety. Measures need to be taken to ensure these elements are not over- looked in final trail implementation. B.13 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Figure B.4, Clear Creek Trail- West Alignment Existing Tr,a, fe • 11111111.11 ' . —- «-e".• „„.. AIM& • .... . t#• .4 I Allk • 1.1k 1 w l . te ' ... -......../a• — .... t• ,.,• • r . _ _ __ ......... - 0- ___ 1 _ , 110 ,,t• Is _ - 1 0,7 t-- - • ' .. ' /•- - _-, ..... • " , •.' • Ne'• 1:141 . ,V,',''..-e• • ' ' •-1.;'''A'''l 41101/11.* ,.,_ 1'7' • ...- ' '' '.s tfr.:t. ' .• "4 #Vt •• ../ '• '. 0 V - • . 1 4 ••• • • ' • ' ' • • I • 4 ____-----.46---111111---41.0p11 . .... r . ..,. .., „ . ,..IF•• 4 , "- •., . • '''' P:'0 . •-•'--- '.0. 1 • - 0 el 1 '.. ... 0 e " • i •'''' ,.•• 4 VC. 6 ,, ..te l „I't 4 . ' -- Om - . ':. T•77-114 '' MOW I i r.'..4t 'If' -1 tr ..4 '* i .. 's • 1 4114 %le* 104;000........."" . ,.. "Mi• ''' li * *?*(• ' j • .. VI, 4 l ' *il :` C.9.'1` . . -• '" ''' C) lhor'.4`1" ' Ot4 /PI f g ...... , ,............- ok p.:0 .11 IA. • ' . . .Z .., 11, 7 ... ....1,, z IttOeto' : •3 % ,-P•or • --...-. Oftle t ....Iv till'7 4,1 C 4 in- OF i3EARLAND I 111111h:.. e 1 rol-4=reet ra.painat ea las welesmowaa:/wpm. awl WII,UN law Ilona pap=melba w bee ,= 4•83 kie was1/4 it leewaL wwwwalaw at wwwwwe 1 ailiflagg lama p.speom•Its 4•••am wwwawat ra awed/. Oral avower awl wwwwww.at,Cm awwwwwala warms Lawman al"roam • , • SLAP PIMPARED Arc:015 bahagamma GIS DTPARTIFTV7 Image Source City of Pearland January 11,2021 B.14 V. Aft.. tjo —_ 4 Corrigan-Woody Park Trail Corrigan-Woody Park Trail Key Map rating: 2.9 Location. A 0.4-mile-long trail located adjacent to �^ the Corrigan North, Malone and Walker Estates subdivisions. Access and Convenience. Off-street parking . and access is provided by a decomposed granite parking lot on Woody Road. Pedestrian access is through the adjacent residential subdivisions. Comfort.Amenities include a play structure which are shared by park and trail users. The trail is in -r , moderate condition though there are areas of �;y.'`� ponding water. Tall trees flank the trail and provide • shade for trail users, but there are few seating ar- i eas. - Safety. No lighting exists at the parking lot or the �— trail creating a potential safety hazard during eve- ning use. ab) Ease of Mobility. Corrigan-Woody Trail is corn- prised of an eight-foot-wide decomposed granite trail that is handicapped accessible; though mobili- ._. -- ty is compromised as the decomposed granite is in poor condition.There are identification/wayfinding signs present. Portion of trail within Woody Street Park.Image Source:Halff Associates Remedial Recommendations. Replenish the de- composed granite and regrade the trail. Add con- crete curbs at the trail edges to contain the decom- posed granite. Add a trail sign for user reference and add trail connections to W. Orange Street for pedestrian access to the park and trail.Add four tall security lights at the parking lot and trail as there • are no streetlights along the west side of Woody - Road. Extend the trail so that Corrigan-Woody Trail .. can become a part of the overall City of Pearland trail system.Add four benches and four lighted bol- '- lards underneath the large trees along the trail at a rate of one each per 500 linear feet. Add cross- walks • and curb cuts across Woody Road and Cun- ningham Drive in order to safely access the parks. On the facing page, Table B.5, Corrigan-Woody Portion of trail within Corrigan Park.Image Source:Halff Associates Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs,summariz- es likely costs; and Figure B.5, Corrigan-Woody Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illus- trates recommended improvements. B.15 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table B.5, Corrigan-Woody Parks Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Curb ramp i 5 ea. $1,500.00 $7,500.00 Crosswalk and Stop Bar Striping 5 ea. $3,125.00 $15,625.00 Construct decomposed granite trail 267 s.y. $75.00 $20,025.00 Decomposed granite trail replacement 1,635 s.y. $75.00 $122,625.00 Trailhead/Marker 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Benches (Victor Stanley, 8'long) 4 ea. $1,750.00 $7,000.00 Lighted Bollards 4 ea. $625.00 $2,500.00 Light Poles(35'tall with anchor bolts) 4 ea. $3,750.00 $15,000.00 Trees (45 gal.) 5 ea. $450.00 . $2,250.00 Grand Total i $197,725.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.5, Corrigan-Woody Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Corrigan and Woody Parks. ti ' � ! ' .. > �,flyt$'1 eye,i ' ♦ .. f ( 7. 7 ■ ,.. � , ! �ifS t )Y1 r , v rTk tf. _ i - -. fi' e1,4 j rM,f '� +` rot ' re' tr ♦ u Iw'°' i 4 ., 44t, ; r. , li` ii,v14 e..„,' -1'4;4' :Tic ' .11 . . , , . , ::, ...,,,I,.., ,.... „ y '-...,-.4ii. iti A ;,,T. .t-41ipt,-v. .‘ 17—4./.. *41F-4.i. -. ill . .,., i.:.;..,' . ir ih... 4. g , .„ .-.1y..\ , ,... ,4-i... tv,,....11. i . .1ii% : : ''. , ::,it,'''ri':. " ..4.Li,..-'V..:tIrt,_ t Irv' it SQj�?` tY t ' sYk ❑ O �1 � ` ® ` 1 r . „ ' +�l '! �tif. `� M # 4 sty !_•. y t. yl bj lry;.. •\'1+f�` a•1t .}•` i +'�'�� 1��/I•.•`A. a. `�4 •• t {,,. * `�* ( •t '" 1,• � .I .""SSleYr7t + .,"41; S . Corrigan 0/ ii) 4..1 -......ak , I - . IN, - _ . Park _ unnin! a iv= r f� ;�� ,, i i . � 4 }per,. �';. I ,. O0 il.' . ;—elv„„, f .46 Trail Addition Lighted Bollards 111111 Crosswalk Trailhead/Marker Light Poles Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Shade Structure January 11, 2021 B.16 0 Bench Tree 0 Relocated Basketball Court © Cypress Village Park Trail Cypress Village Park Trail Key Map rating: 3.0 Location. Cypress Village Park Trail is a 0.4-mile- I �^ long trail which connects Cypress Village subdivi- l A Sion to Mary's Creek. Access and Convenience. On-street parking is • provided with curb ramps along Summit Drive. Pe- destrian access is through the residential neighbor- hood. Comfort.The concrete trail near the park is in good shape, but the concrete portions within the de- Is . composed granite sections have overgrown grass along the sides and within the construction joints. x'yN >r ?" Medium-sized trees line the trail at the playground, ' but none exist along the decomposed granite por- tion at the rear of the park. The decomposed gran- ite trail needs repair as some areas are difficult to maneuver due to lack of decomposed granite cover and heavy weed growth.A pavilion is located within - the park and is accessible to trail users and park patrons.There are no trail amenities provided other than the trash receptacles at the pavilion. Safety. There are two streetlights at both ends of the park frontage, though no lighting exists within the park itself.There are open views of the trail sys- Image Source Halff Associates tern from the residential neighborhood. Ease of Mobility. The looping trail is a major component of the park. the trail is comprised of a trail, a pedestrian refuge is created.Add four nodes six-foot-wide concrete and decomposed granite spaced at 300 linear foot intervals along the trail. walking surface. The concrete portion of the trail Eradicate the weeds and replenish the decom- is comfortable to walk/run on, but the decomposed posed granite trail, then add concrete curbs along granite portion of the trail has lost its integrity as its perimeter to contain the granite aggregate. Add the granite aggregate has migrated away from the a connection to the sidewalk along Magnolia Park- main trail section. No wayfinding signs are present way that connects to the trail system within the throughout the trail or park. John Hargrove Environmental Complex (Trails at Remedial Recommendations. Add benches with JHEC, refer to pages B.41-42). On the facing page, trees and pedestrian lighting along the trail for eve- Table B.6, Cypress Village Park Trail, Order of ning use and trail security. By grouping the bench Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and and lighted bollard with a cluster of three trees Figure B.6, Cypress Village Park Trail, Opportu- spaced in a triangular pattern and spanning the nities for Improvement, illustrates recommended improvements. B.17 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.6, Cypress Village Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Replenish decomposed granite trail 750 s.y. $75.00 $56,250.00 Trailhead / Marker 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Benches 4 ea. $1,750.00 $7,000.00 (Victor Stanley, 6' long, steel construction) Lighted Bollards 4 ea. $625.00 $2,500.00 Trees (45 gal.) 12 ea. $450.00 $5,400.00 Grand Total $76,350.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1. Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure 8.6, Cypress Village Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks.Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Cypress Village Park. ,.,...,.._- .- 1,r.._ - - !r"- ..;a. 0, Magnolia Parkway — f✓ t fr. ,., fie.,► » o • 4. t \ Mary's Creek r J , ,,' tikaa' Trail-West ' IPIAS' 6' a' r =AO' - °11) ' iliti.0164":'..,/ N. .' 0 i ' - .- I . - . '- yp ess r age !, ., Park - -t-1 ram'.. O m r rn r 1 T r prr 1 lD f 441" 4;4#1.frillltri CD Sr r ; ,,, 4a: 4- t - ris ' 1 ' As r O • Park Sign • Tree Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap o Bench IllIII Crosswalk Lighted Bollards Recommended trail connections to existing Trails January 11,2021 B.18 at JHEC(refer to pages B.41-42) 6 Edible Fruit Trail Edible Fruit Trail Key Map rating: 1 .6 Location. The trail is located on the north side of Magnolia Parkway, across from the Delores Fen- l wick Nature Center and the Stella Roberts Recy- cling Center. Access and Convenience.The Edible Fruit Trail is a segment of Mary's Creek Trail which runs along Mary's Creek in a west to east direction. Comfort. The 0.4-mile trail is composed of a 10- foot-wide concrete trail with a smooth surface and a gentle cross slope. There are few trees along the • trail to provide shade to the trail users. Other than the fruit trees, the existing shade trees are locat- _ ed away from the picnic tables and do not provide _ , �� shade. The single trailhead along Magnolia Park- ; way has a pair of benches with an overhead shade structure. Other amenities include a dual-use drink- r r roking fountain and two waste/recycling receptacles. Safety. Although the trail is located adjacent to a **. roadway, trail lighting is needed as the trail is well over 80 feet away from the streetlights. There is no off-street parking at this park, but trail users can park in the lot at the Delores Fenwick Nature Cen- ter and the Stella Roberts Recycling Center. The Image Source:Half Associates difficulty is crossing Magnolia Parkway where the addition of a crosswalk and curb ramp is warranted. Ease of Mobility.There is a park identification sign walk and stop bar striping for pedestrian crossing at and three wayfinding signs along the trail. The trail parking lot. Resurfacing of the Fite Bridge Bar Colo- is interactive and educational as there are interpre- ny sign is needed as weathering from the elements tive signs which direct users to consume the fruits is shown. On the facing page, Table B.7, Edible from the planted trees. Fruit Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summariz- Remedial Recommendations. Provide shade es likely costs; and Figure B.7, Edible Fruit Trail, trees along the trail at a rate of one tree per 300 Opportunities for Improvement, illustrates rec- linear feet for a total of seven trees. Provide seven ommended improvements. bollard lights at 300 linear feet on center for safety. Provide a curb ramp at the trail head with cross- B.19 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.7, Edible Fruit Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Curb ramp ' 1 ea. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 Crosswalk and Stop Bar Striping 2 ea. $3,125.00 $6,250.00 Signalized Pedestrian Crossing 1 ea. $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Sign Refurbishment 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Lighted Bollards 7 ea. $625.00 $4,375.00 Trees(45 gal.) 7 ea. $450.00 $3,150.00 Grand Total j $45,475.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. "Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin ** Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.7, Edible Fruit Trail, Opportunities for Improvement r r!!t- i✓ i -j - }mow♦� �� p+.sr++'�'�R.,i f.'F''� 1 t 1. ;, .,o . r 'H .� '".... - 1'. ''s Magnolia Parkway _ �!� r I - ,e, \ .r--. • I `•�W,^. Delores Fenwick + . Hill ature Center !, r ^ m r 1 1. —ilA': • f ., i ` a ar '. 1 - .... Trails MA Hargrove g Environmental Complex 1 Fil 'it! ' :-- it Mink Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap 0 O Curb ramp 4 Lighted Bollards 111111 Crosswalk Tree © Refurbished min Connecting/Nearby January 11,2021 B.20 Trailhead/Marker Existing Trail att r ) UIndependence Park Trail Independence Park Trail Key Map rating: 0.5 Location. Independence Park Trail is located in the northern section of Independence Park. Access and Convenience. Vehicular access is 13 provided by the parking lot within the park. Pe- destrian access is provided by a connection with Mary's Creek Trail-East. Comfort. Although this trail is adjacent to Mary's Creek Trail-East, its condition is much better as there is sufficient aggregate composing the surface material. Large trees exist along the trail to provide •', _ shade. Trail amenities are provided at Indepen- "0 ,111,Wi:• dence Park such as bathroom facilities, drinking • ram. r fountains and waste receptacles. i�— Safety. Lighting for evening use is provided along - " ' - the trail. Lights are located in proximity to seating areas with benches.The trail itself has ample sepa- ... �.�_�;;•:. ration from John Lizer Road which decreases con- _ _ ,;; s*- cerns about personal safety in proximity to moving - �f vehicles. Ease of Mobility. The 0.4-mile-long decomposed granite trail is easy to maneuver as the loops are wide enough for ease of turning while on a bicycle. Image Source:Halff Associates Remedial Recommendations.Add a node sign at entrance for trail identification. On the facing page, ti Table B.8, Independence Park Trail, Order of -`,* `lot. Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and gi -s , ,; " ;,$ Figure B.8 Independence Park Trail, Opportu- 7y*. • , nities for Improvement, illustrates recommended ti. ' _ - = "i "' - •ir, r• improvements. 4- .f ; t � �• 1 . R. • i. I rit " I ail Image Source:Halff Associates B.21 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.8, Independence Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Trailhead / Marker 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Grand Total $5,200.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin ** Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.8, Independence Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks.Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Independence Park. John Lizer Road + �N `ram✓ _ ``j.. t • 4 ° Independence Park .0e� " Y �u ' )it , . ' - , .'sit*. . „ Niyi, . .,44146i.ss,4sNs:„.... . . , . , , , , sisiNoli , ;. " °Trail-Cast` .j Independence Pa . ; .,,,,. —Iii 7 ti I • a4'' • ' f . kehatrak‘ O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap to Trailhead/Marker MIMI Connecting/Nearby. Existing Trail January 11,2021 B.22 44, tiro 8 Mary's Creek Trail - Central Mary's Creek Trail- Central Key Map rating: 2.5 Location. Flanking an industrial park on the north �^ and east side and ending at a trailhead on the north l " side of Magnolia Parkway lies the central branch of Mary's Creek Trail. - -� Access and Convenience. Trail access is provid- N ed from the off-street parking area at Centennial Park Trail. Comfort. The 0.9-mile trail is smooth with gentle cross slopes. Shade is only provided along a short segment of trail where there are large treets along - — the trail. Along the entire length of the trail, grass _. _ is overgrown and covers the edges. The southern- most section of the trail has a trailhead with a way- 1 ' I I finding sign at Magnolia Road where pedestrians _ ____--- are able to locate their position and use amenities such as benches under an overhead shade struc- ture, waste receptacle, and a drinking fountain. Safety. There are no lights along the trail, so eve- ning use is limited due to safety concerns. Ir Ease of Mobility. The 10-foot-wide concrete trail is wide enough that pedestrians and bicyclists can •r both share the trail at the same time. - Image Source:Halff Associates Remedial Recommendations: Add two shade trees across the trail and one drinking fountain at the wayfinding sign for pedestrian comfort. By grouping the bench and lighted bollard with a clus- ter of three trees spaced in a triangular pattern and spanning the trail, a pedestrian refuge is created. Add three nodes generally spaced every 1,000 lin- ear feet along the trail for a total of three benches, three lighted bollards and nine shade trees. Mow the edges of the trail to remove the overgrown grass. On the facing page, Table B.9, Mary's Creek Trail-Central, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.9, Mary's Creek Trail-Central, Opportunities for Improve- 7t - - - ment, illustrates recommended improvements. Image Source:Halff Associates B.23 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.9, Mary's Creek Trail- Central, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Benches (Victor Stanley, 6'long, steel 3 ea. $1,750.00 $5,250.00 construction) Drinking Fountain 1 ea. $4,000.00 $4,000.00 (includes pet drinking fountain) Lighted Bollards 3 ea. $625.00 $1,875.00 Trees (45 gal.) 11 ea. $450.00 $4,950.00 Grand Total $16,075.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design *Includes demolition of existing phase. **Includes subgrade and sewer 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.9, Mary's Creek Trail- Central, Opportunities for Improvement Fite Road i ` `{4 '', ,Iltr,j,41 Marys CreeK , _". ^� Park Trail44 (4, 1 r! 4411 0 e_ .- - ' L ..w.. . II-, I , _ . . _ .i.. ..,,,,, . - LY4. .. ..,....:-...,:„ • . - , . . t g ,_zipi. •sen ow. P, _., --................\ ,%, r • A - ....wn. •CIA- { -+-� ..,�„ ` . r I eL , " llf *I "'1 - rt•� -"n` °s:" r► `it' ''' r • , , _ • • • • `' - ,�„y..,�,;.. Magnolia Parkway ; - - .. - itr i�l�� ` ill1ti y'.*"..11l - '4. O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap • Existing Trailhead/Marker •Tree o Bench Drinking Fountain 3 Lighted Bollards INNIM Connecting/Nearby Tree Existing Trail January 11,2021 B.24 t:i re A 9 Mary's Creek Trail - East Mary's Creek Trail-East, Key Map rating: 0.3 Location.The eastern portion of Mary's Creek Trail I is an extension of the Independence Park Trail and \ A is located south of Aaron Pasternak Memorial Park. _ •pt-) p • Access and Convenience. Vehicular access is • available at the parking lot at Independence Park on the western portion of the trail. Pedestrian ac- cess is available at East Mary's Creek Lane on the eastern portion of the trail. Comfort. The surface of the 0.6-mile-long decom- y., i posed granite trail is uneven with significant ruts ` and depressions and is therefore is not acomfort- 4f, ; able surface on which to walk, run or bicycle.Ame- 't'- nities for trail users can be found at Independence - ' Park. 1� ' �_ Safety. Pedestrian safety is high at Independence - '.' k, ' _" "''` Park with the existing park lighting, but there are no ,. . 1 ;, path lights along the trail. lilt- Ease of Mobility. The six-foot-wide trail is difficult . to maneuver as visibilityto other parts of the trail is - '-,- - • +- — limited due to the wide turns around the high slop- ;, ing grassy areas. ,! Remedial Recommendations: Since the trail has winding turns, provide lighted bollards along the Image Source:HalffAssociates portions of the trail that are not adjacent to Inde- . pendence Park, at a spacing of one bollard per 500 -;a -.. ,.. .-41 p •linear feet, for a total of seven bollards. Add node .,; . = -:,,,�,°iX,,• A sign on the eastern entrance at East Mary's Creek •s •�"r r, tkL Lane for trail identification. Remove and replace ... ,:;,� '_1.;, . the entire decomposed granite trail with a new45 w 10-foot-wide trail with concrete curbs. Keep the trail . i�i .•j.u "" • Rp at a six-foot width along the entrance at East Mary's 1 : ' Creek Lane as there is insufficient room for trail - :_ _ • widening. On the facing page, Table B.10, Mary's Creek Trail - East, Order of Magnitude Costs, _ • �.. ! summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.10, Mary's Creek Trail - East, Opportunities for Improve- .,; YL..- - .- •. ment, illustrates recommended improvements. ; ',. -_ t °: t1 Image Source:Halff Associates B.25 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.10, Mary's Creek Trail-East, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Decomposed Gravel trail replacement 3,520 s.y. $75.00 $264,000.00 Trailhead/Marker 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Lighted bollards 7 ea. $625.00 $4,375.00 Grand Total $273,575.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.10, Mary's Creek Trail- East, Opportunities for Improvement 4 if . .11.,..., %. ii., . dfee\. /7.14.4"1 f 0,..,,t,te" ,ihe' it :: ,.dor A.:.,,... — . ' . to. t* t II) *i' et . e ' * it Vf.4* toilsitsr _ Independence' / . 7'4 . ee , 11. s'-:,li Park Trail 4 • ,7 Af**4k' ; 3 . ,.:. .1,10 10.. p.,4 i 411 „:",*, :11)*le NW -- • t i s '�"`' ° ' "'r''!/r ' * /b, 4 e 1, 4,40„, ' . .*`'4 ' 40' #if --.• ' l'af -I'' i '� . ice . J +}F F a '=" _ m' ' ��77r` a ''f°" s it ,dip 117:h C.,04 , , - ,, . ,- , d ip'w .„;4-pir„ vc-iikeiv,.. ,..4. ,. ...- .. -;`,' . lili;4, 0'M, i+st-, -"4". T n °k, �� . Proposed Bridge, - A . ' vitif�r •\ t G ��- connecting to The _ si. - AI• .' � ,; 44411.' Villages at Mary's Cree a y . • Subdivision Trailliiiii , ' '`, ,..1t,40- -, '4/i". *is ". It ''‘ .t..". Alit.- ' '44.*....., .n.4 ' '' IWA.fir . 111116. _ 4 t lit,lat, ,rt), • , „b. ,„,-c • O 40 .railhead/Marker Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Lighted Bollards Connecting/Nearby Existing Trail January 11,2021 B.26 Itk ., :AIL cillit, 10 Mary's Creek Trail - West Mary's Creek Trail- West Key Map rating: 2.0 Location. The trail system lies adjacent to Mary's I _____./l Creek and provides connection points between the l Southwyck residential subdivision and the Cypress - Village Park Trail. is r• Access and Convenience. Pedestrian access to the trail is provided from Magnolia Parkway. Curb cuts and curb ramps are available. Vehicular ac- cess is provided at the Delores Fenwick Nature Center. III Comfort.Traversing the trail can be done with ease s 1 as the slopes are gentle without drainage issues as ' ponding is not present. " Safety. Lighting is provided by the streetlights. - v1,5 . - Ease of Mobility. Mary's Creek Trail consists of aili _ ;:, • . 1.6-mile-long concrete trail of varying widths be- tween six and 10 feet. Numerous informational and 3 directional signs with the trail name are distributed ""` ` along the length of the trail. Nodes with seating, shade structures, drinking fountains and trash re- ceptacles are situated along the trail to offer resting stops for trail users. The trees along the concrete sections of the trail are large and in good condition but do not offer shade along trail. Image Source Halff Associates Remedial Recommendations: Add large trees `,:_ r" along trail for shade at a rate of one per every 500 40 ,; .40 feet for a total of 15 trees. On the facing page, Ta- - `'' _- ._ - ble B.11, Mary's Creek Trail - West, Order of _ • -lit... _ •'"' t Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and r-- j - Figure B.11, Mary's Creek Trail- West, Opportu • - nities for Improvement, illustrates recommended improvements. - ,_ Image Source:Halff Associates B.27 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.11, Mary's Creek Trail- West, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subs irface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Trees (45 gal.) 15 ea. $750.00 $6,750.00 Grand Total $6,750.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. "Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin " Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.11, Mary's Creek Trail- West Opportunities for Improvement Ism . i. - ! .'-y - . Rogers i ..•_ `Pearland Area • ,tit .Y ,� `- 1 - I • r Middle School t •'ad's Club f, • } ---;._,.p.,i:.,, .. :..,'4. z . • . II _ -.-', - ""• .3• . • `. A" ,,.....-:-..-- ..,..- *a.f..*:;;;: _'' r • ..... .. ...1. ...., • . , ..:,.. • , _ t.'r.w r 44 'air )11.''••rt.....'li••• --� .f �� Berry Miller 1 :"c,., 'Y .'�.•/r r ► sf Junior High i E• , {, ,a �t . • I• , �G.� 1 ♦: { , , - �; - 1, ,,.- , a• k 1I. ..-.-- Existin. i - Bridge. .....•., ___ !/ ? Cypress VI .•:., - 1 ,. Park Trai ram .. a' _._ ,.. Marys Creek rn , _ t f 0 t�f Y a" ' rl ' t1t, • , ;. 0�• • r LINA ' . . ,..- ra j= �" r ' • . 1.r 1 - .yr r/tI,. •fa - F , - - r .•...r-r r.'r�.,f.}.a..w..�•.r• ,I • ' r. `�y- .•-s,. �tl _•+•.J-�.. r . • t i, near , �; 4 O •Tree Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap - Connecting/Nearby Existing Trail January 11,2021 B.28 ____Itkx ., .. . . (\e!r_4 alPine Hollow Park Trail Pine Hollow Park Trail Key Map rating: 1 .0 Location. Located within the Pine Hollow subdivi- I —^ sion is Pine Hollow Park which contains a six-foot- l ' wide concrete trail that loops around the park ame- _ nities. ►� , Access and Convenience. Pedestrian access is provided by the neighborhood sidewalk along Pine Forest Drive. Handicapped access is provid- ed using the curb ramp at the private residence at - the cul-de-sac at Pinehurst Drive or at the private t� v driveway of the adjacent resident to the south of '' 1 the park. On-street parking is the only means of ir �, f' '' , ..'"'' ' vehicular access. Ii. - - j{s, Comfort. Trail amenities such as benches, drink- ing fountains and covered shade are shared with park patrons.A bench is provided along the trail but its location lacks shade. Safety. Lighting is provided under the shade struc- ture. There are open views of the park from the street and neighborhood which provides a safety measure compared to the need for additional light- ing. Ease of Mobility.The 0.1-mile-long trail is in good condition and is well-maintained. The small cracks Image Source:Halff Associates along the edges are an indication of normal wear and active use. A new park identification sign with ,,4, dedication plaque is located at the park entrance. Remedial Recommendations: Cracked concrete edging need to be repaired for pedestrian safety. - ••.. Provide direct pedestrian access from Pine Forest - Drive to negate the need for access through the ,1 - adjacent residences. On the facing page, Table ""4114; .. -'- - - _ B.12, Pine Hollow Park Trail, Order of Magni- - tude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.12, Pine Hollow Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illustrates recommended improve- ' ments. Image Source Half Associates B.29 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.12, Pine Hollow Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Curb ramp 2 ea. $1,500.00 $3,000.00 Crosswalk and Stop Bar Striping 1 ea. _ $3,125.00 ! $3,125.00 Grand Total $6,125.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.12, Pine Hollow Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Pine Hollow Park. w.e.: 'ff 'I,, — . 4,' a 7111 ',, ti 1. it, Pine Hollow Park �i .• I, 4„ I .4.,:tw. . • • . _ #01.,. , ,,., As 0 Nik, c' ,‘. • 4 e. ., .. ,. ... , ,. ., _ Sf j .4., iir 41$ , 4. 41k- ,r- „, 1141:f.(.Obi - ', . 4•'..-, • a ft • z>• ./ a O O Curb ramp Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap IIIIII Crosswalk January 11,2021 B.30 ElShadow Creek Ranch Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trail Key Map Nature Trail rating: 1 .6 Et Location. Located near Clear Creek on the North- west corner of Pearland lies the Shadow Creek ti-t7) Ranch Nature Trail. Access and Convenience. Access is provided by off-street parking along Almeda School Road. Pedestrian access to the trail is only available as • a walking or running continuation from The Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch Trail to the west `L, �, or Clear Creek Trail-West, to the east. • Comfort. Trail amenities such as information- = _� i" • al signs, benches, trash receptacles, pedestrian • - • L r bridges and scenic overlook have wooden compo- 1� ~ T • '*'r' ` nents that shows signs of wear and staining.There are no bathrooms, shade shelters,or drinking foun- tains at the trail nodes. The many trees along the trail are in good condition and are evenly clustered but not enough benches are provided under the 1 trees to make them effective as pedestrian refuges. Safety. Lighting for the parking lot is provided by `� , streetlights along Almeda School Road, but addi- tional light in the rear of the parking lot is needed. There are no safety lights along the trail for pedes- Image Sou "alff Associates trians. Remedial Recommendations: Widen the concrete Ease of Mobility. Identity and informational signs trail to accommodate multiple pedestrian and bicycle are located at the trail entrance and along the path usage. Refurbish the informational signs as there are which provides resting nodes for users. On-street cracks on the reading surface.Add drinking fountains parking and curb ramps are provided for trail entry to two of the large trail nodes.Add eight lighted bollards at the cul-de-sacs along the Shadow Creek Sub- with one tree each along the trail spaced at 300 foot division. Mobility is easy as the slopes are gener- intervals, for shade and safety. Replace all wooden ous enough for walking and steep enough to avoid benches and trash receptacles with new weatherproof standing water from rain events. However, the amenities. Replace all rotted wood and components walking surface at the scenic overlook has drain- on the amenities with pressure-treated timber and pro- age issues as there is standing water in the grass tect the wood with paint or wood stain.Add three street which has traveled and settled along the adjacent lights in the rear of the parking lot for safety. On the trail.As the trail is expanded eastward and encom- facing page, Table B.13, Shadow Creek Ranch Na- passes the trail system within the Shadow Creek ture Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes Ranch neighborhood, and connects with the Clear likely costs; and Figure B.13, Shadow Creek Ranch Creek Trail (currently under construction), the 288 Nature Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illus- Gateway District will serve as a destination for pe- trates recommended improvements. destrians and bicyclists. B.31 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Table B.13, Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost — Sign refurbishment 10 ea. $5,200.00 $52,000.00 Drinking Fountains 2 ea. $4,000.00 $8,000.00 (Includes pet drinking fountain) Lighted bollards 8 ea. $625.00 $5,000.00 Light Poles 3 ea. $3,750.00 $11,250.00 (35'tall with anchor bolts) Trees (45 gal.) 8 ea. $450.00 $3,600.00 Grand Total $79,850.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.13, Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trail, Opportunities for Improvement a h; l `,, . "� Clear Creek 'Nit. 194 *-• The Sports Complex at 4 !``� SCR Trail " mi� 4 :, The Sports _AO 4 !..�e AL ` a•y. ,t r . t1,. 4 �r Complex at„. + •` ,.y +,` • • 10. . ► The Shadow Creek Clear Creek SCR .4 • •r•• ... �j f, Ranch Nature Trail Trail-West " - T (currently under F * construction) 01111119 tj y4 + J":‘ s t 0' , iJi'1.1 i , t ; lm ' to.x46" , s - ...:,... .. ittik:,11 1 4 • . optill1H , ,. , . . 4.. • •• .2 ill 4 ''' ' ' a O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Q Refurbihed0 Lighted Bollards Trailhead/Marker Light Poles III Drinking Fountain Connecting/Nearby •Trees Existing Trail January 11,2021 B.32 _40 ,, yt Jot TMSouthdown Park Trail Southdown Park Trail Key Map rating: 0.6 Location. Situated west of the Southdown subdivi- 0 _mil sion and encompassing the Westside Event Center l ' is the Southdown Park Trail. Access and Convenience. Off-street parking is provided for vehicular access and pedestrian ac- cess is provided with curb ramps at the park en- trance, although access from the Southdown sub- division at Country Place Parkway does not have pavement markings. _ Comfort. Large trees flank the trail and provide4--44"1-!-:::::.-1.7:141111113Pilallaillimw-raores-. 1111111911"_ shade for some portions of the trail, but most of the ' .,,.., trail is in full sun (totally exposed). In addition to the _ __ elements previously mentioned, shared park and �' , trail amenities include benches, picnic tables, trash " "''4,!i( receptacles, drinking fountains and bicycle racks. Safety. Lighting is provided within the parking lot — # om _, ' � ' ",_ . and around the park amenities, but the trail does k •— not have path lighting. �� f r Ease of Mobility.A park identification sign is locat- -_ 7- ----- .. -- 4- ed in front of the recreation building but does not s ,1,kV4 A •. $ :a "' x advertise the trail within the park.The concrete trail „'•'y, - .f -~` is 0.8-miles long and five feet wide, and creates a `;ix `.` �*;: • ' . loop around the event center with connection points Image Source Halff Associates to the park elements, including the splash pad, pic- nic tables and dog park. ,, Remedial Recommendations: Add pavement i* AA, }/ markings at the curb ramps and traffic calming de- , , a., vices along Country Place Parkway for pedestrian ` . access from the Southdown subdivision.Add light- ' ' i, 10 ill1111 ed bollards at one per 300 linear feet along the por- tion of the trail furthest away from vehicular areas -I for user safety. One lighted bollard should be locat- _.�.,� ed in proximity to the bench for evening uses. As the trail is short in length, provide shade trees at a • ratio of one per every 500 linear feet for a total of 10 ._ trees for pedestrian comfort. Provide three shade trees in a cluster for the park bench along the trail. On the facing page, Table B.14, Southdown Park Image Source:Halff Associates Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.14, Southdown Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illustrates recommended improvements. B.33 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI—MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.14, Southdown Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification.Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quan- tities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Crosswalk and Stop Bar Striping 3 ea. $3,125.00 $9,375.00 Trailhead/Marker 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Lighted bollards 5 ea. $625.00 $3,125.00 Trees(45 gal.) 13 ea. $450.00 $5,850.00 Grand Total $23,550.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1. Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. ' Includes demolition of existing 2. Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin "Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.14, Southdown Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Southdown Park. • t I • ...,, i . --,. 7-,: .,..-- ilhhMyht,., — . ''7; . 4', r.-^ t � . a . . Country.Place Parkway in` ;ice.;:'' . i -.1;,.*:3 1 00.oat f li • l�% y` ! 'esd :, . - st Southdown Park A ` j 1 '- :- e • ' 111:,_ ' i, • +�V { Y Frontage Road `;r gIIMIIIIIMIIIIIIam ai SH 288 > ..,-..41 ` ' .N,MODI LA... C I1 ill I Crosswalk Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap © Trailhead!Marker Lighted Bollards Trees January 11, 2021 B.34 • t‘i4 � 14 South Gate Park Trail South Gate Park Trail Key Map rating: 2.1 Location. Located within the South Gate subdivision and inside of Southgate Park is the looping trail with l dual walking surfaces of concrete and decomposed granite. 1-173 Access and Convenience. On-street parking is only available with pedestrian access, including curb ramp, is provided along Southgate Drive. Comfort. Medium-sized trees are scattered around the trail but do not offer any shade. Amenities such as a dual drinking fountain and trash receptacles are shared by both park and trail users. Safety. Street lighting is present but does not light the park. Ease of Mobility. At the park entrance the trail is concrete and six feet wide. At the rear of the park the trail is decomposed granite and three feet wide, for a total of 0.4 miles. The trails are comfortable as =� walking surfaces, but their widths are too narrow for more than two people to safely walk side by side or _ opposite of each other. There is grass growing within . ' the expansion joints of the concrete and decomposed granite trail. Although the trail is confined within the park, residents within the South Gate subdivision can Image Source Halff Associates use the trail as a starting, or intermediate point to the Pearland Town Center. Remedial Recommendations: Add an identity sign at the entrance for park and trail identification. Recon- struct the decomposed granite trail with a new 10-foot- wide decomposed granite trail with a concrete border • to contain it.Add benches with trees and a lighted bol- lard along the trail for evening use and trail security. By grouping the bench and lighted bollard with a cluster of three trees spaced in a triangular pattern and span- ning the trail, a pedestrian refuge is created.Add three nodes, spaced every 500 linear feet along the trail. Eradicate the grass within the trail interior. Add three trees each to flank the two picnic tables to provide shade. On the facing page, Table B.15, South Gate Image Source:Half Associates Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.15, South Gate Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illustrates recom- mended improvements. B.35 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.15, South Gate Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification.Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quan- tities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost ' Total Cost Widen decomposed granite trail 1,000 L s.y. $75.00 $75,000.00 Benches (Victor Stanley, 6' long, steel construction) 3 ea. $1,750.00 $5,250.00 Lighted Bollards 3 ea. $625.00 $1,875.00 Trees(45 gal.) 21 ea. $450.00 $9,450.00 - Grand Total $91,575.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.15, South Gate Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to South Gate Park. Pearland 3 Town Center irt �.w»« . � Trails : _- . • Y sz: „� _ Hams Avenue i A South Gate Park P 3 o -,d1 • II, [ (7% . ' A-4,- . ) WWII OM wow w�+� two. Grimes Grimes Avenue 1 - —! ' 141 O 0 Bench • Tree Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap *r Lighted Bollards ®Connecting/Nearby Existing Trail January 11, 2021 B.36 The Sports Complex at The Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch Trail Key Map Shadow Creek Ranch Trail rating: 1 .5 l �^ Location.The trail at the Sports Complex at Shad- ow Creek Ranch (SCR) is a trail that loops around •� the drainage ditch and complements the Sports • Complex. Access and Convenience. Pedestrian access is only provided at Shadow Creek Parkway but not at Kingsley Drive. Off-street parking to the site is pro- vided with the beginning and end of the trail located k ?+ at; at both ends of the parking lot. ,l R Comfort. Amenities, including icnic tables, seat- =111, ing, overhead shade structures and trash recepta- ' Iles, are commonly shared between park and trail users. Trail-exclusive amenities such as benches, . shade structures, and pedestrian refuges are not provided. While large stands of trees are visible north of the trail, there are no trees along the trail to provide shade. Safety. Sports field and parking lot lighting is pro- vided but no lighting is specific to the trail. Ease of Mobility.The 0.9-mile-long concrete trail is 10 feet in width which is ideal for shared pedestri- Image Source:Halff Associates an and bicycle users. The trail is in good condition with easy mobility, but certain areas are close to the 11111111111111111111111111P WI" edge of the drainage ditch.There is an identification , sign at the park entrance on Shadow Creek Park- way.The Sports Complex and trail system is located within walking distance of the Lower Kirby District. Remedial Recommendations: Add benches with trees and a lighted bollard along the portion of trail which is furthest away from the parking lot for eve- ning use and trail security. By grouping the bench and lighted bollard with a cluster of three trees spaced in a triangular pattern and spanning the trail, a pedestrian refuge is created. Add three nodes at - every 1,000 linear feet along the trail. On the fac- ing page, Table B.16, The Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch Trail, Order of Magnitude Image Source:HalffAssociates Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.16, The Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illustrates recommended improvements. B.37 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.16, The Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Trailhead/Marker 1 ea. $5,200.00 $5,200.00 Benches 3 ea. $1,750.00 $5,250.00 (Victor Stanley, 6'long, steel construction) Lighted bollards 3 ea. $625.00 $1,875.00 Trees (45 gal.) 12 ea. $450.00 $5,400.00 Grand Total $17,725.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1. Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each sy:square yard Figure B.16, The Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch (SCR) Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to The Sports Complex at SCR. r i, .a' e,14. • + X I •, nak Ilk . 414 ��r ♦M ,lrilitt("' :47• # ! \ M -. gr. • • The Sports Complex at ,! , F ""` • -Shadow Creek Ranch:•' , ., , t - , '�� The Shadow •t _ - 'Creek Ranch , er _ ► Nature Trail • 4 c , - . i ,, .,� . �_ <.^l —y__, -TAT_. fi ifs — © Trailhead/Marker Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Lighted Bollards Trees Connecting/Nearby January 11,2021 B.38 MINN Existing Trail 16 Town Ditch Trail Town Ditch Trail Key Map rating: 3.4 Location. The Town Ditch Trail is a linear trail f �^ that bisects The Lakes at Highland Glen subdivi- sion and as the name implies, is adjacent to a long drainage ditch. r' tiiZ Access and Convenience. Safe pedestrian ac- cess is provided by curb ramps and pavement markings at Old Alvin Road, Forest Park Lane and Pearland Parkway. Off-street vehicular parking is not provided, plus there are no directional signs to direct users to parking areas. Comfort. Although the trail is wide, there aren't ,6;, ¢, : y= any nearby trees or overhead structures to provide ` r shade. Safety.The only lighting can be found at the street crossing at Forest Park Lane. No path lighting ex- ists along the trail. Ease of Mobility. The 1.6 mile long, eight-foot- wide concrete trail is in good condition and is easy to traverse with gentle slopes. The trail is ideal for exercise but amenities such as benches, drinking fountains and trash receptacles are not provided. Remedial Recommendations: Add benches with trees and a lighted bollard along the portion of trail Image Source Halff Associates furthest away from the parking lot for evening use and trail security. By grouping the bench and light- ed bollard with a cluster of three trees spaced in a triangular pattern and spanning the trail, a pedes- trian refuge is created.Add seven nodes at a 1,000 linear foot spacing along the trail. Consider proved- 1 :.-z-- ing essential amenities such as drinking fountains. � . On the facing page, Table B.17, Town Ditch Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.17, Town Ditch Trail, Oppor- tunities for Improvement, illustrates recommend- ed improvements. r x ; Image Source.Halff Associates B.39 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.17, Town Ditch Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Benches 7 ea. $1,750.00 $12,250.00 (Victor Stanley, 6' long, steel construction) Drinking Fountains 2 ea. $4,000.00 $8,000.00 (Includes pet drinking fountain) Lighted bollards 7 ea. $625.00 $4,375.00 Trees (45 gal.) 21 ea. $450.00 $9,450.00 Grand Total $34,075.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1. Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each Is:lump sum If:linear foot Figure B. Town Ditch Trail, Opportunities for Improvement . F � a_ , ... . ., . , , 7.....,.=...„ a. . . , ,._ ,„,,.., , ile . . .,4 1 \ , 0 44 • I�r . ..+.. ...♦ ' ' ,414 1 R..Y _•-'� - - t7 •b lei ,i.� -. 1 av' r _ - _ xd .- 'ht ei _ '' t '+ r if i.7„r .' - •r Proposed bridge over ,Y ` "0 Clear Creek to connect to tn° I"` ,....,.. 0 '.:r;t rr '" e . . _ d Clear Creek Trail-East a (see page B.11-12) Z < .,,.•._t L �♦f. a o; -Y • c3i . ..... .... -'' ram" 14 • . . . c i , r+ '�. t-Y • '\. .r4 I. • ' -1 t � • \✓ . t ! r / T m s s r t a ' ia ....:.'''.41 .74.:: ...Ai r. i Orange Street r+ *��,•.r.. or r , • . ' •A 'llf .r.., Y'f .Ct. ,i '. d.�, ! •+, ... -..: , •..,.Lfi.�.........R•„y%.i t„,„r 1 , ., • t ' . O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Trailhead/Marker Drinking Fountain Lighted Bollards Trail Addition • Trees January 11,2021 B.40 ___cto At EsTrails at JHEC Trails at JHEC Key Map rating: 1 .6 Location. Located within the open space to the rear of the Delores Fenwick Nature Center and the Stella Roberts Recycling Center are the Trails at John Hargrove Environmental Complex (JHEC). Access and Convenience. Vehicular access is provided with off-street parking at the nature cen- ter. Pedestrian access is provided, including curb ramps, from the concrete trail off Magnolia Road - and Harkey Road. INF Comfort. The decomposed trail is in good condi- tion, but there are many sections that have weeds �r r ; : , f growing along the concrete edging.There are large t `� stands of trees scattered around the trail, but none . are located close enough to the trail to provide shade. Safety.There is no lighting along the trails for eve- ning use. The trail's distance away from Magnolia Road provides safety from vehicular traffic. Ease of Mobility. The 1.5-mile-long trail consists , primarily of an eight-foot-wide decomposed granite . trail with concrete edging.A concrete trail provides a connection point to Magnolia Road and Harkey Road. Although there is not a park identification Image Source:Halff Associates sign, there are informational signs along the trail itself. Remedial Recommendations: Eradicate the weeds within the decomposed granite trail. Add ' ram. - benches with trees and a lighted bollard along the a - {= 01114, •. trail for evening use and trail security. By grouping the bench and lighted bollard with a cluster of three trees spaced in a triangular pattern and spanning • the trail, a pedestrian refuge is created. Add six nodes at a 1,000 linear foot spacing pettern along the trail. On the facing page, Table B.18, Trails at JHEC, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.18, Trails at JHEC, Op- aw, ; portunities for Improvement, illustrates recom- itt, �, c, � mended improvements. Image Source.Halff Associates B.41 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.18, Trails at JHEC, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification. Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Benches 6 ea. $1,750.00 $10,500.00 (Victor Stanley, 6' long, steel construction) Lighted bollards 6 ea. $625.00 $3,750.00 Trees (45 gal.) 18 ea. $450.00 $8,100.00 Grand Total $22,350.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each Is:lump sum If:linear foot Figure B.18, Trails at JHEC, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Ttrail at JHEC. pg lr Edible Fruit Trail ' ._ , .,, art , , t , ,, Mary's Creek -� a'Magnolia Pmy Trail-West , -,. t } '1' Delores Fenwick ..` — = t KKK]]]✓✓✓ ,Nature Center �+: 111.i * '" 'i f r t ,k isI _ t M .'' Ali ' �� EI alli Trails at John Hargrove �,. _t. 4 I Environmental Complex 4r- '- .. ) t �T il 1 - ` =s Pt • . . • * 4 ' 4.AIIIVIO 'AAA lAr, % 1 si?s, -.% a 7si ' A 41 .i _——-- .- ,. .11 . tr. w . is. r 1 1 '. . . O • Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Existing Trailhead/Marker • Tree 0 Bench mom Connecting/Nearby 3, Lighted Bollard Existing Trail January 11, 2021 B.42 18 Woodcreek Park Trail Woodcreek Park Trail Key Map rating: 1 .5 Location. Located at the intersection of Winding Creek Drive and Crane Street, directly south of the Woodcreek subdivision is Woodcreek Park and trail. Access and Convenience. Pedestrian access to the park and trail is provided by a foot bridge that crosses Mary's Creek.Vehicular access is on-street parking from the Woodcreek subdivision. Comfort. The trail is in good condition but has *. weed growth in several areas within the trail. An identification sign at the park entrance signifies '. the site's location as the park and trail are hidden • .• "•;'. . 4' :.�' • behind Mary's Creek. As there are few large trees overhanging the trail and benches, the trail would -,s.,e ,.+�,".!�! +: -- benefit from the addition of more shade trees. Trail —" J amenities include a bench and trash receptacles. Safety. No lighting in the park is provided. Ease of Mobility. The 0.1-mile walking trail is a 10-foot-wide decomposed granite trail with con- crete edging that loops around the play structure µ ' and swing set. Remedial Recommendations: Add pavement Image Source:Halff Associates striping for the safe crossing of residents to the north of the park. Eradicate the noxious weeds with- F , - 0-), . - in the trail and prune any under-story limbs which • may provide a safety hazard for trail users. As the trail is relatively short in length, adding four lighted bollards at principal quadrants of the loop, will pro- . ---- vide path illumination and safety.Add seven shade ��r- --- trees, 100 feet on center, along the trail for shade. — — — On the facing page, Table B.19, Woodcreek Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.19, Woodcreek Park - Trail, Opportunities for Improvement, illustrates recommended improvements. : 4.4 Image Source.Halff Associates B.43 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.19, Woodcreek Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification.Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quan- tities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Crosswalk and Stop Bar Striping 1 ea. $3,125.00 $3,125.00 Lighted bollards 4 ea. $625.00 $2,500.00 Trees (45 gal.) 7 ea. $450.00 $3,150.00 Grand Total $8,775.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin ** Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each Is:lump sum If:linear foot Figure B.19, Woodcreek Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks.Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Woodcreek Park. mIliNior Sleeping _ i€. . r ma's reek --"f ' y •! i . 411,- _ -le • eek P 1. 4Y2r: f> 7 I w .. i le .f > 1 1� gyp �111111 O Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery'Nearmap Crosswalk Lighted Bollard Tree January 11,2021 B.44 19 Zychlinski Park Trail Zychlinski Park Trail Key Map rating: 0.6 .a.,7._ ^ Location. Zychlinski Park and trail is located north ICI � of East Jasmine Street between N. Grand Boule- vard and N. Park Avenue. - t. ' . Access and Convenience. Pedestrian access is provided by curb ramps at all corners, but there are no pavement markings for the ramps. Vehicular ac- cess is provided from the adjacent school. Comfort. The trail serves to connect the park and trail amenities such as a play structure,a basketball +R • s .k,, court, benches, picnic tables, a trash receptacle --•4 and drinking fountain. Large shade and ornamen- • tal trees provide enough shade for pedestrians with the exception of a singular bench along the trail that i does not have shade. •: - _ . _ - Safety. No lighting exists for path or park users. Ease of Mobility. A dedication plaque is located along N.Grand Boulevard.A park identification sign is not present. The 0.2-mile-long trail loops around the park and is comprised of concrete at six feet in width. Remedial Recommendations: Add pavement markings for pedestrian crossings at street inter- sections. Add one lighted bollard within all four Image Source:HalffAssociates quadrants of the park and one in the center side- -- _ < walk bisecting the site for a total of five bollards. ., ;.. ... This will provide safety for evening trail users. This j -►.�s? ` ' limited amount of lighting in conjunction with the ex- _ - �" 4. R r fisting streetlights is sufficient as the park is small. '1•,',.'•'• ii Add a cluster of three shade trees each at the exist- „ , ri , • ` ing park bench and dedication plaque. On the fac- ; 1, i 4. ' ing page,Table B.20,Zychlinski Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs, summarizes likely costs; and Figure B.20, Zychlinski Park Trail, Opportuni- 411C_ --'- ` •. ties for Improvement, illustrates recommended improvements. ._ Image Source:Halff Associates B.45 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN APPENDIX B Table B.20, Zychlinski Park Trail, Order of Magnitude Costs Costs are for order of magnitude estimating purposes only and are subject to refinement and verification.Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction(i.e.,unknown subsurface conditions.)Quan- tities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Crosswalk and Stop Bar Striping 2 ea. $3,125.00 $6,250.00 Lighted bollards 5 ea. $625.00 $3,125.00 Trees (45 gal.) 6 ea. $450.00 $2,700.00 Grand Total $12,075.00 Notes: Does not include mobilization costs 1.Unit costs include 10 percent contingency for pre-design phase. *Includes demolition of existing 2.Unit costs include 15 percent fee for surveying,design and construction admin **Includes subgrade and sewer sf:square feet ea:each Is:lump sum If:linear foot Figure B.20, Zychlinski Park Trail, Opportunities for Improvement . Refer to Appendix A,Park Conditions Assessment of the Parks,Recreation,and Open Space Master Plan for additional information and improvements to Zychlinski Park. # „..-- i= . ., - A., ". ,: - .' • ili I' m a .i to, r (9 Elb‘ . , li Zychlinski Park , . .i.4 ,,,i4011 i r r..r..r• ',• 11 �. 4 i . " .,.jilh.-....,"9,., e.wtc M.. i t i 4 �' O I I I I11 Crosswalk Note:drawing is not to scale.Aerial Imagery:Nearmap Lighted Bollard Tree January 11,2021 B.46 Conclusion In conclusion, a successful trail system depends Ease of mobility was rated high as most trails were on having addressed and fulfilled key categories 10 feet in width which provided adequate space for such as comfort, safety, ease of mobility and con- multiple types of users. Most trails also contained venience.As previously mentioned in the Condition entry, directional and identification signs which in- Scale and shown in Table B.2, Trail Conditions creases legibility and users are able to stop and Assessment(page B.7), in evaluating the 19 trails read the signs. that span 16.1 miles within the City of Pearland's trail system, an overall rating of 1.5 was achieved Trail convenience is pretty good as many trails are indicating a fair rating. The highest rated trail was connected to one another creating an extensive Independence Park Trail (0.5)and the lowest rated network. Linkages to parks and residential areas trail was Town Ditch Trail (3.4). are primary destinations of the trails. However, there still needs to be greater connectivity between The comfort level of the trails varied dramatically as trails and sidewalks. There is also a need for more the concrete surface material was in great condi- trailheads - places from which to embark on a trail tion for walking and bicycling while amenities such system. as drinking fountains, buildings and pavilions were adequately provided. A significant shortcoming of As previously stated, the two primary elements that Pearland's trail system is the lack of shade along are most deficient were the lack of trail accessibility the trails. There are long sections of trail that are by pedestrians and the lack of lighting for evening totally exposed to direct sunlight and do not provide visibility and security.As the recommendations are any protection from ultraviolet radiation. Forcing us- implemented, Pearland's trail system will quickly ers to be fully exposed to the sun in South Texas overcome its deficiencies and obtain an excellent for long periods of time will significantly reduce the rating. viability of an otherwise great trail system. Safety measures varied greatly as most trails had vehicular access, yet pedestrian access fell short as many of the trails were only accessible by vehi- cles. To have a strong trail system, pedestrian ac- cess to each trail needs to be provided. Some trails received a low score because of a lack of lighting, which reduces the time when a trail can be used, particularly in the evening hours. Unless the intent is to encourage daytime use only,the importance of lighting as a safety measure is paramount as users may want to take a walk in the evening after work. B.47 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN t. litt ilk • �� ,, ' 1+ , (r. •CLEAR �, - t; - , j- . 4 "'. - ► !a, , . CREEK �• � ,s t 4. .°,. ,1 TRAIL '' ;.AAf);.i. 4, ' : '- r _� 4 �._,0 + 1 rye►,' /l!{Rry4 • _ - •r,-4.. Nj�Y , 'ai ,, a �.• -• Ve '1,•. ` �, 1 I 1i 'f7j'�� f! .. •'; .r^rl�,. to !�4. t( t`i j• • , s �, - \! I , : r -i -,,1, ; 'fit -r. . ' � . . . 111 -...,. , ,. ... „..,..,.,,,, • A, 4:. •- tiil•" A i,4it — k ' I 1 _ may_---�- `Y 1`' - .'$., � _� - r 4`t* 4... . Broadway } • - _r, y�;, i _. • t Streit to i 1, } , !N SA 4j;j',,.A Humes •�' it * Road '� '4,.• ?t •, i y • r .a,.:. L.�,4" .� �, +: .., X6� 1f�: ti i��,' _ fir-¢'ITS ' c. 42.10 V CD .. I . I k • C J n '' AI , il, otiV ,., January 11, 2021 B.48 Trails Condition Assessment U Centennial Park Trail (1 .0) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Parking Informational and Directional) 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to location Comments: Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.49 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment © Clear Creek Trail — East (1 .6) Date: 02/23/2020 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.50 Trails Condition Assessment O Clear Creek Trail — West (N/A) Sidewalks and Trailk Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition. surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification.. 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.51 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 4 Corrigan-Woody Trail (2.9) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.52 Trails Condition Assessment © Cypress Village Park Trail (3.0) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.53 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 6 Edible Fruit Trail (1 .6) Date: 02/23/2020 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition,surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11, 2021 B.54 Trails Condition Assessment Independence Park Trail (0.5) Date: 02/23/2020 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.55 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 8 Mary's Creek Trail — Central (2.5) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.56 Trails Condition Assessment g Mary's Creek Trail — East (1 .6) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present Comments: 4 No trees exist Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.57 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 10 Mary's Creek Trail — West (2.0) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: Includes benches, trash receptacles, drinking 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed fountains and pear sculptures Comments: Concrete trail are 6', 8'and 10'in width Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms Trees 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users 01 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to little shade access 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Includes trail nodes with shade sails, seating and Comments: trash receptacles Parking Wayfinding Signage (Identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces Informational and Directional) 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach information and direction 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required numerous vehicles 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access location 4 No wayfinding signage exists Comments: Comments: Wayfinding and educational signage on site. Trail Pedestrian Accessibility Lighting 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through wayfinding adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only traffic 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: Comments: Handicapped access off street. January 11,2021 B.58 Trails Condition Assessment 111 Pine Hollow Park Trail (1 .0) Date: 07/24/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Parking Informational and Directional) 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.59 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 1E1 Shadow Creek Ranch Nature Trails (1 .6) Date: 07/25/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition,surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Requires widening Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Parking Informational and Directional) 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.60 Trails Condition Assessment Southdown Park Trails (0.6) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.61 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 14 South Gate Trails (2.1) Date: 07/25/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are ° required 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present Comments: 4 No trees exist Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.62 Trails Condition Assessment EsThe Sports Complex at Shadow Creek Ranch Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.63 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 16 Town Ditch Trail (3.4) Date: 07/24/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are o required 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.64 Trails Condition Assessment im The Trails at JHEC (1.6) Date: 08/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition,complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.65 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN Trails Condition Assessment 18 Woodcreek Park Trail (1 .5) Date: 07/01/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition,surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition, surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: January 11,2021 B.66 Trails Condition Assessment 19 Zychlinski Park Trail (0.6) Date: 07/02/2019 Sidewalks and Trails Trail Amenities (Benches, Drinking 0 Great condition, surface is in good condition and is ADA Fountains, Bicycle Racks) accessible 0 Many trail amenities are provided 1 Good condition,surface beginning to crack and heave with 1 Trail amenities are provided but additional are required minor repairs needed 2 Trail amenities are provided but not easily visible 2 Moderate condition, surface requires moderate maintenance with visible safety concerns 3 Trail amenities are provided but are difficult to access 3 Poor condition, unsafe surface that requires replacement 4 No trail amenities are provided or reconstruction Comments: 4 Very poor condition, complete reconstruction needed Comments: Buildings, Shelters, Pavilions, Bathrooms 0 Many buildings and shelters are provided for trail users Trees 1 Buildings and shelters are provided but additional are 0 Many large existing trees providing 75%trail coverage required 1 Many large existing trees providing 50%trail coverage 2 Buildings and shelters are provided but not easily visible 2 Many existing trees but located away from trail providing 3 Buildings and shelters are provided but are difficult to access little shade 3 Few trees exist but and are too small to provide shade 4 No buildings or shelters are present 4 No trees exist Comments: Comments: Wayfinding Signage (Identification, Informational and Directional) Parking 0 Many wayfinding signs are present for trail identification, 0 Off-street parking provided with sufficient parking spaces information and direction 1 Off-street parking provided with few parking spaces 1 Wayfinding signs are present but additional are required 2 Off-street parking provided but difficult to reach 2 Wayfinding signs are present but not easily visible 3 Only street parking available with insufficient space for 3 Wayfinding signs are present but are difficult to access numerous vehicles 4 No wayfinding signage exists 4 Only street parking available, but safety hazard due to Comments: location Comments: Lighting Trail Pedestrian Accessibility 0 Trail has sufficient lighting for pedestrian safety and wayfinding 0 Trail is easy and safe to access without vehicular use 1 Lighting is provided for parking area only 1 Trail is easy to access but requires walking through 2 Lighting is provided by streetlight only adjacent residences and commercial/retail areas 2 Trail is accessible but requires crossing light vehicular 3 Lighting is not provided to trail, but located in distance traffic 4 No lighting exists, presenting an unsafe condition 3 Trail is accessible but requires crossing heavy vehicular Comments: traffic 4 Trail is inaccessible without the use of a vehicle Comments: B.67 CITY OF PEARLAND MULTI-MODAL MASTER PLAN