The URL can be used to link to this page

R-2016-176 2016-10-10RESOLUTION NO. R2016-176 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pearland, Texas, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into a contract with Klotz Associates, Inc., in the amount of $477,084.41, for professional services associated with the Green Tee Terrace Trail Project (Hughes Road to FM 518 Phase 1 of a TIP funded project). BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS: Section 1. That certain contract by and between the City of Pearland and Klotz Associates, Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof for all purposes, is hereby authorized and approved. Section 2. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute and the City Secretary to attest a contract with Klotz Associates, Inc., for the professional services associated with the Green Tee Terrace Trail Project. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this the 10`" day of October, A.D., 2016. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DARRII4 . COKER CITY ATTORNEY TOM REID MAYOR ,''/111411111 tON```` Resolution No. R2016-176 Exhibit "A" CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS §§ §§ THIS CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES is made by and between City of Pearland, 3519 Liberty Drive, Pearland, Texas 77581, hereinafter called "City," and RPS Klotz Associates, Inc., 1160 Diary Ashford, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77079, hereinafter called "Engineer." for the purpose of contracting for engineering services. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, "Professional Services Procurement Act," provides for the procurement of engineering services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to contract for engineering services generally described as Green Tee Terrace Hike and Bike Trail along Clear Creek from the southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch to Broadtiay Street (FM 518); and, WHEREAS, the City has selected the Engineer to provide the needed services and the Engineer has agreed to provide the services subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the City and the Engineer do hereby mutually agree as follows. ARTICLE 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City and the Engineer will furnish items and perform those services for fulfillment of the contract as identified in Attachment B, Services to be Provided by the City and Attachment C, Services to be Provided by the Engineer. All services provided by the Engineer will conform to standard engineering practices and applicable rules and regulations of the Texas Engineering Practices Act and the rules of the Texas Board of Professional Engineers. ARTICLE 2. CONTRACT PERIOD. This contract becomes effective when fully executed by all parties, and it will terminate on completion of all obligations by all parties. Any work performed or cost incurred before or after the contract period will be ineligible for reimbursement. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION. A. Maximum Amount Payable. The maximum amount payable under this contract without modification is shown in Attachment E, Anticipated Maximum Fee. All paymcnts are contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds. B. Notice to Proceed. The Engineer may not begin work under this contract until authorized 1 in writing by the City to proceed as provided in Attachment A, General Provision, Article 2, Notice to Proceed. C. Basis of Payment. The basis of payment for Engineering Services performed under this contract shall be LUMP SUM, EXCLUDING those services specifically identified on Attachment E, Method of Payment, Page One (1) as requiring prior authorization by the City and as further enumerated here: Construction Phase Services, Materials Testing, ROW Acquisitions, Cultural Resources, Relocation Assistance and Condemnation Support. The basis of payment for these specific services shall be "hourly, not to exceed", or "unit cost" as described. D. Reimbursement of Eligible Costs. To be eligible for reimbursement, the Engineer's costs must (1) be incurred in accordance with the terms of Attachment C, Services to Be Provided by Engineer; (2) be in accordance with Attachment E, Anticipated Maximum Fee; and (3) comply with cost principles set forth at 48 CFR Part 31, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31). Satisfactory progress of work will be maintained as a condition of payment. E. Engineer Payment of Subproviders. No later than 10 days after receiving payment from the City, the Engineer will pay all subproviders for work performed under a subcontract authorized by this contract. The City may withhold all payments that have or may become due if the Engineer fails to comply with the ten-day payment requirement. The City may also suspend the work under this contract until subproviders are paid. This requirement also applies to all lower tier subproviders, and this provision must be incorporated into all subcontracts. ARTICLE 4. PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS A. Monthly Billing Statements. The Engineer may request reimbursement of costs incurred by submitting the original and one copy of an itemized billing statement in a form acceptable to the City. The Engineer is authorized to submit requests for reimbursement no more frequently than monthly and no later than 90 days after costs are incurred. B. Billing Statement. The billing statement will show the total amount earned to the date of submission, and the amount due and payable as of the date of the current billing statement. The Engineer's billing statement will indicate if the work has been completed or if the billing is for partial completion of the work at the cost set forth in Attachment E, Anticipated Maximum Fee. For cost plus fixed fee contracts, any portion of the fixed fee not previously paid will be included in the final payment unless the contract is terminated before the work is completed. In that case, the fixed fee will be paid in proportion to the percentage of work completed. C. Overhead Rates. The Engineer will use the provisional overhead rate indicated in Attachment E, Anticipated Maximum Fee. If a periodic escalation of the provisional overhead rate is specified in Attachment E, the effective date of the revised provisional overhead rate must be included. For lump sum contracts, the overhead rate remains unchanged for the entire contract period. D. Thirty Day Payments. Upon receipt of a billing statement that complies with all requirements set forth in this Article, the City will make a good faith effort to pay the amount that is due and payable within thirty days. 2 E. Withholding Payments. The City reserves the right to withhold payment of the Engineer's billing statement in the event of any of the following: (1) if a dispute over the work or cost of the work is not resolved within the 30 day period; (2) pending verification of satisfactory work performed; (3) the Engineer becomes a delinquent obligor as set forth in Section 231.006 of the Family Code; (4) required reports are not received; or (5) the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts will not issue a warrant to the Engineer. In any event that payment is withheld, the City will notify the Engineer and give a remedy that would allow the City to release the payment. F. Required Reports. The Engineer will submit a separate report with each billing statement showing the percent of the work accomplished during the billing period and the percent completion to date, and any additional written report requested by the City to document the progress of the work. In addition, the Engineer will provide all required forms that the City will be required to submit to the Texas Department of Transportation for reimbursement. G. Debt to the City. If the State Comptroller of Public Accounts is prohibited from issuing a warrant to the Engineer because of a debt owed to the City, the City will apply all payment due the Engineer to the debt or delinquent tax until the debt or delinquent tax is paid in full. ARTICLE 5. SIGNATORY WARRANTY. The undersigned signatory for the Engineer hereby represents and warrants that he or she is an officer of the organization for which he or she has executed this contract and that he or she has full and complete authority to enter into this contract on behalf of the firm. The above -stated representations and warranties are made for the purpose of inducing the City to enter into this contract. ARTICLE 6. NOTICES. All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement will be delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed to such party at the following addresses: City: Engineer: City of Pearland 3519 Liberty Drive Pcarland, Texas 77581 RPS Klotz Associates, Inc., 1160 Dairy Ashford, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77079 Attn: Brad Brown, P.E. All notices will be deemed given on the date the notice is delivered or deposited in the mail, unless otherwise provided under this contract. A party to this contract may change the above address by sending written notice of the change to the other party. Either party may require that all notices be delivered personally or by certified U.S. mail by sending written notice of the requirement to the other party. ARTICLE 7. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS. Attachments A through (; are attached to and incorporated into this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Engineer and the City have executed these presents in duplicate counterparts. THE ENGINEER: Signature Authori Representative of the Firm Date CITY OF PEARLAND, TEXAS Executed or the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, estabii c o 'cork programs approved and authorized by the City. Clay Pear on, City Manager /Os IS. /� Date ATTEST: You TRMC�ty &cretary 4 Contract Number XXX Attachments to Contract for Engineering Services Attached and Incorporated into the Contract by Reference Attachment Name of Attachment A General Provisions Services to be Provided by the Ci_and State Services to be Provided by the Engineer D Anticipated Schedule E Antics ' ated Maximum Fee F Insurance for Designated Professional Service Contract G Document and Information Exchange H Overview Map Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT A Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT A GENERAL PROVISIONS INDEX TO PROVISIONS Article 1 Title 1 1 Work Schedule 2 Notice to Proceed 3 Progress 4 1 Sup,pnsion of Work 5 1 Additional Work 6 Chanes in Work 7 I Supplemental Agreements 8 1 Ownershj� of Data 9 Public Information 10 Personnel, E9uipment and Material 11 Not ARRlicable 12 Subcontracting 13 In$peition of Work 14 Submission of Reports 15 Violation of Contract Terms 16 Termination 17 Compliance with Laws 18 Indemnification 19 Engineer's Responsibility 20 Noncollusion 21 i Insurance 22 1 Gratuities 23 DBE/HUB Revirements 24 Maintenance, Retention and Audit of Records 25 Not Applicable 26 Civil Rights Compliance 27 Patent Ric is 28 ComputerGra hic Files 29 Child Support Statement 30 Disputes 31 Successors and Assigns 32 Severability 33 Prior Contracts Superseded 34 Conflict of Interest ATTACHMENT A GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 1. WORK SCHEDULE A. Work Schedule. The Engineer shall develop a work schedule, attached hereto and labeled Attachment D, Work Schedule, showing how the scope of services under this contract shall be accomplished within the contract period and at the agreed upon cost. B. Changes to Work Schedule. If at any time during the contract period the Engineer determines that the authorized services cannot be completed before the end ()idle contract period as specified in Article 2 of the contract (Contract Period), the Engineer shall immediately notify the City. The City will evaluate the request, and at its sole discretion may extend the contract period by written supplemental agreement as provided in General Provisions, Article 7, Supplemental Agreements. If the City determines that the contract period will not be extended, the Engineer rnust complete the work within the original contract period. ARTICLE 2. NOTICE TO PROCEED A. Written Notice. The City shall issue a written notice to the Engineer authorizing work to begin. The Engineer shall not proceed with any work authorized in this contract until such notice is received. B. No Costs Incurred. The Engineer shall not undertake work or incur costs under this contract until the written notice to proceed is issued. Any costs incurred by the Engineer prior to receipt of such notice are not eligible for reimbursement under this contract. ARTICLE 3. PROGRESS A. Progress meetings. The Engineer shall from time to time during the progress of the work confer with the City. The Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary or as may be requested by the City in order to evaluate features of the work. B. Conferences. At the request of the City or the Engineer, conferences shall be provided at the Engineer's office, the office of the City, or at other locations designated by the City. These conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineer's services and work when requested by the City. C. Inspections. If federal funds are used to reimburse costs incurred under this contract, the work and all reimbursements will be subject to periodic review by the U. S. Department of Transportation. D. Reports. The Engineer shall promptly advise the City in writing of events that have a significant impact upon the progress of the work, including: 1. problems, delays, adverse conditions that will materially affect the ability to meet the time schedules and goals, or preclude the attainment of project work units by 7 established time periods; this disclosure will be accompanied by statement of the action taken or contemplated, and any State or federal assistance needed to resolve the situation; and 2. favorable developtnents or events that enable meeting the work schedule goals sooner than anticipated. E. Corrective Action. Should the City determine that the progress of work does not satisfy the milestone schedule set forth in Attachment D, Work Schedule, the City shall review the work schedule with the Engineer to determine the nature of corrective action needed. ARTICLE 4. SUSPENSION OF WORK A. Notice. Should the City desire to suspend the work but not terminate the contract, the City may verbally notify the Engineer followed by written confirmation, giving thirty (30) days notice. Both parties may waive the thirty -day notice in writing. B. Reinstatement. The work may be reinstated and resumed in full force and effect within sixty (60) business days of receipt of written notice from the City to resume the work. Both parties may waive the sixty-day notice in writing. C. Contract Period Not Affected. If the City suspends the work, the contract period as determined in Article 2 of the contract (Contract Period) is not affected, and the contract will terminate on the date specified unless the contract is amended to authorize additional time. D. Limitation of Liability. The City assumes no liability for work performed or costs incurred prior to the date authorized by the City to begin work, during periods when work is suspended, or after the completion date of the contract. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL WORK A. Notice. If the Engineer is of the opinion that any assigned work is beyond the scope of this contract and constitutes additional work, it shall promptly notify the City in writing, presenting the facts and showing how the work constitutes additional work. B. Supplemental Agreement. If the City finds that the work does constitute additional work, the City shall so advise the Engineer and a written supplemental agreement will be executed as provided in Article 7, Supplemental Agreements, of these General Provisions. if performance of the additional work will cause the maximum amount payable under the contract to be exceeded, the Engineer shall not perform any proposed additional work or incur any additional costs prior to the execution of a supplemental agreement. C. Limitation of Liability. The City shall not be responsible for actions by the Engineer or any costs incurred by the Engineer relating to additional work not directly associated with or prior to the execution of a supplemental agreement. ARTICLE 6. CHANGES 1N WORK A. Work Previously Submitted as Satisfactory. If the Engineer has submitted work in accordance with the terms of this contract but the City requests changes to the completed work or 8 parts thereof which involve changes to the original scope of services or character of work under the contract, the Engineer shall make such revisions as requested and as directed by the City. This will be considered as additional work and paid for as specified under Article 5, Additional Work. B. Work Does Not Comply with Contract. If the Engineer submits work that does not comply with the terms of this contract, the City shall instruct the Engineer to make such revisions as are necessary to bring the work into compliance with the contract. No additional compensation shall be paid for this work. C. Errors/Omissions. The Engineer shall make revisions to the work authorized in this contract, which are necessary to correct errors or omissions appearing therein, when required to do so by the City. No additional compensation shall be paid for this work. ARTICLE 7. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS A. Need. The terms of this contract may be modified if the City determines that there has been an increase or decrease in the duration, scope, or character of the services to be performed. A supplemental agreement will be executed to authorize such increases or decreases. B. Compensation. Additional compensation, if appropriate, shall be calculated as set forth in Article 3 of the contract (Compensation). The parties may reevaluate and renegotiate costs at this time. C. When to Execute. Both parties must execute a supplemental agreement within the contract period specified in Article 2 of the contract (Contract Period). ARTICLE 8. CITY OWNERSHIP OF DATA A. Work for Hire. All services provided under this contract are considered work for hire and as such ail data, basic sketches, charts, calculations, plans, specifications, and other documents created or collected under the terms of this contract are the property of the City. B. Disposition of Documents. All documents prepared by the Engineer and all documents furnished to the Engineer by the City shall be delivered to the City upon request by the City. The Engineer, at its own expense, may retain copies of such documents or any other data which it has furnished the City under this contract, but further use of the data is subject to permission by the City. C. Release of Design Plan. The Engineer (1) will not release any roadway design plan created or collected under this contract except to its subproviders as necessary to complete the contract; (2) shall include a provision in all subcontracts which acknowledges the City's ownership of the design plan and prohibits its use for any use other than the project identified in this contract; and (3) is responsible for any improper use of the design plan by its employees, officers, or subproviders, including costs, damages, or other liability resulting from improper use. Neither the Engineer nor any subprovider may charge a fee for the portion of the design plan created by the City. 9 ARTICLE 9. PUBLIC INFORMATION The City will comply with Government Code, Chapter 552, the Public Information Act, and 43 Texas Administrative Code §3.10 et seq. in the release of information produced under this contract. ARTICLE 10. PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL A. Engineer Resources. The Engineer shall furnish and maintain quarters for the performance of all services, in addition to providing adequate and sufficient personnel and equipment to perform the services required under the contract. The Engineer certifies that it presently has adequate qualified personnel in its employment for performance of the services required under this contract, or it will be able to obtain such personnel from sources other than the City. B. Removal of Contractor Employee. All employees of the Engineer assigned to this contract shall have such knowledge and experience as will enable them to perform the duties assigned to them. The City may instruct the Engineer to remove any employee from association with work authorized in this contract if, in the sole opinion of the City, the work of that employee does not comply with the terms of this contract or if the conduct of that employee becomes detrimental to the work. C. Replacement of Key Personnel. The Engineer must notify the City in writing as soon as possible, but no later than three business days after a project manager or other key personnel is removed from association with this contract, giving the reason for removal. D. City Approval of Replacement Personnel. The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the City. The City must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the City determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the City within forty-five (45) days. ARTICLE 11. NOT APPLICABLE ARTICLE 12. SUBCONTRACTING A. Prior Approval. The Engineer shall not assign, subcontract, or transfer any portion of professional services related to the work under this contract without prior written approval from the City. B. HUB Compliance. The Engineer's subcontracting program shall comply with the Disadvantaged/Minority Business Enterprise Program requirements established in 49 CFR Part 26. The Engineer shall make good faith efforts to award subcontracts or supply agreements in at least 20 percent of the value of this contract to Historically Underutilized Businesses. The Engineer shall apprise themselves of the requirements for good faith efforts as found in the aforementioned code, and will comply with them. C. Required Provisions. All subcontracts for professional services shall include the provisions 10 included in Attachment A, General Provisions, and any provisions required by law. The Engineer is authorized to pay subproviders in accordance with the terms of the subcontract, and the basis of payment may differ from the basis of payment by the City to the Engineer. D. Prior Review. Subcontracts for professional services in excess of $25,000 shall be reviewed by the City prior to performance of work thereunder. E. Engineer Responsibilities. No subcontract relieves the Engineer of any responsibilities under this contract. ARTICLE 13. INSPECTION OF WORK A. Review Rights. The City and the U. S. Department of Transportation, when federal funds are involved, and any of their authorized representatives shall have the right at all reasonable times to review or otherwise evaluate the work performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed. B. Reasonable Access. If any review or evaluation is made on the premises of the Engineer or a subprovider, the Engineer shall provide and require its subproviders to provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of the City or federal representatives in the performance of their duties. ARTICLE 14. SUBMISSION OF REPORTS All applicable study reports shall be submitted in preliminary form for approval by the City before a final report is issued. The City's comments on the Engineer's preliminary report must be addressed in the final report. ARTICLE 15. VIOLATION OF CONTRACT TERMS A. Increased Costs. Violation of contract terms, breach of contract, or default by the Engineer shall be grounds for termination of the contract, and any increased or additional cost incurred by the City arising from the Engineer's default, breach of contract or violation of contract terms shall be paid by the Engineer. B. Remedies. This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party and shall be cumulative. ARTICLE 16. TERMINATION A. Causes. The contract may be terminated before the stated completion date by any of the following conditions. (1) By mutual agreement and consent, in writing from both parties. (2) By the City by notice in writing to the Engineer as a consequence of failure by the Engineer to perform the services set forth herein in a satisfactory manner. (3) By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill its obligations as set forth herein. (4) By the City for reasons of its own, not subject to the mutual consent of the Engineer, by giving thirty business days notice of termination in writing to the Engineer. (5) By the City, if the Engineer violates the provisions of Attachment A, General 11 Provisions Article 22, Gratuities, or Attachment H, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise/Historically Undenrtilized Business Requirements. (6) By satisfactory completion of all services and obligations described herein. B. Measurement. Should the City terminate this contract as herein provided, no fees other than fees due and payable at the time of termination shall thereafter be paid to the Engineer. In determining the value of the work performed by the Engineer prior to termination, the City shall be the sole judge. Compensation for work at termination will be based on a percentage of the work completed at that time. Should the City terminate this contract under paragraph (4) or (5) above, the Engineer shall not incur costs during the thirty -day notice period in excess of the amount incurred during the preceding thirty days. C. Value of Completed Work. If the Engineer defaults in the performance of this contract or if the City terminates this contract for fault on the part of the Engineer, the City will give consideration to the following when calculating the value of the completed work: (1) the actual costs incurred (not to exceed the rates set forth in Attachment E, Fee Schedule) by the Engineer in perforniing the work to the date of default; (2) the amount of work required which was satisfactorily completed to date of default; (3) the value of the work which is usable to the City; (4) the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the required work; (5) the time required to employ another firm to complete the work; and (6) other factors which affect the value to the City of the work performed. D. Calculation of Payments. The State shall use the fee schedule set forth in Attachment E to the contract (Fee Schedule) in determining the value of the work performed up to the time of termination. In the case of partially completed engineering services, eligible costs will be calculated as set forth in Attachment E, Fee Schedule. The sum of' the provisional overhead percentage rate during the years in which work was perfornied shall be used to calculate partial payments. Any portion of the fixed fee not previously paid in the partial payments shall not be included in the final payment. E. Excusable Delays. Except with respect to defaults of subproviders, the Engineer shall not be in default by reason of any failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its terms (including any failure to progress in the performance of the work) if such failure arises out of causes beyond the control and without the default or negligence of the Engineer. Such causes may include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or the public enemy, acts of the Government in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, and unusually severe weather. F. Surviving Requirements. The termination of this contract and payment of an amount in settlement as prescribed above shall extinguish the rights, duties, and obligations of the City and the Engineer under this contract, except for those provisions that establish responsibilities that extend beyond the contract period. G. Payment of Additional Costs. If termination of this contract is due to the failure of the Engineer to fulfill its contract obligations, the City may take over the project and prosecute the work to completion, and the Engineer shall be liable to the City for any additional cost to the 12 City. ARTICLE 17. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Engineer shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any court, or administrative bodies or tribunals in any manner affecting the performance of this contract, including, ,vithout limitation, worker's compensation laws, minimum and maximum salary and wage statutes and regulations, nondiscrimination, and licensing laws and regulations. When required, the Engineer shall furnish the City with satisfactory proof of its compliance therewith. ARTICLE 18. INDEMNIFICATION A. Errors, Omissions, Negligent Acts. The Engineer shall save harmless the City and its officers and employees from all claims and liability due to activities of itself, its agents, or employees, performed under this contract and which are caused by or result from error, omission, or negligent act of the Engineer or of any person employed by the Engineer. B. Attorney Fees. The Engineer shall also save harmless the City from any and all expense, including, but not limited to, attorney fees which may be incurred by the City in litigation or otherwise resisting said claim or liabilities which may be imposed on the City as a result of such activities by the Engineer, its agents, or employees. ARTICLE 19. ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY A. Accuracy. The Engineer shall be responsible for the accuracy of work and shall promptly make necessary revisions or corrections resulting from its errors, omissions, or negligent acts without compensation. B. Errors and Omissions. The Engineer's responsibility for all questions arising from design errors and/or omissions will be determined by the City and all decisions shall be in accordance with the City's "Errors or Omissions Policy" in accordance with 43 Texas Administrative Code §9.38(f). The Engineer will not be relieved of the responsibility for subsequent correction of any such errors or omissions or for clarification of any ambiguities until after the construction phase of the project has been completed. C. Seal. The responsible Engineer shall sign, seal and date all appropriate engineering submissions to the City in accordance with the Texas Engineering Practice Act and the rules of the Texas Board of Professional Engineers. D. Resealing of Documents Once the work has been sealed and accepted by the City, the City, as the owner, will notify the party to this contract, in writing, of the possibility that a City engineer, as a second engineer, may find it necessary to alter, complete, correct, revise or add to the work. If necessary, the second engineer will affix his seal to any work altered, completed, corrected, revised or added. The second engineer will then become responsible for any alterations, additions or deletions to the original design including any effect or impacts of those changes on the original engineer's design. 13 ARTICLE 20. NONCOLLUSION A. Warrant -y. The Engineer warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Engineer, to solicit or secure this contract and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or engineer any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. B. Liability. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or compensation, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. ARTICLE 21. INSURANCE The Engineer certifies that it has insurance on file with the City in the amount specified in Attachment F. No other proof of insurance is acceptable to the City. The Engineer certifies that it will keep current insurance on file with that office for the duration of the contract period. If insurance lapses during the contract period, the Engineer must stop work until a new certificate of insurance is provided. ARTICLE 22. GRATUITIES A. Employees Not to Benefit. The City policy mandates that employees of the City shall not accept any benefit, gift or favor from any person doing business with or who reasonably speaking may do business with the City under this contract. The only exceptions allowed are ordinary business lunches and items that have received the advance written approval of the Mayor. B. Liability. Any person doing business with or who reasonably speaking may do business with the City under this contract may not make any offer of benefits, gifts or favors to department employees, except as mentioned above. Failure on the part of the Engineer to adhere to this policy may result in the termination of this contract. ARTICLE 23. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE OR HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS/MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE COMPLIANCE The parties shall comply with the Disadvantaged/Minority Business Enterprise Program requirements established in 49 CFR Part 26. The Engineer shall make good faith efforts to award subcontracts or supply agreements in at least 15 percent of the value of this contract to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The Engineer shall apprise themselves of the requirements for good faith efforts as found in the aforementioned code, and will comply with them. ARTICLE 24. MAINTENANCE, RETENTION AND AUDIT OF RECORDS A. Retention Period. The Engineer shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and services provided (hereinafter called the Records). The Engineer shall make the records available at its office during the contract period and for four years from the date of final payment under this contract, until completion of 14 all audits, or until pending litigation has been completely and fully resolved, whichever occurs last. B. Availability. The City or any of its duly authorized representatives, the Texas Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General, and the Comptroller General shall have access to the Engineer's Records which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions. C. Examination. The City shall require the Engineer to make the Records available for the purpose of checking the amount of work performed by the Engineer at the time of contract termination or for other reasons of its own, not subject to agreement by the Engineer. ARTICLE 25. NOT APPLICABLE ARTICLE 26. CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE (1) Compliance with Repulations: The Engineer shall comply with the regulations of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 21, 24, 26 and 60 as they relate to nondiscrimination; also Executive Order 11246 titled Equal Employment Opportunity as amended by Executive Order 11375. (2) Nondiscriminatirn: The Engineer, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. (3) Solicitations for Subcontracts. Including Procurement of Materials and Eoulnment: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Engineer for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Engineer of the Engineer's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin. (4) Information and Reports: The Engineer shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and facilities as may be determined by the City, the Texas Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations or directives. Where any information required of the Engineer is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the Engineer shall so certify to the City, the Texas Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. (5) Sanctions for Noncomnliince: In the event of the Engineer's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the City, the Texas Department of Transportation shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine 15 to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: (a) withholding of payments to the Engineer under the contract until the Engineer complies and/or (b) cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. (6) Incorporation of Provisions: The Engineer shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The Engineer shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the City, the Texas Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance provided, however, that in the event an Engineer becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Engineer may request the City to cntcr into such litigation to protect the interests of the City; and, in addition, the Engineer may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. ARTICLE 27. PATENT RIGHTS The City and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract. ARTICLE 28. COMPUTER GRAPHICS FILES The Engineer shall provide Computer Graphics Files as required by the State. ARTICLE 29. CHILD SUPPORT STATEMENT The Engineer certifies that it has a child support statement on file with the Contract Services Office of the Texas Department of Transportation. The Engineer is responsible for keeping the child support statement current and on file with that office for the duration of the contract period. The Engineer further certifies that the child support statement on file contains the child support information for the individuals or business entities named in this contract. Under Section 231.006, Family Code, the Engineer certifies that the individual or business entity named in this contract, bid, or application is not ineligible to receive the specified grant, loan, or payment and acknowledges that this contract may be terminated and payment may be withheld if this certification is inaccurate. ARTICLE 30. DISPUTES A. Disputes Not Related to Contract Services. The Engineer shall be responsible for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of any procurement made by the Engineer in support of the services authorized herein. B. Disputes Concerning Work or Cost. Any dispute concerning the work hereunder or additional costs, or any non -procurement issues shall be settled in accordance with 43 Texas Administrative Code §201.1. 16 ARTICLE 31. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The Engineer and the City do each hereby bind themselves, their successors, executors, administrators and assigns to each other party of this agreement and to the successors, executors, administrators and assigns of such other party in respect to all covenants of this contract. The Engineer shall not assign, subcontract or transfer its interest in this contract without the prior written consent of the City. ARTICLE 32. SEVERABILITY In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this contract shall for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and this contract shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. ARTICLE 33. PRIOR CONTRACTS SUPERSEDED This contract constitutes the sole agreement of the parties hereto for the services authorized herein and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral contracts between the parties respecting the subject matter defined herein. ARTICLE 34. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The undersigned represents that its firm has no conflict of interest that would in any way interfere with its or its employees' performance of services for the department or which in any way conflicts with the interests of the department. The firm shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the department's interests. 17 Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT B Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT B SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY/TxDOT Bike Trail: Green Tee Terrace Hike and Bike Trail Limits: Project is located from just east of Hughes Road to FM 518 with two short trail segments which are currently existing and will not be part of this contract. The work to be performed by the Engineer under this contract consists of providing professional engineering, environmental, surveying, and landscape services required for the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) and bidding documents for a ten (10) foot wide shared use path along Clear Creek and a tributary channel in the segments described below. The specific limits and the design of the trail are described below. (See Attachment H) Segment 1: Beginning just east of Hughes Road, the trail is existing along the east side of Clear Creek adjacent to the Riverstone Ranch Subdivision for approximately 1500 feet to the east. From this point the trail will continue for approximately 2500 feet along the east side of Clear Creek east to up to the proposed bridge location over Clear Creek. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment 2: From the east side Clear Creek, the proposed bridge (approximately 150 feet in span length) will cross Clear Creek from the east to the west side of the Creek. From the bridge, the proposed trial will follow along the west side of Clear Creek for 3400 feet to the tributary connection with Clear Creek. From this point, the trail crosses over from the east side to the west side of the tributary at an existing culvert (with a proposed culvert extension needed) and then to an existing trail section for approximately 400 feet south. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment 3: Beginning on the west side of the tributary at the existing trail, this trail goes south to the north side Providence Village Drive for a distance of 600 feet. This segment will include survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment 4: After crossing Providence Village Drive, the trail crosses a culvert bridge to the side of the tributary and turns south along the west side of the tributary to FM 518 then turns east along FM 518 over an existing culvert (with a proposed culvert extension needed) to tie into an existing sidewalk for 1300 feet. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Contract Number XXX Segment to Parking Lot: From Clear Creek at the bridge, the trail connects to the proposed parking lot for a distance of 600 feet. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. The total length of new trail is 8,350 (1.58 miles). The total length of all segments is approximately 10,450 feet (1.98 miles). CSJ: 0912-31-291 Contract No.: 13 - The City will furnish to the Engineer the following items: 1. Roadway design requirements. 2. Available horizontal control points. 3. Available benchmark elevations and descriptions for vertical control. 4. If available, the data on file concerning: a. Existing facilities construction documents and "as-builts". 5. Available interface data for any projects adjacent to, crossing, and/or within limits. 6. Available existing traffic counts and design year traffic projections necessary to develop the traffic control plans. 7. Right-of-way maps, if available. 8. Assistance will be provided to the Engineer to obtain the required data and information from other local, regional, State and federal agencies. 9. Timely review and decisions necessary for the Engineer to maintain the contracted project schedule. 10. Project technical and administrative standards and procedures. 11. Design criteria for roadway, structures, drainage, and hydraulics. 12.Traffic Accident Data necessary for any design exceptions or waivers. 13. Provide all necessary standard forms and conveyance instruments 14. Provide final approval for all appraisals 15. Cost of preliminary title commitment and title insurance for all parcels acquired Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT C SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER Bike Trail: Green Tee Terrace Hike and Bike Trail Limits: Project is located from just east of Hughes Road to FM 518 with two short trail segments which are currently existing and will not be part of this contract. The work to be performed by the Engineer under this contract consists of providing professional engineering, environmental, surveying, and landscape services required for the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) and bidding documents for a ten (10) foot wide shared use path along Clear Creek and a tributary channel in the segments described below. The specific limits and the design of the trail are described below. (See Attachment H) Segment 1: Beginning just east of Hughes Road, the trail is existing along the east side of Clear Creek adjacent to the Riverstone Ranch Subdivision for approximately 1500 feet to the east. From this point the trail will continue for approximately 2500 feet along the east side of Clear Creek east to up to the proposed bridge location over Clear Creek. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment 2: From the east side Clear Creek, the proposed bridge (approximately 150 feet in span length) will cross Clear Creek from the east to the west side of the Creek. From the bridge, the proposed trial will follow along the west side of Clear Creek for 3400 feet to the tributary connection with Clear Creek. From this point, the trail crosses over from the east side to the west side of the tributary at an existing culvert (with a proposed culvert extension needed) and then to an existing trail section for approximately 400 feet south. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment 3: Beginning on the west side of the tributary at the existing trail, this trail goes south to the north side Providence Village Drive for a distance of 600 feet. This segment will include survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment 4: After crossing Providence Village Drive. the trail crosses a culvert bridge to the side of the tributary and turns south along the west side of the tributary to FM 518 then turns east along FM 518 over an existing culvert (with a proposed culvert extension needed) to tie into an existing sidewalk for 1300 feet. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Segment to Parking Lot: From Clear Creek at the bridge. the trail connects to the proposed parking lot for a distance of 600 feet. This segment will include engineering, environmental, survey and landscaping amenities scope of work. Page 1 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX The total length of new trail is 8,350 (1.58 miles). The total length of all segments is approximately 10.450 feet (1.98 miles). The Engineer shall prepare plans, details and compute quantities to include bike trail design, grading, paving, sidewalks and pedestrian ramps, drainage, signing. pavement markings, traffic control plans, storm water pollution prevention plans, landscape architecture, retaining walls, specifications, and cost estimates. The Engineer shall also prepare a parking layout; the bridge layouts; and furnish the structural details along with the bridge quantities for no more than two bridge crossings. Engineer shall prepare a project manual to include appropriate front end documents and specifications for TxDOT and City of Pearland. The Engineer shall collect, review and evaluate the available existing data pertaining to the project and prepare the Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) in accordance with the requirements and policies of the TxDOT. The Engineer shall be responsible for identifying and delineating temporary construction easements in areas outside the City's Right of Way (ROW). The Engineer shall secure the necessary legal instruments. The Engineer shall identify, prepare exhibits and complete all necessary forms for Design Exceptions and Waivers or both, within project limits prior to the 30% Submittal. These exceptions shall be provided to the TxDOT for coordination and processing of approvals. If subsequent changes require additional exceptions. the Engineer shall notify the TxDOT as soon as possible after identification. It shall be the responsibility of the City to assist the Engineer to secure right of entry to private property for the purpose of performing any surveying, environmental, and/or soil boring activities. In pursuance of the TxDOT's policy with the general public, the Engineer shall not commit acts which will result in damages to private property and the Engineer will make every effort to comply with the wishes and address the concerns of private property owners. The Engineer shall perform their work in accordance with the TxDOT's Utility Accommodation Policy, and the Houston District's The TxDOT Utility Cooperative Management Process. The Engineer shall prepare drawings early in the design phase (30%) to be used as exhibits in utility agreements. The exhibits shall be prepared using English units. The Engineer shall show existing utilities, including those in conflict with construction on this project. The Engineer shall prepare plans to avoid or minimize utility adjustments, where feasible. The Engineer shall implement The TxDOT Utility Cooperative Management Process and is responsible for sending out notices, with copies of exhibits and plans, including all milestone submittals. The Engineer shall compile, maintain and update a Utility Conflict List to include phone log and all correspondence to the utility owners. The Engineer shall provide the most Page 2 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX current copy of the conflict list to the TxDOT at each milestone submittal, and shall be responsible for coordination with utility companies to resolve conflicts. The Utility Conflict List shall identify the owner of the facility, the contact person (with address and telephone number), location of conflict (station and offset), type of facility, expected clearance date, status, effect on construction and type of adjustment necessary. After identifying all conflicting utilities, and in coordination with the TxDOT's Project Manager, the Engineer shall arrange for (send plans and invitations in a timely manner) and attend utility meetings with all utility owners and other interested parties or agencies that are identified to be within the proposed project's area. This meeting will be held at the Houston District office. The purpose of this meeting is to ensure that all utility owners and area entities are aware of the scope and relevant details of the proposed project. The Engineer shall be responsible for writing and documenting the meeting minutes and other follow-up work with utility owners, if necessary. The information obtained at each utility meeting shall be included as part of the milestone submittals. The Engineer shall determine prior to 30 percent milestone submittal if Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) will be required for this project. If SUE work is required. the City will provide these services. The Engineer shall make every effort to prevent detours and utility relocations from extending beyond the proposed right of way lines. If it is necessary to obtain additional right of way, permanent or temporary easements and /or right of entry, the Engineer shall notify the City in writing of the need and justification for such action. The Engineer shall identify and coordinate with all utility companies for relocations required. The Engineer shall prepare any exhibits necessary for Utility and drainage district approvals, and other governmental/regulatory agencies. specific to the project. The Engineer shall review the findings of the environmental document study; include 11" x 17" copies of the Environmental Permits to be inserted into the final PS&E, if applicable. Any applicable project specific maintenance agreements provided by the City should be inserted by the Engineer into the final PS&E. The Engineer shall coordinate through the City's Project Manager for the development of the PS&E with any local entity having jurisdiction or interest in the project (e.g. drainage district, county, municipal utility district, etc.). The Engineer shall prepare exhibits for and attend meetings with the public, as requested by the TxDOT. The Engineer will participate in the public involvement process including one public meeting as needed to support the project. The Engineer will provide the Comprehensive Drainage Impact Study (including the HEC -1, HEC -2 and HEC -RAS, if desired), and drainage and flood control impact Page 3 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX evaluation material, preliminary drainage engineering information related to the Engineer's focus area of design for approval by the City, Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, and the TxDOT. The Engineer will provide available Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance study maps and studies. The Engineer shall prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SW3P), including details and pay quantities. The City will provide the Notice of Intent. The preliminary cost estimate for the proposed improvements shall be prepared by the Engineer utilizing the Houston District's 12 month average unit prices. The Engineer shall not move forward with performing detailed PS&E (60%, 90% and final submittals) until the TxDOT approves the 30% milestone submittal. The PS&E shall be complete and organized in accordance with Stand alone Manual Notice 00-1 entitled "Organization of Plan Sheets" and as identified by the latest edition of the Consultant Contract Administration's "Guidelines for Milestone Submittals". The PS&E package shall be suitable for the bidding and awarding of a construction contract, and in accordance with the latest TxDOT's policies and procedures, and the Houston District's PS&E Checklist. The Engineer shall also comply with the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities requirements. The Engineer shall use Computer -Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) to fully develop all drawings. The CADD drawings developed shall be compatible with the TxDOT using Microstation V8 or V81. The computer graphics files furnished must comply with Attachment G of this contract, entitled TxDOT's Document and Information Exchange. The Engineer shall provide earthwork cross-section data files in a GEOPAK format as an evolving electronic data file and the latest version of the Houston District's PS&E checklist at each milestone submittal. The TxDOT cross section criteria files should be used to generate design cross sections. New criteria files should only be developed in the absence of applicable existing TxDOT criteria files. The PS&E shall be developed in English units using the TxDOT 2014 specifications and provisions. The final plan sheets shall be electronic and pdf versions, size 11" x 17", signed, sealed and dated by a Professional Engineer registered in the TxDOT of Texas. The plans shall be noted as copyrighted with the TxDOT's logo. PS&E for the above work shall be prepared in accordance with the applicable requirements of the TxDOT's Specifications, Standards and Manuals. Whenever possible, the TxDOT's standard drawings, standard specifications, or previously approved special provisions and/or special specifications shall be used. If a special provision or a special specification must be developed or modified for this project, it shall be in the TxDOT's format and, to the extent possible, incorporate references to approved TxDOT test procedures. Any specifications developed by the Engineer shall be submitted to the TxDOT for approval Page 4 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX prior to inclusion in the PS&E. The Engineer shall sign, seal, and date all project specific modifications to standard drawings The Engineer shall make submittals, as defined by the milestones in Attachment "D" of the contract, and in accordance with the latest TxDOT's policies and procedures. The submittals shall consist of twelve (12) 11"x17" paper sets. The Engineer shall reply to each comment either within the plan set or by separate cover letter. The Engineer shall make all agreed upon changes to the submitted documents before the next scheduled submittal. The Engineer may be required to meet with the City and TxDOT Project Managers monthly to report on progress. After each meeting with the City and any other meeting, the Engineer shall prepare meeting minutes, solicit and incorporate participants' comments, distribute the minutes, submit a memorandum summarizing the events, including an ACTION ITEM LIST, within five (5) working days of the meeting. The Engineer may be asked to incorporate into the project PS&E package, additional plans, specifications and quantities developed by others. The Engineer shall insert the package. number sheets, and update the Index of Sheets and provide a construction cost estimate of the plans developed by others. This work will be handled by supplemental agreement. The Engineer shall prepare a design time schedule using the latest version of Microsoft Project. The design time schedule shall indicate tasks, subtasks, critical dates, milestones, deliverables. review requirements in a format that depicts the interdependence of the various items and shall be updated monthly and submitted with the invoice. The Engineer shall provide assistance to City and TxDOT personnel in interpreting the schedule. Milestone submittals shall be at 30%, 60% 90% and final. If the Engineer cannot meet the scheduled milestone review date they are to advise the City and TxDOT in writing. The Engineer shall prepare a construction time determination, using the latest version of Primavera software in accordance with the TxDOT's Administrative Circular No. 17-93 be submitted one month prior to the 90 % milestone submittal. The Engineer shall provide assistance to City and TxDOT personnel in interpreting the schedules. In addition to scheduling software set forth above, reports and/or spreadsheets prepared in connection with these services shall be in the Microsoft (MS) Office XP software. The Engineer shall be required to maintain compatible versions to the TxDOT's software packages. The project's engineering work may be inspected by the City, TxDOT and the Federal Highway Administration in the offices of the Engineer, except for the field work which shall be performed on-site, and the sub -consultant work which will be performed in the office of the sub -consultant. After notice to proceed is given in writing, the PS&E for the Page 5 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX work outlined above shall be completed and submitted to the City within the negotiated contract period per the identified milestones in the schedule. All documents submitted to the City and TxDOT shall be accompanied by a letter of transmittal which shall include, but need not be limited to, road name, project limits, county, CSJ, and contract number. The Engineer shall designate one Texas Registered Professional Engineer to be responsible throughout the project for project management and all communications, including billing, with the TxDOT. The Engineer shall prepare and execute contracts with sub -consultants, monitor sub - consultant activities (staff and schedule), and review and recommend approval of sub - consultant invoices. Once sub -consultant contracts are executed, the Engineer is to provide copies of each sub -consultant contract to TxDOT. Any subsequent amendment to the Engineer's contract with TxDOT by supplemental agreement requiring services to be performed by a sub -consultant shall require an amendment to the sub -consultant contract as well. This is to be reviewed and approved by TxDOT. The Engineer shall implement their Quality Assurance/Quality Control program prior to submitting plans to the City for each of the milestones. Additionally, the Engineer shall provide evidence of their internal review process to be submitted at each milestone. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents are submitted. The Engineer shall submit all quantity take -off calculations as evidence that a quality control review has taken place at the 90%, 95% and final milestone submittals. The Engineer shall meet with the City monthly or as needed to discuss progress of work and resolve any questions of design during the PS&E preparation. Detailed description of work by Function Code: ROUTE & DESIGN STUDIES (Function Code 110) A. Data Collection. The Engineer shall collect, review and evaluate data described below. The Engineer shall notify the City in writing whenever the Engineer finds disagreement with the information or documents: 1. Data, if available, from the City or TxDOT, including "as -built plans", existing schematics, right-of-way maps, SUE mapping, existing cross sections, existing mapping, environmental documents. existing channel and drainage easement data, PMIS data, identified endangered species. identified hazardous material sites, current unit bid price information, current special provisions, special specifications, and standard drawings. Page 6 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX Documents for existing and proposed development along proposed route from local municipalities and local ordinances related to project development. Utility plans and documents from appropriate municipalities and agencies. Readily available flood plain information and studies from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, local municipalities and other governmental agencies in addition to that provided by the TxDOT. B. Field Reconnaissance. The Engineer shall conduct field reconnaissance and collect data including a photographic record (to be maintained in Engineer's office) of notable existing features. C. Design Concept Conference. The Engineer, in cooperation with the City and TxDOT shall plan, attend and document a Design Concept Conference (DCC) to be held prior to the 30 percent milestone submittal. Personnel from the City and TxDOT's Houston District will participate. The conference will provide for a brainstorming session in which decision makers, stakeholders and technical personnel may discuss and agree on: 1. Trail and drainage design parameters 2. Engineering and environmental constraints 3. Project development schedule 4. Other issues as identified by the City and TxDOT 5. Identify any Design Exceptions and waivers or both. if applicable 6. Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate D. Trail and Hydraulic Design Criteria. The Engineer shall design the project according to the latest City of Pearland, Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, Harris County Flood Control, AASHTO, and TxDOT's design criteria. The Engineer shall supply project specific design criteria (typical sections, estimate, design exceptions, etc.) to be inserted into the Design Elements form and submitted electronically for discussion at the DCC. E. Preliminary Cost Estimate. The Engineer shall prepare a preliminary construction cost estimate using Houston District's 12 month average unit rates for discussion at the DCC. F. Geotechnical Borings. The Engineer shall determine the location of proposed soil borings for trail pavement design, bridge design, embankment settlement analysis, retaining walls, and slope stability in accordance with the latest edition of the TxDOT Geotechnical Manual. The City and TxDOT will review and provide comments for a boring layout submitted by the Engineer showing the general location and depths of the proposed borings. Once the Engineer receives the City's and TxDOT's review comments they shall perform soil borings (field work), soil testing and prepare the boring logs in accordance with the latest Page 7 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX edition of the TxDOT Geotechnical Manual and Houston District's procedures and design guidelines. All geotechnical work should be performed in accordance with the latest version of the TxDOT Geotechnical Manual. The Engineer shall review field logs and assign laboratory testing. All testing shall be performed in accordance with the latest version of the TxDOT Manual of Test Procedures. ASTM test procedures can be used only in the absence of the TxDOT's procedures. All soil classification should be done in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The Engineer shall perform any retaining wall analyses. This analysis should include the computation of the factor of safety for bearing capacity, global stability, overturning and sliding. In addition, the Engineer should include allowable bearing pressure. passive earth pressure, friction factor and lateral earth pressure for the retaining walls. The Engineer shall provide a signed. sealed and dated geotechnical report which contains but is not limited to soil boring locations, boring logs, laboratory test results, generalized subsurface conditions, ground water conditions. piezometer data, analyses and recommendations for settlement and slope stability of the earthen embankments, skin friction tables and design capacity curves including skin friction and point bearing. The skin friction tables and design capacity curves should be present for piling and drilled shaft foundation. The Engineer shall provide recommendations for trail concrete pavement, bridges, and retaining walls. It shall be the responsibility of the Engineer to sign, seal and date soil boring mylar sheets to be used in the PS&E package. The preparation of soil boring mylar sheets are to be in accordance with Houston District standards. The Engineer shall incorporate soil boring data sheets prepared, signed, sealed, and dated by the Geotechnical Engineer. The soil boring sheets shall be in accordance with TxDOT WINCORE software as can be found on the Texas Department of Transportation website. A separate proposal for geotechnical services is also attached in Attachment E. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES & PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (Function Code 120) A. Environmental Documentation. Each environmental service provided by the Engineer shall have a deliverable. Deliverables shall summarize the methods used for the environmental services, and shall summarize the results achieved. The summary of results shall be sufficiently detailed to provide satisfactory basis for thorough review by the State, and (where applicable) agencies with regulatory oversight. All deliverables shall meet regulatory requirements for legal sufficiency, Page 8 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX and shall adhere to the requirements for reports enumerated in the State's NEPA MOU. 1. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review For each deliverable, the Engineer shall perform quality assurance quality control (QA/QC) reviews of environmental documents and on other supporting environmental documentation to determine whether documents conform with: a. Current Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance published by the State's Environmental Affairs Division and in effect as of the date of receipt of the documents or documentation to be reviewed; b. Current state and federal laws, regulations, policies. guidance, agreements, and memoranda of understanding between the State and other state or federal agencies; and c. FHWA and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines contained in "Improving the Quality of Environmental Documents, A Report of the Joint AASHTO and American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) Committee in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration" (May 2006) for: 1. readability. and 2. Use of evidence and data in documents to support conclusions. Upon request by the State, the Engineer shall provide documentation that the QA/QC reviews were performed by qualified staff. 2. Deliverables shall contain all data acquired during the environmental service. All deliverables shall be written to be understood by the public and must be in accordance with the State's Environmental Toolkit guidance, current guidelines, policies and procedures. 3. Electronic versions of each deliverable must be written in software which is compatible to the State and must be provided in a changeable format for future use by the State. The Engineer shall supplement all hard copy deliverables with electronic copies in searchable Adobe AcrobatTM (.pdf) format, unless another format is specified. Each deliverable shall be a single, searchable .pdf file that mirrors the layout and appearance of the physical deliverable. The Engineer shall deliver the electronic files on CD -R or CD -RW media in Microsoft Windows format. 4. When the environmental service is to apply for a permit (e.g., United States Coast Guard (USCG) or United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the permit and all supporting documentation shall be the deliverable. 5. Submission of Deliverables a. Deliverables shall consist of reports of environmental services performed in addition to an Environmental Assessment (EA) document. b. The deliverables shall go through an internal quality assurance and quality control review before being sent to the State. c. All deliverables must comply with all applicable state and federal environmental laws. regulations and procedures. Page 9 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX d. On the cover page of each environmental assessment (EA), finding of no significant impact (FONSI), environmental impact statement (EIS), and record of decision (ROD) prepared under the authority granted by this MOU, and for any memorandum corresponding to any CE determination it makes, the Engineer shall insert the following language in a way that is conspicuous to the reader or include it in a CE project record: "The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT." 6. The State shall provide the State's, FHWA's and other agency comments on draft deliverables to the Engineer. The Engineer shall revise the deliverable: a. to include any State commitments, findings, agreements, or determinations (e.g., wetlands, endangered species consultation, Section 106. or Section 4(f)), required for the Transportation Activity as specified by the State; b. to incorporate the results of public involvement and agency coordination: c. to reflect mitigation measures resulting from comments received or changes in the Transportation Activity: and d. to include with the revised document a comment response form (matrix) in the format provided by the State. 7. All photographs shall be 3.5" x 5" color presentation printed on matte finish photographic paper or 3.5" x 5" color presentation printed on matte white, premium or photo quality laser or inkjet paper. All photographs shall be well focused and clearly depict details relevant to an evaluation of the project area. Provision of photographs shall be one original print of each image or electronic presentations of comparable quality. Comparable quality electronic photograph presentations shall be at least 1200 x 1600 pixel resolutions. Photographs shall be attached to separately labeled pages that clearly identify project name. project identification (ID) number, address or Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) of resource. description of the picture and direction of the photographic view. In addition to the hard -copy prints, an electronic version of each will be submitted with the same identification information as the hard -copy. B. Technical Reports/Forms Definition of technical report/forms for environmental services: report/forms detailing resource -specific studies identified during the process of gathering data to prepare an environmental document. Technical reports/forms shall be produced before an environmental document (e.g. EA) is prepared in order to identify issues early in the process. The State will determine which reports/forms will be necessary for any given project. Technical reports/forms must be prepared for the State with sufficient detail and clarity to support environmental determination(s). The environmental document will reference the technical reports/forms. Page 10 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX Environmental technical reports/forms will include appropriate National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) or federal regulatory language in addition to the purpose and methodology used in delivering the service. Technical reports/forms will include sufficient information to determine the significance of impacts. Environmental technical reports/forms to be prepared for the project are listed below: 1. Non -Archeological Historic Resources Project Coordination Request 2. Archeological Background Studies Technical Report 3. Water Resources Technical Report 4. Biological Evaluation Form and supporting information 5. Hazardous Materials Technical Report On the cover page of each biological evaluation or assessment, historic properties or cultural resources report, section 4(f) evaluation, or other analyses prepared under the authority granted by this MOU, the Engineer shall insert the following language in a way that is conspicuous to the reader or include in a CE project record: "The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT." Minimum Deliverables: (Additional deliverables to be identified based on work assigned.) 1. Draft Report/Form 2. Final Report/Form C. Categorical Exclusion (CE) Content and Format. The services to be provided by the ENGINEER include preparation of a Categorical Exclusion (CE) Determination and supporting documentation for the construction of the Green Tee Terrace Trail along Clear Creek from Barry Rose Road/Hughes Road to FM 518 in Brazoria and Harris Counties. Additional right-of-way is required. This scope of services and cost estimate is based on the project being approved as a "C" List CE Determination under 23 CFR 771.117(c) (3) — construction of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths and facilities. This CE is commonly referred to as a C3 CE. We will prepare a CE Determination with supporting documentation for final approval by the Texas Department of Transportation's (TxDOT) Houston District. 1. The CE shall meet the requirements of 23 CFR 771.117, and TAC, Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 2. The CE content shall be in sufficient detail to meet regulatory requirements for legal sufficiency. 2. The format shall follow the format specified in the SOUs. 3. The CE documentation shall be concise and shall incorporate by reference the detailed environmental studies. 4. Exhibits to be included in reports or CE documentation shall not exceed 11" by 17," and shall be in color. Text pages shall be 8.5" by 11". Exhibits and text shall be neat and reproducible via photocopying without loss of legibility. The CE Page 11 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX documentation shall be reproduced on plain white paper unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the State. 5. Submit to the State the number of copies specified of the CE documentation. The review and final copies of the CE documentation shall be delivered to the State on computer disk or via e-mail in a searchable PDF format compatible with the State's software. The Engineer shall consult with the State to identify electronic formats acceptable to the State. The State reserves the unlimited right to revise the electronic copy of the CE documentation. The State reserves the unlimited right to produce paper copies of the CE documentation. 6. The Engineer shall prepare TxDOTs Scope Development Tool to determine the environmental document classification and specific studies needed. The results from this form will be used to more accurately complete the CE supporting information. The Project Scope for Categorical Exclusions (CEs) dated February 2014 is completed when TxDOT is not the project sponsor. For this project, the City of Pearland will be the project sponsor. Therefore, this task includes the preparation of the Project Scope for CEs (Scoping Document) to document the project classification as a CE. 7. The CE Determination Form will be completed, coordinated and submitted to TxDOT for final signature and approval by TxDOT Houston District. 8. The Engineer shall prepare the draft supporting documentation to support TxDOT's CE Determination, including preparing necessary exhibits. The draft supporting documentation will be prepared and submitted to TxDOT for review and comment. 9. The Engineer shall revise the draft supporting documentation in accordance with two sets of comments from TxDOT. 10 After comments are addressed from TxDOT, the final supporting documentation will be prepared and submitted. 11. Minimum Deliverables: (Additional deliverables to be identified based on work assigned.) a. TxDOT Scope Development Tool b. Project Scope for Categorical Exclusions (CEs) c. Draft CE Determination Form for the State's Review d. Final CE Determination Form for the State's Review e. Draft Supporting Documentation for CE Determination for the State's review f. Revised Supporting Documentation for CE Determination for the State's review g. Final Supporting Documentation for CE Determination for the State's review D. Land Use and Community Impacts The proposed project would require additional right-of-way: however, no adverse land use or community impacts are anticipated. No assessment of land use and community impacts is included in this scope of work. Page 12 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX E. Environmental Justice The proposed project would require additional right-of-way; however, no disproportionately high and adverse effects on environmental justice populations are anticipated. No assessment of environmental justice is included in this scope of work. F. Limited English Proficiency The proposed project would require additional right-of-way; however, no disproportionately high and adverse effects on limited English proficiency populations are anticipated. No assessment of limited English proficiency is included in this scope of work. As part of the Public Involvement Plan, outreach to non-English speakers will be considered. G. Historic Resource Identification, Evaluation and Documentation Services (This scope is for the Non -Archeological Historic Resources Project Coordination Request.) The Engineer shall perform non -archeological historic -age resource studies related to compliance with Section 106 and Section 110 of the NHPA (36 CFR 800). Such studies include. but are not limited to non -archeological historic -age resource surveys, research and documentation efforts leading to historic context statements, nominations to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documents, and other mitigation activities such as creating, managing or updating inventories of historic -age properties. Identification, evaluation and documentation tasks shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of the Archeology and Preservation: Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines (48 FR Parts 44716 et seq. and requirements used by those of the National Park Service, and previously published in 36 CFR Part 61 (SOI Standards)). The deliverables shall summarize the methods used for the historic resources studies, and shall summarize the results achieved. Each historic resources study shall have a deliverable. The summary of results shall be sufficiently detailed to provide satisfactory basis for thorough review by the State. FHWA, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Texas Historical Commission (THC) and consulting parties. All deliverables shall be in sufficient detail to meet regulatory requirements for legal sufficiency. All deliverables shall be written to be understood by the public and must be in accordance with current Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance published by the State's Environmental Affairs Division and in effect as of the date of receipt of the documents or documentation to be reviewed and Attachment C to this contract. In accordance with the State's NEPA MOU, on the cover page of each biological evaluation or assessment, historic properties or cultural resources report, section 4(f) evaluation, or other analyses prepared under the authority granted by the MOU, the Engineer shall insert the following language in a way that is conspicuous to the Page 13 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX reader or include in a CE project record: "The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by the State pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated, to be filed, and executed by FHWA and the State." Historic resource studies shall be performed and documented at sufficient levels to satisfy THC requirements for determining the presence of and documenting historically significant properties in the project Area of Potential Effects (APE) in accordance with 36 CFR 60 and 43 TAC, Part I, Chapter 2 and current Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance published by the State's Environmental Affairs Division and in effect as of the date of receipt of the documents or documentation to be reviewed. All reports shall comply with policy, documentation standards, formats and templates provided by the State's Environmental Affairs Division in effect as of the date of the receipt of the documents. Performance of non -archeological historic -age resource studies shall include the following tasks as specified in a work authorization. Deliverables shall be transmitted to the State in electronic and paper formats and meet the requirements set for in the State's Environmental Compliance Toolkits. This scope does not include a historic resources field survey. Should a field survey be requested by TxDOT or the USACE, this would be performed under a separate scope and fee estimate. H. Archeological Background Studies (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Archeological Background Studies Technical Report.) 1. The conduct of an Archeological Background Study shall conform to current SOU for Background Studies, available from the State. 2. The Engineer shall undertake the following activities and demonstrate that these activities occurred by providing supporting data to the State. a. Review site files at the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL) and THC to determine whether previously recorded archeological sites are present in the area to be documented. Review of the Texas Archeological Sites Atlas shall be used for THC file review unless otherwise approved by the State. b. If sites are present. consult relevant site forms and archeological reports to determine the characteristics of the sites. c. Produce a clearly reproducible map, based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5' topographic maps, indicating areas where recorded archeological sites are present. d. Review Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil maps, Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG) geological maps, historic maps, aerial photographs, planning documents, and USGS topographic maps to determine the general characteristics of the study area with respect to the identification Page 14 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX of areas where preservation of archeological historic properties and SALs is likely and unlikely. 3. Background studies comprise a review of existing data, including — but not limited to — the Texas Archeological Sites Atlas, geologic maps, soil maps, aerial photographs, and historic maps. Based on this review, the Technical Expert shall identify areas that require field investigation to evaluate the project's effects on archeological resources and areas in which the proposed project would have no effect on archeological resources. The Background Study shall be produced by a professional archeologist as defined in 13 TAC §26.5(52) (B). 4. This scope does not include an archeological field survey. Should a field survey be requested by TxDOT or the USACE. this would be performed under a separate scope and fee estimate. A separate proposal for archeological services is also attached in Attachment E. I. Air Quality Studies The proposed project is located within an ozone non -attainment area: however, bicycle and pedestrian facilities are exempt from regional conformity (40 CFR 93.126). No air quality studies are included in this scope of work. J. Traffic Noise Studies The proposed trail project is not a Type I roadway project and does not involve the construction of a highway on new location or the physical alteration of an existing highway; therefore, no traffic noise impacts are anticipated and a traffic noise study is not included in this scope of work. K. Water Quality Studies (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Water Resources Technical Report.) The Engineer shall: 1. Address all water quality studies in accordance with Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act as administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 2. Identify if the project is located within five miles of an impaired assessment unit and within the watershed of the impaired assessment unit. 3. Identify whether the project drains to any impaired assessment unit. 4. Provide the location of the project within the watershed of the impaired assessment unit. 5. Identify the impaired assessment unit number, segment name, and segment number. 6. Identify the pollutant(s) in the discharge for which the water body is listed, and the year of the 303(d) list used in the assessment. 7. If the impaired assessment unit has a Total Maximum Daily Load that has been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency, provide: a. the name and date of the Total Maximum Daily Load. b. the name and date of any corresponding Implementation Plan. and Page 15 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX c. a discussion of whether the project is consistent with the approved Total Maximum Daily Load and Implementation Plan. 8. If unit does not have a Total Maximum Daily Load that has been the impaired assessment approved by the Environmental Protection Agency, indicate: a. that the impaired assessment unit does not have a Total Maximum Daily Load that has been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency, and b if the project could discharge the pollutant identified in (d) above. If yes, discuss measures that will be taken to prevent or reduce the likelihood of such a discharge. 9. Discuss the Best Management Practices that will be used -particularly at the discharge point to the water body to meet other water quality regulations, such as vegetative swales, silt fencing, compliance with the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES). L. Determining Impacts to Waters of the United States, including Wetlands (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Water Resources Technical Report.) 1. The Engineer shall identify all waters within the boundaries of the project area. 2. The Engineer shall make a preliminary determination of USACE jurisdiction. Restrict the level of effort to identification without formal delineation. 3. The Engineer shall delineate waters of the United States, including wetlands. a. Provide documentation which shall include all field work and compilation of field documentation for wetland delineations. Wetland delineations shall be performed in accordance with the current USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1) and, if appropriate, the Great Plains. Arid West. or Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Supplement to Technical Report Y-87-1. b. Stake wetland boundaries in the field. c. Map the boundaries of the waters of the United States with the global positioning system per guidance from the USACE-Galveston. 4. When required, the State will provide a land survey of wetland boundaries. 5. When the environmental service is to apply for a permit, the permit and supporting documentation shall be the report and deliverable. 6. Draft and Final Deliverable. a. The Engineer shall produce a draft and final report of wetland determinations and delineations. The draft report will be submitted to the State for review and approval by the State and USACE. In the final report. address State and USACE comments from the draft report. The revised final report shall be delivered to the State within 30 days of receipt of comments from the State or USACE. b. The location of all sites, cities, villages. highways, rivers and other features or place names discussed in the text and situated in the project locale shall be shown on the appropriate figure. All tables, figures and maps shall have a number, title, appropriate explanatory note and a Page 16 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX source reference. In addition, where applicable, figures and all maps shall display a title, north arrow, scale, legend and source reference. c. The report shall be in the following format: 1. Cover Sheet In accordance with the State's NEPA MOU, on the cover page of each biological evaluation or assessment, historic properties or cultural resources report, section 4(f) evaluation, or other analyses prepared under the authority granted by the MOU, the Engineer shall insert the following language in a way that is conspicuous to the reader or include in a CE project record: "The environmental review, consultation. and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated, to be filed, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT." 2. Introduction a) Who authorized the wetland delineation. b) Why the wetland delineation is being done. c) Location of site (USGS 7 5' Map). d) Date of field visit(s). e) Identification of delineators. 3. Methods a) Brief description of the method used. b) State any modification of the method c) Source of existing information. 4. Results and Discussion a) Description of the site. b) Topography of the site. c) Plant communities of the site. d) Soil types identified on the site. e) Hydrology information of the site. f) Existing wetland mapping (e.g., NWI, state, and local). 5. Findings a) Types of wetlands identified on the site (e.g., Cowardin, et al. 1979). 1. Description of wetlands identified. 2. Locations of wetlands. 3. Area of wetlands (in acres). 4. Contrast with non -wetland. 5. How was the wetland boundary chosen (e.g., feature on landscape). b) Types of other waters of the United States identified on the site. 1. Description of the other waters of the United States. 2. Locations of the other waters of the United States. 3. Area of the other waters of the United States. 4. Contrast with non -wetlands. Page 17 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX 5. How was the other water of the United States boundary chosen (e.g., feature on landscape). Conclusion a) Table summary of total area and types of wetlands and other regulated waters. b) A map showing each location where a Wetland Data Form was completed. c) Statement regarding the need for permits. d) Caution that final authority rest with the appropriate agencies. Literature Cited. a) Appendix (Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms and, if required, Atypical Situation Data Forms). M. Floodplain Impacts (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Water Resources Technical Report.) The Engineer shall determine whether the Transportation Activity has the potential to affect floodplains. Document Trinity River Corridor Development Certificate Regulatory Zone requirements (Dallas and Fort Worth Districts), and International Boundary Water Commission (IBWC) requirements (Transportation Activity within the floodplain of the Rio Grande) if the project is within the area covered by these regulations. Studies for floodplain impacts shall fulfill the requirements of Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650, Subpart A. 1. Briefly describe the watershed characteristics of the study area in terms of land uses and changes in land use that may affect stream discharge. 2. Briefly describe the streams in the study area, including evidence of stream migration, down cutting, or aggradations. 3. Identify the presence and nature (e.g., zone A, zone AE, zone AE with floodway) of any Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplains. Include the panel number. 4. Indicate the existence of any significant development associated with the mapped area and identify the jurisdiction responsible for the floodplain. 5. Identify the locations where an alternative will encroach on the base (100 -year) floodplain ("encroachments"), where an alternative will support incompatible floodplain development and the potential impacts of encroachments and floodplain development. This identification should be included in the text and on a map. 6. Include a list of all jurisdictions having control over floodplains for each alternative. 7. Where an encroachment or support of incompatible floodplain development results in impacts, the report shall provide more detailed information on the location, impacts and appropriate mitigation measures. In addition, if any alternative (I) results in a floodplain encroachment or supports incompatible floodplain development having significant impacts, or (2) requires a commitment to a particular structure size or type. the report shall include an evaluation and discussion of practicable alternatives to the structure or to the significant encroachment. The report shall Page 18 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX include exhibits which display the alternatives. the base floodplains and, where applicable. the regulatory floodplains. 8. For each alternative encroaching on a designated or regulatory floodplain, the report shall provide a preliminary indication of whether the encroachment would be consistent with or require a revision to the regulatory floodplain. If the preferred alternative encroaches on a regulatory floodplain, the report shall discuss the consistency of the action with the regulatory floodplain. In addition, the report shall document coordination with FEMA and local or state agencies with jurisdiction indicating that revision would be acceptable or that a revision is not required. 9. If the preferred alternative includes a floodplain encroachment having significant impacts, the report shall include a finding that it is the only practicable alternative as required by 23 CFR 650, Subpart A. The finding shall refer to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650, Subpart A. In such cases the report shall document compliance with the Executive Order 11988 requirements and shall be supported by the following information: a) The reasons why the proposed action must be located in the floodplain; b) The alternatives considered and why they were not practicable; and c) A statement indicating whether the action conforms to applicable state or local floodplain protection standards. N. Stormwater Permits (Section 402 of the Clean Water Act) (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Water Resources Technical Report.) The Engineer shall: 1. Describe the need to use the TPDES General Permit, TX 150000. The text will describe how the project will comply with the terms of the TPDES, including the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 2. Describe the need for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) notification. List MS4 participating municipalities. O. USACE Nationwide Permits (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Water Resources Technical Report.) 1. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). The Engineer shall determine whether the Transportation Activity requires a Section 404 Nationwide permit and upon approval by the State, prepare and submit permit applications (Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) to USACE and obtain the permits. PCNs will be prepared in accordance with current USACE policies and regulations. The preparation of design drawings is not included in this scope of work. 2. The Engineer shall provide the State with documentation (including all original correspondence) of consultation with USACE and TCEQ. 3. The Engineer shall keep the State informed during the permit coordination process. Page 19 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX P. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) of the Water Resources Technical Report.) The Engineer shall identify water body modifications and impacts to wildlife. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) applies to projects that would result in the control or modification of a natural stream or body of water and would require a Section 404 Individual Permit. Q. Threatened or Endangered Species (This scope is for the Biological Evaluation Form and supporting information associated with the form.) The Engineer shall perform biological services. 1. Surveys for Protected Species or Habitat of Protected Species based on the most current State and TPWD Memorandum of Understanding with Natural Resources Agencies and Memorandum of Agreement Between State and TPWD for Finalization of 2013 MOU. The Engineer shall: a) Perform surveys of protected species or habitat of protected species. This shall include: 1. All species listed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as threatened or endangered or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered (50 CFR §17.11-12), 2. All species that are candidates for review for listing by USFWS as threatened or endangered (per most recently updated list in Federal Register), 3. Species listed as threatened or endangered species or species of greatest conservation need (SGCN) by the State of Texas Threatened and Endangered Species Listings, Texas Park and Wildlife Department (TPWD), 4. Species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (50 CFR §10.13) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668c). b) Examine existing data to determine the likelihood that rare species, protected species. their habitat. or designated critical habitat (per 50 CFR §17.94-95) could be impacted by the Transportation Activity. Existing data shall include the Element Occurrence Identification (EOID) records of the TPWD Natural Diversity Database, following the Guidelines set forth in the most current version of TPWD's Guidelines for TXNDD Data Analysis in TxDOT Environmental Documents. c) Perform an effect determination pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for all federally listed species. A determination of impact must be included for all state -listed species. The determination of effect and impact must be supported by evidence. and may require a detailed assessment. Any technical reports used to support the determination(s) must be referenced and provided to the State. Page 20 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX d) Determine whether critical habitat is present in the study area and whether the Transportation Activity will affect that critical habitat. e) Furnish the State with completed Biological Evaluation Form and Technical Expert's field notes. f) Coordinate between the State and USFWS or TPWD as directed by the State to ensure proper rules, regulations and policies are followed for biological services. All coordination between the Technical Expert and resource agencies shall be approved in advance by the State. g) Habitat Analysis and Characterization of Project Study Area. The Engineer shall perform an analysis and characterization of habitat and habitat impacts for the study area and documented on the Biological Evaluation Form. The habitat analysis shall be based on the most current State and TPWD Memorandum of Understanding With Natural Resources Agencies and Memorandum of Agreement Between State and TPWD for Finalization of 2013 MOU, Concerning Habitat Descriptions and Mitigation. 1. For transportation activities involving no new right-of-way or easements, including temporary easements, this includes: a. The habitat descriptions of habitat types (e.g., forested, prairie, riparian, floodplain, rangeland, agricultural) in the study area are based upon the 2013 MOU. b. The habitat description shall indicate the vegetative type(s) listed for the study area in the 2013 MOU. c. The habitat description shall include a description of the existing vegetation within and adjacent to the right-of-way, as per the 2013 MOU. d. The habitat description shall describe habitat for protected species if such habitat occurs within or adjacent to the right-of-way. The description shall be supplemented with topographic maps (based on USGS 7.5' maps, aerial photos, on-site photographs and per the 2013 MOU. 1. Maps and aerial photos shall be annotated to indicate the locations and areas of distinct vegetative types if any have been identified during field inspections. 2. Photographs shall illustrate representative vegetation for each vegetation type. Aerial photographs (with dates) shall be provided when available. 2. If the vegetation within the right-of-way does not match the description as per the 2013 MOU or if there is an unusual difference between the vegetation in the right-of-way and outside the right-of-way, details shall be included in the description to clearly explain the differences in vegetative content between the existing vegetation and the 2013 MOU 3. For transportation activities involving new right-of-way or easements, including temporary easements, the habitat description shall address the entire study area. For projects with multiple alternatives, all alternatives shall be described to the same level of detail. If lack of access to the new location right-of-way limits field observation for the habitat description, Page 21 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX existing published sources shall be used to provide an estimate. All elements of description required for projects with no new right-of-way (above) shall be included. Land use within and outside the proposed right-of-way shall be described. In addition, the description of vegetation in the new right-of-way or easements shall include the following: a. Dominant Species for each vegetation stratum (i.e., tree, shrub. vine, herbaceous [grass and forbs}) present, b Height of trees (range), if present, c. Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) of trees (range and average), if present. d. Percent canopy cover of trees, if present, e. Acreage for each vegetation type present. 4. The habitat analysis shall contain a description of anticipated impacts to the following: a. Any vegetation, broken down by plant community (as above), b. Unusual vegetation features (as above), c. Special habitat features (as above), d. Habitat for any protected species (as above), e. Any other habitat feature identified by and considered to be important to the State's District. Note: The description of anticipated impacts shall be based on impacts that can be predicted as a result of construction activities and the kind(s) of facility proposed for the Transportation Activity. If the Technical Expert believes that the State has not provided sufficient engineering and other data to support a description of anticipated impacts, notify the State. and the Technical Expert and the State shall negotiate an appropriate level of description of anticipated impacts. Survey Reports and Habitat Analyses included in the appendices of the Biological Evaluation Form shall include: a. Sources for and results of preliminary data collection, b. The name(s) of the person(s) performing the fieldwork, c. Dates of fieldwork. d. Weather conditions at the time of the survey(s), e. Results of TPWD Natural Diversity Database (TXNDD) search as per current TPWD Guidelines for TXNDD Data Analysis in TxDOT Environmental Documents, f. Protected species and habitat for which survey was performed, g. Whether the protected species is absent or present, h. Whether potential habitat for protected species (including designated critical habitat) is present. i. Survey protocols or other methods used, j. Analysis of the Transportation Activity's potential to affect species, habitat. and designated critical habitat, k. Appropriate ArcGIS shape files, 7.5 minute USGS topographic map(s), and aerial photographs showing all areas surveyed for protected Page 22 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX species, habitat for protected species, designated critical habitat boundaries, if any, and location(s) of protected species occurrence; and, I. Photographs typical of the area(s) surveyed. m. In accordance with the State's NEPA MOU, On the cover page of each biological evaluation or assessment. historic properties or cultural resources report. section 4(f) evaluation, or other analyses prepared under the authority granted by the MOU, the Engineer shall insert the following language in a way that is conspicuous to the reader or include in a CE project record: "The environmental review. consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried -out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT." h) Analysis of Stream Modifications and Associated Habitats. The Engineer shall provide a habitat impact analysis when modification of a stream channel is included as part of the Transportation Activity where the streambed is being relocated, straightened, altered (deepened or widened), or cleaned as a part of road or bridge construction or as an easement involving drainage improvements 1. The report on the habitat impact analysis shall describe impacts; both direct and indirect, to the adjacent riparian habitats associated with stream modifications, and shall include: a. A description of existing vegetation that includes all elements listed in this attachment, b. Areal extent of temporary and permanent impacts, in acres, including impacts in temporary or permanent easements outside the State's proposed right of way, c. Type of impacts proposed to affect the channel (e.g., channelization. fill, excavation) and adjacent surfaces (e.g., vegetation clearing for equipment operation). 2. Stream Modification and Associated Habitats Reports shall include: a. Sources for and results of preliminary data collection, b. The name(s) of the person(s) performing the fieldwork, c. Dates of fieldwork, d. Weather conditions at the time of the survey(s), e. Whether the protected species is absent or present, f. Survey protocols or other methods used, g. Analysis of the Transportation Activity's potential to affect the channel, h. Appropriate ArcGIS shape files, 7.5 minute USGS topographic maps, and aerial photographs showing all areas surveyed; and, i. Photographs typical of the area(s) surveyed. Page 23 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX R. Invasive Species No assessment of invasive species is included in this scope of work other than completing the Biological Evaluation Form. S. Beneficial Landscaping No assessment of beneficial landscaping is included in this scope of work other than completing the Biological Evaluation Form. T. Farmland Impacts No assessment of farmland impacts is included in this scope of work other than completing the Biological Evaluation Form. U. Initial Assessment of Hazardous Materials Impacts (This scope is for the Hazardous Materials Technical Report.) The Engineer shall: 1. Perform a hazardous material Initial Site Assessment (ISA) for potential hazardous materials impacts. The ISA shall determine the potential for encountering hazardous materials in the study area, including possible environmental liability, increased handling requirements (e.g. soil or groundwater), and potential construction worker health and safety issues. 2. The performance of the hazardous materials ISA will be sufficient to satisfy the State's current Environmental Compliance Toolkit for Hazardous Materials Initial Site Assessments, available from the State. 3. Determine the appropriate project -specific level of inquiry for the ISA. Consider preliminary project design and right-of-way requirements, including project excavation requirements, anticipated right of way acquisition, and the demolition or modification of structures. 4. Produce and submit to the State a completed ISA using the State's ISA Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance format. 5. The Engineer's completed ISA shall include, when applicable, full copies of list search reports, including maps depicting locations, copies of agency file information, photographs, recommendations, and any other supporting information gathered by the Engineer to complete the ISA. 6. Based on the ISA information, the Engineer shall provide the State a report discussing the known or potential hazardous materials impacts suitable for inclusion in the environmental document. The report of hazardous materials impacts shall include, when applicable: a) A concise summary of relevant information gathered during the ISA, including sufficient information to show that the study area for the Transportation Activity was adequately investigated for known or potential hazardous material contamination. b) A concise description of the scope of the hazardous materials ISA, disclosure of any limitations of the assessment, and a statement indicating who performed the assessment. Page 24 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX c) A concise summary of the findings of the assessment for each alternative considered, along with an opinion of the potential of an identified site to impact the project during construction. d) A discussion of any commitments recommended for performing further investigation of suspect areas, and justification for postponement of further investigation. e) A summary of efforts to be employed by the State to avoid or minimize involvement with known or suspected hazardous material contamination sites during construction, and justification for not avoiding contaminated sites within the preferred alternative or corridor alignment. f) Disclosure of known or suspected hazardous material contamination that is anticipated to be encountered during construction. g) A discussion of any required or recommended special considerations, contingencies or provisions to handle known or suspected hazardous material contamination during right-of-way negotiation and acquisition, property management, design and construction. h) A summary of any early coordination or consultation conducted with the regulatory agencies, local entities or property owners. i) A discussion of any further hazardous materials related coordination with, and approvals or permits required from, the regulatory agencies or other entities. 7 Should the findings of the ISA conclude that additional investigation, special considerations, or other commitments from the State are required during future stages of project development, the Engineer shall review those findings and commitments with the State prior to completing the hazardous materials discussion for the environmental document. V. Section 4(f) Evaluations. The proposed project would require additional right-of-way: however, no Section 4(f) impacts are anticipated. No Section 4(f) Evaluations are included in this scope of work. W. Section 6(f) Evaluation The proposed project would require additional right-of-way; however, no Section 6(f) impacts are anticipated. No Section 6(f) Evaluations are included in this scope of work. X. Indirect and Cumulative Impacts Analysis The proposed project would require additional right-of-way; however, no adverse indirect or cumulative impacts are anticipated. No Indirect and Cumulative Impacts Analysis is included in this scope of work. Y. Project Status Meetings Environmental staff will participate in up to ten (10) project status meetings with the City of Pearland. Page 25 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX Z. Reference Documents The Engineer shall adhere to the content of the following reference documents in the development of the assigned documentation: 1. TxDOT On -Line Environmental Compliance Toolkit guidance. 2. The TxDOT On -Line Environmental Manual FIELD SURVEYING & PHOTOGRAMMETRY (Function Code 150) A. Field Surveying. The Engineer shall verify the benchmark coordinates and establish the horizontal and vertical control for the project. The Engineer shall provide supplemental field surveying services necessary to verify the Digital Terrain Model (DTM), produce topographic maps, establish the project baseline on the ground. locate and tie existing utilities to the project baseline, to tie the soil boring locations, and update topography. Coordinate geometry shall be based on and tied into TxDOT plane surface coordinate system. The Engineer shall: 1. Determine Project Baseline: The project base line must be coincidental with, or parallel to, the stationed "Design Center Line." Base line control points shall be established using 15M(ASTM) (5/8 inch) iron rods, 36 inches long, at P.C.' s, P.I.'s and P.T.'s of horizontal curves and at 1000 feet maximum intervals on tangents. Baseline control points shall be offset with set iron rods on both sides near the existing ROW lines at a measured distance. If available, coordinate to field tie to the Project baseline set by adjacent Engineers for consistency and accuracy. Horizontal and Vertical GPS Surveys: The coordinate location and/or elevation of center panel points based on GPS surveys conducted by the Surveyor shall meet standards of accuracy as set forth below. Reference may be made to standards of accuracy for First Authorization surveys as described in the Federal Geodetic Control Committee publication entitled Geometric Geodetic Accuracy Standards and Specifications for Using GPS Relative Positioning Techniques, reprinted with corrections August 1, 1989. The accuracy standard at the 95 percent confidence level for First Authorization Surveys may be calculated using the formula s = le1 + ((1. l/)(/ l where, s= maximum allowable error in centimeters d= distance in kilometers between any two stations p= the minimum geometric relative position accuracy standard in parts per million (10 ppm) Page 26 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX e= base error in centimeters (1.0 cm.) DATUM. All coordinates shall be based on the North American datum (NAD) 83 (1993 Adjustment). All elevations shall be based on the North American vertical datum (NAVD) of 1988 All traverses conducted by the Surveyor shall be tied to the National Geodetic Survey system, either directly or indirectly as follows: a. The Surveyor shall make sufficient measurements to existing National Geodetic Survey monuments to assess the angular, horizontal and vertical closure of each traverse to the extend applicable. The Surveyor shall make sufficient measurements to monuments established by the TxDOT to assess the angular, horizontal and vertical closure of each traverse to the extent applicable. All monuments established by the TxDOT for purposes of aerial photography control are based on the National Geodetic Survey system. Locate previously set benchmarks established by TxDOT (TxDOT Datum): establish benchmark circuit (run levels) throughout the Project: establish additional benchmarks at intervals not to exceed 1,000 feet for the limits of the Project; tie benchmarks (station/offset) to Project baseline. Benchmarks shall be 20M (ASTM) (3/4 -inch) diameter, 48 inches long, located near the existing ROW line at a measured distance. All benchmark circuits shall be tied to the TxDOT's elevation datum. Perform the benchmark circuits in accordance with good surveying practices. The Surveyor shall verify the closure and submit adjustments to TxDOT for approval prior to beginning the field surveys. Provide 8 1/2" x 11' location sketches of horizontal and vertical benchmarks The Engineer shall also provide 11' x 17" overall sketch showing bearings and distances between control monuments (benchmarks) and tied benchmarks (i.e. HCFCD, TSARP, FEMA, GPS points, etc.) These sketches shall be signed, sealed and dated by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS). HORIZONTAL GROUND CONTROL The coordinate location of the traverse points shall be based on traverses conducted by the Surveyor meeting standards of accuracy as set forth below. Reference may be made to standards of accuracy for Second Order, Class II, horizontal control traverses as described in the latest edition Federal Geodetic Control Committee publication entitled Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks 1984. Page 27 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX a. Azimuth closure shall not exceed 4.5 seconds times the square root of the number of traverse segments. b. Position closure after azimuth adjustment shall exceed 1 in 20,000. c. In cases where a traverse approaches but does not entirely meet these standards of accuracy and the Surveyor has assured itself those gross errors, mistakes and blunders have been eliminated, the Surveyor shall submit the traverse data to the TxDOT for further review. The TxDOT will make a determination as to the acceptability of the traverse as an exception to the standard and notify the Surveyor accordingly. VERTICAL GROUND CONTROL Elevations established on the benchmarks shall be conducted by the Surveyor meeting standards of accuracy as set forth below. Reference may be made to standards of accuracy for third order vertical control traverses as described in the latest edition of the Federal Geodetic Control Committee publication entitled Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks. a. Vertical closure shall not exceed 0.05 feet times the square root of the distance in miles. b. In case where a traverse approaches but does not entirely meet these standards of accuracy and the Surveyor has assured itself that gross errors, mistakes and blunders have been eliminated, the Surveyor shall submit the traverse data to the TxDOT for review. The TxDOT will make a determination as to the acceptability of the traverse as an exception to the standard, and the TxDOT will notify the Surveyor accordingly. c. Document field work and submit field data to the TxDOT. The Engineer's Surveyor shall prepare a Survey Control Index Sheet and a Horizontal and Vertical Control Sheet, signed, sealed and dated by the professional engineer in direct responsible charge of the surveying and the responsible Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS) for insertion into the plan set. The Survey Control Index Sheet shows an overall view of the project control and the relationship or primary monumentation and control used in the preparation of the project; whereas, the Horizontal and Vertical Control sheet identifies the primary survey control and the survey control monumentation used in the preparation of the project. Both the Survey Control Index Sheet and the Horizontal and Vertical Control Sheet should be used in conjunction with each other. The following information should be shown on the Survey Control Index Sheet: Page 28 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX a. Overall view of the project and primary control monuments set for control of the project. b. Identification of the control points c. Baseline or centerline as provided by Engineer d. Graphic (Bar) Scale e. North Arrow f. Placement of note "The survey control information has been accepted and incorporated into this PS&E" which is signed, sealed and dated by a Texas Professional Engineer g. RPLS signature, seal and date The following information should be shown on the Horizontal and Vertical Control Sheet: a. Location for each control point, showing baseline or centerline alignment and North arrow. b. Station and offset (with respect to the baseline or centerline alignments) of each identified control point. c. Basis of Datum for horizontal control (base control monument, benchmark name. number, and datum). d. Basis of Datum for the vertical control (base control monument. benchmark name, number, datum) e. Date of current adjustment of the datum. f. Monumentation set for Control (Description. District name and number and Location ties) g. Surface Adjustment Factor and unit of measurement h. Coordinates (SPC Zone and surface or grid) i. Relevant metadata j. Graphic (Bar) Scale k. Placement of note "The survey control information has been accepted and incorporated into this PS&E"which is signed, sealed and dated by a Texas Professional Engineer I. RPLS signature. seal and date m. The TxDOT's title block containing District Name, County. Road Name, and CSJ Secure right -of -entry (short of litigation), as needed for the project and the Engineer shall not commit acts which will result in damages to private property and the Engineer will make every effort to comply with the wishes and address the concerns of private property owners. Tie to existing visible underground and overhead utilities per "One Call" responses by utility owners or their representatives (location. elevation, size and direction). Page 29 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX 6. ROW staking for additional field topography related to design work. 7. Determine any changes in topography from outdated maps due to development, erosion. etc. 8. Determine type of existing material, existing pavements, etc. 9. Obtain profiles of existing drainage facilities. 10. Obtain measurement of hydraulic opening under existing bridges. 11. Obtain top of manhole and flowline elevations. type and size. etc. of manholes, inlets, and valves of utilities. 12. Provide temporary signs, traffic control, flags, safety equipment, etc. for safe execution of surveying tasks. 13. Obtain ties to existing bridges or culverts that may conflict with new construction. 14. Obtain ties to existing signage within the project limits. 15. Obtain line (PGL) and the edges of slab at bent location. 16. Tie down soil boring locations by station, offset and surface elevation. 17. Perform datum ties as required (HCFCD, COH, FEMA, etc.). If required, establish an elevation base on the TxDOT's datum to other public entities published benchmarks. 18. The Engineer's Surveyor using wetlands delineation information provided by the TxDOT shall stake and fence the areas containing wetlands. The Surveyor is to provide information back to the Engineer in an electronic file to be incorporated onto the P&P sheets. This staking and fencing at the wetland areas shall be handled under separate agreement. 19. The Surveyor shall control traffic in and near surveying operations adequately to comply with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In the event field personnel must divert traffic or close traveled lanes, a Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by the Engineer's surveyor and approved by the TxDOT prior to commencement of field work. A copy of the approved plans shall be in the possession of field personnel on the job site at all times and shall be made available to TxDOT personnel upon request. Page 30 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX 20. All standards, procedures and equipment used by the Surveyor shall be such that the results of survey shall be in accordance with Board Rule 663.15, as promulgated by the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveyors. 21. If at any time during the contract period, the Surveyor encounters unforeseen circumstances which may materially affect the scope, complexity or character of the work authorized by the TxDOT, the Surveyor shall notify the TxDOT in writing immediately with a complete description of the circumstances encountered. 22. The Surveyor shall coordinate surveying operations and horizontal and vertical control with the adjacent project's surveyor. 23. The following definitions shall apply: a. DGN-Two dimensional digital map containing natural ground features and improvements plotted in a horizontal plane along the X and Y axes. A planimetric map does not include relief elements such as spot elevations, cross-sections, or contours. b. DTM-Three dimensional digital model of the ground containing those features necessary to define surface relief. A three dimensional model does not normally contain those planimetric features not necessary to define relief. c. Horizontal and vertical ground control -Survey control points for which the X and Y coordinate and/or elevation have been determined by on the ground surveys. B. Digital Planimetric Mapping (DGN) and Digital Terrain Modeling (DTM). The Surveyor shall prepare DGN files covering the specific work location, meeting the TxDOT's standards and specifications. 2. The Surveyor shall prepare DTM files covering the specific work location, meeting the TxDOT's standards and specifications. A separate proposal for surveying services is also attached in Attachment E. ROADWAY DESIGN (Function Code 160) A. Preliminary Geometric Project Layout. The Engineer shall develop a preliminary geometric project layout (Layout) for the full length of the project to be Page 31 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX reviewed and approved by the City and TxDOT prior to the Engineer proceeding with the 30 percent milestone submittal package. The Layout shall consist of a planimetric file of existing features and the proposed improvements within the existing and any proposed ROW. The Layout shall also include the following features: existing and Proposed ROW, existing and proposed horizontal and vertical alignment and profile grade line. cross culverts. bike trail widths, cross slopes, ditch slopes, pavement structure, clear zone, corner clips, retaining walls (if applicable) guard rail (if applicable), and water surface elevations for various rainfall frequencies, etc. Existing major subsurface and surface utilities shall be shown. The proposed alignment shall avoid as much as possible the relocation of existing utilities. The Engineer shall consider American with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) requirements when developing the layout. The Layout shall be prepared in accordance with the current Roadway Design Manual. The Engineer shall also provide proposed and existing typical sections with the profile grade line (PGL). trail width, cross slopes, ROW lines, clearing widths. ditch shapes, pavement structures and ADA clearances zones depicted. B. Trail Design. The Engineer shall provide trail plan and profile drawings using CADD standards as required by the City and TxDOT. The drawings shall consist of a planimetric file of existing features and files of the proposed improvements. The roadway base map shall contain line work that depicts existing surface features obtained from the schematic drawing. Existing subsurface and surface utilities shall be shown. Existing and proposed right-of-way lines shall be shown. Plan and Profile shall be shown on same sheet. The plan view shall contain the following design elements: 1. Calculated bike trail centerlines with horizontal control points shown. The alignments shall be calculated using GEOPAK. 2. Pavement width dimensions. 3. Proposed structure locations, lengths and widths. 4. Drawing scale shall be 1"=100' 5. Control of access line, & ROW lines and easements. 6. Cross slope changes. 7. Limits of rip rap, block sod. and seeding. 8. Existing utilities and structures. 9. Benchmark information. 10. Radii callouts and American with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) compliance items. The profile view shall contain the following design elements: Page 32 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX 1. Calculated profile grade for proposed bike trail. Vertical curve data, including "K" values shall be shown. 2. Water surface elevations at major stream crossing for 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100- year storms. 3. Drawing vertical scale to be 1"=10'. The Engineer shall provide corresponding horizontal alignment data sheets. The Engineer shall provide the design of a 10 -foot wide shared use path. The design shall be consistent with the approved schematic and the current Roadway Design Manual, City of Pearland, and AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities requirements. C. Typical Sections: Typical sections shall be required for all proposed trails and structures. Typical sections shall include width of trail, clear dimensions, border widths and ROW. The typical section shall also include PGL, centerline, pavement design, longitudinal joints, side slopes, sodding and seeding limits, station limits, common proposed and existing structures including retaining walls, riprap, limits of embankment and excavation, etc. D. Cut and Fill Quantities. The Engineer shall develop an earthwork analysis to determine cut and fill quantities and provide final design cross sections at 100 feet intervals. Cross sections shall be delivered in standard GEOPAK format on 11"x17" sheets and electronic files. The Engineer shall provide all criteria and input files used to generate the design cross sections. Annotation shall include at a minimum existing and proposed right of way, side slopes (front & back), profiles, etc. Two sets of drawings shall be submitted by the Engineer at the 30% submittal. E. Plan Preparation. The Engineer shall prepare plans, profiles and typical sections for the proposed improvements. Prior to the 30% submittal the Engineer shall schedule a workshop to review profiles and cross-sections with the City and TxDOT. The TxDOT will approve the profiles and cross sections before continuing with the subsequent submittals. F. Pavement Design. The Engineer shall incorporate the pavement design approved by the TxDOT for this project. The Engineer shall assume a pavement design of 6" Concrete on 6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade. The final Pavement Design may change from this assumption. G. Pedestrian Facilities. The Engineer shall coordinate with the TxDOT to incorporate pedestrian facilities as required or shown on the project's schematic. All pedestrian and bicycle facilities must be designed in accordance with the latest Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS) and the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4t" Edition. Page 33 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX H. Miscellaneous Drawings. The Engineer shall prepare the following miscellaneous drawings: 1. Title Sheet 2. Index 3. Project Layout 4. Horizonal Alignment Data DRAINAGE DESIGN (Function Code 161) A. Data Collection The Engineer shall: 1. Collect and review all available as -built drainage plans and reports for the project location. 2. Collect and review aerial photography and available topographic information. 3. Conduct site visits. 4. Establish a datum adjustment for the existing plans to tie to the project datum based on new survey data collected for the project. 5. Identify all FEMA floodplain boundaries and collect the FIRM panels and effective models. B. Drainage Report The Engineer shall prepare a single comprehensive drainage study and report of the project area. The Engineer will include the following items: 1. Obtain existing HEC -RAS models from applicable drainage authorities to the extend possible, for use in analysis and determination of the existing 2, 5. 10, 25. 50 and 100 water surface elevations at bayous, creeks, and ditch crossings along the project. 2. Profile of tentative proposed grade line of the trail. 3. Identify the existing drainage outfalls. 4. Identify the names of existing creeks, bayous and/or ditches within the project limits. A hydraulic analysis will be performed for the following locations along Clear Creek: 1. 400 feet upstream and downstream of the one pedestrian bridge crossings and one box culvert crossing. Page 34 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX 2. Hugh Ranch Road Bridge where the trail is located. Guideline approach to the 100 year impact analysis: An impact analysis is required on bayous, creeks and ditches as related to the City of Pearland, Brazoria County Drainage District No.4, State and FEMA criteria for 10 & 100 year storm. The TxDOT required approach for impact prediction is as follows: 1. Drainage areas for the existing and proposed conditions. 2. The Engineer will identify the existing drainage outfalls. 3. Compute right of way corridor 100 year flood plain volumes for existing and proposed roadway elevations. A decrease in 100 year flood plain volumes is not allowed by the City, State or other governmental agencies, without adequate offsite mitigation. 4. Compute existing and proposed peak flows by using hydraulics and hydrologic methodology and computer models. 5. Storage computations will be based on hydrograph calculations and peak flows obtained in the item above. A mitigation volume for the 100 year storm will be computed. 6. Analyze existing and proposed drainage system and quantify the increase in 100 year peak flows resulting from the roadway improvements. 7. Hand calculations shall be provided which quantify the cut and fill within the 100 year flood plain, if any occur. 8. Prepare conceptual 100 year sheet flow analysis for project utilizing existing and proposed conditions. 9. Obtain current hydrologic and hydraulic computer models from government agencies and review and comment on the models. 10. Current models will be updated to existing condition using the available State aerial photographs, and submitted to governmental agencies as the revised existing condition model. 11.Analyze proposed roadway and outfall drainage improvements to quantify impacts top revised existing condition model. The Engineer will prepare a report signed, sealed and dated by a registered/licensed engineer and shall include all preliminary findings and impacts including recommendations on any necessary mitigation. C. Culvert Design. The Engineer shall provide layouts, drainage area maps, and design of all drainage components. The Engineer shall design all culvert design in conformance with the latest edition of State Hydraulic Manual, Houston District criteria, and any specific guidance provided by the City. Any cross drainage design shall be performed using THYSYS, THYSYS CULVERT, HEC 2 or HEC RAS. The Engineer shall coordinate with TxDOT any proposed changes to the detention systems. The City will assess the effects of such changes on the comprehensive drainage studies. Page 35 of 41 ATTACHMENT C The Engineer shall perform the following: 3. Contract Number XXX Identify areas requiring trench protection, excavation. shoring and de- watering. Prepare drainage area maps. Prepare drainage details for outlet protection, outlet structures and utility accommodation structures. Prepare drainage facility quantity summaries. Identify potential utility conflicts and design around them. wherever possible. Take into consideration pedestrian facilities, utility impacts and retaining wall, and drainage impacts. Prepare Hydraulic Data Sheets for two pedestrian bridges to be located in the preliminary design. D. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SW3P). The Engineer shall develop SW3P. The SW3P shall include text describing the plan, quantities. type and locations of erosion control devices and any required permanent erosion control measures. E. Layout, Structural Design and Detailing of Drainage Features. The Engineer shall develop layouts for the following: 1. New culverts at existing detention structures. 2. Subsurface drainage at retaining walls. 3. Outfall channels within existing ROW 4. Detention ponds, associated outlet structures and details. F. Coordination. The Engineer shall coordinate with the City, HCFCD. Drainage District No. 4, and TxDOT regarding hydrologic and hydraulic information within the project area. G. Floodplain Cut and Fill. Using water surface elevation profiles determined by the drainage study, the Engineer shall calculate proposed cut and fill volumes below the 100 year flood elevation and coordinate with the drainage authorities. SIGNING. PAVEMENT MARKINGS & SIGNALIZATION (Function Code 162) A. Pavement Marking Layouts. The Engineer shall prepare a striping layout and details per the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4t" Edition. Page 36 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX MISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAYI (Function Code 163) A. Retaining Walls. Retaining walls will be designed for the bridge approaches for the bridge over Clear Creek and shall be concrete block wall except for specialized retaining walls (cantilever, etc.) if required. The Engineer shall provide an overall retaining wall layout, wall layouts, elevations, and typical cross sections of all retaining walls within the project. The specific requirements for each item are as follows: 1. Layout Plan a. Designation of reference line b. Beginning and ending retaining wall stations c. Offset from reference line d. Horizontal curve data e. Total length of wall f. Indicate face of wall g. All wall dimensions and alignment relations (alignment data as necessary) h Soil boring locations Elevation: a. Top of wall elevations b. Existing and finished ground line elevations c. Vertical limits of measurement for payment d. Type, limits and anchorage details of railing (only if Traffic Railing foundation standard is not being used on this project) e. Top and bottom of wall profiles plotted at correct station & elevation. f. Underdrains g. Any soil improvement, if applicable. Sectional View: a. Reinforced volume, if applicable. b. Underdrain location c. Soil improvements. if applicable. Foundation Studies: The Engineer shall coordinate with the TxDOT and BD4 to determine the location of soil borings to be drilled along the retaining wall alignments. The soil borings shall extend a minimum of 35 feet below the footing elevation or deeper as soil conditions warrant. Spacing of soil borings shall not exceed 500 feet. The Engineer shall provide a boring layout for the TxDOT's and BD4's review and comment. The Engineer shall incorporate soil boring data sheets prepared, signed. sealed, and dated by the Geotechnical Engineer. If new borings are taken. the soil boring sheets shall be in accordance with TxDOT Page 37 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX WINCORE software as can be found on the Texas Department of Transportation website. If the TxDOT provides the borings the data shall be compatible with Wincore. The Engineer shall provide design and details for non -MSE walls or standard TxDOT cantilever walls. General Guidelines for Retaining Walls: a. The Engineer shall perform design calculations to check the external stability of the walls including slope stability, bearing, sliding and overturning and detail drawings in accordance with standard requirements of the TxDOT. b. For retaining wall submittals, the Engineer shall look at Bridge Division website for current requirements. B. Traffic Control Plan, Detours & Sequence of Construction. The Engineer shall prepare Traffic Control Plans (TCP) for the project as necessary to construct the trail along any roadway or public access facilities. The Engineer shall show barricades and construction fencing as necessary to protect the public. Continuous, safe access to all properties during all phases of construction is mandatory. The Engineer shall identify and delineate any outstanding ROW parcels. The Engineer shall identify and delineate any temporary construction easements. C. Exhibits for Utility Agreements. The Engineer shall coordinate with the TxDOT regarding utilities. The Engineer shall prepare drawings using English units early in the design phase to be used as exhibits in utility agreements. The Engineer shall show existing utilities. including those in conflict with construction on this project. The Engineer shall prepare plans to avoid utility adjustments, if feasible. The Engineer shall incorporate all requirements identified in the utility agreements. The Engineer shall continue to maintain and update the utility exhibits as necessary. Identify and evaluate utility conflicts with proposed construction. Prepare and submit to the TxDOT, drawings for required utility agreement: 1. An 11 x 17 inch reproducible drawing and title 2. Each utility drawing shall include the following: a. Existing right of way lines b. Existing or proposed roadways c. Proposed storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and water d. Underground utility in plan and profile e. Limits of existing pipe casing f. Owner of utility g. Control of access line Page 38 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX h. Proposed bridge bents and abutments Benchmark data j. Utility company construction contact and phone number k. Typical section view lengthwise along all pipe alignments crossing under the pavement Copies of correspondence with utility companies (if any) Prepare a list of potential conflicts with existing utilities prior to the 30 percent submittal and at every milestone submittal date thereafter. This utility conflict list must include station number, name of utility company and type of facility, the contact person (with address and telephone number), location of conflict (station and offset), proposed highway facility, impacts to storm sewer, roadway, drainage ditch and drilled shaft, expected clearance date, effect on construction and type of adjustment necessary. etc. The Engineer shall maintain and update the conflict list as necessary. After submittal to Design Division, the Engineer shall need to update the utility conflict list again due to ROW certifications. D. Landscaping. The Engineer shall provide the following landscape architectural services for the project. 1. Develop overall vision for the character of the trail corridor, including bridge features. 2. Design amenity aspects for the trail including trail amenities and theming, Such as site furniture, landscape irrigation and graphics. 3. Complete site visits of the proposed trail. 4. Prepare hand sketches and/or enhanced photos to illustrate ideas. This work will be preliminary in nature and does not include construction documents or administration. 5. Develop concepts only for trail heads. 6. Develop planting/seeding concepts and documentation for the corridor A separate proposal for landscaping services is also attached in Attachment E. PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION (Function Code 164) The ENGINEER, in association with the City and TXDOT Project Managers shall be responsible for directing and coordinating all activities associated with the project to comply with TXDOT policies and procedures, and to deliver that work on time. Project Management and Coordination. The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality of and consistency of plans and timely administration of the monthly invoices and progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities. Page 39 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX Design Schedule. The Engineer shall develop a design time schedule for the project (using Microsoft Project) and update the progress of project design throughout project duration. BRIDGE DESIGN (Function Code 170) All bridge structures shall be designed for appropriate loading for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The following structure will be designed: 1. Prefabricated Steel Truss Bridge over Clear Creek A. Bridge Layout. The Engineer shall: Prepare Bridge Layout plans and elevations for all bridge types listed below in accordance with the latest edition of the TxDOT's Load and Resistance Factor Design Bridge Design Manual. Bridge Project Development Manual and Bridge Detailing Manual. Submit the bridge layout to the TxDOT for approval before proceeding to structural detail design. Coordinate with the TxDOT to determine the location of soil borings to be drilled by the Engineer. The Bridge layouts in Plan View shall contain the following information: 1. Reference line, centerline, or profile grade line (bearing, location, and station). 2. Horizontal curve information. 3. Right of way (if required). 4. Skew angle(s) 5. Bearing of centerline 6. Slope for header banks and approach fills 7. Bridge width 8. Limits and type of riprap 9. Proposed features under structure 10. Location of profile grade line 11. North Arrow 12. Location of soil borings (station and offset) 13. Abutment stations and bearings 14. Retaining wall locations, if applicable 15. Stream flow direction (if any) 16. Railing types shown Bridge Layouts in Elevation View should contain the following: 1. Type of foundation 2. Finished grade elevations at beginning and end of bridge 3. Overall length of structure 4. Length, type of spans 5. Type of railing Page 40 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX 6. Existing and proposed ground lines clearly marked 7. Grid elevations and stations 8. Profile grade data 9. Type of riprap 10. Number, size and length of foundations 11. Drawing scale shall be as recommended in the bridge detailing manual. Bridge Layouts in Typical Transverse Section should contain the following: 1. Widths 2. Profile grade line and horizontal control line 3. Cross slope 4. Type of structure The Engineer shall develop bridge layouts and submit a 100% complete bridge layout to the TxDOT at the 30% submittal to provide ample review and design time. The Engineer shall not proceed with detailed design until the preliminary bridge layouts are approved by TxDOT. Page 41 of 41 ATTACHMENT C Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT D ID Task Name 2 3 4 6 6 7 6 9 10 11 -- CITY OF PEARLAND - GREEN TEE TRAILS PROJECT PRELIMINARY Moor Meeting ReId Surveying Geotedracal Study Utility Coordination Site visit wth City of Pearland Design Concept Conference ((CC) Route Analysis Schematic Layout Categorbcal Exclusion - Public Involvement Section 404 Nationwide Permit 12 Initiate Hydrology & Hydraulics Study 13 30% Design - Complete PS&E 14 Prepare 30% Design Plan Streets 15 Open borne public meeting 18 Internal 30% QA/QC / Address Comments / Final Look 17 SubM to T%DOT, HCFCD, D04 and Oty for review and comments 18 60% Design - Complete PSI5E 19 Obtain 30% design comments from City and all agenOes 20 Prepare 60% Design Plan Sheets 21 Prepare cost estimate 22 Prepare speoficatons and costrucbon document 23 Prepare H&H modeling - No Impact Analysts and same to HCFCD & 004 24 Internal 60% QA/QC / Address Comments / Fri! Look 25 Subrrxt to TxDOT, HCFCD, DD4 and Clty for renew and comments 26 90% Design Agency Reviews 27 Obtain 60% design comments from City and all agencies 28_ Prepare 90% Design Plan Sheets 29 Update cost estimate 30 Prepare speohcasons and construction document 31 • Finalize H&H modeling - No Impact Analysis and submit to HCFCD & DD4 321 Internal 90% QA/QC / Address Comments / Final Look 33 Submit to TxDOT, MCFC0 004 and Oty for review and comments 34 100% Design Submittal 35 Obtain 9055 desgn comments from Oty and all ageneses 36 Finalize 10055 Design Plan Sheets 37 Finalize cost estimate 38 Prepare speo6catmns and construction document 39 Internal 10046 QA/QC / Address Comments / Final look 40 Submit to TxDOT, HCFCD, 004 and Oty for review and comments 41 A904147 Approvals 42 Obtain 100% design comments from Oty and a l agencies and Finalize Plans 43 TODOT Approvals 44 Oty of Peadend Approvals 45 ' HCFCD & D04 Approvals as Utility Approvals 47 Advertisement/Bidding 48 Final preparation of construction documents 49 -1 Advertisement / Pre-bid meeting 50 8d Open & Award & Contract Execution 51 Construction - - .62 lite -construction nee8ng & NTP 53 Co stnlctdon (8 months - 20 days/month x 8 months = 160 days) 54 Dose out Master Schedule Baseline 10 04-16 Duwiion Start Finish Predecessors )ctober 1 January 1 Apnl 1 July 1 October 1 January 1 -Agel1 j.AA,_h-10 ,690080 10/9 11/20 1/1 2/12 3/28 5/7 6/18. 7/30 9/10 10/22 12/3 1/14 2/25 : 9/23 j..11/4_1 526 days Mon 10/24/16 Mon 10/29/18 291 days Mon 10/24/16 Mon 12/4/17 1 day Man 10/24/16 Mon 10/24/16 40 days Tue 10/25/16 Mon 12/19/16 3 30 days Tue 10/25/16 Mon 12/5/16 3 290 days Tue 10/25/16 Mon 12/4/17 3 1 day Mon 10/24/16 Mon 10/24/16 1 day Tue 12/20/16 Tue 12/20/16 4 9 days Wed 12/21/16 Mon 1/2/17 8 10 days Tue 1/3/17 Mon 1/16/17 9 200 days Tue 1/17/17 Mon 10/23/17 10 1 day Tue 1/17/17 Tue 1/17/17 10 45 days Tug 1/17/17 Mon 3/20/17 30 days Tue 1/17/17 Mon 2/27/17 10 1 day Tue 2/28/17 Tue 2/28/17 10FS+30 days 5 days Tum 2/28/17 Mon 3/6/17 14 10 days Tue 3/7/17 Mon 3/20/17 16 71 days Tue 3/21/17 TIM 4/27/17 1 day Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 17 40 days Wed 3/22/17 Tue 5/16/17 19 S days Wed 5/17/17 Tue 5/23/17 20 5 days Wed 5/17/17 Tue 5/23/17 20 30 days Wed 5/17/17 Tue 6/27/17 20 5 days Wed 5/17/17 rue 5/23/17 20 21 days Wed 5/24/17 Wed 6/21/17 24 56 days Thu 6/22/17 Thu 9/7/17 1 day Thu 6/22/17 Thu 6/22/17 25 30 days Fn 6/23/17 Thu 8/3/17 27 5 days Fn 8/4/17 Thu 8/10/17 28 S days In 8/4/17 Thu 8/10/17 28 10 days Thu 6/22/17 Wed 7/5/17 25 S days Fn 8/4/17 Thu 8/10/17 28 20 days Fri8/11/17 Thu 9/7/17 32 46 days Fri 9/8/17 Fri 11/10/17 1 day Fn 9/8/17 Fn 9/8/17 33 20 days Mon 9/11/17 Fri 10/6/17 35 5 days Mon 10/9/17 Fri 10/13/17 36 5 days Mon 10/9/17 Fn 10/13/17 36 5 days Mon 10/9/17 Fn 10/13/17 36 20 days Mon 10/16/17 Fn 11/10/17 39 16 days Mon 11/13/17 Mon 12/4/17 1 day Mon 11/13/17 Mon 11/13/17 40 15 days Tue 11/14/17 Mon 12/4/17 42 15 days Tue 11/14/17 Mon 12/4/17 42 15 days Tue 11/14/17 Mon 12/4/17 42 15 days Tue 11/14/17 Mon 12/4/17 42 44 days Tue 12/5/17 Fri 2/2/18 5 days Tue 12/5/17 Mon 12/11/17 46 16 days Tue 12/12/17 Tue 1/2/18 48 23 days Wed 1/3/18 Fn 2/2/18 49 191 days Mon 2/5/18 Mon 10/29/18 1 day Mon 2/5/18 Mort 2/5/18 50 160 days Tue 2/6/18 Mon 9/17/18 52 30 days Tue 9/18/18 Mon 10/29/18 53 0% 0% 7. 0% :0% = 0% �r . 0% 0% O% 0% 0% IS .0% M' 0% 7. E ox 056 p 0% ems 0% 0% 0% = 0% Page 1 Tue 10/4/16 11:11 AM Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT E Contract No. ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (east of Hughes Road and north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) COMPANY Klotz Associates, Inc. (with direct expenses) C.L. Davis & Company Clark Condon Gpoiest Engineering ma errs FEE $282,407.41 $100,943.00 $60,500.00 $29.053.00 S4.181.00 TOTAL $477,084.41 Page 1 of 1 Attachment E Contract No. ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC CONTRACT NUMBER: XXXX PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (east of Pearland Pkwy and north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) BASIC SERVICES TASK Preliminary Desin FC 110` Trail Design (FC 16�, FC 162, FC 163, FC 164) Bride Design (FC 170 Draina e Impac Report(FC 161) SWPFP (FC; 161) ADDITIONAL SERVICES TASK Landscaping - Trail Amenities !Clark Condon` Environmental Document - Categorical Exclusion Environmental - Archeolo/gical Studies (AmaTerra) Desjfln SurveyjC.L. David & Company`` Geo(echnical esign (Geotest Engineering) TOTAL PROJECT TOTALS BASIC SERVICES ADDITIONAL SERVICES DIRECT EXPENSES FEE FEE $14,871.11 $147,148.87 $17,918.48 $23,765.00 $5,533.64 $209,237.10 $60,500.00 $66,200.31 $4,181.00 $100,943.00 $29,053.00 $260,877.31 $209,237.10 $260,877.31 $6,970.00 $477,084.41 1 10/4/2016 Page 1 of 1 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southemmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) SE RATES [SE 11.6486%1 ,JFR 110%1 NTRACT RATE PER HOUR 'nowti0631GI1.Snm.S AFC 1105 DATA COLLECTION TASK DESCRIPTION DATA COLLECTION/REVIEW AND EVALUATE DATA FROM CITY AND AGENCES REVIEW FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION & STUDIES FIELD RECONNAISSANCE CONDUCT FELD RECONNAISSANCE AND PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD VERIFY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DESIGN CONCEPT CONFERENCE (DCC) (INCLUDING COMPLETE DSR FORMA !TRAIL AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CRITERIA IPREIIMINARY COST ESTIMATE IPRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT rOUR&RUBIllialiffMTOTiILs .... ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR (TOTAL LABOR COSTS �+r.K1. DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 16UBTOTAL WC 1101 SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER MANAGER 561.69 548.70 1101 70 580.29 51634 81290 5179.73 5141.89 0 0 4 1 0 4 9 2 6 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 9 5179.73 1141.98 11.61767 I 12.12970 69% I 113% - PROJECT ENGINEER 542.21 569.59 511.18 8122.98 4 DESIGN ER1 SENIOR ENGINEER ENVIRONMENT CARD PLANNER Id OPERATOR 840.56 535 71 $29.22 566.90 158.87 548.17 $10 75 59.46 57 74 5118.23 0104.04 58513 6 6 12 CADD OPERATOR 52760 545.50 5731 580.47 ENVIRON. MANAGER 560.06 599.01 515.91 5174.98 O 0 O 0 O 0 6 6 0 4 0 0 4 1 4 4 0 8 0 1 0 4 4 0 1 0 2 4 I 0 8 0 18 181 8 28 I 38 1 12 1 12 5122.98 1118.23 5104.04 165.13 580.41 53.635.36 1 00.08 1 85.202.00 1 11.021.56 5964.92 24.6% I 0.0% I 38.5% I 9.2% 9.2% SENIOR ENVIRON. PLANNER 151 95 585.64 113.76 5151.35 0 0 D 0 O 0 O 0 0 I 0 4 017408 1 0151.35 50.00 1 10.00 0.0% 1 0.0% ENVIRON. PLANNER N 542.21 66959 51118 512298 0 0 O • 1 O I 5122.98 00.00 0.0% Contract No. ADMIN! TOTAL CLERICAL LABOR HRS. & COSTS 522 73 $37 47 56.02 566 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 10 22 12 12 16 9 52 188 566.22 1 50.00 1 511.171 11 0.0% I Page l d 9 MWftroardE ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION 3ASE RATES 3VERHEAD (.6486%1 OROFIT 110%1 :ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR e�Swloiworwe 1264 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT nwonmental Ootmnentat,on • OA/QC 9e090100114807M/f408s Mitt0ri, Resources Technical Ronne Archenln.Nal aarkermn4 T.chnoal Report water Resources tedln,tal Report SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT DESIGN EIT/ SENIOR CADD ENVIRON SENIOR ENVIRON. ADMIN/ PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER NVIRONMENTAI CADD OPERATOR MANAGER ENVIRON. PLANNER CLERICAL MANAGER PLANNER NI OPERATOR PLANNER N 061.69 548 70 942.21 040.58 !1 335.71 029.22 527.60 560.06 051.95 542.21 522.73 S10170 080.29 569.59 S66 90 1 05887 S48 17 945.50 999.01 585.64 669 59 537.47 516.34 012.90 511 18 510.75 1 59.46 97 74 07 31 915.91 313.76 $11.18 06.02 9179.73 0141.89 912298 5118.23 1 5104.04 385 13 1 580.41 0174.98 9151 35 6122.98 566 22 610100,01,014501.,,,, and uloaou,ro,nformat on 1 Nazardnua Matn,ala 1.rlwral Rcmort I I 1 r ,�III1(4i 1 1 rTaD01 Scene Development Tool 1 1 taDOt Project Renee for eta 1 1 Draft Ct Dmermmatinn tnrm I I I 1 'nal I,flo rmnuOnninrm 1 I I IDfe115uw0,500 DocumentahOn for Cr 007.0,040,(( I I Revised 5.00ortne Documereatnn Inn CE Determination 1I 1 m 1 ialGmMnn. DOwatw mentn lot CE Determination 1 1 Lemont Rmourceldenti6cat.on.Evaluation and Doe...anta.o.Sano-Res 1 I I I' eobPtal Background St040 1 a1 OnWity Studies I 1 I 1lktermn,ne Impacts to Wetet>_ol_lheyrvtedStatee,. including Wettanc I I I Iloodplam Impacts tormwat.. Perm' 1 I5I A(F Na0,. nnwl. Perm I0,sh and Wildlife COord,mtnn An 1 1 I hreatened mtndan00r.d ...nes 1 1 ..xal Aaaetam.nt of Hazerdous Meterah Imoac. 1 I I 6 4 4 8 4 4 2 2 6 24 24 I 24 16 8 8 12 12 12 2 8 2 8 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 8 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 8 8 j 2 2 2 4 4 4 COntraCt No. TOTAL LABOR MRS. & COSTS 1.4 16 20 16 26 8 14 4 7 16 42 8 19 4 II I o 1 0 1 0 id'Ili88k�:'rQTJrti ..,. •.. -0 1 n .ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR 179.73 14158 1 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 1 $0.00 1 $0 00 1 -m DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 1 0.0% 1 0.0% IOAfWAr0c910NC0NT80LaIFC1Y6 1 1 1 4 4 24 2 1 8 120 122.98 118.23 104.04 50.00 $0.00 1 812.484 80 0.0% 0.0% 1 22.6% 1 1 mmils 1 8 4 1 16 1 24 2 1 / 1 I 1 1 1 . 1 1 4 1 16 1 30 1 39 1 163 1 128 1 18 99 -Ids -.. 1. - - 18 85.13 80.41 174 98 1 151 55 122.98 1 RR 22 52.553.90 1 82.733.94 1 $6.824.22 1 524.670.05 1 315.741.44 1 51 191.96 5.6% 1 6.4% 1 7.3% 1 30.6% 24.1% 1 3.4% 1 1 1 1 34 1 20 1_ 532 832 866200.31 Page 2 of 9 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION (BASE RATES (OVERHEAD 11.6486%1 0ROFR//:10%J SON (RACT RATE PER HOUR DESIGN REVEW CONFERENCES 130%.60% 90% FNAL DESIGN MEETINGS( PRF! IMINARY GEOMETRIC PROJECT LAYOUT TRAIL DESIGN PARKING LAYOUT DESIGN PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS DESIGN CROSS SECTIONS / GEOPAK EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS PLAN PREPARATION WITH MISC DRAWINGS TRAIL PLAN AND PROFILE (SCALE H 1,101T V 1-• 10'( :ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR TOTAL LABOR COSTS K DISTRIBUTOR OF STAFFING SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT DESIGN PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER 061.69 548.70 042.21 540.58 510170 581.26 369.59 066.90 016.34 512.90 01118 010.75 0179 73 5141.89 5122.98 0118.23 4 12 4 0 12 4 8 28 8 I 4 8 I 2 4 0 I 8 18 1 8 8 2 1 8 16 in 22 1 38 104 0 22 1 38 _ 00L 179 73 1 141.98 122.98 1 118.23 13.954.06 1 05.39524 1 012.789,92 1 50.00 40% 1 70% 1 19.1% 1 0.0% 1 1 1 ERI NVIRONMENTA PLANNER I8 535.71 058.87 59.46 0104.04 24 24 16 48 20 32 5811- 10404 017478.72 30.9% SENIOR CADD ENVIRON CPDD OPERATOR MANAGER OPERATOR 029.22 077.60 560.06 04817 1 045.50 585.01 S7 74 37.31 015.91 385 13 080.41 5174.98 SENIOR ENVIRON PLANNER 051 05 055.64 513 76 0151.35 O 0 32 0 52 n 1 18 1 n 1 0 16 1 0 0 O 1 0 0 32 1 0 1 64 0 0 1 0 712 0 1 0 1 o 85.13 1 80.41 11 1�1 151.35 518047.56 1 00 na 1 $0.00 50.00 39.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0.0% I 1 ENVIRON PLANNER S42 21 S69 59 011 18 1122.98 0 0 0 122.98 1 s000 1 00% 0.0% Contract No. ADMIN/ TOTAL CLERICAL LABOR HRS a COSTS 522 73 537.47 56.02 566.22 O 16 O 72 O 116 O 97 O 26 0 72 O 1 68 O 1 122 O 1 544 1 .. ,lw.• d18s.,., 1 613.22 80.00 1 537.189.80 1 Page 3 of 9 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES. INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ. GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS. southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the Intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION SASE RATES OVERHEAD 116486%1 >ROFO 110;61 :ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT DESIGN EIT 1 SENIOR CADD ENVIRON SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER NVIRONMENTA CADD OPERATOR MANAGER ENVIRON. MANAGER PLANNER 111 OPERATOR PLANNER 561 69 548.70 542.21 540.58 535.71 529 22 527 60 560.(6 551 95 5101.70 580.29 S69.59 066.90 558.87 548.17 545.50 099.01 585 64 516.34 012.90 S11 18 510.75 59 46 57.74 57 31 015 91 513 76 5179 73 5141.89 5122.98 5118.23 5104.04 585.13 580.41 5174.98 5151.35 DRAINAGE (FC7611 ' iYDRAULIC DRAINAGE STUDY AND DOCUMENTATION DATA COLLECTION 0 DRAINAGE REPORT 7 UPOATF FXISTING 6100FI S 0 OFVFI OP EXISTING FLOOD PROFILES 0 DEVELOP PROPOSED MODELS 2 DEVELOP PROPOSED FLOOD PROFB FS 0 OFTFRMINF FII 1 IN TRF 0 OOOPI AIN C41 0111 ATIONS IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CLEAR CREEK 2 COORDINATION 1 FLOODPLAIN GUT AND FILL 0 1 6 STORM SEINER DESIGN HYDROLOGIC CALCS / DRAINAGE AREA MAPS 1 HYDRAULIC DATA SHEETS (1 BRIDGE AND ONE CUI VFRT1 1 CULVERT LAYOUTS AND DESIGN 0 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURAL DETAILS 0 2 1SW3P 'EROSION CONTROL PLAN (STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN STANDARDS !STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SUMMARIES 1 0 LOURS SUB -TOTALS 10. 58 SF RATES 169 ''OVERHEAD 011104 'PROFIT 517 27 'CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR 17973 (TTA( 1 ARDR COSTS S1 79716 DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING 2.3% 1 1 'SUBTOTAL (FC 1811 0 A 4 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 8 12 12 4 8 2 8 40 1 64 4 4 16 :12 0 16 74 0 6 10 10 6 14 6 6 10 n 4 76 n A 0 1 8 O 24 O 46 0 0 0 0 4 4 8 12 36 0 n 8 12 8 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENVIRON PLANNER N 54221 569.59 511 18 5122 98 0 0 0 0 0 ADAM/ CLERICAL S22 73 537 47 56.02 566.22 0 Contract No. TOTAL LABOR HRS 6 COSTS 10 37 22 14 24 14 17 36 11 1R 200 1 1 1 12 40 174 36 7 7 50 428 047.576.66 147.576.66 O 0 O 0 O 0 10 n 1 n 1 O 1 14 ( 6 2 1 2 2 1 2 I 2 2 n 0 O a O 0 O 12 .. 546 70 542.21 ... 540 5A 587 66 01364 141 98 Stn 272 56 16 8% 075.98 011 82 122 98 017 29600 234% 1 18 1 10 1 10 1 0 1 142 1L,....4s..,. S a 1 535.71 1S2922 1 027.60 1 560.06 073 04 1 564.28 1 052.60 549.68 1 5108 11 511 36 1 010.00 0818 0773 1 516.82 118 73 1 104.04 855.13 80.41 1 174.98 SO 00 1 014.773.68 04.256.50 03.698.86 1 50 00 00% 1 33.2% 117% 1n794 1 00% 0 1 0 1 0 501.95 1 542.21 1 52273 593 51 514.55 151.35 50 00 nnx 575 96 511 82 12298 6000 00% 840 41 56 36 66 77 SS25 76 1 99. Paye 4 of 9 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME' KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION LSE RATES 'OVFRHFAO (1 84881.1 OFIT 10%1 'ONT ACT RATE PER HOUR war. moutIC14 a stoma. (mu) .. MARKING LAYOUT 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNS ''OURS SUB -TOTALS 'CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR ITOTAL L6000 COSTS I% DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFNG WeAL WC ISM SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER 561.69 548.70 542.21 5101 70 580 29 569 59 S16.34 512.90 51118 5179.73 6141 89 S122.98 DESIGN ENGINEER 540.58 S66 90 510 75 5118 23 EIT / SENIOR :NVIRONMENT CADD PLANNER III OPERATOR S35 71 529.22 55807 54817 59.46 57 74 5104 04 585.13 CADD OPERATOR 527.60 S4550 5731 58041 1 2 4 0 2 4 1 4 8 1 4 8 179 73 141.98 122.98 5179 73 5567 92 S98304 27% 10.8% 716%. 178.23 50.00 00% 4 12 12 104.04 51148.48 37 a 12 12 85.13 51.021.56 37.4% 0 0 0 80.41 50.00 00% ENVIRON MANAGER 560.06 09901 515.91 5174.98 SENIOR ENVIRON. PLANNER 551 95 585 64 513 76 5151 35 ENVIRON. PLANNER N 54221 56459 511 18 512298 ADMIN/ CLERICAL 522 73 537 47 56.02 566 22 Contract No. TOTAL LABOR HRS 8 COSTS 0 D 0 0 174.98 50.00 00% 0 151 35 50.00 00% 122 98 60.00 00% 0 66 22 SO DO 1 00 23 14 37 37 54.001.53 54.001.53 Page 5 of 9 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS' southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION (BASE RATES IOVERHEAD 116486%7 IPROFIT (10%1 ICONTFtACT RATE PER HOUR (Yt191'BlANEO11aMGADWAYI RC 1W1 ITRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. DETOURS & SEQUENCE OF CONSTR TCP GENERAL NOTES AND PHASING DESCRIPTION (RETAINING WALLS IF REQUIRED) RETAINING WALL P&P SHEETS 11' =401 RETAINING WALL MSE WALL DETAILS MISCELLANEOUS DRAFTING / STANDARDS PROJECT LAYOUT SHEETS MISCELLANEOUS ROADWAY DETAILS STANDARD SHEETS (COMPUTE AND TABULATE QUANTITIES SUMMARY OF TRAIL QUANTITIES GENERAL NOTES. SPECIFICATIONS AND PROVISIONS CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION TIME. DETERMINATION (CONTRACT RATE PER HOUR (TOTAL LABOR COSTS 17. DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING IsuardaraM& SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER 061.69 1101 70 616.34 5179 73 0 0 2 SENIOR ENGINEER 548 70 000 29 512.90 0141 89 2 2 8 4 12 O 2 O 4 O 1 2 11 2 1 2 2 2 8 6 10 179.73 51.797 30 4.0% 20 33 141.98 04.685.34 130°: PROJECT ENGINEER 54771 569.59 011 18 5722 98 8 8 8 4 12 4 18 8 16 12 72 48 74 122.98 59.100.52 292% DESIGN ENGINEER 14058 566.90 610.75 0118 23 0 0 0 EIT/ :NVIRONMENTA PLANNER 111 635 77 S58 87 59.46 0104.04 SENIOR CADD OPERATOR 079 77 148.17 67 74 585 13 CADD ENVIRON. SENIOR ENVIRON. ADMIN/ OPERATOR MANAGER ENVIRON. PLANNER CLERICAL PLANNER N 577.60 060.06 651 95 047,21 527 73 545.50 099.01 085.64 569.59 537 47 57.31 015.91 013 76 011 18 06.02 58041 0174.98 0151 35 0122 98 566 22 16 8 8 8 8 0 24 16 8 0 0 1 4 0 ( 0 I 0 0 18 16 24 0 8 4 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 4 4 0 O 64 28 28 0 I0 0 11823 _ ,_ �_ +_ +1 174.98 15135 00.00 56.658.56 32.383.64 52.251.48 50.00 90.00 0.0% 25.3% 111% 171% 0.055 0.0% 16 0 0 0 Contract No. & COSTS TOTAL LABOR HRS ( 28 28 49 25 74 ( 18 0 1 27 0 18 57 O 0 28 O ) 22 O 16 ) 134 0 122 98 1 66.22 80.00 01.059.52 1 $27939.39 0.0% ) 6.3% 1 ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC ) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the Intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION ASE RATES VERHEAD (1 6486%1 eOFR (10 DNTRACT RATE PER HOUR Folififootor 8111 811 0 IW/! WG 184) PROJECT MANAGEMENT 8 COORDINATION (9 MONTHS) PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 19 MONTHS) 1 DESIGN COORONATK)N MFFTINGS 19 MONTHS) 1 PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE(UPDATEO MONTHLY) S SUB•TOT*LS ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR ITOTAI 1AROR COSTS I% DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING TOTAL (FC 1841 SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER MANAGER 561.69 548,70 0101 70 580.29 116.34 117 9n 117973 1141.89 40 0 30 0 30 0 n 0 100 0 100 0 179.73 141 98 517 973 08 10 00 34 1% 0.0% PROJECT ENGINEER 542.21 569.59 511 18 5122.98 40 30 40 40 190 150 12298 918.447.00 51276 DESIGN ENGINEER 54058 566.90 510.75 5118.23 0 0 0 n 0 118.23 50 00 0.096 E1T( SENIOR NVIRONMENT CADD PLANNER III OPERATOR 535.71 529.22 558.87 ) 54817 69.46 ( 5774 8104.04 ( 085.13 CADD OPERATOR 127.60 545.50 S731 880.41 ENVIRON. MANAGER 560.06 099.01 515.91 5174.98 SENIOR ENVIRON PLANNER 551 95 585.64 01378 1151 35 ENVIRON PLANNER N 54221 069.59 511 18 5122.98 ADMIN/ CLERICAL 522.73 037.47 56.02 08622 Contras No TOTAL LABOR HRS 8 COSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 94 a 0 0 104.04 50 00 0.0% 0 0 0 8513 1000 0.0% 0 0 a 0 8041 50 00 0.0% 0 0 (74.98 6000 151 35 50.00 Page 7 a: 9 0 0 0 O 127 98 00 50 0 0% 14 74 1 15 85 1 0 40 1 43 293 1 43 293 - 66 72 5784746 139 287.48 1 14.71 1 1 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL / 0912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the Intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION IBASE RATES (OVERHEAD 11.6486%1 IPROFIT 10% ICONTRACT )ATE PER HOUR 8q�/.�J -1701 G LAE YOUTS I1 STRUCTUREI I,SUMMARV OF BRIDGE OUANTITIESJBRG SEAT ELEVATIONS 11 STRUCTUREI IABUTMENT DFTAn S 11 STRUCTUREI 4AISCELLANEOUs DETAILS FOR PREFABRICATED BRIDGES /1 STRIlCTLJRF1 5118 -TOTALS ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR OTAL LABOR COSTS DISTRIBUTION OF STAFFING DTAL FC 1701 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER 56169 5101 70 516.38 5179 73 2 0 1 4 4 179.73 5718.92 24 4 SENIOR ENGINEER 548 70 580.29 51290 5141 89 2 12 30 141.98 54.259.40 18 3% PROJECT ENGINEER Sd2.21 569.59 511 18 5122.98 10 0 14 8 32 122.98 53.935.36 19 59: DESIGN EIT/ SENIOR ENGINEER INVIRONMENTA CARD PLANNER III OPERATOR 540.58 535.71 S29.22 566 90 S58 87 548 77 310.75 3946 5774 8118.23 S104.04 58513 118.23 5000 00!6 10 4 20 8 47 a't` 104 06 S4 069 68 25 6'x. 12 6 2R 2s CADD OPERATOR 827.60 545.50 S7.31 580.41 12 10 28 28 85.13 8041 5238364 5225148 171'4 171 ENVRON. SENIOR ENVRON. ADMINI MANAGER ENVRON. PLANNER CLERICAL PLANNER IV 560.06 551 95 S47.21 522 73 599.01 585.64 569.59 537 47 S15.91 513 76 S11 18 56.02 5174.98 5151 35 5122 98 566 22 774.98 50.00 0 0,x. 151 35 50 00 n 0%. 0 122 98 50 00 00Y 0 66.22 SO 00 0 0%: Contract No. TOTAL LABOR HRS. 6 COSTS 54 12 63 35 164 fa 517.918.48 047.818/8.. _. Page 8 of 9 Attachment E ATTACHMENT E FEE SCHEDULE (KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.) METHOD OF PAYMENT: PRIME PROVIDER NAME: KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME / CSJ: GREEN TEE TERRACE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL 10912-31-291 LIMITS: southernmost end of Riverstone Ranch (north of Clear Creek) crossing over to the south of Clear Creek near the curved road of Pearland Parkway extending southward to Broadway Street (FM 518) (approximately 1000 ft east of the Intersection of Broadway Street (FM 518) and Pearland Parkway) TASK DESCRIPTION SASE RATES iVERHEAD 11 64863,7 020FIT 110x1 :ONTRACT RATE PER HOUR DESCRPTOr. 20U7E AND DESIGN STUDES (PC: ENVRONMENTAL STUDESAIO PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (FC :201 2OADWAY DESIGN CONTROLS IPC 1601 312AINAGE (PC 161) SIGNING. PVA4T. MARK. .6 SIGNALS IFC162( 4ISCELLANEOUS (ROADWAY) IFC 1631 41WAGRG CONTRACTED PER SERVICES a SURVEY CONTRACTS (PC 1841 GF DESIGN (FC 172 1IIOBTOTAL LABOR EXPENses SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT DESIGN EIT , SENIOR CAOD ENVIRON . SENIOR ENVIRON PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINEER i7NGINEER :NVIRONMENTA CARD 11PERATOIt MANAGER f NVIRON PLANNER MANAGER PLANNER B OPERATOR P1 ANNER N S61 59 048 70 542 21 700 50 135 71 579 72 027.60 960.06 001 95 $42 21 5101.70 590 79 569.59 066 90 $58 87 54.17 545 57 099.01 585 64 $69 59 01634 51200 51118 51075 19.46 S774 0737 515.91 01376 01118 01747+. ,.77no S122.98 911823 510404 565.13 58041 517498 515135 012798 9 0 22 10 10 100 156 15 0 38 72 33 0 30 192 12 0 104 100 8 illp exer 1,01 3.000 5 0.575 11I9nco0es BAN N 12 X 111 2 000 S 0 10 elotocooes SOW 111 X 171 800 5 0.15 1 'SolOoopos COOo (A 1/7 x 111 800 5 01151 ?9OI0c0966 Coer 111 X 171 700 ✓1' 1.75 IPS Reser (Pard 24 5 3000 1 147ar0005 MaMrbt Database Soros 1 4,...,..41/1211mac 4.0once Anne es 1 3 100.00 1 tourer Sereces 13eheresl 4 S 35.00 rwra Notice IdIls 1&W m Bo� e boo s (Color on Boro bon 260 • 600 60 ts 070 1.50 f 0.45 SUBTOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES 111,cONTRACTS. : L Uav75 8 Cf an 1 - Survo9� 3 Services lark CondOR - L �dt&,,+ SOWIces 3eotest E7gIne0rly3`� A ch InveSt10atlOn & Matcnals Test1nn krnat27rA - Arched(cal ServICes jUMM CT SUB.' �I axy TOTAL COSTS FOR PRIME ONLY 3275.437 411 NON -SALARY 90THER DIRECT EXPENSE81 FOR PRIM CORY 58.970 001 SUBCONTRACTS ANNAN labor cogs and pct seNnsesl' 5194.877 001 GRAND TOTA(J $S77JI84.1011 74 150 1 37 500 1 ADMIW CLERICAL 522 73 037 47 08 02 066 22 TOTAL MN BY FC 50 12 12 0 0 0 130 120 30 34 39 163 128 637 168 212 0 0 0 0 664 142 50 46 0 0 428 11 12 0 0 0 37 64 28 28 0 1 0 0 703 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 793 42 78 78 0 0 0 164 598 372 148 39 1 183 126 2381 Mrs 200 5 2.00 Is Contract No. TOTAL LABOR HRS 8 COSTS TOTAL COSTS BY FC 14 871 11 66 200 11 57665 50 47.576 66 4 001 51 27 816 16 10 767 46 7 918 48 5275.437.41 1.725 00 700 00 120 00 51000 1 225 00 400 00 720 00 800 00 100 00 21000 1S 18750 1 1 5 750 00 I I S 72 50 1 1 1 56.970.00 100 943 00 60500 00 29 053 DO 54181 00 5194.677.00 Contract Number XXX RPS KLOTZ ASSOCIATES, INC PS&E and ENVIORNMENTAL Contract Number XXX SURVEYING C.L. DAVIS & COMPANY C. L. DAVIS & COMPANY LAND SURVEYING 1500 Winding Way Friendswood, Texas 77546 281.482.9490 FAX 281.482.1294 - FIRM NO. 10082000 cldavis(a�cldaviscomnanv.com June 15, 2016 REVISED: July 5, 2016 RPS Klotz Associates Mr. Brad R. Brown, P.E. Vice President 1160 Dairy Ashford, Suite 500 Houston, Texas 77709 Re: City of Pearland Project - Green Tee Terrace Hike and Bike Trail - Between Hughes Road and F.M. 518 Proposal No. 2016-096 (RI) Dear Mr. Brown: Our proposal for land surveying services for the above referenced project is as follows: ("This Proposal does not include T\DOT Data Sheet as called out in Function Code 150) PHASE 1 - ESTABLISHING PRIMARY CONTROL, EXISTING BOUNDARY LINES AND TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTILITY INVESTIGATION SURVEY ON SECTION 1. Establish Horizontal Control based on North American Datum 1983, Texas South Central Zone 4204 and Vertical Control based on North American Vertical Datum 1988, 2001 Adjustment (Harris County Floodplain Reference Marks will be utilized to establish control) Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 2 hours x 200 5400.00 R.P.L.S. - 6 hours 150 5900.00 CAD - 8 hours x I10 5880.00 Three-man field crew -12 hours x 183 52,196.00 Data Collector - 12 hours x 40 5480.00 Clerical - 0 hours x 80 50.00 Subtotal 54,856.00 2. SEGMENT 1: Establish existing boundary, along easterly side (Harris County side) of Clear Creek from south corner of Highland Glen Subdivision to north end of Clear Creek Park Subdivision Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal -6 hours x 200 S1,200.00 R.P.L.S - 12 hours x 150 51,800.00 CAD -12 hours x 110 51,320.00 Three-man field crew -16 hours x 183 52,928.00 Data Collector - 16 hours x 40 5640.00 Clerical - 4 hours x 80 5320.00 Subtotal 58,208.00 514 rVeivi tke C rent State of Texxs for eler ZS' ijears 2016-096 (R1 )CoP - Green Tee Terrace Hike & Bike Trail Proposal No. 2016-096 (RI) Page 2 3. SEGMENT 1: Topographic and Utility investigation Survey along easterly side (Harris County side) of Clear Creek from south corner of Highland Glen Subdivision to north end of Clear Creek Park Subdivision (Fee based on 100' cross- sections and 50' beyond top bank or to tree line) (Approximately 2,800') (East side of Creek only) Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 4 hours x 200 5800.00 R.P.L.S. - 4 hours 150 5600.00 CAD - 32 hours 110 53,520.00 Three-man field crew - 32 hours x 183 55,856.00 Data Collector -32 hours x 40 51,280.00 Clerical - 2 hoursx 80 5160.00 Subtotal 512,216.00 4. SEGMENT 2: Establish existing boundary along southwesterly side (Brazoria County side) of Clear Creek from north end of Clear Creek Park Subdivision to southeasterly corner of Clear Creek Park Subdivision (Approximately 3,400') Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 6 hours x 200 51,200.00 R.P.L.S. - 16 hours 150 52,400.00 CAD-16hours x110 51,760.00 Three-man field crew - 24 hours x 183 54,392.00 Data Collector - 24 hours x 40 5960.00 Clerical - 4 hours x 80 5320.00 Subtotal til 1,032.00 5. SEGMENT 2: "Topographic and Utility Investigation Survey along southwesterly side (Brazoria Count, side) of Clear Creek from north end of Clear Creek Park Subdivision to southeasterly corner of Clear Creek Park Subdivision (Fee based on 100' cross- sections and 50' beyond top bank or to tree line) (Approximately 3,400') Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 4 hours x 200 5800.00 R.P.L.S. - 4 hours 150 5600.00 CAD - 40 hours 110 54,400.00 Three-man field crew - 45 hours x 183 58,235.00 Data Collector - 45 hours x 40 51,800.00 Clerical - 2 hours 80 5160.00 Subtotal 515,995. 00 6. SEGMENT 3 & 4: Establish existing boundary along Drainage Corridor from Province Village Drive to F.M. 518 Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 2 hours x 200 5400.00 R.P.L.S. - 4 hours 150 5600.00 CAD - 16 hours 110 51,760.00 Three-man Held crew -10 hours x 183 51,830.00 Data Collector -10 hours x 40 5400.00 Clerical - 2 hours 80 5160.00 Subtotal 55,150.00 5t/i rUeiti tke C ret Mate of Texas for viler -1-1.Y i4exr5 2016-096 (R1) CoP - Green Tee Terrace Hike & Dike Trail Proposal No. 2016-096 (R1) Page 3 7. SEGMENT 3 & 4: Topographic and Utility Investigation Survey along Drainage Corridor from Province Village Drive 10 F.M. 518 (Approximately 1,500') Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 2 hours x 200 5400.00 R.P. L.S. - 4 hours x /50 5600.00 CAD - 32 hours x /10 53,520.00 Three-man field crew - 20 hours x 183 53,660.00 Data Collector - 20 hours x 40 5800.00 Clerical - 4 hours x 80 $320.00 Subtotal 59,300.00 8. Establish Boundary on strip from Pearland Parkway to Clear Creek for proposed Parking Lot (Approximately 1,000') Fee lased on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 2 hours x 200 5400.00 R.P.L.S. - 6 hours 150 5900.00 CAD - 8 hours x 110 5880.00 Three-man field crew - 8 hours x 183 51,464.00 Data Collector - 8 hours x 40 5320.00 Clerical - 2 hours x 80 5160.00 Subtotal 54,124.00 9. Topographic and Utility Investigation Survey on strip from Pearland Parkway to Clear Creek for proposed Parking Lot (Approximately 1,000') Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 2 hours x 200 5400.00 R. P. L.S. - 1 hours x 150 5300.00 CAD - 20 hours x 110 52,200.00 Three-man field crew - 12 hours x 183 52,196.00 Data Collector - 12 hours x 40 5480.00 Clerical - 2 hours x 80 5160.00 Subtotal 55, 736.00 SUBTOTAL OF PHASE 1 $76,617.00 PHASE 2 - CORE BORES AND WETLAND AREAS /0. Calculate coordinates on Core Bores bused on information furnished this office by Project Engineering and Field Stake Core Bores (Fee based on 7 Core Bores) Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 2 hours x 200 5400.00 R. P.L.S. - 0 hours x 150 50.00 CAD - 6 hours x 110 5660.00 Three-man field crew - /0 hours x 183 51,830.00 Data Collector - 10 hours x 40 5400.00 Clerical - 2 hours x 80 $160.00 Subtotal 53,450.00 14rtietiini tke 9ret Stxteo f TexXS for over ,ZY 2016-096 (RI ) CoP - Green Tee Terrace Hike & Bike Trail Proposal No. 2016-096 (R1) Page 4 11. Locate Welland staked by others on entire project and prepare evhibits delineating Wetland Areas (tee is approximate.) (Locution of 0 etland , I rens unknown at this time) (DELETi:D) Fee based on thefilluwing levels of of f;rtc: Principal - 0 hours .v 200 50.011 R.P.L.S. - 0 hours .• 150 50.00 CID-0hours .v1/t/ 50.00 Three -gran field crew - 0lrours .v 183 SO.00 Data Collector - 0 hours x 40 50.00 Clerical - 0 hours .v 80 5200 Subtotal S0.0I1 SUBTOTAL OF PHASE 2 $3,450.00 PHASE 3 - PARCEL PLATS FOR PROPOSED EASEMENTS 12. Preparation of Parcel Plats for proposed easements crossing through tracts along easterly side of Clear Creek from southerly corner of Enclave at Highland Glen to proposed Bridge Crossing Harris County (Estimate 3 parcels) (This task will be required if Harris County Flood Control and Land Owner requires an Easement) Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 3 hours x 200 5600.00 R.P.L.S - 24 hours x 150 $3,600.00 CAD - 24 hours x 110 $2,640.00 Three-man field crew -12 hours x 183 $2,196.00 Data Collector - 12 hours x 40 5480.00 Clerical - 6 hours x 80 5480.00 SUBTOTAL OF PHASE 3 $9,996.00 PHASE 4 - COORDINATION 13. Coordinate project with Design Team, City of Pearland and TxDOT Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal - 16 hours x 200 53,200.00 R.P.L.S. - 16 hours x /50 52,400.00 CAD - 0 hours x 110 50.00 Three-man field crew - 0 hours x 183 50.00 Data Collector - 0 hours x 40 50.00 Clerical - 0 hours x 80 $0.00 SUBTOTAL OF PHASE 4 $5,600.00 PHASE 5 - ABSTRACTING /4. Obtain vesting deeds and easements on project alignment (Task will be completed by Charter Title Company) SUBTOTAL OF PHASE 5 $1,200.00 SurUe�ivc9 tke ret State of Texas for oiler ,ZY �ea-rs 2016-096 (R1) CoP - Green Tee Terrace Hike & Bike Trail Proposal No. 2016-096 (RI) Page 5 PHASE 6 - HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL SHEETS 15. Preparation of Horizontal and Vertical Control Sheets Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal — 4 hours x 200 $800.00 R.P.L.S. — 16 /tours x 150 $2,400.00 CAD — 8 hours x 110 $880.00 Three-man field crew — 0 hours x 183 $0.00 Data Collector — 0 hours x 40 $0.00 Clerical — 0 /tours x 80 $0.00 Subtotal $4,080.00 /6. Mahe Control /ta.se Linc (Fee includes beginning, end, points qt. curvature and points at 500' intervals along tangent segments) (DELETED) Fee based on the following levels of efforts: Principal — 0 /tours .r• 200 S0.00 R.P.1..S. — 0 hours x 150 SO.00 GID — 0 hours x 110 Sll.011 Three-man .field crew —11 hours .v 183 50.01) Data Collector — 0 hours .v 40 S0.00 Clerical — 0 hours .v 811 50.011 Sttbtatal... '50.00 SUBTOTAL OF PHASE 6 $4,080.00 Total Amount of Proposal $100,943.00 Any changes or revisions in the scope of the project after authorization to proceed will be billed on an hourly basis as described below: • Principal $200.00 • Registered Professional Land Surveyor (RPLS) $150.00 • Technical/CAD $110.00 • Three-man field crew $183.00 • Data Collector $40.00 • Clerical $80.00 All surveying services are under the jurisdiction of the Texas Board of Land Surveying: 7701 North Lamar, Suite 400; Austin, Texas 78752; phone number: 512-452-9427. Any complaints about surveying services should be sent to the above address to the attention of Complaints Officer of the Board. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to working with you. Sincerely, C. L. Davis, R.P.L.S. SurUeiiin9 tke 9ret State of Texas for oVer,ZY i7eNrs 2016-096 (R1) CoP - Green Tee Terrace Hike & Bike Trail Contract Number XXX LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CLARK CONDON January 13. 2014 Revised July 29, 2015 Revised September 24, 2015 Revised October 12, 2015 Revised June 20, 2016 Mr. Brad Brown Klotz Associates 1160 Dairy Ashford. Suite 500 Houston, TX 77079 Re: Green Tee Terrace Trail Dear Brad CLARK CONDON 10401 STELLA LINK ROAD HOUSTON, TEXAS 77025 713.871.1414 713.871.0888 CLARKCONDON.COM We are pleased to make this proposal for landscape architectural services associated with the Green Tee Terrace Trail in Pearland. Texas. For the purposes of this proposal. you will be referred to as the Client and Clark Condon Associates, Inc. as the Landscape Architect. SCOPE OF WORK- The Landscape Architect will provide landscape architectural services for Green Tee Terrace Trail as follows: 1. The Landscape Architect will design amenity aspects for the entire length of trail (approximately 9,800 LF) and parking lot— including trail amenities and theming, such as site furniture, planting and graphics. Amenities will be at select locations along the trail. We will meet City of Pearland landscape ordinance requirements. 2. The Landscape Architect will work in support of engineer on trail alignment. This will include time walking/touring the proposed trail alignment. Deliverables will be hand sketches or enhanced photos to illustrate ideas. Trail documentation by others. 3. The Landscape Architect will develop trail signage documents based on previously designed trail sign prototypes. 4. Attend 1 public stakeholder meeting. SCOPE AREA – 1. Area includes 4,000 LF north of the proposed bridge location. Amenities only – trail by others. 2. Approximately 3, 900 LF of proposed trail south of the pedestrian bridge - Trail and amenities. 3. Approximately 600 LF of existing trail to Province Village Drive – Amenities only. Trail is existing. 4. Approximately 1,300 LF of proposed trail and amenities from Province Village Drive to FM 518. Total trail length is approximately 9,800 LF. PRELIMINARY DESIGN - The Landscape Architect will prepare Preliminary Design of the site to meet approval of the Client. The plans will indicate general concepts responding to site conditions. the program and budget. Preliminary Design services shall include the following: 1 Visit the site to become familiar with the existing features and the surrounding area. 2. Attend 1 scheduled meeting of Client and/or authorized representatives to review design concepts. 3. Develop an overall concept plan for the site as outlined above under scope. 4. Prepare a budgetary construction cost estimate based upon the concept. 5. Provide input to and assist other consultants as needed. CLARK CONDON DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - Design Development will be initiated after the Client's approval of the Preliminary Design. During this phase, the Landscape Architect will refine the design and budgets. Design Development plans will depict actual materials, sizes and locations of all elements. Services to be provided in this phase include: 1. Materials selection for all elements. 2 Cost estimates based on Design Development drawings. 3 Coordination with project team. 4. Attendance at Client meetings. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS • The Construction Documents phase will be initiated after the Client's approval of Design Development. The Landscape Architect will prepare all Construction Documents and Technical Specifications for bidding and installation of the landscape architectural components. Services to be provided in this phase include 1. Site plans at 1" = 20' or appropriate scale indicating all items approved during Design Development. 2. Layout plans indicating location of proposed amenity elements. 3. Planting plans including all selections for all locations. 4. Details for all landscape materials with specifications as required for proper construction. installation or finishing of all landscape components. 5. Issue signed and sealed permit set and assist as necessary to prepare the Project's permit. 6. Trail signage documents. 7. Final construction cost estimate to include unit costs at current construction dollars. 8. Specifications in MasterSpec Format. 9 Revise the construction documents in a closing addendum, which incorporates any revisions and cost saving items agreed to during the bidding phase. BIDDING - Not included in this scope. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION - Not included in this scope. FEE - The total fee for this project is a lump sum based upon the estimated time for professional services as outlined below, plus reimbursable expenses. Fee is based on providing 1 bid package. Multiple packages will be considered additional services. Preliminary Design Design Development Construction Documents Graphics & Signage TOTAL $7,500.00 $8.000.00 $24,000.00 $16.000.00 $55,500.00 We consider Additional Services to include changes made after a phase of work has been accepted and we have been authorized by the Client to proceed to the next phase. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES - The Client shall pay the Landscape Architect for the cost of out of town travel expenses, mileage, printing and other directly related costs. All expenses will be billed at cost plus 15%. CLARK CONDON EXTRA SERVICES - Additional services, if requested by the Client, will be considered as extra services and be billed hourly at the rates listed below. Principal/Owner $350.00/hour Principal $225.00/hour Senior Associate $150.00/hour Project Manager $110.00/hour Assistant Project Manager $100.00/hour Project Staff $90.00/hour Administrative $75.00/hour EXCLUSIONS TO THE CONTRACT 1. Surveying services. 2. Site engineering and utility base information. 3. Tree survey. 4. TDLR review and submittals. 5. Bridge design and documentation. 6. Irrigation design and documentation. 7. Road crossings. JURISDICTION - The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners has jurisdiction over complaints regarding the professional practices of persons registered as landscape architects in Texas. The Board may be reached at the following address. Texas Board of Architectural Examiners P.O. Box 12337 Austin, TX 78711-2337 (512) 305-9000 - Phone / (512) 305-8900 Fax BILLING - Billing shall be monthly based on the portion of the total estimated fee. Invoices shall be due upon receipt. Clark Condon Associates. Inc. reserves the right to charge the amount of interest allowable under the current laws of the State of Texas on any invoices not paid within thirty (30) days. TERMINATION - If the Client should decide to terminate this Agreement. he shall give Clark Condon Associates, Inc. seven (7) days written notice and shall pay for all services rendered to the date of termination. Clark Condon Associates, Inc. reserves the right to terminate this contract upon fifteen (15) days notice if any amount billed to client is sixty days past due. If this Agreement meets with your approval, please sign in the appropriate place below and return one copy to us. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to you and look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Scott Slagle, ASLA Principal / Landscape Architect APPROVED: DATE: Contract Number XXX GEOTECHNICAL & MATERIALS TESTING GEOTEST ENGINEERING 1 GEOTEST ENGINEERING, INC. Geotechnical Engineers & Materials testing 5600 Bintliiff Drive Houston. Texas 77036 Telephone: (713) 266-0588 Fax: (713) 266-2977 Proposal No. 1140342399 July 6, 2016 Mr. HoJin Lim, P. E., CFM Klotz Associates, Inc. 1 160 Dairy Ashford, Suite 500 Houston, Texas 77079 Reference: Proposal for Geotechnical Investigation Green Tree Terrace Hike and Bike Trail City of Pearland, Texas Dear Mr. Lim: In accordance with your request, Geotest Engineering, Inc. (Geotest) is pleased to present the revised proposal for the geotechnical investigation of the referenced project. The project consists of a proposed trail approximately 5,600 Linear Feet along Clear Creek right of way from a proposed pedestrian bridge crossing at Clear Creek to FM 518 (W. Broadway Street) on the East side of Pearland Parkway and extending approximately about 500 feet East to Province Village Drive on Developer Gelian Homes property. The project will also include a proposed pedestrian bridge at the crossing of Clear Creek north of a development north of the intersection of Pearland Parkway and Province Village Drive and a proposed culvert crossing. A parking lot is also proposed south of the proposed pedestrian bridge. It is our understanding that the proposed trail section will match the existing channel slope in the Clear Creek right of way. Purpose and Scone The purpose of this study is to perform a geotechnical investigation and develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed trail pavement section, foundation design of the pedestrian bridge, proposed culvert crossing and a proposed parking lot. The scope of services is based on the information provided to us through an e-mail on January 6, 2014, July 27, 2015, September 24, 2015, September 25, 2015, October 12, 2015 and July 5, 2016 and consists of the following: • Drill and continuously sample seven (7) soil borings (in accordance with TxDOT guidelines) to depths ranging from 10 to 80 feet. Texas Cone Mr. HoJin Lim, P.E., CFM Proposal No. 1140342399 Page 2 July 6, 2016 Penetration (TCP) tests will be performed on every 5 -foot interval for all borings. It is assumed that the proposed borings will be located and tied in by you or your surveyor. The details of the borings are given below and also provided in Attachment No. 1. • two (2) 80 -foot borings for the proposed pedestrian bridge. • five (5) 10 -foot borings, four (4) for trail pavement section and one (1) on the proposed parking lot. • Perform laboratory tests including grain size distribution curves with D50 on representative soil samples to evaluate the engineering properties of the soils. California Bearing Ratio tests will be performed to determine modulus of subgrade reaction in accordance with AASHTO criteria for Rigid Pavement Design. Pinhole and crumb tests will be performed to determine the erosion characteristics of the channel embankment soils at the proposed bridge location. • Perform engineering analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for the design of the proposed pedestrian bridge and culvert crossing. The recommendations as a minimum will include the following: • Pedestrian Bridge at Clear Creek Crossings - Develop design axial capacity curves for bridge foundation and including skin friction and point bearing for piling and drilled shaft in accordance with TxDOT Houston District's procedures. — Perform abutment slope stability analysis. • Provide rigid pavement section including subgrade stabilization requirements for trails. • Provide rigid or flexible pavement section for the proposed parking lot • Submit a final geotechnical report containing a plan showing the locations of the borings, Wincore Togs and recommendations as outlined above. Mr. HoJin Lim, P.E., CFM Proposal No. 1140342399 Page 3 July 6, 2016 Schedule and Fees We should be able to start field work within one (1) week after receiving your written authorization or one (1) week after staking the borings, whichever is latest. The field work will be completed in one (1) week, barring bad weather. The laboratory tests will be completed in about five (5) weeks. The geotechnical report, which will include field and laboratory data and design recommendations, will be submitted in about ten (10) weeks after receiving the written authorization. Based on the scope of work outlined above, the cost of the field investigation, laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and a final geotechnical report will be a lump sum $29,053.00. The cost includes the abutment slope stability analysis for the proposed pedestrian bridge. A cost breakdown is provided in Attachment No. 2. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Formal authorization is required for our services. This may be provided by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy for our record. Very truly yours, GEOTEST ENGINEERING, INC. c Mohan Ballagere, P.E. Vice President • / Kuo-Chiang "Frank" Lin, P.E. Sr. Vice President FL\MB\ego Copies Submitted: (I-pol) Enclosures: Attachment No. 1 — Proposed Boring Program Attachment No. 2 — Cost Breakdown PC381Geoiechnical\Proposals140342399R4 DOC ACCEPTED BY: PRINTED NAME: TITLE: DATE: Geotechnical Investigation Green Tee Terrace Hike and Bike Trail City of Pearland, Texas Attachment No. 1 PROPOSED BORING PROGRAM Structure Type Trail Pavement Parking Lot Pedestrian Bridge at Crossing of Clear Creek at Future Development North of Pearland Pkwv Total pc381Geotechnical\Proposals\40342399R4\Bonng Program Proposal No. 1140342399 Proposed Boring Number Depth Footage (feet) (feet) 4 10 40 1 10 10 2 80 160 7 210 Geotechnical Investigation Green Tee Terrace Hike and Bike Trail City of Peariand, Texas Attachment No. 2 COST BREAKDOWN Engineering Services Sr Project Manager Sr Engineer Project Engineer Support Personnel (Drafting, Word Processing) Direct Expenses Subsurface Field Investigation Mobilization/Demobilization of Truck Mounted Drill Rig and Crew Drilling and Continuous Sampling, Truck Mounted Rig. from 0 to 20 feet Drilling and Continuous Sampling, Truck Mounted Rig, from 20 to 50 feet Drilling and Continuous Sampling, Truck Mounted Rig. from 50 to 100 feet Grouting of Completed Bore Holes TxDOT Cone Penetration Test (every 5 feet) Field Coordination , logging and Utility Clearance for Boring Location Laboratory Tests Liquid and Plastic Limits Moisture Content Percent Passing No 200 Sieve Sieve Analysis through No 200 Sieve Sieve Analysis with Hydrometer Density and Moisture Unconsolidated -Undrained Triaxial Compressive Strength, per Specimen or Stage Specific Gravity of Soils California Bearing Ratio Tests Permeability of Soil Consolidated -Undrained (CU) Triaxial Compression with Back Pressure and Pore Pessure Measurement - 3 Specimens Pinhole Test (to detmine erosion characteristics of channel embankment soils) Crumb Test (to detmine erosion characteristics of channel embankment soils) pc381geotechnical.Proposals140342399R4tCost Proposal No. 1140342399 QUANTITY UNIT RATE COST 6 hrs. $167.00 $1,002.00 18 hrs $123.00 $2,214 00 36 hrs $96.00 $3,456.00 6 hrs. $48.00 $288.00 Subtotal $6,960.00 1 ea. $300.00 $300.00 90 ft. $18.00 $1,620.00 60 ft. $20.00 $1,200.00 60 ft. $23 00 $1,380 00 210 ft. $5.00 $1,050.00 42 ea. $23 00 $966.00 40 hrs. $76 00 $3,040.00 Subtotal $9,556.00 42 ea. $53 00 $2,226.00 53 ea. $8 00 $424.00 42 ea. $41.00 $1,722.00 5 ea. $50 00 $250.00 4 ea. $150 00 $600 00 7 ea. $24 00 $168 00 42 ea. $55.00 $2,310.00 3 ea. $51.00 $153.00 3 ea. $185 00 $555.00 1 ea. $250 00 $250.00 2 ea. $1,800.00 $3,600.00 1 ea. $246.00 $246.00 1 ea $33.00 $33.00 Subtotal $12,537.00 Total $29,053.00 Contract Number XXX CULTURAL RESOURCES AMATERRA 4m6tTh rrcr� Proposal for Archeological Background Studies and Historic PCR Along the Clear Creek Trail Harris and Brazoria Counties, Texas For Klotz and Associates (Klotz), AmaTerra Environmental (AmaTerra) proposes to assist with cultural resources compliance as part of the City of Pearland Clear Creek Trail project in Harris and Brazoria Counties, Texas. AmaTerra currently understands that this project is sponsored by the City of Pearland using TxDOT Enhancement Grant funds; therefore, the project would be subject to the Antiquities Code of Texas (ACT) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The project will also require notification with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) because it crosses Waters of the U.S. The project would be reviewed by TxDOT and the USACE and therefore will follow TxDOT's Standards of Uniformity (SOU). Archeological Background Studies AmaTerra will review the existing files held by the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory (TARL) and the Texas Historical Commission (THC) to determine if any previously recorded sites or archeological surveys occur within or near the proposed project area. The location of any previously recorded sites and surveys will be plotted onto USGS 7.5 -minute topographic maps for use in the compliance coordination process. Archeologists will also consult the USDA NRCS soil survey maps for Harris and Brazoria County, relevant aerial photography, historical maps, land use maps, and the Geologic Atlas of Texas in order to assess the likelihood for unrecorded archeological resources and make recommendations regarding the need for further field surveys. The results of this effort will be integrated into a background study report that conforms to TxDOT's SOUs for Archeological Background Studies for review and comment by TxDOT-ENV. Historic Resource Identification, Evaluation and Documentation Services AmaTerra will review the existing files in the Texas Historic Atlas to determine if any previously recorded structures or National Register of Historic Places properties are located within or near the proposed project area. AmaTerra shall prepare a Non -Archeological Historic Resources Project Coordination Request (August 2015) for review and comment by TxDOT-ENV. ASSUMPTIONS • Maps and schematics of the project will be provided by Klotz • This scope does not include an archeological field survey. Should a field survey be requested by TxDOT or the USACE, this would be performed under a separate scope and fee estimate. • This scope does not include a historic resources field survey. Should a field survey be requested by TxDOT or the USACE, this would be performed under a separate scope and fee estimate. AmaTerra Environmental, Inc., No 14-010 updated 7-6-16 Page 1 COMPENSATION AmaTerra can perform this work for a maximum amount of $4,228.00, to be billed monthly on a time and materials basis. AmaTerra's cost for this effort is itemized in the spreadsheet below. COST BREAKDOWN Clear Creek Cultural Resources Background Study and Historic PCR July 6, 2016 LABOR Principal Projec Manager Archeologist V/ Principal Inv9 Archeo Archeo Archeo vl . pbr ist IV ist III ist II •1 Archeolo iist I (Hisbrical Architect/ Senior Historian 2 0 0 0 2 hr $ 133.00 $ 266.00 (Architectural Historian III 4 0 0 0 4 hr $ 104.00 $ 416.00 'Historian II 12 0 0 0 12 hr $ 82.00 $ 984.00 IGIS Specialist 2 0 3 0 5 hr $ 84.00 $ 420.00 Administrative/ Document Production Supervisor 1 0 0 2 3 hr $ 88.00 $ 264.00 Editor 0 0 1 0 1 hr $ 60.00 $ 60.00 (TOTAL LABOR $ 4,217.00 Research Admin and PCR Data Reports Project Total Unit Unit Price Cost Gathering Mgmt 0 0 0 1 1 hr $ 216.00 $ 216.00 0 0 0 1 1 hr $ 135.00 $ 135.00 0 0 4 1 5 hr $ 128.00 $ 640.00 0 0 0 0 0 hr $ 103.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 hr $ 73.00 $ 0 6 6 0 12 hr $ 68.00 $ 816.00 0 0 0 0 0 hr $ 58.00 $ - EXPENSES PCR Copies, b/w gpies, color Mile��ft Lodoini (NTE) Taxes, lodging (15%) Meals Curafon Car Rental TOTAL EXPENSES (TOTAL 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Research Data Gathering Admin and Reports Project Mgmt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Unit Price Cost eact, $ 0.10 $ 1.00 each', $ _ 1.00 $ 10.00 mile $ 0.56 $ nr1 $ 88.000` $ n1ph\ $ 13.20 $ day $ 51.00► $ eacF . $2,400.0C $ day $75.01 $ I$ 11.00 $ 4,228.00 AmaTerra Environmental, Inc., No. 14-010 updated 7-6-16 Page 2 Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT F Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT G Contract No. 12-XXXPXX.XX ATTACHMENT G STATE DOCUMENT AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE HOUSTON DISTRICT PROCEDURES House Bill 6 enacted by the 63rd legislature, established uniform procedures for the transmittal of Texas Department of Transportation (STATE) information to outside parties. This procedure is currently being successfully used for documenting the transmittal of computer data. The following corollary procedure has been developed to assure uniform transaction documentation, adequate storage environments, and sufficient information to enable indexing and shared access of computer media received. Exchange of project files between the Project Engineer and the Consultant/Contractor may be easily handled using our FTP server. Instructions for the use of FTP can be found internally at htto://houwwwcn llerouns1informationsystems'faastFAOframesPaee.htm. If FTP can not be used, deliveries of virus -free CDs containing project files by the Consultant/Contractor are to include a completed MEDIA INFORMATION FORM (hardcopy sample attached). Upon final approval and acceptance of the job, the Project Engineer will send all project files and one copy of the MEDIA INFORMATION FORM (if applicable) to Network Operations in Information Systems for archiving, indexing, and subsequent retrieval. Information and instructions regarding the archiving of design projects may be found internally at httn://houwwwcnl'erouns/infonnationsystersrfaas!FAOframesPaue.htm. The information on archived design projects will be available for use by all STATE employees. No media will be accepted by a STATE Project Engineer without a properly prepared MEDIA INFORMATION FORM. It is the additional responsibility of the Project Engineer to assure all files received from a Consultant/Contractor meet STATE standards whether via FTP or on CD. To enable a workable procedure that will benefit all computer users, information on files delivered by CD must also be included as follows: 1. Use the MEDIA INFORMATION FORM to document any existing Consultant/Contractor prepared, original, computer media in your possession. 2. Review the prepared forms and determine that adequate indexing information is available. Based solely on the information contained on the form, one should be able to determine the media contents. A. If existing media documentation is adequate, forward the media and the completed requisite form to Network Operations. B. If existing media documentation is inadequate, review the contents of the media locally and complete the documentation prior to submitting to Network operations. Page 1 of 13 (Rcviscd 09.10) Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX SPECIAL PROVISIONS STANDARDS AND REOU!REMENTS PURPOSE: The purpose of the following Special Provisions is to identify and define STATE's information Systems requirements and approved procedures to facilitate their use. Recognizing that STATE has a significant investment in hardware, software, and training of personnel engaged in automated plan preparation, precautions are required to assure that the products of this contract are compatible with that investment. 1t is STATE's intention that: The Consultant/Contractor shall provide virus -free files and plots generated from those files. The virus -free files provided, using STATE's hardware and software, must display as plotted and subsequently plot as displayed without conversion, translation, or additional manipulation. In as much as the goal of this contract is to obtain the Consultant/Contractor's original engineering products, no conversion or translation expenses incurred by the Consultant/Contractor shall be charged to, or be paid by, STATE. GENERAL REOUIREMENTS: Due to the variety of hardware and software available in each section and arca office, and to assure the compatibility of files received and data exchanged, the Project Engineer will indicate all approved media(s) and data format(s) on the included APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST. The Consultant/Contractor shall provide, using exclusively the products selected from the APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST, virus -free files and data conforming to the column spacing and format conventions required by STATE programs unless alternately directed by the Project Engineer (see attached Column and Spacing Formats section of these Special Provisions). The Consultant/Contractor shall scan the media for viruses prior to uploading via FTP or delivering any files to STATE. It is the Consultant's/Contractor's responsibility to solicit any additional information that may be required to assure that all media, files and data formats are 100 percent compatible with STATE's information resources. MICROSTATION GRAPHICS FILES: The Consultant/Contractor shall be furnished, on the Department's choice of media listed on the attached APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST, the following information: 1. STATE's File Examples 2. STATE's Plot File Examples 3. CAD File Naming Convention Guideline for the Houston District Page 2 of 13 (Revised 09110) Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX MicroStation .DGN file characteristics will be consistent with STATE standards including, but not limited to, level use, font designations, line weight and color criteria. These characteristics are not to be altered or revised in any manner without authorization by the District Information Resources Administrator. Should a compatibility problem arise, it is the responsibility of the Consultant/Contractor to bring the problem to the attention of the STATE Project Manager who will work with Information Systems personnel and negotiate an appropriate solution. It is the intent of STATE, and this contract, to secure MicroStation .DGN files which have elements of the same integrity, singularly, and attributes as elements generated by STATE's CADD system, Bentley's MicroStation, as well as, file utilization consistent with STATE standards. (See this project's Scope of Services for specific version information.) Proiect Design File Criteria File Descriptions And Terminology: Level use, element location, style, and symbology requirements follow: Planimetric File: Generally a product of stereo digitized aerial photography. The planimetric contains existing topographic and geographic features within the limits of the projected contract. The Planimetric serves as a foundation for referencing and the development of the proposed. Without the Proiect Engineers written agreement. this file shall not be modified. Master Design File, or Schematic Layout: Graphical description of proposed improvements containing graphic elements representing engineering alignments and proposed features. Categories which can simultaneously reference identical coordinates of the planimetric include Right Of Way Maps, Roadway Design, Bridge Design, Traffic Signing, Signals, Striping and Control Plans, and Project Limits Profiles. SHEET FILE: Standard sheet format should be appropriate to the category of the Design File it references. The referenced Design File is to be displayed within a single sheet file and will be terminated by clip referencing to matchlines contained in the Design File. The sheet file will contain all annotation appropriate to the Design File application or category being referenced. Typical examples are text, dimensioning, ramp labeling, patterning, hatching, profile data, etc. File Reauirenients The virus -free media delivered by the Consultant/Contractor shall include documentation of the following: 1. A Media Directory Listing shall be supplied for this information. 2. The symbology, weight, style and color standards for design elements. (See DGNL!B www.dot.state.tx.us/isd/geopak/STATEcadd.htm) Page 3 of 13 (Revised 09/10) Contract No. 1 2-XXXPXXXX 3. Level menu showing level use consistent with STATE standards. (See DGNLIB (u www.dot.state.tx.us/isd/geopak/STATEcadd.htm) 4. Font characteristics and pen tables consistent with STATE standards. (Standards Attached) 5. Completed Consultant/Contractor media index showing name and contact information for computer systems utilized by the Consultant/Contractor. (Form Attached) 6. CAD File Naming Convention Guidelines for the Houston District. (Standards available internally at Link: htto://houtxdocs/houtxdocsllinks.aso?id=HOUSTON004622631) MINIMUM MICROSTATION GRAPHIC FILE REOUIREMENTS: As a minimum requirement, the MicroStation .DGN graphic files shall be comprised of elements defined with the following graphic entities and attributes. Required graphic entities: Line 2 connected points that form a single entity Line Strings a series of connected points that form a single entity Polygon a series of connected points that form a closed entity Circle the geometric definition of a circle (not a line string) Arc a segment of a circle (not a linestring or polygon) Symbol a group of graphic entities that forni a single entity Cell a named, retrievable symbol Required entity attributes: Level - a drawing layer that can be selectively turned on or off Line Weight - a line weight (width) Line Style - a line symbology (dashed, dot -dash, etc.) Color a color code All plots and graphics media provided as a result of this contract shall become the property of STATE. Page 4 of 13 (Revised 09/10) Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX A ,P E C' RODUS L1. 7' (STATE: Check the appropriate media.) Microcomputer and High -End Workstation Media Types CD-ROM Intel DVD -ROM Intel USB Memory Stick Intel Data Format POSSIBLE SOFTWARE (STATE: Check the appropriate software.) (Enter version number in space provided.) Word Processors Spreadsheet Programs Microsoft Word v. Microsoft Excel v. Database Programs Operating System Microsoft Access v. Microsoft XP v. CADD Software Bentley MicroStation v. Bentley GeoPak v._ _ Project Engineer's Printed Name: (Revised 09 10) Project Engineer's Signature: Page 5 of 13 Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF piAvr`}RTA.11ON MEDIA INFORMATION FORM FIRM NAME FIRM CONTACT STATE CONTACT MEDIA OPERATING SYSTEMS MEDIA FORMAT LIMITS ACCOUNT/CONTRACT NO. CSJ NO. THE FILES HAVE BEEN SCANNED FOR VIRUSES AND ARE VIRUS FREE: PHONE NO. HIGHWAY NO. (NAME) (EXAMPLE FOR THE MEDIA LABEL: THE FILES LISTED ON THIS FORM THAT ARE ON 2 OR MORE MEDIA MUST BE LABELED WITH THE CSJ NO. 0999-99-9999 AND NUMBERING SYSTEM OF 1 OF 2, 2 OF 2.) MEDIA LABEL OF TO BE COMPLETED BY HOUSTON DISTRICT INFORMATION SYSTEMS PERSONNEL INDEX NUMBER: RECEIVED BY: DELIVERED BY: VERIFIED VIRUS FREE: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: (Revised 09/10) DATE RECEIVED: Page 6 of 13 DATE: Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX DRAWING INDEX CSJ NO. HIGHWAY NO. MEDIA LABEL OF ACCOUNT/CONTRACT NO. DESIGN FILE DESCRIPTION/STATION LIMITS SIZE SHEET REFERENCE NAME IO2ra101.dgn Alignment File Page 7 of 13 (Revised 09,10) rCSJ NO. L. [DESIGN FILE NAME RPP09.DGN 1 RF REFEREN'E FILE NAME 1 ALIGN.DG 2 BGEOMDGN 3 DTOPO.DGN 4 RGEOM. DGN S PPSHTOL DGN RD WYPRO. DGN CELL LIBRARY: PLOT CONFIG: (Revised 09;10) Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX LEVEE L �T}2 gGUwE ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFIJ LSTATION LIMITS 11046+00 TO 1057+00 Page 8 of 13 [HIGHWAY 1 SHEET NO 1 107 I Of ZO»TAL AELIG M )9T )1LE T $ f[NJ' ET pY ROADWAY G OMETRY FILE REF BORDER FOR ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE SIITS. BELTWAY 8 PROFILE BGE. CEL BGE.PLT CSJ NO. _ MEDIA LABEL Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX PI.OTTINC; INFORMATION HIGHWAY NO. OF ACCOUNT/CONTRACT NO. PLOTTING INSTRUCTIONS: COLOR TABLES PEN TABLES CELL LIBRARIES PLAN SHEETS (DGN.FILES) PARCEL SKETCHES (DGN FILES WITH DIFFERENT DESC) EXAMPLE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE AT YOUR REQUEST CeII Library Plotting Pen Tables Menus Seed Files Page 9 of 13 (Revised 09:10) Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX CONSULTANTS STANDARDS MEDIA DOCUMENTATION This Media contains standard MicroStation cell libraries, plotting pen tables, menus, and seed files used by the Houston District of the Tcxas Department of Transportation and is provided to Consultant Contracting Projects. DRAFTING STANDARDS AND GRAPHIC SEED FILES: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/isd/geopak/STATEcadd.htm CELL LIBRARIES: FILE NAME DESCRIPTION e_ shcet.cel Standard Sheets for English Projects Cell Library advplan.cel Advanced Planning Cell Library gdb 1000.cel Houston District Standard Cell Library schplan.cel Schematic Planning cell Library sign.ccl Sign Cell Library Page to of 13 (Revised 09.'10) WORKSTATION COLOR TABLES: FILE NAME 32color.ctb v256color.ctb schplot.ctb FONT LIBRARY: FILE NAME STATE.rsc Contract No. 12-XXXPXXX.X DESCRIPTION 16 Colors Color Table 256 Colors Color Table (Houston District Standard) Advance Planning Color Table DESCRIPTION Standard Font Library GRAPHIC SAMPLE FILES: FILE NAME 192gt01.dgn 192pp06.dgn 192pp0I .dgn dist 12.dgn d 12ant.dgn 192r2d01.dgn 192ra101.dgn 192rg01.dgn (Revised 09!10) DESCRIPTION Sample Houston District Title Sheet Major Freeway Section (portion of State Highway 6) Non -freeway Section (portion of State Highway 6) Reference file for 192gt01.dgn Reference file for 192gt01.dgn Reference file for 192gt01.dgn, 192pp06.dgn, and 192ppOI .dgn Reference file for 102gt01.dgn, ,192pp06.dgn and 192pp0'.dgn Reference file for 192gt01.dgn, and 192pp01.dgn Page 11 of 13 Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX Planimetric / DTM File Level Men r Photoorammetry Feature DTM Microstation V8 Name Level I Control Horizontal Control, Principal Point no p control ground ctrl 1 Road Paved Road , Curb yes p roadpaved, curb 2 Dirt Road yes p road dirt 3 Guard Rails no p roadyuard rail 4 Guard Fences no p road guard fence 5 Guard Posts no p road guard post 7 Concrete Barrier no p road conc barrier 6 Paint Stripe Solid and Dashed yes p roadaint stripe 62 Bridge End yes p road bridge end 9 Cattle Guard no p road cattle guard 16 Overhead Sign no p road overhead sign 7 General Road Feature no p road general feature 7 Railroad Railroad Track RR Controls no p railroad rr control 10 Drainage Concrete Dam yes p drainage cone dam 27 Concrete Drain yes p drainage conc drain 28 Earthen Dam yes pdrainage earthen dam 26 Ri rap yes p drainage rigrap 8 Culvert yes p drainage culvert 9 Inlet yes p drainage inlet 9 Water yes D drainage water 25 Marsh yes p drainage marsh 24 Structure Building no p structure building Ruin no p structure ruins Sidewalk no p stnicture sidewalk Slab no p stnicture slab Porch, Deck no p structure porch Stairs, Steps no p structure stairs Fence, Gate, Post no p structure fence Retaining WaII no p structure ret wall Wall no p structure wall Cemetery no p structure cemetery Billboard no p structure billboard Sign, Sik'L Pole, Sign Post no p structure sign Antenna, Cellular Tower, Satellite Dish no o structure anten9 Windmill no p structure windmill Flag Pole no p structure flag pole Page 12 of 13 (Revised 09/10) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 23 21 21 20 23 20 I Pipes (Tank 1 Area Under Construction General, AC Unit,Goal Large,Small Circle Unidentified Feature Utility. Fire Hydrant Manhole Marker, Meter, Valve Transmission Tower, transmission Line Pipeline General, Pole,Pole LP, TFP, LP Traffic Light, Gas Light Vegetation Woods Tree Tree Farm Tree Orchard Palm Digital Terrain Model (DTM) Breakline General Breakline Retaining Wall Breakline Sidewalk Breakline Mass Points Water Obscured Obscured Area Pit and Fill Area Stock Pile (Revised 09+10) Contract No. 12-XXXPXXXX no stnicture pitie no structure tank no structure constr irea no structure general p p p P_ no p 23 23 12 23 structure unidentified 23 no p utility fire hydrant no p utility manho e no p utility marker no p utility trans tower no p utitlity pipeline no p utility general pole no p veg woods no p veg tree no p veg tree farm no p veg tree orchard no p veg palm yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes p dtm breakline p dtm general breakline p dtm retaining wall p dtm sidewalk p dtm mass points p dtm water obscured p dtm obscured area o dtm pit or fill area o dtm stock pile Page 13 of 13 20 20 20 20 22 20 29 29 30 29 29 40 53 48 43 38 45 41 24 19 Contract Number XXX ATTACHMENT H