R2018-170 2018-10-08 RESOLUTION NO. R2018-170
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pearland,Texas, authorizing the
City Manager or his designee to submit five (5) project applications to the
Houston-Galveston Area Council for inclusion in the 2019-2022 Transportation
Improvement Plan, and allocating matching funds for the construction of each
project.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to submit five (5)
project applications, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, to the Houston-Galveston Area
Council for inclusion in the 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Plan.
Section 2. That the City's proposed share of the local match for each project is described
in Exhibit "A".
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 8th day of October, A.D., 2018.
.:=::>L11/ 24.;)
TOM REID
MAYOR
ATTEST: """'
fi
ONC
CI SECR ARY
APPROVED AS TO0e4
FORM:
'
DARRIN M. COKER
CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT A
ill
Funding Estimated
20%City
Project Name.' Limits Year in Total Project Contribution
CIP Cost
Bailey Road Veterans to South Main Street 2019
Expansion $18,100,000 $3,620,000 $14,480,000
Max Road Estension Hughes Ranch Road to McHard 2022
Road $12,550,000 $2,510,000 $10,040,000
Harkey Road Broadway to Bailey Road 2022
$28,450,000 $5,690,000 $22,760,000
Kingsley Road Broadway to Beltway Frontage 2021
Road $16,312,000 $3,262,400 $13,049,600
Sub-Total Streets $75,412,000 $15,082,400 S60,329,600
Independence Trail Broadway to Independence 2021
Park (PISD Route) $3,750,000 $750,000 $3,000,000
Total $79,162,000 $15,832,400 $63,329,600
Memo
<s To: Clay Pearson, City Manager
9/27/2018
From: Trent Epperson, Assistant City Ma .ger To: Mayor and City
I xs Council members
�sT
10% CC: Jon Branson, Deputy City M. ager New round of Federal TIP funding
Robert Upton, Director of - gineering & C through HGAC coming up. We are
Skipper Jones, Assist., Director Capital 'improvements on five projects. Plus,
Date: September 27, 8 supporting one being led by Brazoria
County. Clay
Re: 2018 TIP Call for Projects
The Houston-Galveston Area Council — Transportation Policy Council has issued the
2018 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Call for Projects, which will commit federal
and state funds allocated to the Houston-Galveston region to implement highway, freight,
transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects. Approximately $920 million of funding including
the local match is available for programming for the 10 years (FY2019-2028). The
application process began on September 3rd and will conclude a 5pm on October 31st.
City staff has spent the past several months developing and reviewing the scope and
costs for many projects that were then vetted based on the TIP selection criteria. The
strategy in this evaluation was to select projects with the best chance of selection. This
memo provides information on the TIP, the schedule, the selection process,
recommended projects with costs, local projects being submitted by others, and public
support requirements.
What is the TIP?
The TIP is the Transportation Improvement Program, which is a four year program of
transportation projects for the eight county H-GAC region. It assigns federal, state, and
local funds to projects and is the implementation device for the Regional Transportation
Plan (RTP), which is the long-range transportation plan for the region. The TIP is multi-
modal and multi-jurisdictional and is approved by the Transportation Policy Council
(TPC). The maximum contribution of federal or state funds is 80% of the cost, with
the local sponsor providing 20% of the funds.
Call for Projects Schedule
The Call for Projects opened September 4th and closes October 31st. A detailed
scheduled is below:
Sept 4 — Oct 31, 2018 Application period open
Nov/Dec 2018 H-GAC Staff& TIP Subcommittee project review
January 2019 Draft Project List reviewed by Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) and the TPC
February 2019 30 Day Public comment period
March 2019 TAC Recommendation and TPC approval of funding
commitments
Project Selection Process
The selection process and project evaluation criteria is developed by H-GAC staff and
multiple subcommittees of the TAC and is subsequently approved by the TAC and TPC.
H-GAC then initiates a "Call for Projects" where sponsors develop and submit project
applications for evaluation. H-GAC staff reviews and evaluates the applications with the
sponsors using the project evaluation criteria. A recommended list of projects is
submitted to the TIP Subcommittee for review and recommendation to the TAC. The
TAC makes a recommendation to the TPC and the TPC approves the projects and
funding levels.
Project Selection Criteria
The initial items that are submitted for projects are Pre-Application information which is
used to determine project readiness and a potential schedule based on the current
development stage of the project. This ensures that the project schedule and proposed
funding schedule are compatible. The sponsor must prove that certain readiness items
are completed or will be completed on a pre-determined time frame for the year they are
seeking funds. The Pre-Application information includes Financial Commitment, Public
Support, Air Quality Conformity, Preliminary Design, Public Involvement, Environmental
Clearance, Right-of-Way Acquisition, and Utility Adjustments.
After being evaluated for readiness, the projects will be separated into two categories,
"Major Investments" and "Other Investments", for further evaluation. Major
Investments are projects greater than $100 million in value, which are evaluated using
multiple benefit cost analysis and multiple planning factors. The Other Investment
categories are projects less than $100 million in value, which will be evaluated on a
shorter list of evaluation criteria.
Typical Other Investments will be intersection improvements, roadway added capacity,
new construction, complete streets, transit expansion, infrastructure resiliency grade
separations, regional Intelligent Transportation Systems infrastructure, shared use
paths, etc. These projects will be evaluated on specific benefit/cost analysis and
planning factors for each category of Other Investments.
Commitments Beyond the TIP Timeframe
As was done for the first time during the 2015 Call for Projects, funding commitments
will be made beyond the 4 Year TIP timeframe. This provides certainty for sponsors
that have project timelines that extend beyond the TIP timeframe while retaining
flexibility for the next Call for Projects. The guidelines regarding the funds allocated to
projects during and beyond the TIP timeframe are as follows:
• Years 1-5: Allocate 100% of funds available
• Years 6-10: Allocate 50 % of funds available
Recommended Projects
Based on the City's Transportation Management Plan, traffic counts, the TIP selection
criteria and past experience, staff has developed a list of projects that will be very
competitive in the 2019-2022 TIP Call for Projects.
1. Bailey Road Expansion — Veterans Drive to SH35
2. Harkey Road — FM518 to Bailey Road
3. Max Road — Hughes Ranch Road to McHard Road
4. Independence Trail — Green Tee Trail to Independence Park
5. Kingsley Road — Clear Creek to BW8
Cost of the Recommended Projects
The first four of the recommended projects are all included in the City's 5-Year CIP
funded by the future 2019 Bond Referendum. Kingsley Road was considered as a bond
project but did not make the list. However, based on traffic counts and the Park and
Ride that will be operating from the Shadow Creek Sports Complex it is a very viable
project for TIP funds. Therefore with the exception of Kingsley, the amounts necessary
for the City's 20% matching funds are already included in the City's 5-Year Financial
Forecast. Based on the current estimates the City will contribute approximately
$15.8 million, which will leverage approximately $63.3 million of federal/state
funds to deliver $79.2 million dollars of projects. These are early estimates that will
be updated prior to submission and future CIP budgets will be adjusted based on which,
if any, projects are selected for funding and the programming year. Estimated Total
Project Costs include: Design/Survey, Construction, Construction Management,
Material Testing, Contingency and Right of Way as well as costs for pipeline and/ or
railroad crossings as required for that particular project. The exception is the Bailey
project which does not include any Design or Right of Way costs because there is no
land acquisition and by moving forward with the design in 2019 the project can be
accelerated based on the current project readiness.
Estimated
Construction 20%Ci
Project Name Limits Year Total Project Contribution
Cost
Bailey Road Veterans to South Main Street 2020
Expansion $18,100,000 $3,620,000 $14,480,000
Max Road Extension Hughes Ranch Road to McHard 2023
Road $12,550,000 $2,510,000 S10,040,000
Harkey Road Broadway to Bailey Road 2023
$28,450,000 $5,690,000 $22,760,000
Kingsley Road Broadway to Beltway Frontage 2022
Road $16,312,000 $3,262,400 $13,049,600
Sub-Total Streets $75,412,000 $15,082,400 $60,329.600
Independence Trail Broadway to Independence 2021
Park (PISD Route) $3,750,000 $750,000 $3,000,000
Total $79,162,000 $15,832,400 $63,329,600
Financial Commitment and Public Support
As part of the readiness criteria, the City must show public support for the projects. A
Resolution supporting the projects and the City's share of the funding will be brought to
Council in October 2018 for consideration. In addition to the resolution, we are in the
process of requesting the following organizations write support letters or pass
resolutions in support of the projects.
• Brazoria County
• Pearland Chamber of Commerce
• Pearland Economic Development Corporation
• Baytran
• Congressman Olson
• Senator Taylor
• Representative Thompson
A final Public Involvement process is the Public Comment period on the proposed list of
projects selected for funding prior to the final commitment of funding by the TPC.
City Support for Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Sponsored Project
TxDOT plans to submit two segments of the FM518 widening project within Pearland.
To aid TxDOT in their public support efforts staff will be recommending passage of a
Resolution supporting the project in October. TxDOT will submit the project as follows:
• FM518 —Widening to 6 lanes from SH288 to east of FM865 (Cullen)
• FM518 —Widening to 6 lanes from east of FM865 to SH35
City Support for Brazoria County Sponsored Projects
Brazoria County plans to submit one project of significant interest to the City of
Pearland. The project is the extension of Pearland Parkway from Dixie Farm Road to
CR129 (FM2351). To aid the County in their public support efforts staff will be
recommending passage of a Resolution supporting the project in October
Next Steps
• Staff will prepare the information necessary for project submittal
• Request letters of support and resolutions from other entities
• Prepare a Resolution supporting the project for Council approval
• Prepare Resolutions supporting the TxDOT and Brazoria County projects
• Submit Projects to H-GAC by October 31, 2018
Attachments
• Project Maps
• H-GAC Call for Projects Workshop Presentation
— •w
. 35 —
II - ' -' T%-..:11%.15(4 ,
rk "i_ . �� .. ._....., r, .��• •s r �»s m TIF'Project Li nut..:
`'
I -
r` Tha peered can oats d a study b deferrer.<res a'��- -y r( ® tr.cow d weaning I.:Wm.r;eb current Iwo:; i ...iii , larm m
d roadway to a 4 lana bhrd sscbto ar&
Irevlpus patty Rd pbpetYs.The shale Ma arse
„•,rs et the odOlan cif a row obese gado cross.nu •
.I • •
„ •• over the mined to schen the classed uternala yeah
i tegglarI :f...,..., . • :L.'I.` -e oo iwAds to be used Ls mote for T•Fiyrdi�q
� •
11? •• •
•
�Nxcf ti et gr,
111‘ei 1.!/tIjiril
•
s
i ttff
_ a1_ - The.pnda,t.t ear nNrrn.ntr,4 proper.end
I .
` nut hno teem prepared for or he wiraMr
' t _ ger I.svl nu
.ere vied or•rrvrinR Pepe..l'
v i _ 4._ mot rrpr.•rnc a m lh.Prosed saner..a.1t represents nn h the npprmtt m at.ry.too-to al i n
-r prryr n.6.rtnda.wl
•
1. -r I ' ,' ..r,.I I 1 inch=1.000 feet
_ • FF.r _'hkI::%kV fl
d. ,A�� i {; . _ i_�,.I. WtlDLrPARTMENT
•
. {I._
•
•
•
f"
J •
MAX RD.
• r === TIP Project Limits
, I �.
r �' •-- = Future blcHxrd Rd
I
ill
t
•
mrs:tom
p `. p
' L
1 t $ Nom` i r, `�` +i ' a.
- - ` j ° `
.. •.
..
,..,,,,.....
..,_
1 t‘, - . .. ,
1
.... .,_,,
ac- r^e;fr
. r .-"Ig.;
, -''/' :11. t•t'.
�
"p moi:
i 1r : w
} t•A .. ta-
-:? _".i _i 1 ..jn.+.fvrl M fur In(nantat►nal.ualorr•.and
�£ -- '- �I�f may nut F nn 1..m WWama f.•or I.mntabin
_ G7 n -�"'I hr 1.Aa1..t muw.n, J,.urv.r ug Puepa+..In
k O a tr...nut npnamt an nn In.pr..und...v..,...I
` �'3 't4+ 1u� vCGi���f a 'a , nprmrrela only tn..p.prtan m ate Malne I,u anon
d ;Y1 t - .. .d'Inntxrn b.�nda.0-•.
ttio.
i t rr�yvte�:ty( a 7 a t
.+ _ , _ _.__ '-'1 1 inch=667 feet
.1._.%-3 • `s 14 Weijt 1f �>i� - a a APR11,241n111 11
i' +- 111A DEPARTMENT
6
i ..t. �,LM j .; Sri ;; 1 `, • _ __._ __. -_.. _. _.__..._
• .- / m`did»p4ytna�,� •: `�
'.' ' HARKEY
; nt �, ' At t.r• ' 'ate
fp # .. a �otwy.sr �,�r
� r
Mir
4 e ua r1 :mar KEYRD
'il,e I s i- 1.,;.�t .;p; ._ -. _ TIP Projmt Limits
•
•
_ L-.10---. :a4 �.'ll 1t,:... 1 ' _ R VNlcl an.illa.M eanAf'b QeMnnuae
17. *41 f • ...
-. `• 1.- t: tV cost W*Wan les lniGnq 3 Ivo Iw.lr lr
1 T! M..�1 I i ` 1 ir ! t re a 4.an•otM s.cEQn w achieve er uty a
1 �d ' t a
.: .44''� 1 QG4n00 JaTa1P*with tela catty MM ba mart a1 appy
b IIP LnBnp
' ' t. _. " • _
rip
'• , - '
tr # 1-
i C-1—/
Y 'j1, •
3 l !1-�-s .t- - '
•
_a - _� _ -t , Rr • R-i_r-.._�_.i.-+-1—e„}'. .' 7• 'Ih..pr•Jwt.•to inlmm,et.n,l p..q..•i•.•nd 4,
- ' ••1- Y _ 1 t mai nm h y:L.m pr.p•r�for u b•Jit4bk
' 1 ! lu lr.I..nlrwc vires.a•urv.l Iap purp.e•.h
_ _I r.. i d.•.rest vvpn•.nt an.:,IA.yr..und.rn+..nJ
ml•only IM approalmarr Mth,-I•aln,n •
7 ^ - •11 • ' a�,[�•r.-�-1 rt 77+�....,i , RpM .!properly bun la.w•
�'111!Ilik- '' _. 7. ."^r- .1 .. -,. i-}7{ t tr`
i i % • 1 1 _� j l inch=1.667 feet
' ' .I.. 4 A.�
[ . ----- 1.. - -- � r _p r l) J.
t-::'"1"'
' I �• FEBRUARY lilt
IV:If, t i id 1)El'ARTMEAT
3 rS. `. - - { J a
,F.i.jiy ,rr r G J\ "f9Per �
s 4 7• ~ • �:9r i ce` '' a ,* ' •le
4. ti.,-....)::::000,. ..\ ' TRAIL CONNECTIVITY
41. ..... . . f :f',�„�,, v 4 ,PHASE IV
VI 4 r`�'11,,o.,
i.,,� V f� �.• N � , 1 Independence Trail
I /
}i1 N • is - /�,� � . ► �Via. - �t. . le*/ k LI%.;r a
X .�af'I }..`T/J • �v+� �4,i� J'�nn Option 1
a•4` /n., ,F'/ '. ''/ - A . , 'Id Jd .' v c, ` `• -Option 2
404
vi4 ,...4... ., .
1 ' , .'► " . i- jr=, I ,eke,
iiimitiii,,. '\
1 1%,At e. 8, .M' 1131
w, i • `� Thm.c not h v I. prepay.'F.., I. r rl.•
.• ''L_'• ...``•f' yr w • y� A.111.
' '• �:. T A. i �.( CA'Rl •• for 1.Fal..n✓uu.riAY.u.wv.1 inp luuN`.1.
.. tl 1 , it yr. Y�* -. t911. V': } • trptoncooo •onhtorso O c sn:troll.ground ry..l.J
...�LILCCCl11�000���,,, �,,f ��ff••� yv�yt _ P+^+ml.onh'Ow uDp••rtl mat.n•lahr�l u al,.
� e A 4 .A. i^/ ti a .4 prop.•rty he 4.1114.40104
, •' 1tF n ! t 1 inch=625 feet
`` '} qty A r �' * N .' $1,1.113,1RY.R a'I.
baa,.
y,� r i,_
y 5 �
KINGSLEY DR.
y+ Jr.€ y-;,- --s4 TIP Project Limits
4
'' �, e
-. It.
•9. i . _ .e..t 1
�� `' t rl�e prGau cansyla d e away w aatnrc�n.
,_ ! i 3� 1 ........ "A +acRmr. 1r.oat b,.m.n sc aa:aGng 2�e1y lwsrav
i' 1 Lc a i lana oMd.Action to xniavu 7w cAy o
Ir r/'"1 '•� °Puma Oman aaplp Ing GnRy. MlR no tKaa 11 appy
-- PP,TIP lurbnq
it a
1,!R -. _. ..,4- r., , INF— t, a.R Y:t. -'# ".' '
.
r
i 3 Ia.1 •41*• �'t
tijU — a ,
far�lfi 3rev.. I, j
.z.� �{, �_2 co —
'na.pnalv.t a far inrnrraae.onai p n .nd
it ar'---, _• �y _1 -,a - mar nal harm#ayml propenyl far L .tAle
• . far 1.tml.ntnrkrnny[.0 nay.nN pup-:. - I'
by nal n'pr.••ent An...IA.111 4114 .and
t 'I # .vptnenl.ante thennt
applmaar m1r
1a1 .I.4 al,.�
ate ' f 11 1 ./pnty.-n.•k.unAan.y.
' 14;7411111111*HI'"'il'7..
d-,,,,,,-,-4,,,,....._=,-, . 1 inch=667 feet
i...,,,,...740,,,_ +
7 µ VII. q
as . ',Rh/WARY Wrr
MA ll1PAR7MFAT
- ,-.
°`a �-'-e •t`'�,4;Yro :47;r 4 4,xr6gL a • u",, 31'0170 ' I'tl, N-',r �,,
♦ , f yA� K y
E} r � .Ii--0:-..--, .1w
_ L'i� ~'T •' e. Ki 4' ✓ +f"'YR by y ':'X r �r
�" "�T'�p =':� y w '"t ,; PEARLAND PKWY
___ ,,, s+," .,,,A.:-.4..,
Y ,._ .� •
- ,... ,•. rr /.),f . ,, # EXTENSION
,, ,, •r k. . . tee• i �v
vtl--if' 'I4,,-,40-71 - . "41,q-• , . (' ' • ' Z- 1.•-• ',,; ... - • - , ..e -- , /
� r . ',,' 4. ` ;" •' + 1 :� �'' '� Dixie Farm Rd
' '`�,grit ., . �� f. ' y? , ,.K • r".4Ai, ' '� to CR 129
,14::,!,
.-fir .. -- � '/ ! 1 'r µ't✓- 1,41 • '\ J .rpt�oR. 'y
C
-
,��yy _ � aL. s ,� > ' y: . ����1Jy'�Tf..�+ 1�•�1�(�i� , . � Road Extension
'1:7 y:` Y''', '''`t �.( .r `'' - 'yaw
1J i
e., 111• .. - . ' `., f,' -.! 3 \ t r �
vitk.
!!4 OST-.. . , - Y t • ��� , A
t ` V S r ',
f : • +t " •
' Regional yy6f, .�. - ;i
r + _ tai; E'.» t:Lf1R.:Jli�1 F'
k - {. P, a + This product is for informational purposes and f
i �' may not have been prepared for or be suitable
► f for legal,engineering,or surveyingpurposes.It
=' ,.
••1 •� y ., does not represent an on-the-ground survey and
! . 1'u e r- s„ represents only the approximate relative location
r IR
r of property boundaries.
•
; A 1 _ 1
i •_.i-' =s- -.,. •
1 inch = 1,667 feet
• 3 '
.� SEPTEMBER 2018
w'' ' syr,-� �' GIS DEPARTMENT
• ' " ,.-
- '' ''"*"- ' sir 1"4, , \ \Alf' , . , ..,- ,•41. .. . . ' .. . ,• ,i, . ,.
• ',.?'* ' . :.'s')''sj ' ' •A .0 f , •
: ,: !C., ..1 -4. -
,.:..,q,- ,i5i:N -,. „..4t,.s.A... ••.! _
.......
,, , , •., . !,.. ,,. , . J
-,....--.....? ,f )
'‘. '. 'n.' ?,,:''.' : ,
' ,'1.!;..* 4:' '' !filv: 'i:k,‘-..,, : :, A '
IIIIIMMOIMigir'
. Z1,.. . .i.
NVI,,,.,,,•.'• •f .
, . .,,,.„it .410.,.. i I:.
, '..
`-J7)••' 1,z‘ " , „,„ _.-.4„.. .
. _
: ai •,- ..,,1 . , ' -
. -
„, •',
11. -.1: r; , ,---— -
,
,., .
".,.., . . . s_ ..,..,....,
...
. ,
,, ; i , : 4.
f , ,
i I
l .. ,Aiiir., • __ .: . . 4 P-. _...Z_ 400 k• -..-'
. , • -...•"-• .. • .„..... ...,... . . .,..._ ... .. ... .,, ..,-. ....
. .. • . .
2018 Call for Proiects
Workshop
Wor •
• .
'
-. „ _. .., , • . ..-.,
•- ' •
-' : 1 4° • ; s' Y - _ , r •
1 g' 4 ''.—ta"'.;-`:-.,.____:—."'";*7.------..------- ---. _ ft 1.141 T, --; , ' :It,
,. ..... ....„ - r . i- - . i- -
__ ,
,--r,' .....,., _... ..., ,
...... ......1_,.......„....._,..: . ' -ill . .-, .
oinsemnion. ...,
- "' -..- ..• ^ '-- .. - ' .„ t' ' ...... • .,',....i.
- -.C..-- -' ••• r",..• 1 ' .'I' . '' . •'' r
• - -.,— _
. ,.. , it 4 0 Apr -
7 - . ....,- 0, ..
aiircomil.....;,11'
- .9 ti Nig) •
Ant -AK'
1 •--.------ ________
.._ . __
r•-,...---•„. *. -.;1, I' '. 611111118 -—---.--_ ___ -.
et% 1
. • - . ' .., 1114100-11w
.....,.: .... • - ___ . . ••••.......
Ada m Beckom ts u 0 •, . al
. \.
._
,, .... ..
. .
September.1 1,-201 8 i ..,",. ' ' ' ----- ii t„.. '1- ."
„ ..
, ._. ...
Iiilf f 110PC1111611
PIANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility 0/61\MIZATION
2018 Cciii for Projects - WorkshopI
Agenda
Overview
Project Selection Process
Evaluation
Application Process
Templates
MlT•OOIITAN
MANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Moltimodal Mobility
1
2018 Call for Projects - Overview
Call open Sept 4 — Oct 31 , 2018
,Mont•orier'.?
State, Local Govts, Public Ports,
Transit Agencies, Special District
w/Local Govt Support 11111111111
■ Three Time Periods : TIP, 10-Year, RTP o Ben!'
YITIOPOt IIAN
MANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility ouOANI:AfION
2
2018 Call for Projects Schedule
2019
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March
Evaluation Criteria �• •
Evaluation Criteria Workshop • • *
Approve Project Call • *
Application Submission • •
Application Workshop A
Project Selection/Prioritization '1' •
Draft Project List • •*
30 Day Public Comment
Project Recommendation • •*
• TIP/RTP Subcommittee Meeting Application Submission
• Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting Projects Selection/Prioritization
* Transportation Policy Council Meeting Public Comment Period
A Application Workshop
Y II.O.OIItAM
PIANNIMO
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O•GAM17A7101.1
3
2018 Call Projects: Project ScoringI I
50% Benefit Cost Analysis
Safety benefits/Crash Reduction
Reduced travel delay
Air quality benefits
■ 50% Planning Factors
Vary based on type of project
Same for all "Major Investments" costing > $ 100M
Inter/Intra Reg Mob.; Multimodal LOS.; Resiliency.;
State of Good Repair.; Economic Competitiveness.
M11NO►OU7AN
•IANNIN6
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility OICAMIJATION
4
Other Investments Categories
Access Management/ Rehabilitation/Reconstruction
Safety/Grade Separations Roadway p y Added Ca acit /New
Active Transportation Construction/Complete Streets
AV/CV Infrastructure Transit Expansion
Infrastructure Resiliency Transit Facility State of Good
Innovative Freight Repair
Movement Transit Passenger Facilities
Regional ITS Infrastructure Transit Priority Infrastructure
YIT•OPOIIT•N
•l•NNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility G•G•NI1•110M
5
2018 Call
Prolects: Application Process
Registration
(One-Time Action Per Sponsor)
Pre-Application
(Once- Per Project)
Application
(Once- Per Project)
MIT U O.OIIt11N
•IINNINO
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility ONG•NII•IION
6
2018 Call Projects: Registration
Registration (one-time action Per Sponsor)
Contact information
Primary Agency information
Primary Agency Contact
Consultants Representing Multiple Agencies Need To Register
for Each Agency
Confirmation
Submit a Pre-Application
y Mf7Io►o117iN
/IIN NIMG
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O•G►NIS•/IDN
7
2018 Call
Projects: Pre -Application
Information Required
Additional Agency Information
Project Information
Letters of Support
Project Readiness
Map
Budget
M(TROPOI IVAN ..
•I•NNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility DIGIINIZ•110N
8
2018 Call Projects: Pre -Application
Project Information
Location and Limits
Project Type/Investment Category
Total Capital Investment (Estimated Federal + Local)
Federal Funding Requested
Letters of Support/Funding Commitment
45)
M TAOPO{I IAN
PIANNINO
Regional Collaboration • 1ronsportotion Planning • Multimodal Mobility 0•GRNI7AII0N
9
2018 Cciii
Projects: Pre -Application
Project Development/Readiness
Development/Design
Environmental Clearance
ROW Acquisition
Utility Coordination
Timeline
AI IT•OPO{ItaN
•TANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O•GANIJATION
10
2018 Call Projects: Pre -Application
Location Map
GIS
Shapefiles, pdf, MPK, zip files
Budget
• Federal Request
• Local Match
ITl TIIOt O11 TAN
•{ANNiNG
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimadat Mobility OAGANIT A/IqN
11
All project costs must be entered in 2018$s.Costs will be inflated to programming
Projectg Bud e t year by HGAC staff.
'eject Information
ProjectTkle
County _
• Budget Facility/Street Name
TDCs Requested(Y/N)
Federal Re u estProject Costs("OOOs) Estimated Estimated Project Total
Start Date Completion Date (000s)
Planning/Environmental
Project Phase Design
Property/ROW Acquisition
Utility Relocation
LocaI Match Construction —
Federal Requested --
Local/State Match('000s)
State
• All Costs in 2018 $S Local General Revenue
Other —
Total Match ---
Total Project Cost('000s) --
400
MtTto•o1 n•N
P1•NNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility 011G111411•11014
12
Application
All Investment Categories
Benefit/Cost Analysis
Quantitative and Narrative
Safety Benefits
Delay Benefits
Emissions Benefits
May Provide Additional Benefits
1
_ Mtdl*1O117AN ..
NNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O••{GAAMIl*t10N
13
BCA Templates
All templates are Excel Files
Instructions
Input & Outputs
Input data in Blue and Green Shaded Cells
Calculations, Assumptions, Factors tabs
4Io
MITAOTOII TAN
•TANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility OAGANI;ATION
14
Project
nation Benefits Roadways Project Title:
County
Facility Type
Street Name:
Limits(From)
Roadways Limits(To)
Length(in Miles)
Application ID Number:
Safety Improvement Type Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.):
i • + .IIS - 11-1t *Alt,k •i
Year Open to Traffic?(Must be>=2021)
Existing 2018 ADT Safety Improvement Type
Work Type Code Nr'lfu
Appropriate Crash Reduction Factor(%): itN/A
• If Multiple Improvemenis are Service Life(years): irN/A
Trayma i
Proposed Select theu Volume(A
D
2018 DT
• 2018 Peak Period traffic Volume
Improvement Type That Provides 2018 Peak Period Capacity
Estimated 2025 Peak Period Traffic Volume
Highest Crash Reductions 2025 Peak Period Capacity
Estimate 2045 Peak Period Traffic
2045 Peak Period Capacity
Model Requests Must be OUTPUTS
Discounted Safety Benefits @ 7%(2018$,'000s) aN/A
Submitted by Sept 28th to HGAC
SI IIOlO11 tiN
•iANNIMG
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O•GANI:AtiON
15
Project Information
SafetyBenefits Project Title:
County
Facility Type
Street Name: 1111114
Limits(From)
Active Transportation - Limits(To)
Application ID Number:
Transit Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.):
Type of Improvement YearpOpen to proveTraffic?n :Must be>=20211
Type of Improvement:
Service Life(years): !t(v/A
Estimated New Users in Yearmaimmigim
Traffic Open to Traffic
Average One-Way Trip Length in miles
Estimated Peak Volumes and 2018 Peak Period Traffic Volume
Capacities 2018 2025 and
2018 Peak Period dway Trafficy
Estimated 2025 Peak Period Volume
2045 2025 Peak Period Roadway Capacity
Estimated 2045 Peak Period Traffic Volume
2045 Peak Period Roadway apacity
Model Requests Must be OUTPUTS
Submitted by Sept 2 8th to H GAC Discounted Safety Benefits @ 7%(2018$,'000s) UN/A
NITIOPOI ITAN .,..4
PLANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility OAGANIZA/ION
16
Identification
DelayBene . ItS Project Title:
County --
Facility Type
Street Name:
Limits(From)
Limits(To)
Roadways, Active Transportation Length(in Miles)
Application ID Number:
and Transit Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.):
Existing 2018 ADT Year Open to Traffic?(Must be>=2021
Type of Improvement
• • • Estimated Delay Reductions(in%) UN/A
Service Life of Project ServiceLife(years):
Estimated Free Flow/Avg Speed 2018 ADT
Pea
2018 Peak Period Traffic Volume O
Peak Period Traffic Volume in Year Open to Traffic P. UN/A
Model Requests Must be Submitted by Estimated Free Flow Speed before improvement
Average Peak Period Corridor Speed before
Sept 28th to HGAC improvement
2018 Peak Period Traffic Volume Cl
2018 Peak Period Roadway Capacity
Estimated 2025 Peak Period Traffic Volume
2025 Peak Period Roadway Capacity
Estimated 2045 Peak Period Traffic Volum
2045 Peak Period Roadway Capacity
400
NlTMO/O11TAN
PIAN NINA
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O.GOLNI:ATION
17
Emissions Benefits rm
Project I
Application ID Number: I
Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.): I
Pro-ect Count
Roadway Corridors Year Open to Traffic?(Must bex=,2021)
Type of improvement
Type of Facility
Type of Improvements Total Length of Corridors Effected by Project(miles)
Average Roadway Speed Before Improvement(mph)
Average Roadway Speed After Improvement(mph)
Average Corridor Speed Service Life of Project(from MoSERS) + NN/A
Before and After Total 2018 Daily Traffic Volume for Corridors Effected by proje
Total Estimated 2025 Daily Traffic Volume for Corridors Effe e
by project
Model Requests Must be Submitted Total Estimated 2045 Daily Traffic Volume for COrndors Effect
by project
OUTPUTS
by Sept 28th to HGAC
Discounted NOx Benefits @ 7%(2018 5) eN/A
Discounted VOC Benefits @ 7%(2018 5) +tN/A
Total Emissions Benefit Results
Discounted Emissions Benefits @ 7% 2018 5 aN/A
Total Emissions Reductions
NOx Emission Reductions(tons) aN/A
VOC Emission Reductions(tons) NN/A
14/T•OPOI TAN
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O•GANIJAI`ON
18
Project Information
Emissions Benefits Name:
Application ID Number:
Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.):
Project County
Pro•-sed im•rovements Information
Year Open to Traffic?(Must be>=2021)
ntersection Improvements Type of Improvement
Service Life of Project(in years)(from MoSERS) UN/A
Average Vehicle Delay at Intersection Before Implementation
(in hours)
Type of Improvements Average Vehicle Delay at Intersection After Implementation
(in hours)
Average Vehicle Delay Dail Travel Demand
Average Daily Peak Period Intersection Traffic Volume(6-9
AM+3-7 PM)(2018)
Average Intersection Daily Traffic Volume During Off-Peak
Before and After Hours
2018 Peak Traffic Volume at the Intersection
Estimated 2025 Peak Traffic Volume at the Intersection
Average Peak/Off Peak Intersection Estimated 2045 Peak Traffic Volume at the Intersection
OUTPUTS
Volumes Discounted NOx Benefits @ 7%(2018$,'000s) ' #N/A
Discounted VOC Benefits @ 7%(2018 5,'000s) ' #N/A
Peak Intersection Vo I u m e s in 2018 Discounted Emissions Benefits @ 7%(2018$,'000s) r #N/A
2025, & 2045 XN/A
NOx Emission Reductions(tons/year) • #N/A
VOC Emission Reductions(tons/year) #N/A
r�1
M1110•0111AM
PIANNIMG
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O.GAM17111 oM
19
Project Information
Emissions Benefits Application ID Number: '
Sponsor ID Number(CS],etc.): '
Project County '
u• u •,
Active Transportation Year Open to Traffic?(Must be -2021)
Type of Improvement
Facility Type
Average Roadway Speed(mph)of Improvements Service Life of Project
#N/A
Daily Travel Demand
Average Roadway Speed Number of New Daily Users in Year Open to Traffic
Average One way Trip Length
2018 Peak Period Traffic Volume
Estimated New Users in Year Open 2025 Peak Period Traffic Volume
2045 Peak Period Traffic Volume
to Traffic
OUTPUTS
Average One-Way Trip Length Discounted NOx Benefits @ 7%(2018$) 7tN/A
Discounted VOC Benefits @ 7%(2018$) #N/A
Peak Period Traffic Volumes in 2018 Discounted Emissions Benefits @ 7%(2018$) #N/A
2025, and 2045
NOx Emission Reductions(tons/year) #N/A
VOC Emission Reductions(tons/year) #N/A
1pkD
MIT,O,011 TAN
PLANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O,CAMITAT1001
20
Project Information
Emissions Benefits Name:
Application ID Number:
Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.):
Year Open to Users?
Transit Ve h i c I e Purchase Applicable Project life(from MaSERS)
Route Road Type
Transit Vehicle Model Year
mopi.
Passenger Vehicle Type
Year Open to Users Transit Vehicle Type
Transit One-Way Trip Length(miles)
Daily Transit Vehicle Trips
•
Transit Ve h i c I e Model Year Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 1
Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 2
Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 3
Transit Ve h i c I e Type Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 4
Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 5
Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 6
Average One-Way Trip Length Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 7
Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 8
Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 9
Daily One-Way Trips Estimated Transit Ridership per trip:Year 1C
OUTPUTS
Estimated Transit Ridership Per Trip Benefit Results
NOx Discounted Emission Reduction Benefits @ 7%(2018$) #VALUE!
VOC Discounted Emission Reduction Benefits @ 7%(2018$) #VALUE!
4-Ve/
Y RTRGIGIITAN
•TANNING
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility ORGANIZATION
21
Planning Factors
Major Investments
Inter/Intra Reg Mob
• Multimodal LOS
Resiliency
• State of Good Repair
• Economic Competitiveness
• Major Investments
Varies based on Investment Category
YI TUOVO{1ISM
P{ANN W4
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility O.GANi7A1{ON
22
Project InformationReliability Benefits
Name:
Application ID Number:
Sponsor ID Number(CSJ,etc.):
Year Open to Traffic?(Must be>=2021)
Level of Travel Time Reliability Does the project add capacity(lanes)?
Primary Project Type
Facility Type
Project Information Involves access management?
If yes,what is the street type
Type of Improvement Involves grade separation?
Involves installation of ITS infrastructure?
A DT Do you have a current PTI estimate?
If yes,input a value(must be>=1.0)
Source for PTI estimate(please provide reference link)
Before and After
Daily Travel Demand Before implementation After implementation
Improvement ADT
Number of Lanes
ADT per lane N/A N/A
PTI estimate FALSE FALSE
Estimated reliability benefit N/A
Points N/A
r11•0P011T4.
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility o.c:wli:i ow
23
2018 Call for Projects Office Hours
Sponsors May Schedule Meetings With HGAC Staff
By Appointment Only
Two Days a Week Starting September 25, 2018
Email 2018cfp@h -gac.com
4-!m
Y/TNO1O111.N
Regional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility OSCAN Z `oN
24
2018 Call for Projects
• http ://www. h -gac. com/201 8 - ca Il -for-
p
u l t. a s px
2018cfp@h -gac . com
Vishu Lingala : Vishu . Lingala@h -gac . com
NITROPot i r•N
•{•NNING
Rogional Collaboration • Transportation Planning • Multimodal Mobility ONG N124 tON
25