The URL can be used to link to this page

R2004-198 12-13-04RESOLUTION NO. R2004-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS, ADOPTING AN CORRIDOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FM 518. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS: Section 1. That the FM 518 corridor Access Management Plan., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all purposes, is hereby authorized and approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 13th day of December A.D., 2004. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DARRIN M. COKER CITY ATTORNEY TOM REID MAYOR IC' ' a ok • 0 .'" , :...or, -.,.0 it• • tof . — -1-;-- -- - ?el- -.I, ..,.. I.., c..... .i....,....,,,.. . h.- 1,.'''. .,, • . 'I 'it.,_,,„‘ 11 •. ... - ,,, , • b' 411`i . • V' 1"''• 1 4- . . ___,. ;Il. ..o ill ' -,;14,,,Ito ..--4.-"4- 4.-„_-.,•-i''.r.,.- :-. . :-* :.---_,-, -.F.—. ..-r- __ 4100 . -' • i 4,- , r , tit . -— .. . ..: itlie 0,. . ssi „i4 __ ,..7 i ' Te ADOPTED 09/24/2004 iii.• -: . 1,,L. , ... ..7-1-,- ':--"' = - .. - ' -=-•• eh,Gifc —rioc) - ---:--- 'a '''. ' Identify short-term -----••- -' 4. ''..-,4114 „. --a''''.".•"-'' transportation improvements Soli. FM 51 8 i ilk% ."44:"'e r•-- -',..‘ ,• '.01'....:-.1., ..!,.."4*, ' Corridor Access Management Plan „ . Reduce motorist delay •*Ili , ''-'-•1-41..-r• spretvi 1 . , 1111/1111111 • 4 ,,,,l'• ' - •- ',,elc:, • 7.1-4 ,... . ' ---:---_-_-- _ . .i , # -_ :;,-,*---*---,-- 11.„-1.: fz• , - .,- * Assess long-term corridor n, ..,. . -,2„,,,...4. .. . , -.• .„. Avr...• :•,...-t- - :. oat,!.. t•-•-••- 4-, .. • 1::min Kimley-Horn .• .. ..t. and Associates. Inc _. t --- ' 1 ' I!1,1. . i . • ::-. f 1 ii: . i .''' ls --. :, - In association with _ .,,= . . ...,1 ---,,. .1 • -4i. ‘,...,..,— _* , . . ... - ;- Gunda Corporation, Inc A .1-.16'-i't!sr • , . .,.....,.• .„, ,..„...,„ _ ..... , .,.. • . SR Beard, Inc. r f!..;--1 1 ,. ',11S":1 . ‘,:: • -- : ..... - Jacobs Civil, Inc .....';-' -I i •, 1r . --... of,.... i : r• ;-, --N- • --' '- i,„„ 11314( • 1 , - - _ , - - .....t. -- -•.i 1-'1 • - . ,111 ' i .' i, IV''' ' •-zs LLL_•__P.•:, ,..,,_, -1 - .'', 1' '• •: ' •-:- - ,Texas Department of Transportation . _ _ Intersection Improvements . •• i. .-..,1 '... —T, I"- on .‘11' •.: ' I igiak\ . FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan "Never underestimate the power of a small group of dedicated people "Progress occurs when people cooperate." "Isn't it grand that plans are visionary! Why shouldn't a to change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has " community have a view, a vision of what it wants to be, and —Hal Burton then try to achieve its" —Margaret Mead —Allan Jacobs FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Steering Committee Lead Agency Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) JErry Bobo, H-GAC 11D4C Ilyas Choudry, H-GAC Jamie Cornelius, Sowell &Co Project Manager JErry Bobo Brian Courts, Brazoria County Transportation Department Mathew Hanks, Brazoria County Steering Committee Larry Heckathorn,TxDOT (Brazoria) Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Jennifer HErrold, H-GAC TxDOT Houston Mike Hodge, City of FriEndswood City of PEarland R W Bill Kerber, City of Kemah City of FriEndswood City of League City William E King, City of KEmah Brazoria County Dr NEd Levine, H-GAC Galveston County Aaron McGuire, R West Development SOWEII &CO. R West Development Michelle Milliard,TxDOT Shadow Creek Ranch Alan Mueller, City of PEarland Consultant Team Jack Murphy, City of League City KimlEy-Horn and Associates, Inc DrEW PEltEr, Shadow Creek Ranch In association with Leonard Polk,TxDOT(Galveston) Gunda Corporation, Inc SR Beard, Inc Lynn Spencer, H-GAC Jacobs Civil, Inc. Rakesh Thipathi, TxDOT(Houston) The preparation of this document was financed in part through grants from the U S Department of Transportation under Section 112 of the 1973 Federal Aid Highway Act and Section 8(d) of the Federal Transit act of 1964, as amended The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Texas Department of Transportation, Houston-Galveston Area Council, City of Pearland, City of Friendswood, City of League City, Sowell& Co, R West Development, or Shadow Creek Ranch Acceptance of this report does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of any of the above agencies to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws tialC Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan StakeholdEr MEEtings 4 4.4 Conclusions 19 TablE of Contents Public MEEtings . 4 2 5 AgEncy Participation . . 4 ChaptEr 5 Improvement Options 21 EXECUtIVE Summary I ACCESS ManagemEnt Steering Committee. . 4 5.1 Introduction.. 21 Introduction I 2 6 Public MEEting Summaries... 5 CurrEnt Corridor Conditions I Summary of First Public MEEting 5 5 2 Safety 21 Summary of SEcond Public Meeting 5 RaisEd MEdian Installation 21 Public Involvement I DrivEway Consolidation . ... 21 Study Goals I ChaptEr 3 Corridor Goals and ObjEctivEs . . .. 7 53 Opertational 22 3 I Corridor Goals and ObjEctivEs 7 Right-Turn Lane 22 Recommendations II LEft-Turn LanE.. .. .. ......22 Short-TErm REcommEndations II FM 518 Corridor Goals 7 Signal Timing 22 Medium-TErm REcommEndations III Goal I. ImprovE Safety 7 Long-Term REcommEndations III Goal 2 IdEntify Short-TErm Transportation Solutions 7 5 4 Policy 22 Goal 3. ImprovE Traffic Flow 7 Authority and PurposE 22 REsults IV Goal 4 REduCE Motorist Delay 8 Coordination with TxDOT 22 Safety IV Goal 5• Assess Long-TErm Corridor NEEds 8 SharEd and Cross ACCESS Provisions 22 CongEstion IV ThoroughfarE Planning 23 Air Quality IV ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions 9 Design GuidElines 23 Conclusion IV 5 5 Other ImprovEmEnts 23 4 I Existing Traffic CharactEristics 9 Transit Service 23 Daily Traffic VolumEs 9 Pedestrian Amenities 23 ChaptEr I Introduction I Corridor Origin — DEstination Patterns 9 Bicycle LanEs 23 Corridor Travel Speeds 9 1.1 Study Team I Crash Data 9 ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor 12 Study Process 1 4 2 Roadway and Access Inventory 12 ImprovEmEnts 25 Functional Classification 12 Chapter 2 Public InvolvEmEnt ProcEss 3 Traffic Signals 12 6.1 Introduction 25 Right-of-Way 13 2 I Introduction 3 Railroad Crossings 13 6.2 Methodology 25 Transit Operations 13 Operational ImprovEmEnts 25 2 2 Purpose of Public Involvement Program 3 ACCESS 14 Safety Improvements ...25 Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure 16 2 3 Information and Education 3 MEdian and Edge Treatment 16 6 3 OpErational ImprovemEnts... 25 Presentation Materials . .. 3 Land USE and Zoning 16 Traffic Signal Improvements 25 WEbsitE www FMSl8Mobility corn 3 Summary of CharactEristics 16 Specific Signal and Intersection ImprovemEnts.. . 27 2 4 Outreach 3 REcommendEd Intersection Improvements Explained 28 4.3 Current Corridor Conditions 18 Direct Mail 3 Link Level of Service 18 6 4 SafEty Improvements 39 Public Notices. 4 IntErsEction LEVEl of Service/Delay 18 Median ImprovEmEnts 39 MEdia Coverage 4 Current Corridor Standards 19 Driveway Improvements 41 Table of Contents Draft Access Corridor Plan ❑_C 1 Kimey-Hom �C 1 and Assoc aids,Inc 1 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Ktmley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Other Safety Improvements . 41 8 2 Study Recommendations 57 6.5 Improvement Performance 43 Short-Term Recommendations . 57 Goals and Objectives 43 Medium-Term Recommendations 59 Improve Safety 43 8 3 Action Plan 60 Identify Short-Term Transportation Improvements 44 Improve Traffic Flow and Reduce Delay 44 System Delay 45 AppEndix A Corridor Maps A-I 6.6 Transit Improvements .. .... . . ... 46 Bus Service 46 AppEndix B Short-TErm ImprovEmEnt DEsigns B-I TDM Support Strategies 46 Park & Ride and Park & Pool Lots 47 AppEndix C Signal SystEm Maps C-I Site Design and Facility Improvements 47 Parking Management 47 Funding Opportunities 48 AppEndix D MEdium-TErm BICyCIE / PEdEstrian 6 7 Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements 49 ImprovEmEnts D-I Improvements 49 Funding Opportunities 49 AppEndix E Long-TErm ThoroughfarE Plans E-I ChaptEr 7 FuturE Corridor NEEds / ImprovEmEnts 51 7 I Introduction SI 7 2 Policy Recommendations 51 Authority 51 Comprehensive Plan SI Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance .52 7.3 Future Thoroughfare Planning 52 Extension and Widening Recommendations 53 7 4 Pedestrian and Bicycle Needs 54 Bicycle Improvements 54 Pedestrian Improvements.... 54 7 5 Future Transit Opportunities . 55 Bus SErvICE 55 Teleworking 55 ChaptEr 8 Study REcommEndations and Action Plan. 57 8 I Overview 57 Table of Contents Draft Access Corridor Plan n Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEment Plan List of Exhibits Exhibit 6 3-10 HarkEy/Oday REcommEndation 30 Exhibit 6 4-I. Medians ProtEct the Functional IntErsEction ArEa 39 Exhibit I H-GAC Crash Rates I Exhibit 6 3-I1- Halbert/McLEan/Walnut REcommendation. 30 Exhibit 6.4-2 Proposed Median Plan.. .............. .... .... . .. 39 Exhibit 2• Comparison of Crash RatEs I Exhibit 6 3-12. SH 35 REcommEndation 31 Exhibit 6 4-3• Proposed FM 518 Median 39 Exhibit I 0-I Metropolitan Planning ArEa I Exhibit 6.3-13 Old Alvin REcommendation . . . 31 Exhibit 6 4-3. OvErhEad mountEd street name sign 41 Exhibit 1.2-I. Study ProcEss I Exhibit 6 3-14. PEarland Parkway REcommendation 32 Exhibit 6 5-I Conflict points and crashEs 44 Exhibit 2 6-I Safety ImprovEmEnt QuestionnairE 5 Exhibit 6 3-I5 Liberty/Country Club REcommEndation 32 Exhibit 7 I-I• Access Management in Municipal Policy SI Exhibit 4 2-1• Land USE in the FM 518 Corridor 16 Exhibit 6.3-16. Dixie Farm RecommEndation 32 Exhibit 7 2-I. PlacEment of CommErcial Activity CentErs (CUTR) 52 Exhibit 5 2-I Conflict Points 21 Exhibit 6 3-17 FM 235I EdgEwood REcommendation 33 Exhibit 7 41 RaisEd median with pEdestrian crossing 54 Exhibit 5.2-2. Median TrEatments 21 Exhibit 6 3-17A• WhispEring Pines REcommEndation 33 Exhibit 5.2-3. CompositE Crash RatE Indices 21 Exhibit 6 3-18 FM 528/Parkwood REcommEndations 33 List of Ta b IEs Exhibit 5 2-4 Driveway Consolidation 21 Exhibit 6.3-19 Bay Area Boulevard 34 Table I FM 518 Minimum ConnEction Spacing III Exhibit 5 3-1• Right-Turn LanE 22 Exhibit 6 3-20 Spring Landing/Palamino REcommEndation 34 Table 4.1-I. Corridor AADT's 9 Exhibit 5 3-2 LEft-Turn LanE 22 Exhibit 6 3-21• Landing Boulevard RecommEndation 34 Table 4.1-2 Crash Data by Severity by City 9 Exhibit 5 4-I Cross Access 22 Exhibit 6 3-22• Hobbs/LafayEtte REcommendation 34 TablE 41-3 Crash Summary . 10 Exhibit 5 4-2 ThoroughfarE Planning ConnEction Spacing 23 Exhibit 6 3-23 IH-45 South Bound 35 Table 4 1-4 Crash Rate Comparison 10 Exhibit 6 2-1 Functional IntErsEction ArEa 25 Exhibit 6 3-24 IH-45 North Bound 35 Table 41-5 Top Crash Rates in the Houston-Galveston ArEa 10 Exhibit 6 3-I Typical Split Phased Signal SEquencE 26 Exhibit 6 3-25 Existing Southbound Approach on TablE 41-6• Cost of Crashes 10 IH-45 at FM 518 36 Exhibit 6.3-2. Typical Minor StrEEt Lane Configuration ...26 TablE 4 I-7• Crash Statistics by ZonE II Exhibit 6 3-26• South Side of FM 518 Looking WEst Exhibit 6.3-3. 130-sEcond cycle PM timing scenario 28 through IH-45 (showing building closE to ROW) 36 TablE 4 2-I Existing Signal PhasE SEquencEs 12-13 Exhibit 6 3-4 SH 288 East Intersection Recommendation 28 Exhibit 6 3-27• North SidE of FM 518 at IH-45 (showing the Table 4.2-2. FM 518 Corridor Access by City and Driveway TypE 14 Existing TxDOT communications cabinEt) 36 Exhibit 6 3-5• Silverlake Village Recommendation 29 Table 4 2-3 Roadway Access by Zone IS Exhibit 6 3-28• Interurban RecommEndations 37 Exhibit 6 3-6 Wal-Mart Driveway REcommendation 29 Table 4 2-4. Summary of Corridor Characteristics 17 Exhibit 6 3-29• SH 3 REcommendations . .37 Exhibit 6 3-7 CR 94/HomE Depot 29 Table 4 3-I Corridor LOS and LOM Results... . . ..I8 Exhibit 6.3-30. Texas Recommendations 37 Exhibit 6.3-8. FM 865/Cullen Boulevard Recommendation 29 Table 4.3-2. Corridor Intersection LOS . 18-19 Exhibit 6 3-31 FM 270/FM 2094 Recommendations 38 Exhibit 6 3-9 FM I128/ Manvel RecommEndations 30 Table 4 3-3 Current Access Practices 20 TablE 6 3-2• Comparison of MOEs 38 Table of ContEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan CUP Kimley-Horn �,_ ] and Associates,Inc. tii G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report ('opyrighr®100a Ktmlet-Horn and Associates,Inc tilD10 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Table 6 3-I Intersection Improvements . . 27-28 Table 6.3-2. Comparison of MOEs 38 Table 6 4-I. Short-Term Raised Median Improvements 40 Table 6 4-2 Medium-Term Raised Median Improvements 40 Table 6 5-I• Safety Improvements 43 Table 6 5-2• Intersection Improvements 44-45 Table 6 7-I Short-Term Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements 49 Table 6.7-2. Medium-Term Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements. 49 Table 7.2-2. FM 5I8 Minimum Connection Spacing 52 Table 7 3-I HGAC's 2022 MTP Corridor Improvements 53 Table 7 3-2• Pearland, Friendswood, and League City's Planned Thoroughfares 53 Table 7 3-3 Thoroughfare Recommendations 53 Table 7 4-I Possible Bicycle Facility Types 54 Table 8 2-I Cost Summary of All Short-and Medium-Term Recommendations 57 Table 8.2-2. Short-Term Raised Median Recommendations 57 Table 8 2-3. Short-Term Intersection Recommendations . . 58 Table 8 2-4. Short-Term Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements 58 Table 8 2-4 Medium-Term Raised Median Recommendations 59 Table 8 2-5• Medium-Term Intersection Recommendations 59 Table 8 2-6• Medium-Term Pedestrian and Bicycle Recommendations 59 Table of Contents Draft Access Corridor Plan iv Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) -1-101F)0FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan �mm� Kimley Horn and Associates,Inc by the U S. Congress to document and estimate the cost of motor CONCLUSION ExEeutivE Summary AUGUST 2004 vehicle crashes Based on these figures,an estimated total of $37,760,000 worth of economic loss was experienced in these La Pore The success of the FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan is Houston acre, communities over three years(1998, 1999,and 2000) dependent on the formation or strengthening of partnerships among This study was commissioned by Pasadena This information is valuable in the vanety of involved entities This section seeks to clearly the Houston-Galveston Area determming mitigation strategies for CongestionCouncil(H-GAC), a voluntaryT"MrLaake�s'�` intersection improvements,median 9 identify the roles and responsibilities of each agency in meeting the ( ) p , The intersection and operational improvements recommended in association of local governments,p P goals of this study g m separations, and driveway „„a,,,,,,a Naasan 8., Clear lake Stares this plan will greatly reduce traffic delay The graphic below shows Steps Agency and local elected officials in theWebsme „„ consolidations that by making intersection and signal timing improvements the p g y 13-county Gulf Coast State 1 Policy board approval of study H-GAC Fr; Congestion Level-of-service(LOS) overall corndor delay can be reduced significantly. Over 100 hours Planning Region H-GAC and the ' 2 Secure funding for short-term Project limits from US 288 to SH 146 ,,,o�,�h was determined for FM 518 using in the AM penod will be reduced, and over 30 hours in the PM Texas Department of intersection improvements H-GAC and .am. P, SynchroTM software,which simulates The resulting cost saved by these improvements in the AM and PM TxDOT Transportation(TxDOT)recognize periods alone equate to approximately$430,000 per year developing a viable transportation 1"-''''' °"�^'° actual traffic conditions by inputting 3 Implement intersection improvements TxDOT \ roadway geometries, daily traffic system not only includes building �` x ra=a. 4 Implement system-wide signal retuning TxDOT and Cities ems`}' volumes, and signal tuning and cycle AM CORRIDOR TRAVEL TIME DELAY 5 Secure fundingfor median improvements H-GAC and new roadways and adding transit, P x length.The simulation indicated ��Fe but managing the access and TxDOT demand for travel on these FMf16Co1WU(MlACC69PUN - significant congestion levels during 6 Implement median improvements TxDOT systems Q,� .�rf. ; — o e, .- i 4 both the PM and AM peak travel times 7 Coordinate with TxDOT for median Study Area Map These conditions were verified aesthetics Cities The FM 518 roadway from during field observations 8 Identify funding and implement bike US 288 to SH 146 was identified Generally, each person traveling along FM 518 is experiencing pedestrian improvements H-GAC,TxDOT, as a corridor that is experiencing rapid growth, safety concerns, and Cities and traffic congestion This major east-west roadway is 25 5 miles 15 minutes of delay in the AM peak and 10 minutes in the PM 9 Adopt FM 518 Corridor Access Plan long The majority of these miles consist of a five-lane cross- peak Essentially, commuters using the FM 518 comdor waste i an average of one week stuck in traffic over a one year period . ire :50 lea or0 400 yo f00 by ordinance Cities section with four mainlanes and one two-way left-turn lane Hass or Delay 10 Program long-range thoroughfare This lost time contributes to lost productivity at work, depleted *seam Condemn•Slu^yRese nendalonel The purpose of this corridor study is to identify transportation family times, and road rage improvements Cities measures that will improve public safety and traffic flow,reduce 11 Update comprehensive plans and subdivision standards Cities motorist delay,enhance air quality,and improve pedestrian and PM CORRIDOR DELAY COMPARISON bicycle access The FM 518 corridor defines the term PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT iiiiioil01. "intergovernmental coordination,"bisecting four cities,two This corndor plan attempted to gain the input and concurrence of local business leaders, stakeholders,city officials,regional leaders, counties,being a TxDOT facility,and under the H-GAC umbrellaT'he public meeting component of the outreach effort comprised The cities involved in this study are Pearland,Friendswood, two series of meetin s each made u of three meetin sand the general public It is clear from the technical analysis and g , p g (one mIII 7- League City, and Kemah Also,Brazona and Galveston Countieseach ci of Pearland Friendswoodpublic process that implementing the short-term intersection and multi le land develo ers have la ed a maor role ui rovidin ty ,and League City/Kemah) improvements and system-wide signal retiming will provide the p p p y p g These meetings intended to relay the purpose,process, and greatest relief in terms of operations Additionally, installing raised guidance to the study teamprogress of the study, and were held in the evenings at venues medians at high crash locations in the short-term will provide within each city This maximized public convenience and safety benefits to the traveling public The medium and long-range CURRENT CORRIDOR CONDITIONS allowed discussions to focus in on sub-areas as well as whole- II n 50 m 125 improvements that are contained herein can be implemented corridor issues Hoe:oroek.y i.....C.an4Mbn•SWMReeemmend Dens as funding and need arises To develop the remainder of the Safety FM 518 has one of the most hazardous crash rates when corridor it is critical that the long-term policy recommendations compared to other roads in the region and the state as a whole In addition to the various public meetmgs, local community and - ` are incorporated into each city's suite of The graphics business groups were encouraged to invite project team members Air Quality Contact Information development regulations This will allow for the below illustrate Roadwa Crash Rate(per100n►icnWMi7 to make presentations about the study to their respective groups •Once implemented,the recommendations corridor to develop in a more sustained manor this point By John F Kennedy rem 1998 2000 505 Jerry Bobo outlined m this plan will contribute to the region Houston-Galveston Area Council Incremental improvements willprovide relief, geographically p Kirby Drive 415 meeting clean air goals and improving quality of 3555 Timmons Lane,Suite 120 but long lasting sustainable corridor success will analyzing the STUDY GOALS life Overall,air quality pollutant levels can be Houston,Texas 77027 only be achieved if some level of discipline is crash date,the Texas Medical Center 314 Off reduced by more than 30%,which equates to Phone (713)627-3200 exercised to controldevelopments access to study team FM 1960 AN 260 Fax (713)993-4508 �' documented FM 518 ,�. 203 Through an extensive public involvement program and the more than 19,500 gallons of fuel saved E-mail ferry bobo@h-gac corn 0 �! 0 300 400 500 recognition of the current and projected deficiencies in the FM 518 crash hot spots corridor,the study team established five corridor goals Air Quality Benefits Kurt Schulte,AICP H-GAC Crash Rates Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc • Improve Safety Pollutant % Reduced 12700 Park Central Drive Suite 1800 Crash Rate(per 100 million vMT) • Identify Short-Term Transportation Solutions NOx = 37% Dallas,Texas 75251 Geographical Area Years 1998-2000 ■ Improve Traffic Flow Phone (972)770-1300 ` VOC = 34% Fax (972)239-3820 Texas ! , 150 • Reduce Motorist Delay E-mail kurt Schulte kimle -horn corn 8-County Houston i 203 ■ CO = 36% @ y FM 518 corridor_ Assess Long-Term Comdor Needs For more information visit Galveston Area 5, lc, 200197 www FM518moblllty corn Page 6 Comparison of Crash Rates Page 1 RECOMMENDATIONS Operational improvements include Medium-Term Recommendations The result of the corridor overlay district will be a roadway and ■ Right-Turn Lane The medium-term land development pattern that is more sustamable,aesthetically The study team utilized traffic modeling software,crash analysis • Left-Turn Lane recommendations were pleasing,and techniques, and field verifications to examine the current situation ■ Signal Timing pnoritized based upon their economically ` ea.,. from the adjacent along FM 518 The FM 518 Corridor Stakeholder Committee ability to improve mobility, its vibrant Getting �l l _ j � g �� approved a menu of access management treatments based upon These types of improvements are detailed in Table 1. reduce hazardous roadway their abilityto the reduce traffic delayand improve traffic flow and conditions,and reduce picture to the �. , „i„t3 .. . ..1- J � - safety for motorists,pedestrians, and bicyclists The study team The study team identified areas where turning traffic,both at the traffic delay These rendering below I then applied these access management techniques to the roadway's street intersection and at commercial driveways located within the improvements attract a depends on --__ ,y most hazardous and congested sections functional area of the greater level of funding, implementmg the • intersection,was the major Characteristics of a potential typically are beyond the long-term I ROW line,and may requireConsolidation of Driveways t recommendations The improvements were then presented to the public for review reason for high crash rates short-term raised median �■�� Based upon these comments,the studyteam made modifications to Byanalyzing the incidents extensive coordination with of this study,which p Y g recommendation include. include Before Access Management the plan,estimated costs,and generated an action plan The of crashes surrounding each property owners The improvements listed in Tables 4 and 5 following study recommendations and action plan is the product of signalized and unsignahzed • Intersection with a high represent the major modifications called for to make FM 518 a ■ Coordination with TxDOT a comprehensive public involvement process, coordinated effort intersection in the corridor, crash rate (>10) safer and more accessible roadway The medium-term ■ Shared-and Cross-Access Provisions amongst all interested parties, and continuation of the partnerships the study team was able to • Adjacent land use has good recommendations call for dnveway consolidations, increased cross ■ Thoroughfare Planning needed for success prioritize the application alternative access ways and shared access between developments,raised medians,new • Design Guidelines of raised medians Below (driveway on cross street) traffic signals,pedestrian/bicycle accommodations(Table 6), Short-Term Recommendations illustrates this intersection • Adjacent land use has and programs to increase transit potential The short-term recommendations concentrate on improvements median concept adequate internal circulation Recommendations I i = 4 1t that do not require major purchases of right-of-way(ROW),have a ■ The addition of the raisedLong-Term short construction penod, and need only minor coordination with The short-term raised median has limited safety The long-term recommendations focus on changes to land use and a� - , '-- ---- - °;� M I/' - property owners Tables 1 and 2 detail the short-term intersection medians will be benefits, but does contribute transportation policy,future thoroughfare plans,transit1 a: �' and median improvements for the corridor Also,recommended implemented in the next aesthetically to a gateway opportunities, and future pedestrian/bicycle accommodations — - one-to-twoyears Table 2 feature These improvements require ample funding, ``a -s- pedestrian and bicycle improvements can be found in Table 3 P q P coordination, and persistence Nevertheless,they are very ��+` - +G3 600 FT MAX important to reaching the community vision of what the corndor —..,:...- will TURN LANE look like in the future After Access Management BRICK BANDING LOW SHR _, One of the most important long-term recommendations is the N N creation of a corridor overlay district The overlay would dictate OP _ &E the spacing of access RESULTS �— connections to FM 518, Posted Speed Distance N ,- '. ... ( ) as illustrated in the (mph) ft N: adjacent table,and set Safety -,s, —1\ _ — Fin I__I N guidelines for land use <30 200 The application of a raised median in the FM 518 corndor has the decisions and 35 250 ! potential to reduce crashes The graphic shown below illustrates 24 WIDE ISLAND NOSE CANOPY TREES transportation 40 305 the relationship between crash rates and conflict points As you WITH BRICK PAVERS i enhancements. 45 360 can see,there is a direct correlation between the corridor crash Proposed Median Plan >50 425 rates and conflict points Also,as shown by the green line,as a median barrier is added the conflict points can be dramatically indicates the extents of the short-term raised median reduced The National Safety Council was recently commissioned Traffic conditions modeling is one of the primary tools that improvements Safety improvements include raised medians transportation planners and engineers use to evaluate current and at hazardous intersections future corridor conditions Using current intersection traffic counts IllftaSdllgIIIIIIIIIIIIMII 225 2000 and SynchroTM software,the study team evaluated every signalized The study team also identified corridor-wide improvements . 175 E intersection. As mentioned in the Current Corridor Conditions, many intersections are operating at an unacceptable LOS Based • Incorporatmg isolated traffic signals mto a closed-loop system I. 1500 on current traffic counts,field observation,and public involvement, and optimizing all signals for current traffic / mom 125 the study team tested various intersection improvement options in • Early warning signage of approaching major intersections woo an attempt to optimize both the intersections and the overall • Continuous street lightmg of similar strength and spacing g ,✓ ` 75corridor mobility This process involved not only modeling Identifying agencies or groups to landscape new medians € 5.a _.' \\'NA � 25 recommended physical improvements such as left-turn and right- and ROW turn lanes,but also mcluded optimizing the mtersection phasing, • Adding back panels to signal heads to reduce glare 0 -25 timmg,and offsets • Addition of block numbers to overhead street signs Peadand Fnendswood League Cdy Kemah I—Total Conflict Points—Proposed Cpdict Points—Crash Data J Page 2 Page 5 11010 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan C h a tE r I other access related techniques aimed at increasing safety and reducing p In November 2002,H-GAC announced a call for projects for candidate traffic congestion travel corridors that would benefit from short-term and long-term Introduction operational and access management improvements Municipal officials 1.1 STUDY TEAM This study was commissioned by the H-GAC,a voluntary association of from Pearland, Friendswood,League City, and Kehma identified the FM 518 corridor from US 288 to SH 146 as an area that was experiencing rapid The project team listed below, along with several local and state agencies local governments and local elected officials in the 13-county Gulf Coast growth, safety concerns,and traffic congestion H-GAC determined the were responsible for the development and implementation of FM 518 State Planning Region—an area of 12,500 square miles with more than 4 8 million people(see MoLgo„e,, entire corridor warranted study. Corridor Access Management Plan. Exhibit 1.0-1) H-GAC ca n" Liberty County The purpose of this corridor study is to identify transportation measures that • Houston-Galveston Area Council(H-GAC) works to promote efficient �`` Texas Department of Transportation TxDOT and accountable use of local, will improve public safety and traffic flow,reduce motorist delay, enhance P P (TxDOT) , g 0 if air quality, and improve bicycle and pedestrian access The FM 518 • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc state,and federal tax dollars, Wallet Cry -� corridor defines the term "intergovernmental coordination,"bisecting four • Gunda Corporation, Inc serves as a problem-solving Chambers- - • SR Beard,Inc and information forum for (� cities,two counties,being a TxDOT facility, and under the H-GAC „ra -- -- t� N umbrella The Cities involved in this study are Pearland,Friendswood, ■ Jacobs Civil, Inc local governments,and helps Harris County Q �5 League City, and Kemah Also,Brazos and Galveston Counties have local governments, ' S9 played a major role in providing guidance to the study team. 1.2 STUDY PROCESS businesses, and civic organizations analyze trends fort Bend County j FM 518 provides east-west mobility and access to many retail,commercial, The study process and conditions affecting the and residential developments In addition,this corridor intersects with four followed the rational area in order to respond to major north-south facilities such as US 288, SH 35,IH-45,and SH 146 planning approach in FM 518 Study Process their needs These north-south routes provide commuters with direct routes to Houston, which the study team Exhibit 10-1 Metropolitan Planning Area Galveston, and major attractions such as the Texas Medical Center and the conducted an extensive summer 2003 Project Kickoff The rate of growth in the t3 Houston Space Center. As described in greater detail in Chapter 2,this data collection effort, base Houston region is predicted to be approximately 41%between the years corridor has a very high crash history and experiences peak hour delays atmap development, late summer 2003 Public!Agency Involvement Plan 2003 and 2025 This holds many opportunities for economic growth and data manyof its analysis,and development diversification of the local economy. Such fantastic growth also presents x--1-�°- a ,- ,t-,tea major t 4 ' of a final report At late summer 2003 Assembly 8 Review of Data many challenges to the natural and built environment The regional I 1 -- appropriate sta es during °°� °� transportation network is one such challenge If it cannot provide an intersections --� g a $4h,.. : :� _ ,� , the process,public acceptable level of service in the main travel corridors,the economy, ' / fa„2003 This study --�'~�1 m� `";� -. meetings and stakeholder Public!Meamtg1 community,and environment as a whole will suffer This regional dilemma ; � Sty',^' is being addressed by H-GAC's Transportation Department will r_ T—mo meetings were conducted to helpthe team refine fall Evaluation of ExistingCorridor ultimately . - �_{ provide the �' options and give overall Given such challenges,H-GAC recognizes developing a viable transportation �, 5 ------ appropriate -- jam; l<,� j r ��" guidance The project system not only includes building new roadways and adding transit,but alsor. f ' ,� 'r-\f• I steeringcommittee, late winter 2003 Analysis of Short-Term Solutions agencies with j x. managing the access and demand for travel on these systems "access 10.:a ,apord,,,,�„m management"is a set of strategies designed to make best use of existing a list of T I defined in Chapter 3, d.d...�...�. ' played a crucial role in short-term ,✓ - p y winter 2003 L0 transportation facilities as well as enhancing transportation improvements \ rig•TermAccessManagementStrategies Using strategies such as installing raised medians and providing adequately operational providing the team with � � spaced driveways, access management will significantly improve the level and access insightful guidance and spring 2004 Public l Meeting 2 management review oversight The s of safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of the transportation system improvements. Study Area Map graphic(Exhibit 1.2-1) Access management approaches can include depicts the general early summer 2004 In addition, Final Report • Strategies to integrate transportation and land-use planning bicycle and pedestrian improvements will be identified and transit process that was followed • Model ordinances designed to standardize driveway spacing, opportunities and funding will be explored Recommendations for long Exhibit 1 2-1 Study Process deceleration lanes,corner clearance, sight distance, and raised range improvements will be compiled into what could become an access median installations management overly district for the corridor These improvements will include driveway spacing guidelines, shared access provisions, and several Chapter 1 Introduction Draft Access Corridor Plan i ❑_II IGmley-Hom and Associates,Inc 1 G\TPTO\635917000WM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc I-104C Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan ChaptEr I Introduction Draft AccEss Corridor Plan 2 trjeHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Ch a ptE r 2 The program was enhanced by close adherence to the following guiding Website www FM518Mobility.com principles throughout the study As part of the effort to educate and inform the public about the study,the Pu b I i c I n vo I V E m E n t P r o c E S S • Initiation of citizen participation at the onset of the study and continued project team strived to keep an up-to-date and informative project website throughout the process The site contained copies of the various presentation materials and study • Intensified efforts to solicit community views prior to major project- progress,and was advertised at public meetings 2.1 INTRODUCTION decision points • Public access to all relevant information • Regular reports of study findings to the public in layperson terms 2.4 OUTREACH An important element of the FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan has • Provision of orientation materials to accommodate new participants been the proactive public involvement program,which provided opportunities entering the process for the public and various interest groups to participate in the study process An outreach program to increase awareness of and interest in transportation • Two-way communication between the study team and community and the transportation planningprocess, as well as encourage and ultimately provided guidance in forming the proposed improvements plansp g participants to freely exchange information, ideas, and values Since the local responsibility for compliance with federal regulations forparticipation in these efforts,was crucial to the project's success. The • Presentation of transportation options in an objective manner FM 518 Corridor has manystakeholders, includingresidents, public involvement ties with the H-GAC,the program was designed to • Use of a variety of techniques and approaches to reach a diverse group businesses, comply with the goals of the H-GAC transportation public involvement employees,commuters,environmental and historic preservation groups, of persons potentially affected by the proposed project civic and homeowner organizations,communityplanninggroups city program,which has a strong emphasis on public education,outreach, and g g p • Serious consideration of all suggestions from the community councils,resource agencies,major land owners,and others who are affected participation. The program provided opportunities for the public and various • Timely response with answers and information to citizen inquiries interest groups to participate in the planning process FM 518 Corridor by transportation issues in the corridor. • Complete documentation of public involvement activities Access Management Plan public involvement activities addressed the need to • Incorporation of small discussion groups to encourage a casual In addition,the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century(TEA-21) have an ongoing information exchange from the very beginning to the end of environment for discussions during public meetings the study Arriving at consensus on the short-and long-range alternatives guidelines on public involvement require that the following groups be during the study process will enable the next phase,programming • Evaluation of the public involvement program s effectiveness provided a reasonable opportunity to participate in the planning process improvements and detail design,to focus on design details rather than bigger- • People traditionally underserved by transportation services picture issues • Special interest groups 2.3 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION • Governmental officials and agencies This chapter describes the vanous public involvement activities and • Affected land owners techniques that were used duringthe development of the FM 518 Corridor As part of the public involvement program and to support a cooperative q p • Public transit operators Access Management Plan planning process,the project team developed an informational and • Community development agencies educational campaign The campaign described benefits of alternatives and • Representatives of transportation agency employees activities in a concise, straightforward manner The team also developed • Private providers of transportation 2.2 PURPOSE OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM materials to educate the public on the study process and transportation planning issues In disseminating information to the public,the team used a The following approaches were used to contact and involve project variety of methods, including the following,which will be discussed in The purpose of the public improvement program for the FM 518 Corridor more detail below stakeholders in the study process. Access Management Plan was to promote open, proactive communication • Direct Mail with the public and stakeholders in the corridor in order to develop a ■ Presentation materials • Public Notices meaningful dialogue. As such,the suggested alternatives and other • Website(www FM5 1 8Mobility corn) • Media Coverage decisions made as a part of the study may be more widely accepted, although there may not be unanimous agreement The public involvement • Public Meetings program provided access to information about the project,an opportunity Presentation Materials • Web Site for the public to give input on needs and solutions, and a mechanism by At each round of public meetings, a series of presentation boards was used which decision-makers can value and seriously consider the public input to provide information about the study and describe the project The boards Direct Mail received It also served as a means to reflect that the input received was included the study process,a project schedule,an overview of the corridor, To conduct a public involvement process touching as many affected parties considered in the development of the study recommendations the goals of the study, and the technical results at each stage of the study as possible,the project team, in cooperation with H-GAC,the Cities of Pearland,Friendswood, and League City identified and assembled a comprehensive list of area residents,property owners and businesses,public officials,civic organizations,resource agencies,community groups, and Chapter 2 Public Involvement PrOCESS Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑� Knnley-Fbm —Il wdA a s,Inc 3 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Ktmley-Horn and Associates,Inc 1-1DIU Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan media representatives who will likely have interest in this project Before All comments received from the public meetings and in response to the each public meeting,direct mail notices were delivered within 30 days of At the meetings,poster-sized graphic displays providing information about questionnaires were documented and analyzed as input into the study as it each meeting.This provided adequate time to either attend the meeting or the study were available for review Displays were staffed by team progressed provide written comments to the appropriate party. members who were knowledgeable about the project so that attendees could have questions answered and provide direct input regarding the project Documentation All input from the public was carefully documented After each series of Public Notices The public-meeting component of the outreach effort comprised of two public meetings,the project team prepared detailed summaries in order to Timely access to public outreach activities is also achieved via public notices series of meetings,each made up of three meetings(one in each City, provide a permanent record of the material covered and the public and announcements To ensure notification of both english-and spanish- Pearland,Friendswood,and League City) These meetings intended to comments received Copies of these summaries,which include the speaking stakeholders,public notices were placed in local,community,and relay the purpose,process,and progress of the study, and were held in the following,are available from the project team or H-GAC bilingual newspapers, including the Houston Chronicle,La Voz de Houston, evenings at venues within each City This maximized public convenience Houston Defender, and The 1960 Sun Public notices were published twice and allowed discussions to focus in on sub-areas as well as whole-comdor • FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Public Meeting 1 —at 30 days and 10 days prior—for each round of meetings issues ■ FM518 Corridor Access Management Plan Public Meeting 2 Notices of public meetings were also provided prior to meetings were The planned meeting dates and locations are as follows Follow Up Procedures posted on the project website The purpose of timely follow-through by TxDOT was to demonstrate to the public that decision makers seriously consider the public input received. Series Location Date Citizen inquiries were followed up promptly with answers and information Media Coverage One: League City,Johnnie Arolfo October 27, 2003 One to three weeks prior to all public meetings,press releases were issued Civic Center throughout the corridor to english-and spanish-language newspapers,radio 2.5 AGENCY PARTICIPATION stations,and television stations The purpose of the press release was to Friendswood,City Hall November 11,2002 provide a wide range of coverage concerning upcoming public meetings and key decisions of the study A number of key media contacts were also Pearland,Pearland Junior November 12,2002 Access Management Steering Committee included on the general mailing list and received notice of all meetings High School South H-GAC established the FM 518 Corridor Access Plan Steering Committee Two: Pearland,City Hall May 19,2004 to offer technical and policy decisions and guide the technical development Stakeholder Meetings Friendswood,City Hall May 18,2004 of the study The committee met at key milestones in the process to receive The project team was available during the project to meet with stakeholders, League City,City Hall May 17,2004 and assess reports on progress, comment on the schedule,coordinate with their respective agencies,and provide oversight of major activities general public, or elected officials in order to provide educational associated with the study The Steering Committee was comprised of information as well as update interested parties on the study progress, representatives from TxDOT,H-GAC,Cities of Pearland, Friendswood, alternatives under consideration,and key decision points In addition to the various public meetings, local community and business groups were encouraged to invite project team members to make and League City, Brazoria County, Galveston County and a host of private The main function of the meetings was to serve as a method to consider presentations about the study to their respective groups contributors The title page contains a list of Steering Committee members individual issues and possibly incorporate those issues into the study Steering Committee meetings were held on the following dates. recommendations These meetings were generally held a few weeks prior Pubhc Input to each public meeting Members of the public were afforded the following opportunities for • September 10,2003 providing input into the study. • December 11,2003 Public Meetings • Questionnaires with specific questions and open-ended response Public meetings are the best opportunity for most people to learn about a opportunities. project and directly interface with the project team The meetings,which • Comment forms for general notes, comments,and ideas were open to all interested parties,were conducted primarily in an open- • Flip charts for making general notes,comments and ideas—these were house format so that people could arrive at their convenience and review set up at various strategic positions at each public meeting information at their own pace. There were also occasions where brief • Verbal communication with members of the project team. presentations were made, and questions and comments from the meeting • Letters, e-mails,and phone calls to H-GAC and the project team attendees were encouraged ChaptEr 2 Public Involvement ProcEss Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 4 VCHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan C h a ptE r 3 Measure 2: Conflict Point Reduction The second measure of effectiveness for Safety Improvements comes from reducing the amount of conflict Corridor Goals and O b j E ct i vE s points at driveways and unsignalized intersections Intersections without access management considerations typically have 18 potential conflict points So, a corridor section with 50 driveways per mile and no access management treatments has 900 potential conflict points. The formula for calculating the conflict points per 3.1 CORRIDOR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES mile is as follows FM 518 Corridor Goals Through an extensive public outreach program and the recognition of the current and projected deficiencies in the I Driveways Per Mile x Conflict Points = Total Conflict Points Per Mile corridor,the study team established five corridor goals,which are later discussed in detail,as follows JI • Improve Safety Strategies to meet this goal include • Identify Short-Term Transportation Solutions • Relocating • Improve Traffic Flow • Consolidating or eliminating driveways • Reduce Motorist Delay • Promoting shared driveways • Assess Long-Term Corridor Needs • Increasing corner clearance ■ Improving driveway geometries The application of this study's access management recommendations and actions will move the involved communities • Installing raised medians toward the goals listed above The following section details how these goals will be achieved and measured This process is one in which face to face meetings were conducted to negotiate the best possible scenario for all Goal 1: Improve Safety effected stakeholders Chapter 6, Safety Improvements, summarizes the measures of effectiveness for the proposed safety improvements Access management saves lives and also reduces the frequency of injury and property damage crashes The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)indicates that 50%to 70%of all accidents are access related and could be relieved with proper access management strategies Chapter 4 discusses in detail the Goal 2 Identify Short-Term Transportation Solutions exisisting traffic condition on FM 518 that are leading to a high vehicle crash risk This goal will be achieved by providing a list of projects that establishes project cost,project limits, and benefits of Measure 1: Driveway Density Ratio each project The toolbox displayed in Chapter 6,contains a list of improvements. The list will also be used to In order to accurately quantify safety improvements the team is measunng the effectiveness of reducing identify funding sources and implementing agencies. driveways per mile The team is using 30-driveways per mile as the goal driveway density within the corridor This density will be measured against the actual driveway density to establish a driveway density ratio Goal 3• Improve Traffic Flow Therefore,the calculation for improving safety is• This measure will establish the improved traffic flow and the subsequent level of service(LOS)benefits from each of Actual Driveway Density (X) the improvements established in the above goal Measure 1• Level of Service Goal Driveway Density (30) This measure will be evaluated by using our operations model to estimate the LOS before and after improvements The LOS will be evaluated at each intersection and on the corridor segments between the intersections Strategies to meet this goal include • Relocating Measure 2: Median Capacity Adjustments • Consolidating or eliminating The increased capacity resulting from conversion of a two way left turn lane to raised medians will be • Promoting shared driveways incorporated into our operations model A percentage of increased capacity will be added to simulate the reduction inside friction and the benefits of each improvement will be measured against the no build alternative. Chapter 3 Corridor Goals and Objectives Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Can rnd cia IGrnley-Horn tes,Inc G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc tilD2C Houston-Galveston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss Management Plan Goal 4: Reduce Motorist Delay Reducing the overall corridor delay and the individual intersection delay is a major issue throughout the corridor The measures described below will allow for the subsequent improvements to be evaluated and the benefits of each improvement documented Measure 1• Time Delay Benefits Similar to the LOS analysis described above,this measure of effectiveness will evaluate the travel time benefits from the improvements This calculation will be completed using our traffic operations model Measure 2• Median and Driveway Speed Adjustment Additional travel time benefits will be derived from the increased speed realized from introducing raised medians and also from the reduction in driveway density. This speed will be added to the overall corridor speed and the subsequent benefits will be documented Chapter 6 summarizes the measures of effectiveness of improvements aimed at improving traffic flow and reducing motorist delay Goal 5: Assess Long-Term Corridor Needs A major goal of the corridor is to establish long-term corridor needs These could include • Developing a corridor overlay describing design standards • Making thoroughfare plan recommendations • Recommending changes to local municipal codes • Pedestrian and bicycle needs • Investigatmg the viability and funding opportunities for transit service ChaptEr 3 Corridor Goals and Ob'EctivEs Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 8 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan tIPAC Summary of Second Public Meeting 2.6 PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARIES Over 150 people were encouraged to review the information, speak with the consultants and H-GAC staff, and discuss the access management recommendation At each meeting,the project team provided charts and graphic displays of Summary of First Public Meeting where and how the access management treatments would be used to improve mobility and safety The improvements included modifications to nearly half of the signalized intersections in the corridor,a comprehensive signal timing Over 122 people were encouraged to review the information, speak with the consultants and H-GAC staff, and recommendation, consolidation of driveways, addition of raised medians,pedestrian/bicycle improvements, and provide their views on the study. At each meeting,the project team asked the public to identify areas with safety and operational issues by placing dots on the specific locations Many intersections within the corridor were identified for ideas for building transit ridership In addition,the public was encouraged to fill out a one page questionnaire needed improvement In addition,the public was encouraged to fill out a one page questionnaire The following is a summary of the public comments received during the second round of public meetings in League The following is a summary of the public comments received during the first round of public meetings These were City,Friendswood,and Pearland, Texas These were derived from conversations and replies to questionnaires derived from conversations and replies to questionnaires The following is a summary of responses to a public questionnaire distributed at public meetings in League City, Friendswood, and Pearland, Texas 1 At the second meeting when asked,"do you Raised Median Recommendation ° agree with the recommendation to add a raised 1 When asked, "Which locations in the corridor present safety problems,"37%of respondents thought adding a median,"over 60%of citizens agreed raised median would improve safety on the roadway(see Exhibit 2.6-1) 2. Respondents (37%)found signal Prefered Improvements for Safety Purposes timing to be the greatest 2 Almost 95%of respondents agreed that signal ° improvement needed to reduce111111111111 timing and additional turn lanes would improve 36/° traffic problems ❑4 Improving circulation within 01 ', ■Agree developments safety and congestion g 3 Respondents indicated bike 10 64% o Disagree lanes and sidewalks are the most valuable improvements w illii4amil. •3 Adding a signal light 3 Citizens at the second public meeting agreed that needed in the corridor to °, 11 the study teams recommendations would improve the environment for pedestrians and provide alternative modes of E transportation a 1 bicyclists 1— ❑2 Removing driveways 4 This question asked if there 21 4 Respondents were asked to were any general comments on indicate their level of Public Outreach the information at the public satisfaction with the public meeting There was a wide ❑ 1 Adding a raised median outreach effort for this range of general comments — study 40 from re-time traffic lights to 0 10 20 35 provide turn lanes at Respondents 90 -25 intersections. Also, several Exhibit 2 6-1 Safety Improvement Questionnaire Q 20 people were happy with the 15 materials presented and the 10 opportunity for input There were also comments relative to the addition or need for sidewalks and bike lanes 5 0 __ Extremely Very Satisfied Satisfied Un-Satisfied Extremely Satisfied Un-Satisfied Level of Satisfaction Chapter 2 Public Involvement Process Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑ n IGmley Hom and Aesodates,Inc. G\TPTO\635917000WM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Chapter 2 Public InvolvEmEnt ProcEss Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 6 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan C h a ptE r 4 Development strategies are used to charactenze the spatial distribution and use of land These patterns largely Existing Coditi determine trip making patterns,volumes,and modal distributions The potential size of urban areas increased,while n Conditions densities declined As jobs and housing areas became further and further apart, average commute distances,and travel times became longer and longer The following sections define existing traffic characteristics, roadway and access inventory, and current corridor conditions along FM 518 Corridor Travel Speeds Current corridor speeds were recorded throughout the entire corridor Generally,the speeds were found to be between 30 to 45 miles per hour Depending on where one is in the corridor,the speeds have dramatic shifts Table 4.2-4 4.1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS depicts speeds throughout the corndor These speeds will be used in conjunction with the traffic operations model as a baseline to compare before and after travel time savings Daily Traffic Volumes Average annual daily traffic(AADT)volumes were provided by TxDOT from the 2002 Houston District Highway Crash Data Traffic map The 24-hour counts were recorded at multiple locations along the FM 518 corridor The traffic volumes Crash data from the years 1998, 1999,and 2000 provided this study with a significant basis for analysis The crash used to analyze each section of the corridor are shown below in Table 4.1-1 data was analyzed to determine the location, severity, and vehicle impacts During the years 1998, 1999,and 2000 a total of 1,221 crashes occurred along FM 518 including five fatalities and 69 incapacitating incidents Table 4.1-2 Corridor Section AADT shows the crash data separated by seventy for each City SH 288 West Side to FM 865 (Cullen) 24,000 CR 89 to FM 1 128 26,000_ Cities Pearland Friendswood League e Kemah Total Total Harkey/Oday to Woody/ Corrigan 28,000 Halbert/McLean to SH 35 / Main 22,000 Fatality 2 1 2 0 5 0 4% SH 35/ Main to Sherwood 26,000 Westminster to Woodcreek 37,000 1 Type A- ° Dixie Farm to Sunset Meadows /Winding 30,000 Incapacitating 18 17 32 2 69 5 7/° Sunset Meadows/Winding to Whispering Pines 21,000 Type B - Winding Way to FM 528 / Parkwood 16,100 Non- 90 50 121 9 270 22 1% FM 528/ Parkwood to Country Road 15,200 Incapacitating Country Road to Williamsport 11,700 Type C - Newport to Calder/ Devereux 38,000 Possible 188 79 209 1 477 39 1% Interurban to SH 3 38,000 Injury Houston to FM 270/ FM 2094 31,000 No Injury/ 157 80 157 6 400 32 8% FM 518 Split/ Manna to South Shore 16,500 Not Reported FM 1266/Columbia to Lawrence Road 9,100 Total 455 227 521 18 1,221 100% Kemah Oaks to SH 146 10,300 Table 4 1-2. Crash Data by Severity by City Table 4 1-1 Corridor AADT's The movements of the vehicles involved in the crashes were also analyzed The 1998, 1999, and 2000 crash data provided the direction of the crash along with the individual movements of each vehicle involved in the crash The crash data were summarized to include the major crashes, categorized by the relative directions of the vehicles at Corridor Origin — Destination Patterns time of impact The serious impacts were determined to be head-on,when multiple vehicles moving in a direction Origin-destination information attained from the H-GAC reveals that the majority of trips in the corridor are traveling towards each other are involved in a crash, left-turn,when at least one of the vehicles involved in the crash was three main destinations.The Texas Medical Center,the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston,and making alert-turn movement, right-turn,when at least one of the vehicles involved in the crash was making a right- toturn movement, side impact,when at least one of the vehicles involved in the crash was struck perpendicular to the Downtown Houston are the major destinations of commuters in the corridor vehicle,and rear end,when at least one of the vehicles in the crash was struck from behind, either while driving or Cha etEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft AccEss Corridor Plan K -Nan ❑Ell andAeycsorage inc. 9 G'\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan trj110 stopped,by another vehicle The crashes that were categorized as"other" involve incidents including side-swipes and improvements, median separations,and driveway consolidations outlined in Chapter 6. other non-major type collisions The breakdown of these crashes can be seen in Table 4.1-3. Cost of Crashes Movement 1998-2000 The National Safety Council was recently commissioned by the U S Congress to document and estimate the cost of Type Crashes motor vehicle crashes Their estimates of cost per injury are listed in column two of Table 4.1-6 below These figures Head-On 21 generate a total of$37,760,000 worth of economic loss to the community over three years(1998, 1999, and 2000) Left-Turn 316 Cost per Total Total Cost Right-Turn 24 Severity Injury (2000 Crashes (2000 Dollars Side Impact 165 Dollars) rounded) Fatality $3,340,000 5 $17,000,000 Rear End 504 Type A $165,000 69 $11.000,000 Pedestrian 5 Incapacitating Bicyclist 7 Type B - Non- $42,500 270 $11,000,000 Fixed Object 72 Incapacitating Other 107 Possible Injury $20,200 477 $9,000.000 Total 1221 No Injury / Table 4 1-3 Crash Summary Not Reported $1,900 400 $760,000 Total 1,221 $37,760,000 Another crash analysis tool the study team used is crash rates Crash Rate per 10C million v11T) This factor is generated by comparing traffic volumes to the Geographical Area ,= Years 1998- E' .. Table 4 1-6. Cost of Crashes number of crashes The National Safety Council uses crashes Texas ', 150 per 100 million vehicle miles of travel(VMT) This common The statistics shown above are appropriate for measuring the ecomnomic loss to the community resulting from past denominator allows for comparisons to be done between 8-County Houston p 203 motor-vehicle crashes They include the value of a person's natural desire to live longer or to protect the qulaity of roads,areas,cities, and states Exhibit 4.1-4 illustrates this FM 518 Corridor- Galveston Area itifa 197 one's life. That is,the economic loss estimates include what people are willing to pay for improved safety comparison for FM 518. Nevertheless,these estimates cannot fully represent the losses occurred when a person is involved in a serious motor vehicle crash The crash rate for the region is high at 197 crashes per 100 million Table 4 1-4 Crash Rate Comparison VMT and FM 518 has one of the worst crash rates when compared to other roads, Table 4.1-5 illustrates this point Further detail for the FM 518 corndor is documented in Table 4 1-7(on the next page), which shows the total breakdown of crashes per analysis zone for severity and the crash rate per 100 million VMT Crash Rate(per 100 million VMS The study team further analyzed crashes in the corridor by Roadway -_ Years 1998-2000 mapping the actual locations of crashes and the type of John F Kennedy 505 movement that caused them This information maybe reviewed Kirby Dnve 415 in Appendix B.By geographically analyzing the crash date, Texas Medical Center ate joimi, 314 the study team was able to document crash hot spots,otherwise known as hazardous locations were crashes have continually FM 1960 2so occurred over the three years worth of data. This information is FM 518 203 200 30C 400 50C valuable in determining mitigating strategies for intersections Table 4 1-5 Top Crash Rates in the Houston- Galveston Area Cha'ter 4 Existin• Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 10 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss Management Plan Pearland Frtendswood League City Kemah C CD c CO c co m m v I = rn Cl)vv1 C) fl N) CD a) a w co cWn a a o co (° _ CD g D = iu to to to to to to to to to COco 0 to a, to I to . • to - to to to w c O v U W - � c 01 w v rn CDo 5 Q. a 4, ,v a a 5 cc) Distance 23 22 1 8 1 5 29 12 1 8 20 26 08 1 2 15 14 1 3 1 1 255 (miles) Fatality 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 Type A- 8 4 4 2 9 2 4 2 1 5 10 7 5 4 2 69 Incapacitating Type B - Non- 15 25 29 21 20 11 16 3 10 15 31 38 21 6 9 270 Incapacitating Type C - 29 54 56 49 37 11 29 2 10 22 61 77 27 12 1 477 Possible Injury No Injury/ 32 45 51 29 36 18 15 11 12 27 37 51 23 7 6 400 Not Reported Total 84 129 141 101 102 42 64 19 33 69 139 173 76 31 18 1,221 Crashes (per 100 Million- 136 217 266 227 90 148 158 71 101 505 326 322 188 146 149 203 Vehicle-Miles) Sheets per 1, 2 3 4, 5 6 7, 8 9 10, 11 12, 13 14, 15 16 17 18 ! 19 20 21 -- Zone Table 4 1-7 Crash Statistics by Zone Chapter 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Gi♦^ Kin ey-Horn �[_ and Associates,Inc. G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kooky-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan ADAC The basic characteristics of a closed-loop system can be descnbed as follows 4.2 ROADWAY AND ACCESS INVENTORY ■ The local controllers at the individual intersections have continuous communications with a field master In the case of the FM 518 system, copper twisted-pair cable is the medium currently used for this communications This connection allows the field master to supervise the operation of its local controllers to assure that they are Functional Classification operating in the proper timingplan Also, system data a traffic volumes)can be uploaded from the local A complete functional designsystemprovides a series of distinct travel movements The six recognizable stages in p g p pt rY ( g p P Y g g intersections to the field master most trips include main movement,transition,distribution,collection,access, and termination • By means of a dial-up telephone link,each field master can be connected on an as-needed basis to a central microcomputer at TxDOT's signal shop. This allows several forms of communication to occur on an as-needed basis For example,the main movement of vehicles is usually uninterrupted, Access Function — In the event it diagnoses a malfunction,the field master can auto-dial the microcomputer to upload an alarm report high speed, longer-trip-length flow When approaching destinations — On a pre-programmed basis,the microcomputer can autodial each field master to upload system data from the freeway,vehicles reduce speed on the ramps,which act as zp4—Freeway — Personnel at the microcomputer can manually initiate the connection,either to download timing adjustments transition roadways. Vehicles then enter a moderate-speed artenal that Major Arterial Yor to diagnose a reported a problem brings them closer to their destination Next,they enter collector roads Minor Arterial that penetrate the neighborhoods Finally,the vehicle enters local g While closed-loop systems provide a basic means of providing signal coordination,they have several limitations access roads that provide a direct connection to individual residences or Z Major Collector other terminations Each of the six stages is handled by a separate . • The configuration of control groups is determined by the physical connection of the intersections to a specific 8. facility designed specifically for its function Additionally, functional Minor Collector field master In other words, a particular intersection cannot be moved from one control group to another by time classifications are generally classified by the surrounding land use form C of day Local Street • Since the central computer can communicate with only one field master at a time, an operator at the central and degree of access For example,urban and rural areas have fundamentally different characteristics in regard to density and types of —Cul-de-Sac facility does not have access to a real-time display of an entire corridor land use,density of street and highway networks,nature of travel Increasing Access patterns, and the way each of these elements is related The exhibit to Table 4.2-1 shows the phasing pattern now in use at all of the signalized intersections in the FM 518 corridor the right demonstrates the relationship of facility types to access Excluding the T-intersections(which have only one cross-street phase), 17 of FM 518's 36 minor signalized intersections currently have a split-phased sequence for the minor street The City of Houston classifies their thoroughfares into four major categories local streets,major collectors, major thoroughfares,and freeways. For planning purposes,the H-GAC has created separate area types,or land uses,that relate Major Intersections Minor Intersections roadway capacity to functional class and area type The relationship of functional class in different area types provides a Cross Intersections more detailed method of estimating the true capacity of the facility Single The FM 518 corridor plan, starting at its western terminus with SH 288 in Pearland, is an arterial with a two-way left- Cross Quad- Street Quad- Split- T-Inter- turn lane Traveling eastward,near Shadowbend Road the arterial becomes divided by a median in Friendswood Intersection Diamond Left Special Phase Left Phased section The area previously shown(Exhibit 1.0-1)contains several major and minor arterials that intersect with FM 518 and 1 and 2 SH 288 1 provide connections to collectors and local streets serving residences and businesses 3 Silverlake/CR 94 1 4 Wal-Mart (West) 1 5 Home Depot 1 Traffic Signals 6 CR 93/ Miller Ranch i 1 Signal Sequence. 7 CR 90/Southwyck 1 All 58 of the signalized intersections along FM 518 are currently maintained by TxDOT At the present time,40 of 8 Cullen 1 them are being operated in a coordinated manner as part of a closed-loop system The other 18 intersections are 9 CR 89/ Kroger 1 currently operated on an isolated, full-actuated basis Appendix B contains a map of the current signal system 10 FM 1178 / Manvel 1 groupings 11 Harkey/ Oday 1 12 Corrigan 1 13 McLean / Halbert 1 14 Mykawa 1 Table 4.2-1 Existing Signal Phase Sequences ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 12 II-VC Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan Major Intersections Minor Intersections Intersection Major Intersections Minor Intersections Cross Intersections Diamond Quad- Special Cross Intersections T-Inter- Single Single Cross Cross Quad- Street Quad- Split- T-Inter- Street Quad- Split- Intersection Diamond Left Special Phase Left Phased section Phase Left Phased 15 SH 35 1 52 Clear Creek High School 1 16 Galveston 1 53 Meadow 1 17 Old Alvin 1 54 South Shore 1 18 Walnut/ Barry Rose 1 55 Columbia Medical 1 19 Sherwood 1 56 Lawrence 1 20 Westminster 1 57 Kemah Oaks 1 21 Pearland 1 58 SH 146* 1 22 Country Club 1 TOTAL 2 8 1 18 1 16 9 23 Yost 1 35 24 Woodcreek 1 11 44 25 Wal-Mart(East) 1 55 26 Dixie Farm 1 *At the SH 146 intersection, FM 518 is the minor 27 Winding 1 — roadway ., 28 FM 2351 / Edgewood 1 Table 4 2-1 Existing Signal Phase Sequences, cont 29 Shadowbend 1 30 Spreading Oaks 1 Right-of-Way 31 Clearview 1 ROW currently varies along FM 518 from as low as 60-feet in League City to as much as 200 feet at locations in 32 Castlewood 1 Friendswood and League City The ranges for the existing ROW are shown in Table 4.2-4. 33 Whispering Pines 1 34 Winding Way 1 Railroad Crossings 35 FM 528/ Parkwood 1 36 Bay Area 1 Currently,there are two railroad crossings, one in League City and one in Pearland The League City section of 37 Palomino 1 railroad is owned and operated by the Union Pacific Railroad The Pearland Railroad is owned and operated by the 38 Landing 1 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation 39 and 40 Williamsport/ Newport - 1 41 Hobbs/ Lafayette 1 Transit Operations 42 and 43 IH-45 1 Transit Demand 44 Calder/ Devereau 1 In the year 2000, neither the household population per acre nor the employment development per acre along FM 518, 45 Interurban 1 from SH 288 to IH-45, were sufficient to support local transit services There are scattered pockets of residential 46 SH 3 1 development that exhibit strong growth potential and would be candidates for some form of fixed route transit in the 47 Houston 1 future, particularly in the Pearland area. However, currently and in the near-term, it would be difficult to support a 48 Park 1 fixed route transit network along and within the FM 518 corridor 49 Iowa 1 50 Texas 1 Existing Service 51a and 51b FM 270/FM 2094 1 Presently, demand responsive transit service is being offered by Brazoria and Galveston Counties CONNECT Transit Table 4 2-1 Existing Signal Phase Sequences, cont. does provide a demand responsive service in which anyone in Brazoria County and Galveston County can schedule a ride with a 24-hour reservation The service is similar to taxi service with point to point pick-up and drop-up and the ride is usually shared with patrons being picked up and dropped along the way The cost is a dollar a ride Chapter 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan C_II Key-Horn 13 _ and Assodates,Inc G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corndor Access Management Plan\Draft Report ('opinght©2004 Ktmlep-Horn and Associates,Inc 100 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan occupancy of the lot is between 50%and 60%. TxDOT currently sponsors 10 other Park& Pool lots in Brazona CONNECT also provides transit services three days a week to the Texas Medical Center. Patrons from Brazona and County where commuters park their cars and carpool to Houston. Galveston Counties are required to reserve a ride to the medical center There are three specific locations in the medical center where drop-off and pick-up take place METRO operates a Park&Ride lot along Bay Area Boulevard in the Clear Lake area This Park&Ride lot is north of League City,just east of IH-45 and provides a commute option for Kemah and League City commuters destined to In Pearland and other areas within Brazona County,Action,Inc,provides rides for senior citizens to area health care the downtown Houston area Further east to the Bay Area Park&Ride lot, METRO also has a Park& Pool lot that centers and other social service providers Approximately 20,000 trips are provided annually to senior citizens The allows area residents to park their and share a ride to their work destination. Many carpoolers and vanpoolers from Bay Area Transportation Management Organization provides a form of circulator service between Clear Lake and this staging lot take advantage of the HOV lane in the IH-45 corndor League City Access It appears that the existing circulator and demand responsive services take care of the current demand for transit The team reviewed development guidelines and ordinances for the three cities and found access management services However, in some areas along the FM 518 corridor,there is moderate demand for commuter service to both provisions arbitrarily mentioned in the documents. Table 4.3-3 summarizes the current state of access management Houston(Texas Medical Center and Downtown)and to Galveston Previous work conducted by the Metropolitan regulations in the corridor As part of the existing corndor influences,the team has located every access connection Transit Authority and Harris County has indicated that there is demand for Park&Ride service from Brazoria County, within the FM 518 study limits As such,an inventory of each access connection is presented below The exhibit particularly from Pearland to Houston Brazoria County already offers Park&Ride service from Angleton to Houston includes the total number of access connection within each City and classifies the locations by residential and non- However,Angleton is much further south and this service is not offered to commuters from the FM 518 area residential This information is informative in determining potential locations for driveway consolidation and or areas that present safety concern. The METRO Solutions Transit System Plan includes the development of a South Freeway(SH 288)Park&Ride lot with commuter service being proposed from the vicinity of SH 288 and Airport Boulevard While this lot may be several By City (Length in Miles) miles north of the FM 518 corridor,the commuter service is expected to attract some riders from the Pearland area Pearland Friendswood League Kemah Total Classification Direction City Carpooling and Vanpooling (16 7 mi) (5 mi) (8 7 mi) (1 1 mi) (25 5 mi) Carpool and vanpool services are another form of transit that could work quite effectively along the FM 518 Corridor Non- Eastbound 175 63 94 6 338 Ridesharing provides an opportunity for commuters to ride together and reduce the number of single-passenger Residential Westbound 190 54 145 3 392 vehicles that make the same daily trip from home to work A carpool/vanpool staging lot has been very successful in Eastbound 10 13 15 2 40 Residential the Bay Area with commuters traveling the IH-45 corridor to Houston's downtown and medical center areas. Westbound 4 16 6 11 37 Public Eastbound 2 -- -- -- 2 Currently, METRO coordinates 18 vanpools from Pearland, Friendswood, and League City The commutes are split Westbound 5 -- 9 -- 14 -between trips to Houston and Galveston,as displayed below Public Street Eastbound 28 16 24 3 71 (Unsignalized) Westbound 23 8 19 1 51 Friendswood area—5 vanpools Overall Signalized 25 8 22 2 57 • 2—Galveston Eastbound 215 92 133 11 451 • 2—TMC Westbound 222 78 179 15 494 • 1 —IH-10/West Belt Total 462 178 334 28 1,002 League City—6 Table 4 2-2 FM 518 Corridor Access by City and Driveway Type • 6—Galveston In addition to the summary,Table 4.2-2 above,a more detailed exhibit is shown below This exhibit, Table 4.2-3, Pearland—7 presents the existing access connections with associated driveway densities(per-mile) The per-mile densities will be • 5—TMC measure against nationally accepted access spacing densities(per-mile)with the product being performance standards • 1 —CBD for the corridor • 1 —Woodlands Park&Ride and Park&Pool There is a Park&Pool lot located at the southwest corner of FM 518 and SH 288 that provides a pooling place for commuters to park and share rides to regional destinations in the Houston area The Park&Pool lot was developed and is maintained by TxDOT and provides 50 spaces plus four handicap spaces for area commuters Currently,the lot is a staging lot for carpoolers and vanpoolers,no commuter bus service is provided from this lot The average daily ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 14 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan Cities Pearland Friendswood League City Kemah 0) t- C -C a C :a U (n Selected Signalized 7) 00 a rn o Crossroads c to E to to to to to to to to toI to to o to to to i— O Y O -o Y N a) Co 13 (a O � a. - aIII U a) m a m a) U CO0 co a) o C co co co a) u-) (a O O N z C - N- O O N ico (a C ca in O)co Cr) N L I 2 (a I a) C - 2 C)) (a I 2 a) g I U) LL I U) I U) co Li_ J J co LL J U) Distance 2 3 2 2 1 8 1 5 2 9 1 2 1 8 2 0 2 6 0 81 2 # 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 1 25 5 Driveways EB per 16 43 53 46 58 26 47 19 • 18 2029 35 16 15 11 452 ZONE b Driveways WB per 21 38 51 51 61 33 36 9 35 26 43 54 16 5 15 494 ZONE Total Driveways 37 81 104 97 119 59 83 28 53 46 72 89 32 20 26 946 0) (I) Driveway Density Per w 7 20 30 31 20 21 25 5 9 6 7 26 25 23 11 5 11 10 18 U Mile EB Driveway Density Per 9 17 29 34 21 27 19 6 4 5 14 33 37 36 11 5 4 14 19 Mile WB Total Driveway Density 16 37 59 65 41 48 45 14 21 59 62 60 23 0 15 24 37 Per Mile Goal Driveway Density 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Driveway Density Ratio 0 53 1 24 1 96 2 16 1 38 1 60 1 50 0 47 0 69 1 97 2 07 1.99 0.77 0 51 0 79 1 24 Table 4 2-3 Roadway Access by Zone ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Cam^ K ey-Horn I 1 and Associates Inc. 15 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draf Report Copyright©2004 Kimle}-Horn and Associates Inc tlaC Houston-Galveston Arca Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure FM 518 Land Use Pedestrian facilities along FM 518 are limited m existence New sidewalks have been constructed during new developments,however,they rarely connect with existing facilities The current sidewalks begin and end at new development and there is no connection to existing development Currently there is an on-street bike lane located in Pearland between Grand Avenue and Westminster Drive The locations of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are shown 6% in Table 4.2-4. Median and Edge Treatment t 35% An important characteristic of FM 518 is the type of median and edge treatment The majority of FM 518 is a five- lane section divided by a two-way-left-turn-lane(TWLTL) Within portions of Friendswood FM 518 has a four-lane divided section with a raised, non-traversable median. Within portions of both League City and Kemah, segments of FM 518 have an undivided four-lane cross section Finally, a segment of FM 518 near the League City-Kemah boundary has a four-lane cross section that is divided by that has a traversable non-raised median The majority of FM 518 is considered to have a rural cross section with paved shoulders while sections of FM 518 within Pearland, Friendswood,and League City have an urban cross section with curb and gutters A summary of all of the above 51 information can be found in Table 4.2-4 at the end of this chapter. 0 Non-Residential 8% 5 Special District Land Use and Zoning ❑Residential The study team collected the existing land use and zoning ordinances along FM 518 from the four municipalities ■Park Land use designations vary between the municipalities Using GIS,the study team identified residential,non- residential, parks, and special districts land uses that abut the corridor Exhibit 4.2-1 illustrates the percentages of Exhibit 4 2-1 Land Use in the FM 518 Corridor land use types in the corridor The majority of land along the corridor is zoned residential(51%)and is being used for single family dwellings Summary of Characteristics Nevertheless,a number of multi-family developments are present in Pearland and League City. Table 4.2-5 shows the existing corridor characteristics. This exhibit shows access inventory,crash data,ROW, pedestrian and bicycle facilities,and median and edge treatments "The non-residential classification encompasses land use designations from office,commercial,retail,and industrial (basically any business not operated out of a home)"Thirty-five percent of available land along the corridor cames this designation These are major destinations for shopping and services in the area Special districts are a culmination of land use designations ranging from multi-use purposes to planned unit developments Basically 8%of the land in the corridor has been examined for land use outside of the normal classification system Also,parks complete the mix of land uses by occupying 6%of the available land along the corridor These parcels are made up of recreational parks and public lands Often this designation represents ROW, drainage basins, and municipal facilities. Chapter 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 16 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan Cities Pearland Fnendswood League City Kemah cn m c v n co cn -o CD -n C -n I -n cD I cn tvcn0' n v N m v CO CO - i v (D v •� _ v na g cn o CO 0) w v a a o 0. ,Y Selected Signalized cn CD cn 0. a o I g .. to to < to to to o to to - to to cQ to 1 to = to T to to ( to v Crossroads m c� ncp i °' 'c < Iv 'r X a v 0 co 05 a - a r` 5 cn • Distance (miles) 2 3 2 2 1 8 1 5 2 9 1 2 1 8 2 0 2 6 0 8 1 2 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 1 25 5 Total Driveways 37 81 104 97 119 59 83 28 53 46 72 89 32 20 26 946 Total Driveway Density Per Mile 16 37 59 65 41 48 45 14 21 59 62 60 23 0 15 24 37 Co . Driveway Density 0 53 1 24 1 96 2 16 1 38 1 60 1 50 0 47 0 69 1 97 2 07 1 99 0 77 015 0 79 1 24 Ration Total 84 129 141 101 102 42 64 19 33 69 139 173 76 31 18 1221 ill _ . Crashes (per 136 217 266 227 90 148 158 71 101 505 326 322 188 146 149 203 million vehicle miles) TWLT TWLT TWLT TWLT TWLT TWLT TWLT TWLT TWLT 1 UNDI TWLT OT UNDI Median Type L L L L RM RM L L L L L V L R V CUR CUR CUR CUR CUR v Edge Treatment SH SH SH B B B SH SH SH SH B B CURB SH SH -- a v Sidewalks NO NO NO NO NO YES YES NO NO NO YES YES NO NO NO 0 . m- tv Bike Lanes NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO iv Speed (MPH) 39 1 37 3 28 7 27 3 28 5 27 3 28 3 44 0 44 2 38 0 23 2 23 2 39 0 36 44 0 32 8 C) 0 . . - - - Right-of-Way (ft) 100 100 100 100 80- 80- 80- 140- 140 100 80 60 120- 120 l 120 60- 150 100 140 200 200 100 127 200 Table 4.2-4. Summary of Corridor Characteristics ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan C_❑ and IGmley+bm Associates,Inc G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright C 2004 Kfmley-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 5I8 Corridor AccEss ManagEmEnt Plan 4.3 CURRENT CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Intersection Level of Service/ Delay LOS was determined for FM 518 using SynchroTM software, which uses signalized intersection LOS to calculate LOS for Link Level of Service sections on arterials The different values for approach LOS are combined by SynchroTM to give an average LOS for the Based on geographic location,three levels of capacity have been developed by H-GAC to better reflect travel patterns overall intersection Listed below in Table 4.3-2 is a summary of the intersection LOS for each signalized intersection in and roadway design characteristics These capacities were further differentiated to reflect state standards for four the corridor for both the AM and PM periods. facility types, as is shown in Table 4.3-1. These"evaluation" capacities include facility adjustments for signal green times, percent trucks, percent left turns, directional factors, etc The following are 24-hours, per-lane capacities For the FM 518 corridor the suburban arterial capacity of 6,250 was used to determine the link LOS The calculated link Intersection Existing LOS should be used for general information only. As with most urban and suburban facilities, the intersection LOS AM PM often determines the corridor's overall performance Therefore, the following section"Intersection LOS /Delay" Cycle Cycle will play a major role in determining the final performance of the facility LOS Length LOS Length Pearland Facility Type Urban Suburban Rural SH 288 West Side D 150 F 150 Freeways 23,500 23,500 16,500 SH 288 East Side C 150 A 150 Tollways 18,000 18,000 Silver Lake Village B 125 B 130 Expressways 11,000 11,000 Wal-Mart B 125 D 130 Arterials 7,500 6,250 5,000 CR 94/ Home Depot D 125 C 130 Four levels of mobility(LOM), which are used to define congestion, were developed by the H-GAC Travel Modeling CR 93/Miller Ranch B 125 B 130 Committee in 1997 and approved by the Technical Advisory Committee(TAC) They are shown as follows CR 90/Southwyck C 125 B 130 FM 865/Cullen B 125 B 130 LOM Volume/Capacity LOS CR 89/ Kroger D 125 E 130 Tolerable <0 85 A, B, C, D FM 1128 D 100 D 100 Moderate >=0 85 < 1 00 E Harkey/Oday C 90 C 90 Serious >= 1 00 < 1 25 F Woody/Corrigan A 80 A 80 Severe >= 1 25 F Halbert/ McLean D 106 F 106 Mykawa B 80 A 120 Roadways with a LOS of D was assumed to be the minimum acceptable mobility level for FM 518 Roadways with SH 35/Main E 115 E 90 LOS of E or F (moderate, serious, severe)were identified as being congested Roadways with a LOS of A through D Galveston A 115 A 90 (tolerable) were identified as not congested. Table 4.3-1, shown below are sections of the corridor and their Old Alvin B 115 C 90 associated LOS Walnut/ Berry Rose D 115 F 90 Corridor Sections LOS LOM Sherwood A 115 B 90 SH 288 West Side to FM 865 (Cullen) E Moderate Westminster B 115 C 90 CR 89 to Woody/Corrigan F Serious Pearland Parkway B 115 C 90 Woody/Corrigan to Halbert/ McLean E Moderate Liberty D 115 D 90 SH 35/ Main to Sherwood F Serious Yost B 60 A 60 Westminster to Woodcreek F Severe Woodcreek A 105 B 105 Woodcreek to Dixie Farm F Serious Wal-Mart at Dixie A 70 B 70 Sunset Meadows/Winding to Williamsport A- D Tolerable Dixie Farm F 100 F 100 Williamsport to Newport F Serious Sunset Meadows/Winding B 60 B 60 Interurban to SH 3 F Severe Friendswood Houston to FM 270/ FM 2094 F Serious FM 2351 / Edgewood E 130 E 130 FM 518 Split/ Manna to South Shore F Severe Table 4 3-2 Corridor Intersection LOS FM 1266/Columbia to SH 146 A- D Tolerable Table 4 3-1 Corridor LOS and LOM Results Chapter 4 Existing Conditions Draft AccEss Corridor Plan 18 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss ManagEmEnt Plan Current Corridor Standards Intersection Existing A thorough investigation of the City of Pearland, Friendswood, League City, and Kemah development standards have AM PM revealed the following information, Table 4.3-3 details the findings Cycle Cycle LOS Length LOS Length Shadow Bend B 130 B 130 4.4 CONCLUSIONS Spreading Oaks A 105 B 105 Clearview A 75 A 75 The crash experience hovers over 200 crashes per million VMT, which is higher than the regional average and much Castlewood B 100 B 100 higher than the national average The intersection and link LOS can be improved by making some intersection Whispering Pines C 100 D 100 modifications and by improving the signal system timing and phase sequences. The pedestrian and bicycle facilities Winding Way B 100 B 100 can also be improved by filling in some of the missing pieces and encouraging a policy that requires these facilities to League City be constructed Finally,transit service in the corridor limited to some dial and ride, and para-transit service will need FM 528/Parkwood D 100 D 100 to be examined for service expansion or available funding opportunities Bay Area Boulevard C 135 C 135 Spring Landing/ Palomino B 105 B 105 Landing Boulevard A 100 A 100 Williamsport A 100 A 100 Newport A 100 A 100 Hobbs/ Lafayette E 70 C 100 IH-45 West Side E 100 D 100 IH-45 East Side B 100 B 100 Calder/ Devereux B 100 C 120 Interurban B 100 C 120 SH 3 E 100 F 120 Houston A 100 B 120 Park A 100 A 120 Iowa A 100 A 120 Texas B 100 B 120 FM 270 F 150 F 150 FM 2094 F 150 E 150 Clear Creek High School C 100 B 120 Meadow Parkway B 100 B 120 South Shore B 100 C 120 FM 1266/Columbia B 100 B 120 Kemah Lawrence Road A 75 A 75 Kemah Oaks A 75 A 75 SH 146 B 80 B 120 Table 4 3-2 Corridor Intersection LOS,cont ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft AccEss Corridor Plan C=I1 Kmro andley-Eb Associates,lnc 19 G-\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Mr Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Cities Pearland Friendswood League City Kemah Non- Non- Non- Non- Residential - Residential Commercial Residential Residential _ Commercial Residential Residential Commercial Residential Residential Commercial _c Major Cncular*l 35' 35' 25' - 35' 25' - 35' 25' - 35' n/a 35-45 35-45 n/a n/a n/a a Collector 10' 25' - 35' 25' -35' 25' -35' 25' - 35' _ 25' -35' 20-30 35-45 35-45 n/a n/a n/a Local 10' 25' -35' 25' -35' 25' - 35' 25' - 35' 25' - 35' 20-30 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a -o Major Thoroughfares n/a 350' 350' n/a 125' 125' 20 30 30 n/a n/a n/a cn • . > Secondary , n/a 250' 250' n/a 125' 125' 20 30 30 n/a n/a n/a co aa) Thoroughfares (n Major Collectors n/a 200' 200' n/a 75' 75' 20 30 30 n/a n/a n/a c o Minor Collectors n/a 165' 165' n/a 75' _ 75' 20 30 30 n/a n/a n/a > 0 Local Streets n/a 75' 75' 50' 75' 75' 20 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a co a) _ >, a a Major Thoroughfares 100' 100' 100' n/a n/a n/a n/a 500-1000 500-1000 n/a n/a n/a U 3 > Collector Streets 60' 60' 60' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a E 00 o Local Streets 30' 30' 30' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a E 2 per 400' or> n/a 1 per 150 n/a 1 per 95' n/a n/a n/a c Driveways Per Feet of Frontage 3 per 401 -600 n/a n/a 2 per 320'150' 2 per 95-320' n/a n/a n/a co 4 per 600 or< n/a n/a 3 per 321' - n/a n/a n/a N 600' 3 per 320-600' 0 Shared Access Required n/a Yes Yes No No _ No No No No n/a n/a n/a Q Shared Access Required Yes c rn Minimum Seperation 350' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a c -o c a.) (1) 2 0- u) u) Local Streets right angle, vanaton of 10% n/a _ n/a n/a n/a _ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a a 3 Collector Streets right angle, vanaton of 5% n/a n/a n/a _ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a E U — 75 lots = 1 Lots per access point n/a n/a n/a >751ots=2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a J Zoning Ordinance Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes na n/a n/a co T _Required Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No n/a n/a n/a ca a@ ~ Q a) , -0 3 Required Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Table 4 3-3 Current Access Practices ChaptEr 4 Existing Conditions Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 20 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan IPIC Chapter 5 Additionally,where ADT exceeds 20,000 vehicles per day and the demand for mid-block turns is high, a raised median should be considered With raised medians additional safety benefits are found for pedestrian and bicycle Imp rove ME nt Options activity, in terms of having a refuge area when crossing a thoroughfare With the addition of a raised median, consideration of the median Jr l r 5.1 INTRODUCTION opening and opening type will need to occur The placement of the _ _ _ — _ Improvement options for this corridor plan have several dimensions s median opening must first consider the thoroughfare system Priority '== =,e,h-- .,t •� i, , For instance,there is short-term and long-term, safety and operational ` >- should be given to those thoroughfares providing mobility and access rl improvement and finally other improvements such as pedestrian and . ilhillr - throughout the community Then,the opening can consider other traffic Left-ru nt r.Ingress fro One Direction bicycle and policy recommendations To organize these improvements the 1 , , generators along the corridor The median treatment can take on many team has created four separate categories of improvements !� � r different forms Exhibit 5.2-2 illustrates five variations available for a _ — — )r l _ _ r • median opening — _ • Safety . .. �= ;� _ �K $:>��_ �t- . — ii`s-- 1 • Operational Len,Turn Egress from One App h • Policy Driveway Consolidation • Other Improvements 16k This technique involves removing or relocating existing access J l connections(driveways)for the sole purpose of improving safety. - — — '' — — --- The following sections will detail the available improvements within each Research has shows that driveways that are closely spaced can have "�' '— _ .�'' _ option p -'" Example of a Raised Median direct impact on safety along a roadway Moreover, research has found 1 ri that a nexus exists between access connection density and crash rates,as Left-Turn Egress from Two Approaches 5.2 SAFETY indicated in Exhibit 5.2-3. As you can see as the density of access connections increase the crash rates increase 1 1. ~_ As described in Chapter 5,safety in the corridor is a major issue With more than 400 crashes each year some `yy — type of safety improvement should be considered Safety improvements are largely concepts derived from access T r( management techniques Below are two techniques that can be used for this study Composite Crash Rate Indices Left-Turn Ingress from One Direction and Left-Turn Egress from One Approach • Median Installation • Driveway Consolidation - J t t l 5 4.1 _ — Raised Median Installation CD 4. = — — — — l't This technique involves adding a raised median barrier to restrict the a °' 2 g T,rn Ingress from Two Directions movement of traffic and thereby reduce the number of conflicts in the • 3' 2.1 corridor Exhibit 5 2-1 illustrates that any full access location(there ■ r a 1 Exhibit t-T n Median Treatments are 32)creates potential conflict points With the introduction of a 4 2. 1.3 raised median barrier to restrict the left out maneuver the conflict ' a 1 points are reduced by 50% • 1 ' I \; • ■ I c Roadways with non-traversable medians are safer at higher speeds and o ± at higher undividedroadways her traffic volumes than d s or those with - armr Io ze 3° se 60 io y___ Conf I ict Points Access Points per Mile continuous TWLTL Numerous studies from across the nation have ■ • 16 Crossing been conducted relating to undivided,TWLTL, and divided roadways • 8 Diverge Exhibit 5 2-3 Composite Crash Rate Indices with a non-traversable median Based on studies, it can be concluded • 8 Merge s with a non-traversable median have an average crash 32 Total that roadways g Driveway consolidation is only possible through a cooperative agreement between the rate about 30% less than roadways with a TWLTL. Exhibit 5.2-1 Conflict Points property owner and the agency attempting to consolidate the driveway Application of this technique will be focused on the greatest need. For instance,those areas in the Exhibit 5 2-4 Driveway Consolidation corridor with very high safety ratio(as described m Chapter 3)will be evaluated for Chapter 5 Improvement Options Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Earl Kfnley-Horn and Kssodates,lnc. 21 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc I—PAC Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan possible consolidation Each situation is unique and a great deal of negotiation will need to occur between all parties Signal Timing involves The spacing between driveways can be found in Chapter 4.4. g Signal timing is a cntical technique to improve the overall traffic flow throughout the corridor. The timing of signals 5.3 OPERTATIONAL often involves coordinating an entire signal system For the FM 518 corridor,most of the signals are part of a coordinated signal system and any recommendation related to signal timing should consider the ramifications of the In addition to safety,the operations in the corridor are another vital goal of this overall corridor study system as a whole rather than an isolated signal The operational improvements for this corridor can be broken down into several distinct pieces. • Right-Turn Lane 5.4 POLICY • Left-Turn Lane Authority Purpose and • Signal Timing This document will ultimately serve as an overlay for land use and design related issues throughout the corridor Right-Turn Lane The access policy direction must be established in terms of • Coordination with TxDOT The addition of acceleration and deceleration lanes can provide operational benefits throughout the corridor by • Shared and Cross Access Provisions allowing turning vehicles to exit the roadway without effecting the through movement of traffic This allows for a • Thoroughfare Planning more efficient flow of traffic in the corridor and allows • Design Guidelines vehicles to form platoons at the signalized intersections, thereby maximizing the flows that the signal can handle - a F Full Il°«,LencMn - Moen L -- Coordination with TxDOT Lengths of auxiliary lanes are a function of posted speed,but °° On September 25, 2003 the TxDOT Transportation Commission,adopted the State's proposed rules on access ` Alm dealer°„°° queue lengths are normally established on a case by case basis t® ® t�l ® " °' management The newly adopted rules direct TxDOT to apply access management statewide. In addition,the rules The Highway Capacity Manual and TxDOT's Operations and . activate TxDOT's new manual on access management. The manual includes general policy implications and Procedures Manual provide guidance on this matter Exhibit — �i k®1 minimum driveway spacing criteria along state highways There is a provision in the manual for local agencies to 5.3-1 illustrates the general layout and design for a right-turn — develop corridor access plan in corporation with TxDOT which could become a corridor overlay lane These improvements are not one size fits all °,,,,, --Stera°e -- Maneuver DIStolti - Consideration must be given for posted speed,traffic volume, This corridor overlay would then supercede any criteria established by the local agency and/or TxDOT The benefit Tim Bo lenotn and development type. of this approach is to allow for a more coordinated effort among all agencies involved Moreover, it provides an interactive mechanism for developers and landowner to understand the vision for the corridor and gain general Lane Exhibit 5 3-1 Right-Turn Lane confidence of future access decisions in the corridor If agreed to,all the agencies involved can enter into an inter- Left-Turnlocal agreement to activate this comdor access plan and provide for a clear delineation of access authority in the Much like right-turn lanes, left-turn lanes also allow the turning vehicles to exit the through lanes without affecting corridor the through traffic However,these lanes —.1 generally provide for more queue storage - Shared and Cross Access Provisions r i! for left turning vehicles for both signalized Access management is much more than just spacing of driveways I —I 7.111 ' and un-signalized intersections Exhibit 5.3-2 and providing raised medians In order to fully realize the benefits illustrates the general design elements for a R of access management, certain land use provisions should be I- - left-turn lane The length of deceleration ./� e2 Median Width provided in local municipalities subdivision code and zoning Rear Cross Access Drive ` should consider the posted speed and the Separator r ordinance amount of speed differential acceptable for rove the thoroughfare I. Storage I Deceleration Subdivision ordinances can require property owners to dedicate Wa 0 ,1 1 �� I. Total Length land on their common property lines or develop joint access 1" ri IL............ . "... An easements A parking lot cross access provision assures that a single driveway can serve both properties The result is greater 9 Exhibit 5 3-2 Left-Turn Lane internal circulation between neighboring properties,which allows Front Cross Access Drive vehicles to circulate between businesses without having to re-enter Exhibit 5 4-1 Cross Access the major roadway and overall fewer driveways(see Exhibit 5.4-1) Chapter 5 ImprovEmEnt Options Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 22 IOCHouston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan The result of this effort may take on two separate forms The first, is one which the team identifies in the aerial Deceleration Lane Tolerances photos and project list specific locations that would benefit from sharing access The second, involves providing When a raised median is present and a left-turn deceleration lane shall be provided for every opening Right-turn changes to the local agencies guidelines to initiate a shared access provision deceleration lanes shall be required when the peak hour turning movement is greater than 60 vehicles p.m. Ma- Arte' Thoroughfare Planning —Jm SL 5.5 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS The local government code provides the authority for local agencies to adopt and v' Resner a ,,.. implement thoroughfare plans These plans generally describe the alignment and sal ; i Raised medians,driveway consolidations, signal timing, shared access and cross access, ROW requirements for major thoroughfares through a community This policy i --� `� - access spacing, and thoroughfare planning all translate into benefits for pedestrians, goes a step further and investigates the potential for the use of collector roads and s ', bicycles,and the rapidity of transit Several additional techniques that exist to expand the s backage roads to serve local developments without adding more turning traffic _ h�` multi-model flavor of this corridor might be the addition of pedestrian pedestrian amenities, onto the major thoroughfares These roads will generally be localized and �s ne-> s sr bicycle lanes,and transit service dependent on site development and property boundaries. Exhibit 5.4-2 I demonstrates these concepts Recommendations to this end will be documented on the corridor aerial photos found in Appendix A. Transit Service Developing a set of viable transportation alternative will be centered on building ridership Exhibit 5 4-2 Thoroughfare for future high capacity transit service This not only includes making better use of the existing roadway capacity, but Design Guidelines Planning also includes managing the demand for travel in the corridor Transportation Demand Management(TDM) is a set of These guidelines shall form the basis for technical guidance with regard to access decisions along FM 518 Specific strategies designed to make the best use of existing transportation facilities as well as enhancing transportation guidelines have been developed for access connection(driveway) spacing and median opening spacing improvements Using strategies that promote alternative modes, increase vehicle occupancy,reduce travel distances, and ease peak-hour congestion,TDM increases the efficiency and effectiveness of the transportation system Access Connections The access connection distances in the following sections are intended for passenger cars on a level grade. Approaches include These distances may be increased for downgrades,truck traffic,or • Strategies topromote alternative modes of travel, such as carpooling,van oolin transit, biking,and walking where otherwise indicated for the specific circumstances of the site Minimum Connection Spacingg p g� g and the roadway In other cases,shorter distances may be appropriate Posted Speed Distance (FT) • Projects designed to maximize the efficient use of parking resources • Efforts to shift travel demand to"nonpeak"periods,by promoting flexible work schedules and variable work to provide reasonable access,and such decisions should be based on (MPH) hours safety and operational factors supported by an engineering study < 30 200 • Attempts to eliminate the demand for some trips through teleworking,teleconferencing, etc 35 250 • Augmentation and coordination of existing demand response transit provisions The distance between access connections, measured along the edge of 40 305 the traveled way from the closest edge of pavement of the first access 45 360 connection to the closest edge of pavement of the second access > 50 425 Pedestrian Amenities connection. Exhibit 5.4-3 provides minimum connection spacing — - One improvement technique involves the possible addition of sidewalks and criteria for FM 158 Exhibit 5 4-3 Minimum curb ramps along the corridor As identified in the existing conditions report -'-. 'Iz. , -I; Connection Spacing many areas throughout the corridor do not have sidewalks,therefore {.`� .�'' t`,.' ' t..:„..A opportunities to fill in the missing pieces are presented. / ` �� 1 . it A lesser connection spacing than set forth in this document may be allowed in the following situations " 't - ■ To keep from land-locking a property Bicycle Lanes �"` ■ Replacement or re-establishment of access to the highway under a reconstruction/rehabilitation projects The need and feasibility of adding on-road bicycle facilities will be t investigated Additional coordination will occur to connect off-road bicycle Median Installation facilities with any on-road bike lanes The minimum width of any on-road Openings should only be provided for street intersections or at intervals for major developed areas Spacing between bicycle facility will be five-feet and 10-feet for off-road recreational trails. median openings must be adequate to allow for introduction of left-turn with proper deceleration and storage lengths Refer to TxDOT Design Guidelines for proper deceleration and storage lengths. ChaptEr 5 improvement Options Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑VII �a Associates,lnc. 23 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Chapter S Improvement Options Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 24 Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan trj/10 should be applied. In addition to raised medians,the team also looked for opportunities to consolidate driveways that are too close to major intersections and eliminate dnveways that were in close proximity to other dnveways. Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements 6.3 OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS The following recommendations provide H-GAC, TxDOT,and the Cities with a list of operational improvement to 6.1 INTRODUCTION improve the overall corridor level of service One of the primary goals for the FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan is to identify short-term transportation Traffic Signal Improvements solutions This involved evaluating every signalized intersection within the study limits,providing recommendations Signal timing can greatly reduce the overall corridor delay In order to capitalize on these improvements the signal for medians improvements,and consideration for the consolidation of driveways The following sections detail the system as a whole needs to be evaluated(Appendix C depicts the limits of the signal systems) In addition to a study team's methodology,provide recommendations for intersection improvements, and median and driveway comprehensive retiming of all intersections and closed-loop systems,the study team recommends the following traffic consolidations signal modifications 6.2 METHODOLOGY Elimination of"Split-Phased" Signal Sequences: An intersection is said to be"split-phased" if all traffic from one direction moves dunng one phase followed by all traffic from the opposite direction moving during the next phase The sequence in which the left-turn phases occur Operational Improvements concurrently(if needed)followed the concurrent service of the opposing through movements is referred to as"quad- Traffic conditions modeling is one of the primary tools that transportation planners and engineers use to evaluate left"phasing current and future corridor conditions Using current intersection traffic counts and SynchroTM software,the study team evaluated every signalized intersection. As seen in Chapter 4,Current Corridor Conditions,many intersections Table 4.2-1 showed the phasing pattern now in use at all of the signalized intersections in the FM 518 corridor are operating at an unacceptable level of service. Based on current traffic counts,field observation,and public involvement the study team tested various intersection improvement options with the use of our SynchroTM model in In some cases, such as the East Walnut/Barry Rose intersection in Pearland, split-phasing is appropriate because of an attempt to optimize both the intersections and the overall corridor mobility This process involved not only the unusual geometry of the intersection As a general rule,however, split-phasing of the cross street should be modeling recommended physical improvements such as left turn and right turn lanes but also, included optimizing the avoided because of the following operational disadvantages intersection phasing,timing,and offsets --- ..,_� Boundary of Intersection In light traffic, substantially more major street red time is required to service the minor street traffic As an example, consider the instance of only one vehicle being present on each minor street approach. Safety Improvements Providing for raised medians can greatly improve the i ♦ If the minor street is split-phased,both cross street phases must be served for a minimum time Assuming a minimum overall safety in the corridor As described in Chapter 4, j green of about five seconds plus typical yellow and all-red times,the major street signals must be red for at least 20 Current Corridor Conditions,there is a high number of Physical Area I I seconds to accommodate these two cars crashes that are occurrmg throughout the corridor Raised MO Functional Area ---' f medians minimize the conflict points along a roadway and ' In comparison, if the minor street has just a single phase,both cars could typically be accommodated during 10— 12 provide for safe pedestrian refuge The team's _ seconds of major street red time. methodology for the location and benefit from raised ..__._ E., median was primarily based on areas that experience a - An even greater problem stems from the accommodation of pedestrians crossing the major street. To accommodate high crash history Relative to the location of full-access -- one pedestrian,the controller must sequentially time the following intervals. • A"Walk" interval of at least four seconds median openings was given first to public street connections and then to major private developments ■ "Flashing Don't Walk"pedestrian clearance interval,which must be long enough to allow pedestrian who has In most cases the study team did not recommend median just started his or her crossing to reach the far side of the street. Assuming a walking speed of four-feet per openings that would be so close to major intersections that second,the typical pedestrian clearance time to cross FM 518 is about 17 seconds Although the vehicular they would influence the functional intersection area yellow and all-red intervals can be timed concurrently with the last few seconds of the pedestrian clearance, Exhibit 6.2-1 provides an example of how this technique usual practice is to time them following the pedestrian clearance Exhibit 6 2-1 Functional Intersection Area Chapter 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan nun :Associates,inc 25 G'\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc 1-10r4)0 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Accordingly, about 26 seconds of major street red time is required to accommodate the crossing of just one TYPICAL MINOR STREET LANE CONFIGURATIONS pedestrian Along arterial roadways such as FM 518,the pedestrian phases are typically actuated and the pedestrian intervals are timed only in response to a push button actuation TYPICAL SPLIT PHASED SIGNAL SEQUENCE A EXISTING 1 (CREATES NEED FOR SPLIT-PHASING) 1 -Nal W- A 1 A 1A all A1110.- — r1 - - 1 1 1 A CONCURRENT CONCURRENT THROUGH SOUTHBOUND THROUGH NORTHBOUND THROUGH ALTERNATIVE LEFT TURNS MOVEMENTS AND MOVEMENT AND PED MOVEMENT AND PED CONFIGURATIONS ON MAJOR STREET CONCURRENT PED PHASE FOR THE N-S PHASE FOR THE N-S (DO NOT REQUIRE PHASES FOR THE E-W CROSSWALK ON THE CROSSWALK ON THE A CROSSWALK ON THE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SPIT-PHASING) 1 ► NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES Exhibit 6 3-1 Typical Split Phased Signal Sequence A ► 1 As illustrated in Exhibit 6.3-1,split-phasing creates the following problem if there happens to be need to serve a pedestrian call for crosswalks on both sides of the cross street. Exhibit 6 3-2 Typical Minor Street Lane Configuration • Since a green arrow cannot be displayed in conflict with a"Walk"or"Flashing Don't Walk" interval,the crosswalk on the west side of the intersection must be associated with the southbound vehicular phase and the By adding one lane, each minor approach can be reconfigured to have a left-only lane, a straight-only lane,and a crosswalk on the east side of the intersection must be associated with the northbound vehicular phase right-only lane,which would allow the following operational efficiencies • Accordingly, if the intersection is split-phased,these pedestrian services must occur sequentially and 52- seconds or more of major street red time is required to accommodate the two pedestrians • Pedestrians can be accommodated concurrently on the parallel north-south crosswalks • In contrast,virtually any other phasing pattern would allow these two pedestrian services to be accommodated • At intersections where the minor approaches have low left-turning volumes, all cross-street vehicular traffic concurrently in only 26-seconds of major street red time can be accommodated during a single phase ■ Even if the minor approach left-turn volumes are high enough to need a protected phase, protected-permitted To avoid these inefficiencies, it is recommended that split-phasing be avoided whenever other intersections are newly mode can normally be used Accordingly, some of the left-turns can take place during the circular green, signalized Also,as funding permits, it is recommended that the currently split-phased minor intersections be thereby minimizing the major street red time Furthermore, during very light traffic periods,the cross street reconfigured to allow them to operate in a more efficient manner As an example, Exhibit 6.3-2 illustrates a typical left turn phases can be omitted entirely,possibly allowing the use of a shorter signal cycle. configuration of a split-phased minor intersection on FM 518 In this example, each minor approach has two lanes— a"left or straight"lane and a right-only lane Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 26 tlIDEIC Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Protected-Only versus Protected-Permitted Left Turns• threshold and Pearland will soon follow Accordingly,the geographic deployment of systems should follow City Many of the signalized intersections along FM 518 currently have protected-only left turns Especially in light traffic, boundaries to facilitate a particular City taking over the operation of all the signals within its boundaries the down side of this mode of operation is that a left-turning driver must wait for the green arrow even though there maybe many opportunities for left turns to be made safely on a permitted basis during the circular green Specific Signal and Intersection Improvements The addition of dedicated right-turn lanes and left-turn lanes reduces platoon disruptions and enhance efficient signal On the other hand, one potential advantage of protected-only mode is that the lead-lag phase sequences can be used to operation The team identified many capacity improvements that may be accomplished with re-striping or additional optimize two-way progression without creating"yellow trap" issues (If a lagging left turn occurs opposite a leading pavement Table 6.3-1 identifies these improvements and the accompanying signal cycle length changes protected-permitted left turn, a"yellow trap"condition is said to occur because the left turning driver is facing a yellow signal even though opposing through traffic still has a green Accordingly, a left turning driver waiting in the Intersection Add Capacity Phase intersection does not have the opportunity to clear safely during the yellow) ID I Name Short Med Timing Change • Pearland • Because of speeds and volumes,protected-only operation is probably appropriate at many of the intersections along 1 SH 288 West Side FM 518 In any event,the progression benefits of being able to use lead-lag sequences should be evaluated prior to 2 SH 288 East Side . WB (Right) X RT overlap anydecision to convert aparticular location to protected-permitted mode Silverlake Village/ p p 3 CR 94A NB (Right, Through, Left), SB (Left, Shared Right Through) X _ EB (Right) SB (Left, Through, Right) X Short-Term Signal System Improvements NB (Left, Shared Right-Through), SB (Left, Shared Right- The following short-term signal system improvements should be made as soon as possible. 4 Wal-Mart Through) X SO-it-phased NB (Dual Left, Shared Right-Through), SB (Left, Shared Right- ■ The remaining isolated intersections should be incorporated into closed-loop systems. This could be done by 5 CR 94/Home Depot Through) XSp+t-used expanding the geographical limits of the existing systems, by installing new closed-loop systems per SB (Left, Through, Right) X TxDOT's specification,or some combination thereof. 6 CR 93/Miller Ranch • The timing of all of the systems should be optimized for current traffic 7 CR 90/Southwyck 8 FM 865/Cullen SB (Left, Through, Right) X Split phased Other Signal System Improvements Boulevard The current state-of-the-art for microcomputer-based signal systems is the distributed system,which does not have SB (Dual Left, Through, Right) X field masters Instead,using a continuous communications link,the central computer polls each intersection on a 9 CR 89/Kroger Split phased 10 FM 1128/Manvel NB (Dual Left. Shared Right-Through), SB (Left, Through Right) X Sp1+t-phased continuous basis. 11 Harkey/Oday , NB (Left, Through, Right), SB (Left, Shared Right-Through) X 12 Woody/Corrigan As compared with a closed-loop system,the distributed system has the following benefits Halbert/McLean/ 13 Walnut Halbert One-way X Single-phase • The control groups can easily be reconfigured on a time of day basis Halbert Cul-de-sac X • An operator at the central facility has access to real-time displays of the status of the entire system(rather than 14 Mykawa - being limited to connection with one field master at a time). 15 SH 35/Main WB (Right) X Add logic plan EB (Dual Left, Right), NB and SB (Dual Left, Right) X As the FM 518 corridor continues to grow,there will be increasing need for a more capable traffic management 16 Galveston system Therefore, it is recommended that communications infrastructure be upgraded over the next several years to 17 Old Alvin WB (Right) X support the eventual implementation of distributed signal systems 18 Walnut/Berry Rose X Right-turn overlap Although twisted-pair cable can fully support signal system data communications, fiber optic cable provides the 19 Sherwood X Re-align north additional bandwidth needed for closed-circuit television(CCTV)and other intelligent transportation system(ITS) leg 2 Westminster X Single phase applications Therefore,all new communication cable should be fiber optic rather than copper. This would include 1 21 Pearland Parkway "EB and WB (Right), NB (Dual Left, Through, Right-Through) X cable installed to connect currently isolate intersections as well as any cable that may be installed to replace the 22 Liberty/Country Club *EB (Right), NB and SB (Left, Shared Right-Through) X Add quad-left existing copper cable The freeway management system communications network should evolve to provide the . NB and SB (Left, Through, Right) X _ means for linking the signals on specific arterial corridors(e g FM 518)with TxDOT's traffic signal management 26 Dixie Farm _ WB and EB (Dual Left, Right) . X facility. 26a Pine Hollow X New Signal Currently planned by the City of Pearland Whenever the 50,000 population threshold is reached,TxDOT requires that a city take over the operation and Table 6 3-1 Intersection Improvements maintenance of the signals along non-freeway State-maintained roadways League City has already reached this Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft Access Corridor Plan Khi ey-Horn ❑�I' 1 and Assortes,Inc 27 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan 1-1D/0 Intersection Add Capacity Phase Recommended Intersection Improvements Explained ID Name Short Med Timing Change These improvements are vital to the reduction of congestion along FM 518 The following section details the Friendswood improvement by intersection Please refer to the aerial graphics in Appendix A for graphic depiction of the 28 FM 2351 /Edgewood SEB(Right) X improvements NEB and SWB (Left), SEB (Right) X 29 Shadow Bend 1 and 2 SH 288 West Side and East Side 30 Spreading Oaks This interchange currently uses the"TTI 4-phase" signal sequence, which is the standard for diamond interchange 31 Clearview signals in the greater Houston area. During the AM peak,the critical movement is the westbound right turn, which 32 Castlewood currently has Just a shared lane even though its volume is extremely high at 1,759 vehicles per hour. The critical 33 Whispering Pines NWB (Left) X movements during the PM peak are the southbound frontage road movement and the westbound right-turn With 34 Winding Way standard TTI phasing, these movements are conflicting except for a few seconds of internal advance time 35 FM 528/Parkwood SWB (Dual left) X SWB (Right), NEB (Dual left) X The westbound external approach currently has two lanes, designated as straight-only and straight-or-right. As an immediate improvement. 36 Bay Area Boulevard WB (Right) X Spring Landing/ Short-Term Recommendations 37 Palomino NB and SB (Left) Restnpe Lanes X Add quad left • The right-hand lane should be designated as a"right-only" lane 38 Landing Boulevard WB (Dual Left) X ■ The signal sequence should be modified to provide an"overlap"that will allow the westbound right-turn to 39 Williamsport Boulevard/ move concurrently with a portion of the southbound frontage road phase In the 130-second cycle PM timing Newport Boulevard scenario (shown in Exhibit 6.3-3),the overlap would be in operation for 52 of the 68-seconds allocated to the 40 Newport southbound frontage road 41 Hobbs/Lafayette WB (Dual Left), NB (Dual Right)Widen Hobbs two X _-__._..... SB lanes ui-• Ui Ui tti 42 IH-45 West Side EB (Dual Right) Begin new right as additional X 02 S 0a S 012 V-01 auxiliary lane Eli M = 43 IH-45 East Side EB (Dual Left) X +tt2* tt2 #2 u2 tt2 44 Calder/Devereux 'Y 016 4 05 —`►012 as 08 IME ` 45 Interurban NB (Left) X Add single phase _ 46 SH 3 SB (Right) NB,SB,EB and WB (Left) X Optimize Exhibit 6 3-3 130-second cycle PM timing scenario 47 Houston j4 2 / • The westbound approach should be widened 'U 48 Park 49 Iowa on the right to provide one additional lane L 50 Texas NB (add lane designate as two lefts with a shared right) X This lane should develop as short a distance as N 51a FM 270 practical west of the Silverlake Village/ CR 94A intersection. 51b FM 2094 WB (Extend inside left lane to accommodate queue) X Z1— Develop new NB roadway(create a partial continuous <--- flow intersection) X ■ The added lane should also be designated as a - Kemah Add Capacity Short Med Timing Change right-only lane, 1 e there will be two right- FM 5L8 57 Kemah Oaks only lanes and one straight-only lane(see =-Y ,1 ; r' 57a Wal-Mart Recommend TxDOT signal warrant be conducted X New Signal Exhibit 6.3-4). (There is also an existing left- 58 SH 146 turn lane that develops a short distance in i advance of the east intersection for use by the l///,, As volumes increase prohibit left turn movements during peak hours vehicles that will be turning left at the west Table 6 3-1. Intersection Improvements, cont intersection ) --- ExIsr[MG LAMS — PROPOSED SHORT RANGE [hPROYEhEMT PROPOSED MEDIUM RANGE I heROVEhEMr i Exhibit 6 3-4 SH 288 East Intersection Recommendation ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 28 tlaCHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan 3. Silverlake Village/CR 94A 3 5 CR 94A/Home Depot This intersection is currently split-phased for the north-south This intersection is currently split-phased for the north-south movement In both directions,the current lane movement Based solely on the volumes,this appears to be J 1 L configuration is left-only, left or straight, and right only In the northbound direction,the left-turning volumes unnecessary is heavy enough(400+VPH dunng the AM peak)to warrant more than one lane Short-Term Recommendations. �I`�. Short-Term Recommendations 5 6- • Re-stripe the northbound and southbound approaches I --- ■ Re-stripe the northbound approaches to have two left- N from their current configuration(left-only, shared ,) I. �"- - FM fie only and one straight or right and the southbound to have ) 1 Lg straight-or-left,and right only)to left-only, straight- one left-only,one straight-only, and one right-only. only, and right-only. This will allow the north-south -_ , r • This change will eliminate the need for split-phasing by through movements(and more importantly the allowing the north-south through movements(and more ,rJ L pedestrian movements)to operate concurrently ; 1 I f importantly the pedestrian movements)to operate _ I I concurrently Because of the double left lanes, it may be I , _ • Provide the left turns with protected-permitted(rather appropriate for the northbound left turn be protected- ., ,:is-- `^ FM El it than protected-only)signalization N only However,the southbound left should be protected- _-_} t r� --- EX I ST I NO LANES permitted. --— NENT Medium-Term Recommendations — PROPOSED 4 DIUCRT RANGE [MPROYEEMEN —PROPOSED t�IUN RANGE ChPROVEhfNr Rq� • Provide southbound left through and right Medium-Term Recommendations 11 11 • Provide eastbound right Widen the northbound approach by one lane, in which case Exhibit 6 3-5 Silverlake Village Recommendation the four approach lanes would be designated as follows two left-only,one straight-only, and one right-only ___ exlsrlMac LAMES 4 Wal-Mart Driveway This change would facilitate the ability for northbound - PROPOSED SHORT Rana IIPREWEitENT This intersection is also split-phased for the north-south movements, perhaps because the two-lane approaches are traffic to make right turns on red. —PROPO9EO hfO[uN RANEE IMPR3VEtfT1T currently designated as straight-or-left and right-only The one benefit of this configuration is that the right-only lanes facilitate the making of right turns on red Exhibit 6 3-7 CR 94/Home Depot 4 6 CR 93 /Miller Ranch Short-Term Recommendations. Pi No changes are recommended • Re-designate the northbound and southbound 3 approaches as left-only and straight-or-right 7 CR 90/Southwyck• W No changes are recommended J 1 t,.L • This configuration will eliminate the need for4 I\ split-phasing since the north-south through 8 FM 865/Cullen Boulevard .t--- movements(and more importantly the north-south I I -,-__ This intersection is split-phased for the north-south movement pedestrian phases)could operate concurrently A : y� FM 3I8 However,given the volumes,this is probably an appropriate way to ; ; I —__ Also, if north-south protected left turns are -- r operate the intersection at the present time. A planned project will ,' , o y^ FM el needed,they should be protected-permitted :__r realign CR 89 to enter FM 518 opposite Cullen Boulevard !_ 1 1,,.,,,t1,,.,,, Medium-Term Recommendations. Short-Term Recommendations Restripe northbound and southbound to eliminate split 1 r by one-lane and designate as left-only, straight-or- phasing i1 t r left, and right only,thereby restoring the facility of Medium-Term Recommendations right turns on red EXISTING LAMES Ex[sTIM� LeasI I ■ Based on a manual reassignment of the existing volumes,the — PROPOSED SNORT FRAME IMf'RovE EAr - PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IMPROVEMENT -PROPOSED MEDIUM RAMGE IMPROMEMERT -PROPOSED MEDIUM RANGE IM'ROVD.ENT new intersection's northbound and southbound approaches should have four-lanes(two left-only,one straight-only, and Exhibit 6 3-6 Wal-Mart Drivewa Recommendation one right-only),aligned such that the split-phasing will not Exhibit 6 3-8 FM 865/Cullen Boulevard y be necessary Recommendation Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Rmley-Horn van wtdA s,ifc 29 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan ti&C 12. Woody/Corrigan 9 CR 89/Kroger No changes are recommended This intersection is also split-phased for the north-south movement at the present time 13 Halbert/McLean/Walnut. Medium-Term Recommendations For signal operations purposes,this complicated pair of intersections has five legs The eastbound approach of the • Once CR 89 is realigned,the north-south traffic will be substantially less and this intersection should have a Walnut/McLean intersection can be served concurrently with the eastbound and westbound legs of the FM 518's single north-south phase(with permitted-only left turns) intersection with McLean and Halbert The other three legs(westbound Walnut,northbound McLean, and 1 d southbound Halbert)must be served sequentially 10 FM 1128/Manvel This intersection is split-phased for the north-south movement One of the improvement scenarios consisted of closing the eastbound connection from FM 518 to Walnut and The northbound and southbound approaches each have two lanes installing a median on McLean through its intersection with Walnut This would convert that intersection into a T- and the southbound approach is currently striped as left-only and intersection that would allow only the right turn movement from Walnut onto McLean This scenario would have the straight-or-right However,the northbound approach is striped as side effect or causing considerable traffic to have to find new routes to get to and from Walnut Some of these routes left-or-straight and right-only ,: , : would possibly involve minor residential streets,resulting in complaints from those residents , r a r. FY 516 Short-Term Recommendations. Short-Term Recommendations • Widen the northbound approach to provide for dual left- __� T1 (* ■ Make Halbert one-way northbound in the block 1 3 J only lanes and a straight-or-right,thereby eliminating the immediately north of FM 518. The benefit of this change need for this intersection to be split-phased 11 r would be the elimination of one of the signal phases that must now be served sequentially The current southbound Medium-Term Recommendations I 11 volumes on Halbert are low, 14 VPH in the AM and I ` ' " 1I • Once Manvel to Cullen is completed lane assignments I 54 VPH in the PM Because connections are available __ shoulshould be modified to for the northbound approach to have - ExSatP d `hortonea to other north-south streets, it is felt that this change would --- d Proposes Short Range Improvement5 designated left-only, straight-only,and right-only lanes — Proposes Medium Rae [� ve roment cause minimal inconvenience for the residents and other FM ii� Rowe users of Halbert --t -Exhibit 6 3-9 FM 1128/Manvel Recommendations 11 Harkey/Oday Other Recommendations. This intersection already has a quad-left signal sequence and its As discussed below,the possible future extension of LOS of C for the AM peak and B for the PM peak However, i Mykawa may afford an opportunity to de-emphasize the northbound right-turn lane has relatively high volumes, E Walnut between McLean and Mykawa and further 225 VPH dunn the AM peak improve the efficiency of the FM 518/Walnut/McLean --- EXISTING s g P --- PROPOSED SNORT RANGE I MPROYGMENT intersection —PROPOSED NEDIUM RANGE [MPROVEIEMT Short-Term Recommendations • Widen the northbound approach to provide a right- _ Exhibit 6 3-11 Halbert/McLean/Walnut Recommendation only lane i `-- Kv a FM At 14 Mykawa ___` `, t•` This is a T-intersection and the minor approach has two lanes(designated as right-only and left-only) No ---' I : modifications are recommended at this time It should be noted that the Pearland Thoroughfare Plan calls for {r Mykawa to be extended to the south Other Recommendations Whenever that extension is designed,the possible de-emphasis of Walnut west of Mykawa should be considered --- Ex[STE M6 Li 1Es The benefits would be the elimination of the signal at McLean and Walnut,which would greatly improve the PROPOSED SHORT RANGE [I I4 EMEMT efficiencyof the signal at FM 518 and McLean IMPROVEMENT—PROPOSED MEDIUM RAMOE PROROVEMENT g Exhibit 6 3-10. HarkeyOday/ Recommendation ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 30 tlaCHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan 15 SH 35 /Main The pedestrian movement for the east side of the intersection is currently associated with the Walnut phase However, This intersection is essentially at capacity and even with 1 5 m this may present an unexpected conflict for the drivers on Walnut Because of the angle, a driver proceeding from optimized timing would operate at LOS of D during the AM and A Walnut onto eastbound FM 518 may not perceive this movement to be a right turn and therefore may not realize that PM peaks Widening is restricted by ROW constraints, so the he or she is obliged to yield to pedestrians in the particular crosswalk following additional lanes are concentrated in the medium-term JI 1 LL Short-Term Recommendations Short-Term Recommendations • Prohibit pedestrian crossings on the east side of the intersection. Instead, all north-south pedestrian crossings • Widen the westbound intersection to provide for a right- ; I l ''-__ would be required to occur on the west side. The west crossing is associated with the Barry Rose phase and only lane FR 618 drivers from this approach would be much more likely to perceive that they are making a right turn and are III therefore obliged to yield to pedestrians Medium-Term Recommendations ,'� ■ Revise the signal phasing to provide a"right-turn overlap"for the eastbound right turn movement from • Add an additional left-turn lane(i e,create a double --.. Walnut onto FM 518 left)for the eastbound,northbound, and southbound �� approaches - -,, 19 Sherwood. • Add right-only lanes for the southbound approach This is an"offset T-intersection" The south leg is Sherwood and the north leg is a driveway that serves a Hollywood Video and a Kroger These approaches are split-phased,which appears to be a necessary evil because of the offset Also,this intersection is significantly impacted bytrains that - Ex PO D IA"E5Also,there currentlyis apedestrianphase associated with both of the split phases g Y P — PROPOSED s�,oRr RAKE IhBF+K3�£rE?+r � P pass through the grade crossing that's located one block to the —PROPOSE] HELIUM NaROE IrfR1sEr6ar west. Specifically,very long queues develop in both directions The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices defines eight signal warrants The full investigation of all of on FM 518 while a tram is blocking this crossing Then, once Exhibit 6 3-12 SH 35 Recommendation the warrants requires traffic volume data for eight-hours or more, only AM and PM peak hour volumes were collected for this project Nevertheless,the available data suggests the possibility that none of the warrants are met the tram is gone, it routinely takes multiple signal cycles for the 1 7 s intersection to recover to a normal condition It is recommended Short-Term Recommendations that logic be added to cause a special signal timing plan to 2 • Complete study to determine if this signal is warranted and remove it if current volumes do not meet one or operate once a train has cleared the crossing This plan would more of the warrants provide extended green times for the east-west movements Also,the number of cycles that the special plan would remain in 1 If the signal is retained,the following actions are recommended• effect would be a function of amount of time that the crossing __ ,-/ _ had been blocked by the train `^ FTI ate ■ As an intenm improvement,to eliminate the possibility of a pedestrian service having to be timed for both --- �, `' side street phases,the skewed crosswalk on the west side should be removed Also, signs should be installed 16. Galveston to mstruct pedestrians that all north-south crossings must be made on the east side No changes are recommended • In conjunction with the installation of a raised median along FM 518,the possibility of relocating the north 17 Old Alvin leg of this signal should be investigated If the north leg of this offset T-intersection were moved to a The westbound right turn volumes are high,315 VPH during the driveway that's about 220-feet farther to the west,both legs of the offset"T"could be served concurrently, AM dunng and 266 VPH the PMpeak ---- ExIsr1►,c LANES peak — PROPOSED stir RAKE IE MEN r thereby reducing the red time for FM 518 At the west leg of the"T,"the accompanying median design PRo'O8 D eEollM RAVE I FRAME MEN should provide for an eastbound left turn but should prevent a westbound left turn Conversely, at the east leg Short-Term Recommendations of the"T,"the accompanying median design should provide for a westbound left turn but should prevent an Add a westbound right turn lane Exhibit 6 3-13 Old Alvin Recommendation eastbound left turn. 20 Westminster 18 Walnut/Barry Rose This intersection is currently split-phased The south leg,which has very low volumes,has just a single lane The This intersection has highly unusual geometry The nominally east-west major street,FM 518, is actually in a west- north leg,which has slightly higher volumes, has two approach lanes, designated as left-or-straight and straight-or- northwest to east-southeast orientation The Walnut approach is essentially eastbound and the Barry Rose approach right Although the south leg does not align directly with the north leg,their orientation is such that left-turning is essentially southwest-bound The Walnut and Barry Rose legs are appropriately split-phased since concurrent drivers from either side will have clear view of opposing traffic operation would probably be unsafe because of the angles Chapter 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor Im•rovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan run Cur andAssacraley-Horntes,lnc 3l G'\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Drafl Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan 11DEIC Short-Term Recommendations 23. Yost. Serve all north-south traffic on a single phase,with the left turns being made on a permitted basis This modification A forthcoming City of Pearland project will realign Yost and Shadycrest as a cross intersection This improvement is will allow the north-south traffic to be served during less total time,thereby lessening the red time for FM 518 considered a short range option in which along with the realignment of Yost to Shadycrest the signal that currently exists at Yost would be moved to the newly formed intersection In addition,the median configuration along this 21. Pearland Parkway 21 section of roadway would also be reconfigured All four approaches of this intersection currently have three lanes, designated as left-only, straight-only, and straight-or-right 24 Woodcreek At the current time,volumes are such at the LOS is B during the No changes are recommended. AM and PM peaks Based on the City and regional thoroughfare plans,traffic on Pearland Parkway will most likely increase 25 Wal-Mart:III substantially in the future. a ; i -- No changes are recommended r q -, _ ... Pm 619 Short-Term Recommendations , s 26 Dixie Farm Provide for auxiliary lanes when conditions warrant Based on =-a ; ; ; Dixie Farm currently has just one-lane per direction plus left-only and right-only auxiliary lanes at the FM 518 current volumes,the greatest benefit would be produced by intersection. The FM 518 approaches currently have three lanes, introducing. I 1 t designated as left-only, straight-only,and straight-or-right With this geometry,the intersection operates at LOS of F during 26 i • Eastbound right-turn only lane the AM and PM peaks • Westbound right-turn only lane • Northbound dual left,through and through right -- PROrwr _— o � RANGE I rrEHENr Dixie Farm is currently programmed for widening to four-lanes —PROPOSED rfo[UH ReHOE t HPAOrsrear However,without auxiliary lanes(i e with all approaches /- designated as left-only, straight-only,and straight-or-right), , I --- 22 Liberty/Country Club. Exhibit 6 3-14 Pearland Parkway Recommendation the FM 518/Dixie Farm intersection will still be at LOS of E I I I _= ya I` ` l ' i This intersection is currently split-phased for the north-south during the AM and PM peaks FH 71 S movements The northbound and southbound approaches each have two lanes, designated as left-or-straight and right-only Medium-Term Recommendations _- ; . ; The northbound and southbound right turn volumes are both 22 ! The greatest benefit would result from adding the following ---' , relatively heavy— 178 and 139 VPH respectively during the I lanes,which would provide LOS of C during the AM peak AM peak t and PM peak Short-Term Recommendations `1 L • A second eastbound left-turn lane • Add eastbound right-turn lane ■ A right-only lane for westbound -—- DIE STING LANES I - PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IMPROVEMENT • Re-stnpe northbound and southbound approaches I __- ■ A second westbound left-turn lane —PROPOSEDHEDI uM RANCE IHPROYEi.€Hr to have a dedicated left and a share right-though y ' FM eta ■ A right-only lane for eastbound • Remove split-phase signal timing. ___, i 7 . Exhibit 6 3-16 Dixie Farm Recommendation ---> li I 26a Pine Hollow - - —0, *1 r TxDOT recently completed a signal warrant study for this T-intersection,which indicated the need for a signal In coordination with the installation of this signal the study team recommends consolidating a number of dnveways Medium-Term Recommendations. "1 1 ( so that a proper intersection may be formed with Pine Hollow • Add one-lane on the northbound and southbound ___ EMU(NO LANES approaches and stripe to provide a left-only lane,a — PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IMPROVEMENT straight-only lane,and a right-only lane -PraoPo> n MEDIUM RANGE taare►Er,r • With these changes,the north-south movements can Exhibit 6 3 15 Liberty/Country Club have a quad-left sequence with protected-permitted lefts Recommendation Also,right-turn overlap phases can be provided ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 32 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan ADAC 27 Winding 33 Whispering Pines This intersection has a single-lane approach for both directions on the minor street and all minor street traffic operates The northeast-bound approach is the driveway of an on a single phase. However,the current LOS is B for the AM and PM peaks and no improvements are recommended office complex. Currently, FM 518's northwest-bound 7 approach does not have a left-turn bay. 28 FM 2351 /Edgewood At the present time,the southeast-bound,northwest-bound, and southwest-bound approaches have three-lanes, Short-Term Recommendations g designated as left-only, straight-only,and straight-or-right Southwest of FM 518, FM 2351 transitions to one-lane • Add a northwest bound left-turn lane � e per direction plus a TWLTL About 500-feet in advance of FM 518,a second northbound lane develops(and the .r, � TWLTL becomes a northbound left turn lane) There are no right-turn lanes at the present time With existing Also, Whispering Pines/Friendswood Link Road will `s;F- geometry,this intersection has a LOS of D during the AM and PM peaks be redeveloped from FM 518 to the corporate city limits 3 just east of Blackhawk. This project is in expectation of ' This segment of FM 518 is within the City of Friendswood's 28 Harris County's plans to extend El Dorado west from IH- K`' �— '��` downtown overlay distnct,which is promoting pedestrian 45 and will provide Fnendswood with another access to ►' ,, ` friendliness Accordingly,any widening of FM 518 at this 1, the IH-45 corridor when complete. Friendswood Link intersection would probably not be in harmony with the City's 2'� will be widened into a four-lane curb and gutter roadway • r-''> adopted goals for the downtown area. On the other hand, �poP, and lowered to accept underground storm drainage The "i widening on FM 2351 would probably not be in conflict with s` total length of the project is approximately 1 13 miles. 44 the goals of the overlay distnct y� As a result, some traffic that now uses FM 2351 may !6 `} ''A instead use Whispering Pines EXISTING LANESThe following package of improvements will achieve LOS of %.„ �_`, — PROPOSED SHORT RANGE CFPRcNEFENT C during the PM peak and provide an improved operation 1 )i ` 34 Winding Way PROPOSEDrED[UM RANGE I P4'RUY r T (though still LOS of D)during the AM peak. /`' No changes are recommended Short-Term Recommendations 35 FM 528/Parkwood Exhibit 6 3-17A Whispering Pines Recommendation • Provide a right-turn only lane on the southwest-bound s'& FM 528 has a seven-lane undivided section. approach on FM 2351 Additionally,there is a bike lane in each direction 3 5 --- EXIS11NG LANES — PROPOSED SHORT RANGE I FPRovEFEN1" FM 518 has a five-lane undivided section west of the Medium-Term Recommendations — PROPOSED FEDI U1 RANGE (M5ROVEFENT intersection and a four-lane divided section east of the • Provide dual left-turn lanes for both directions on FM intersection. In the southeast-bound direction, FM 518 0," 2351 (Edgewood) Exhibit 6 3-17 FM 2351 Edgewood Recommendation already has a right-turn lane With existing geometry, ti `" this intersection has a LOS of D during the AM and `-tea 29 ShadowBend. PM peaks <A;, e No changes are recommended y( Short-Term Recommendations , :, A 30 Spreading Oaks • Add one-lane in the southwest bound approach A I. ' --\�'‘ No changes are recommended to create a dual left f to t 31 Clearview Medium-Term Recommendations , No changes are recommended • Add one-lane in the northeast bound approach to r create a dual left �, 32. Castlewood. • Add one-lane in the southwest bound approach & No changes are recommended to create a dedicated right-only lane. ---- ExISr[NG LANES �- PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IMPROVEMENT -PROPOSED MEDIUM RANGE [PPROVEIENT Exhibit 6 3-18 FM 528/Parkwood Recommendations Chapter 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor Improvements Draft Access Corridor Plan 1E1EI 1 ernid At oae�Inc. G\TPTO35917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report 33 \6 Copyright 0 2004 Kimrey-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss Management Plan 113)0 36 Bay Area Boulevard 38 Landing Boulevard With existing volumes and geometry,this intersection has a 3 6 wi This intersection has protected-permitted lefts eastbound and 3 8 PM peak LOS of C However,the westbound right turn $ westbound With existing volumes and geometry,this g volume of 206 VPH is high enough to warrant the addition % intersection currently operates at LOS of A during the AM and of a separate right-turn lane PM peaks However,the westbound left-turn volume—228 VPH during the PM peak—is sufficiently high to warrant -__ Short-Term Recommendations. 1 , =--- planning for the future provision of a dual left-turn i , rf� ■ Add one-lane on the westbound approach to provide ,' v � + FN ete fr 1,' y Y I FIA eta for a dedicated right-turn lane. Medium-Term Recommendations. =-y tti A, ) ■ Add westbound left-turn lane - t xA l I I 0 11 r Q 1 I I Lai CO CO Existing Linea Propoee4 Snort Rape Ivprovement EXISTING LANES Proposed MaUium Rape Improvement PROPOSED SNORT RANG IFPR4v£HENT PROPOSED F£DIuM RANGE IMPROv£MENr Exhibit 6 3-21 Landing Boulevard Recommendation Exhibit 6 3-19 Bay Area Boulevard 39 Williamsport Boulevard/Newport Boulevard This is an offset T-intersection,the two legs of which are about 230-feet apart The west leg(Williamsport)has a 37. Spring Landing/Palommo driveway on the opposite(south) side There is no driveway opposite Newport A protected-permitted left-turn phase This intersection,which currently operates at LOS of B 3 7 a is provided for the left turn from FM 518 into each street during the AM and PM peaks, has a single phase for the o However,the westbound left into the driveway is permitted cross street Also, each cross street approach has two- only. The legs of the"T"are far enough apart that both can be 4 1 r lanes(designated as left-or-straight and straight-or-right) served concurrently,thereby minimizing red time for FM 518 AIN, This intersection currently operates at LOS of A during the � A new high school is planned for a tract north of FM 518 , , �___ AM and PM peaks and no changes are recommended J on the west side of Palomino Since the southbound left- turn(from Palommo to go east on FM 518)is already `' °j r FM eis 40. Newport .) ;ram 2— fairly heavy— 162 VPH during the AM peak—the =__` `t A"a No changes are recommended FM 518 geometry of the intersection should be improved prior to ---- , , ---- , the opening of the new school To facilitate the use of a 41 Hobbs/Lafayette quad-left signal sequence, a left-turn bay should be I 1 ( The north leg(Lafayette)provides access to the Clear Creek provided for the northbound and southbound approaches Village neighborhood The south leg(Hobbs Road)provides access to an even larger residential area while also providing l Short-Term Recommendations access to the rear of commercial area that fronts onto IH-45 • --- ExISTENG LANES Add one-lane to the northbound approach to ExrsTrrac LANES PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IMPRBVEMEN1- provide for a dedicated right-turn lane, and stripe PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IPPROVE)ENr The northbound and southbound approaches,which are split- —PROPOSED NED EOM RANGE 1MROVEMENr lanes to for a left-only, straight-only, and right- -PROPOSED rEnru„RANGE e1PR0 tEmENT phased, currently have two lanes,designated as left-or-straight only and right-only. South of the Intersection,Hobbs has one • Re-stripe southbound lanes to provide for a left- Exhibit 6 3-20 Spring Landing/ Palomino traffic lane per direction plus one bike lane per direction(see Exhibit 6 3-22. Hobbs/ Lafayette Recommendation only lane and shared through-right lane Recommendation Exhibit 6 3-22) Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 34 "ADAC Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Medium-Term Recommendations With existing volumes and geometry,this intersection operates at LOS of D during the AM and PM peaks However, • Add eastbound dual right—begin dual right as an additional auxiliary lane the westbound left-turn volume of 377 VPH is sufficiently high to justify the provision of a dual left-turn. However, • Add eastbound dual left doing this would also necessitate the widening of at least a short segment of Hobbs Further Explanation of the Recommended Improvements Short-Term Recommendations Between the Hobbs intersection and the IH-45 east frontage road intersection, FM 518 should be widened by one- • Add westbound left-turn lane(dual) lane A transition would occur at the midpoint between Hobbs and the west frontage road From the transition to • Add northbound right-turn lane(dual) Hobbs,the additional lane will be a second westbound left-turn lane at Hobbs From the transition to the east,the • Provide two southbound through lanes additional lane will be a second left-turn lane for turns from eastbound FM 518 onto the northbound IH-45 frontage road. This additional lane will develop about halfway between Hobbs/Lafayette and the west(southbound)frontage The above improvements to the Hobbs/Lafayette intersection should be implemented in conjunction with the road , recommended improvements for the FM 518/IH-45 interchange(see Exhibits 6.3-23 and 6.3.24) Below is a further explanation of the short-term recommendations The southbound frontage road should be • A double left-turn should be provided for the westbound left-turn widened by one-lane to provide two • In order to be able to receive two-lanes turning left from westbound FM 518, Hobbs should be widened to dedicated lanes for the southbound-to 'I v r ji - provide two southbound lanes for at least 200-feet(see Exhibit 6.3-22) At that point,a taper would begin westbound left-turn There are currently _ ONLY ONLY into the existing cross section two right-turn lanes at the intersection I„ • Using what appears to be existing ROW,the Hobbs approach should be widened on the right to provide a itself,but(as shown in Exhibit 6.3-25) 4 4 1.59' a ipirp total of three approach lanes They should be designated as one left-or-straight lane and two right-only lanes. the left of these two-lanes has restricted , ' _ ' '" r ■ Even though split-phasingwill continue to be the most appropriate to accommodate the vehicular capacity because it diverges from a left- `r , ,, ►r,- gway � -�3�: . ate: or-straight lanejust 130-feet from the _ �. :_ r movements,the north-south pedestrian crossings should be restricted to just one side of the intersection g fi stopline The current lane configuration Normally,this would be the side associated with higher vehicular volume(i e the northbound direction) g =-- ,.- -+ ,� --- is depicted in Exhibit 6.3-23 and 6.3-24 � ' In this case,because of the recommended double right-turn for the northbound direction,the north-south P - pedestrian crossing should be on the west side associated with the southbound phase ,briv�Y 4 42 and 43 IH-45 West Side and IH-45 East Side. This interchange currently uses the TTI 4-phase signal .-.,..,...,.,...a.,».,..,.....,0DO~.1 Exhibit 6 3-25 Existing Southbound Approach on IH-45 at FM 518 4 3 ..�.o.�.,.o .@ sequence,which is 4 2 ri the standard for """"'"`°"""""' The recommended widening is depicted in Exhibits 6.3-23 and 6.3-24. In the case of FM 518 west of the frontage diamond )) 1(^ road,the widening should be on the north side Between the frontage roads,the widening should transition such that it interchange signals will almost entirely on the south at and east of the east frontage road As depicted in Exhibit 6.3-26,this will avoid an in the greater ; ; ; ____ existing building on the south side between IH-45 and Hobbs. Also,as depicted in Exhibit 6.3-27,on the north side Houston area �'.� �; �N,6t� 1 I. v`. r� PN, St 6 just west of the east frontage road,this will avoid an existing TxDOT communications cabinet and the existing signal ___s •'1 4 i controller cabinet(which is immediately to the west of the communications cabinet) On the south side between IH- During the AM ___ __y 45 and Hobbs,this will avoid an existing building(Exhibit 6.3-25) peak,the heaviest movements are On both sides, as can be seen in Exhibits 6.3-26 and 6.3-27,the distance between the existing curb and the bridge toward the north on piers is approximately 18-feet Therefore,the proposed transition can be accommodated while still leaving adequate IH-45 with 645 I width on each side for pedestrian passage VPH coming from ___ EXISTING LANE! ---- EXISTING LANES the west and 856 —PROPOSED SNORT RANGE IIYROVENfNT - PROPOSED SinRT RANGE INPROVE€£Nf -PROPOSED tEDIUM RANGE IPROVEt£NT -PROPOSED PEOI um RANGE INFRDY.E►ENT VPH from the east During the PM peak,the heaviest Exhibit 6 3-23 IH-45 South Bound Exhibit 6 3-24 IH-45 North Bound movements are from the north on IH-45 — 1,021 VPH turn left to go east on FM 518 and 659 turn right to go west on FM 518 Another 496 VPH come from the south on FM 518 and turn left to go west on FM 518. ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovemEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Er Ken y-Horn z and Assoc ates,Inc. 35 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Pian\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 K,mley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan tilDIC 44 Calder/Devereux 4 5 ileriull"Plt5 . No changes are recommended ti 45 Interurban• This intersection has protected-permitted lefts for both directions on FM 518 and the north-south • movements are split-phased The north leg is a ._- ' .1 (f�. _-,, - •!-- driveway which unfortunately is offset about 40-feet FM 51 e 7"---* �'� to the east of the south leg,which is Interurban, _, a — _�'�` ` ,�. (a public street) Unfortunately,the push-button 4 - __ _ actuated north-south pedestrian intervals are --_-_- el associated with the very low-volume southbound '` lir vehicular phase rather than the northbound vehicular . 4r gumumrim.A1111•1,.-_ phase )1 4 By acquiring a corner clip on the southeast corner, _______....kk� Interurban can be made to line up with the driveway. In conjunction with this,the northbound approach --- EX;5T i n4 L4n69 currentlyhas a single can be widened Froposea srxrt Range Irtprovement Exhibit 6 3-26 South Side of FM 518 Looking West through IH-45 (whichlane) ___ (showing building close to ROW) to provide a left-turn bay plus a straight-or-right Proposed M9a wit Range Improvement lane The major benefit of doing this is that all north-south traffic could then operate on a single Exhibit 6 3-28 Interurban Recommendations phase,thereby reducing the red time for FM 518 Medium-Term Recommendation. • Add one northbound left-turn lane 4 6 .._ :7 _ , 46 SH3 4: 3 �, �� ,5 This major intersection has protected-only lefts for : 1 agi.i. ' .—- f E+ all approaches West of the intersection,FM 518 v ., v `Y� �_ .a /� has a five-lane section East of the intersection, - _F.•' FM 518 quickly transitions into afour-lane , , , , Y `— " —, _ r undivided section and the length of the westbound .Y M v FM 510 left-turn bay is fairly short(probably 100 feet). North of the intersection, SH 3 is six-lane divided ^J ''- " is,-,4 South of the intersection, SH 3 has a seven-lane -__-- section. — =, With the timing optimized for existing volumes 11 and geometries,this intersection operates at LOS .1 �3 , of E during the AM peak and LOS of F during the PM peak. Based on volumes, it would be highly desirable to have double left-turns for all four - Proposed Sanes Exhibit 6 3-27. North Side of FM 518 at IH-45 (showing the existing Proposed snow Range Improvement TxDOT communications cabinet) approaches However,due to ROW constraints, Proposes medium Range Improvement this would be particularly difficult for the FM 518 approaches Exhibit 6 3-29 SH 3 Recommendations Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Im•rovEments Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 36 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan tlIDEIC ■ The lagging westbound left turn(from FM 2094)occurs at the east intersection, with the east-west through Medium-Term Recommendation movements continuing at the west intersection • Add dual left-turns for the northbound and southbound approaches • The double left turn from the"T"leg of FM 518 occurs,concurrently with the lagging westbound left • Add a right-only lane for the southbound approach. protected left turn at the west intersection ■ The split-phased FM 270 movement occurs at the west intersection, southbound followed by northbound 47 Houston. During these movements, only the nominally eastbound movement is green at the east intersection This is a two-phase intersection within the four-lane undivided segment of FM 518 With existing volumes and geometries,the LOS is A during the AM and PM peaks and no changes are recommended As further discussed below,the two-lane segment of FM 518 east of FM 2094 will soon be widened As an interim improvement,the existing pavement should be re-striped to provide additional storage length for double left-turn 48 Park: (from westbound FM 518 toward the FM 270 intersection) Otherwise,considering the extremely heavy traffic This is also a two-phase intersection within the four-lane undivided segment of FM 518 With existing volumes and volumes,the existing traffic signal sequence appears to work quite well and no other low-cost,quick-to-implement geometries,the LOS is A during the AM and PM peaks and no changes are recommended improvements were identified. 49 Iowa. Short-Term Recommendations No changes are recommended 50 ■ Re-stripe northeast bound left-turn lane to provide additional storage — 50 Texas 51 & 51 b This is a T-intersection Both FM 518 approaches Other roadway improvements now being I j[J have two lanes and the westbound approach also has planned by the City of League City will provide + �� a left-turn bay and a protected-only left turn The FM 51 S an alternate route for some of traffic that now northbound approach has a single-lane. With ,, t, uses these intersections North and east of these o existing volumes and geometries,the LOS is A ---,_ I intersections, a generally east-west roadway will during the AM and PM peak and no short-term be built to connect FM 270 with FM 2094 improvements are recommended It Also,to the east,Louisiana Street will be ��__- extended northward, providing a connection i : ;' Medium-Term Recommendation Q between FM 518 and FM 2094 However, '- +y`++ yr- FM 2094 • Add an additional lane to the northbound u because of the circuitousness of travel,these approach and designate left-only, left- improvements may not substantially reduce the ----} � 4 ?�' y T ; ; straight,or right traffic through these intersections --�i I ; ; + tonne,,,, Citii noir IMS 51a and 51b FM 270/FM 2094 Accordingly,the improvement depicted in �> These two intersections are approximately 320-feet _ Exhibit 6.3-31 is suggested as a means of anes apart and are currentlyoperated bythe same signal -- Existing T p p Proposed Short Range improvement substantially increasing capacity, especially for controller The FM 270 intersection has protected- Preposea Med i ern Rongs I rcprovernent the movements between the nominally north leg Ex i s t i nq Lanes ,cp only left turns in all four directions The FM 270 of FM 270 and FM 2094 and the nommally east Prapasea Snort Range Improvement movements(nominally north-south)are split-phased leg of FM 518 This alternative can be Propaeea Long Range Improvement and the very heavy southbound left-turn has two- Exhibit 6 3-30' Texas Recommendations summarized as follows lanes. The FM 2094 intersection is a"T"at which the nominally west leg of FM 518 aligns with FM 2094 The other leg of FM 518 comprises the stem of the"T" Exhibit 6 3-31 FM 270/ FM 2094 Recommendations The existing signal sequence is as follows Medium-Term Recommendations • The leading eastbound protected left-turn at the west intersection begins concurrently with the eastbound and • A"bypass"would be constructed through currently vacant property to connect the FM 518/FM 2094 westbound through movements at the east intersection intersection. As depicted in greater detail in Appendix B,the intersection of this bypass and FM 270 would • The westbound movement begins at the west intersection,with the other east-west through movements also be signalized However,by widening the existing bridge by one lane,the heavy eastbound-to- continuing at both intersections northbound movement would be a"free"movement that would merge from two-lanes into one a few hundred feet beyond the bridge ChaptEr 6 Short and Medium-TErm Corridor ImprovEments Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Cron rind Msodate inc. 3 7 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc tIDIC Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan 6.4 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ■ With respect to overall capacity,the major(and significant)advantage of this bypass is that the very heavy southbound-to-eastbound left-turn(which has a volume of over 850 VPH during the PM peak) is completely removed from the FM 518/FM 270 intersection Instead,this traffic will first turn left at the"new" Safety improvements include the addition of several new raised medians and potential locations for driveway intersection and then either turn left again(if going to FM 2094)or continue straight through(if going the east consolidation The following exhibit presents raised medians and opening information to and from major cross leg of FM 518)at the second intersection(FM 518/FM 2094) In either case,this traffic will be moving streets In addition, aerials graphics have been developed to graphically represent the recommended median through the FM 518/FM 2094 intersection at the same time both the northbound and southbound FM 270 improvements traffic is moving through the FM 518/FM 270 intersection. As shown in the following table,this bypass would enable this complex of intersections to operate at substantially Median Improvements short signal cycles,thereby resulting in substantial reductions in delay The application of a raised median in the corridor has been a major focus of discussion with business leaders,public officials, and land developers. The discussion began with adding a raised median throughout the entire FM 518 Comparison of MOEs corridor After further discussion, it was determined that a raised median would best be applied only at intersections With and Without Bypass Alternative for FM 518 at SH 270 / FM 2994 that are experiencing a high level of crashes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without With % Without With % Exhibit 6.4-1 illustrates how a raised median will prohibit left turns into and out of dnveways that maybe located too MOE Unit Bypass Bypass Change Bypass Bypass Change close to the functional area of the mtersection. The raised median will typically begin on both sides of the intersection Signal Cycle Length Seconds 180 112 37 8% 180 94 -47 8% and continue for approximately 600-feet in both directions, see Exhibit 6.4-2.Also,Exhibit 6.4-3 demonstrates a typical cross section for the median Signal Delay/Vehicle Seconds/Vehicle 42 16 -61 9% 37 14 -62 2% Total Signal Delay Vehicle-Hours 132 56 -57 6% 126 51 -59 5% Average Stops/Vehicle Stops/Vehicle 0 66 0 50 -24 2% 0 54 0 52 -3 7% Total Vehicle-Stops Vehicle-Stops 7,444 6,100 -18 1% 6,605 6,809 3 1% Average Speed MPH 11 19 72 7% 12 21 75 0% Total Travel Time Vehicle-Hours 180 111 -38 3% 185 113 -38 9% Distance Traveled Vehicle-Miles 1,942 2,068 6 5% 2,302 2,381 3 4% J Ei Table 6 3-2 Comparison of MOEs Ni ' % liummiimelw CIO 52 through 59. Clear Creek High School to SH 146• u11D m TxDOT will soon be widening this segment to provide two through lanes per direction No changes are recommended However,the study team does want to recognize the need for a traffic signal warrant study to be performed on the western most driveway entering the Wal-Mart 1 .. Exhibit 6 4-1 Medians Protect the Functional Intersection Area Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 38 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access ManagEmEnt Plan I'M Below is a description of the methodology used to determine where the raised medians would be most effective Short-Term Raised Median Recommendations The study team identified areas where turning traffic, both at the street intersection and at commercial driveways located within the functional area of the intersection, were the major reasons for high crash rates. By analyzing the incidents of crashes surrounding each signalized and un-signalized intersection in the corridor the study team was able L, - ,- l°- ' to prioritize the application of raised medians , - f - Characteristics of a potential short-term raised median recommendation include. 1 1 I I _- - - ( 1 I- 1 I it i—III I — i 1 I-11 11 I 11 I I I i- 114�n— HI I_I 1 I 1 I I=i ,---- II 1-1- , -i 1 i 1 -- —III III"-1 l I III=I I( III=' 111E1 117- i 1-111 IT1�-1'F-111-11—III III-11! I' ■ Intersection with a high crash rate(>10) 'E11 i( 111-11 IEI 1 ET 1 E11 l 111E 1 i 11 h 11 111 - _ 1 i 1=1 I I 1 11E1Ha 11-11 I 111-1 I I 111E11 I 11 I_ 41-111 1 I! !1±--,_- 11.11 r !t_111 1 ul 11- , 11�1-11 111:-111 11=111 11=111-11 111 111=11 • Adjacent land use has good alternative access ways(driveway on cross street) ■ Adjacent land use has adequate internal circulation • The addition of the raised median has limited safety benefits, but does contribute aesthetically to a gateway feature Exhibit 6 4-3 Proposed FM 518 Median The short-term raised medians will be implemented in the next one to two years The Table 6 4-1 indicates the recommended median locations and Appendix A depicts these locations on maps. Intersection # Map# Location Adjacent Land Use Total Alternative IInternal Crashes Access Circulation Pearland 2 1 West of SH 288 Intersection to Silver Lake Aesthetic gateway feature _ Drive 3,4 1,2 Silver Lake Village Drive/Wal-Mart Yes Yes 36 GOO FT MAX. i 6 2 Miller Ranch CR 93 Yes Yes 15 TURN LANE _7 3 Southwick Road Yes Yes 13 / BRICK BANDING LOW SHRUB 9 5 Cullen Road to Old Chocolate Bayou Yes Yes 21 ` 10 6 _Manvel Road (FM 1128) Yes Yes 36 r-1 11 8 Harkey/Oday Yes Yes 25 — 11 a 9 Hatfield Yes Yes 10 NI ,-\ .� _• e st 12 9 Woody/Corrigan Yes Yes 13 cs„_,_ 13 9 McLean / Halbert Yes Yes 16 N I I N 14 10 Mykawa Yes Yes 11 '-� / / 26 16 Dixie Farm Yes Yes 17 24' AIDE ISLAND NOSE CANOPY TREES Friendswood WITH BRICK PAVERS 35 23 Parkwood FM 528 Yes Yes 23 Exhibit 6 4-2 Proposed Median Plan 36 28 Brookdale/ Bay Area Boulevard Partly Yes 16 41 and 42 32 Royal— Hobbs/ Lafayette to West of IH-45 Partly Partly , 44 43 and 43a 32 East of IH-45 to 400 feet East of Wesley Partly Partly 46 43a 33 Highland Drive Yes Yes 9 44 33 Devereux/Calder to Englewood Yes Yes 28 45 33 Interurban Yes Yes 23 Table 6.4-1. Short-Term Raised Median Improvements ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-Term Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑mn and IGmiey-Horn te Associa es,inc. 3 9 G-\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management PIan\Draft Report Copyright 0200a Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc IVOHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss Management Plan Medium-Term Raised Median Recommendations Long-Term Raised Median Recommendations. The second round of raised median improvements are typically related to traffic operations and safety concerns at The final set of improvements is limited to areas where development patterns restrict the application of a raised intersections These intersections have a less severe safety problem than those in the short-term median,traffic operation, and safety levels are satisfactory and/or adjacent land is undeveloped Therefore,the raised median recommendations are limited to use as a long-range planning tool During retrofit and/or development of Characteristics of a potential medium-term raised median recommendation include. sites this plan should be referenced Access points to developments should be determined based upon the location of • Intersection with a high crash rate(>5) median openings depicted on the maps in Appendix A.Most of these median openings in undeveloped areas are • Adjacent land use has alternative access ways(multiple driveways) placed on shared property lines In developed areas the median openings are based upon providing adequate stopping • Adjacent land use has opportunity to share access with another development sight distances and generating shared access locations Medium term raised median improvements will be implemented as funding becomes available The Table 6.4-2 Characteristics of a potential phase three raised median location indicates the potential locations and Appendix A depicts these locations on maps. • Locations with little to no crash experience • Adjacent land use has access only from FM 518 • Adjacent land use has shallow lot sizes, strip-centers, and/or no internal circulation Intersection Map# Location Adjacent Land Use Total Driveway Improvements # Alternative Internal Crashes Access Circulation As noted in Chapter 5,Improvement Options,driveway consolidation is an access management technique that Pearland can greatly improve the overall corridor safety and operations Aenal graphics in Appendix A represents potential 10a 7 East of Roy Street No No 10 driveway consolidation candidates that the implementing agencies can consider for driveway consolidation 10b 7 Garden Road No No 10 The timing and implementation of these consolidations can 14a 10 East of Pearland Drive to West of No No 26 be paired with several of the improvement options presented Driveway consolidation recommendations Texas Drive in this chapter. For instance, if a right-turn lane is being • Pearland— 103 16 10 Galveston No No 11 considered at a particular location then an opportunity for • Friendswood—31 17 11 Old Alvin Partly Partly 14 driveway consolidation might be appropriate Also, if a • League City—23 18 12 Barry Rose Partly Partly 7 sidewalk addition is being considered there may be an • Kemah—0 20 12 Westminster Partly Partly 13 opportunity to discuss driveway access and possible • Total— 157 21 13 Pearland Parkway Yes Yes 8 consolidation In addition,as development or 22 13,14 Liberty Drive No No 31 redevelopment occurs the location and design of all When to consider consolidating 23 14 Yost/ Shadycrest Partly Partly 14 driveways should be re-evaluated Finally, in areas where • 24 15 Woodcreek Yes Yes 7 Addition of right turn lane —. a raised median is limiting the left-turn maneuver from a • Redevelopment of property Friendswood private drive then some discussion about relocation or • Sidewalk drainage and sewer projects 43a 124 - 27 I Lakeview to Eastern City Limit I Aesthetic Gateway Feature - closing and encouraging shared or cross access might be League City appropriate - 27 Western City Limit _ Aesthetic Gateway Feature - 38 31 Landing Boulevard Yes I Yes 5 Table 6 4-2 Medium-Term Raised Median Improvements ChaptEr 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor ImprovemEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 40 ilaCHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Other Safety Improvements Landscape,commercial signage, and general aesthetics The ability of persons(vehicles,pedestrians,and bicyclist)to safely maneuver through intersections and other In conjunction with access management improvements such as consolidating driveways, installing raised medians, merging sections of FM 518 will be greatlyimproved bythe modification of signage and li lighting alongthe roadwayor adding auxiliary lanes, many aesthetic treatments are possible. These include g g Pg g Signage • landscaping the raised median Providing sufficient time to allow motorists to make appropriate turning movements when approaching cross streets • adding pavement textures and designs to parking areas can improve safety and reduce congestion Street-name and number signs placed overhead, give drivers more time to ■ adding well designed retaining walls where needed to prevent erosion make decisions about where to turn This translates into a significant benefits in term of vehicle stops,traffic delay, • planting street trees and other vegetation outside the clear zone and crash incidents The following recommendations should be undertaken in the short-term • removing signs from the clear zone and otherwise modifying commercial signs to make them less obtrusive ■ adding uniform,well designed street lights and other hardware 1 The use of overhead-mounted street-name signs with street block information is recommended at all major • placing utility lines underground to eliminate them from view and reduce the need for utility poles intersections in the FM 518 corridor Such aesthetic treatments can,when combined with access management, create a much more attractive roadway corridor that is also highly functional and safer See top picture for an example of a roadway that has not been well 300[ 30FV 5 1 8 managed. When access management is applied,aesthetic considerations are improved Exhibit 6 4-3 Overhead mounted street name sign 2. The MUTCD(1988)states that the lettering on street-name signs should be at least 100-millimeters (four-inches)high. To accommodate the elderly population along FM 518, a minimum letter height of 150-millimeters(six-inches)should be considered for use on post-mounted street-name signs. 3 The use of redundant street-name signing for major intersections is recommended,with an advance street- name sign placed before the intersection at a midblock location along with overhead-mounted street-name sign posted at the intersection Wherever practical,the midblock sign should be mounted overhead Following these recommendations throughout the entire corridor across political jurisdictions,will provide for an orderly, predictable picture to the corndor's tourist,business people,and residents Lighting One of the main purposes of lighting a roadway at night is to increase the visibility of the roadway and its immediate environment,thereby permitting the driver to maneuver more safely and efficiently The link between reduced visibility and highway safety,though it may be difficult to quantify in a cost-benefit analysis, is conceptually straightforward Lighting allows drivers to make better decisions and reduces crashes overall Pedestrians and bicyclists will also benefit by the uniform addition of lighting in the corridor Wherever feasible,fixed lighting installations are recommended(a)where the potential for wrong-way movements is indicated through accident experience or engineering judgment, (b)where pedestrian volumes are high,or(c)where shifting lane alignment,turn-only lane assignment, or a pavement-width transition forces a path-following adjustment at or near the intersection Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑E11 ad ,nc. 41 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report C opyright O 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc til&C Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss ManagEmEnt Plan I. 1 i ` : I a1J- 1 • ,411111110111.111111111111.1111111111111111 Before signage and aesthetic improvements r ,� -aalY, • j, After signage and aesthetic improvements ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft AccEss Corridor Plan 42 Houston-Galveston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan 6.5 IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE Goals and Objectives As stated in Chapter 3, Cities Pearland Friendswood Lea ue CityKemah the corridor goals and objectives were used to y determine to overall = corridor need and provide c '1 T focus to the team The n=i C a) cn � can I- a goals of improve safety, a00o rn a) I a) Q, oNo �' .Ni o cn identify short-term Selected Signalized Crossroads * to n to to ;' to to o to . to 13 to - 41) to W to to = to to to to = transportation solutions, 0 3 CO 1- C) c N " 3 a C A improve traffic flow, Cl) g a e 3'z < co reduce motorist delay, and .< 5' °a 7. a co 0. assess long-term corridor S 5 needs provide the guiding ua principles for our _ - evaluation criteria Please Distance 2 3 2 2 1 8 1 5 2 9 1 2 1 8 2 0 2 6 0 8 1 2 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 1 refer to Chapter 3 for the Existing Driveways 37 81 104 97 119 59 83 28 53 46 72 89 32 20 26 methodology on the ,_ _ calculation for each Proposed Driveways 37 67 85 59 87 43 68 28 50 39 62 86 32 20 26 performance measure - - - Driveways Eliminated 0 14 19 38 32 16 15 0 3 7 10 3 0 0 0 Improve Safety Existing Driveways per Mile 16 37 59 65 41 48 45 14 21 59 62 60 23 15 24 The goal of improving , _ _ safety along the corridor Proposed Driveways per Mile 16 31 48 39 30 35 37 14 20 50 53 58 23 15 24 can best be measured in U) terms of the number of a) — " o conflict points and Q Driveway Density Ratio 0 53 1 24 1 96 2 16 1 38 1 60 1 50 0 47 0 69 1 97 2 07 1 99 0 77 0 51 0 79 driveway way density ratio - Table 6.5-1 illustrates how Proposed Driveway Density Ratio 0 53 1 03 1 60 1 31 1 01 1 17 1 23 0 47 0 65 1 67 1 78 1 92 0 77 0 51 0 79 the addition of raised medians and driveway Existing Conflict Points 896 1,342 1,696 1,536 1,936 442 894 496 880 736 1,184 1.456 496 304 416 consolidations can _ positively influence safety Proposed Conflict Points 228 292 440 200 416 340 682 314 384 190 226 666 244 178 136 Crashes Over Three Years 84 129 141 101 102 42 64 19 33 69 139 173 76 31 18 Proposed Conflict Point Crash 21 28 37 13 22 32 49 12 14 18 27 79 37 18 6 Reduction Table 6 5-1' Safety Improvements Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan EonCon K eyUorn ] and Associates,Inc. 43 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-Galveston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEment Plan t'M Exhibit 6.5-1 represents the existing conflict points throughout the corridor along with the crash data As you will It shows each intersection's LOS for three different scenarios: existing, future City and TxDOT improvements and the see there is a direct correlation between the conflict points and crash data Also, included is the conflict points based proposed improvements in place on the recommended median improvements You will notice how much reduction there is for potential conflicts and therefore the crash expectancy will be greatly reduced Also, notice that there are a few conflict areas that are on the Level of Service Center lower end of the curves these represent several different conditions For instance, in the west end of Pearland the City With has been doing a good job of controlling driveway access and therefore the conflicts are lower. Also, in Friendswood 2004 City and where a raised median exists the potential for conflicts is much lower Finally, in the eastern edge of League City and Intersection Existing TxDOT Proposed into Kemah this area is largely undeveloped and driveway density is low. This is planned for a four-lane highway ID Name with a raised median and will thereby result in a lower conflict potential Pearland 1 SH 288 West Side DDCDC C 2 SH 288 East Side CBB A B A 225 3 Silverlake Village A B A A A A 4 Wal-Mart C D C C 2000 5 CR 94/ Home Depot DDBCB C c 6 CR 93/ Miller Ranch B B B A E — 175 E 7 CR 90/Southwyck C B B B a, 0 8 FM 865/Cullen BBCCC C u) A- 4 N 9 CR 89/ Kroger DE A B A B N 1500 N 10 FM 1128 D D C C >, 125 c 11 Harkey/Oday C C C B Q a ra 12 Woody/Corrigan A A A A 13 Halbert/ McLean D F BCB C o. 1000 Q- 14 Mykawa B A B A .r — 75 d 15 SH 35/ Main E E D D o w 16 Galveston A A A A 4\1, 17 Old Alvin B C A B o 500 � -- 25 18 Walnut/ Berry Rose D F D F C D o Si } 19 Sherwood A A A B c 0 co M 20 Westminster B C A B 21 Pearland Parkway BCBCB B 0 1 I 1 1 i 1 I -25 22 Liberty DDDCB C Pearland Friendswood League City Kemah 23 Yost B A B A A B 24 Woodcreek A B A A 25 Wal-Mart at Dixie A B A A —Total Conflict Points —Proposed Conflict Points —Crash Data J 26 Dixie Farm F F EFC D 27 Sunset Meadows/Winding B B B B Exhibit 6 5-1 Conflict points and crashes Friendswood 28 FM 2351 / Edgewood E E D D IdentifyShort-Term Transportation Improvements 290 Shadow Bend B B A A p P 30 Spreading Oaks A B A A The previous section outlines all the short-term transportation solutions for the corridor both in terms of safety 31 Clearview A A A A and operations 32 Castlewood A B A A 33 Whispering Pines C D A A 34 Winding Way B B A A Improve Traffic Flow and Reduce Delay 35 FM 528/ Parkwood D D C C The operational improvements outlined above will translate into improved traffic flow and reduced motorist delay. The improvements can be measured in terms of the entire corridor and by intersection. Table 6.5-2 represents the Table 6 5-2 Intersection Improvements improved mobility that will be achieved once the recommended improvements are in place. Chapter 6 Short and Medium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 44 Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss Management Plan Level of Service Center AM CORRIDOR TRAVEL TIME DELAY PM CORRIDOR DELAY COMPARISON League City 36 Bay Area Boulevard C C C C 37 Sprmg Landing/ Palomino B B B B 38 Landing Boulevard A A A A 39 Williamsport A A A A • 40 Newport A A A A Y 41 Hobbs/ Lafayette D C B C 42 IH-45 West Side D E B C 43 IH-45 East Side B B_ B C 44 Calder/ Devereux A C A B IIIIII1.11 1 �■■■ 45 Interurban B C A C 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 25 50 75 tW ,25 150 ,)5 200 225 250 46 SH 3 E F D E Hours of Delay Hours of Delay 47 Houston A A A A •Existing Condition•Study Recommendations ■Existing Condition•Study Recommendations] 48 Park A _ A A A 49 Iowa A _ A A A Travel time delay is reduced by 100-hours in the Travel time delay is reduced by 30-hours in the 50 Texas A A C B AM peak PM peak 51 FM 270 E E D E 52 FM 2094 D D E D D C 53 Clear Creek High School C B A A A A 54 Meadow Parkway B B B _ A B A 55 South Shore B C A B B B Vehicle stops will be reduced by 20% during the 56 FM 1266/Columbia B B B B B A AM peak and 5% in the PM peak PM CORRIDOR TOTAL VEHICLE STOPS 57 Lawrence Road A A A A , 1 58 Kemah Oaks A A A A 1 59 SH146 B B B B I Table 6 5-2 Intersection Improvements, cont PM VEHICLE STOPS COMPARISON s 12500, 1 System Delay PM TRAVEL TIME DELAY 000e The following graphs represent the system delay - IIIIIIIIIIIIUUUI by City and for the entire corridor System delay 250 560 2n00 250D.0 3.4000 4500 5.0 5500.0 5500)� )500.0 e�9000 9500 '0022 Xours of Delay n is measured by the difference between the free 7500 LExlslfng Candilon■Study Rswmmmdalbnsi a, flow condition on a roadway and the congested mo condition The access management improvements ' ::: AM CORRIDOR TOTAL VEHICLE STOPS EAttjEaM k , 1 ; ,�el time 2500 -- 50 II _____.._ _.__________. Peadand Friendswood League City Kemah e u° ■Existing Condition■Study Recommendations Travel time delay benefits are 0 �_ a reflection of the operational Pearland Friendswood League City Kemah improvements made at 29 of Existing Condition•Study Recommendations 1 Vehicle stops are an indicator of traffic flow in ' ME 58 intersections in the corridor the corridor „°00 °y .Existing Condition■study Recommendation!j Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan C— IGmley-Ebro � and Associates,Inc. 45 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Komley-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan 113)10 Air Quality Results The access management treatments proposed for the FM 518 TDM strategies can augment the major north-south investment with access management strategies to improve traffic corridor will have a direct benefit to the regions air quality The flow and TDM programs to provide enhanced travel choices for east-west trips. TDM can also serve as a basis for benefits will come in the form of reduced criteria pollutants(NOx, Air Q u a I i ty building a transit market A number of TDM related programs are already active in the corridor VOCs, and CO),which are a direct result of improvements in vehicle travel time delay, speeds,and reduction of vehicle stops Simply, Benefits Vanpooling and Carpooling access management reduces unnecessary vehicle idling and allows Attracting passengers is the principle concern for vanpools Convincing employees to leave their cars at home, vehicles to drive at optimal speeds Pollutant % Reduced even a few days a week,means providing an alternative that is reasonably comfortable and convenient Perhaps most important, is developing an alternative that is also cheaper than driving Vanpools offer a uniquely cost-effective The air quality benefits of this project also broaden the potential NOx = 37% alternative by carrying six or more people Dividing commute costs between six people can result m significant funding mechanisms The measures taken to improve traffic flow savings The key ingredient,of course, is ensuring the sufficient number of vanpool participants and reduce delay in the corridor are eligible for Congestion VOC = 34% Mitigation and Air Quality(CMAQ)funding H-GAC prioritizes Partnerships enable successful vanpool programs.Forging partnerships between local employers,public agencies, these projects based upon daily emission reduction estimates CO = 36% and non-profit groups to market vanpool programs and creating public-private partnerships to facilitate ridematching and promotional efforts are both important components in developing a base of vanpool users Currently there 18-vanpools, coordinated through the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County vanpool program,these are detailed in Chapter 4.2. Vanpools are an attractive alternative to transit Vanpooling provides the convenience of door-to-door service and the cost-savings associated with splitting commute costs. 6.6 TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS Vanpooling strategies in the FM 518 corridor are two-prong Transit serves a very limited sector of the transportation market in the FM 518 corridor and short-term demographic trends do not indicate any major shifts in modal choice by the population.Nevertheless,there are things that can be 1 Vanpoolmg should be used for attracting new and retaining existing businesses in the comdor Employers done in the short-term to serve the transit market and improve mobility throughout the corridor The following can expand their labor market by coordinating vanpools for workers living in nearby towns recommendations build upon the initiatives defined in the Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority's METRO Solutions Plan, H-GAC's TDM,the Corridor guidebook, and the Regional Transportation Plan. • During negotiations with potential businesses along the corridor,consider reducing impact fees for companies that offer commuter benefits to their employees Companies that offer transportation allowances in the form of transit passes,vanpool subsidies,flexible work hours,and teleworking have Bus Service a higher rate of ridesharing,thus a lower impact on the surrounding transportation network As stated in Chapter 4.2,transit demand in the corridor is very low This is a function of automobile ownership, • METRO and H-GAC offer a$50 rider incentive and free guaranteed ride home for all vanpoolers in the urban design,and population and employment density. The current incapability of fixed route transit was eight-county area. This offer,or augment these benefits as part of an incentive package to attract new demonstrated with the stoppage of Connect Transit's fixed route service in Brazoria County,which operated Monday companies to the corridor • through Friday for 13-hours each day The service was provided for nine months operating from the northern end to Consider establishing a comdor wide guaranteed ride home program that is available to all carpoolers the southern end of Brazoria County(from Freeport to Pearland) While the service was well received and ridership and pedestrians/bicyclists • was steady, it did not appear the number of riders justified the cost of operating the service The combination of Host a ridesharing fair for area businesses to learn about the benefits of vanpooling and carpooling. limited fundmg sources and moderate patronage growth resulted in the cancellation of the fixed route service METRO conducts these for the entire region, scheduling may be done by calling 1-888-606-RIDE • A strong local ridership base currently continues to be an issue in justifying the development of fixed route service TDM friendly site design(see site design and facility improvements) along the FM 518 corridor Therefore,the study team recommends to strengthening the curb-to-curb service by 2. A home based vanpooling effort can be facilitated during the subdivision process and through existing making more busses available for the Connect Transit System and pursuing TDM measures along the FM 518 corridor neighborhood groups • Host a ridesharing fair for area neighborhood groups to learn about the benefits of carpooling and vanpooling TDM Support Strategies METRO conducts these for the entire region, scheduling may be done by calling 1-888-606-RIDE. • TDM friendly site design(see site design and facility improvements) The METRO Solutions Plan and Regional Transportation Plan calls for major investments in the IH-45 and SH 288 corridors over the next 10 to 25 years Enhanced travel choices may occur in the form of new general purpose lanes, managed lanes,HOV lanes,or high capacity rail transit in these corridors The study team looked at ways to provide enhanced travel choices for tnp patterns not well served by these major investments Chapter 6 Short and MEdium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft Access Corridor Plan 46 4310 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Park & Ride and Park & Pool Lots — Health Clubs A major constraint to the public's use of Park&Pool and Park&Ride lots in the corridor is the shear time it takes to — Cappuccino/Coffee Bars get to the lots from residential areas Implementation of the access management strategies in this plan should make the — Dry Cleaners travel times to these lots more manageable,therefore making carpooling and vanpoolmg a better option The study — Bookstores team recommends investigating the possibility of forming agreements with underutilized parking lots in the — Shoe Repair Shops — News and Magazine Stands communities to be used as Park&Pool lots • For smaller facilities,provide pedestrian linkages to nearby amenities Site Design and Facility Improvements Transportation Information Board or Kiosk • Provide transportation information on a bulletin board,display rack, or kiosk Include local bus and rail maps A variety of facility improvements can be pursued in the area to support the use of TDM The study team and schedules,carpool matching information, available vanpools to the area, and regional bike routes recommends the following considerations in all new developments. • Place the information m a high-traffic area such as a building lobby or cafeteria • For large facilities, consider a transportation office or commuter store that could provide direct assistance to Building Orientation commuters The center could be incorporated into the building management office or be staffed by a • Cluster buildings and avoid campus-type office development which discourages pedestrian and bicycles transportation management officer(TMO) travel. • Provide front door access by transit and pedestrians Subdivision Design Passenger Loading Areas • Designate secure areas where residents may Park&Pool Providing a transportation information board and • Offer a turn-out lane for passenger drop off in front of the building Be sure to provide adequate space for cars information about regional TDM programs will aid in the formation of carpools and vanpools so as to avoid a"lineup"that could block traffic during peak commute hours • Provide passenger shelters Parking Management Parking management includes three strategies. preferential parking,parking pricing, and the transportation allowance. Transit Access and Visibility • Establish during the plating of new developments where transit access will be granted and orient building Preferential Parking entrance toward public transportation facilities Preferential parking is a means of offering employees that carpool or vanpool a qualitative advantage over those that drive alone This strategy is one of the most common incentives offered by employers What makes the preferential Amount and Location of Parking arrangement desirable depends upon employees' interests Typically,this is done by reserving the spaces closest to • Explore opportunities for shared parking with neighboring facilities.Large ample parking areas can be the door for ndesharers,however, it can be any space or arrangement that the employee chooses as"preferred" an inefficient use of land Some employers will set aside 10%of all spaces for preferential use and restnpe the spaces Others prefer to make • Parking lots should be screened from adjacent sidewalks and streets by a wall,hedge,or berm the spaces available as demand increases. The recommended height for a wall is 30-to 36-inches • Consider charging for parking Where appropnate,paid parking can cut the number of people driving alone One challenge in administering a preferential parkingpro am is policing the use of the space.Many employers will by up to 20% require employees to register for the preferential spaces and be issued a hang tag. The tag is usually updated every three or six-months If a vehicle without a tag is parked in a preferential space,the vehicle is ticketed Garage Height Clearance for Van Vehicles • Adjust parking structure ceiling heights to allow for vanpool access The minimum ceiling height for vans is Parking Pricing eight-feet two-inches Charging for parking is a powerful tool in changing travel behavior The higher the price,the less likely a person will be to use or purchase the space However, employees often strongly resist any attempt to charge for parking Access to Services and Amenities and employers rarely want to risk damaging employee morale by dealing with the parking issue Many employees • For large facilities,create a"village"atmosphere where employees don't have to take their cars out during feel that free parking at the work place is a right and that any attempt to change that is tantamount to violating the the day Some amenities include. constitution Pricing may be especially difficult in some corridor given the moderate densities of development and — Restaurants - Convenience Stores lack of parking controls — Banks or ATMs Transportation Allowance — Child Care Facilities The concept of the transportation allowance has received increasing attention with employers, employees,city — Post Offices or Vending Machine planners and regulators as a means of balancing the costs of different travel options and promoting individual choice Chapter 6 Short and Medium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan GI_I \ Kinby+bin � , and Assocates,Inc. 47 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc tIMHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan The idea is that when we are allowed to choose how a subsidy is spent in helping us get to work,we may choose Section 5309 funds are authorized based on the results of alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering that something other than a parking space and dnving to work alone justify the project based on a variety of criteria Funds are allocated by statute as follows. An allowance is not a new concept It usually takes the form of a regular provision of money, food or other support • New rail starts and extensions(40%) provided by an organization or employer When applied to transportation, it is a tool offered by the employer to assist • Rail modernization(40%) their employees in commuting to work All employees receive the same dollar amount each month for use in ■ Bus capital projects(20%) offsetting commute travel expenses including bus passes,vanpool fees,parking passes(the employer must charge for Section 5311 Funds parking)or other expenses associated with carpooling,bicycling, and walking to work Any surplus can be pocketed The non-urbanized area funding program provides transit capital and operating assistance through the states to rural In essence,the transportation allowance is the cafeteria approach to commute travel. areas(less than 50,000 in population) FTA provides states with an annual appropriation to fund the maintenance, Funding Opportunities development, improvement, and use of public transportation systems in rural and small urban areas In reviewing the transit improvement needs of the FM 518 comdor,a critical concern is obtaining the appropriate funding to initiate and operate transit services in the community Currently,the Gulf Coast Center is the recipient of Section 5310 Funds the 5311 Federal/State Grant funds for the non-urbanized areas along FM 518 Lack of funding has been cited as a Currently, a number of residents in the FM 518 comdor are elderly or infinned and have a need for special principal reason for the inability to expand and diversify transit services in the corridor The following is an overview transportation services The Gulf Coast Center provides special services for the disabled members of the community. of the financial resources potentially available to fund transit operating and capital improvements Included are There is a special needs funding program that provides transit capital assistance to the states for allocation to federal funding programs, as well as potential state funding sources organizations or governmental authorities that offer specialized transportation services to elderly persons and to persons with disabilities This program allows for the transfer of funds to the non-urbanized area program Federal Funding Sources (Section 5311 Funds),provided that the funds are used for the purpose authorized A shuttle service for the elderly Federal funding for public transportation comes through the U S Department of Transportation(USDOT). USDOT and disabled to major area destinations such as clinics,medical services, and shopping centers would be a candidate programs and funding for public transportation were established under the Intermodal Surface Transportation for these funds Efficiency Act(ISTEA)of 1991,which established authorizing levels and programs for transit and highways projects Surface Transportation Program(STP)Flexible Funding and institutionalized the ability to shift funds from one program to another depending on local priorities The ISTEA Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) STP funds are flexible funds that may be used by states and localities for expired in 1997 and was replaced by the TEA-21 TEA-21,which was effective from 1998 to 2003,generally maintained the previously established programs and raised the overall level of funding TEA-21 provided funding for transit and highway projects Under TEA-21, FHWA funds provides a substantial new source of funds for transit USDOT and its subsidiary agencies, including the Federal Transit Administration(FTA) The third iteration of the projects surface transportation program,known as SAFETEA, is currently undergoing reauthorization TEA-21 has been extended into 2004 until this reauthorization occurs Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality(CMAQ)Funds CMAQ provides federal transportation funds to support state and local projects that reduce transportation related air Section 5307 Funds pollution TEA-21 provided for as much as$8 1 billion for the CMAQ program from 1998 through 2003 CMAQ With the expected growth of the Pearland, Friendswood,and League City,the population in each of these projects are selected for implementation from the approved regional transportation improvement plan(TIP)and are communities will soon exceed 50,000 and therefore different funding sources will become available to the area submitted to FTA or FHWA,as appropriate, for final approval and authorization to proceed The types of projects The Federal Section 5307 formula program is allocated to urbanized areas over 50,000 in population,accordmg to a eligible for CMAQ funds include. tiered formula based on size FTA has traditionally only awarded grants to one recipient per urbanized area, leaving • Travel Demand Management Strategies that recipient to then pass funds through to other qualified users The program is structured to provide total flexibility • Transit Improvements to end-users regarding use of the funds for operations and capital facilities,except for urbanized areas over 200,000 in ■ Shared Ride Services population which cannot use funds for operating assistance A 50% local match for operating assistance and a 20% • Traffic Flow Improvements local match for capital facility assistance is required. • Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs Section 5309 Funds The start-up of new transit services(e g,new express bus routes or new shuttle service linking major activity centers) Section 5309 is the primary federal funding program for capital investment in new transit facilities and equipment. is supported under the CMAQ program in an effort to tap new markets for transit While CMAQ cannot be a Unlike other FTA funding categories that allocate money on a formula basis, Section 5309 funds are awarded on a permanent source of funding for transit service,the goal is to encourage experimentation to determine what new types discretionary basis for a particular project In practice,all Section 5309 funds are allocated to projects through of services are viable earmarks in annual federal appropriations legislation The eligible federal share is 80%,but FTA encourages applicants to develop a non-federal match to secure Section 5309 funds State Funding Sources • Legislation enacted by the Texas Legislature during the most recent session enhanced the ability of local officials to establish Regional Mobility Authorities(RMA)and to use surplus RMA revenues on ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 48 triC Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan transportation projects in the geographic area of the RMA Counties within the Houston-Galveston region should consider the possible benefits to transit if considering establishment of a RMA. • The Texas Legislature has proposed amending the state constitution to enable local governments to levy a Intersection Issue Mitigation Measure Local Option Transportation Tax(LOTT). With voter approval, a LOTT could be collected and used to fund Pearland transportation projects,which would include transit This revenue option could be evaluated based on Split-phased north south pedestrian Re-stripe lanes will allow concurrent north- regional needs Information regarding the costs and benefits of a LOTT to the region will be required by the 3 —Silver Lake Drive movements south pedestrian movement state legislators before the tax can be levied 4 —Wal-Mart Driveway Split-phased north-south pedestrian Re-stripe lanes will allow concurrent north- movements south pedestrian movement 5—CR 94A/ Home Split-phasing is causing long delays for New lanes and re striping of lanes will 6.7 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS Depot pedestrian movements eliminate split-phasing and decrease pedestrian wait time 18—Walnut/ Unusual intersection geometrymakes Prohibit pedestrian movement on the east Almost all the access management improvements(medians,driveways, signals, safety, and operational)positively Barry side of the intersection and associate new impactpedestrian and bicycle travel Too frequent driveways, lack of medians, andpoor intersection controls increase Rose pedestrian crossing movements hazardous P Y q Y > crossing with Barry Rose phase safety hazards and decrease mobility to pedestrians and bicyclists in the same way they do for automobiles In Offset T-intersection and split-phasing Prohibit pedestrian crossings on the west general,pedestrians and bicyclists need to be well protected when they cross major streets and have space reserved 19—Sherwood present barriers to safe pedestrian north- side of the intersection and instruct to cross for their use in the ROW The following strategies should be used to promote pedestrian and bicycle travel along the south crossings on east side FM 518 corridor League City High traffic volume and split-phasing split phasing, but restrict pedestrian • Driveway spacing The minimum connection spacing listed in Exhibit 5.4-3 will reduce conflicts and 41 — Hobbs/ Lafayette creates a hazardous pedestrian Retain Retain crossings on the east side hazards for pedestrians and bicyclists environment • Sidewalk location Requiring that all sidewalks be located along private property lines or one foot from the 45— Interurban Pedestrian movement is associated with the Associate pedestrian signal interval with ROW line and placing sidewalks at the maximum practical distance from the curb provides pedestrians with very low volume southbound movement higher volume northbound movement safety from street traffic and protection from being splashed by passing vehicles Table 6 7-1 Short-Term Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements • Crosswalk location Locating crosswalks on the side of the intersection that has the best site clearance for drivers will drastically reduce conflicts • Medians Medians offer areas of safe refuge to pedestrians Pedestrian crash rates are lower on roads with In the medium-term,the highest priority for sidewalks and bike facilities along FM 518 should be given to locations raised medians than on undivided highways or those with continuous TWLTLs Medians also reduce delay that are in the vicinity of schools,parks,public buildings,and other areas with high concentrations of pedestrians and which is a major disincentive to walking bicyclists. Sections of FM 518 present a clear danger to children walking and bicycling to school Appendix D • Right-turn lanes Right-turn lanes reduce conflicts and confusion for the pedestrian and bicyclist Right-turn contains a map of schools that are within walking distance of the FM 518 corridor Table 6.7-2 details the needed lanes provide a dedicated space for vehicles to decelerate and turn using a defined turn radius This allows for improvements to make some of the most critical sections of the roadway more pedestrian and bicycle friendly narrower crossings for pedestrians and a more defined intersection for bicyclist Bike lanes should be aligned on the left side of a right-turn lane Corridor Segments Improvement Pearland Hatfield to McLean south side of FM 518 with crosswalk 8-foot Multi use trail • Signal timing Associating the pedestrian movement with the highest volume traffic movement will provide at Anthony (midblock) a longer interval for pedestrians to cross the roadway Pearland Anthony to Woody north side of FM 518 5-foot Sidewalk League City Landing Boulevard to IH-45 Frontage Road 8-foot Multi-use trail League City FM 2094/ FM 270 to SH 146 12-14-foot Multi-use trail Improvements The study team identified seven intersections in the FM 518 corridor that represent a serious hazard to pedestrian Table 6 7-2. Medium-Term Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements travel. Section three of this chapter details the hazards of split-phased signals that have a pedestrian movement associated with them. These signal phases occur quite frequently throughout the FM 518 corridor and in some cases have created hazardous pedestrian situations. Table 6.7-1 outlines these seven locations,but more detailed information can be found in Chapter 6.3. Funding Opportunities Prior to the 1990s only a few million dollars a year of federal funds were being invested in pedestrian or bicycle facilities While the energy crisis of the early 1970s had spawned new interest and some modest government Chapter 6 Short and MEdium-Term Corridor Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan Kmn ❑�� anidiey-HorAssoraates,lnc 49 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc 11D10 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan initiatives to make improvements for bicycling, very little money from the government at any level was invested in pedestrian and bicycle facilities Likewise,the outdoor recreation industry and busmess community in general provided very little fundmg for facilities,plannmg,programs, or organizational development Throughout the late 1970s and 1980s the largest amounts of funds for bicycling and walking were invested by state and local parks agencies building multi-use trails,however even these levels of investment were very small compared to what is happening today Transportation Enhancements(TE)activities are federally funded community-based projects that expand travel choices and enhance the transportation experience by improving the cultural,historic,aesthetic,and environmental aspects of our transportation infrastructure. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities, such as new or reconstructed sidewalks,walkways, or curb ramps, bike lane striping,wide paved shoulders,bike parking, and bus racks; off-road trails; bike and pedestrian bndges and underpasses are eligible under the program In January and February 2002,the Texas Transportation Commission selected 217 projects with an amount exceeding$155 million The next call for projects will occur after the reauthorization of the federal transportation bill To obtain additional information regarding the Transportation Enhancement Program,please contact the TxDOT District Enhancement Coordinators in the Houston District The Texas Legislature passed the"Matthew Brown Act" into law in 2001. The Act includes the Safe Routes to School Program,which is designed to create safe ways for children to reach school The program adds new crosswalks,trails, and bike lanes to the existing infrastructure as well as promotes traffic calming measures The FM 518 corridor is uniquely qualified for these funds.Projects located on the State system forgo the 20%match normally required for projects Project proposal applications can be submitted by any political subdivision If the Pearland,Friendswood, or Clear Creek ISDs are interested in sponsoring a project they should contact their city or county offices to develop a project proposal. The proposal must be submitted to the District Engineer in the Houston TxDOT District Office The following guidelines determine what projects can be submitted. • Projects may be located on or off the state highway system,but must be located on public property • Projects must be located within a two mile radius of a school • Federal funds requested will be limited to $500,000. • Projects can cover multiple school sites if similar work is performed at each site. • Local project funding match of 20%is required unless the project is located on the state highway system in which case TxDOT will provide the match • A project on the state highway system will not be eligible if the district finds that the project interferes or disrupts any planned improvements or existing infrastructure In considering project proposals under this section TxDOT shall consider: • The demonstrated need of the applicant • The potential of the proposal to reduce child injuries and fatalities • The potential of the proposal to encourage walking and bicycling among students • Identification of safety hazards • Identification of current and potential walking and bicycling routes to school • Support for the projects proposed by local school-based associations,traffic engineers,elected officials, law enforcement agencies, and school officials. ChaptEr 6 Short and MEdium-TErm Corridor ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 50 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan -1-1010 ChaptEr 7 tL1rE Corr FU idor NEEdS / ImprOVEmEntS Comprehensive Plan The FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan seeks to improve safety,traffic flow, and reduce motorist delay through the cities of Pearland, Friendswood,and League City Therefore,the plan contributes to the public health, 7.1 INTRODUCTION safety, and welfare of the communities The cities may validate this plan or demonstrate an overall public commitment to managing access by The population surrounding FM 518 will increase from 135,000 in 2003 to well over 325,000 in 2025 Comprehensive Access Reference this plan as a policy statement in the comprehensive plan: For FM 518 to remain a vital residential and commercial Plan Management Goal The FM 518 corridor within the City limits of Pearland,Friendswood,League City,and Kemah is to corridor it must be properly planned for and maintained. Statement be planned,designed,and managed in accordance with the FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan. Exhibit 7.1-1 introduces how the roles that municipal / \ plans and codes may apply to access management strategies. This chapter contains recommendations on Including policy statements in the transportation and land use element of the comprehensive plan. how the comprehensive plans,thoroughfare plans, and Zoning Subdivision ultimately the local municipal codes of the four cities Ordinance Ordinance Transportation Element can direct future growth in a manner that supports access • A nontraversable, landscaped median will be provided on all new multi-lane major arterials Undivided management strategies roadways and roadways with a continuous TWLTL will be considered for reconstruction when the volume exceeds 20,000 VPD Compliment Access Access Management • Consider median barrier techniques for all unsignalized median openings Management Standards Guidelines • The Thoroughfare Plan should designate public ROW to mitigate impacts to the functional integrity of FM 518 and other major arterials. Exhibit 7 1-1 Access Management in Municipal Policy • New driveway connections should not be located within the functional distance of an intersection Land Use Element 7.2 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS • Access to land development along FM 518 shall be preserved through the use of parallel roads, side streets, and cross access easements connecting adjacent developments There are many ways in which planning documents and municipal codes can address access management issues and • Properties under the same ownership,consolidated for development, or part of phased development plans set the stage for an effective corridor access management program. Two of the most widely accepted methods are to shall be considered one property for the purposes of access management Access points to such developments reference the corridor access management plan or make broad policy statements concerning access management in shall be the minimum necessary to provide reasonable access,and not the maximum available, for that their comprehensive plans,thoroughfare plans, and local municipal codes Both options are explained in further detail property frontage • New residential subdivisions should include an internal street layout that connects to the streets of in the following sections surrounding developments to accommodate travel demand between adjacent neighborhoods,without the need to use the major thoroughfare system Authority ■ Residential subdivisions abutting arterial roadways should be designed so that street connections conform to the access connection spacing standards for those roadways Responsibilities granted by Chapter 213 001 of the Texas Municipal Code are for the purpose of promoting sound • Commercial development should be encouraged to share common access connections as well as to provide development of municipalities and promoting public health, safety, and welfare Local Comprehensive Plans are the a convenient system of interparcel circulation so that customers as well as delivery and service vehicles can policy and decision making guide for future development and capital improvements in the municipality It is also the move between the sites correct document to identify the desired access management approach • Zoning and subdivision actions shall discourage shallow commercial strip development where most, or all, Municipalities also have the authority to practice access management through the rules and definitions of the State of access is directed to the abutting major public roadway Texas Local Government Code Chapter 212"Municipal Regulation of Subdivision and Property Development" • Commercial office and retail should be encouraged to develop activity centers, schematically illustrated as the preferred pattern in Exhibit 7.2-1 This land use arrangement facilitates pedestrian circulation between There in,the Cities of Pearland,Friendswood,League City,and Kemah may adopt the FM518 Corridor Access Management Plan as a part of the existing subdivision and zoning regulations or tailor sections of the ordinances to businesses and eliminates the need for vehicles to use the public street when moving from one establishment advance access management strategies to another Also,the corner clearance increases between driveways and the intersection,this improves safety and intersection operations by reducing the occurrence of conflicts within close proximity of the intersection ChaptEr 7 FuturE Corridor NEEdS/Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan �_ril mandKiley-Horn Associates,Inc. 51 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) -11010 FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan The following objectives should be kept in mind in the location and design of all access connections—public streets and private driveways alike ■ Minimize the difference in speed between vehicles turning off the roadway and following through traffic • Avoid encroachment of turning vehicles upon the adjacent traffic lane • Provide adequate intersection sight distance J • Provide sight distance to enable drivers on the roadway to locate the access connection and to determine its geometrics so as to be able to safely decelerate and complete the entry maneuver t • Provide sufficient throat length and on-site circulation to prevent traffic problems from"spilling"back onto Activity Center the highway • Provide the number of lanes and throat width to produce efficient traffic flow for traffic entering and leaving •More highway frontage the site •More depth of circulation • Provide a safe environment for all users, including pedestrians(including the disabled),bicyclists, •More flexibility in site design bus patrons, and motor vehicles •Fewer access problems at the intersection Access Connection Spacing Exhibit 7 2-1 Placement of Commercial Activity Centers (CUTR) The access connection distances in the following sections are intended for passenger cars on a level grade These distances may be increased for downgrades,truck traffic, or where otherwise indicated for the specific circumstances of the site and the roadway In other cases, shorter distances may be appropriate to provide reasonable access, and Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance such decisions should be based on safety and operational factors supported by an engineering study The City Councils' finding and determining that promoting the safe flow of traffic along FM 518 is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens Therefore, ordaining the FM 518 Corridor Access Management as The distance between access connections, measured along the edge of the traveled way from the closest edge of a chapter in the Code of Ordinances pavement of the first access connection to the closest edge of pavement of the second access connection Exhibit 7.2-2 provides minimum connection spacing criteria for FM 518 A lesser connection spacing than set forth in this document The purpose of this section is to coordinate land use and transportation planning by establishing access management may be allowed in the following situations. strategies within existing engineering design guidelines The first step for local agencies is to coordinate with their local TxDOT district or area office early in the development process Having an understanding of TxDOT's access • To keep from land-locking a property management policy and issues in the area are critical to a successful partnership Requiring property owners to • Replacement or re-establishment of access to the highway under a reconstruction/rehabilitation projects dedicate land on their common property lines for parking lot cross access or develop joint access easements between property owners Posted Speed Distance (mph) (ft) Cross and Shared Access 30 200 Refer to the Section 7.2 for land use element requirements 35 250 40 305 45 360 Auxiliary Lanes > 50 425 On urban arterial streets, speed change lanes generally provide space for the deceleration and storage of turning vehicles At major developments right turn deceleration lanes should be considered when the peak hour volume Table 7 2-2 FM 518 Minimum Connection Spacing (VPH)exceeds 60 The length of speed change lanes should be designed to comply with the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual 7.3 FUTURE THOROUGHFARE PLANNING Driveway Design Driveways provide the physical transition between the public highway and the abutting property Driveways should As communities grow and change,roads originally intended to provide access to homes or businesses maybe needed be located and designed to minimize negative impacts on traffic while providing safe entry and exit from the to serve through traffic In addition, some of the access problems we now see on FM 518 are the result of poor development served The TxDOT Roadway Design Manual provides standards for driveway design that promote subdivision and zoning practices in the past Section 7.2 addresses a few ways to mitigate this problem access management strategies. Consequently,when land development and thoroughfare planning are not coordmated,problems include limits to the ROW, development in close proximity to the ROW,and opposition by owners of adjacent properties and affected businesses Land for access improvements may not be available, making it difficult to implement certain access Chapter 7 Future Corridor Needs/Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 52 Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access ManagEment Plan management techniques. Also, rights for access to property must be respected Therefore, landowners and business City Roadway Limits participation in the thoroughfare planning process is critical for the process to be a success The public involvement Pearland FM 865 Harris County Line to FM 518 program and subsequent meetings with landowners and concerned citizens utilized in this project represents the type Pearland SH 35 Harris County Line to FM 518 of partnerships that are needed to promote access management and thoroughfare planning. Table 7.3-3 contains the Pearland Scarsdale Boulevard Sageking to Yost recommendations for additional thoroughfare planning devised through this process The team took into account Pearland Yost Scarsdale to FM 518 current city thoroughfare plans (Table 7.3-2)and H-GAC's 2022 (Table 7.3-1)planned improvements that will have Pearland Dixie Farm Harris County Line to SH 35 a direct impact on FM 518 Friendswood Friendswood Link City Limits to FM 518 Friendswood/ Algoa-Friendswood Road FM 518 to SH 35 City Roadway Limits League Pearland SH 288 Frontage CR 59 to Beltway 8 League City Bay Area Boulevard FM 518 to Candlewood Pearland SH288 Frontage Beltway 8 to CR 59 League City IH-45 N of FM 517 to North of FM 518 Pearland Smith Ranch Road (CR94) South Fork Road to McHard League City FM 270 FM 518 to FM 646 Pearland Cullen /Old Choclate Bayou Boulevard Beltway 8 to McKeever Road (CR 100) League City SH 146 3rd Street(Kemah) to FM 1765/ FM 348 Pearland Manvel/ Reid Road (FM 1128) Brookside Village to McKeever Road League City FM 518 Bypass FM 518 to FM 270 (CR100) Table 7 3-2 Pearland, Friendswood, and League City's Planned Thoroughfares Pearland Bailey Road SH 288 Overpass to CR 129 Pearland McHard Road SH 288 Overpass to Beltway 8 Brookside Village to Hastings Cannon The final product is a list of improvements that will support the short-term access management strategies, Pearland Harkey Road (Alvin) while preparing the area for the outstanding growth projections(Table 7.3-2) Pearland Veterans FM 518 to Hastings Cannon (Alvin) Pearland SH 35 Main Street Beltway 8 to Hastings Cannon City Roadway Limits Pearland Barry Rose Road FM 518 to Blackhawk Boulevard Pearland FM 518 SH 288 to McLean Airline-Fort Bend/South Fork/ Pearland FM 518 Walnut/ Berry to Dixie Farm Pearland Magnolia/John Lizer/ Liberty Road SH 288 Overpass to FM 518 Pearland New east-west Collector CR 94A to SH 288 Frontage Friendswood Melody Road Edgewood Road to Longwood Road League City FM 518 FM 528 to SH 3 Friendswood Edgewood/ Hastings Road (FM 2351) SH 35 to Beaner Road League City/ Kemah FM 518 FM 2094 to SH 146 Friendswood FM 528 (Parkwood Drive) County Line to Beltway 8 Frontage Table 7 3-3 Thoroughfare Recommendations Friendswood CR 129 (Pearland Parkway) FM 518 to FM 528 Friendswood Blackhawk Boulevard Edgewood Road to FM 528 (Parkwood Drive) Appendix E may be referenced for locations of the aforementioned thoroughfares. Friendswood East Loop FM 518 to Brittany Bay Boulevard League City SH 96 Overpass on IH-45 Extension and Widening Recommendations League CitySH 96 (BritneyBayBoulevard) East of IH-45 to CR 129 (Pearland Pkwy/ g Peyson Road) While,the operational and management techniques recommended in this study will greatly enhance the performance League City New Arterial (16th Street alignment) SH 3 to Western City Limit and safety of the roadway, FM 518 has the potential to play a greater role in regional mobility and engage H-GAC's League City Grand Parkway SH 146 to Western City Limit Smart Street concept by extending FM 518 to the west The extension will provide greater connectivity to West of IH 45 loop around Nasa 1 and neighboring communities and decrease the demand on nearby collector streets and toll facilities The extension League City Parkwood Road (New Road) reconnect at to Nasa 1 east of FM 270 should be at least to FM 521 and perhaps farther Using the existing ROW segments, FM 518 could be widened to FM 518 South to City Limits (Grand six-lanes, thus bringing its functional characteristics closer to those of a Smart Street The most critical segments League City New Arterial Parkway) (based on recent traffic growth trends) include the following League City New Bypass FM 518 north to FM 270 • In western Pearland, from SH 288 on the west to McLean on the east • In eastern Pearland, from Walnut/Barry Rose on the west to Dixie Farm on the east Table 7 3-1 HGAC's 2022 MTP Corridor Improvements • In League City, between Bay Area Boulevard on the west to IH-45 • In League City, between IH-45 and SH 3 • In League City, between(intersection that's the east terminus of the 4-lane undivided segment)to FM 2094 Chapter 7 FuturE Corridor NEEdS/ImprovEmEnts Draft AccEss Corridor Plan o❑ and AssodHorn ates,Inc 53 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corndor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright C 200-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan t-laC Based on current traffic volumes, it would also be desirable for the League City segment between SH 3 and Corridor Section AADT Facility to Consider (intersection that's the east terminus of the four-lane undivided segment)to have six-lanes However,because of the SH 288 West Side to FM 865 Cullen 24,000 B historic nature of this area and the large trees on each side, it is recognized that widening of this segment will most CR 89 to FM 1128 26,000 B likely not be practical Harkey /Oday to Woody/ Corrigan 28,000 B Halbert/ McLean to SH 35/ Main 22,000 B 7.4 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE NEEDS SH 35/ Main to Sherwood 26,000 B Westminster to Woodcreek 37,000 S TxDOT has committed to consider pedestrian and bicycle facilities in all stages of planning, design,and construction Dixie Farm to Sunset Meadows/ 30,000 S of roadway and enhancement projects The State Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator is tasked with integrating Winding walkingand bicycling into the operational policies, plans, and programs of the department, MPOs, and local Sunset Meadows/Winding to Whispering Pines 21,000 B y g p p p Winding Way to FM 528 / Parkwood 16,100 W government entities by providing encouragement, supplying expertise,and promoting training Therefore, it is FM 528/ Parkwood to Country Road 15,200 W imperative that all bicycle and pedestrian improvements on and adjacent to FM 518 are coordinated with TxDOT Country Road to Williamsport 11,700 W Newport to Calder/ Devereux 38,000 S In the long-term pedestrian and bicycle facilities should be considered on FM 518 during roadway reconstruction and Interurban to SH 3 38,000 S rehabilitation, pavement marking elimination and application and installation of highway traffic signals Future Houston to FM 270/ FM 2094 31,000 S facility improvements are recommended below FM 518 Split/ Marina to South Shore 16,500 W FM 1266 /Columbia to Lawrence Road 9,100 W Bicycle Improvements Kemah Oaks to SH 146 10,300 W Table 7 4-1 Possible Bicycle Facility Types Future bicycle facilities along FM 518 will most likely come in the following forms W=wide lane— 14 to 15 feet wide,a shared lane or wide curb lane that is not marked as an exclusive bike facility Pedestrian Improvements Consider when AADT is below 20,000 and speeds between 30 to 40 mph. While continuous sidewalks are the goal,retrofitting areas without them will usually occur in phases. Lack of a B=bike lane—six-feet wide and striped(marked) lane for the exclusive use of bikes Consider when AADT are seamless system is no excuse not to provide parts of the system Improvements to the pedestrian infrastructure should above 20,000 and speeds between 35 to 45 mph be considered during S=separated lane—anything wider than a six-feet on-street bike lane This includes seven and eight-feet wide bike • Roadway reconstruction or resurfacing projects lanes, bike lanes with separation striping and markings and bike lanes on the sidewalk(multi-use path) Consider • Driveway reconsolidation projects when AADT exceeds 30,000 and speeds between 40 to 50 mph • Major redevelopments • Water and sewer projects r ,.f_ f'" Traffic volumes and speeds were used to analyze each section of the corridor are shown below in Table 7.4-1.These • Traffic signal replacement projects An t, � .,,,, recommendations are considered to be the minimum facility to be considered during future roadway construction _ ! -. , projects ROW considerations, local pedestrian/bicycle plans, funding,and other factors will ultimately determine Other recommendations that will ensure the safety and sustainability the type of facility of sidewalk projects ■ Street furniture placement should not restrict pedestrian flow • Ensure that there is enough room for wider sidewalks, bike lanes,and planting strips before proceeding with construction - ■ Landscaping in medians should not obstruct the visibility 1 -between pedestrians and approaching motorists - • Median crossings at midblock and intersection locations must �,. m... be fully accessible by means of ramps or cut-throughs,with detectable warnings Exhibit 7 4 1 Raised median with pedestrian crossing ChaptEr 7 FuturE Corridor NEEdS/Improvements Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 54 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss ManagEmEnt Plan -1-11010 7.5 FUTURE TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES service with approximately four AM trips and four PM trips daily In the off peak period,the buses could be used to supplement the demand responsive service or for the initiation of an area shuttle service The FM 518 corridor in the future will play a very important role in regional mobility While the access management recommendation outlined in this plan will provide for greater mobility,more will need to be done to sustain the Teleworking corridor FM 518 will be the major east-west connection to high capacity transit along SH 288,IH-45, and SH 146 in the future The short-term recommendation in Chapter 6 will provide for a base of riders that will make future transit Simply defined,teleworking is working at home or another off site location, full-or part-time While employees may programs more viable The study team recommends pursuing a limited fixed route service,teleworking, and flexi-van be hooked up to the main office via a sophisticated computer network, it is possible to telework,with as little as a pen, operations in the long-term paper, and phone. Teleworking increases options Perhaps the main reason people are teleworking now is simply because they can In the United States, 15 7 million people telework(AT&T Survey, 1998), consisting of company employees working at home or another off site location, on a full-or part-time basis. Bus Service Flexi-Van Jobs are more portable than they once were. The United States used to be largely an industrial nation In fact, in 1950 Flexi-van service is a demand responsive, curb-to-curb service with paid drivers,that utilizes leased 15-passenger only 17% of workers were in information or service business like sales, public relations,personnel,banking,health- vans. This service will provide rides from residential pockets to Park&Ride lots and major area destinations, care, and publishing By 1980,that number grew more than half Teleworking is a viable option for large and small such as shopping centers and medical complexes within the corridor The flexi-vans can run on a limited basis, companies in today's economy In fact, more than 65%of teleworkers are employed by firms with less than 100 either four to five-hours everyday during peak periods of travel. The flexi-van service could provide a fixed trip to employees the major destinations being served by the demand responsive service The flexi-van service could be the catalyst for developing a daily fixed route service and would meet the current demand for more local service without making Teleworking is appropriate for use in this corridor for these reasons and it can mitigate disruptions caused by a natural a reservation disater Employees' home offices become a community's hidden asset when an emergency occurs. Teleworkers are able to maintain productivity during major disasters and this attribute could make employees from your community Fixed Route Transit more attractive to companies To facilitate teleworkers,the municipalities should consider the following facilities In coordination with the establishment of high capacity transit service along SH 288, IH-45, and SH 146, fixed route service that serves the Pearland/Friendswood area, League City area, and Kemah/FM 146 corridor should be At Satellite Work Centers—Often confused with"branch offices," satellite work centers differ in one important explored The service could be provided by two or three-routes with a transit center serving as the hub for respect all the people who work at them also live near them For example, if an employer in Katy had many connectivity The transit center could be located at a junction where commuter service is also provided With the employees living in Galveston,the employer could lease office space in Galveston for the occasional use of development of fixed route service,appropriate signage and transit amenities(e g bus stop shelters,benches, lighting, employees The employees' managers would continue to work from the main office etc.)would be required The service would mostly be weekday service,but future demand potential suggests that limited weekend and evening service also be provided At Neighborhood Work Centers—Similarly,neighborhood work centers provide an opportunity for employees to work closer to home—in this case, in office facilities with employees of other firms Tenants in a neighborhood Initially more commuter service provided by express bus will be required to accommodate the increased demand for work center usually share support services, such as clerical help,telecommunications equipment, photocopying trips to the Houston area An additional Park&Ride lot will be warranted on the eastern portion of the FM 518 machines,and office supplies. corridor to meet anticipated growth in the area More buses will be required to service the existing and new lots with • Offer implementation assistance to employers including development of policies and procedures, employee some of the buses destined to locations south of the corridor orientation, and program evaluation Commuter rail service will also be a viable option in future years,beyond 2025 Extensions from the METRO Rail • Promote benefits to management. service in the southeast corridor could service the FM 518 area. Either the FM 865 or SH 35 corridors rail transit • Promote teleworkmg at the home-end could be developed to provide a direct connection to METRO regional transit system • Create telecenters throughout the area Shuttle service from the FM 518 to the Clear Lake City and the space and aeronautics related developments should also be part of the fixed route transit service, given a coordinated plan and funding program between METRO and the transit entity servicing Brazoria and Galveston counties Provide commuter bus service from the Park&Ride lot located near the intersection of FM 518 and SH 288 Service would be to the Texas Medical Center area From the Texas Medical Center,the buses would turn back to return to the FM 518 corridor, requiring that commuters not destined to the Texas Medical Center transfer to the METRO transit system to reach their final destination A minimum of two buses would be required to operate the commuter ChaptEr 7 FuturE Corridor NEEdS/ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑r/ 1 Kimley-Horn and Assoc ates,Inc. 55 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEment Plan ChaptEr 7 FuturE Corridor Needs/ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 56 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan ChaptEr 8 8.2 STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS Study REcommEndations and Action Plan Short-Term Recommendations The short-term recommendations concentrate on improvements that do not require major purchases of ROW, have a 8.1 OVERVIEW short construction period and need only minor coordination with property owners Tables 8.2-2,8.2-3,and 8.2-4 detail the short-term median and pedestrian/bicycle intersection improvements for the corridor The study team also The study team utilized traffic modeling software, crash analysis techniques, and field verifications to examine the identified corridor wide short-term improvements current situation along FM 518 The FM 518 Corridor Stakeholder Committee approved a menu of access • Incorporating isolated traffic signals into a closed loop system and then optimizing all signals for current management treatments based upon their ability to the reduce traffic delay and improve traffic flow and safety for traffic motorist, pedestrians, and bicyclists. The study team then applied these access management techniques to the • Addition of block numbers to overhead street signs. roadways most hazardous and congested sections The improvements were then presented to the public for review. ■ Early warning signage of approaching major intersections Based upon these comments the study team made modifications to the plan, estimated costs, and generated an action • Continuous street lighting of similar strength and spacing plan. The following study recommendations and action plan is the product of an comprehensive public involvement • Identifying agencies or groups to landscape new medians and ROW process, coordinated effort amongst all interested parties, and continuation of the partnerships needed for success ■ Adding back panels to signal heads to reduce glare City Phase Improvement Type Cost Estimate -- Pearland Short-Term Intersections $244, 500 Intersection# Map# Location Feet of Cost Estimate Median Pearland Short-Term Medians $517,950 Pearland Pearland Medium-Term Intersections $207,000 2 1 West of SH 288 Intersection to Silver Lake 700 $30,000 Pearland Medium-Term Medians $410,570 3,4 1,2 Silver Lake Village Drive/Wal-Mart 700 $30,000 Pearland Medium-Term Pedestrian / Bicycle $310,200 6 2 Miller Ranch CR 93 1,200 $51,600 Pearland Total $1,690,220 7 3 Southwick Road 1,250 $53,750 Fnendswood Short-Term Intersections $46,000 9 5 Old Chocolate Bayou CR 89 1,100 $47,300 Fnendswood Short-Term Medians $51,600 10 6 Manvel Road (FM 1128) 1,050 $45,150_ 11 8 Harkey/Oday 900 $38,700 Fnendswood Medium-Term Intersections $100,000 11a 9 Hatfield 650 $27,950 Friendswood Medium-Term Medians $283,800 12 9 Woody/Corrigan 1,200 $51,600 Friendswood Total $481,400 13 9 McLean / Halbert 700 $30,100 League City / Kemah Short-Term Intersections $46,500 14 10 Mykawa 450 $19,350 League City / Kemah Short-Term Medians $236,500 26 16 Dixie Farm 1,400 $60,200 League City / Kemah Medium-Term Intersections $1,020,000 Fnendswood _ League City / Kemah Medium-Term Medians $215,000 35 23 FM 528 Parkwood 1,200 $51,600 Lea•ue Cit / Kemah Medium-Term Pedestrian / Bic cle $3,370,400 36 28 Brookdale/ Bay Area Boulevard 2,400 $103,200 41 and 42 32 Royal- Hobbs/ Lafayette to west of IH-45 1,000 $43,000 Total Short-Term $1,143,050 43 and 43a 32 East of IH-45 to 40-feet east of Wesley 1,300 55,900 Total Medium-Term $5,916,970 43a 33 Highland Drive 600 $25,800 Grand Total $7,060,020 44 33 Devereux/Calder to Englewood 1,300 $55,900 Table 8 2-1 Cost Summary of All Short-and Medium-Term Recommendations 45 33 Interurban 1,200 $51,600 Short-Term Median Improvement Total $872,700 Table 8 2-2 Short-Term Raised Median Recommendations ChaptEr 8 Study REcommEndations and Action Plan Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑onIGmley-Horn -L7 and Associates,Inc. 57 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright 0 2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates.Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan Intersection Mitigation Measure Cost Estimate Intersection Add Capacity Timing Change Cost Estimate Pearland The cost of these ID Name Re-stripe lanes will allow concurrent north-south improvements are Pearland 3—Silver Lake Drive pedestrian movement reflected within the short- 2 SH 288 East Side WB (Right) RT Overlap $28,000 Re-stripe lanes will allow concurrent north-south term intersection NB (Right, Through, Left), SB (Left, Shared Right- 4—Wal-Mart Driveway p improvements 3 Silverlake Village $8,500 edestrian movement Through) 5—CR 94A/ Home Depot New lanes and re-striping of lanes will eliminate 4 Wal-Mart NB (Left, Shared Right-Through), SB (Left, split-phasing and decrease pedestrian wait time $8,000 Prohibitpedestrian movement on east side of Shared Right-Through) P CR 94/Home NB (Dual Left, Shared Right-Through), SB (Left, 18—Walnut/ Barry Rose intersection and associate new crossing with 5 Depot Shared Right-Through) SW-Phased $8,500Barry Rose phase 8 FM 865/Cullen SB (Left, Through, Right) SW-Phased $8,000 19—Sherwood Prohibit pedestrian crossings on west side of 9 CR 89/ Kroger S hased $5,000 intersection and instruct to cross on east side 10 FM 1128 NB (Dual Left, Shared Right-Through), SB (Left, Through Right) used $19,000 41 —Hobbs/ Lafayette Retain split-phasing, but restrict pedestrian NB (Left, Through, Right), SB (Left, Shared Right- crossings on the east side 11 Harkey/Oday Through) $20,500 45— Interurban Associate pedestrian signal interval with higher volume northbound movement 13 Halbert/ McLean Halbert one-way Singlc phase $8,000 15 SH 35/ Main WB (Right) Add logic plan $20,000 Table 8 2-4 Short-Term Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements 17 Old Alvin WB (Right) $11,000 18 Walnut/ Berry Right-turn $8,000 Rose overlap 20 Westminster Single phase $5,000 21 Pearland Parkway *EB&WB (Right), NB (Dual Left, Through, Right- $55,000 Through) 22 Liberty *EB (Right), NB&SB (Left, Shared Right-Through) Add quad-left $32,000 Friendswood 28 FM 2351 / SEB(Right) $24,000 Edgewood 33 Whispering Pines NWB (Left) $8,000 35 FM 528/ SWB (Dual left) $14,000 Parkwood 36 Bay Area WB (Right) $23,000 Boulevard 37 Spring Landing / NB&SB (Left) Restripe Lanes Add quad left $18,500 Palomino 51 b FM 2094 WB (Extend inside left lane to accommodate $5,000 queue) Kemah 57a Wal-Mart Recommend TxDOT signal warrant be conducted New Signal $0 Short-Term Intersection Improvement Total $337,000 Table 8 2-3 Short-Term Intersection Recommendations ChaptEr 8 Study RecommEndations and Action Plan Draft Access Corridor Plan 58 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan Intersection Medium-Term Recommendations ID Name Add Capacity Cost Estimate The medium-term recommendations were prioritized based upon their ability to improve mobility, reduce hazardous Pearland roadway conditions, and reduce traffic delay These improvements attract a greater level of funding,typically are 3 Silverlake Village *EB (Right) SB (Left, Through, Right) $30,000 beyond the ROW line and may require extensive coordination with property owners The improvements listed in 8 FM 865/Cullen SB (Dual Left, Through, Right) $20,000 Tables 8.2-4,8.2-5, and 8.2-6 are the major modifications called for to make FM 518 a safer and more accessible 13 Halbert/ McLean Halbert Cul-de-sac $7,000 roadway The plan also calls for driveway consolidations, increased cross, and shared access between developments, new traffic signals, pedestrian/bicycle accommodations, and programs to increase transit potential Driveway 15 SH 35/ Main EB (Dual Left, Right), NB and SB (Dual Left, Right) $60,000 consolidation recommendations are detailed on the corridor maps in Appendix A These consolidations should be 22 Liberty NB and SB (Left, Through, Right) $40,000 considered when there is• 26 Dixie Farm WB and EB (Dual Left, Right) $50,000 • Addition of right-turn lane Friendswood Add Capacity • Redevelopment of property 28 FM 2351 / Edgewood NEB and SWB (Left), SEB(Right) $55,000 • Sidewalk, drainage, and sewer projects are planned 35 FM 528/ Parkwood SWB Ri•ht , NEB Dual left $45,000 Feet of 38 Landing Boulevard WB (Dual Left) $25,000 Intersection # Map# Location Median Cost Estimate WB (Dual Left), NB (Dual Right) Widen Hobbs 2 SB Pearland 41 Hobbs/ Lafayette lanes $55,000 10a 7 East of Roy Street 360 $15,400 EB (Dual Right), begin new right as additional auxiliary 10b 7 Garden Road 750 $32,250 42 IH-45 West Side lane $140,000 East of Pearland Drive to west of 43 IH 45 East Side EB (Dual Left) 14a 10 Texas Drive 1,000 $43,000 45 Interurban NB (Left) $25,000 16 10 Galveston Road 700 $30,100 46 SH 3 SB (Right) NB, SB, EB, and WB (Left) $95,000 17 11 Old Alvin 900 $38,700 50 Texas NB (Dual left, shared right) $20,000 18 12 Barry Rose 1,200 $51,600 Develop new NB roadway (create a partial continuous $680,000 20 12 Westminster 900 $38,700 5b FM 2094 flow intersection) Medium-Term Intersection Improvement Total 21 13 Pearland Parkway 1,500 $64,500 $1,327,000* *Estimate does not include ROW cost,which could total 20%to 40%of project cost 22 13 and 14 Liberty Drive 1,250 $53,750 23 14 Yost/Shadycrest 740 $31,820 Table 8 2-5 Medium-Term Intersection Recommendations 24 15 Woodcreek 1,000 $43,000 Friendswood Improvement Square Feet Location Map# of Concrete Cost Estimate 43a 24 -27 Lakeview to Eastern City Limit 6,600 $283,800 Type Pearland - 27 Western City Limit 2,100 $90,300 Hatfield to McLean South Side of FM 518 9 8-foot Multi-use trail 2,900 $255,200 38 31 Landing Boulevard 600 $25,800 with crosswalk at Anthony (midblock) Medium-Term Improvement Total $842,720 Anthony to Woody North Side of FM 518 9 5-door Sidewalk 1,000 $55,000 Table 8 2-4 Medium-Term Raised Median Recommendations 29, 30, 8-foot Multi-use Spring Landing Boulevard to Landing and 31 Trail 9,200 $809,600 FM 2920 to SH 146 12-14 foot Multi- 232,800 $2,560,800 use trail Medium-Term Improvement Total $3,680'600* * Estimate does not include ROW cost, which could total 20%to 40% of project cost Table 8.2-6. Medium-Term Pedestrian and Bicycle Recommendations Chapter 8 Study Recommendations and Action Plan Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan r-r1 IGmandley-Hom Associates,Inc. 59 G\TPTO\6359I 7000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Ktmley-Horn and Associates,Inc Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) -1--PAC FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan 8.3 ACTION PLAN The success of the FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan is dependant on the formation or strengthening of partnerships among the variety of involved entities This section seeks to clearly identify the roles and responsibilities of each agency in meeting the goals of this study Steps Agency 1 Policy board approval of study H-GAC 2 Secure funding for short-term intersection improvements H-GAC and TxDOT 3 Implement intersection improvements TxDOT 4. Implement system-wide signal retimmg TxDOT and Cities 5 Secure funding for median improvements H-GAC and TxDOT 6 Implement median improvements TxDOT 7 Coordinate with TxDOT for median aesthetics Cities 8 Identify funding and implement pedestrian/bike improvements H-GAC, TxDOT, and Cities 9. Adopt FM 518 Comdor Access Plan by ordinance Cities 10 Program long range thoroughfare improvements Cities 11 Update comprehensive plans and subdivision standards Cities This corridor plan attempted to gain the input and concurrence of local business leaders, stakeholders,city officials, regional leaders, and the general public It is clear from the technical analysis and public process that implementing the short-term intersection improvements, and system-wide signal retiming will provide the greatest relief in terms of operations Additionally, installing raised medians at high crash locations in the short-term will provide safety benefits to the traveling public The medium-and long-term improvements that are contained herein can be implemented as funding and need arises With that said, in order to begin to develop the remamder of the corridor it is critical that the policy recommendations contained in Chapter 7 be incorporated into each city's suite of development regulations This will allow for the corridor to develop in a more stained manor The fact is that incremental improvements will provide relief but long lasting stainable corridor success will only be achieved if some level of discipline is exercised to control access to developments ChaptEr 8 Study REcommendations and Action Plan Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan 60 Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) -11-10C FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan AppEndix A Corridor Maps AppEndix A Corridor Maps Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan runIGmey-Horn and Associates,Inc. G-\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyrtght©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc . -lit . * r s. Area Statistics a �„�, et4 t r Total crashes 84 y Crashes per mile 36 i 1 L Goal driveway density er mile 30 Total driveway density per mile 16 l)ncevya� density per mile 1 B 7 *' !• • _ . '_ l)ri e»a. density per mile W13 9 I - Driveway density ratio 0 53 I ' _v �l@ Y� r� FN 518 1 I ` _ mob. n yl _ t✓.i. . -.y _ • « - PROPOSED SNORT Ra1GE 1APROvD,Enr EX[9T[NO LANES `"� , -PROPO'.TO PEDIUN RANGE IIPROVE1(NT - PROPOSED SNORT RANGE [CPROvt?ENT _ - I -PROPOSED P£DTUN RANGE CAPROVE►ENT ,. w� �.a p; n 'U _ : `� 10 '.-.;,,,,,,,_ ,5,0 - "" . ''Ss...:',z. .o, , telllilt .ter i — S. $9L4t r ' J. TF 1 _ . __.. �: ;! j . No i 111, �—q- ` \ yt • • Nis �*� «'}'• '1 1 • •• t ��..�� ' • «J.P - y Y Ate*w e� 7 fli i \ / ` ? . +�-'�-.".� t r +.. 1 t i ti I 4 I0.11". V allti Ii i i lik IIIIIIt: . • i �+ I Ell . • . ..1. ar.......: . 4 .,___ ,, : 1. 40:- -_I - - ,. .ems...=. a P 'N tow..--- a a �" - . 1 Y411/" + ... 0 P ( { .7, Ti — i r ., .. I '• It irsi • • • % 4 a —a a ..... # 1 r1 0 a It #likt is 1 : : a 'Pt.- / III, - 3 R � A 1E� ?t 7. it t s A41(.... ��/ PI' Pfib� W y� FPt Rt 5I - .- `t1� !.1 12k . ,f s, .„. /1 -- ` J\iii4 f \ 40 i*o.� K rt4IN r • •"Mk �+ 6. r. t , f ,. �EjP bet 9 Ft NG tJmE3 N r iffii "j��► . — PROPOSED SHORT RiViCE I hPROVENENT '11.11 r • - - , S —PROPOSED Ff0t1M RIIX,E IMPROVEMENT `- r 9 ....._ I FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes p �_r1 c_i ems Other .,4 Side . Pedestrian Tamen, Stied Tenn Raised Median e Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections C_l l Kndivamn S G1l JACOBS �Tnnsponidon M Medium Term Raised Median_—...county Boundaries Right Left . Bicyclist r �! 1 and Associates,Inc. 11111 Long Term Raised Median City Boundaries I e1./fi Rear End .tiliip Headon 4 Feed Obi SCALE t"=200' Pearland 1 _ } I Area Statistics a ' , I Total crashes 84 Crashes per mile 3t; I - I i, —` 4 I Goal driveway density per mile 30 ,- :"; Total driveway density per mile 16 ,e 4 ,4 1 w a . 1,1 t Driveway density per mile EB 7 ■ - j 4 II No I111M + '� . Driveway density per mile WB I 1:-, 4 Driveway density ratio 0�3 a ` FN 6lH R. - - - 'kit ' 4 1 -r I i I ar :, . la ' r - " IP . r '11 • r • 1r '' Alit t 1 -S " I ,,,,.......46•14•09 . �� - ' _. . ,,t s EX'STING L.AlE6 +1 i�1�+► ` • F # . 7 . t PROPOSEn 57IORT RANGE I4PROVE EN r I ritt4'. PROPO5E0 NEO[UN RANCE IFPROVEtfNT11411111111,1 ,. , ti , t � :I; - , . ... _ _ . • tt: i Lb ____—:-• , -:. A4-Itiriall1F1 '5 Ail 4 1„....401. 1 I NM i_ _ - ..- ' -. _"'i`.'_-•-- _ � .�i _. - - �a ,,. - .k s I. - "•Ili' __ a `_ — ,�"`�» t 4 sus+ i • iiip } Y _._„�,— r- ter-7- 1 . II i • 4. • - 4 • i . ., , V 1,- .� Aa , IW ,7 t a 1IIIIV 1 , ' 1 ' ' • • * e us it 4'- .awas, , '' -*a; I:' "8" 4 7 1 _. _ st . rilliPillitill ' 1 el 4,,, ',. ," i. , ,„ tr R- z ; , -, , c it � ....4„, � a I � * �� ,\ . i /•I� . =' ' , ` i r. RAltai. , t..„.., I W, a ',�+ �Y -+' '! • .. . __ C - , . . .... . i s e I .......ii• ' r * k - : L - ) 4 al . t :16i C 1, 9. ' 4 ! C., •.* A - t LA 1 • At AIM! ' rill / r • f a •rlt �Ilk lb , y 6.,t 1 . • r • ..„ .., • 'lilt l'.ili iii,, t, I ,e41 , 0, i , - . I ... III t il i . ' - N 1.. . 110. t tr . , - . . iiiii, ii. '): ' ' 10,••••••, - i•••. ,I ar. ii ..„,.' .,, „. , I ii IC,' _.. . it '-4%,..jii l'r ;,‘ .,, $ s 3 1' f \ ' . - 1_, I _ 1 II/ .„/ .•,-,. * $11/40111101.4 . ' 1 4 • ' r t 1 :s• • It a Slip r • .r• / -�— 1 I fffige, _ .. _ _ r' _ • -- - \ .__ p. ' 'i . 11 { P • �Y� t' _ Ij - (f/ _\ I _ } am. FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes _ �..I� i �$ Other �rl b Side x Pedestrian (wI� ''r ,r EEO Short Tenn Raised MedianDriveway Consolidate O Signalized Intersections SCALE 1 200' Dapar(rrnnt 0 Y 2r r-HiII GUNDA t, JACOBS aTnnapwralan _Medium Term Raised Median_� Right Left Bicyclist �' AllerNalle �� pssaciaies inc. �.,........... County Boundaries _Long Term Raised Median City Boundaries - - Pea rl a n d 2 l ---''y ailab. Rear End Headon Faed Obi - - "-" 1 - t " jib_ 1 At .. Area Statistics 1° t' ti ti1,4 i Total crashes Ha I • ! .._.( 111 ) aril - i •� I *4 ........, Crashes per mile 36 R * , '� i ai. ,,.�_, = Goal driveway density per mile 30 • Total driveway density per mile 16 .4 " .f. . •_ ** I Dnveway density per male EB t t 4r I • I', Dnveway density per mile WB i" • Driveway density ratio 053 I 1 II I 4 f ii lr # j gag _ !."m n 1 3 t w 4 ,. .\ 1 * r ._-ii:;P .: _ ". ,-. ; ' ' R4 K 1.-A'. ._.,,"- ,::ta•...,-' e:-t;. ,i I:41.*r 1 .. . Vt \) M .._ r' %.114 t• W4gitir II r.- . _ . _ ,. - .-„, 4 t s r _ I . ' 14.4 Lik, .►. , 1,'Y, - I•4 ., f on Y r to • s y * �I 4 -4. Sj' • 11 ., i I •. 11 711 "ti- VW. T •i +1 { yu y • 1 Y {i .1► ' . O * A t - R. • S. • L^ It ! _, • ,, . s , ' 1 t r r to ' .. , t JJ w , 104 - At. . ' 4. ,i -: - _ " Zt� s I ' IN ' TT , .• IR ., , ‘,air"' a to ...4, s 1, \' If , r j s a ` I It' Y ` t Ir1 •1 • A. r A ' � 1,... -111.- , ;I: ,- —II" ; � .p t 144. 111‘, I 0 1 I ."; r E ... 04.4101, . illsoirsrs i tt. s., 4 .,-,' _ , - '.I it, ''. to, llit_ 1 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN r y Legend Crashes — -- -T_J l ; Short Term Raised Median ® Driveway Consolidate it Signalized Intersections . Other eitikt. Side x Pedestrian --• reran SCALE 1"=200' ��^ Kirdey-Horn GUXD� <,{� ,o.pwtrwrt _Medium Term Raised Median Right Left Bicyclist \ 1 and Associates,Inc faal��mn JACOBS prr '• --•—CountyBoundaries oCityBoundarLes g i "-' Long Term Raised Median volimbio Rear End 41$ Headon 4 FixedObj Pearland 3 - -1 1111P07 I I —r j` Area Statistics Total crashes 84 I I. Crashes per mile 36 j 11 II �. ( Goal driveway density per mile 30 Total driveway density per mile 16 Driveway density per mile EB 7 ' , I �— Driveway density per mile WB 9 Driveway density ratio 0 53 . liCs.....' I - - r seemI II T 9 1 t;',-_- i ..I .. IR --1 • *... . ir '' 4 Joi•,ii, ' - '-'. 'V, ' 11111.11111, Ok 1 .. ° �..I.•�,•. • I t !rise- —� I w,i. ! I r°. r . v ! f. ,. T:: —� . . or or T- J11i ', ��{ '�° ss may .. 4111#01111111 ro Ilet f. , I ` ' �.Y I .11 A • IIfa ti 'l d 1.1 + r -2 ii II l• . • . , I 11 -._ 'a •• I i..._• a illiWe . L--1 _____ 1 IMM ' tor 4 i I• *f • - 1vommoommin w 1 - ' IF Broadway(FM 5 8) L. r. vw 4 , x 1. � fit_ : . 41 \ . 1 I `. s . .. I 11 4 .." f'. - 4- � 4. . ♦ c. ll y ' • ' ' ••J ••�rI ` _i••i • . o • 411 r aft • , :` • 2 : y r �i• t I - • L � j... ___ , x a t 4•x r � �{ • : . r . r + t ati w. , • •' }� 7 - — 9 }1 44 • r*° '. ly; • •�iCo ..+ i''/V". , '' Y } t� x/ ♦ 7�4 4 � � `41i '°1 r y ` .ter 1:I.' 1, , , i It . • mrr • r _ ; -_` " it )4`Ali. i .. �`. f:•,'. r!�'1 - *lit- ,, �, l.'�_ y•� r '�♦' a d t EK[fiTtu Lams - �, 1,,�: ,r, ry+ a1 • .r „ '" Rf� PROPOSE° *CRT RN70E wIwtaE l 1 �� • r N tr!(1 . - t _ -' _ ,* • ` - PROPOSED P iiM R+ 4 [IPROYEIQtT I 't • •+� _ -, t z - 'a �., sip - E E • FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes _pv) Short Term Raised Median Other Side A Pedestrian d } Texas � Driveway Consoldate Signalized Intersections (�N) ��° _ I M Krney+lorn •CUNDA 4 Department �Medium Term Raised Median___CountyBoundaries Right Lett # Bicyclist \�� and 0.ssociates,Inc � ,�• ` .IArr�$ �rr.nzporr.emnCdyBOundaries _Long Terre Raised Median Rear End Headon 4 Fixed Obi SCALE f=200' Pearland 4 ..... I . . ‘'',,A i• ' . '-' --- - — — r .fit ea ics T ' Statist' ' a �� - e Total crashes — — a • .01, , 59 0,.. Crashes r nn le 41.1 129 y Goal driveway dcnsit� per nick 1) j K - Total driveway density per 3U Driveway dense mile 37 NINIM I t 1______________aft . r ,, r It 4 £. II $ ,, , e as Driveway density per mile WB 20 >s ;_ I -? ' • A. �, tr Drivewa density ratio 17»� 1 ill: »- _, — i I ------i 1 1 ra 101.4 ''Pt 'illn r 0411 - . - . 1 ea it t w . IItali. 1 :! 441, rVIP .11 O f ...- +. ^ f _ w _ _ a '°. sss+ '"`T�'.._a..�.•e.•.....ti. �ii�la — ...r..r+,._._.r _ . __..... -16 au - ....; _ - I 1 _—ram---a m. iii ,..; -sti : 1 I di, JJE .. yr 7 ,.. . . ii, *V '',4 4 24 . . N., - ilk14. 'g,t11 1i j tr i IL ittimmi t ie rrlw�r.— El `" �' st . - • to • mll�rtT• f• t' �+ I Fii - s I r y t ",,.Ilt 1 J ,� Iii 51 'e lA$ . S. �w _ I illit * ' - #t s f� . .jr i ipa 1C r '.x 1 e -firr • i i !...0, I • •X i FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN tie! i 4. r 1 1 t ' * , ';1° " i « f i C..C� �Mey Han -- Legend -° (iU\UA Texas Crashes and Associates,Inc ��.o.,,,o,.,.- r'' JACOBS f rMna�r enr ININShort Term Raised Median a'n»n.'pa.t,.reo„ ® Driveway Consolidate _Medium Term Raised Median it Signalized Intersections Other viifb Side County Boundaries Fedestrgn ^" ®Long Term Raised Medan Q C ty Boundaries Right Lek Bicyclist 4 Rear End Headon FaedObi Scale 1��_ aoo Pearland 5 • �` ,, '4t....1., 7' ' >'.� ti s * Area Statistics �j •tin✓ !" �'' `; 7 ,; ., r x r�H,_�; - t '`i -i .' ' Total crashes 129 tir'-,, -, r �#'.0-PA 1 04 •. PI! 4llr ,.Io' . liatbx ��y 4.____ Crashes per mile 59•101 ' A• r :i�,. rNt . - , *• T ,, �� Goal driveway density per mile 374111 �3►T i ar • .,' ~ r �. - • t ► .s Total driveway density per mile 37"��?. „ ,es s ' - •.r 1" �; Ake ♦ p "1 t Dm'eway density per mde EB 20 f "k' ` . •r` Driveway density per mile WB17 i� isIli -r .. , 7 , ,F-, zIlle • �% `1 Driveway density ratio 1.2�1fIs I _ ' r% r , w .�, ,. * 1 rt Ir Fu 518►r.f. I r.`>*r '- 1 • t.i►♦.ram '• � �'+�'t' i.� • f.a'z �} , �, • • f .. or ii !•00,,X Av.' , ..41111.&;_fir; 4- ,4.• .11- ' —Ft OP'. ft - r- • - „1"'"4• - -Ilk.‘k\ ' -1 y 1 . . _ ,,..,..., . , ......„. 0, • ..„_.. .+r ., �_ �. ,r x t *ems �• ,�f,' r�,,, , 'i 414..+4 ,x f. �� ; ''tR- - - .et '1 1,:�' Ar -1,- r^ 4 ' _ Jr X. ,."1__r liv,' r t * I I \ib. t �. 5 1 , '721 • a. • . ♦ • d• -- w _ ••'' 4 • --- Existing Lanes - s.•} . Y Propas�d Short Ranq� [mpravamant r 44,6 r� . ,-� � _ � Proposal M6aiL.Yt1 Runge Improvement i gr � �` r �`. � ,1= a ♦1, t.j 1^ F` J iial z * g I- ` • 1:11-.. .41 is MINIM! I I k I T •. ._ . ..,.. ,..,,,.. ., ,,..,. ... . _,,,, ..... , . , _..,. ., Z` Wia 4.1 w.r•.+ s• t ! "Now .fr • ...:... -.sue-.-..r_.._-_.. .,, • ,{� ......,-. a•"w.mws.�•'•'+'.'^'.,.'.`♦ - - • , `. _✓i s I`�Q - 4 >reeet.�' .,:,.t- a z<_l �r �Y ••y.�.+�r ---• r T., e4 �z.-, ,_- a swr .3 wo 4 ` ' il -`- 0. *°°‘ N '' .--`11- •I rk. ' , 0.x� t fr tea6mimi \ — i r Alp 41, agifilE— • t\ i . rilha 1,, . ,.si. , 1 , . 1 , , . . .... • , ,,,,k I\ . -. _.,,.. -- 1 _ I I— , _ ramitio I- . .. , , , , .� E ' :.•"1: II V' • r a F 6 viows ,„ , , \ ,. I * s k . .. I h i — . Id tiMell F s FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLANLegend crashes -.. - o, A . Other . Side ,t Pedestrian `� �s I__ racaa Short Term Raised Median • Drneway Consolidate Signaled Intersections N — Kinley+lun �,GUNDK JACOBS Air renapor.ion Medium Term Raised Median moms County BoundariesRight Left . Bicyclist - GPI, andAssalales,Inc _Long Term Raised Median n City Boundar es b Rear End sal Headon . FuedObi Scale =zoo, Pearland 6 "•`• 1 44, Ift— I I I _ Area Statistics �j, Total crashes 141 11 ____—_ . II Oar Y I Crashes per mile 80 ' I -- 1 r Coal driveway dcnsit. per mile 30 �— I I i Total driveway densit per mile 59 Dine` s I mileEB 0 �— I Du) a} density per nle EB 1 ; _ I I e�sa� density per 29 J , - _ ;. . . .^ I •, , ril. _____- Driveway density ratio 1.96 — \ I -., . ,r, r +5 • �! A • — 'fit I - r•I "' it I i " I--, ....1111\4: 4- ji-i iiikr:1;.- it 01, I .____:* --1 1 ' ,.. I ro ...: . _ Qt.. at • y L ________,----- 1: 1134' 'v.': it - I I ti *at Ilk rI tql i goti z L— ...- 4. i • i . ill I_ IIMO I I r I LLimaiLliffilissiiip, i tr... i 3 1 sire - — L — - _ -- -- l ..,. • ... Y w r P as ,w. I I I I I 1 / - 1#11 1 i a ( I ._' ' S Alf � L .r . 4111 I am•- I iiiiR 1 r li 11/i'a _ L► ,� , * --; "---. ------:----1 . 1 r 1 [___________A-----. - I I ` 1 I---- --i - -I : :: ‘. r I I 11 1 11 ( - �Y ; sir 6 II 4 4! ......1 'kir t t.' i4111Cik1. - . ! , _../2.4 III& Iiii ' ' I , I L ti Legend Crashes _ FM S 18 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN ITexas ♦ Other �iiy SidePedestrian N � a e Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consolidate iiii Signalized Intersections c...^ Kirtiry+lun (;U\DA JACOBS ,Transpi8n° I=Medium Term Raised Median___County Boundaries I-1 City Right Left Bicyclist[.� andAssceiates.Inc 0,(,.,.,,«� - of Department f 'Ci Boundaries I I Long Term Raised Median' +d=} Rear End Headon Fixed Obj SCALE ,��=zoo .,... Pearland 7 _ Area Statistics i , y•• ~t k ! L + • Total crashes 141 F :T ' fe, h . ,1 =y f. , r a, , Crashesr mile 80 L . . - r ri.. " �r•`r r ,r • ; ti~� Goal driveway density per mile 30 I. '"w �+ 4 ' A. Total driveway density per mile 59 Y. , '" • Driveway densityper mile EB 30 I : - , #� LL �I/ • %' ' Dnveway density per mile WB 29 -• _ . ' r Dnve� densityratio 1 _ -a� 196 FM 4L8 . T t, . - 4. 4 1 01 i rI f+ - 4 44 p Y , t- all 1 j�[!'�' �'. 1 t °11 i 11s • 4;.... irr # 4 ., IL ,,1 A 4 I i i • „ , eu • ExlSTING LAMS 4 4Y .4.."' . i •. �� r" ? r «. { . , • 41 . .... PROPOSED SttORT RANGE I fI YEFfNT • —�' ; '`` `� .l . r. •' * •� 1,1 PROPOSED rEOIVM RANGE (I?RQvEt�NT • Y f "� �' '.. Li $ I , M �1114 i , 1 ,04in. j{ • ;, •• i i • w,4-,,,.4,aars-. 0 i !IL 1 lawwml i'" ` li --' . r IlliCL. .as 1 5 ;', 1 '1tILw * J • iiit "i I t • r / 1/ tr, ..,1 4114 Broadway(FA+I S18) re sV;I w o � w ' 11 t'iti."*_ » •.. _ t 'a : � _ �— µ ._.. illtnr _-. 11, 4F0 .•.+•� r"'�""�- . -;. _.._.. - �+ � � a— ' -•. yr� '�7 f o to O >� t-.• l' ri 1 , �_ Y J r .,9 . P , _........._ .- . 4 ♦ 11' NMI . a it- . ii) 1 , ,...*- 'L ., fit . I:: jp4.11 OP 0 I )1". ki if ., ,• . i ' r, 1 o IP $ \Id 1 ' - t }1 ! c di .. / . , I . .,401.41, k 1 LW col, is *'. 4 • , .4 yr ililik i i ..- 3 • t I ,- 1 i 4 i ft 14 -.! , _ ii , ....4. , . . - i. -T �I I I = . woo,„,,., . imiu m I . 1 -- 1 _L _- 1-__._ -11 '•- _ . .. t a` • ` Y - - m Josephine — —�� —1— • iI s , , _ - .20,- .0.41.' -- ----4, ki 1.„ 1 1 i 1 -. . . .... _ _ lf"isogir , 4 1 f4 1 i r. . A. ' " 11 It 7,1 ' 1, 1 '. 7 - . 1 1 Icy._ .:, \ .. te— s'---- tir.. jr411;1:14411,, . ii, 4-I' I__ .-: ill '•'Ii t A/1y? '" Y a w • . • " Q - : 1. • ;. 11. tit...7w- Amot." $ I --7.- ..-7:--I ' iiiiiiLail ". . Ili'I' I 'L.... --..- -- - s... 04/6;snosiot ' i 171 i ' .1 le m.. ; I. riZi. ..,I L ',s,'„s I .41..,-1 1 , -_ 1 , 1At i '—..' II. -* .. .r,' -llzI..D.1.,., _4. JP _____ . 11M411041-ri _ r f .l l :. a 1 t . . 4_ qlik S I ‘;'°•itrw , a eil Legend Crashes .�. FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN x r-74. Other Side Pedestrian I . l !!Short Term Raised Median Q Driveway Consolidate ICI Signalized Intersections "' rCimley+lan CUNDADepartrnent Teccas M„ and Assaiaes,Inc • UN A JACOBS I:Transportation Medium Term Raised Median _„_County Boundaries City Boundaries R ght Left Bicydist 'Pd'""� _Long Term Raised Median .0* Rear End Headon 4 Fixed Obj SCALE 1"=200' Pearland 8 l --_ �� 'pf f i - it Area Statistics R to,,,, , Total crashes 14 1 ♦ t �, • .� �€ ! # P �� Crashes per mile 80 Ili { i a ;.!j fi , — Goal elris car ay density per mile 3p ,, ,,� ,er r . . r PM ._:Xi,ram �- Total drneway density per mile 59 jor t i . Pill, ---* .. ....•✓ , I ar 3 Ili -', a . Driveway density per mile EB 30 --, , r.. —ea— — " •�," �__ `, _ .. .- ^T f a 4F '� 04 Dn\e ay density per mile WB 29 Ai 3-, �.r •, + i _p Driveway Denstt} Ratio1.96 4 -- [----- i -4rt.r—r---'Iiiimp0 1 li I i'' iti.. '4 "-"", 61,...,.' 1 -'Al11116. 14111----1:N M1P I i. . H I ,il le , .. I : 4 iliwei. I 1" lid �it�. ar I l # ,/itri4 1, -----1 -FN.' _ •:7-7.2.• 1 II RR * rr • • J. • c Sotx ' ; I •I i 11171 4 • f. .,. k II — n _ , - 4 4, ii,1*6 , ' i H . . , , , so,, 1-- ,N. ,. 2 , .2,24 r as .r _ . -- - its _ " t • '.• rig t• Ifri ` - m I� I r2 t t, Ir— cas .. _ 4 '- PI.....j as i . ..„,A F t III iiii..*...............mobial.1114.44/11 ' atill' i . Tik: I II l , .rid' I 1 ,q -, if FI it i ,. . 'I _- ;r. so f 44 s. Ye i - j. J 91 t�.`. 1 ! ! a 't, 1/..J,a I IY- -.... -�® 1 •.- ., T. _ . ...........1 ^1 ". , I) , f. 1 :A 3) —j:, ..jp 1111__ Ix-, I ... - it • _ ...0 cadio,it... ,..,,:, _ t , , . . 4 - = t2j i ! ! t t ._________,.., . ii . • .. , i k I _........__ .� _ 13 �� e, '4 . . -illir.,... •-..,.• -** / i ...... '" ..,,Ati I d i.i.6.4 At ; lI 114 ,r in.r - ` ./ 1:11-' i: .4 r , ...___ — v t Fla 5l8 ` n I 4 i �e P. * i, -15. 16 I # .r>wrw rl A__ ___ 1 *. r +ill. T r • 1 --/--- t_- - • - �1 - • IL I I (i F iggliCA41 _ I5r'� IN I I ,.. S _ iP ExistmG Limes I _ IMAW I i - PRLp0566 SHART RANGE [PtPfiAlfiDEMT t 41 _ f41'- ! s _ PROPOSED l6t1[t!d iN(?ROYftaEHT I iRr,ex� Legend Crashes — I FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLANOther Side A Pedestrian J Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consolidate Signaled Intersections t . 1 Kintey+lan , fDn_it _Medium Term Raised Median-__County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist �, `(, N . v at Transportation n City Boundaries C and Associates,Inc. I.Long Term Raised Median I — Bike/Pedestrian Facility "�'bl Rear End bif$ Headon Fixed Obi SCALE 1 200' Pearl an d 9 ., !zi- '‘,. _ ---11` •.• i' i_. 1 -- i k - ' - r___I .1 r_t_____, • , \ — Ici _ it ' I — — I t, ' Area Statistics 77 MI 7-7- 1 I 7 - , Total crashes 141 ) MI- 1 • I • 1 __, r_ ___ _, _k ----1 L i_._di,i, ,__________:___ --4, \ L M 1 1 , --_,--s Crashes per mile 80 1 1 I 1 I'LL_ a _ ___.... - , r- , ._ . s, [...._ _ . • Goal driveway density per mile 30 II I I I .:_L_ I__ I.1 -1.-- --- - -r._ - r - 1_ I____—. i __----- H , _ . . r__ Total driveway density per mile 59 MI' I lir ---1 I— i . _......... — _ - --a.' 1----\ Driveway denstt)per mile EB 30 , le i n, _._jr _ r _ .; ____ 1-- _ _ . ..7.1 1 _ ____ ,__.. - IC-- H --\, 1.......doirs. , • -. . ____. „,, .-1--- 1- sr Dnveway density per mtle WB 29 1------- .., E_ — — -, • Driveway density ratio I 96 _ .....- - ___,..i...;_‘ - , . ____ _ __, 1___ _, r____ ,,, ,.... . ,, -1--30,---i ii i __ i --i--- • , _OIL 1..-- 1 ILL -INC11.11 \ • l-- L L . .. L. - ' _- -----I . ___---- ..- ______. -- -------------- - --1 . _gaga .4), - -"1 iikiliLliertimist _ il 7- - /.1 ..___ - ' li ,-, 'N __ -4---""--:--- Patil! ti. .ivoi Egaimissi tilli ,.. __1 r____... - , -4‘ \ ' . : . ' I 1.1.1.1141 - l . - .. ' / I-- ea- 1 --.-----i . -- - ' . ---- --1- _, % % \ .-- '40 ., [--;- _1 „.......__ -- r--,---- r , ___, , , .. •_____;••_, , ____, _••••.:_.. p _ ___ _ , __— I 7----- \ ., , r - •• _____ -- sr h________ ' iFiLT ' r-T-- I 1 , '1. , IMO .41 IS 4 . '' I I I . . . _ Ji - i III I , . - s - -.. ----,-- 111111!1 * ' 4.h.l . iJi • ' 4 ,-,r ..1.„ •-lir gig 0 4.1 AI ±j .. ', . ' ‘;44111LilalieLv.11. imti g •114 1 [-- I I a. .- ... 1 6 • _ , •4 14 0 4.111111W, . ,,,_.11111111S-1 r a .411 — , • illisillittg‘- ti • AI Asol, 4,, L.., __ __....__.1 L -_, .- .4. - • 1144 -1, • lika „*7-, , Cherry - 1 E.-3 MTn: 11 7-11 Mil li A ., 1 ,,, ___----- - \ . -- — -11 [-___ ._------..--7 10 - .' i - A If ' ililimsr. _ -.I # 1-7r ....!1. — - sifr - ' I 1 ill 11---7--- .:1 , ..-- .____ — I - --- ----T- ._-. - -1, log . • . , III tit . 1,if , oftril - _....r- --'1,-*'Ir 1 I r OP . _ 1 i L I I i___I---1 -1 -,• ,.......-- ,., ;WWI [__ '1 ; iii* . -- _ -- --4 --"' ', --\ ' . . , .. • * ...-------- -....-•---' 1.- 1-11J-J-- I I 4.- .•...-. ----1 I --irli a, ..- — _ 1 4 , _ —__1, r ,____, iiiirr_ • ____, . , e, ..., . ...._...4. , . ,. . co ri._ _ r 1 i — , toir , > —A—c-__ .—_ _ •_ . I - — [__-_-_--- -- -1 l''',,, \ - , r- IC` ..ik - _- , 1_..______________,_il 1___... -_: Ilirt--: ... ._, ._____, _ 4, __....... 1 1 , ND _ = 1-- . H ,11 .____ r.____ ••t-- \ • N H -.7.. ...0 . .0 IS 1 -' I .1 1-11______-1 I i_._ I- -__"1 F_ — --I __-1 —H , r--__-1 _--__1 ,„.. \ _ ,__-- ,____.__ 1 _ . • .., _ ,, L__. _ .. ...., kjill I-I__ 1--- • r---. 1 'i, .., , , 1, - H---- • i 1-_-- - _ • i),.- - -3IF -401111% 4,4 , - ..-. _- -- • — , „. i t! l• '- 1---- - -T 1--. ' ______, , r___.-- _r_ --. 1 I i_____---1 1-- .- P ' _____ tTF __I I 1- -- i- - --] - — - .- III „..1.01' — --r ,. I . -1_, - , I i t , ____ t--.. , _______—__1 1---- ___AL.w. __ ,......... _ dt 11 I - .;..,• , iii .- — -- - F_ ______,,, % I -, . . _ _______ • _- . ... .... _ _ i_,.... ...,• - _L-t____,‘"i. , _ .4 _ ----] _____Thl ' 1 ----- — - ,I________ - . L - , . i.. -'1111114: i e _____ — •.._ ',, '"1 - ' ' lit" ti I • t - ^ ort. rii.:,t, ' I .141 litiL ipaioricioil7 10.111116. . l' 4,• . i. ' ' • 1 I —, II • I ' -- --] 'illirrilli**. I F___ _____•_=I *-• — .., ..•• . ,,. Legend Crashes FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN * --sit• 1••••Short Term Raised Median 4111 Driveway Consolidate it Signalized Intersections 46141. Other mai& Side . Pest,[an ..._„......--- ..nyi..., .... .-,.. - Tem ' I Viiin Ka=tes,Ira 15 Lial?./1. * JACOBS ZrnampoZ.nt , 11111.Medium Term Raised Median*veer.County Boundaries 1-1 City Boundaries Right Left BIC,/C St' „ Eli Long Term Raised Median Rear End eillikt. Headon I. F ix ed Obi SCALE 1"=200' Pearland 10 .. , ,,_. II 111 — � '� e•�l+ w • Area Statistics i • —-i - �",+ r. . ti mow. — }' 7 Total crashes 101 s o 1 - - .. ; _fir J I Crashes per mile 67 4 I, CI _ �— - ;i. ..R r_..__—_, ; \Aft._ Goal drt�eway density per mile 30 14 mi 'al .4roal r�� -�- I— _� Total drivewaydensityper mile 65 —I t_^—=-I '�• _ —1 Driveway density per mile I B 31 •I (_ -. �— I Driveway density per mile WB34 liril - ? — ---._ sib — H 1 Dmeway Density Ratio 2 16 �.. $� _ pp _ �. ,...... t ••► - C _ -_ Existing conflict points 1,536 in. iiies- - 1 , ; . - �_ _ --� i ' FM Ste Proposed conflict points 200 ___I LI') — _I — i r , .. Ala I I i 4 4 _____ _ , ' '..1______1._--i : r_________1 eir... It �� - --� r 7 F- t 1 j ,,l< 1 I, 1 11� t 411 Mt 1 ir , H __ .-�• ' • sue ►....•. ¢ Ti ' I } ExisnKc LANES I. L' I '' PROPOSED +Dar Rwr,X t mwrovEotimr 'ii{ , ��I b. ' Vilrl_ PaoPoss� eDtu, IEIIrI M .•ir 011 II 1• • s ' .' •Iry '•! I! __.fir. '_ -� - - - Mf" ' I - IV oft. _▪ _____ _,----_-__---ir--=-Alr- - .- 49.•t..I._,.,,..Le ah...e.. ....1- . r"--;-0 - -, r • ' .- -.1 I [ -,, - „fr., .... . • f ill istilvialt 4 1 1\_•i• - Asaiw.. 0 ....... —I 1 sa1ifial i PillotLitillaila ik, JIIiitli A 4 'A. 1 1 1I ' i 110 - ! sari Cikais• 7-----111H, le- al "411111111111111"..tig 0,4E4 14. '-',••4,,, --- 1 I _ il -7 _ ..J1 ., r . ,-4 ,lifir 4 `"k,,..... ----- Ciii ., ., it ! , sii: - gra iii 11111111.41t 4444% ."•••11/. . AI& , . lier. A I le I \ 11' — MONO# _ {,a t �, _ �:`Fti to 11i 't'� ' k^ al-go iii - - , ,, -- • + Ci3 1 qi • ''' :, a 6......) L _ , • , , , tit ,'�u r ift ail, ` I Oii,, . . 40,1' , , gift . L....'‘_LI_aak...Limgmakimis , M $ mow. . • q I aNnommll i , ?` I1 1 I .. Li +� fil ® • ' ` 11 FM 518 ` r 4-. ili __, — 1 I r IIMI = r I 9 • ,. Li* • 4ft IEH_ i _ , i 1 1 ... I ,_ .. . ) 1. .... . --1 , _ , --m. 11))I I( N .1 „........ , f ii,. 3. t_ .... 1 t 1----- i114,1‘...,. an" i ' — ----1 . . 4.-. . „ill& .00 • ' i , j , -Hi L-_-, . 's_ r.— ---1 . ...... . '.4 .. . ' 1 - PROPOSED SHORT R•irGE [hPfi3vEFENTi .... —-- EXESTIPC LAMES — r 4-• , , ioit. , . t. • ' . • 4 PROPOSED t£DCLH Rr,Fil� [hf'AQI!£16�r •- I , I 64 . I t • •a Legend Crashes I Kirne+lo n ACCESS PLAN 1`^ -) dyb Other Side x Pedestrian " ._ FM 51 8 CORRIDOR : Short Term Raised Median Dnveway Consolrciate Signalized Intersections tt' '-m- ;` +••� , IA -_ I' I1" i GU\,DA Texas _Medium Term Raised Median—__County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist I -}it it .�—+—+t � .,®,� , JACOBS , "° n City Boundaries ,_.. C��, 0.ssoclsles Inc o/ranapon■non _Long Terre Raised Median 1 0014 Rear End Headon 4. Fixed obi SCALE =zoo Pearland 11 I • c i� -w ... .i . „ Statistics • ! rt �. . / i I h 1(11 r y s � t IMA �� r / '`... v �► . Jtl * ,� Total crxs es f, '��, tyr I • I ' ` :"1 r< JI� � Crashes per mile 67 I •�� 1.11glit �`- ��, - .�'`* ,• \. >'a Aii r ; Goal driveway density per mile all •a f t '�= . y 1. f . .ri ,�, # y�tx ' f Total driveway density per mile Gi :. 1r , # \. ;j �: •/' 1` 1 �.R �dn !' Y n Pe 31 ;, s Dnvewa denst r mile EB 47 4 �_ . !� ►► t , Driveway density per mile WB `x rA* #' i 4 / . 1 r Driveway Density Ratio 2.16 y -4' _ I, 1 I._ , - ..1., zeil'‘ , . - 1 11: O' s k ♦ �: ,�r ` � tri '. / ,fir • / /f dA. i. • , A ., F . . , '",,„ 1 .' //fr/ ?- . 1411 if i 111..//"., 7t- •%,• Z. ..., ... * ,.. -.., ...A., to s .0. L, . a.� l1 f •-, Nii (18/ /1 -......,....„ / .' .4.1 - ''''' . . i , ,tit , , i ...k - 4, ,,,4 r r � ...1 aims eZE ~ - t .• J ,ir J / la ♦ / wit ' T ) 9,* ‘, - / : - : IIi',- .. 4 . .. A •• • lki " ( _ °e` 7/ 1 .r j �J a r. /14 . .1 .... _ , , / t J 1111 i / n 1 • f • ,fir ii1"-':',.. ' / ._ -- i1 j 0 't.+�# r. r • A. I / a 1t' 1' .., . 1 _ , ,/ ' - Vikill 4,°‘ ---..,,,,,, tr *Ai"' + ft '+ � r' / .. + Irk �.� Fr. r; , 1 - / As ."1 .711 ";' 4:t41141t... , . JAI: al t V f ti, C ,• E 1 #. it :rIrto / `r ♦� , i is is,...,„„t? / *., /11.14A ^ � * 1.--iiiii .,,, - . ., 16, . , k, Ak. s, 4. 4 ,,..../iym -- _ , ...* „..., ti..4..„f .. .. , /,,,,....,,, 4 * :". ,%ilk, { 't. 4t • .: ;1- 4. .- . i „.... 44.''‘...• t • i ( • i -.. S11 14' * ' f /:411w 1 'ak 4 if ''.•,„ , ••. 4114F ...II, • r . - 4'its* i „,,_ ,_, 4.4wit j.... IS aa. ea la of / AIi '1 in ' r "W.'il- '''' 11°114 ,., 11$0. ,` __ : :y4Ssifillkis -NT- ...•. 4, • • f r ? i v r • ly fit, --'41111P/ /1/1141I ://----- ' iJ , or � f • Aft ale • ` . /, •, . r/ .� ./ }} t .' r r t r ♦l 410 \/ t IIAA ' 4 Y r 6 �1 �' j' ,. i el, I • a • , • , , 4 • jf/f�//.� 11 t� •+ ',r 1f • �r ` //� .� •iSr t f . J/f/�/ ... FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes -� _ raas Other Side Pedestrian N •-. G I, crmleyaiorn i °T°1 JACOBS ,p•ftsportn Short Term Raised Median 0 DnvewayConsoldate gnalized Intersections and Asaiates.lnc or rrartsport•tion _Medium Term Raised Median Right Left Bicyclist ---County Boundaries n Crty Boundaries b.. _LongTermRaisedMedian F SCALE ,"=zoo Pearland 12 ielleitfi Rear_rid Headon Fixed Obi . f ♦ f y fi, r Area Statistics / •.' Total crashes 102 - if , ' . ' t Crashes per mile 35 / �, / ♦ .* `,� Goal driveway density per mile 30 ' • /` • Total drne��ay density per mile 11 • • • Dmeaa} dcnsm per Hole En 20 + , •t ♦ ♦ J► Driveway density"per mile WB 21 ' + +� y -" Driveway density ratio 1,38 / / ' . .\ ,." • • . • . 4 "*. ‘ of \,,,. / / i— - - - t ihil. . r / . . mi,, . .,,,, • • r. 1 R S • FM 618 / •''/ / iii7- 't''a --- f +► at ___ 1 r i T ))ir Net a / / $ . ' ,ir/ I -, � !.If ij. v ' s- �/ Ex[sT[rtG LANES �, aka ! .► r� r • w .`` 1 _- -- PROPOSED slicer RANGE [teliOVEHENr /• c� Jr • • • +. • T �_ PROPOSED m�EO[umti RANGE [rfPlirnrf e r . ...4 -\\\ - - _ . 11- d :- irk% 4.1'-. / ---...,. -... w s _ • ' .7s- ... — --.7.:-----: -; .....„.!- , . I 1*Ar I 4' ' ' .1:1:..'/'''' . ....,"2":"'"Alik•at j. .,, ewe , . . / t: • ..., , . . . .,. . . • _ : „.„..: -,..,, .7 , t •,. �'"'". try w' , , ... • .,,,...: '- _ • ' , 40/..-/ fr / ',..., . ... , ..,. ... .., z ...,..,._ ,.. i 1 , ;,. 41" 1114,1t— - T— ...— _. H..7- --4,.:' _.,::' , 11,4441. x. L `,. Kill001111111\ N r / \' ' 7 ', ..41' --e '''''-. • 41 . 41,1":„: f , . , 10°. • ,. ; u • r• •• i i • r- • • r / : ' • -a e . , ..v,///:// i ‘& ' : • . _ a" - : • + .../ r '. .I, I FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes - f�� Other .� Side � Pedestrian � ' N Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consolidate .Signalized Intersections • '•" 4"41. "^ :Tdie soctd G[J� , >, o.prmr.rn Medium Term Raised Median___County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist �. texas � I , andAuoci�es,Inc � - JACOBS �T •� tY r�CityBoundares I Long Term Raised Median .131li* Rear End .014 Headon * FixedObj SCALE 1•=200• Pearland 13 • ,., _ . ,.�r • , ' ' ., Area Statistics ' .. A ~ ...., r 't /' .. Total crashes 102 *� • •.1r9r190: 7- 4AfF. 2 . fl4 t* , •N, r, a` *_r Dnve��ay density per mule LB 7 20 I - �� F't Dme‘Na� densriti per mileR'B 21 - , AVIS"- - i /.. • • r../ ' lw r Dris-eway Density Ratio 1 38 . . ,,,,, (4, ' 8*4 III + `,1 +�' * «+ - " _ ,.:. ice,'-�,� '---' ilr, ig 44AL... i „e ,_N..illpir;,.,..4_, , , ,6 ar / '. *. .44a . V.4 et; 1 *- . di, , _, , 4_440 ' , -V ../ /" \ „ip • 'ell( 1 te A... . Oki - .. & N ..., vt.--' ff lop% 4,1:141 / : - . 7 .... • 4:4111 f , 114/ i -iii?' Oriii'7 :tel 1 4 yik -*Ili*I111; /AIL .tom lid ,. ilk se • 00 , . .... , -*// isit,. : 4,411)'\,,o.': 1 � r ... 41 idt jet NI'''. APP.F • \,\ : 44.41/1/ . , / 'ill , ! •di -1110 -11111%464 -7:-, • / -''4 ,. A ,411fr ' 44/ 417 4 r w - Is J . ` 't:e 0 * � i $ � ..- / ill':lir . " .. -jip. / • 22 / \ „ - li, •* ,•ti. .:11N,. %it. . lit• " ' \- 4 tot: -fkAN ,e; -I --", .... _ MY • ) Ic - 41111 all C A ; ,,,ar r - _ r •.4 . ..... \ . ... , ,} /CT I /44. Nii , ,0.041F,,,e0 I 1„. .,„,:- ,.. ,,,,, , • , . • r N. ' 1 \i/ , • - i ,... ___,_ g , 1 1 4 lipt,„„t, -.......\\ .. — �X ' '. f t j• ' — Al". .. �� 1 x -.. — PROPOSm SI4ORT RANGE IP•FROYEHENr \ f • r f i r PROPOSED AOCLel RANGE LFhRf3Y£EE?1T ' ` , •: r •. .• ' ! 4" ' 7 Legend Crashes FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN *- A ) 85 Other Side jj Pedestrian N -- . �J _„ Short Term Raised Median . Driveway Consolidate It Signalized Intersections ►' r C=I, ' G j . JACOBS ,,r,, Medium Term Raised Median ---County Boundaries 1 Crty Boundaries Right Left ' Bicyclist ..• Long Term Raised Median SCALE ,•=zoo. P e a rl a n d 14 ��, �$ Rear End Headon 4 Feed ON I T : - .or• `� ,, ,�';.. � ± 'T4F 1Fad 1. 5! PCrmIIe _r4 .. rvimill, ‘4 � ft 1.4 1* 7' s� - a i►. ' a i,i, _ i� 30 *a"`, . . i` ,f �4. � 4' .. „ _.�. ' Total drivels ay density per mile •1 r4to,, t l e •.. J�r ~'ill .,,:• �� 4 s j Dnveway density per mile EB 20 ' , , s �, v ,r a" li - I 6 _ Dnveway density per mile VVB ,� �' _ — Driveway density ratio 21 1 bra '' / ` � f 4 off' ., +y` .a ' C .+ } .. 1 . 7k 4 ,,e i ' - ilio Ag. . „0, .... . ... il N% , N,, . . • (141' s , - A VI.k .b.*- 1- IPI• I I 4 lip 07 1111:410: ' 11 . , , . ,:i .„. s.. 410 ,,,.a l §in ` I \ •• ii.. ' f1:4( r . -. ••• -- l' Ne Al 4 :- .- . I II S r — • A _ 11 /, J +rl it s0, 44 . *y i A- f r i- —I � \ - 1 • , 4Nr 4 ‘Sr.%, . .* •� ' cee a a i ,tea f , lik \ 4 cf:: :111461e '' ...-"": , �w • I • }, 4 \ \ tom` ` ,`'"<_ ' •� ; _ " T. h"t. �1 II �. r ,_ .,, . )11r: r .100 O ,. ... , 1,..i- . ..iiI,,.I ... -:.:, :7_II_ ,,,,. 1111.. _.,,,, ..., ,....,\ /lb/2:s ` a fJ Y e max_ 1 R < — J40 IN _. 4 lionri II / i r • rlr. r 1 r 1 r • / // f II 1 f^/ ,e , .i / /iN, / f 1 \ii . le 111 . / ' .0. 4.11:3' • . / ,.... /ow.. //..41 idoz, . , ..•:f1 K f /' • "��`fit : fr.. f 1 - a°, - N�j j••1,... '.,1:-`...„,„ „‘\\'\i_'i..:':-...„/...... , ''74:4::: ''''7". , „,‘,„\i‘..\\.'"//......\.4:/4. ...:-N.:. ,s--.:///.:••.-..:,:.'''‘4 i.1j.,'...:/-4 -,„//1': 1 4 // / f t O / 1 f tN fJ T j, 1, _ / /: s # — a • f ... s - 7,il-j er.,.'j i y� p ,._ ... _ , i\ „.. /' ',./.i/ ',.-,(' ..., 1/4‘, ..../ \'8'/- 44 141\..'i',/o'.-:,_:,•/..- .,'/.-t', ,a-.A...., 4.../.i•-. ,.74 1•,,! /\ r 4 _. Ai ,.tki A.trt. . ' `•. \ LJ i,4i�; '' J. /� was ie ^t lip. s e 4 / ,j/ /\ ,' ' / 1 x l = �y ! a'� ,. .,_ 1 4 ,,a, 41.00.,' . , ‘11, ) .„.. . ‘.,,,,.24.it,,,*, , . j ii,..,,,,,,, . • I FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN - Legend Crashes -- y Other e� Sde Pedestrian -- - A Short Term Raised Median Drivewa Consolidate Signalized Intersections t-- Texas — , �^ k dey Hrcn GUI t) oepartnenr _Medium Term Raised Medianemies County Boundaries C' Boundaries Right Left • Bicyclist CAI \ andAssaieles,lnc � _ JACOBS �ns�,rosmon _LongTermRaisedMedian m Pearland 15 Rear End Headon 4 Fixed Obj SCALE 1"=200' 4 j ' _ r - -�` '� R. •, x illif. . `� •, - Area Statistics ' ` -_ 4,040 1 ` } • Total crashes 102 I f I / . ) of / r.46 1 • Crashes per mile 35 .40 r ~. _ l ' I i . ,,,, !► , ' '�.� �� `- Jf Goal driveway density per mile 30 N. 1___l \ f ...` f "/ ,' ! ti �-- \,�` , / r ' Total driveway density per mile 41 • it; it * t ; *. \ # , Dnveway density per EB 20 I f ' / 2 3 \ �` Dnveway density per WB 21 l� �� Driveway density ratio 1 • lira. ' '' . '‘'‘.. 4 . .. . ith /,. it \\...-. )104;tr. • !fr_Hi '. ..,_ ,- - ,,, : . . , , -. • \11114•Is' .\. ‘1... . _ . .1.._ . . .. - 4... ., 4,, ‘ . .. .,..., A :;.. .._ _,,i . it. .. i „ • ..1„., - _ . _ . , ..... . • . J 'J : \\,' fil*tik.' NZ\ , • 4 './ ,./ ', i& - - / ►:� s• ter► I. / / • /.V . \ 1s i '. tir \`-\ • t . AN/ - ' i' ,��7� 1 I l26 � \ • ~• e.' --/ :-At.** . -, 11,7 L.L. /-N„ / 1 00..,-- -A. ---. , • • - :*SIP "40, ../ 7 -. — i •`.... .0 ii . 4.4 _ s _, . •-„ ,: - / ` i r I• --/ AF IV lirilit 1 • .',N., , ., / ...' ,/ / N\N / ' N'\ • .s- T• `` NI • •. 'l, . Akiiki441 , ♦ / of •� �� ► 4% I 4‘ 41% . AO 4-2,.. : :0, .1 ". ,ic \/.7. ,10,/4.‘ , ir \ 44.0 ,ilk 44 , - .4: —7. • / 2 • -,..,. Ny. / I/ iike44 , ,..,,,, ./(//_ • / / / ,L'' ' -,‘ i i ttil.' - • /1)1. 1/) .. 'ft:its::' ,./ / // , /1.7 / / . . '‘‘0 .... % . PIA. i. ii 41--- .411111S • / ' / / *-7------14 i , • / Ate . 7/4 :, . 1//41111%* ., /r/. „„ .,, , . 't_ -..._ \Ai,/ / .,,- AP.,, , I� . ,. , . _ ..• * °Ott t \\ 7 a ♦ 6 - . _ \� I 4 +•t. ate / / // •4.4400 .., , 'Io.,„ .. . , 4 14...?, / f 4!l, / • 04. ; * • /111,1P. 4 ---/ / 4r6 - , • I ' _ 7 '''. ' s. : i -- '1444•N # '• I s fai rillfi , ' Irf. . 1 ' AMY .• k• AO 4 ' 04,444&..:%s.... At 4. Ex[5i[NG L ES i R Y '� . �• 11011k0 .��,} PROPOSED SHORT 16rMaGE (IfROY091i , j `A • \ 4 , . .„ ,, ,,- `,. -PROPOSED FEDIUM Ri IIFROYErENT / • � li, -'.I Legend Crashes FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN r .� �s Other �s Size Pedestrian =' _ `�• Short Term Raised Median • Driveway Consolidate �� Signalized Intersections ►�e -•�' _r" �r cnt� _Medium Term Raised Median�,,,_Count Boundaries Right Left Bicyclistwe %S aI, G .IQC�s OM Long Term Raised Median y n City Boundaries Rear End Headon f Fixed Obt SCALE 1"=200' Pearland 16 / �t f ) jy Area SYxtistics //A ` I f r' / ,,, ". • Total crashes t2 ir 'S. / A j �141ti /'r +r • _ Crashes per mile 34 / / 1 f f -— _ ; ' . 1 Goal driN ew ay density per mile 30 r / } �, . — •R Total drive«ay density per mile 48 i f l t t� j . ,� r .�..... Driveway density per mile EB 21 i, f I /, f Driveway density per mile WB 27 „j r f f j i I �, / t Drip c«a�'density ratio 60 f1j • AI -411r i 11IF 1 } _ w -" ‹,.. /‘ / / „, / f :Sf#,,._ //J n + /„- ..*, \,., _ •• , ' `'- r • 'fir.' r . .� f . 0 teA ,.'. *.. r . sv, r f . / �1r I /f 4 • 7 f s \ , __ . ? 7. : :,: „ ....,r ' e 'ti. 1 ff// r` _. tea: _ f + • - ,- ^# r I .., 7 \ i I , / , ! ! ?of f .:1\. :::(../.: .4 it:: .: r. { J TT:1r-, wr � ` r • • R f tri i /�• -. 1, T T < -` 1 f 1 ` F .` .a l 11: . /44::-11411116‘41L' ir : w. e.4.- ' :-..-- N. k. , ,_.,,. , .,,,"7: . ..:\ ' el* // 6, --it._ I - :. ' '.4 I / , ' / / ' , 14 I,sue `. • A / 4/41,47- lie - :'1k v y, _ r"' t. ♦ �� mow! c c q //14,/?:,, r Se. - i iii ' „ \ „ ..., ,..... --..., . . / ,..„. i„.. , ICI"; :Ill, 1 . st. . . , . ,. . Allib7", i I iisidit,7 r ,, N i. , . _ • _ - .--_„.. , , ,N. •* r J." -44 4 i„ iewk .„ 4 '- ' . :/,:44.4.,y7.,, ilig- R ......i.,l' .,. Of x � 1 • .Y //1 Q , AN f l ; rf :41/-.....,.,',.,, ::.1 / 04 • _ 'Pr ,, . ,,„.. if : \,.. ,, , , , '4 („Alkk , f A 0°.%6+ . 0 VANti...,-,9 :),/ .71-,.: ,E..4 '. \447: • , 1 ( 11 04,,t , . , (/j 1 / 4.Nsis .).‘ osi i / A , i Nip\ 9 ...- , �A ,,,.. ,,,t„... . .N./ , ,.. , _......„1 , 7 \ • /1 /, • + Legend Crashes IFM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN - 4A Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consolidate a Signalized Intersections Other 41.115. Side ,t Pedestrian SCALE 1'=200' J DeP Texas KiMz Han GU\Dr\ or spaarirnent n City Boundaries R S T^ c JQCdBs _Medium Term Raised Median___County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist C�/� and Pssociates,Inc _Long Term Raised Median I6 Rear End Headon il Fixed Obj Pearland/Fnendswood 17 ,. ilir .. ri i Ns ipl A' f / /;r 010/. ``, 1i P Area Statistics f •_ Total crashes 42 / / / � � J '^ � •;� � Crashes per mile 3-1 �� SCALE ^=200' goal driveway density per mile 30 _ /� 461' Total driveway density per mde 48 ,•; Fnendswood 1$ Drt�ewaydensitypermileEB 21 f Jl Driveway density per mule WB 27 / No, l y Dnveir y density ratio f '_ f I s , 4v ' „, f a Ln • i/ r �W f f illb 1 * \'‘., R a �f . . t I r lairs iN:iis„. III 110ti., % 4 \ i . 4 '� • i • 4 �� ^! ► ate , 44 } • �! a _ f y e ••+ ,ate - �,l� Ir ,e4e44s.. `- !- ! ,�4,;; •r ,,ma 's. { i 1 'f f 4/ jr. 1 r • 11 / N. tt , / r . Nf,,,t6 i N41111.- : iti, 0 ,,,,- 1 a./..- - ..- • -, * .16, • v'-'-'21:'-' / . I:, :1''t L-74414 . r' t Y /ll / n r'. dr ....? ., , , 11 . /„/1. //// -: _ s., , . / -, / ----__ / / /....,,,,m ..*Ati: u 1IN Ili"' - f \ • ?; : 'x - ..4: 14. „.. , , , , ' N-e / - - Ns_ ,.. N —______ 4 „.. ,..„/ 'I \-' 4' N 4:11t -,- ., \,_ 'ti r . - ii•orit,--iN f/ , „.„.......fi.* . ..„.„,,,,,--- , . ......._ ... 1 N - ,... \\ _. . . .. , .., '''t 4 • := 777r r / �R I 1,, tip , It .. i > f i. ' ♦ a _ o - .. 00-/.. ' . N .,. 4 I. 1 f . YV t f* R • r • • e, 1. ,'�'� , ^, •. „'� /� t / 1 -_'^ �� tilt, ts . '� NY' "-v. x r �' w !s 4 _I! 1 �11 ,� �"' �" Ott . , ; • f . a s i J� � q q 1 `. t �' ._ �, :- 4� +, � if ' • % iiN Ile,...4% . ti I Legend Crashes -- ,, • # :. /Nw- Vic, % 4ttft-,,,,.\41./k`°., *I\ ,,„‘, -s. , `', '4 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN ' d� otter d� side A Pedestrian �—FE3 ♦ ,� + Tames Raised Median � Driveway Consolidate Signaled Intersections ♦ pl, Department Right Left • &cyc ist •,—+ � • G�I1 andAMaley+ian i G \DA JACOBS �rransporrdno Improvement Location 'County Boundaries 4 '/ arMAssoclAes Inc (�City Boundaries ,�, l t Rear End di* Headon Feed Ob r •4111P. 4,/,de Legend Crashes ��, Area Statistics ( � Other V� Side x Pedestrian FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN �Short Term Raised Median ® DiNeway Sgnalizedlntersedions Total crashes 64 I*44\s-' Tara, �` �' _Medium Term Raised Median Rght Left Bicyclist Crashes r mile R � o w,nnmr •®�County Boundaries ^C Boundar es l 1 �^ Kimev+lcrn GLTIDA l 1 k IL.., and Assocria es,Inc •W..�.. ..� _ JACOBS r rransportatoe _Long Term Raised Median vim Rear End bi$ Headon ill Fixed Obi �j * - ,�,, / Goal drweway-density per mile 30 r •',;( w • *+, r v► f �' �►' Total driveway density per mile 45 y �' • . /e / t" Dnveway density per mile EB 25 w +' -.. - - ~l 4 + J'�o x f,:< \ A t ` Dnveway density per mile WB 20 ,�, prr •. Ake - i r r •`� ti. , + Driveway density ratio / 1.50 R s µme_ k... 401/4: .. 4 ' -. - \ „../.. • . :— • alsi, %I< 'r -. ' o..#r , ... \ . %L.' `,•,/ / . , , tP. f r _ lji,or ;,i �' t► ► `,, f- / , , SCALE Friendswood 19 ..,„ .I- Ntit Sill ,r., A , 111$ , ffI,W., %- :,,,,I,i,-sll..i.'t 4y.4'1.r. , , l-.. 'it / 1 II i f 11- Pit + `' { Atl T'i? ' 4,1Ntir 7.4‘'i 1,04. om' Y c 41 / `1. r iiiiti • I * . 4 off/ ., I e S,,4 I. AC , 0 , 4../f-,* ,/ • .... . ,1"S . /Pt -, A , olp • __ - . .. . " .... ftv, 4040‘,. _ ilioto t.• ,..406 ..-N, -- \-. \. - • - \ ,t ,,./11. - • A,i Nosv... ..Aik.Nsakt,4 •-••\•• ',./ . \-..;:: . N . - ' v ''''4' a ` • ' ,, ..), .... N7 .Vfif ' • -.4' -.. 0110, - riiik.... • m ' - , ` • 2;(//, ' ... . ` ,,.. _ - " ti, .. / • L /f . IP ‘'\• . . . _ N. A r/ \.\-, * / 0: \ .kV . I '.. •4%. ' "IP(0.4:40 itit.„- A i '' • N -' / i ' f . .` r Tit .44/* , / #•.dor 11,111b.' 'Nee' . 4111114 ..., '01, '..... 7\ . I* • * t ,._ 44 fir,, . `�- \ ,./ to„, Allt 28 ..17 • , AP' 4' '''.• i<> 4, s.ks4 411.• \ - ' / 6 . \ / „, vt stk /4144\ 44...„. , •• . /aii, -„,.11111k„...... - / - . J. , lkiko:. I St • „lit . . 4. i )114, i..:' ' -.,. , .... , OP . - 4 EKI SIC NG LANES0 ef+ l A L 0 ..I - „.„,,.... PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IhPROYEtENr \ - PROPOSED 'CBE um RANGE thfROVE}ENT `` f ~ i. 'i : / •� i, �► \ >, A ♦ + '', . _� ` ' ' ��ea Statistics *� C" 'r• R ,�. ' A4.� v - Tutal crashes 6q ;d r ,i ``o ; !'f �! �` Crashes r mile 35 ' • ` r1.� k �, Goal (Iris ewa� density per mile • dam , ♦ f � • 1 1 p 30 fle/tit, i `t. ` !l�► `�` Total driveway density per mile qg I -.".it- . , .- ..�.. '�, �\ s.' , �i f ', llnveway density per mile EB 25 / ! i .. \s, i .^ �: { DnveHay density per mile WB 20 s {� '! 40 t f •;OP 'IJ �!' '� rRi Drne�ay denstri ratio 1.50 I-'41IN K . 0'# Oe, 4p N ,/ . N . ' * , %II.% ON r w 1r I4 f f' \NN '41 . , ' .:11c,‘ • •.;* "A. , lly A 4 iitikt: ' , . . .. , . % +VIVIP . \''1. % .:**' '16*kiN•1/0A,1.•tz,o...)%4..St / 4(Irl!if I l..(•,,/1i,/••/1\\7'/t-*..o• .,.5_-,j-*.l`.;..e••t;.'.4:-'.!... \.,,.('I.. V—\.,/•..ks.4\.,.. ♦ x s i r -. _ ; •ti J / < r . • yew J f ...L. -GAL i- E. T 22'- "A.\o'.C'.• .\'.N /\. ,f,A..'../N,-..‘,A.,\.4\1'., '.00.'N.'1,..4...•3„.1 pi1/4i.1,1 4:, \`�` � .. . 11 ! ' S 1 \ 1 �r„ - ,. e.A'r,,.I:',‘,-•—,, —A:.I1,.k."A-kkI*,^,t,it,,p*,,;„.v.,,'\s.-k.\..I.•N.'t.6 ,•eA 7 4.c1,.-.-,4,.e,l'"1k-1k:0'%\\Pi•..4 t,.-4..1.N.-d.-I.0„ .'4;.'l1r'lrX-i 6N°.f1.1Z-.t1.•,.,-.",,-.4\ ...o.,d`4,',.„.l.,i-V-p 4 1-k' ,...14•.,."-\..4i,, I N,./••S's'i-h.1, ,•..•4=k'..'„-...,'_/4•4 -..•t,7,.//•. ,\,i i-e',',.... ,_.... \-\ 0e\-..'/.4l),s-7 4-e„,....*,.,?.. . .,,.j.,\.-,t.._i'i_1_: .et,-4_.,. i. 6A'.•1...i...,,:6 ,-/'A:,0./.11‘a-1\"1 O. ..if..7. i. 1r. 0.\, l L 1 ,4 b • ,r. rr , k, f'f/i 1 y .• ' 11 \ e r ° t 7 tt ,, ,. _ ... . r. ....„ , ,. ..,\;,...., .. . . , •. . . .. ... . .„ ,„... 0 ,„,.. , ./ .... , .. . /4„4 ,,.. :\-„, . t .. r M _ r + J j c ' r , i IF"' j , , ,N g s l l ti i . i f i j f' . g l ,......, f ..,.. , • , (. ...,..- ., _ ....... . . bAjt-. .t. z.,,,,,.. - * \-,......-:,. / / , tN,v Ar,' \ - ' ,-,, , „ „.// „. , *OP' . ,, ' -- N. . #ff f/ e e" 1 r4.141t-. ill '4* ' IS' 1../ ",. ,".. - • AlF , fI*4 I ' * Al°L * • • . / \,- -�; , • I * . 4 : t - , i' sr -, .� ♦ _ �' #jam i, x I R + ® t \Vf/ i' '♦ ~ '� • ,\ if' l - -_ ''`R. �'I'�'. it ,.. � f��., . � ',ff, . �(�. .�_ ' • I i• � , \ .:.� ' it:..' r4l `� - \, ,f , fC . f , >4.;;I:N. A 0 -, '4:1/4' ,i, , - -Ilk .I, / _ � - d• \f K ..../..:\-....--17 �° �, fit ' it_ �.�a+� / .� _ �! 1 Legend Crashes Fnendswood 20 h ; 1,, _ f�, , FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN I f� ; �_ Other . Side / Pedestrian , ff Short Term Raised Median Q Driveway Consolidate GI Signaled Intersecbore1111(n1z;Han oa,annwr _Medium Term Raised Median R tit Left ! Bicyclist ! f' '4 I �, C,UNDA �rrrupae.Bon �++.County Boundaries 5Y i► \ '� and e,ro ies.Inc 4,-...A, JACOBS City Boundaries_long Term Raised Median {" 414 Rear End v�$ Headon Fixed Obj a �• ; - ( ik le Area Statistics ,� ' Total c '-'1:: ':4\-',.\ a 4 , P�. crashes 64 • , _ i F,; -- . ' lokikatiti., „4441,,„.,,,,,,,,,,, I Crashes per mile 35 i� ' Goal driveH a�'densih per mile all .°� �` \ t ittt. ,. p Total driveway density per mile 45 \' J / / 7 4, ., - , ` i ' dos,: . 'N' IDriveway denstt♦ per mile EB 25 € 4 JA `. I, III . Driveway density per mile WB 20 R ' 1.:. ', a "..-• 5�� DrtveR ay density ratio 1 50 r \ :`t ,,„.....//:" ...,,,i 11 ,..1 it o- � L f v f . e ,- fiiii r:411 . s 4 : , } I \ f I ,` / m. 9R*4. „, ,,,„ ,. / c . , , , . IpSO4, « As /*4;(‘ ....,,,,m,_ ,J , t,%,k _ , ,,,,. . ik 1� d ` 1 of 41 j I , 1, . . iteri„, 1,..0. is 7.. ri. ,,,,, .„, Pi , r j , ,..... -at � till- . . ., r 4,.-i, e �.„ . , „1, / , -, { ,� .zt * , , 4„,,,,e),,,,<,,,,,,T :Nliotiot.,': , �+�/eki • 10(4\1141.7:,:ors: f,,,,,, liolceitilLoi' ' ''s . ' , .1,4...„. , ,/ ,,,, t ... ,.: i„. '', , \k, 40 ,,. .. „ \ ' ,., it .1 \"la -:\\/.: l'''',.'. i41:::„...4,i,a111:',1,.41,': ' / s• 1'4 Ai . 41PIr' '''' N J. ... . Cyl. , 704c. i % ok ,)„ -a . 7.,. . - , , i,,-, „,..„..sv:,i, 14. ,..! ... lit ` t . . ,t� , . . * . r ...., .. .,i: #6,4 j:Cie, , lit kliillii‘ IL t VI . ,,,,,,,,t, 4,4 , . _ . , .• - ,A,,,,,,,, . e . ,,, , ,.......... ,, ). „, . . .., ., ., i . ...., . , ., .. ..,...,.. -, .„. „,,, ,„ . . s , i, , , . , . . , 3 3 - ift . .. I iv!,. - •• ,,, 4 4: / 41441 1. l - f ro aes 4 . t #r . .. ilk 4 , . .-,..% S , `' 114ell ' v411**4 4 "t k tir 4 ft ' _. t..‘A. - , ..*, ti , .i ,ilk i.„-,,. ,yle .re 4 & , y t , '}' ., + . },._ /A. / , . i i'�T' \ y ,; 1,- x4 ` - i� #`� ice. '!` 'I� l: •tt . • i IL itr R a �: 14 .. . .,. # •`ateats„ #.. y. '°� ,� t • y y tiA •vim • j ,11,414 �• ++ IX[Si[NG LANES ,N. tit I, a , `-•' I1444 } .< PROPOSED SHORT RANGE IMPROVEMENT 'i ' r }- N. y' �v� ,, 4/1*w 1111 ` . PROPGSm MEO[UN RANGE [tf'ROYE?!F?JT III 8 ,A1� + # fit"# .. +�. F`4 o'�; a.a 4 i I _ , - « t _�� Legend Crashes L -�_ 1 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN f A > .� Other .� Side t Pedestrian ii Raised Median - 0 Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections C_ri Kirdey+lan GUVDA JACOBS �7rsnsno«6on Right Left Bicyclist and Associates,Inc �'- «�_..� Improvement Location County Boundaries Q City Boundaries Rear End Headon 4 Fixed0bj SCALE t'=200 Fnendswood 21 ~ 4- _...._ . , ,....:, , . -, . Area Statistics z , > r .. ' ._i . + : �`� �� rota!crushes 64 a• >;�a a "'• � ,., ` �, i Crashes per mile �� * .4 ta t i #4. ✓`�:Ak, 1t�- , �_ j II Goal driveway density per mile 30 , ! it, +�� Total driveway density per mile 5 ` '� ` ► * * t Dnvewav density per mile EB 25 'it _ * ;. ;` # �' y Dnvewa dent r mile WB 1 s• ,�+ Y density Pe 20 i 4 • 3 s Driveway densith ratio 1 50 '' # ` i ;11: , , .„ *%ilk. i.,..... It.:. ...7,lik ; . Ng,'..:. • • tF .�L. SCALE 1"=200' J. ft • ! . ,(�j tq t 4 r r .• rim ` 1` �' *` �'. • 1.11 . 2 )414,. ., . • '�_} ite, �1- - 4 `\ • y 7.,,,. '...*--"N‘11.11 ri, b • . v . - , } 4. 4.,,,'..0 411 .1i. , , 4 ,,., ;..1.1,.. ,.„,, Ai, it, ii.i { Tj 4 A \ ,. jig I . 4(.. - ,. 0 ....: ,- . •... : - at.i,_ -...t- AI . • - -._ / fr a f / 4114, , "4..i. . I .- 41,10 a +F /�; / . 1114 - ' N • ... * , . , . , ... . , . .., ...t. s, jo 1111, Nt Patoil Vi .< ,it lore , di ' it' "IP' .. . ,. 44 lit\r)\-, ' .e: e __ if . 71:441":::4616:41K4'.11 ,1 .ler '' : - -1:' .iiPlarl' ' x:w\::1111111: ,� �. • a " -11°4 . •. _ ,, E t `-''4 .s • P. 411'; Y ' Ink kjo. ys ,"v I .Aik, l t \ii\ I w f{w i 0e\ w tt 4000 , ."4), . k- ' * .14 . . . .-, . i • ./ i>,,\* Vile �• s r. f r . lt lipv. . , . ,t. t_.,. 4, . . i f / \ r. 4- . elk. 1 t1 ' . „Si 1 - -....: ';‘,110111 . ,-41, ..40? _ . , ,: _t . . iii A \lit' ' - ,, f • r} te 4�; ff � �, .\/#4fs., `* �" o f ., �f �• �! '° E a ifi k.- , 6 40e / \ ' r - .., / - . , , t/ 6 lit +` ' . 1 * , t • 4 as ,.. , lli 4 K -`f. , f~.\L :\: dam ` y 'E.:t• F S! 1 . . �«, wr' t �1 • ./ iL Pi �, foilL s44, !- ♦ w / � t r till\iik,11 .,„...,,14 \ .- t., ii4-1411kiirr• / t,,,, C 10 s or Als. 0, ' : •it' ..,.. .7"...LA../ / . IN A‘i •- * I, • . s , 1 t Legend Crashes Friendswood 22 '` Other .�$ Side Pedestrian ,. FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN yg x I^ . i t titi i _Short Tenn Raised Median Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections ,t KirJev+iorn ,° o^' Medium Term Raised Median„®!County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist r r-- - 1 : i / rr�•' . C i G A JACOBS of Transpo tat on _Long City Boundaries 7 and Associa es,Inc Term Raised Median yam` Ai. • / ti Rear End 404 Headon 3 Feed Obi at. } " , / a + ir- • %' ,. '1 • Area Statistics r 1 `' • Total crashes 19 �5 it ii ` , ' r `' 1 j � ' Crashes per mile 10 i' , ti l'` ,» ` Goal driveway density per mile 30 ,,gi r ' » Total driveway density per mile 14 r;' : y Driveway density per mile EB 10 ).F \ f` Driveway density per mile WB ,,, 1 „e,'" `, .I;; Driveway density ratio o-t f • •, Existingconflict points 496 �. Proposed conflict points 314 >r .f r .4, . . .ft''' II * f ./.\-\ ilk ..' r yy If � - N / .. r s77 ••--i ,ft ' 0";* "VP 47/ - - A N... ' ' .n SCALE 1 2 r? , ,,,,,„„ „ 2, , ,, so„,.,4,..._......1........ , it. ,..,.,,...,,,,.. .:),,.. \......,:i r= 1 . . ./ --00 ..,,4 ----"..111PITIPI CP a .I, '\a 0 11'4 4'* \4P...A # ...iii -',„ --...."':22., / ' f N. a A - t * Wiekfilb2 ExIST[NG LANES f t * / f r'� PRLPOSED SHORT RANGE [MPROYEMENT .r, _ p �! _ - �r .,* a - : p N♦ rr -- PROPOSED MEDIUM RANGE C MPRJVEMENT '''• ,,� /`•• \ 1" l �l w r 7- . 4/ : 4° ‘r>7/ R • , • - x ' ''' ' sik ,e I J! N '..,_ . . r ills 4 1N. f/ s w 1 4 I- ` ti r ‘ •\ • •,_. die'', • N •.,• :- „, ..,.„ ,„ / 1 a.ifr - - A :" % VP a 4 :?t•joi . / ,_......... /.... 1.0.00 , • . „ ,. . ... 0, . ‘. . • ii . --_,.... / • 0. . .. 4 ..., . :_v.,k . ,,,,_ , .t< „ / ' vir er r/ / r 4 ` r' • ' .. _ "I• a , * * . ' N L / .,"440„ • r r r , }r j .,i Pe j _fa ..\.4, ... ,„, ._ /f tie. , , , ..... t fir l rr it, {x ,-.4 , \ :0 ,... ' '�- 7t,k_s4 „ .. , 'j 4,- of r • tilivoe— 1r 1,i.iv. „.. - / ,/ 4 � T l ' '411114'' ::111111ele\I.44.41\: %11:1111likik : a ' - ,'.1! , i \k:'''''' e ' Elg 1 ,.',., .s... , 4 .10.t.' , k . ' '- ' \ ti. . ' • ..., . 11....,,IXt:s1"" / . Ni fk, , ,, ‘ , , / \ .•... , „ / -tt• \ t ;IP''' $ * - ''' ..", ., :,.• / \ ',,, 8 V * , iktiii.:Nr. ,,,,, ± -e . c „ , 4 , or/. , / i \ ... , \ ` rit Pit ,. + * ,, ''-/fi r * A \ �' IV • / f l / . ,4 4,I.1% N 1.*‘ 1 ' ,, . It '' \ 46 . . Nis FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes / • Texas ' x -r Other Side Pedestrian i�Short Term Raised Median Q Driveway Consolidate Signaled Intersections J s C�^ ��eY I�� GUNDAoaparm am [� ardAssaleles Inc � +�K JACOBS �r an,portenon iiiiiii�Medium Term Raised Median ow..County Boundaries n City Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist r l Long Term Raised Median �b Rear End b Headon . Fixed Obi FrlendsWood 23 , :. f '- tr �, ^ *f ;, •Pr ', 1 f Area Statistics Total 19 ,/ o a crashes 4s� ,rc +i , ti e ,'�, • r�} 'Crashespermile 10 I _ `' �. . � .,� � t � Goal driveway density per mile 30 .t.--o / 'rLr ','_. . Total driveway densityper mile 14 , ...may":. fr.-4 _"if - r',. �,. -,_, \ / l 1 $:., .Y. , ^i...: t F �ti f ��,i ,` Dnveway density per mile EB 10 ' it s t 4 # , \V-J , _ \ + iI Dnveway density per mile WB 4 a t'S ��,.-'�t t / * \� y Drn ewa� density ratio • 1 0 47 .4 ini‘. 444 rr• y. , ' \ - .: p.: .='; ' - V 4' 0.4 \\\ 7' • — . %. `..- .`+"�' - - ' f �' ,// _ � +. SCALE 1"=2W I * . ...:sip. ,f 7- / ,.. - , ci. / si. % . .ilk \ .\\-410. ,,,.... Irak } / . . 4 4 i v * e\ rJ� , f .. , , , \\,,,,, ',,,,„„ iJ + / . + J►' �� ' ! x V11 � i 5 _.t di . i• - ��_. am—��.__ + � t . • ' Jf — -\ \ J J `_ r .° , , Y ' 4 F IP- 'i.i r ,: / I � • f* ihr, '�- _ * • / >►*!r►•, ' .• � t •..."• • ,� •'�', . Itfiiii I4+, * ,, \. t35A 51'Y i' r ff / /. . 1 A 1' Al IA' - 1 i J / } �► at # 'ti 34 ). �t t *` Via°„ q _ .. `� i '• y 4 i,' r 4 it ' - • -__ •- _ ---., '-w. w . a i a • t 41 1 / • •, A •I 400.;,„ a • I ` ! i w , . , , .. lb, "espou. tl j j\y / v.. „ \ /ii \if i i , \ jf.� , ...,_ .10, , ir y dit ie. "tili ikp �; pYes • I +.+ a 1 f f > .� x' a . ' .I s a y• . i j � ' rFr # s , )‘,t,.. A f \ `l • , ` • 1 4 ' IA % 444 , 8 , Y . eic$* ' , ,„, Iv . illif 1 i s rs .( •• ii• t it• ' NO', ‘ J. APIlk Ast's, - .„. 10. , N. ... ile A i ,./14,' .. .4 4101141,,,,. , 47.- '‘.. # 4 . .41,. ",.• _. / ' \ 1 1 % TT 0. Y / / 4' ''-'‘ iti: 1�, f. ,�+�I� • \r t +. , \ ., , .� alpoL` kAlks,..�V� Iilitkillth . q/R i • .erg, ■ r # :11' ' v . 7:k ...„.* ti: : F _ , , 4 )114 4. % • •••r 1 , 1. ♦ ,+4 • �` ! 1. _ e .•' p ''' • •A fifir Legend Crashes `� FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN -4.. A ; • Other Side t Pedestrian ` a' Short Term Raised Median 0 Drweway Consolidate i:l Signalized Intersections 1, . . • r . , ‘ V C �, Kirley+lan GUNDA r and A-Fkln es,Inv �G,G.,,•�... JACUBS �Tranvarewtr Texas rnn 11111N Medium Term Raised Median _ County Boundaries Right Left A Bicydist / L `�Long Term Raised Median n City Boundaries / 4014144 Rear End !llikii Headon i FixedObj FfjelldSWQQd 24 r 1 t, ' r AreaStatistics�, r t r rh t metic w Total crashes 19 a _ }' "- "' a' ♦ ' _ Crashes per mile 10 % .fir , 4044' y , w {� r / " •,t ♦ ♦ r •F ♦ _ As Total dnv way density per mile y density per mile 30 . i 14 y o�, , + , r r �, 4 M . ♦ s , ei Driveway density per mile F,B 10 • mi e way r tt - « ` Dnvewayedensityns do I WB t, . r A x 5Jt" ,iG, .,... f f - * J , ' ..? . . • ,' . * a ` ' ri • • Al yr. ro r`#1., ç; r or , • 'Or #04 r i .ezec f 4 / 4 . . .r, _., .. 4 I. r ' . iLp or .ie re'1 ♦ / \),..it a # c • < °` $ 1 { , .., :,.. + / it' , v 7 - \ re lo { ;+ 1 f 4,,► 4.,4kt..4 f r t elerf r I- 4 1/,i ,, eT fa f a �� . ! r r, .. - �_ � - Ott r t _ryM1-1 _ ,r, t ` • j 1 f k: J - r je i r It r I Legend Crashes -. ` - FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN .G-P-) Short Term Raised Median • Drrieway Consolidate Signalized Intersections alfilibi Other �i} Side x Pedestrian N 4 Tax. ,D.parlmeni Medium Term Raised Median,�"County Boundaries O City Boundaries Right Left • Bicyclist SCALE 1"=200' Kinieyaiorn GUNDA or rrannponenm coon and Assaiales•Inc i� .�+.A fe JACOBS ®Long Term Raised Median diTb Rear End triliikr Headon 4 Fried Fnendswood 25 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Texas � Klnle -Httn `GUNDA �� and Assaiafes, Inc. ��.,_,��.� JACOBS'Department Transportation Legend Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consolidate Medium Term Raised Median --- -4 County Boundaries Long Term Raised Median Signalized Intersections City Boundaries Crashes Other —46 Side Right Left Rear End bllibt Headon Pedestrian Bicyclist Foxed Obj SCALE: 1 "= 200' Friendswood 26 Area Statistics Total crashes Crushes per mile Goal driveway density per mile Total driveway density per mile Driveway density per mile EB Driveway density per mile Vd13 Driveway Density Ratio 19 10 30 14 10 4 0.47 i 1 r 1 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN JACOBS „KinnleyHorn and Associates, Inc. GUVDA W'. f ;Vet ifDepartment Transportation I°l Short Term Raised Median 0 Medium Term Raised Median Long Term Raised Median Legend Driveway Consolidate County Boundaries Signalized Intersections City Boundaries Crashes asiiiis Other Side Right Left Acilekrk Rear End - Headon 4 Pedestrian Bicyclist Road Obj Area Statistics Total crashes Crashes per mile Goal driveway density per mile Total driveway density per mile Driveway density per mile E13 Driveway density per mile WB Driveway density ratio SCALE: 1 "= 200' League City 27 - Area Statistics P, ••c ` f ! ��. f \�l Total crashes 33 ► ,, $ • , * / Crashes per mile li rr ► , , it Goal driveway density per mile 30 • `� � ; '� Total driveway density per mile 21 , ,V 'N 41 ' ,•' `,ti 's , r t 'R mile EB <' ` "`' 1 Driveway density per 7 ; ♦ ./ 5 r 1. _ 1111,\, Driveway density per mile WB j � \ • -' .., ...lt Driveway density ratio 0.69 ! ` , . ,. '' s • ' • , , ''.... . -' . , . ,& , ..--\: . fTl Y 4 tt`\ hi t _ . - . W. yy +ls i= t S• f r t /may .r • •- 1 • Sill' \' • ', \\, 4. iel° \ .0101, i i 1 // . \,„-'''' h k -r)1\ aT i + . J 'ti J it, _,—_d,_."..//i—i—r-i 70?" \I. VT,' \r - • ...,."•.-'', ,•...-•,.-,\-.. ,..._'-',..„,,'.,... 4,,N„-. —.°'_.l i/,,k,,..r„-.,..,..._,.'' ,.,..,7.*. -t le •, ....„''.,.,....,,.„....4. .,4!.0:k-,3_* ,. \i., % ....,........,..,. .,.,--,-A,,r. 1 t .l,/k\,,'1, ..--,..-,1)/0,,.i' V� t '+ cam`,' 1,04° ... ..',...\% ,.„.. i * , ,„f...... • ..,.,:* .. .....\. , 411,. 1. ...._., 1 .,�,, `, —_-- \1....0...----..—. • ----, - _4 ,.... . A. - . , 5 a �� „ 41.\•.. , _. .• ...,...---- . ,, 4 . A ' eA '''-°e.. .- .-i, : I " ...\\ ._ ..., . . )11' 411511.r. ., "lb - . . . . . . t_ . :-- - . - . . — • ...:'. \ \ ' 3 6 i V w_ •; Mk A• YY j * * IP i ,,,,_ 4...,,,t 4,_,...„)._...... ,,,...,\;___ \ _ 4, . ... . .001\:..t... ..oiki 5 .\„: . .,:it, ilk , ,.:7„,* 2,..\\:..,,, R ,� • .144:114H . .., Ay - F-- - k \,._„•—• deossor, ----_ \•- •-:..•'-••-- (_- - \10., ,,c, - . 7- e v ..., -,0 „__. , ....4 't A ,,f, \ \\ * • act a li"I- 1 ti 1 d 0f t°. I" mmitommiAiiiIil,lm;lo w'o' 1` = ` r , .„ - i EKI9T[NG LANES - i PROPOSED SHORT RANGE [WRQYE} NT .*i"""�'i" mo .Own E _� .-e a + r- PROPOSED M£D[UM RANGE IMPROvEMENf Legend Crashes © "- FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN F I A ; Other Side A Pedestrian .—. _, Ar Tau mil Short Term Raised Median Driveway Consolidate date Signalized Intersections t♦ n c:' . o�rd _Medium Term Raised Median Right Left Bicyclist SCALE 1"=200' , , \ JACOBS or Transportation ��County Boundaries C�/� an7 A a'esrs City Boundaries _Long Term Raised Median I Rear End Headon * Fixed Obj League City 2 8 Area Statistics ' . . 4• !.. i^y • r �' 4 ti\ Total crashes 33 , '' • 1 • \ \ Crashes pe r mile 13 .' 0 , Goal drivev a. density per mile 30 Y09 6 « a + t 3• ® , I Total driveway density per mile 21 " ., �� Ito ..- '!y '0b `. - r� '► • a llm'eway density per mile EB - " A 1" } ►r" _ 11 ti Driveway density per mile WB Id { =-` ! �� ;,~.' r i . + t'' • - Driveway density ratio 0 69 j`F y~ ti ` y t Y } , - \ \ • - w • L.'s I " ,•"' MIS 4, \ \' • �y ` t Xi . ` �� eta " _ r 1 .„.....A, •^w . • ' I \ •"-' of =r`�. _` - +l '' '. 4 I Via'` • l f \ \ A API, r : . s. Y°''Y4.• , ,____ _ _y'•� ' yr'".,.r Sy, ' �,„,,,,,,,,,...\\ ,1'a y1,5 5� , �t # , - .. — yy . ,A, .,......." ..410: , ..„,....: , ,:ii. : ri - - „..0.:7• 4. 1 z . Fr • .. ..,,,,,e' - ...,...-4;''' . - i i 71/4,,.,,_• \ '. i ,ki 4. ..,...-- 'I . - .111 r, y iy *a ry t f ' • , a ' 'tom 1 -1----. i 11- , , , i, ,....... / ..., , , yyy }w I , •,.‘ • ..,...,,...... ,.... .. .... .... _ ,. . , . • . \,„, , _ . , , ./ .,/ t-i = fr-- - (----___ , „ _ \ ,, . ._, .. = _, \ \ . . __,,,,.,...„. ___._____, , .. I . . . , ,/ r yj , _,_ . . ` l �, .•� '.�� ti 1 1:6117 --7, ‘, r y ? ' ,,,,, 1\4 i a ;, ill*: 4 . ...r ' • •.. ., ,„• j \ 37 z I ,1,11:1------/,'-_.,-- -..'" . KIII\4, A L ? '' 1 ;,': . . . _,--I\ '...,-,,, - „........------- ', -.-...,,,.,..,--fi- . . ,. , . . , , , . A——— t •'-' 'II q - I j • t VV Y FH5ll8 i +It ' -- .. )1 ( Ji , ito Nit- • I � III,. .i 1 + itli ? � f iiii - �' III �, II I I • i ,, . itAr... t, r . t by + I� y III II I l ? Ii • i ,'- (xi STCNG LaiES i•- y I I- l I III I jl 1 it +Y = RROPflEEO '�l gRT' RAIiGE I FPROVE.€NT • 1 i + ! -PROPOSE© FEY1rum RANGE CFPROVEhENT f I • • I 1 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN �( Legend Crashes T I ` Short Term Raised Median Legend Short Signalized Intersections ' Other . Side x Pedestrian ` C=„ Gmley Horn i GUNDA JACOBS Department _Medium Term Raised Median, CountyBoundariesRight Left • &cyclist ' andAssodates.lnc wrraraporfetlon n City Boundaries SCALE 1"=200' - --a _Long Term Raised Median Bicycle Pedestrian Improvements 414. Rear End yolito Headon i Fixed Obi League City 29 Area Statistics a 1� m. I I THI - \ O+�1 Total crashesiri _ - t 1 I /f L -- r y Crashes per mile 1.3 1 r dye �, I I �_ , j it` r4 yJi•� tir t - i �''L 1 }-- Goal driveway density per mile 30 / ' f''�-- I 1 •� I i --I / • Total driveway density per mile 21 i ---I -- J �r1� �4f`y Dnve��ay density per mile EB l + I + _ IL 1 II � a/ L �i I f--- -- �. r r f _�-'' Driveway density ratio 0.69 -� t �► \ 5.\\,.... S�1 R If- - -~� =it II11 f: r �, L 4[ • 4�.' f t • 1 \ll _ s +' r _ 'id i __ —S' ' /' t 5 41 L . . ....,i ,... .... a L 'rl�. .fis , ,i1 ;_--- Ij_ i I i I ! •LL '• Sr , •' i re I I ! L , • i -----'c- \ V i .. , • r _ y • . ii. ... a._ , i i _ _ li ii ., ft .,,, , \ , „ „ , ,...\- , , I 1 4,:: .. 1 ____ '1 ii . ,i ' . / ' ‘ A 7/r"°' ,,,,,. , . --- - I N‘4,-,. , _rib, • 401" , . -,-'''''.. ) . ,. .._t_ t,.\ / _.\,.,...----"'-' .4 1 fitt4kf • { , r--_ " a 2':.�- y = s e\ , ' ,, ------- 4.. nil I r jf( lip ..... _. , f ",) le, I yj)/�/I! is --- , � I k .- _- 34111111111 '. r. I ..* ...,„00444. r.• _ .1441„. .c. ii api I - : ' —� _-, N. • r t 1 Y1-100 5y "4 , . sivi; — _ ! J 111 r 1r y 5 '� a I et i • • M _di -it r to ,t /J r+ t '• "- I ' -1' 1164 —4— I a ' / ---,...._ ) i [__ i 1 a vita. -4 , . . *IA, a1 '� —_— T " — 1 It • i It Pillrell. ' — i ill ri .1t1 I .., *MP II P. liningl_ v 11 :: OE I I kg" i "11 i / ' PIII IIIIIII: _\ . ,.... . jam ,,„.„-- ____,.•-•c \ _. \\..,:\I______ _--------.;--- , - 4 ...... I 1111 rt. All 11 1 IIG 1 1 Ile I 1 ' , 1 --. i 1 1 _.. , ' i . 4 1 ra ill i : tIa ;iiiPl .. t "� till. II li ♦' ,I w I �� .+ r . timiw, 1, A ! I IMr 1 i • '- '.% \\:4441`, '' I „ , i . , \ • ,,._ .. ,,,, \ \''',,,, 1:40....,..{ 1 _-i-- -1-'-- 7 N-, 7-,-- .- i - -t ' SI I . ow 77- 4 .-. i"---bI '' or- 1 i - ____j- 1 1 _ -1---famil. a a S1. y r gr . , , '� 4� '- i - II IS FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS ; Legend Crashes •. Other Side Pedestrian N � I per Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consoldate ij Signalized Intersections } G <141' '•) GUN • � � rranscon �I, and Assciates.Inc SGDA �..,,,• Medium Term Raised Median___County Boundaries Right Left 4 Bicyclist SCALE 1"=200' • -- f Long Term Raised Median n City Boundaries - BicyclePedestnanimprovements eiiib. Rear End 4E4 Headon .f FaedObj League City 30 avitArea Statistics ' 'e ti �,• '7k it— #,` it . I f h' ,' 1 , ` ,y.- 4.1,�� ., ej Total crashes 69 f i. ,.�.,..,t ' ,� l 4%, f A A .� .a Crashes per mile RR _ite Goal drip cs.-ay density per mile 30 t P '61 " * �� " ww w Total driveway density per mile 59 "'" .. r .Ir..� i ' � , i llnae5�av density per mile 1',13 2G �" �' ' + • {r� ,..rir sr 411fr: 11 DnveS‘ay densrt� per mile VJIi 33 r � i, � +' . :. • t r �- ,; � s j" � Driveway denstt� ratio 1 97 _ 'u� I .:1 ...........*****Ipommewilmoug7 J� ,;% , f , ., .. i� I s a / Fit f dil +� _�- _ _ • - Aiew "t ..._ e, • .......17 _ .. ...„......„.."--, , . ,..... _ ... .0, ---4...,_ ,MO i ills . - . ,-. ,. ".#4. V.'SP\., i ,... )) ' iii If tla...16.....sof.""9.7 t , r ---> (. ,. °, 5 ti 4400.\.: ,.....:i.... ,,,,,,,,,: li.,.''''', ..„ ,,-,.,1. ,_*ikt„ _ -•'' ' -. ,, ,,a 4 ,:.;... 11' 3....-' it iti,,,, / .. . ', i ',. , : 7, . .*. lilt 4 z__ Existing Lanes P , s 3 ' `# �1 tI - Proposed Short Rortpe Irtprovent6rtt ►' *w t � ! a j Alii r ,; igt•, ,ry t0 S - Proposed Med an RorYQe [rprovament s II w+ "- ! , _ JM ,o •w t 'C, Ot * st e Ii. get - - -, \ -- - -- 46. . • tit r { e s • ti 0 _- rill s� Y. i r.-.i.I.1 a.1 d.4,•l0 1,i1.- ti -,-iI-w- iv- •.,'J., I I1 I I I 1 \iI I,1 Ie1 r,—i,i ,i...-._;..,..o:.4#.-.a. 'l.,al FA'',_... II.—..i_i,...'„1‘...'._-_;...f..—,—*:.,, - o-%'-.--,.,-,p\i-.,k_oIk-., r„rir V.-,\-0v---\ .%•A1 4.p:_e __ _r_ A.-.'-.,-- _.-_.--. 14-•'A,i .I.1 1r,, -,31 ,1" .....,.,-,• ,.•,.,•..•..„:•. .'•t•.••4- .T \-4;i-,l4:i"V-\,,i'a-4.:.l..-1 i,a.4A.'°.'--.)1%l",1i'4,.t' ,,11_'-',-1'1.\._:,\6%-1_1_'„1-o.,- 1,.-p1..'..1I._.i-.,-;---".I.AIIIII\mI',,i I,\,t I:„ '\.,.t.,,..4,.\'\-:•i\.l t,.,c.r.',,._,..1...4'...'\ R . '-,4.' „e.:i,•_'.d'r,4 A._„1_.,.:.i.---i„2-1'-..,,-,Y-1'.',‘&.,'.,4..4„„A _.-_ I t r --Ty. ,.. 1 r y1 , r 4. x t --A. . 5, i 4 •.'" is "^ __1', qq i t yam/ 5 _ i '\ �FTv �1, 47 -- l a r o ^ ^ FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend crashes I ._ qtritto Kirde Ho'rci l T•xae '7`-" ^-� Short Term Raised Median Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections Other dii� Side x Pedestrian l C.�„ andl�ssalates lnc 6' JACOBS _Medium Term Raised Median_-_County Boundaries 1 T City Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist SCALE 1"=200' _Long Term Raised Median • IBicycle Pedestrian Improvements * Rear End Headon 4 Fixed Obi League City 31 " , , I rt Area Statistics Total crashes G9 . `}LSwa ye ey.a..w.,,.,. Crashes per mile 88 ' Goal driveway density per mile 30 ..r ' i )) I I Total driveway density per mile 59 E y Driveway density per mile EB 26 f` ti , • Dnveway density per mile WB 33 t<, fi t° '/ �� i , ' r --- tr „s Driveway density ratio #. ; ) ) -- . r i i �; r ft., 6t8 ^` 1.41 i �k , `� `` v- Ta u. 4. • ie. r • -*:.:40: vv. �— FM Ste \ i� * EXISTING Lams ' t • '� •__ PROPOSED 9-IORT RANGE I FPROYEPEN i ; . ',---\;00k e - • - t i �1 \t ti - PROPOSED 1EOIWI RANGE (H'ROVEh£NF 1 i1114 o. ie ' 4. ,i,., 4. kliio., 60,--1'4°.„.00` '-' I i . y� ..\\ ` f F 2'es ' a)iiiiilif % • ‘ ,., :1,4 . -- • 1 eh EXIST[tt(i LANES 1< 1 olirl f ,`1. T - PROPO EO SHORT RANGE ItfR13VEHENT , ` e.• �^ • ' • ;•f � ,e �v � . 4 - PROPOSED FED[UM RANGE IHARGVENENT +64 . `+ ° : ,e _______ . „ _.„004, : i, 7 .044,1(4‘ ' \114/111101, " ` F�' t ,.' +F#-�'s�•"� f . .*fir• { 'A \ r 1 et ' bi 1.0 - " ' ---Ti ' .1* ''' 0, 41 if itk 0141111‘. *S- 4' G. 1111 k 1 -, . " i —:.. 0...3,tVir P-ri ' •,,II` di, r i A. w \ 1 I ' .o?". , Y. 3 �. !to , .f ti',t' „norm f _ _ 42 I I rk r�+reati.e awn owr r«,�u reef so we rw.iwn 11 sir t IC7 T Imp 111 N itt is,. .---- kA,,, I .... It. ••,‘ Itk .‘4Akti" �MO { _ T' A fir , r i ,,4. it. ,., .. id„„0 ..- '4\ ** 06 ' i' ♦ • 0„ _ tom, ,w ., A. 11144 ‘4 , .,,,,t•: 't / -8 :'' *re *iv4 ' * .• . leiti ' Ur 111. 1 r. i 11 . ilik 11. I '.• ; t 1. t s w 4� 0, k• • � t ,',� -- 1 is t - EX16T[NG LAf1Es 11111.1161.°111.111111\110.0"111 , f. , . Ill!,*,' 1101F- • ''.. r* ,t'',4%..:I'll 1111 * trrersh ei, i ti a M ,,s A� I PROPOSED SHORT RANGE It�ROtD€NT "f *4. • • r} y # n ,.{ 4#0�� ` Ae l PROPOSED FEOtUM RANGE (F'ROiDlltf i 4., � icy FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend Crashes -. l� dab Other •di,y Side t Pedestrian N ~�_ ~` WM a-w. GUNDA Q o•parmnne ill �Short Tenn Raised Median Driveway Consolidate Signalized intersections ► rw Il and �c es,Irrc 0pu+ K - JACOBS O Tr""5•t1"' _Medium Term Raised Median�_ Right Lek Bicyclist �r N County Boundaries n City Boundaries 9SCALE 1"=200' _ e�y,, _Long Term Raised Median .eke. Rear End *lab. Headon I. Fixed OW League City 32 .e.... • t "M. a Area Statistics -IP ) f' _ { iF * y , Total crashes 139 B w c , t I Crashes per mile 120 1p Jo �r si {i ' i it Goal driN eway density per mile 30 , ,. •r• .+s x Total driveway density per mile 62 — Dnveway density per mile EB 25 '* '"" •, '"' `, tti 4., w r IDriveway density per mile WB 37ter illhDrneway density ratio 2.07 T F _ „w —t I ' 4- '# , ,..,., e ' FM 51Bill. E i 1 t n + t • a 4 r 601.4 l ac II III jos. \ \ `,., � � '- ; ir i i 1 Alt _ .._- s s_ Existing Lanes • �•�""l - �� i e aF s 45 �.T- '� Propoeea Srxrr Range ]rrprwement ,r -�, i ,.....______ * ilk 40$16 ..... .. p� Proposed M9tli um Range Improvement }'�' ' �• �:� # ts"' �ti lk i 1.'i 1 .- ' ... 0111111,61•P: 7 . 4* \ * 0 ':1111111.1111\k` t '- N It • v., I '' swim • , _ ,. � 1 ,� " -, � al ,� �.` Tom" � II\ (I, i se 11 • ,,,„ ...., ,,„,„ '...,. s t \iii:00. f ,1 - � w y , `ice. -yrr _ar*. arril r�-- ft n,lnr�' iillh_P _ • 0 n� '. ' �. ,gyp. `-� 'ti I - . ,,., • - T . A‘4 i.1 , ' - ''11------- ..--- --ir 4 \ . ., . .4„. Na 4" r - a ,, ...iir -- ,, , :._.„ s A.,1r • t - `, R l ,, __,...>_,-, „,_, . .0.4 ,, • \ , , __, it , .... . . r _ • I t A - ,4 \i ` 1 ..k------ ft—e:-1 ooe.t,t-,e.___r_i,i,_,-, ,• :\,7'*4'4''r. .A4,-/_. ./..N('-\'*,,,„/ \A-,r.' ir '.',., \ 4.. 1 T l , ,N•,:,.4..4 4:i.i 1 W jy - ,ik./1# .,.. ,,_ . 4 * :,,, / , , \ -•A C \ T - , 1 ,, , I \ 1 4- - r-,Tni . ...4 \ 4 /7\ 41111111 1 1. h.. 1,,L,lio_Lir.j1 i „,....,,470. ,, \ . '' "7 4 0,1\21\0.4i. ,,,1/4. 4.11,010'40/ ,\00\,,,'. viii '' \\O" __. I\ \ .• 1 0. se • L 1:--n, . 1 *IL ' ,* '4' ',4" '.••..,-teir' Legend Crashes N FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN -* r ; Other . Side 1 Pedestrian rods �` Short Term Raised Median Driveway ConsolidateIgt Signalized Intersections ` ''1"', 16 �, n11 Kude`lian �r r MEI Medium Term Raised Median eee•.y Coun Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist SCALE 1"=2(Xl' 4 jf .•�,!r'-� } GI-INDA 4 JACOBS "'porte°O" n City Boundaries C „ andkssoci�es,ln � _ _Long Term Raised Median f K/ Rear End Headon .1 Fixed Obi League City 33 _q Area Statistics �' ', ': w ,'.'' .�� v \ .a . Total crashes 139 4 6ikcs * t. •� toii Crashes per mile 120 al { "1 ' 41./ oa ., i. ' ' Goal driveway density per mile 30 '^ lif, Total driveway density per mile 62 , , I ► 41 �. _ ' .. ^ - ilkDriveway density per mile EB 25 ` N y / � jf , s41 ' I Driveway density per mile WB 37 r v �� Is ,• * • t ,., ► ; ;, 4;, Dnveway density ratio 2.07 • 's.'C,Is . , 4111, 'ti.� y �! < Existing conflict points 1,184 rn i i — ;� \ \ r' Proposed conflict points 226 v t ° 4, FM 518 « , . ,..:ip. ,. . lw.r . ,..'' ,..,,, M\\\C. "...- 11111Vilitudi: - -)44\/„,e. '41 • 7 ,. 4 . lici161# « SCALE 1"=200' ' A ♦` p‘1 7.1 . ' ,,\X.,.. . t r 11/4„., a f' . i'r*r_"Iai,t-•-IIIt ,.-*I ! } ga.r ' • Existi Lat eS .44,*4 \...„,...,/.\)\-'1'\,.<..C,,,s„>'‹. . '\.c/•-r\ • ' , .a-r1/•....te:v•4r*; T. dr r4/7*1/4-,.:. .,.,S..lg*--.,i l.,...0.\.l''i k '/,> ZTt „ Propoee4 Shari Range lrrproverttent 5 'I._-/"-- -.. ` 1 - Propose4 Me4ium Range Improvement 4. 4 t + - * t,4_,p.,. 40 L,. * •.‘, .g ,,. 4A4.,,A 1:N4-_ .l i\,',%-.,.,S. ..-- < 7 ` a l • A\\ i IL„ ,, ,;A:4111:, . , N ,,,, . : , ,..., '" .., s , \\,, \1114 '_ ...-f . -:—L' -T-1 1 A ' \ ' / • il: / \\' '''' . lk S i♦ 1'?" . J t1111 .//'\\< '. •- ''''''' .'-,. . '' ' A lk f i' • �11 E •� ,iill .- „Oad . ---- +'t, \ , sf ail rt �� / f, • a A_ \%., „/"" * \ PI'. 7 01 ±. 'Y i s'` i L ... \ • ',, 111 1, 'ral",*4 t ' .4' ''"' '.e "?ektiC-411S10% 4 ' 17 ,II I.ii.I I.„I 1...:11P • ,..i ! _ - f; �R a' 4"� ' ,,,�, `_,` , it •� ...- •.; . a' - --` /{y _�� 1 N. r , w '1 1 ` ti4 '�� 7'S 4 t ! ulk °� 4 - � �5' � F � ` i�/��1 it « Albr ifg �q� V+ jihile IFF`� .. ,sr ._� „, »,.. ...., ,,, L . / )0! ,.....-^\ , ... .), ,...... Sw Al r'• 1 , is /` ://, 1 I �J' 71 . . '4. Iri • t ,. Au , i • - _ ` «Lea ue A 34 ` t r - tO1. r Legend Crashes g Y = _ ��l• # ' �, •. FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN g $T} Other Side I Pedestrian + _ j A,/ r+. \ _Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway Consolidatett Signalized Intersections - [ i' 7 Ay '�I� KimleY�� G�UN�DA • _Medium Term Raised Median�� County Boundaries Rignt Left Bicyclist F - I \ and Associates,Inc �,� n City Boundaries �� _ �Tr.neporla6lon _Long Tenn Raised Median _�, _ ert., Rear End reiiiiii, Headon 4 Fixed Obi I _ ICS `� i ,¢ , / Area Statist' Total`' • • fr o a crashes I?3 .` ` I Crashes per mile I I{, • 0' , f �,, _ ' t'. • 4 �,, 4 P �.� d Goal driveway density per mile 30 / 'fin t , \; , Total driveway density per mile 60 / I• \ �, ► . Driveway density per mile) B + . _ % Driveway density per mileWB io aj i i die , 1; 1 4 • . �f • + , - ' � Driveway density ratio 1 99 J/ i ; ` s k� A ' *'' ;'jam .w , S. Oj�` f � . Ille 3 , :,, • ,tk ai,„ . , u * " ;',It , . r / ter'\ ` - r • ,� , - i v. q f/ f - L £ titot • I t 4% 1 ?"\ *it t µ, J�, % d s • it • ' . �r ' i it ram_ R * i►'b r �` t \ ; i ,too q)J��...c., F. i i,<„,.. t. y #'tr r t�f '+ i • ilt.„4„ 1 8)4 / ftik, ' . . ,T ' NiA illiiik 4. 4 } .41A 'f.--71k , sk r J , 1 111. ,/ 0..'- jam. fN-„0..„‘.„._,'A, //` 0• 1► •.>.e'..,' tpi .,,,Il k. • '\. hl\ . ' 1 } # SEE``` /' _ ,, 1 ' t- 4' 1,' 44: \ t '. --`" ' •-•110111( 04 • .: 4 ,� a /- App h • A - 4. n .r 49 *Atl fle ,/_ 4y 9f • • x ` I �va 4 / ii, 44 . / / . 4 , \ i , i _4 . it. pp •• '' 410\\ / . , '14 ."41. ir / // \ "is> - - / - 4 /1. At •„.../ , • ,. t . t �, , • ..,,, ,,, /1 „ .". . Legend Crashesr" Efi -- ,,. FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN - Other Sde ,t Pedestrian N r.r•s Short Term Raised Median ® Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections '� h. ��^ EnIey-Han (,UNDA • ,� orfaV .- - _Medium Term Raised Median___County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist �l —� ar�dAssocLs,Inc 0GUNDb aay' JACOBS orrB spun ro C Boundaries �— Foal Long Term Raised Median City �� SCALE 1"=200' a„ Rear End Headon i Faedob, League City 35 <'\ ,� :' , I' - Area Statistics >,1�` ' r y r ► Total crashes 173 441. _ \ Crashes per mile 116 • { a. },; ' ; + s '� . . Y v ' 'a 1 �O• 4 _ Goal driveway densth per mile 30 'j 'j�, 4mg r. y :., !,� ' `ti;+. .. t , • �,s # — Total driveway density per mile 60 � t I fr. ,4 L N. S t``. ' r" T .4011 Driveway density per mile EB 24 ' ^ ivt 10 • * • .1 +I ' _ , f a ` ar�: • J Ihtveway density per mile WB 36 k j3 �j M r " " s' L ;* ' "� 7" `� �� Driveway density ratio 1. 's s As 4 77 h- , . .7 \ \ .\1 �`' 1 0. • - i 4 ! „A/ , III '� - S r : w ` Y • - h a \,\ -='.. �7'. tl f `•' I III II ,0\ A-� t ' �. 1111. • t 3 ittik `� l 15 A. )6 , 1 P ,./ # # '4Y. A to \ . \\I \ Ix'''. '14'I /0 ' 4 14,ila \ 4, I . ty �, it it — 'i \� I s �P et sr s ,t ;IS 444 • , � � � 4 of, ; j!C' �, �y `�L' I 51 `a tf� - �`� 'lit t / v 4 4 �( •s •ar „ 4 ,!I!�` - 'r, .*, A'` �. .. ,` } III '% '` y s , . 0 e\ • ... . , y- , . , , 44 `\x ■; "/ \ }. ti Fir yam. • 1—i ii '44tat\\ ,,,, , , Illy 5 0 . , . ;,. ,,... . _ k 4\:\ k, :IP, 4 it ., A is 40 a .04 14,0, ‘i 's JO ' /. di 140 Aiii s 4.46 _ r+l FM51$ s ..4it el k 4.‘, r., \4.N \ 118. • i )1" I I / I • ' � r, Itlitk„ 1 ♦ _ ,. \ � ,,,�, is r, *F \ \ ice\\ ; '' r , r \ l 1 , \ ` / ,�. Existing Lanea II \ \ �7� = ,,. Prapoeed Short Range Improvement \\ I Proposes Me4 I',iv Rave mprarenen t 1' Iiiii 44 Legend Crashes w , _. M fip FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN - fie_` Other Side t Pedestrian r•+u i�Short Tern,Raised Median Q Driveway Consolidate Signaled Intersections [TO " Kinie+lorn , eft (♦Medium Term Raised Median--- Right Left &cyclist -1-r y i GUND� �, JACOBS of r.,...ponaeonCounty Boundaries City Boundaries SCALE 1"=200' CI� andAssaiales,lnc. i I Long Term Raised Median Rear End e044, Headon i F6ced Obi League City 36 J lir ,e- ' /ir . 116000 "..- 40( • I - r ---ir ir- 11.: •111.4.6 AL, I . •,,, : , " ,,. e• " ... , , ..- ', _ . • \AP' ." • Not li • - s ' trrr" S ,,... ate■ . rr�� if Z ...• t • 410.1, .,.fit _ ..t tee 6 rrr1-111r S ir.� [ + 4:1 : 4: yr. +r. .. y • d • �i.� • - • •• 1 :#:' 1 1 fr- ( . i7T • Ara - .. ilF4 k 10 it di -__:: ' 7-11411 . „ 4 i .--A, -,.. .amr, 14.1t61 ,_ # : : _ r " r A s ! t+ gg 1° f �j - t _ 4 WO e y K as i -, .bi 1 '''' _ a 51/ t ft 41 a *Ail '4' :4,411 aallif .-o ' I _ ..,_. : `r + It f - Ilk y xs t r I: 'i _ , s ' t I i I r u `14 • "ii /fI 4 / •• ° ty .,• ` ice . Ni —— - k _ I ,'t l `. '" Y i. e • _ T r - v I -14 I ILL "‘....,_ , ..- '1, t i 04 .00.01 \ . \ 4 AA a• . •• 0111Nitr. la 4.4c II* ' w. i t ey 5r f t }- . - • v ► a 1 14 Ii ; '" \ � I - } 411 I III I �---- �.-_ � m L ''" _ �� °,p 4 �I' r F FM 2694 ilr�a T '• �� i : R t ar to/ a ;f \ 1,4 s41. ye �" ome tors '•1 }f s + II , - , `MIIfMff'IMf —fit +al Ma t �a}' ~ `•° ... t. 1 l4 �' ` 4„ f ` _ Area Statistics l , } * + ''i, Total crashes 76 • f ,I \' = ', .,,4. �� Crashes per mile 55 rti r. ` I• ',I ---- Ex i s t i nQ Lone s '� Goal driveway density per mile 30 �` ' ." Total driveway density per mile 24 - =ry ate_ t�` ` y, Proposed Short Range [nprcr n rtt f Dnveway density per mile EB 12 Propaeea LCirfq Range Irpravenent l I'll IS ' Dnveway density per mile WF3 12 f ti 'r Driveway density ratio 0 77 4 IFM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN -4' i Legend Crashes,7� i �Short Term Raised Median Q Driveway Consolidate �Signalized Intersections � Other �} Side t Pedestrian ._ ❑fin Kirde`-Horn teas -. r \ i (U\D:1 1�i, �(+�S Department (♦Medium Term Raised Median_,,.,,,,County Boundaries Right Left * Bicyclist SCALE 1"-200' and elscociales,Inc n City Boundaries L_ _Long Term Raised Median .DAJ* Rear End VI* Headon 4 FaedObt League City 37 111, . , itr .,:. A,\ I, -- , . 44" .011111111Wo 4i di , 1 , ii_ii.:040:1111111 \ \ .Z If 7.* •:4P-a - . ` , i. .,, 0111 ioder i \r. , ..............0 ,196 % \ \ .,,\\H\ - - ... -A i, jilt! 3'6 1 Ii\-,\ .•1•••••••.. • - . I j \\N\C\ : ---___ , e 4 10 ) ----,_ ilit , A wk: ....:\ 4 r7.---,.--,,,,,..c 44:k, j AIP• Aid64.* ''' . I • / --:. ,, i i ----k *A - ' ` ; , i4„,--. .4, \ ..117,,,.,1 \ —,._:gil:- .: ll i ,E: 17 __.";.. *Ali\ ‘„ ., . : , k__ ---- : _ , %., 3 1 w `.� �. �-� __ - , i , --2 . ' \ .�_=- l'ii " �'' it I , "� � �t y M,° +► �' *j -� � t yy j p�ti � � 4� � i oelhlipp. • ,, ............ , N‘ _ ',41. 1 1 , ill \ ,_p., ---.„.. _ "'4 4 fill:1 . IdiniktP 44. . ...N‘ _ , -P . ',., tSI 4411141.ISitlit , ,0004‘*IN' ,... \f .rAi a ,,. __, i , : . ' : - \ JD f J( j y NN \ A, --Y_- } .jam r+ r - r0 Ma - -�-+.. �• c.- :1_7_. -V-1\ ri.-rlii-:7: y r' __ wr. .- -- -44- j1.11141116*___ __:-_-_-.\_-_- __ Ah / r ter. _ _ - �_. fir' T In I SI % ir ‘<'\ \---- / i . ......-- -.411rir-- :,...' . 1 II TP-+L s 4 —y .. _� j ` *1 17:- y1�H'! — li s .1.4 It."--.T,' — .IL( II \ 111 • Ili ..--.' , ,,-- gue City { =_ I , F 44 i_ \II. S. r L ►*WgiliiIIIMW- I'l ' , ' I, �' .4' v�q1► j--- 11 }• I II I� III I II— nk Let____- 11 ._ a - AO' • ti� �,, ilt , .. \ " \ \ v..-,-- \ it, _.*--li t -umiak \'-- ' ..1k ',:,_„.f. 1, % op" lip \i , \ . _ - --- , \ . _ ' . , k\\' -- _. ._ _ , . 4 ,, , .:A_ , kr,-Jo;.,.-. -i___.,,c_--.1;j 1 }jam, z _ :,`� ,. 1,141v 211_6.„..7.,_.1., . - _ — ,..-. ..-..._ ..ii' ... .0,\ \.,, \ „\' .4„,. , , 2,..,.--;".` _.,0,,. .... _____=_______iii_,rT , - �� ; tr __ t :_ _. , �r "R - 4 4 t 4} t- I. Ipir- iv Area Statistics 4 ' t .r+ ==� , ? ' Total crashes 76 I`� t ^..^ ,! / ® 4 Crashes per mile " — — rot, I , r Goal driveway density' per mile 30 - __ !4 - - j � 4 to Total driveway density per mile 24 w • f 1" } I �; ., y, Dnveway density per m►le EB 1 -,-� - '' I 7 • Dnveway density per mile WB 1, t " _——_1 __ ti - 14 11 ' y� I Driveway density ratio r„ _ ___- _T r 0 FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend gashes �r� Other Side x Pedestrian "1` -� Short Term Raised Median ® Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections�s1 — Can Kuriey+lom S(U • JACOBS 'Deportment _Medium Term Raised Median 1 1 Right Left Bicyclist SCALE 1"=200' ♦ County Boundaries rrr�T�� and 0.5sociales,Inc drrsnspaeaeon City Boundaries _LongTermRaisedMedian 4911.0iii Rear End viiiikp Headon 4 FixedObj League City 38 rs ., _' ... ' .-vihr- Area Statistics 31 a ,1 y 1 _ r F`", •. ) ,�` V �l Total crashes * � , • , . 4 ' 14 i " Ili.41 ! # I Crashes per r , ...`y .:.,t...1 1 'D l ___A< rV ,/ y 1 .-f #Y ' Goal driv eway density per mile 30 f ., ! >s I +,�. Total driveway density per mile 15 ... ..* ••. Wit `" -+rF '`, II I I__ II F1 -'� I Dnveway density per mile EB 1 I r/ " �' 744, 101 ' I »>`/---' Dnveway density per mile WB i y.:. 4_.` ,;.. I III III i t 4 yI1 t Driveway density ratio 0 it t �`-"�`. ,' — 1 =4:0 ckt. .. if r .Ir `Y II I it __ • _ ' 411.',. ** .- ili ..Ak Ilt ‘to _ II 1 a III - i A. ll k \\•,k II I ,, , - 6 , 1 11 {, __ r� II I r 11. . , ,, _ ___„__ , _ _� ti . �_ I I i ,.: it j 410. t.4... ------ -T--r---"rF‘ ,. - I- 4r- � II A 144#1111.4t 4411 ' __.,...____ .,.- , , . . , , _ , I I ^; r + ! - III- —_____ t .. - 0404 Illik..' ,F 7 i.i ,y ._ , - - v '.,M�`'�' ,.� III - -y ' ti -.,,} ti _. _ _=I e I y r i 7 �a il, y MS II' ',I = r+= I II a i _ , - „-.,_ ill - _ __X= _ - �I I� I II �II __ T ' r -` I _ �11 - t 1 ! �. 1 •' .. ' II i-^'1 _�_T - 1 r1i. + ly II I ill li _y I\ I' Ilrilet _i ~ I _r I I r=,,- IVilli Y_ i ii„itI i , i I y , ,... ... aiiiii vii,\,' m ,„ , . --...7.........__.±,_- •.. . i • _ _ i„ , . 1 -14#ILLir 1111-- .. )1, Ilitt-"4f 111 _ _ , , ill vr. . .. i IJl ..� �- r 11 ,.-Y•,�„ ,. - I i I ,J 11 ,s. j t _ --- - }•o r. f 5 I, ; -: . - i . ` - i _ _,,. ,....,.+'+°"� .,. '-` - >;F t 4 " ^r L4" I r •-._ ` `� `y \. T q. - , F yam. ,r. .. ,w y ,. - - 1 - _ - 1 II a. I ` - A. s 1®Y • r '--�- jA - • . i ,, Ie.,. , .. . .. .iiiii, , ,„ t 0 _ a I I • I -,..." . 4 ''.111111411. ,,,,. \ - 1.,_ -. ._ .,.„... ---_____,,- ----I* 46041 -----..:. " . - - 11 ri4)3‘ ..- - _ _____ _----- , , .. ci _____.--- II \ _ 4100. _Pr 1441, A V_ u } - ass s y 1S .. _. 1 iF L 1 i --TI- I II 3is s � 7 1 . • 4 111 II ,i, 1 Iii, - I r e - 1 y L i= r yI 1 . r ' "+t� i + I = r { j fir- 1 I_ I 0 \ 1 ' \ ' 1-4/ 1.....--,==' ,„„ _ .,-... i ____41114 11/4 _ { 1 I -j 'I _r- 1 1 y' 1._ j II '1 , _y-'_-.---j- �I i1 II 1,1 i { ^• f'„�,/ .11 �..y-...1,1 a II ii li a \ilk 4 _00.. 4--1 _ = 11 t I 11 n ,., 1►j1 I r § >Nl_ -' I li=__4 -__--r r�r- r � t _ Y � ��. II - _ 1=_ - - - 11 " III r-^=i' � - ,1 I _r'�� S� - i. tir„ Jr� _ fAfil1 ,._----- i i lid‘ 4} _ I I. • Its II s.'_ # I `. II _�+ - -� _,••.II� +^ _ -11 = 1 • -11 4;. a E 4 .. - rr.. Y t' 1, ii I �. _-- III Ai- • II . owI �_ aII . ,. a (S _ ,eti k so as 3,,- `` 1* _• .- _+ll S , 1y Y. 1y j _1 t 5 1: ttIf t 1• y t1.--- ' \ N . \ /7. _ ! I• 11 -y1 ♦ L� reas... .... 1,,k �I •� f.'-- a. "P _ t -- ..1 - • 't I I�.:- � 1 - ' 11 • I h , _ _�S r 1 - ih""qs -I' ■ • -7 it - 1 t t ..{ . �ir s. 4 1 I FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN -_ Legend Crashes p -.- Texas b11� Other Side Pedestrian Kimley Han G[JNDp �t��p� rrv+xas illllllt■Short Term Raised Median 0 Driveway ConsolidateItt Signalized Intersections } �zt,,,,.t,, JACOBS fTranapartaaan t E. �, and Assaiales lnc Medium Term Raised Median County Boundaries Right Left Bicyclist SCALE 1'=200' _Long Term Raised Median Q City Boundaries Rear End relilibi Headon i FbiedObj League City 39 • r. t 'I. - 4 - Area Statistics _ <� liptivo. 7 ' _ Total crashes 31 ' r ;•: - s- ti w 4l*� < —`� r , ! I Crashes per mile 23 r Amet. �. �. * 40f ,�1 t'4► ,' . ti .� �" 1114 Goal din eway density per mile 30 +�" t Total dr{vewa dense per mile +§�• • 4. .� �. _ Driveway density per mile EB 11 =i'r '111 , 4rP r lid. AO r Driveway density per mile WB 4 II t r /41 ar+i 5 �\ �} x . r do — L Drn'eway density ratio 0.51 1 / -- r t ,#477r,IP, . _ '� . , . . _ .,; y 1,_ ,.,_ 1 ,, . ,,A1141 1 r_______2_,Lisur . I , . ,,---- - i \ ,,... .i .. _ , ..., __ o , ,_...,s. _ lia. . _ • , � � k ,� .~ • 'in--- 1 is - • r^Rt • '' — '' ` - ♦r - _. _ , '1• 'S !� '� 's aM a e.+s-----�--, 101,46 � 44 0.. A ,; 4 ✓l r ''' t '' . T 5 4 ' .4 s t f 1 ill.. t f F x 1 - .1,- . la A -- A%.0-- 4.# * ..- . • - • - - Ili, . ....-!!---- - 1< t • • . : _,..i, . ',.‘ , ' L., ,fir ,�i !jam ♦ �-"�-"�.,r '_. -.:` • ' - -- �lit _� '� I ;si. - lam, 1 , .f "A.r'�__F Illi\ '.�` _ �� ;.. 5; 4,,,,,.......- " A :' ) dy Ai 4 l r ' l _ # _mot i\ l L A `I; ..-�♦' x 1 a '� ' ' ` IV •� �1.- '.r i . r ! +► titi 1 • f j ' , • -.101114 - % - - ..w.,,•-•••••;°4".... .---.•• • l IS °I......°1°\ i .119. I _. �-` . t.it +', _ -. " ,rr.- _-j► t ,fir r i # , z 4, ,, �,s •r ii Ali ....itoy • `� ill _ '„� �,. _. 1 . •. Titiv 41 . ', : j ' ' • .,- :: ,. NiAitl ., - v 4p\ 4__-7---, \ , -. ,-- ..... - , et it , ' '' *46 • . \ 0 . III., \ '111.7"—_ _ ------ -r—' 1 _ _ Li ,i00.4 s ✓ �f A, __ __:.".. } ' .' 4111 '— . '' 110* . *•i'''.f:'-, i , _ r . -; • : ___.' .40.14*'' ..., „0-•''''..r 7 ' . ,I ` i . / . ..ar.,....., ,„ip, ii______..\\ .._______\__A 4 __112.....v; \ 1 _ , k { , _,.... _____----:7;.--"—1, 4 . .,, ' jope :40000, ".. ' . • ' ' ' \Nlitir---1\4' 14 '_.---.---- - ''', : \ .„....--'.--_, t \ .. . - \ _lit...........1 , '1/41. ___-;--------1/2 v.. 11/4 s __-• nip. --- .‘t ; s = ir."- t ,. . b.. ‘ ‘ \ ' "..".."--' ......'le ::::--\.\-1--:-4.411..--:711: 4:' II rdt .41.4erA: —11L:11-1- 7 4\ i'. \''.---1 tCO';ler, ' ',,-"t A tc:,„.., . t •v. , MA, .., .tirOr. ----' . IP. ' 1: l'' ---------- \ '' ----'"---------- 4 VCIY. .4 r } _ ___________:_b_',",,\ ,- -::11---- ' ---- Y y Il �. fif ;r - e - af. .. t - i Y - �_ `_mil - , • fa� ‘1.4 •n' - '��_ FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN it Legend Crashes © — Teca: Short Term Raised Median dieliiiie Other Side x Pedestrian -•-• — ,.. ' 'rmley Huo OUNDA JACOBS Department Driveway Consolidate Signalized Intersections �. I, and Associ�es,Inc i2,«,,,12.. Transportation - _Medium Term Raised Median Right Left Biryclist SCALE 1"=200' immatCounty Boundaries n City Boundaries l Long Term Raised Median , League City 40 Rear Era b Headoe Feed Ob- ii-z- L-,,,„,. ..'". Area Statistics .: ;. - are — ' Total crashes 18 __.foor ICrashes lxr mile 16 \ Goal driveway density-per mile 30 *1111i „ \ ..„..s. _:,'„, Total driveway density per mile 24 IDm eN amr� � density per mile LB I() \ Deav densd} per mile VJI3 14 � Drip eH ay density ratio 0 79 # \ N. ib', �- a -� .$ r - --_. _.- • - 4 \ \\.,, 7 / s• r+ , L • , . ...---77 4 77 � L iek -- \ . ' . :(/),,,It of* * 4\ F 1 _ 9 a� , . IC: t \\(/ r 1 too k ;j \thk s..- - I, 1 . ______,\ , \ -' IS'' 1 rji I*'. \ 40#A 1041111)! ". . - • *A4 \ 111 b p ..i.,',,liSalt'It a . , a, - it �` _ _ _ ....------ .,.. \ . \ ______--- \\ ' ' \ a , Air\-, • 101:0004 .,..- 111.111111PCIlk 111 \, ,, 6 I � Legend Crashes ID •- FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN _i ._, lY deb Other .fib Side X Pedestrian F "' ' Terse - Short Term Raised Median ® Drrvevray Consolidate Signaled Intersections car! KiMzy+iorn i C,UVDq JAGS ,Depart fat _Medium Term Raised Median,�,�,,, CountyBoundaries Right Left . Bicyclist SCALE 1"=200' and Pssociales,Inc •_ M otrrsneporeseo. Q City Boundaries „- 1 _LongTermRaisedMedian League City/Kemah 41 •0� Rear End viiikko Headon 4 Fixed Obi .1 W 4F-r. : . /pi , .- - Area Statistics \ "kb*" ' \ Total crashes 18 "' t. a -. \ Crashes per mile 16 ` 4 i 1i i ! ' : :.\ \ Goal driveway density per mile 30 � At k :'''.1 .:-.1 Ili ir \ Total dmeway density per mile 24 .....—w — \ An,. \ 3 Ihiveway density per mile EB 10 — .. _._,-- — Hanson . \ � \i ).. • �' I Dnveway density per mile WB lq Driveway density-ratio 0 79_ \ s scit , \ N' ... 9„ \ .. . ..r , 1 \\(„-- 1. Ai New signal a ' /\]\ \ \ / , f • .141111t . • C ; la 4 ' t i ...., ,i 11 0. - , \ sk 0\•,.0100.,. **(1\ It 04 „... #, \ \ t \ \ \ . \ s li 4000 e. It* \\ \ a ://,, _ ‘...X. \ \ , -.. g 411111L/ /111111111111r , A S k ', , il\ ' \ \ AfF A' '' - • I \ • N.: ,..e/1 I 1 IP' 01.\ .0k...., - , ‘ \ \ \... , /// \ ' 41, Legend Crashes © .� fl FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN y� I. • Other Side Pedestrian i Short Term Raised Median Q Driveway Consolidate Signaled Intersedions S7 ` ran: r�� Kiniep�ian S G»jQp� JACOBS ,Department ®Medium Term Raised Median County Boundaries _ Right Left Bicyclist ` and Pssc i les,Inc °r r snspo reran Lon Term Raised Median Q Y Boundaries SCALE 1"=200' - ° .�.b Rear End eilibi. Headon 4. Feed Obi Kern a h 42 I til&C Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan AppEndix B Short-TErm ImprovEmEnt DEsigns AppEndix B Short-TErm ImprovEmEnt DEsigns Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan C_I 1 and Kimley-Horn Associates,Inc. B-1 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright®200-1 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc I PLOTTED. 07/26/2004 11.30.51 AM FILENAME, G°\TPTO\IproJect\635917000 FM 518\Analysts\DesIgn Details\desIgn drawings•sh288 dgn 4 I is t i ork "' -A" 7 - • � tMt ' r. 1 i • CIA III4- r 111;411141k"' - - 's' 1• er ‘1101111111 � 1 ,4641 • 288 -- .• i•474:iiirrIllkilliellerPtwil • 4. 010100011 ... �[y�4. ► * - i . ir , . ow if, 11 , ` t I 0 of v, • �a• ► 1 V,11' 11* ow s ' i 14, ... ''' . iiiii 1 • {Ili , . ljCO ellfiro-- .. Ar' t �► (► 4. A f ""t " * p ► r' ti4. . y '. Ili gg .� Iv 11 N*N� ,J� r IF L y F N r 7 N L , r e d 0 . ,.. n p y C.n IICO 40" ill 1 411 •aill. • .0-17:41:10(' 1. it . DM t• �6 _g = yam i, • }. /u,f '1'Ik . rl o p mn3 7 .010 m 3a> - "- ; 1010....:ipo,ii:tire 0. A, ? s y x I o .. t A lit ' S 1 ta..1di SH 288 @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total West Bound Right Turn Lane with Shoulder 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 125 $4.00 $500.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 SY 325 $5.00 $1 ,625.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY 325 $28.00 $9, 100.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 325 $4.50 $1 ,462.50 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 3 $250.00 $750.00 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 TOTALS I $18,537.50 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $21 ,037.50 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 12% $2,524.50 SUBTOTAL 2 $23,562.00 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $4,712.40 GRAND TOTAL I $28,274.40 rf • \to 3 F r ' ' 10.'Ira'lir . IP - ' ,‘. ', V , , MB . • t r ._,� k 10 t'''' N. , ...... K ; 1 w,,A T rl� E , s s till • :: I. '+` ! tt �' it 4 iimpoilimmii giciip 04.44. 14 ' . , ,r)hheili i c .. . . , a 0•NiA. ....._ 406 - - - i1 - FM 518 3 . i • _,. .. , _ ii. T 4 4 •I�lataillalai"fitiffilit •ge I - Ilb.4 I! 44/0 v tlilk,. 41 . O F / . _ • r N PP Ihilli C Q / F ' topiiii. m u, • 1 it i 0 — ii, 14111147. li . i" . a iiii I �„ Kimley Horn * If ob. �� and Associates, Inc p _ - * A - Erpiri.nnp,Pl.nnlrg,.M EnnronrwMal fa.YMnlb L o a 4 •' f p il,o0 vvk nwnrai ui�.Su r.1 s0s ooi iw,isw is[si ta fa_ f t FM 518 Short Term Improvements z ro o k .,--ow-' KJS. DI/t FM 518 AT CR 94 063591T00 s CKO b, :0:6 M59 ', 11/ i lib KJS MI z r !` eat a, O u. Y LW& ,w.cvE0 a, DR NM a u. 07/26/2004 Silverlake Village @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound and Shouthbound Re-Striping 678 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 5 $16.00 $80.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 5 $90.00 $450.00 XXX XXX Signal Timing EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE _ EA 5 $50.00 1 $250.00 TOTALS $5,780.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0. 10 $5,000.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL $6,280.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 12% $753.60 SUBTOTAL 2 $7,033.60 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,406.72 GRAND TOTAL $8,440.32 I ... , . , .: . ,, ,.. .....• ,,,, ..,,,,...,. .,,,-_ ,,,.. _. _ . .,,- , ,.- , . .,. .... , ..; , Xlis , ill r • 01, Wa 1 mart flir' Laiiiip. . Pk com:j t; ,. 1 Llimir, u) ,,. 0 - , . 00L0.0 ,-T.,, 4.71 - 41°- 1:1:111): • 4 wiles ! y. . IP. .11.. \ , . . . ir , - r- . - , „, milimo 4111.10us iv 4110111110 1101111100111110111111 * . . . 444.44110* ,. 40"14 —48;"4""11111111111111111111111J11111111111-4* FM 518 SP, el — ir • o E �.>.. .,"_fir . ' Nil/ ' # 'i 1''41) tV .aret Nal' .101- o N 414, es el III T slit 1 m 1:6 lot 140 a o I 61011 Kimley-Horn . ' 41 � and Associates, Inc a` 1 Enpinwrina.Firmly,.rM Environmxlbl Con3uNnb P Q I MOO Pork[tetra Vlv.,Sul«.I.W PoI Iw.��w 15ri1 \''C' 12" li al 1 Wffferffn ter• „ , f FM 518 Short Term Improvements uw,s, .AiFET Cesrneraw a,o r - o M .111111111111111111111111111111 FM 518 AT WALMART 063591700 - w - - oro S. R.,.w. w w _.i II 41111 MIS iiiii r1 60' FOE NON - EOM ~20 s, mAo a — 07/26/2004 - Wal-Mart (Pearland) @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound and Southbound Re-Striping 678 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 4 $16.00 _ $64.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 4 $90.00 $360.00 XXX XXX Signal Timing EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 4 $50.00 $200.00 TOTALS 1 $5,624.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0. 10 $5,000.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL $6, 124.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $734.88 SUBTOTAL 2 $6,858.88 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,371 .78 GRAND TOTAL I $8,230.66 +w Q e ,, *le CL- w ...< oAC w � W - . y } Q :.-. - M • ;. veers-r t t \ '' I ....I.- .411.....rairrailip,otwoo, \''t\) . -111611111111.11. I siss i - + di MM. a ''�1 ---- Anil FM 518 mop IN 01.Pit A,4x ,er..,id:i • I4 "ir • i . 1 1 \'\11 t gif 4.,,„y Ticlitt, _ l ir el ell t s Il s 4 5 D En Mite '.. m 1 H b ::2CC-) \It *.) IP , „e 2 Q r p m . irk 40 Ef all ' viit imp "' M j o � ill ' E�� and AssoKimley-Hornciates, Inc lie - EnplrwNp.PblxJy,.M Enrhmm.nbl Caruulbnb i . ly P ixim Pa[ri.rai M1Ir..Sinn i•OO m a..i.m 7e261 ` ' � FM 518 Short Term Improvements N , N I- 43 � o KJ��'DM2 063591700n i O U w ...1 .4) anitii„. `. KJS li w IrFM78 AT H06E OT �' 1'-60' E WYE. rxE.a e_ 4 07/26/2004 - CR 94/Home Depot @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price A Total Northbound and Southbound Re-Striping 678 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 5 $16.00 $80.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 5 $90.00 $450.00 XXX XXX Signal Timing EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 5 $50.00 $250.00 TOTALS I $5,780.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.10 $5,000.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL $6,280.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $753.60 SUBTOTAL 2 $7,033.60 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,406.72 GRAND TOTAL I $8,440.32 .... 07/26/2004 103 233 25 AM E.G3\TPTO\lproJect\635917000 FM 518\Analysis\Design Detalle\desIgn drawingsvcul len dgn I/' 1 '' • - . __ _ . _ • ,,. eV .P.r ,41 .1 ' . .K. , . " • • .. st. . ..I- ,7.4"Siliki,' ... 41lik'aai. io,.. ii, 4111111 ', 4•4, AA- • ,' ik 0 Ail • . . .... • :, K • - 9 iv, an. oi. la Ul *AIL I co AbarairiA— - =IP r . II •• it .,_ i . Or ''; '_ 411 111 , , , ,t _ . • I SOW 1- lio • • Mil -I' •b iiitiNcookow\s..... .0 Ikr.. . . ,1- /a • „r. . , . . 416."14 . . .. „a 110, 1..., , • I ., 4 . a 1 I I' 411111110 4 ilr $ 3- NPUIPI•illaa. waffler" ir Nib ... .116114 % IP II 1 I 'tity•-* - — .41110emb-4 OA ilkell111111110111111.- ,hcax_ LIIIMPW' ••••-. AI " ""-.4/011M0100101011W" , , _--------------_ lipalrION "ligr. ‘ ,,- ..... ..., 41--- 440 ------------r-e—y Iv N]iino s 9 8 Vd .. . . - ------7---------7-4101i' :!...111111/, -- ....---- __. k: , --. , ——•110V*1111'-1r - IN011111rA, .a %A_ • 434- , ..i•i.,,'„. 111-".,a J'''r. i,1*,4ia...4,;._A1 19;.'.,''‘•:. -_. .. • ,,, I 4: i % ... . . 1 4,a . ..; 101..•0 6.911a.111•4140"...9- . - •. ..- .. • 1;1'. • . 94.••••1-9•0•01199110- -a •• • . 4111V4 .. - ••••• _., 0. . .. le i . t ,.. Of A v r—orworar•ia*--44,4 • `401 • 1 .. . . • , . r •.- kr_..., •_ . . e . .'. lir .44,Tir4'4i# 7 AP.. Jr _.1k!ot.N.- - • , . t .6, . Ar. . `ik Iiiii I ..1 1 1 i i li 4 ., . _ .. . ;IPIII4' , , , vi . ' ,, ,. • , . 1 , .4 1114 111` .9,PlInq -A II - " cn . ,..:‘,] 0 ,,. m i n. , . i CD z —c 1.0 0 < 1 CD D CD ! 1 (D 3 P a cn a) - = i a awl OC) , 0 w g FM 865 Cullen @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound and Southbound Re-Striping 678 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 2 $16.00 $32.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 2 $90.00 $180.00 XXX XXX Signal Timing EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 TOTALS I $5,312.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.10 $5,000.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL $5,812.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $697.44 SUBTOTAL 2 $6,509.44 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,301 .89 GRAND TOTAL I $7,811 .33 0 Oil r ., 7 INV 14 . f M c-)... . 21111:. , - i • iOP \11:1;11.- . lk ir Ail 41 ji i‘lk 9 lea." 41,1 4091.411 4\ ' • , $ " I 0.1 \ ii 4piti dr. .. AIM 411111161.1111 FM 518 0 E w 3 S ' 1 P$4;CWF*14. Jl 3f4'�-.44 ill o to 1.9 ,41 .,,, r t, illik?. III 44 1.- #—ebe. AM ::14 i, ,,, ,,,, 'Pr 44 4 411111111111111iis + I s ' Kimley Ho E� m and Associates,ates, Inc i II et 1 2- l..y�,rli ' 1 I Y •�- EM«nnp Planning.na Evmmnm.nhlc.n.ulbnM1 4. /ffitii =remit LO O.O rt,_- r ;_ : - - kw 518Term Improvements I .. .. IlL AB AO Short .' ' - f KJS. DMR FM 518 AT FM 1128 (CULLEN/ 063591700 0 0 1 I am am fwr; S i i. KJS w a f . A rwe Fa NO 1— Z 0 w ,.,. *►.. ! • :. * ---- ----_ --_--- DIMl60' wvnovru fr, y r to e o LL 07/26/2004 — FM 1128 @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound Right Turn Lane 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 100 $4.00 $400.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 SY 150 $5.00 $750.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY 150 $28.00 $4,200.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 50 $4.50 $225.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 3 $250.00 $750.00 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 TOTALS I $11 ,325.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $13,825.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 12% $1 ,659.00 SUBTOTAL 2 $15,484.00 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $3,096.80 GRAND TOTAL I $18,580.80 PLOTTED. 07/26/2004 I1.32.35 AM FILENAME.G.\TPTO\'project\635917000 FM 518\Analysis\Design Data!Is\design drawIngs4sh35 dgn e - 101. i ' :Ili 1114 t . . A -I . 1 I 5 1 r, # yi . .10P „ ilko. . - 1 l" - illiiw I Wo,. *NM AO ft.. le 114 0414 _, . ., . , 1,- 49. • 41 4 0 ll I ..., 411 ' I,WO s or 0 , iiiii b , ,.... , „ *. /IP —ZIPlit' - II . 4. t if illii ,.may► tali -ail) ,,.,i. $ 'a .,ri 'ICJ AIM 1440y, , SH 35 mio -.f 44110 41111 41. t_tb , . . �, Ida. libi 111 ,___ A a 1.-- _ , 4-ib it " I-1k IA if" s' lit a ii 11 ..,4 I ill 400•0110111emmill. ZUNI Jh III o CD I S ems . rimy 0111`..., Ili _.;,,,„_ I ) * : li II orit I 4.44 - *. . , 1 1 4 11 • ill " ay "11444p.4 ___ . Slii)lkairi 11141411111 ilko „,,, A.,,iii.:0„.. vir. , .... . ..... , - ,., , ...., .. , ,1111 imati Nib oft 41., J_- L in N Ila N@;ncl, � 3 \ O ; o E i i n 80 1 II ci) S } o N11 nm =p3 =y� Na o = i a -, 2 n I F 3 0l p p 1�d r. 0 SH 35 @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Westbound Right Turn Lane with Curb and Gutter XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 300 $4.50 $1 ,350.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 1 $250.00 $250.00 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) LF 250 $3.00 $750.00 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 110 _ $4.00 $440.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 SY 115 _ $5.00 $575.00 360 528 _ CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY 115 $28.00 $3,220.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 200 $10.00 $2,000.00 TOTALS I $13,685.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.25 $5,000.00 $1 ,250.00 SUBTOTAL $14,935.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $1 ,792.20 SUBTOTAL 2 $16,727.20 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $3,345.44 GRAND TOTAL I $20,072.64 PLOTTED. 07/26/2004 11.05.44 AM FILENAME. G.\TPTO\I project\635917000 FM 518\Analysts\Design Detal Is\design drawings•o I dal vIn dgn c 94 iiik r 9 1► + r it ••/ . 1 ior, ,.. liglito ,.. osr a 0 116444.4%. 411 i 4: pit a le; 4/1 +AM aw j • 4016 iii, iiiiiio g -,*---i 110‘14.46404„....4•1001! ) ,1 i 111,44 /IP ,, fltpi ' ; w ` -i rT' ..se Ai s iv iii rik- 01, till/ , 111, . if r ■ x + i �\y j b a '• /\ Al ..illi. '"1111 - ir 4 icespoole......d.Pill 2 '1:::'‘.e-..!..'- . 11, -,14- .atc40:.74,4,4: i . ..r.., 1 ... ..., ....4.. ..iiii 11111( Y '11, ti.e '. h „ >r' iiiii. . ar rI .1.T..s- - — _ 41. � I1 •N 5 e- - Q+ N 2. L O A O -n 1 n . , a 11 p E u p. 7 d N _ < =N g CD 8 3 a a) 9 E N F 7 a1 &p I Ra 8 0 gE,a 0 0 Old Alvin @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Westbound Right Turn Lane with Curb and Gutter XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 300 $4.50 _ $1 ,350.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 2 $250.00 _ $500.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) LF 150 $3.00 _ $450.00 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 55 $4.00 $220.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 _ SY 90 $5.00 $450.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY 90 $28.00 $2,520.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 150 $10.00 $1 ,500.00 TOTALS I $7,090.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.25 $5,000.00 $1 ,250.00 SUBTOTAL $8,340.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $1 ,000.80 SUBTOTAL 2 $9,340.80 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,868.16 GRAND TOTAL I $11 ,208.96 '' •••• .9`'."-- .,,, 4 le. " f`'1� i; h# w il y p4 O. all ill vilk 14/6,,, C 41111 'rr iiii...6 4141411141/10 % iliki - o4 ' go FM aill S78 T `% 41r i jibI. "alit . �'�rl.. f. ♦ • 1 rt of").... v 4.:\i•. : - - ' ;.. I 'Y ♦ �"- r +�' F 1 • ' "!' I ;. .. . n v L orriN 4.siiitifilA... n C ill v EA 0 v C 4114144. e N 0 O CAA 1 Li O 11 . 4,.. ite 4. w , >, 0 '' # ii ._. , . . . 8 .4 ' C 4.. # 'Piot . � M . F —rl Kimley-Hornand Associates, InEnym«nna ai...mo..a E.w�.m«m c«.uN O " - �4s #_cr)inn �c.,tra ori....wi..ieoo oa a..r..> rsn \ FM 518 Short Term Improvements AO 2 \ M«N BY• 9EET gESLB'PINM Jb me \ / dl� P - - B sT-'�' KJS. DMR FM 518 AT PEARLAND PARKWAY 063591700 - �:: CM 9h Fla«YEi LT, KJS a• 4 07/26/2004 - Pearland Parkway @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Westbound Right Turn Lane with Curb and Gutter XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 300 $4.50 $1 ,350.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 2 _ $250.00 $500.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) LF 250 $3.00 $750.00 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 115 _ $4.00 $460.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 SY 325 $5.00 $1 ,625.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY 275 $28.00 $7,700.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 TOTALS 1 $14,985.00 Eastbound Right Turn Lane with Curb and Gutter XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 300 $4.50 $1 ,350.00 XXX XXX `PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 2 _ $250.00 $500.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) LF 250 _ $3.00 $750.00 110 501 _EXCAVATION (RDWY) _ CY 115 $4.00 $460.00 276 526 _CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 _ SY 325 $5.00 $1 ,625.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") _ SY 275 _ $28.00 $7,700.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 TOTALS $14,985.00 441 .. -- - . . . .... „. .... ..-.4 , _.. . .. _ .- . ... - - 0 .. . . , . - • . .....- ... "49. . iit ' .' . - ..... - • r: .,. - . , 4 at ji,_ ,•'" 4,14•- • 4.. - . ‘.40- . . ... . . , ,•,, ... 10 i AL . . .._ _ , ,... . . •' 41 ., ..: - , r 1 .• Mk • Ilk 41111 111%, A"11 S 7 8 it c or. _, irr „4111110 "Ilk I 4 dill 11:41111111' 47.. 411 l'"' _. -•4114'. ., .. 1. a ' IS ilk Aillk 10 ..... 4 .2 _i- ll 11111115411.17 11.. 1111111 °lite , ; 4 44 P'I, r _ 111••• • 40 , A ' ,i. \ -•,,,,,), 1 1E4 k• * ' , IP. ”•• .. , . 41110 41: i .., ,. 1 ..! - ;A. . 1 Allit, , -• '7,,'--ft 4 le i f . .„„ . ,L tilt iiikar • $ ' 6.1 gbh 41 , .. , . . . ...-pqraite ,,, .... .., vb._ ... . .. , .. 7, 2 - • 0 . 4444 . , .. . fiiii .. .. , 4 . . y, 411111610 41 .. . .-t i• gok. 41111 . I.. e _ V*I 14/4 _ .. _. • . ... ' . _A ' -NIMIL fa o M 4 - •r-. c -jilt Ai jsb,"' i I - >0 e cn .1 P ..2 ir . 1 ' 4.; I P i L llp • • ., 1.e) S \/... .1.5) . A et' - : . - • '*"1 * 4.4 . . . . ._ „ Ake-, " - I AL • LI .. , CO / 41#4'-'4 . • L71 ... 4 44ti , - . I w .,.. 'L Wil o . 1 /i. / i- . I a ' . A 4110.11,-.4110 •E N -jpi,l .0g81.,ig .0 1.., r i ' . i F.., . , Emi n Kim ley-Horn- .. I 4. Alb 004."411141itior:aat' and Associates, Inc . ,. . .14 . 4t11.1 414111141111110 Englaming.Planning,and Enrinnianntel CAMINO • 0 — 0 .., • ..- N 0 4111100-111r4 41)4 WOO Pst,c•ntral Orly.Sate MO Pal Is.Teas 7301 _ t0 0. filik, - 4IP tj '''''''r''' FM 518 Short Temi Improvements JIM Ile A. re 10 * ,.... , • * - * . KJ S• DM FM 518 AT LIBERTY 063591700 ‘• 1' . , - L 6114*.4. lk i jor lb olio Asp, , • „....... .. . lig * L .. KJ S LZ /41/ 1 Allhi.A M ' . -. . Ile WIEN nE 4 I— ,,, .... .. lit •411,11 .41: ' . I.= 07/26/2004 60' o -, /1111 Ala _."Ilik..7 43111111i Nild.o4 - mr. NIIIDTO ff, SKr- AO , a , Liberty/Country Club @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Westbound Right Turn Lane with Curb and Gutter and Re-strip Northboun and Southbound XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 250 $4.50 $1 ,125.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 4 $250.00 $1 ,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 4 $50.00 $200.00 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) _ LF 250 $3.00 $750.00 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) _ CY 150 $4.00 $600.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 _ SY 350 $5.00 $1 ,750.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") _ SY 325 $28.00 $9,100.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 678 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 2 $16.00 $32.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 2 $90.00 $180.00 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 4 $50.00 $200.00 TOTALS I $22,437.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.25 $5,000.00 $1 ,250.00 SUBTOTAL $23,687.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $2,842.44 SUBTOTAL 2 $26,529.44 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $5,305.89 GRAND TOTAL I $31 ,835.33 r / , i . ir ' .x _ e e _ . .., , 7ff, 0 Ai , ?.. . f , . P. nor ` - \r t d.'41: 111‘ 4. , . _, xs., ---,4411, , 10 A 4-41, S.4'111‘ / -.... ft el ruitholit, 4 . . . , P. ti r,. 9.4),N ,.- P,,11160 T...., dip 4\ ,,,i0 I :, _ , wf ) --r. 4401111400:/sil,iit . .t iFt ' Co. 4 -.1 ' 410. ;• • sr. .. • . "LN I I I p*' ,.-. iki 41,1 , • lip . sir i o el - A,,. L zII 16N, ilii �; �� . .0 .. e i ik tr. a L Ilk ,, 4 , �4 At t oic".o ,„4 . .. ... . i , I z a c t41111\11/14t L, * w iv_ ,-„ ... ,,. - 114,411p A .c7, ' . . . ift I% >, a i'_ m s .# % a 8 I Iik>1111111141111k N i Kimley-Horn o : �� U and Associates, Inc ° * `s L - Enpimmrp,Planning,and EnnronmYnbl Cannibals d 2700 Pork Control ort a0o m t zs N O ,.. w.w,M —_ to a A . FM 518 Short Term Improvements MS AO __ o G - i '� _ . KJSs DAR FM 518 AT FM 235'�ir�(EDGEWOODI 063591700 GPO d. RE AMIE. o M , '„s.l i KJS w a !, xwe 'ne w. w - - :� �- '� _ > 1--60' APE. MMNEO tr. .M b a LL 07/26/2004 — FM 2351 /Edgewood @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price - Total South East Bound Right Turn Lane 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) LF 200 $3.00 $600.00 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 95 $4.00 $380.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 SY 400 $5.00 $2,000.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY 350 $28.00 $9,800.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 200 $10.00 $2,000.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) I LF 50 $4.50 $225.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 1 $250.00 $250.00 TOTALS $15,255.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $17,755.00 MOBILIZATION 10%) LS 10% $1 ,775.50 SUBTOTAL 2 $19,530.50 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $3,906. 10 GRAND TOTAL $23,436.60 PLOTTED. 07/26/2004 11.36.52 AM FILENAME.G.\TPTO\I project\635917000 FM 518\Ana lysts\Design Detal Is\design draw ings«WhisperInc p Ines.dgn , ilk 'ill441116111.161°111.1 .1111110/11fotarlditt t ,. ,-,, r. .... ,. 11 _ UP , , 4' let' ', 41141 - .411". '449' , ' "1". ' .AI .' ., 411 -. 410 0111 ill - ,,,,,r&i*.. --.444' - a illi40‘,4° AP.f —_ is -4111. jaliallo +dMriM rr air- - 4 - 1M r71,110 J r f f mr +• - - _ 7� 7pipo ro II Ni N0 4 ' i not c 9 C', O O C 1 ❑ ; ! 11r 7 co i 3 ❑ m 0 � 11 P- i R Ia3 z 3 73 ` 0 = o 700 mmi N3 S a.--.- c CD ._M c 17 D A Et�6 0 0 Whispering Pines @ FM 518 Estimat Item Code Description Unit e Price Total Southwest Bound Left Turn Lane 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 200 $3.00 $600.00 132 503 EMBANK (DENS CONT)(TY A)(CL 3) CY 15 $4.00 $60.00 251 683 REWORK BASE MATRL (TY B)(CL 2) SY 200 $5.00 $1 ,000.00 432 501 RIPRAP (CONC)(CL B) CY 10 $28.00 $280.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 200 $10.00 $2,000.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 2 $90.00 $180.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 150 $4.50 $675.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 TOTALS $4,895.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.25 $5,000.00 $1 ,250.00 SUBTOTAL $6, 145.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $614.50 SUBTOTAL 2 $6,759.50 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,351 .90 i GRAND TOTAL 1 $8,111 .40 el.fs is , ,r � I :-.4frili : > I 4p tOP, A1,, oe ikk tit k_52_, ; 0, i rillilli!! - .. tl :11':',::4 IP lit. � /011 . \ .. .... .* - if _ lielt .' , jai.* :.....41°ki 111444.• 11:441%ii:(11 • o11 ff, K . 41411* Nil ' it ' Ark Or Ilk ilk VI - e" ii, r • 04. oak Ai of ,.... .c . . IIIN - O N � R # E eiLlik C i D -, ..../ . , • i N t V se Imo „i„ # 1 111;k1te; / ..- ilk r , , iiiiko,' , ., . N PI* 5k A di • , 4, A0 ' r . f , 1. 1 . Ill w , / n F \ A . 111;0414 t ? imley- orn 2 -i• [� and Associates, Inc ! of _ E Pbnni E Enviionm.nYl Lonwlbnb O ` # i.r' ~ z3oo vorx Antra oriw wtM iwo wi iw *aw m3si inwnn .n , . t !� �'�� FM 518 Short Term Improvements N H , JOB MI . wz ss, s M 528 . o - " , _: '� ,, # . DM2 FM 518 AT (PARKWOOD) 063591700 FILE MAlet w . _ilk w a •5 A� uvs PIE. o w , 5' ,. Alit 'fit,.. -Ai 1"=60' O -J - OPb MPIWFU d. , .O 0_ 4 07/26/2004 - FM 528 Parkwood @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Southwest Bound Left Turn Lane 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 20 $3.00 $60.00 132 503 EMBANK (DENS CONT)(TY A)(CL 3) CY 15 $4.00 $60.00 251 683 REWORK BASE MATRL (TY B)(CL 2) SY 150 $5.00 $750.00 432 501 RIPRAP (CONC)(CL B) CY 10 $28.00 $280.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 350 $10.00 $3,500.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 2 $90.00 $180.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 700 $4.50 $3, 150.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 2 $50.00 $100.00 TOTALS $8,080.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $10,580.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $1 ,058.00 SUBTOTAL 2 $11 ,638.00 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $2,327.60 GRAND TOTAL $13,965.60 � ... , t ... • _ , - .. q 1 700 -00.0011%. , • , .is'► 6 t •., .• 11.141 1 i. r .. \silikH r 4-0 L. 0 A jos* _7..r.., )1. : ''4 16 - , • .. ill, ill It a r a<a -d t, a . ,, ,_ _57, (53 lik. * ' ...•0, e ' , i I), . , -1 1 I to.1 h. ' , Ilk .. ,•., . , . • 010, • di* A it r z :: : , ... OP °m di s 0 AVm . -"iv--- - - „,,,- We 3 _N-4-. . \ / , illihk, O i, L C " Or° r _ )14 . . r-,-' . . r i- + _ 8 r 42 E i•totir. 1 Hn >i , x M '' y y T Q 1111111Iii lt) ta R r U. 1 0 CD ` ON o + 011010141.-• .V Alt ,y, V.\- Kimley-Horn •* E�❑ and Associates, Inc 0 ' • • - Enpineanng,Planning,end Environmental Consultants k irT , 12700 Farts Centro Dr l v Su 110 BOO Dollars T•oa• 75351 N PIALUELT TITLE, = s' • FM 518 Short Term Improvements V a- • i OHM'S 6, SHEET QESCRIPTAMY JOB AG o , �!{ ' - f ., _ KJS. DMR FM 518 AT BAY AREA BLVD 063591700 w — . _ M1 KJS Fla LIME, s'- Ap 3LXE, FILE Atli I— z 1 . 601 I- J Z. e WE, MPROEO Elh SIC NO. a L.... - - - a di t - - - 07/26/2004 — Bay Area Blvd @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total West Bound Right Turn Lane 104 513 REMOV CONC (CURB & GUTTER) LF 250 $3.00 $750.00 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 110 $4.00 $440.00 276 526 CEM TR BS (STRGT-O)(TY D1 OR D2)(GR6)6 SY 325 $5.00 $1 ,625.00 360 528 CONC PAV (JOINT REINF)(6") SY _ 275 $28.00 . $7,700.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) I LF 250 $4.50 $1 ,125.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (ARROW) EA 2 $250.00 $500.00 TOTALS I $14,640.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $17, 140.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $1 ,714.00 SUBTOTAL 2 $18,854.00 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $3,770.80 GRAND TOTAL I $22,624.80 PLOTTED. 07/26/2004 II•09.38 AM FILENAME.G.\TPTO\I project\635917000 FM 518\Analysis\Design Detal Is\design drawIngs♦Palmeto dgn T i i ._ ,, • ..- .1141111-- - '• / ..Oil': _ Alpr 00 i,,II.. 4• j`-f a? ,., f dilli -I: •S 'r re A d ' eye----.."-----<1.e-,.: „ "-• • 11 . 6u!PL10, 6v I ? 'i .,1r oft A ' ''''', ighi. 411N--- -- iy -1111, 11 . ik 61: 44411:1‘ • br- if „Ir. _ . • • IOW Jo. - . ,N .,..„.. . „,„.,.it .... • .•liry F � lir - 4118r S _ N L 8 a F , ! 11� Y _ = P O t 1 s CD $ Sa f9 d W'< -1 'O p2 o p, 3 n O 8 a 9..., O 2 ) 11/13 7 O 6 8 n IN a aSii Ud 0 p CI r 0 0 Spring Landing/Palomino @ FM 518 Item Code I Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound Left Turn Lane 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 15 _ $3.00 $45.00 132 503 EMBANK (DENS CONT)(TY A)(CL 3) CY 10 $4.00 $40.00 251 683 REWORK BASE MATRL (TY B)(CL 2) SY 115 $5.00 $575.00 432 501 RIPRAP (CONC)(CL B) CY 10 $28.00 $280.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 250 $10.00 $2,500.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 6 $90.00 $540.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 500 $4.50 $2,250.00 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 4 _ $50.00 $200.00 678 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 4 $16.00 $64.00 TOTALS $11 ,494.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $13,994.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $1 ,399.40 SUBTOTAL 2 $15,393.40 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $3,078.68 GRAND TOTAL I $18,472.08 - iiiii .. .71 Fos ii 4ff t ni r iirit fr Ai*t ligir - -1r . . 11 r .. . - 4 ' / et, ii, ... 4- .46 1.1k. ti"-"4 , ►; „poi' 741"tr- __ _._ . ., .. ._ A . 40 ' . *till 141" 41 t ' . 4111111°F • l ' '� _iitf 4. t.- . , i . • •• . irial,. . . ,I24 7 '- ."' • ill • Filliiiii1C11. ne way nor .. , -4000:el : . th li McLean o j !• f .110A liolooi%Apo ar i Iiiii..00. Opilipiii* i , . Iiir ✓ '; li 1 -11 004- ' . . ... .. ••• -A it . ) } _- /- , " O .., ... ., �....-. ,. ter-._ • CP • Sm VA V - .- o 0 to .1 " w ` x Kimle -Horn E I: r+ and AssociatesY , Inc ✓ a• - lill 4 - • 7 lIV _ Er rri^7,Merv*"and&Am on;Co t. Web N O - ll ' L , 1,II£ IS,W�a%cwlfral Rlw.SUIM IKO Illa l FM 518 Short Terrn Improvements \ r N ~ - • / Yt�ll A� 51LEf QE9tliIrON AY q • - qanALaideldididie Jill R 1.4 ^ KJS. DNR FM 518 AT MCLEAN 063591700 ce ie. ri£,vrc e. Halbert/McLean @ FM 518 Item Code Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound and Southbound Re-Striping 678 _ 521 PAV SURF FOR MRKS (BLAST CLN ARROW) EA 2 $16.00 $32.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) EA 2 $90.00 $180.00 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 4 $50.00 $200.00 TOTALS I $5,412.00 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0. 10 $5,000.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL $5,912.00 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 10% $709.44 SUBTOTAL 2 $6,621 .44 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $1 ,324.29 GRAND TOTAL I $7,945.73 I * 4111F .5 AIN • % t5)61d 145 t , o ilik"mom , 4, \11,... s + - I ei 1.4, I is 4 i. ., • FM 518 .:, , - ___-- -II ' •4 ill o 0 ., 4r iiiiewestat i i CONI/ - i. 1i w / , li %., w � 3 w �, M 1, 4� r , 0., it r i 1 4 00 er- 104 '• 4 P Ail" r 4s, -• e s + �, •A . •6 Kimley Horn .14.�e _. i 51 . - j and Associates, Inc. OL _ �• - -4 - ,� Erpinwrp,i4nnMJ,and Fnnnes,CIn c. a. P n ♦- 7/A y ii _i r`.♦- M Imo pan Caere!tries.sums ion • 4 _ w _ - " . + wr • • i FM 518ort Term Improvements a� Sh 791318/7718 ww s, a ci 'a r ;" I KJS. DKi FM 518 AT HARKEY / OOAY 063591700 _ aro r, roc�w[. S CI lit Aft ..4 . .4l+ 1► �_ KJS 2 n - � , - -talk _ xwc, FILE�a P LI aJ LT- mE ,rnwven s. Siff la07/26/2004 - Harkey/O'Day @ FM 518 Item Code I Description Unit Estimate Price Total Northbound Left Turn Lane 110 501 EXCAVATION (RDWY) CY 20 $3.00 $60.00 132 503 EMBANK (DENS CONT)(TY A)(CL 3) CY 15 $4.00 $60.00 251 683 REWORK BASE MATRL (TY B)(CL 2) SY 70 $5.00 $350.00 432 501 RIPRAP (CONC)(CL B) CY 10 $28.00 $280.00 529 502 CURB & GUTTER (TY II) LF 500 $10.00 $5,000.00 666 513 PAV SURF FOR MRK TYI (W) (ARROW) I EA 4 $90.00 $360.00 XXX XXX PAVE SURF PREP & REFL PAV MRK (SLD) LF 325 $4.50 $1 ,462.50 XXX XXX SIGNAL TIMING EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 XXX XXX REMOVE REPLACE ALUMN SIGNAGE EA 4 $50.00 $200.00 TOTALS I $12,772.50 BARRICADES, SIGNS, AND TRAF HANDLE MO 0.50 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $15,272.50 MOBILIZATION (10%) LS 12% $1 ,832.70 SUBTOTAL 2 $17, 105.20 MISCELLANEOUS & CONTINGENCY (20%) LS 20% $3,421 .04 GRAND TOTAL I $20,526.24 100 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor Access Management Plan AppEndix C Signal SystEm Maps Appendix C Signal System Maps Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan ❑_ 1 and Assodey-Hor Kimln -II 1 ates,Inc. G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Corndor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc I'M Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan AppEndix C Signal SystEm Maps Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan C-2 1 -----,---,TF-7., L_--------1- ___. ___ -- .. .. -1.• ,-,--- , _...-. - - 1 ..... -...-„, ......,.... ' ri'••'. -1 I I i 7...• -._ ../--- •-.. :4,„:- '.,,•F ...... / .,\ 1 -____ --- -7-7-77- __-- ___-- .----T ___ _•-- -. f ff.. ........- •III•MI. '''' .. .'1' 11111.3..' ....V.".... ...,...:01.:"...:f.,. ..." \.% III .':?!:.:' %.......e.' .......".i' \ %-A-4i ' ...'....‹.-. ' ' .%..... ..... ... . '‘.^'''' I •••••'It.' .1-.::,....7'..'%•-,...1-. \ 4/11111fr :I...••• a , •.-' _.• . r_.....:,:_.• t.„..._:..-7-71,- ,- -- ---. .. -14 -• - 1 ...4-.. •-.s -.7. ••• -- - 4 -....'...• •.. . . , I ---_-,-- _4_ ....., i,,...,....f.i 1,-...;....---1- 1-----,,, 71 ' 11 ciAlt--"-t---_-/- "--. .e•••,-.;4\::-••,\-.;k., _ 1 -1-1--1- 1 .1.E52,' I.- 1 ,.....1 _ _._ It!!1*., ‘._ 1. J--- .11l/FIReaMierer cam C Fra '1 *nail. ...>"•;:y\N")- '''•'fe/....'•- N. . •- •, ....., -. ••• . . . . -• -. - I .--- Brook .40, .. r.....rry. ..j.C:-...".:::.-\416 ..,,,,,....\,SIIIIIIIIkp. J it ..-. "-,* • ' • I 1 .._ ••••••••••7 , I 1 ! F.„mo..dt 1 .... 1 II IF_ fiejl.., I F. alp CorneWe j , ..t,-- •••••• 1 1 ''.. 144_,-- II ....J--r ---,. ..!'....; '•::.,..' ••: ./ -I., ... .:"{„..,J_ •.,.11 '.... ,. • r . r I r ,...____ ..• ..,=,.... ......e.-_,----- <N) .„-....,,.... -.....-,, y ...< IF- % 1------ G-"" _____:__ ___ Ram :___I-, • • ' '.,e'r 1...,,,-..,r1,.•,., k,,,,:..',7'..."-. ..--._ .....%:.• 1_.... mo. .. _ -/..‘,..,.... ,Ill..?;•-i.'i •-•':., • .• I ......, 1 I.,• ,,„ 1.„., ., 1 Dee t - / %a WM.77- I, i Iri Ceddrod ron 17.7) I S'''' -_C-1 I Mak ! 16eler ---•-•- .d. -.• ----1( -? r*--J.. k••-"?. -I I T ga Canton'. 1 1 1 ../ •.,„. .. 4:1,,:.1. . ' / 6 al . `-'7-• 1-it•-•-". ',.:7.-1- `b, l• *.c.,,. /lifIr- KW* = Robc-71. -nue 1 Shame lerellr I I .• .•-... ..• L___ .. t.&1"-L-•-•-- ----a Is,,,o,d..,,„.1 . ..1 . li •.,. .. '--/-:::-.17 i I--,,- .F.19 -WI 1 .1:-- - il g OrRedna_ MorsEl^d i lei b 1 • de/ • e .... i . P ° 11 - Cie Stone n'er_.1 1 IP Z4'VII ....' ••.' r ...„.„, '77', 1 I I . /1.:... . .......• ' ....... •-y,1 i _316'dr „ . . 136MenATI .''... .-•.„,m,„; R "7 • • 't . I ' 1..i r ...• . r----.7. ( F I- 3 •=--.-.... I ...... .1- 1. i • Eil ..... ,.. - 7: ., 7"..-1°.• • . . . ,.. ,. .. . .. -,- • I/ 'N• •:' *.....-- , , ..., .1-. I ... •. -- •• I ---- , ... • i 11 ••• -•II ie 0 ' , C:lki. 6 .„.., .,•, 2....42:_lemparere ......... ••.„.....-..._4.,,,..-. . , I ''''•-. .••• '' 1 I Or ,\ 4e41? •-•--../.-'...4 ,./••I'.' ,s,e„.•i I. • •ol •;bk'.... As.„'.... 17 ..e. .. . ,. , • ,..,.,rz,.;,./-:„ ,...,47 -y,........c.r .'A , 1 . I 1'4 1 - • , . . 2 Nol• ___ 11.7%• ••66 ,:,:". ... e:t 1:.;55. ; ____44te le-- ••':' lyi,'.1.---4. -7../. ..s, •-:,.. .f.. ...-,;" Att;:.--7'-‘' _. ••"‘;'e."4/..../..47,$-..-:•,:lti 14,.\:-.5%,./' .4%.1,..et;i• --„._ 1 • g A . . ,..‘,/ -TR+. .....,..., - '.:If. --,• 4-' . / tr ':!,!;.''.. _t_ 153, / , __ ..,,,,,...,. .. , ..._ •..,..... : , , ..... . ,.. „ t6. 1 1,,suseka . ..,.., ..e / /..:_:....72'f---::/ '\•....*•;-:: - ,Altd,W1;tekfr , ..___ igm! : 1 N7----- / 1 I _ 1 - _ I .8 -r-11--j- IL-{ 1 ' 1141 ,F.larel , . • ,. • • I .- • ,_ . _ . .„...... . Jel • ee---i '.II • ' -‘ gt6, -; 41%111011 1 .1 ."-•-•`... •c-(1.1\:'S "Hi , I I I -1 .1 i ',.: T I I 1 ' I •-4;0411-•111111r,‘"-*: N..' --:•14.!•2,4 , •;_. • 1 •--r7 4. 7 --' ' . I 4. RIF, , ''''''Am" Meesol• \Harland ..%!...110:::• ,.'-... ( 6 -"\<•.....<- .1... / 'el"' •:''''4.--•I s.'`' •'. ..•.'5' '?" 4.- .... L-7--4 , . ._---0--- •.. .• •... , ‘-l' N 1 < / ./ 1.-.•'. ''''''7"-- 77."7- ••••'4, ., ",..„,. , Alt/ .? ..-::• /--"At•-•;7:,1 '77.: '71 i:' '4. : - 0 , -....7,..Larl•-•-''': 5e.. 1.6ernolle ..... '\\ .• 1 1 I _1 I 9:4'..4..4. .::::'.. ,e.-..• -. ' ._, - , I - --t-r' 4.6. - ,, N, PineeYd.d ' 1111 7 ..4...., -M _ I 6'84. I r--7.Tr 1 ' s.0 h F.eK g_1 1 a .S---z_...H- t 1321.4n mem:NM 1 Liairbedlay Colonial eel Gem .'• T... il -_I.--___ ' ,it::s'.•,...wb.:4s,,....s,,,4••....k::::zw,v.?:e;;:::."7'j•,...,::::;7:_l.,./',X.e.:: / ?•#-'...s: ..,z,N t.,-..te,....°---N,..et i / •fo• gfr -.....:'-/q%,:t.•/""--...2,0!„,t:‘P -.... ..- 1.I ,. ,•• - -,-....- ,•.,. .. -1...,•-•• if -41.4;-‘4...... ., ,. c- ,[4:54 ..__I Li.... L -----1- --11' -=-4-11-I - \*.i ...":::::...f;t_...k.......1-11 ,,,,,„,e7. E.. e----- F---- - ......._- Meade. arcierned, .-- __.. 7 _....- ..., , ...*,,,/ .!,,,,,, r.7-.,..A.4 rer e .:•,:.:.. ,. iy J1/4"- cy "..\-••„. 1 .9'-'g. ..* 1 II m• ''' ' '- 1 61-7rit..7- i-r2„..4-- ,..,_F--. 7.1,1 .Thri --17:ra_ _,,.‘, , 1-- 1-- ....... ......, R._ 1 Sldreke Cd". -Inn mi r ma • klall,. i ; TiaT I 1'1 \ '... .4 , .....,, %.: • ye: / '4.. -,-, --,--•.N.... ,•,--...N. -....\\>,---. *i ..., , . .. . . ,I . 1 1 , ;- -..---, 1.--• _.- . ..._vL„._,...., FRamerimod I \ .., J.' 1 . r %."1 r, ,.• '%.7:•••\' ,s, ›.' 1 II ___,----.... rr------ . '...s.... •-:... ..:.:",„ --•?.*„... •' -........// ......... ...... • i 400 I .....,..., g - 1 4,,,. - ' .....- rg....., _.-- . . .. .. .. ., ,.... r_c , ,..... ..%c ,..: ... ...,... ...,........ ___. '. , _ --- .. .,. 4..." • / _ . . . . Coolertedal / (11 '' .. '', -4,../ I I -I I ran I 1. Werelmood"If:.7-11 - li rg 4 Pmee E 0 tynd 117-' Mc nee Peri II.:- Grace Amle 115 1 .il ----=1 -76erens uthl 117.7A.. - Tbm"--- 1--- t _.-- ---Jek li • .,.• ,.___. 1 ,1 . N. I' .. 1 . N Xit 141000040'' ....,n, _•./ •,.. II •-• I ood , II I II H_I II-1_ 1----- ei Mom. . 1 --I-- -j------ri-,._.. 1 loz_4____ CW16 Road 100 "ad:^11a.___"1 _ ,,,,,,sv R.,,co 1 _Melte.. . __-- •, ,,..\,.....1,.._ I &tee - tit if L2715.._ 1 r f-,-,.,..'- L_md'i- c 1,4 -,., .....0 roton n.od _ ' `. ---LX% .,,. ....: k li .--7.3--,-. , I, 3 '', ''..e7.7.7 '. ' _,,..',.0%..s.. ,".....y .,.....s.e."-...N___...., , _.,.--..c(t.,.). 's•-•.. . ..... .._.. ,...,.:..... ,...›......,„.:, •.. ;,.. , .• ••••• IT •• ...-i-- ••... i 1 -----'2 .:. r / I i y.,„ „, ,..... .__ g -=`.',,,:•_,., .., ..• c,k 1.-- - 4 - Legend SIGNAL SYSTEM I FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Eagle Traffic Controller New System JAcos g signals Naztec Traffic Controller 1 1 i R�erA.1,.., Pasadena �_1 —1------ —ti.�1 fS , J 1' '---- / 1 . Seabrook e ---�_ ` '- i Houston ^�'` ,— 5 I 1 ItiJ—'�;. + , ' * R. =r r ,r' ,� �`S —,. I ,'." I ..e \1\1 Pt' il 5; p•- I \'_. - t 3 Clear Lake Shores ; e 1. '� M —k } > 3 1 J .. fJ Nassau Bay 1, i 14{ ,y.,p y I " �� f' i 6 .a E. I Pearland r .: _ r) � �5 if.—• ... - a p � =�---, (fj a F-+•= y'y� P✓Ip{ - 1 t r ' N. 1 �`I, )'.�j ',r' - ' ` 4x' ,0 4�.. 40 it .a. r i - i • , — \ , ` (i r r dt�11,r i S f � f _J�ipl r�l I �' we t(emah 'eld �`'= d�a'yd° 44_ Webster �\ ,!, .�"` 1 aQ%I. ''►, r'" 'tia +F� t rr err ;k �a1 00 4,1 c.r se` - �iill 1 �C y� i; -1r` a _ 41 �`S _e x_ S f ey `y4 ,�+�I •-.,,I�kC {.�I j �`''tip.di y` ! 8 2 r °R , f r krgi ....'., d'/ r'`w. .` ��•` , . & ', : C ; € g Vim. .5 4 ,... - _- fbr / f • .d ,: r ae +, F� t .. a L •,...- ",+* ';,+'-'. • 1. t.... .,. I J jam' 2. .- —'t r • ;A x ti J� * `;o F — � °;" 4 e — "Eri"- 5 +.:• 1 f •-:. 1� Ir. 4 .aY r :d`' ... =5' �,T 9 _. 1 Jf \-----:1 r 1 ,....%,/ .e.i.c.. ..,,,,,,,,q:.,.. 7 .„.„/„. ._.. %.,,,,,, ../\..,..,,,,I,. „,, k.. ....:). N..:,.. /N. t,fIP oyf — r y'_ _ _...,_, ...,____ ., '�� bra f /y'' •` `,~' �,}+'1ie�. 1 J L� k a' • \1�Y e+ `". .a 4 J 1 'tr I i1 '•'r ,tr � rien r �f . ' ti J }r iJ rya _.. s-�` ,� 4 oa:J �� fJ}J rrf fir `f fiti i k 1 -_- — F a a ",J ti, _ }r , O • , .,� f f g r 1 N. \ `'•, ti.ti '•,, h rJJ -4"JJ ; «`'�'''a$ i••.e - €c L t• �3'.,J,` ••� '.k '`..r, 'y - rJ'' <'i....,-.,- ' , • -.... ,,.. i._______ k .,,, -11 ..".‘ ...... ":,./..t.. .\\,..,..„.."0'.........,....,, Li-- 1 ._..,-,t, .) 4,,,,,,, • i .1‘;,,,si•CV'\ \\‘),,,- ii,... , . f J ;; . ,$f� ma .. i � 4 ;L.,'' t ., 111141;;Q —.—r---is «.y41, ri •.� f1.--1-..,._.... < - y rs�•.4 .0' ".�`S a.r.n w-- E1-3 y. '}< tax .,`' ,}�` fr ». I _~,5 Zt. v t $I j y,_ r yT,., �+ r= 4, p .r :r �n _ ti_ r `�a Jr __ it V i �", f �_" `,.: •.•a "T=s Q ,.. ~'League City ' 7( I �t k �J ' 5y ..-5,.> ' =i , ..., ‘,... i L .-. ->... ., trw' ita J �`�`'.6 f atfr f ` �j f p fi 4.,, 4. 1,-"d'+' ' o..... ..u.. - :,•' ��11 Y. v-n 'i''IOW {I~'S l ��, .. , 'S°'� fr f. 1 s ;S�0)„,�A'hy`. - ;"... *.r.". }sP F -''"' ',5 _ ar' s $ "�1J =., g4?.f, k 1 l �°$ �t . F i ..+ E `rr f t f 5 -» xr 1. 1 f . 3 g -j}:y(�{ <:, ri r; i ,.�� _, -`" S\'\ +." k .. ...1 ram,,•.. 1 ... -5.$„,_ 1!., r ,,,,,41 „ .,, , 11.7 -i+s rr �r r: - {» a - 'td r. if .ma.. ,�.a�i'T f# `.�` °��,> '. M .'f 'S•. E Yam, e �>.+�'-Till � t `''�. am' .� _ ,..� 4 „�� :‘,:,:::: .--\1 :-1:::::.."r"' 4.4" tklz... 1.44,. Az.,.. ,,,,-">::: :. -s,?... .,1-7.,1:,, • ,..1".,A1 1. 5 illI I f �, z t I .....3., I.t. --e-6 Tfi 4, FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend SIGNAL SYSTEM KmN, 0 cJUwNvw +�, JACOBS — Eagle Traffic Controller — New System Ems/^, andksceHCWes Inc IN Signals — Naztec Traffic Controller tr,VC Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS Management Plan AppEndix D MEdium-TErm BicyclE / PEdEstrian ImprovEmEnts Appendix D Medium-TErm BicyclE/PEdEstrian ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan CInn and Aasopates,Inc. G-\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc tlaC Houston-GalvEston ArEa Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor ACCESS ManagEmEnt Plan AppEndix D MEdium-TErm BicgclE/PEdestrian ImprovEmEnts Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan D-2 . :,..„, _.4,f ,::.1 :.....\, 4"" 1111113 . '''' #...,'\ s\\., ----\; .,, ,w..= :as Uazolagow ,..._______ \ -, tp. ill _1 -t ` 3 ' fit � � a ti,� , � 1 igaIMMFM - ---- �. ma- ,--r--7 --;# 1-4., / i t''. ' "......iirm'-ilhliPiri., III6N• ,;.- / \,,,,,t, / - \ .pi,!_mr _ '` - - rt __ _ IL� -�j __., lialle --... ..„..--__,,--.--r.-- -7:c".,.:il •,..,".".-"""`i r.......-,, /........ !I . ' r r �js Cr •� i (1014, to Are,i esr West pt _ F • Brookside Village aA� ra«uwat. 4 ,� ti f II _ r.. r, 5 Max KO East E.. .'�k if `f iii� '. gQ P"°y.,v ' r.t-. -} f ti{,,,,r, S a ° irayior'la De r n 4 l iBroaa? ti l ! t f/ ��^^�� rL y _JV f,¢ 4/4,se , . , lca - aT'i .� ,.,-_ "' - I�! it '.... .. .. .._k• ..., T 4` ..w.. ,l� OeN Cana Filch 3f I ... . - ' r CIFtt I i - 'a' iF ' , EdtratUer 9oDCK Ceter rlm t' t f- r �� CJ f•UrM Fg. � f likv .triiriki,,,,. Teareepottatette i :; s i lay - -! ( ` xfcis le .. > *g i r•`-Celia*Mareteztts ° „.,,,... . , 4,ii., "--------lek \\ \ ly.7, m r. `mat .✓x`• 1 rp WidiF.. ^ �. i rs`, -1 �,�+'` , IA .. - i I ° ,-F - ..'Vk - ye ,:i J • .-14,AaainanFllen .s �, ' - gr� j-1 - ;r, Wen J � '.� -irri Sr�pP•h1o9r '� i ;.' Z , i i -L €" ,, ti a e Y" �.y` .,, -e, Clear Lake Shares-tom , , 4 L. , i _ l ;s (is'i 1' �1 -.a Reariand `51. ali �� rw.y� y NAnll "'r I;I \ i? o' ,.w'r .. 1 . r . i 11 WI As Ier- !: ._ ''s' l8!"d1 L_'., a{�r� ,z ,4 1 I n�Y c• S ;3' 14�_1 •+ Kemah � ? gpro _ h, ; �.Y `�� >, 4W *� -� kinertat# .wFiydnPoer K£135iCf °1f4�w - ram. « ` l ' I,s ' ;. �..g{Mref}+Afif - h<. - 0, t r c. rS 51„ �s . . , I �FlL -_,�� r.. f�� KNY S, ry q�p tar n>_ytute l .r^�1 -` �t �o� } w mJFol, ygny `\ . A> Crl \':‘:,,, ,.....,,,•-., _.....-7,7",.."' •,...' ! 2 II iE ' '�-� _ '? _ f ~.•,k °S • ate . t i t i3 I a Fan -el _ t• 91440131 y'}' 'v "fJ1 �; r' d q� r. 9. ^ ! 11 qa V "`' iN\ ,-t+�B? i0� G s*, v' 2� 1�1'�/, .W a'�7 Bmrc. _ _ y ,s r F tiaaw•1m y ,, , ,.. ., ! i 6ahLe( 1I *e Mat ' c`'�t r ti I ________ . _,T, , I. , ,„. ,..., , _ . Or t �1� u �� *.....,..___Ilti. r 7 og.W 1.� F,F.IF TWOOd , '---.i ♦,1FI/e"� i — a.:u 'Y"FVV _ • /1 \ Doi Be� $ 1 �' i -`•- � p C le _ " = r, f !M 64$ f fl .g pr :,�,+a fora n+.� _ 8 _ n� 1" -_f d� ._G ti T'au'ry Ruth 5'y7 I mi ,3 t. - trio_-, r tYnne ... �ki _ ;kJ�,yg a Lr M ` irk u g t2dF laFery y T d" Ry ",,a ; fix- _ .._ _ '� f_. (' 47:, a 4 s r d ri 3., C:Bsu sLCaIJ£cny ? A H6 rip, i Cit:::M1:44..---. /11('‘ 1 I i: i a , 4}mac e P s II mayor Lay ' 1s 7G feast Ahmrel r -y �� 4!"..1.7.7%. : , r�,y—� � �' r �• I11 tic*fivet G ,, LL 1 4' i - «-- t i "` tt, r r+�6oere ta,r. N rVii! f �}'r , .,+T;: ^- fy t - -_- .�Fi 4 j $11aY' '-.",� _1�,- `'/ sr' P✓ ' •__r i.. I Ft F.,r ,;-1 ? t�- c' i Y 0. f' j: 4.. _ �.} ``+ ""r6 ^C'� r�'p $ t Ig d8p�d ' Otter HA r'Js �' ? �1 -7. t7^�.-, 'a,e:15 t' t t' `'`3 ee: , NT - Eana•+a'Y !. NI... �' 7' q. {kh ' _..�.r�, '�`'c' , J T 5. 71ti y r • v�€T Q r F;e F Dickinson 0,,as t ` ` , ,...-,....,.....:-.., ........ ,....,.. C ( . r- .S, x• t vra a'.O b ny Q��,�,��y - s r Al Ta � � II M 3n f X i.- I +°' �i�. '" '-`. �{ u� '- A1I5tk ay' Aa' Q '�I _ tf + Le ^moo !4 •d��p�-.7f t ,� $ y} t tea► __ a - : s th c rA 0 1 F - -�t r . .g ...• ��_ 1 astlit�"5.` y7 tilrt�' a - s 1+ 1 d -•1 F 5 fn ,r.�c//.a;kwl Rr�6?__ .� 'in ,. !t 1v M 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend icycle Pedestrian Improvements Schools I fl o Bicycle Pedestian Recomendations f 4-1Plinf-s‘' School Buffer 0.25 0 50 Planned Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements - t 0 GUNUA Walking Distance iCar•wary KirrifirMon „ , s oe g -0.50-0 75 fm518 1 9 ,253 Department and Assx ales.IF ,. %„,,o' angxratioa tlaC Houston-GalvEston Area Council (H-GAC) FM 518 Corridor AccEss ManagEmEnt Plan AppEndix E Long-TErm ThoroughfarE Plans AppEndix E Long-TErm ThoroughfarE Plans Draft ACCESS Corridor Plan EonKimle♦y�-.H�o�rn n„Wlates.inc. E-1 G\TPTO\635917000\FM 518 Comdor Access Management Plan\Draft Report Copyright©2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc I I 1 L , •IP • — -.. ...--.........• .---------'-------- —' - r • — — .,........ • • Iirr- 40111 _.----- ill..".":7".'."1"... ..m.......1111. 1.6._______....-------- c \ .A...- _____.---- wall 1 ''''----'-':... .--- --------- _, _..-- ___--_t__ __L4 411111111111111. NIF <I.0 - - a it IMPINI."---- 1 - . 1 - \ ..v5.°L c. '''' ' s. 4,034.1' ‘-• 1111 . .. I -1 C F L-71- h 4_,...- I ..... , ..._ , ,, .00,6 !fn._ !MAI' ' Brooks!. Villa. -.111 '14" Brooks. ; 1 1 E drIll 111 G.d. Ali,112..14 11114 141 . dIIIIIII Or• 1 Cr.=_____ritaterY — T • ,•,.„,.,c.• , . \ \ ,......--.........____-- . I 2 -:•,-- ' I'. • at '‘Ilik4 '"'4 2, i . EM r kf,.,--o''' ,•-.- . ,..I''__ZI -la , i li seam I rt----Bui k IT if ..... ,../.- . '1'... 'NI I ax •,. .--- ''t '- --,.-•-. tl_.-- '3S-' I - - I 111 Shrta• z X•r,',.,. I •, I - • - - a x -"M"% _ 2 - II ;., '-- DIAB . 13.2.a I 13 • ,,,,,aLi "-I- .,,,. /CM% 1. i I: r F 1 I unay Moab.. Or • 13=1 'I') 11C-1 P ritr a Pont .../ I II att,Ra 5a i _ 14 .1.1.11 i4 AI Art - Ex.15A1 4 .!Ce 4,4..1 !? ___ . [cryetrd ay__I- , .• y,y-. 1 _.- ft- -3 1 1 - 2: C.hr 1 La.alt 1 : j11_ 11111111 - . .001 mmil 11116+AL r. .,.......,.1 j-,7 4-- _,,,o,_ 1, ell,silleilfirli41111 Inrillikj ? . 1 ... ---1-4-2-k. L i r E .—•-• -, p- - , ..ik ill li It -- 1 i , r 1,1".•=1 .-.14. • num!. ....„..,.. +4,. r Ma ti r' .., . 4; t 1' a - ..- ,, / .2...:. t---'-,------' cf.,-1‘.../". '-'-'-1•0:4111::i111111111;1--, ./, ,...A' f 11H i A ip _ a t'itt-r,Iffli '! • . IL ...-IVIR. . ...........!..L.- ,..q i P. f - - 1 V',...,.t ' „....,...7..e- '• 4WD ' - - • VII :Anl• , 18 __ i. L - 1.,196t 'i rr- :___ 1 II--,It' ' ... '-----:- I ..3! lk,-/ ,,-` 411.1111"0", 'IP.A ' • . ' Illtii 11101 ' am li v , 11 • I .-.- - .,,, ___,,,,,..i __.„ 1_ .... _ . , Fiala tri 4 614 t INN= e S J.\ 1 .eie,,,,It, • ,_ ___ _ : ,e- ____ _ ..-._,/,‘ .4''s it„ . , . U '*_,r . I Lij ,4 I ' ' 1 - 1 3 II _,/,,y‘a. . `-..., ' _ : -i . •,.t, 5.. V fild;' 11 Rya,Af'5. '-'5„..-s• \ -",.. ,, d• 05 -- ____-_ . . W tll . -,.... "•• -..-1-----,-.1 i ad•,, SA Ow•,, L._— , /- • arland ...0,-, . \K/ ' ..,.. I 1 1 • --•---f • Mr.al•end tA 1_..,............ '44 \ - . • ri...T10-4 4 P.% I z •. VA Abr_714 ar„ ( iiik , 1-- , - ,,-.- 44-• at. /! 3 ,_ 5•31 c.'", M'a..4'*-7'-' ,.--_, , __ 1-? * * ---'''')..c.: Scuta Fa riM ,,,,,m2: rma Colon al eel Oltrj•3 Beaky \,,, •,,,, , '--- ,--' .....2........51---= -- --- .IIMII911111 i 10.5 ri e215-i-p, 03q ii/ • — creat •ntaieral \-5,-/14,/> / c° • 1 1, L'a-a I.yan ' i MEL. Terell VV10.••• • I 3prng C-rd0 0, Cb,,x."-445.04, 4- I II k' 2 to 1 L t . •(:•nyw Mead, Arnold Betty Si - 1 ------ 11111111011111101. . . aLlialiIIII, . "\\t ...,..- I r ••••... .,••-••••1 Natan i - ill , .•, *IN, \,C).., ef..`e). .""‘'*:•? \ ''' / -....-1 !' i Ili 33 - I I 1 s,du,.tern I 1. F1417111 • i _ - 3.' T ' , ,/ i-, r".... — — — - . I i , . ' - i e J , , / ,,,, I,- ...,„ 3 -- -\ / ... ..- IF- ..._..„,.. "" ---; hd'''''' -- \\\\ 44( .-. 3 1 #, _,.1 ifrt Fnen. .od arrow) • Once --..551, - , •r Aftr_ _ ...- .131.0 ‘2 ..... . I i , I t .62_21.,_ w /(.... --I 11 ii ••-lad ea5 a aster -s'll.,\r •tb. C\ /*So,.„. BIM, 1 W.t.tf ..... ,..---- Ortanty R<.A0 I% ----1 'AcAeava 0.0.,,,,y _ •sever ----' _____________rt.sr,__,__—r•9 HO ,f7\ - ilf - Iim.,...p jpill ...... .. -- , • Raa .. WK.. rj --_Mangey Ranch ____ i P\,I• ' ...I i F• -5 ---- ------ 's(V. 1 ..,,..., / ao MS-TF-1 IP __• ____ a ' 111, ' ** ._ Cmot i I , e e / / -•••••!rty,., I Legend LONG TERM RECOMMENDATIONS I FM 51 8 CORRIDOR ACCESS PUN m pp-mri KrierHan 0,912a.9„ dq° JACOBS ommm . H-GAC 2022 Planned Improvements 4=1106 KHA Thoroughfare Recomendations N.NNE 1 and Associates Inc a Signals I Pearland Thoroughfare Plan �� /yes _- --- G Pasadena --�, ,ter a,4h,.q i' .,\ +! ! r, . r - C Seabrook .l :4, 04, .,; ,,.1 ) Houston r,� s.,. ::. / ,e4.. ., e e-f.-)k" :: / ---,\ , ff \ .<2 N.,11--\\ '\'' 'X'''''. " ... . ir=Sk . It'' { Qom/ i / , e X ..1‘,_,., 1,__//,,,\ V. A / r 1'l fir' it c,, a' �� J \� 4 ' " e/ ,/<-', 1 77114.( "*.e..' ''s 1 __ rer 4ter ,•--).\`/1/2, i.,..,>::,x..\, , ,____-< je': / '>,, ''.\k . -•• ''- 414A0A, .. - - \L, ---2,,,<eL A -c /-_• 410'.• \.N., 11 _ . \ • i ig' r_ otir.---- '- ' N't•-• # •V" e ;)7' -...,:' ,4+ 4& -, Ilk.". r.,<''' -' ''.1'. / .:',1\-:\\''''''' ''' , S /:.4-1.'i, ''\.- '''',, 1#44 .-',:l • t" . le '*°;P‘.‘ ' A \N--- --- \ ‘I. i"r --"S---* AN. 4' 11'. . A. .,, 4, ' Li .,. 1 \\.# i '.i ""'-4ikl-L Will. '.,''111, flO -/ '' --' 0,;14. '•yam A',l� it \`ji �t �,Y 1�'N.,v1r4r/iirr.iiti, 1,,,:.,- . , ! • .„---4,le. .. t ‘ * Vt 41,.*; , i ','),,,,, _ _ -,. ....) 1p, . A , N:\ ' It•• „,,,,,,4 ...... .„,„.... .,, , .., , 1 ., . . ,.. . ,. .. ...,...,, . . , „. , „..., --.1 '''• . Z ., / , ''•41WrI , /At ''''''' \ LAPotts**$"4-'zi...4"4•••••44 14.1k,4 4,‘'.'- , -vfn• • ..- . ..444111100. .,./,/ tder4 41". N ' , .. 410.4.sik 7 'It '‘,14, •'• 1 / , .. - -• . . ..-,- 4 :le; - . A' I A ''""\ ...,.,• A �i f, ,../, \.41:..4.,,,.4.t,,,..„ t t. �4AF,jf r�J \ '.y F r\{_._ ,,,,--Th , It. \ , .4"11146 -:‘,./7 t*o„ ,,,,‘, \ ' .....-.---- %lit—wilts.-1 -, - . _.,,,____, I ‘.7 , 40 / /. 1 I rif 1.'"j"ir# 7 .mei 1 ...E. : ,,. ' is �; f•t'IF+p�«t°' __ *si4'...,, / X .- a . , , • .1.2 ... .. 4, -. t.,,,„,,„-N 'F „, 'ill ..„ f ,,,,,,o;440. 3 � atria a. y��,�� - es. I. ,4*7 1 .ram ell. 41+4,4 :411111111°011w1421;5:Mm-..,-r---1-.4 . ., , . _ 10,48+; , . ri-7. 1ffir I . ..1__ i K..1;:- 72:674,424:11h,16$14:49'111'. .-4010.44:' ..,, ai-st' . . . , .. a.__ _ , iv wog_ g , . l'i tilliM , -11 Ilg itfr*Irdt, . / :---. A.... ...4.4#1"4- e ..k..i /1"6141.11.--` etj-:... , ii\''''' 1 '..,„ 4,14,..1P , , Vls..-"Ei.'1.0ir \ , __ . :','. ..,; 1_\,. 1/4, ‘4,'"4_,4,1' e'\1 ii! q -' ' -t,—, // f' 1 _., FM 518 CORRIDOR ACCESS PLAN Legend LONG TERM RECOMMENDATIONS _ r+. .-. a JACOBS H-GAC 2f322 Planned Improvements KHA Thoroughfare Reoomendations I Cam( \ ri'�d4s IK S`,i tiiy 1 Signals Pearland Thoroughfare Plan